Classical Liberalism V.S. Reform Liberalism on the Issue of Wealth Redistribution and Income

Classical liberalism is against government interventionism in every aspect of life. They believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of income. This is different from reform liberalism in that they hope to secure equal opportunities through government intervention. This can be achieved through gradual income taxation, government regulation of large enterprises, and social welfare. In my opinion, classical liberalism is fair and easy to implement than reformer liberalism.

Classical liberalism will oppose any economic regulation. They believe that those who can earn money based on the principle of supply and demand already are helping other people in the process. Classical libertarians take inequality as an inevitable consequence of free competition, thinking that reinvestment of capital is beneficial in the long term, creating new technologies, employment and opportunities . With heavy taxes on this money, many opportunities and employment will be lost, wealth inequality and poor opportunities will be further increased.

The biggest difference between ideological sets is that reform liberalism takes account of equal opportunities and if one means increasing freedom of others, reducing freedom of one person It is moral. Classical liberalists believe that invisible hands regulate the economy and in the long term redistribution of wealth to the poor hurts them. They believe that everyone should have complete control over their destiny. I think classical liberalism sticks to a very simple principle and I think that it is an excellent theory because everyone is responsible for their actions.

Dickerson, Mark, Thomas Flanagan, and O Neill Brenda. Government and Politics Introduction: Concept approach. Toronto: Nelson Education, 2010. 126-142. printing

Liberal reform: Liberal reform is very similar to classical liberalism, both of which are beliefs on private property, open competition for a strong economy, personal rights and freedom, and the rule of law I am using it. Liberal reform departed from the concept of classical liberal equal opportunities (believing that everyone has the right to receive good education and medical care) and collective interests. Liberalism generally believes that human self-interest improves society. It also focuses on limited government, individual rights, free trade and equality. Both liberalization sectors idealize these values, but we have a different view on how to accomplish these values. As a means to encourage democracy, the ability to promote equal opportunities and reform the liberalism to enjoy the right (positive freedom). Government policies should be used to create equality. Classical liberalism does not promote government intervention but emphasizes free competition (negative freedom)

Breeden Sander (UCID 10080322) October 14, 2011 Jay Makarenko POLI 201 Writing Issues Classical Liberalism V. S Liberalism Reform The problem of classical liberalism is against government interventionism in every aspect of life. They believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of income. This is different from reform liberalism in that they hope to secure equal opportunities through government intervention. This is accomplished by progress ... John Rawls and political liberalism, in Rohr 's theoretical answer to the basic question of political liberalism, is the "overlapping agreement" and "the comprehensive doctrine" I will explain the idea in detail. Role: "Is there a possibility that a fair and stable free and equal civil society will exist for a long time, are they still deeply divided by rational religious, philosophical and moral doctrine?" (Rolls 4) . Specifically, how these concepts are useful for preservation

Classical liberalism is shared by it and consists of many ideologies to reform liberalism. Because of the finite nature of classical liberal ideology, reform liberalism developed from classical liberalism. The essence of classical liberalism can be regarded as restricted in negative or positive light by the person affected by it. The existence of the government can be interpreted as being beneficial or harmful. Classical liberals choose to think that the state is more harmful than aid, so choose to promote limited government concepts that will be related to economic and other social issues. Classical liberalism also promotes the ideology that people believe in government absolute freedom and all other aspects of life. According to classical liberal, this negative freedom is a major fall of the government.