Achieving Democracy and Equality

In this article I will explain why democracy and equality are desirable and why democracy is an important step in achieving equality in the real sense. Political philosophers need to understand one person, transcending the democratic concept of democracy, why these theories continue social and economic inequality. Many democracy do not meet our expectation of providing equality, but there are ways to explain and overcome them.

b) Democracy as a sign of 'common intention' may be incompatible with the principle of individualism defended by liberalism. If liberalism shows freedom, democracy is equal. Trying to achieve both of these values ​​is the foundation of all the historical conflicts. The value of liberalism has been claimed to be freedom, tolerance, privacy, constitutionalism and the rule of law (separation of representation and power). If freedom is the main value of liberalism, we have to answer three questions - where does freedom come from? What do you do freely? Who is freedom?

In this article I will explain why democracy and equality are desirable and why democracy is an important step in achieving equality in the real sense. Political philosophers need to understand one person, transcending the democratic concept of democracy, why these theories continue social and economic inequality. - Lunatics takes over asylum: cultural turmoil in the 1960s All you need is annoyance. (Marshall Berman, The Sixties) formed one of the most culturally complex times of American history in the 1960 's, and analysis of this era is similarly problematic.

It shows us perhaps the most unique experiment in human history, ie instability of social democracy. We can not achieve the dignity, equality and equal opportunity of all people with other political and economic systems. Of course, it eliminates a lot of people from a global perspective, but that would allow us if there is a political will to change our institution so that they will benefit everyone . It is also a solution as neoliberal criticism is approaching. Naomi Klein has long been a system critic. "Not enough: resisting the shocking politics of the playing cards and winning the world we need" she said that we can begin to make us the substitute that we need in a timid manner I showed the method to us. ...) Neo-liberal status of leader's failure to be considered representative is not commensurate with incendians and new fascists