Markets and Society

In this article, I will discuss one of the biggest and most meaningful theories in economic history. It is a division of labor that changes manufacturing and production aspects. The systems, methods and intents derived from today's theory seem to be different from those of the 18th century (when the book was first written), but there are still many similarities in world manufacturing after the second century Yes. Advantages, disadvantages and problems indicated in the text.

Therefore neo-liberalism is not different between market economy and market society. Through the above attitude and ethics, market only sells itself to other market participants, market society, market culture, market value, market people. In a sense, neo - liberalism has returned to the state of early liberalism - early liberalism also combines culture, value, morality and economics. But neo-liberalism has brought a more intensive "market" - not only to replace the traditional social form but also to replace the concept of private life. At the same time, this 'market' is far from the necessity of production. It also applies to early liberals - famine often occurred in Europe at that time then. In fact, it is far from the existing 'market' cultural concept, so it may be better to use other words.

Professor Michael Sandell of Harvard University, when talking about "a society with markets", caught the essence of the problem and became a "market society". The nation and civil society should positively socialize and humanize the economy, but the government allows the market to gradually save social inhumanization. In a wonderful review of Ron Williams 'Michael Sundel' Money can not buy prospective customers ', he pointed out that Sandell' s premise of overmarketing criticism is as follows: