In this article, the main concern is a thorough analysis and discussion of gay marriage subject. In order to build this, this article explains the support and opposition for homosexual marriage. Regarding the position of gay marriage support, we will focus on respect for discrimination, equality and individual rights. The argument against the homosexual marriage will be based on the inclusion of the ideas and new materials we raised in the discussion. Serious logical flaw: It is periodic and deterministic. In gay marriage debates, questions are raised about the definition of marriage. Advocates of gay marriage say that in fact, the definition of marriage as a combination of male and female is wrong. It must be extended to include same sex couples. Given this challenge to the definition of marriage, this definition alone can not provide it separately. You need to attach reasons why males and females are defined as correct or best definitions. Defense will experience a fatal cycle unless the defense definition is simply the definition of the definition itself. It insists on the conclusion as a conclusion (the correct definition of marriage). This is the same as saying "I said so, so it's right." Controversy continues constantly about homosexual marriage. Liberal and conservatives have repeatedly argued that this is the best way to deal with homosexual marriages. In a strict definition, liberalists want to legalize gay marriages. On the other hand, conservatives just want to maintain marriage between men and women. But in this discussion the boundaries between these conflicting views deviate from the basic view on the problem. - According to Mueller 's freedom of speech, "... is almost as important as freedom of thinking and largely depends on the same reason" (71). And indeed, it is inseparable from freedom of thought. Muller insists that we need to think freely think freely, have the freedom to form my opinion, and open a free discussion forum to express disagreement of opinion. Questions about ethics, family relations, freedom of speech, and sexuality are in danger in homosexual marriage debates. The main assertion of gay marriage is that we should control the government to suppress marriage and other problems in private life. "Question: Homosexual marriage" is a book written by Debra Miller in 2012 and includes a broad perspective on the subject. One of the biggest problems in homosexual marriage debate is the importance of American churches being separated from the state.

As more and more women continue to enter the workplace, the issue of balance between work and family continues, so the discussion of "the way of the mummy" caused intense debate. Many female managers and experts with young families are quickly away from the so-called "mummy track". Today, as young people apply for work, many people are considering the value of the company's work and life balance. For many women who wish to continue climbing the company ladder, maternal pressure has been said to be an obstacle. Although the problem of the mother track was basically solved, the problem of glass ceiling effect still exists. Women are no longer diverted to completely different career tracks. Instead, they noticed that they reached the highest level, not almost completely. The glass ceiling is so called because it is a place where women can not reach and because the women are advanced ceilings. The ceiling is made of glass so that women can see far away. In today's case-driven society, employers are reluctant to formulate written policies that openly discriminate women. In the 1980's the term "glass ceiling" was often used with another term "milack truck". At that time, women of childbearing age were often considered as lacking motivation and lack of discipline, not male employees or older women. . If a child is born, the women are considered to take a big vacation or leave the workers altogether. When a woman comes back to work, it is considered that few dedicated employees are responsible for the mother's responsibility. As a result, many companies divert young women to "mother's truck". This is a side job that women are not given the responsibility to actually influence the company actually by promotion or raise. For a long time people have always believed that once a woman at a paid workplace makes a child they may be pretending to be a pro because they are too busy now. This "way of mother" is not necessarily feminine preference. A recent study by Professor Jennifer Berdahl of the University of Toronto examines whether there is a career path for the father and how to treat when the male is responsible for care. Using mail surveys, she asked trade unions and civil servants about their views, not about salary and promotion, but about "treatment" or harassment in the workplace when they became caregivers. She found it: Taking a train is a fun experience for young train enthusiasts. The elephant has the idea of ​​a monorail, and there is a train on that track. Whether his mother and dad are talking to him or doing something, it always returns to the train. So one day they took a real train. But, if other passengers Cat, Penguin, Rabbit want to play their favorite car instead of Little Elephant's beloved train, can you save this trip? Abbot 's bright manga infant attractively tells only one word at a time (yet they say up to four different words throughout the book), and she raises and lowers the eyebrows and crosses them I will lift it. A weapon to make them loving. The early prosperity of the elephant changed slowly from disappointment to indignation. An airplane of a train! "The best part of the whole train? Of course, the elephant's new friend, which does not guarantee to reduce the commitment of the reader himself, but it is certainly interesting to read aloud.

Acid rain is one of the global problems facing human society now. In order to solve the acid rain problem, it is necessary to understand the influence of acid rain and change of air pollution source which may cause problems. Understanding these will help leaders better decide how to manage air pollution and how to reduce or even eliminate acid rain. In the early 1970s, no country had a policy to solve this problem (Foster). Today, most, if not all, countries follow international policies promulgated by the Long Distance Transboundary Air Pollution Treaty (FORTER). What is acid rain? Acid rain is more rain than usual. Acid rain is a complicated problem. This is not the latest phenomenon. In the 17th century scientists noticed the adverse effects of industrial and acidic pollution on plants and humans. However, the word "acid rain" was not born two centuries ago after Angus Smith published a book titled "Acid Rain" in 1872. Every day, plants and automobiles burning fossil fuels deliver thousands of tons of sulfur and nitrogen oxides into the air. Exhaust System Solar light converts these gases into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which are absorbed by water particles in the cloud. They mix with rain and snow and fall on the earth. Usually it is several hundred miles away from the original pollution source. Acid rain is a precipitate containing harmful amounts of nitric acid and sulfuric acid. When fossil fuels burn, these acids are formed mainly by nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides released into the atmosphere. These acids rain on the earth as wet rain (rain, snow, fog) or dry rain (gas and particles). Some are windy, sometimes hundreds of miles. In the environment, acid rain destroys trees, causes acidification of soil and water, making water inappropriate for specific fish and other wildlife. It also accelerates the collapse of buildings, statues and sculptures that are part of our country's heritage. Acid rain destroys lakes, ponds, rivers and soils in Massachusetts State, causing damage to wildlife and forests. For details of acid rain, please visit http://www.epa.gov/acidrain/. Acid rain generally affects the chemical properties of soil, plant activity and surface water's acidity. In this sense, this means acid rain has a big impact on the environment. Increasing acid rain continues to affect the health of humans and plants, the chemical composition of the soil, and most importantly the survival of aquatic life. The higher the acid concentration, the more severe the result will be. Consistent high levels of acid rain can significantly reduce the life activity of plants and the continuity of aquatic life. The majority of the impact depends on the presence of acidic deposits in the atmosphere and the acidity of various forms of precipitation.

As the Bible says, the Hebrew language that came out of Egypt is controversial. The literal, Biblical reading portrays the mysterious supernatural events that suggest the influence of the God of Hebrew. There are three main theories about the events in Egypt. The first is that the incident happens exactly according to the requirements of the Bible, including miraculous events. Second, Exodus occurred as the Bible stated. The last thing is that the incident never happened. A description of these theories is introduced in this article. Discussions on the role of "professional revolution" have a long history in the leftist anarchist controversy. After being released, Exodus delicately suggested it when the Hebrews faced Moses as to question their authority over them. A similar concern about the political and social life pattern after the revolution is wisely suggested, recognizing that people can not always be able to solve the need of the nation quickly and rapidly There. Even if a movie is not represented in too many languages, the role of the prophet in providing the commandment itself is problematic. Yul Binnner caught the essence of his personality in the movie "Ten Command" in 1956, and Ramesses II became an Egyptian pharaoh in the imagination of the masses. This background history has caused a lot of controversy, but it is safe to say that Ramses' personality is consistent with the image of the ruler who rejects God's request. The defeat of the king in Kadesh's fight against Syria's Hittite People's Republic was seldom successful due to the basic failure of military information and was saved only when the reinforcement arrived at the last end of Lebanon's coast. In the explanation of the entire wall of Rameses, which occupies much of his monument, this non-targeted lottery became the mother of all victories that won himself Ramses has always been closely related to the Pharaoh of "Exodus", but there is no evidence to support this claim. After the Cecile B. Demir movie "Ten Command" succeeded in 1956, the relationship between the name "Lamesis" in the Bible and the unnamed Egyptian pharaoh became very common. The movie version of the Bible story follows the movie of Demir, including the popular animated film "Prince" Egypt (1998) and the recent Exodus: The Gods and Kings (2014), but this association has no historical support.

"I have a very strict gun control policy - if you have a gun, I would like to manage it." - The history of gun control of Clint Eastwood was approved by Article 2 of the Constitution 1791 I go back to the year. But recently, we have escalated the discussion on gun control to a more unresolved issue than many citizens can join. After all, the stories about gun incident are common today in newspapers, television and radio. It can be said that the discussion began with the establishment of the firearm management law in 1968. This prohibited certain groups of people from holding a gun or regulating the sale of guns. It may be distracting for brave men, women, and young people to discuss the second amendment to participate in the gun control debate. But it does not have to be so. There are many false alarms that encourage political discussions over gun control, but the law itself and its application are relatively easy to follow. The following explains the second amendment and how it supports state gun reform requirements. There are explanations about the worldwide task of implementing constitutional rights. Discussion on gun control The discussion on gun control has recently become very popular. People question whether guns are really needed. Others want to know that if the government provides that they have the right to have a gun crime rate, the number of deaths in the United States will decrease. Some people think that guns should not be attributed to death, "guns do not kill people, people kill people." If they are convinced of their claim, how can you conclude which claims are right? There are always two aspects of the constitution, which are excluded. The Bill of Rights was approved on December 15, 1791. (Constitution of the United States) There were major criticisms, especially in recent years, due to the revision of the Constitution. The subject of gun control is controversial and related issues are submitted to the Supreme Court. The second amended country states: "A well-controlled militia is necessary for the security of free countries, the citizens have the right to hold and carry weapons and not violate it.

Discussion is an excellent, very interesting way to teach students a number of skills. They offer students research theme, team work, practice of speaking in public, and the ability to use critical thinking skills. Despite the challenge of educating the tween (perhaps because of that) it is particularly beneficial to discuss in the classroom of the junior high school. The following is a list of topics suitable for use in the classroom of the junior high school. When you read this content, there are some contents suitable for a specific course field and some contents suitable for that course. Each item is listed as a proposition. You assign the team to this proposition, and the opposite team object Discussion is the main contents of the social studies curriculum of junior high and high school students. But have you ever thought of using discussions in lower grades or math lessons? Education World provides five discussion strategies and additional courses for students of all ages. There are five courses in this article. Our school principal had recently had a conversation involving pointing out our blanks with our high school students, from the 5th grade to the 8th grade students. They raised race profiling, immigration, Islamic phobia, equal salary to women, and the right of LGBTQ. I am familiar with what the media is talking about, watching debates with my family, not receiving the information that my colleagues are sharing, and they are listening to my family. And their school hearing Discussions in Congress can set themes within a few days to a few weeks from when the debate starts, or on the fly. In the debate of the US Congress, topic-specific topics are mainly used for one-to-one discussion and open discussion between the two schools to promote and promote the subject. By setting a theme, you can conduct preliminary research, brainstorming and practical discussion. However, in the discussion itself, the fewest notes were used, and the lectures and explanations were not read. Written quotes are used carefully or not at all. Discussion of the Congressional contest is usually instant and will be announced on a separate theme a few minutes before each round. Five 184. Also see Robert Branham, "I failed to argue". Malcolm X's prison debate and mass conflict, What is talking about in the classroom and the world is to use animals in experiments. The subject of almost all classroom discussion units or school discussion groups contains questions on whether humans have reason to test animals. In PETA, it is our core belief that animals are not ours. Many schools discuss topics to persuade compelling writing, acquisition of research skills, controversy, or to aid recognition of many aspects of multifaceted problems. . This Student Debate Toolkit lists resources that can be shared with students to support arguments that should not be used in experiments.

Discussion on child care 'I believe that many women have the right to become the glory of the greatest mother in the world, unbecken profession, and medal.You can not do both.' Tunku Varadarajan 's article "Love" said. (Http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/tvaradarajan/?id=90000479) In the article of Mr. Varadearajan, questions about debate about child rearing - normative questions Are there any children receiving day care? Accept the same quality of care the mother receives at home. This article recalls that children's development is very important in today's psychology. That's why it's not surprising to do so much research on this topic. Author "Louise B. Silverstein" shows a very interesting prospect for the history and future of parenting psychology research, and the impact of employment of childbirth on children, in the article "Changing discussion on childcare and childbirth employment" . The essence of development Silverstein ... According to Freud, children develop into society through a series of "sexual psychological stages" such as oral cavity, anus, penis, hatching, genitalia. The first three psychological stages span the first five years of self, superego and suicide development, so they are more focused. Sexual desire (sexual pleasure drive) is fixed at the stage of determining libido, and it is caused by depression or excessive indulgence Nurseries and other nursery schools are the care and supervision of children. The age ranges from 6 weeks to 13 years. Nursery schools are daycare centers, nanny, nanny, teachers and other providers that take care of children's behavior and skills. Child care is a broad theme covering a wide range of experts, agencies, backgrounds, events, social and cultural practices. Early child care is equally important, it is an element of parenting that tends to be overlooked. Child care providers can be the first teachers of children and therefore play essential roles in early childhood education systems. High quality care at a young age has a great influence on the success of children in the future. Whether the main focus of child rearing is spiritual, social or psychological, is the development of children.

Recently, the idea of ​​sharing media files over the Internet is a controversial topic. File sharing applications like Napster are currently criticized by the US government and music labels, but I do not think anyone would try to imitate Napster's technology. Johnny Deep, a computer consultant at Troy, New York, is known as the founder of 'Next Napster'. The idea behind "Aimster" was named after his daughter Aimee. Aimster is backed by popular and highly popular instant messaging services such as AOL Instant Messenger, AOL, MSN Messaging Service. In these industries, Napster, Aimster, KaZaA, Morpheus, and other file sharing technologies were extremely difficult due to numerous illegal copying problems in the domestic market. Over the past few years these industries have filed a number of lawsuits around the world against individuals illegally distributing copyrighted works via peer-to-peer networks. The courts of developed countries including Australia, Canada and the United States are also full of incidents dealing with secondary copyright liability. As can be seen from the discussion of these incidents, applications in the interrelationship of secondary liability theories yielded conflicting results. On the one hand, while Napster and Aimster's services are responsible for the 9th Circuit Court and the 7th Circuit Court, Grokster and Streamcast were not responsible for the Central District of California. Each lawsuit contains different interpretations of the decision by Supreme Court against Sony and its impact on the principle of secondary responsibility. In contrast to the decision of Napster and Aimster, in the case of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. Grokster, the Central District Court of California, the peer-to-peer Morpheus (administered by Streamcast) court, between these new services and Napster We decided to focus on the core technical differences of. Centralized index of distributed files on the server, and Grokster is not responsible for that user's copyright infringement. Do not create a temporary index called a super node on the user's computer on the network or do not use a centralized index. In short, the court acknowledged the defendant 's character, they only did sell part of the software to the user, there was no further interaction like Sony just sold the VCR to consumers.

Shakespeare writer's debate William Shakespeare is regarded as one of the most respected and famous authors of history, but the controversy centers around his idea that he actually created his own literary work. Some people, like William Shakespeare, question the reality of those who compare the quality of their work with their own personal career and education. With these claims, it persuaded others to peek at the people we all were taught as "Shakespeare", but he is actually behind these genius literary promises and enlightenment work He was a man. For more information on people who do not agree with me, please see Shakespeare - Earl of Oxford. This site will explore Shakespeare's writers' discussion over the 2nd century. The purpose of the Association is to document and establish Edward Devil as a prominent author of William Shakespeare's work, so their website is against my own argument. Read it and weigh the evidence by yourself Is DeVere still Shakespeare? Abstract: Discussions on the legality of Shakespearean writers have been controversial for centuries. Many scholars believe that Shakespeare's work was written by Christopher Marlow, Francis Bacon, William Stanley etc, but the most hot discussion today is William Shakespeare and Oxford R. Edward Devil's It is a debate. . On both sides of this discussion are people who insist on many followers, Stratford, or Shakespeare ... misunderstandings and happy endings. These are considered elements of comedy. Because Shakespeare was a celebration of Christmas, I write a comedy called "Twelfth Night". But on the last day of January 6th all decorations fell and gave Queen Elizabeth sorrow. At 6:30 pm on Saturday, September 15, Alexander War will discuss the identity of Shakespearean writers at the historic Myers Park near From Craig, Earl of Oxford, Ascis. This discussion is part of Shakespeare's weekend and is sponsored by Professor Gerard Kilroy. At 2 pm on Sunday, September 16, the Elyria Venetian merchant performed at the Causeway Elizabeth Theater. The food and drink tickets for each event are £ 30. Shakespeare Writers Trust and other charitable organizations were donated. For details and ticket booking please see Shakespeare's weekend. From April 23rd to 26th, Brunel University will hold a series of events Shakespeare Week for Shakespeare, focusing on writers' problems. This event included an article by Lord Mark Lily and friends "I am Shakespeare", a discussion between Professor Alan Nelson and Dr. Ros Barber, and Alexander Waugh "Shakespeare is a fake". In a little speech, Professor William Leahy and Professor Tom Betteridge are free, except for the activities of Sir Marc Lilys, "Legacy of Brexit, Trump, Bud: Shakespeare's play is not important?" For details and reservation of tickets, please see Shakespeare Week.

Over the years, Stonehenge has been the center of many discussions, confusion, controversy and debate, especially in the UK. Stonehenge bothered and divided experts for decades. What is Stonehenge? Who built Stonehenge? Why was Stonehenge made? (What is Stonehenge, Abel, Harriet?) There are many discussions about Stonehenge. Especially its origin and use. Some of the controversies include aliens, glaciers, wizards merlin, demons and pure manpower. For thousands of years, Stonehenge has been excavated, X-rays, measurement and measurement. Although many aspects of Stonehenge are still controversial. More importantly, even if the stone we are seeing today represents the ruins of Stonehenge, it is still a symbol of Britain's largest country, symbolizing mystery, strength and durability. No one decides its age, builds it, and what it does. There are many theories to explain the function and history of the monument, but few people know it. These diverse theories are very colorful, many of which are called "mysteries of Stonehenge". Stonehenge: Not only a few stones in the UK, it is Stonehenge, one of the eight wonders of the world. Visitors from all over the world will see this amazing mystery. Stonehenge is located in the open area of ​​the Salisbury Plain 2 miles west of Amesbury in Wiltshire in South England. The theory about who built the Stonehenge includes druids, Greeks, Phoenicians or Atlantis (stone). It consists of a series of structures including stone, earth, and trees. Structure is used Stonehenge and Easter Island Stonehenge and Easter Island are two very old and interesting mysteries and monuments in the world. Stonehenge is in Salisbury, England, made of plenty of grass and large gray stones. The place was made between 1520 BC and 3000 BC. There are many reasons why Stonehenge is built. Stonehenge was built using accurate building stages. Archeologists say that it may have been ritual, traditional and even used. Through the resources I already have - through the course I'm studying - I tried to learn more about fractals. During my second grade, I learned through the course of European history and architecture the accomplishments of ancient architecture such as Stonehenge, Giza's pyramid, Parthenon temple, many Gothic cathedrals and Taj Mahal. Somehow it is involved in the use of the golden ratio

Discussion on gene screening In the past 30 years, researchers have found strong evidence for genes and diseases. Immediately after isolating a particular candidate gene, the development of predictive genetic testing began. Predictive gene screening is only applicable to a small number of diseases, but its effects and consequences are intense debate in a wide range of fields including government and religion. Discussion began when the BRCA1 gene was isolated in 1993. Genetic screening is always controversial. Since the 1990's more and more researches have been done on disease pathogenesis (Chadwick, 1). Screening brings benefits - the opportunity to see diseases and cancers that may be at risk, and the opportunity to look up personal personal genomes (Tree.com). However, as genetic screening becomes more common it leads to a number of disadvantages. - Sex discrimination in the workplace is still obvious despite equal legalization opportunities. Women have made great progress in terms of labor and are an integral part of the labor market. Because they have more opportunities to pursue higher education, they can acquire more traditional male-led professionals like law. Genetic Screening - Try to measure your employee's physical condition through blood test. In 1990, 15% of US companies intended to use genetic screening as a tool for physical examination. However, as the use of genetic screening increases, there is intense debate about the ethical issues of occupational decision making based on invariant properties. Since the company uses genetic screening as a selection tool, the applicant can not improve or change it. In addition, the company will be obliged to design an accessible workplace (Kramar, et al., 1997). Genetic testing and gene screening are two different programs. Genetic testing is a test used to detect the presence of specific gene sequences, chromosomes, or gene products related to genetic diseases. Genetic screening of all populations or individuals not necessarily at risk. For example, if you do not have breast cancer in your home and still want to take exams, you will be genetically screened. This is usually done before signs of illness appear. Genetic testing is a program that can be used to judge the identity of diseases such as Crohn's disease and Alzheimer's disease and to judge how high your disease has changed. You can do this to understand or compare partner compatibility. Perform genetic screening to determine if a person can transmit hereditary diseases even if he or she does not have the risk of developing a physical condition

Whether the gift of the Holy Spirit stopped the attractive argument in modern usage or continued is separating the Christian church. There are several extreme situations on both sides of the fence. A dialect believes that if a person speaks a dialect, he is under the control of the devil and he or she can not be saved unless a person speaks a dialect as evidence of the acceptance of the Holy Spirit baptism. Both views use the Bible to keep their position. The Bible is not for division, but for bringing us closer to God. Today there are many arguments about the effectiveness of talking in tongues, especially abusive in the Christian world in particular. Nevertheless, some Christian churches teach that all the attractive gifts (talking with tongue, knowledge, prophecy etc.) will disappear with the completion of the New Testament (1 Corinthians 13: 8-12). Others still claim that the church still offers charming gifts today (1 Corinthians 1: 7). The purpose of this article is not to focus on this problem. Because this problem is divided very closely, I believe or do not believe it will not affect human salvation. However, the two sides are doing good discussions and the Christian church needs to be as polite as possible to those who do not agree with this controversial issue. Approximately 15 years ago, Australia 's attractive protestant movements gathered to form the Christian church in Australia, withdrawing from useless arguments. This bill revives the belief in efforts to cope with modernity. All in common, changed the different efforts to a force that can not be ignored. Another example of useless discussion is that discussions on frameworks and human resources skills are getting fiercer in a moment. This is the usage of a fool. Without the help of other people, they are not functioning optimally. Frameworks implemented regardless of people or culture will fail. People's skills makes everyone happy, and it is not worthless with concentration and structure. Finding a middle place is where you can find real value and possibilities

About Napster's debate Napster software was introduced in 1999, which allows people to share digital music files (MP3) with each other. This Internet project has brought about a historical debate about the copyright law and the Internet. The copyright holders strongly believe that "sharing" these files through Napster is "stealing" (TIME). It is illegal to download music according to the desires of artists and producers. Some people think this is not illegal or stolen. They just copy someone's songs. The Internet is a very useful document. Using it, people can get information on almost any topic. A relatively new project for Internet technology for sharing music has emerged and caused countless legal controversies: Napster. Napster allows people to share music files, discover new artists, and become members of the online music community. - The current state of the music industry is disappointing, but it is still progressive. Continuing to deform is very interesting. Turning to digital music has brought a new era that affects all aspects of business. The view is different whether the project has improved or declined, but that is changing, the fact that the future of music is formed in front of us is the fact. Napster accountability has become a serious discussion by providing users free access to music file sharing. Currently, Napster is accused of serious legal dispute as it violates the Copyright Infringement Act. The American Recording Industry Association (RIAA) represents five major record companies including Bertelsmann. Bertelsmann believes that the service of Napster is illegal because there is no charge for their use of music. However, Napster believes that it is protected by the "Safe Harbor" provision of the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Napster does not store MP3 files, but as Napster allows users to exchange files between members, Napster claims that the site is protected by law. On May 5, Napster's motion to renounce the renunciation of the case by RIAA has been dismissed, and the fate of Napster and the fate of the digital music industry will now be decided by the court. One of the most interesting arguments about distributed computing involves Napster, a music file sharing application that allows users to access a vast database of files. The record company filed a lawsuit against Napster and accused the system of poorly sold records. Napster was found to be in violation of the copyright law by distributing unauthorized software and it was closed. After the collapse of Napster, people need a file sharing system that is less susceptible to litigation. Gnutella is a developed distributed system. With this system you can query the file without sharing the central directory and share it among users so that you can protect the network from legal issues of individual users.

Wherever we go, discussions will always follow humans. For centuries, humans have discussed a number of issues. A common question that has been discussed since the beginning of the 20th century is whether wealthier individuals in society should charge more tax than their poorer counterparts. We argued about the pros and cons of many people taxing to the rich, but when it becomes objective, the pros and two arguments far outweigh the pros and cons. Experts must not only exceed the strengths and weaknesses but also ask their own questions. Do prosperous people really need extra money? Rich people should be taxed higher because they are better for the economy, and the social class will show more content ... It is not good for the United States to promote economic disparity due to these tax breaks. The United States should promise to provide more social and economic equality to all people. Tax cuts can slow down economic development by investing more money rich and reduce investment in those who need it. Another reason the rich should pay more tax is that they have obligation to do society. Nobody will be today, unless you bring up those who nurture them and the society where they are raised. In "The Great Gatsby", Nick Callaway dislikes Tom and Daisy, "Tom and Daisy - they crush things and creatures, then returned to their money and their carelessness, or to one of them Let them be together and try to eliminate the confusion others have done "(Fitzgerald 179). Nick was fully defeated by Tom and Daisy and did not help the behavior of society and other people. Successful people are very successful as their society and the situation are successful. If there is no better condition for them to live happily, it is logical for those who succeeded in the past or 10%. In a recent speech at Princeton last summer, the writer Michael Lewis said: "If you succeed, be aware that you have luck and duty, you are the only god of yours I am in debt instead of being disappointing debt. "One In the latter part of Harvey Houston there was discussion about the tax increase proposal that lasted only 12 months. This will help urban funds clean up their work sooner. Of course, discussions about tax increases, even temporary tax increases have been confusing people. I know that. We dislike taxes. The tax is very bad. City services should be paid for free. I understand why people are opposed to tax increases, but I also understand why this is necessary in some cases; in the case of Houston it is very important. If we are truly "together," all my neighbors will tell "sin of survivor" without any problems - I feel this word can not bear - and a good way to help out then It is sitting with a small temporary tax No, I will keep writing articles about tax issues. As it is derived, I will stick to the use of law and case law to avoid the noise of key tax evasion debate and to explain the subject matter of tax law. However, this may not be true within a few years. In the future, our tax laws will all be handed over from Google. Photo Provider: Edward Kasner is an American mathematician who created the word "googol" to define the power of numbers from 10 to 100. This is the number of 100 zeros after writing. This is a big number. googolplex is 10 against power googol. This is 0 with a number of googol after 1. This is a bigger number In the D.C. tax discussion, "tax reform" means concrete things: reduction of tax rate and expansion of tax base. A decrease in income results in loss of income, but income from tax collection will expand by complementing income loopholes, exemptions and incentives to compensate for income. I personally do not think this explains the real tax reform (I have a better definition below), that is what that term means. Given the positive implications of 'reform', what are the advantages of low interest rates and a broader base? Both theoretically and proofly, those with significant tax liabilities indicate that lobbying laws are

Discussion of Darwin and Gambling Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Newborn Birth Point" provides a human face for academic discussions on the natural selection of Darwin and gambling. In the story, Georgiana left a birth spot on her cheek. It is visible throughout her life, but she just began to stimulate her husband, Elmer. He took advantage of science to successfully separate his wife from his birth mark, but this procedure is fatal. The process that the couple experienced seems to be a reaction to the theory of natural selection, and her death is the final conclusion. Saini also explains Elizan Gamble's 1894 book "Women's Evolution: Studies of Male Inferiority," the story of Eliza Gamble. Discussed. Gambling summarizes numerous discussions and studies that show that women are not inferior to nature, but they seem like this because they have no opportunity to develop talent. Discussion of gambling helped early feminists fight for voting rights. However, as Saini emphasized, she has no influence on the scientific community. The doctor's theory has been proved sometimes by female scientists and its research is ignored. Inferior, Saini analyzed many flawed studies done by men who were not usually replicated or were hastily accepted. Repeated experiments are considered a key to science, but it is often too expensive or difficult. This report concludes by addressing the most fundamental but overlooked aspects of gambling debate. Simply put, do you have the right to choose whether to gamble? The ability of people to spend money anytime, anywhere is an important decision in a truly free society. Even though a small number of people choose to engage in gambling activities, they should respect individual rights to freedom of choice. We believe that the government should not encourage or impede gambling. If an individual chooses to bet, that is their choice. In addition, if individuals and private organizations want to judge the necessity of gambling and provide opportunities for gambling, that should also be their choice.

Whether pardoning money will enhance the power of other countries in the country. The last few minutes of amnesty before President Clinton left the White House left a shadow that lasted for his two-year presidential election. To understand this controversy, we need to discuss the pardon of Mar Rich, the amnesty of Glenn Braswell, and the adverse effects of former President and former First Lady. Mark Mesetti and Gary Coen, Mark Rich's article "President and forgiveness, price?" Escapes the United States A recent noteworthy example is that Clinton forgave some people at the end of his term. In response to the amnesty of international criminals, Mark Ricky Clinton began a serious discussion on the overall benefit of the presidential amnesty. Mark Rich was guilty of 38 criminal acts and was convicted, but an amnesty was granted (http://www.house.gov/reform/hearings/rich.pardon/weinberg.auerbach. pdf). Due to the contribution to Clinton's campaign, it is inferred that the end of the period was approved. Another remarkable amnesty was an amnesty for President Ford President Nixon in 1974. A very interesting amnesty was President Carter. And then he used Nixon 's forgiveness as a means of winning the election, later gaining the generosity of the Watergate case. A good example of a more positive amnesty is the civil war side of 1868. The President's power has been accused as Clinton forgets some suspicious people on the last day of his term, or even after Gerald Ford forgave Richard Nixon. This is a groundbreaking news. Mr. Trump and his Core Circle have been working together to identify a series of truly wonderful serious offenses, including accepting donations from illegal overseas campaigns and actively working with foreign diplomats to interfere with elections under investigation. And just a few days ago, the playing card revealed that everyone who thought that he could promote his career was satisfied to forgive. President's amnesty ability is one of the most widespread and unrestricted authority given to the executive branch. There is no debate about forgiving Joe Alpaio's legal authority for all the crimes cards committed in his 85 year life. However, the decision to pardon Alpaio will justify the policies and procedures he does, not particularly on his way to the White House, especially as Mr. Trump got into office as President. Lucky Thanksgiving Family Turkish family "drumstick" met with a lawyer this week to determine whether drumstick's pardon is still valid even after the president was forcibly dismissed. Earlier this week, President Cardo forgave drum stick at the ceremony at the TV's White House. Under Presidential Decree, Drumstick will be allowed to spend the rest of his life at the safest poultry death camp in southern Virginia. Drumsticks Uncle Gizzard Pouch says: According to Mr. Muller 's survey, the president is Russia' s largest money launderer since the 1990 's. We are very afraid that the pardon of drumstick will be abolished. Even if he turns out to be a criminal president, is his order still valid?

The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court filed a lawsuit indicating that the MMR vaccine caused Urabe mumps virus strains. Adverse reactions to MMR vaccines have been reported to the US and Canadian authorities as Japanese vaccines have been reported to cause meningitis. Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. - Introduction of influenza. Meningitis tetanus. There are hundreds of different infectious diseases that measles individuals can contract from others directly or indirectly through the air they breathe. For many infections, some people have to figure out ways to prevent the spread of these diseases. Therefore, the concept of immunization was born. The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court filed a lawsuit indicating that the MMR vaccine caused Urabe mumps virus strains. The reader believes that his article is a controversial article. Both authors agree to dismiss essential HPV vaccines, but each vaccine has its own belief. While using various methods, Allen's tone and language in his work is different from Adam's article. Still, many autistic organizations still believe in the connection. Early in March 2008, the discussion of vaccine autism continued after recurring after approving payment of compensation to a 9 year old Georgian family who developed symptoms of autism after receiving regular childhood immunization . According to officials, a pediatric vaccine given to a girl in 2000 caused the experiment to gradually become phased out and then exacerbated existing symptoms before it appeared as symptoms like autism. According to the family, the existing condition is mitochondrial disease, cell's "energy source".

The death penalty attempts to imagine that relatives are sitting in a dark and cold, tight jail cell and they know they will die by a fatal injection in a matter of minutes. If their case is not handled correctly, if the evidence is not handled properly, innocent people may be dead. Imagine a family waiting for justice through a fatal injection for years. Each story has two aspects, both families are sad or already exists. According to the Death Penalty Information Center (2011), since 1976, the United States executed 1,243 people convicted of serious crimes. Discussion on the death penalty has raised many questions about the relationship between pragmatism and moral principles. If perpetrators are found guilty, this problem becomes complicated. Since 1973, after being convicted of new evidence and technological progress, more than 130 people have been released from death row prisoners. Many death penal offenders are based on an investigation showing that the death penalty is deterrence of crime or racial prejudice against minorities. Besides, the death sentence that forces the government to have a tremendous economic burden is pointed out and it often restricts the quality of lawyers accused of defending defendants. But those who oppose the death penalty for moral reasoning say that such considerations should not be the most important, but may be counterproductive, if later studies would compromise these arguments. The death penalty, also known as the death penalty, is a ruling requiring the use of deadly forces to high-risk prisoners. This form of punishment has become a controversial topic in many discussions. There are 58 countries currently using the capital punishment in the justice system, and 97 countries have decided to completely abolish the death penalty. Canada decided to abolish the death penalty in Canada's criminal law in 1976 and believes that abolition has some positive influence on the Canadian justice system.

One of the controversial issues in recent genetic engineering discussions is whether genetic engineering is ethical. In "Human, Soul, and Genetic Engineering", JC Polkinghorne discusses the ethical state and therapeutic cloning of early embryos. H. H. Brooke's article "Comment: Human, Soul, and Genetic Engineering" is a comment and remark on Polkinghorne's article. On the other hand, John Harris's "Goodbye Dolly?" "Human Cloned Ethics" examines "Possibility of human cloning and possible exploitation", what can be done, its significance, public and official answers It suggests. Genetic engineering is a controversial topic around the world as the country divides and opposes fundamental changes in crops and livestock. According to CSIRO, a simple definition of genetic engineering is "to use modern biotechnology to modify genes of organisms such as plants and animals" (CSIRO, 2007). The technology or steps of genetic engineering are very technical. The first step in genetic engineering is the isolation of DNA from organisms. Once DNA strand Today "genetic engineering is a laboratory technique used by scientists to alter the DNA of living organisms" (Kowalski) and "genetic engineering refers to genes altering or manipulating organisms" (genetic engineering) Regardless of today's expression, all definitions of genetic engineering refer to ways to alter the genetic character of an organism. - Science sometimes looks like a myth or a movie. I heard rumors that human limbs grow from experimental mice, tomatoes crossed with fish, and pigs sharing human DNA. The crazy part is the amount of change food we eat. This is correct, mutated food not only is the truth, it fills our supermarket. Gene mutations are scientific experiments that can compromise moral and moral principles In the field of genetic engineering, we first focus on genetically modified foods and discuss it. Genetic engineering has been on for more than 30 years but scientists have recently begun to acquire genetic engineering skills and are beginning to use them in animals and crops. Since 1996, GM crops have been grown in millions of acres of agricultural land. This technology is a combination of completely different genes that can not be achieved with traditional breeding methods. Genes derived from animals such as fish can be placed in plants such as strawberries to enhance the quality of plants such as strawberries. Fish genes should make strawberry more frost resistant by making strawberry plants antifreeze. In that case, long-term results may not be expected results.

Science can never predict natural behavior, it transcends everything and is very powerful. According to Maslin (2004), the most controversial scientific topic in the 21st century is global warming. People believe that taking two sides, some of which believe there is global warming, others believe that this is just a myth. In this article we prove that global warming is a myth, so if it does not exist we should stop treating it as a problem. The increase in pollution has produced many results in the atmosphere, that is, it can completely change the climate in the future and form a pattern (Long et al. This problem will definitely affect discussions on global warming. "Proof" is thrown away by various people in various ways, everyone is confused. Politically oriented skeptics define terms as undefined, so you can discuss them for your own purposes. However, the lack of definition can lead to confusion for those who want to resolve the answer honestly. It is very difficult to have confidence in such unclear things. Hill recognized that there are more ways to support causality and found two variables to track. In fact, Hill has identified nine separate "certification" chains. Each is an independent case of causality. List of nine aspects - I will explain in detail below - it is now called Hill's standard One of the biggest problems we face now is global warming. The impact on animals and agriculture is truly terrifying and the impact on the population is even more serious. Facts about global warming are often discussed in politics and the media, but unfortunately, even if we are inconsistent with its cause, the impact of global warming is realistic, global, and measurable is. The reason for this is mainly due to us humans, the influence on us is serious. Our growing power dependence on coal-fired power plants releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. 40% of the US carbon dioxide emissions are generated by electricity production, accounting for 93% of the electricity industry emissions. Everyday there are more electronics on the market, but in the absence of a wide range of alternative energy sources, we rely heavily on coal for personal and commercial power.

A black feminist said that the white people Stephanie Philippić and Angela Torchia first said: "This is a house, it is green and white, it is a red door, it is beautiful, this is a family They are very happy in the green and white house, please look at Jane She is wearing red clothes She wants to play. "(Morris, p. 7) 2: Here is green and white And there is a red door, this is a family-run father, Dick and Jane live in green and white time zones. I am very happy to see Jenny wearing a red dress that she wants to play. In the late 1970s and early 1980's, Salvos caused an open debate about black sexual politics and "black men's relationship." Other influential black feminists of this age include Barbara Smith ("Towards Black Feminist Criticism", 1977 article) and the poet Jordan and Oderolod, a scholar. A black feminist storm swept the African American academic world, covered by mainstream media and incorporates the black expression based on gender of creative bias. This polarized light includes exhibitions targeting visual artists and anthologies of black women in the 1980's and criticisms of literature of black females. Black lesbians based on sex and sexual orientation are often excluded from the mainstream black movement, and in mainstream feminism, black lesbian feminists are often excluded from racial lesbian feminism. In the 1970s, with the exclusion of homosexual aversion and lesbians, lesbian feminists created their own feminist part of the mainstream second-party feminist agenda. Lesbian feminism creates a radical agenda of challenging homosexual phobia; to find a place of feminism; for some people to focus on separatism. In addition, some lesbian feminists participated in the movement of the black power and issued a need to include color people. However, the mainstream lesbian feminism does not accept these views on race or sexuality, and feels that black lesbian feminists are excluded from this movement In 1970, the decisive moment of a black lesbian feminist occurred at the Panther Revolutionary People's Constitutional Constitution meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Some black lesbian feminists are facing a group of white lesbian feminists about their race, the only agenda. After the event, several groups organized and organized around the black lesbian politics. For example, in 1973, a nationwide black feminist organization, including the lesbian agenda, was founded. Furthermore, in 1975, the Combahee River Collective was founded on the experiences and emotions of gender differences in feminist movement and racism in black power movement. The main focus of this group is to fight interrelated repressive systems, raise awareness of these systems, and unite but create a group of differences. Finally, in 1978, national black lesbians and gay male allies were founded.

The back of the eyes covered with sugar is dark and quiet, and you are everything. You complained about seeking help by complaining, but no one seemed to hear your voice. You think that your family made you abandon you and sit alone in a narrow cage. There is no place to use the bathroom other than where you stand. The bad smell of your feces is getting worse every second. The only food they will leave for you, you will eat on the first day. The only thing that keeps you alive is your willingness to eat and drink your waste desperately and survive. Animal crusade for animals released from Experimental Cage by Christine Jackson and the recent animal rights debate by Leland C. Clark, Jr "The threat of animal rights movement to endanger scientists" Scientist, September 3, 1990, page 11), indicating that the research community needs new correspondence. In the past, animal rights spokesmen were mocking the same lies, distortions, and semi-truth collections, and the research community refuted these separately. If the previous one proves to be fake, the animal rights group will add a new accusation. Therefore, most researchers' efforts are to counter the myriad new mistakes. There was controversy between animal rights claimants and scientists as to whether animals were used correctly in experimental studies. In addition, the use of animals for such studies can find that the way to cure this disease remains controversial. In my opinion, animals can be used for experimental studies if there is no other choice, and if this is useful for science. Animal rights activists claim that humans and animals are equal, but they should be treated equally, but I do not think that people and animals look equally so animal death is a human death It is not the same as. For this reason, if animals died in science to save lives, promote scientific progress, and generally can benefit human beings, they may be considered morally somewhat moral. There is a fundamental difference between the view of welfare of animals and the philosophy of rights of animals. Further promoting the discussion, particularly in the past 30 years, is the emergence of small but strong animal rights groups, they believe that humans and animals are essentially equal and condemn the use of any animal . Human interests Animal welfare philosophy fundamentally differs from animal rights philosophy because it supports the use of animals responsibly to meet specific human needs. These include dating and exercise, and the use of living for food, clothing, medical research. Animal welfare is to ensure that all animals used by humans meet basic needs such as food, housing and health, and do not suffer unnecessary suffering to meet human needs.

Discussion at Boot Camp In today's society, there is some evidence of crime anywhere. This description comes from the sociologist 's theory that there is no social existence without crime. The government is looking for new ways to deal with these repeated problems. The focus is the investigation of young offenders by the government and the style of those punishments. Ownership of weapons is at least very common among young people in Canada, and one-third to one-quarter of students studied said they had some form of weapons at school last year . So what exactly is the boot camp? These plans were originally used as branches of military training camps, and recruits were formed into soldiers through high-intensity training and physical efforts. Clearly, boys' boot camp is not as intense as these professional adult courses, but the goals and methods are very similar. The definition of training camp is training, structure, and physical activity. Most of the boys who participate in these courses lose control in some way regardless of whether they are rude to authority, lazy and unruly, or actively acting at home or school I will. The boys training camp aims to break these actions of teenagers dramatically by changing the world of children. Given the strict schedule and rigorous supervision of drilling instructors, they will escape from the house. They complete tasks assigned to them, from making beds to cleaning their spaces to completing physical training. The Youth Camp program tends to simulate the training of training camps received by military recruits. Depending on its structure, Singapore's boot camp is different. The only requirement to call a youth program a training camp is that it must have a military style. Daily schedules for training camps in the US are usually different because of various kinds of boot camp structure. Generally, the boot camp will try to finish the 16 hour day from 5:30 am to 9:30 pm. My friend is now at the marine boot camp. Youth camp period is 30 days in Alabama, 90 days in New Pride, Denver, Colorado, 120 days in Washington State, 180 days in New Jersey stabilization and reintegration program, 250 to 250 in New Orleans. 300 days (10) Juvenile training camps (also known as "shocking" or "intensive" imprisonment schemes) are usually state-of-the-art remedial facilities. Usually, in order for a teenager to be in a boot camp, he or she must be declared camped by a judge. We strongly recommend that you consider that most people are not certified or licensed and have little negligence or liability before delegating children or adolescents to the boot camp program. At Wingate, we are practicing "cooperation" rather than "confrontation". We will follow clear rules to maintain security and the effectiveness of the overall plan, but respect and respect each student's own way. Since we have respect and positive attitude towards each student, our therapist works hard to understand everyone.

At first glance, this definition explains well what is a positive behavior, it seems to convince the reader that it is that it helps to compensate past discrimination in good faith, but positive Action involves many different opinions. In this article I will explain various views on positive behavior. Discussion of positive behavior Most Americans are keen on the color blind society. In society, individuals are judged as advantages rather than skin color. That is why Lyndon B. Johnson took positive action in 1964. This is also the reason why Proposal 209 was voted in 1996. These two historical events are driven by the desire for equality. What is the positive behavior? Geraldine Lessing thinks "to take positive or aggressive measures to achieve public policy objectives for equal employment opportunities." What is proposition 209? The new law that it passed was "banned the dissolution of California and local governments In the past few years, the discussion on positive behavior has become a controversial topic. The question now is whether positive behavior is reverse discrimination. Definitely, positive action is "to end discrimination, prevent it from recurring, and take positive measures to create new opportunities that were previously rejected by qualified women and colored people To take ". Positive behavior is very controversial because Americans can not decide what they want. "The results of public opinion polls strongly support" aggressive action "for Americans to create opportunities for women and people of color, but" quota "for" unqualified candidate "and I disagree with "preference". Considering the same "positive behavior" as people support, it is strange to actually put an unqualified person in an inappropriate position. At first glance, this definition explains well what is a positive behavior, it seems to convince the reader that it is that it helps to compensate past discrimination in good faith, but positive Action involves many different opinions. - Discussion of positive behavior Most Americans are keen on the color blind society. In society, individuals are judged as advantages rather than skin color. That is why Lyndon B. Johnson took positive action in 1964. This is also the reason why Proposal 209 was voted in 1996. These two historical events are driven by the desire for equality. What is the positive behavior? Geraldine Lessing thinks "to take positive or aggressive measures to achieve public policy objectives for equal employment opportunities."

During the prewar, the question of slavery affected many religious and political arguments. This is reflected in the discussion of Lincoln Douglas, enactment of laws, and political parties. The political argument that caused slavery conflict arises from legislation. The law that was first established was a 3/5 compromise plan. Of course, the southern states wish to count slaves as a whole as they have more slaves in the south. Northern countries oppose this. DRED SCOTT decision (meaning): The political discussion on slavery within the territory is getting very intense. This is because the Constitution lacks accuracy on this subject. Even if the Supreme Court was sufficiently influenced by the fragmentation bias that is affecting the land at that time, he said in his decision. Free Black Dred Scott, who lives in Illinois (Free State), was brought back to his state of Missouri (slave state) and insisted on being someone's property. He complained of his own freedom, he lives in a free state, he and his family were free, he insisted that he was "free and always free." Supreme Court Justice Taney hates republican ideals and racial equality. Taney's Court decided that Scott was a slave. During the prewar, the question of slavery affected many religious and political arguments. This is reflected in the discussion of Lincoln Douglas, enactment of laws, and political parties. The political argument that caused slavery conflict arises from legislation. The law that was first established was a 3/5 compromise plan. Of course, the southern states wish to count slaves as a whole as they have more slaves in the south. - Thomas Jefferson is a person who really does not need to introduce. He was regarded as a bright writer and appointed to draft the Declaration of Independence. The National Assembly officially approved the "Declaration of Independence" on July 4, 1776. Jefferson has many slaves to work for him. He even even sells his slave to buy another person. He wrote in "The Declaration of Independence" that "everyone was born equally". When Thomas Jefferson included a passage to attack slavery in his draft declaration of independence, it caused the hottest debate among delegates gathered in Philadelphia in the spring and early summer of 1776. The article on Jefferson's slavery is the most important part of the finals. Literature It was replaced by a passage about the temptation of King George to 'Domestic Rebellion between us'. Decades later, Jefferson condemned South Carolina State, Georgia State, and representatives of businessmen who were actively involved in slave trade beyond the Atlantic then backwarded their passage. The first passage on Jefferson's slavery is as follows.

Why is the death penalty accepted in most parts of the US? The process of prosecuting individuals and pronouncing convictions is astronomical, and discussions on whether the death penalty actually acts as a deterrent are fierce. Considering all these, life imprisonment is the most realistic and most effective. The benefit of life sentence far exceeds the death penalty. Death Penalty There is a history of using the death penalty in the United States, but no one has further discussion. The death penalty debate about the death penalty has caused extensive controversy. Please do not select this topic as there is debate. However, the death penalty is a problem that needs to be resolved. Should the death penalty be abolished from our criminal justice system? Well, that depends on who you ask. If you ask me ... No. I personally do not see any problems in the death penalty because there are socially risky criminals and death is the only criminal. ... The author of the book, James Fernner, said "Mentally retarded are not in the death penalty". "If a person's intelligence level is significantly below the average, he is usually considered a mentally retarded person, as it usually records IQ below 70 points and there is no adaptive behavior under 18 years of age The Association, it has three elements: 1. It is significantly lower than the average intellectual function. 2. Associated damage A detailed explanation of the recent death penalty in Illinois, including John J. Kinsella's "Chicago Tribune", the so-called "13 Disclaimers", Rolando Cruz and the prosecutor's discussion. The first state prosecutor in DuPage County. According to opinion polls, Europeans and Canadians are almost as supportive of the death penalty as the Americans, the death penalty: prudent response to malicious acts, investigation by the Ministry of Justice in filing a federal executions to the racial or ethnic prejudice Did not the death penalty save the innocent life? The death penalty of racist God, the death sentence opponents apply erroneous logic, Lieberman's death sentence "investigation" is inaccurate and when a murderer is executed, a nun says the church's bell I'm trying to ring. As usual, innocent victims have no bell

The unique ability needed to allow each person to control their behavior is called free will. Free will is directly related to two other important philosophical issues, freedom of movement and moral responsibility. That is the main reason for discussion. Briefly, a person with free will is an individual's ability to select a policy of action. However, since animals seem to be suitable for this approach, free will is generally considered to be only human, discussion is increasing further (Broad 1990). Discussion of free will is classified / marked in most cases as a discussion between "free will and determinism". This means that if determinism is incompatible with free will (if it is the case), it just needs to indicate that determinism does not necessarily apply, so that automatic possibilities are automatically opened That was a misunderstanding. In other words, when someone opposes free will, many people return to the idea that the universe may not be deterministic, denying this free will becomes their free will and savior. In the philosophical world, the concept that uncertainty contributes to liberation of free will is called free will of liberals (not to be confused with economic / political standpoint). On the other hand, people who accept determinism but still believe in free will be called compatible, and in most cases do this through a defined shift of the term "free will". Today, the discussion between the certainty of quantum mechanics, non - deterministic, unknown interpretation is still vibrant. The problem is that uncertainty seems to open doors to at least free will if we simply call the framework of free will simply as "free will and determinism." However, as many philosophers today tend to resolve determinism and uncertainty with free will, we recommend marking "free will, determinism / non-determinism". The fact that these terms need to be clarified to this extent means that the discussion framework using these terms disrupts the water in the discussion. Since the discussion has a long history that has been described as "free will and determinism", I think that this will be settled soon, so depending on whether these words exist or not, I will "free will and determinism / Non-determinism ". How are you using it?

Theme: What should be solved is that in his work "Oliver DeWitt" Charles Dickens argues that the influence and the environment (cultivation) may lead to criminal acts rather than the specific malice (nature) It seems to be. CON - statement at the beginning of nature: Obviously, Oliver Twist is a novel contrasting the essence of good and the essence of evil. In addition, creating criminals on these pages, rather than affecting the environment, is inherently a bad habit. The characters of Fagin, Oliver, Monks clearly show that this fact proves that nature guides us and shapes us. The paper by Pickwick starts with a very absurd play about clubs and debates and Oliver Twist has a very funny theater about death and absence. The official spokesperson Mrs. Thingummy overcame the death of Oliver's mother, so he was hurting the vicious and black humor. "Lor blessed her heart, no!" Is tasty and clearly satisfied. "Give blessing to her loving heart when I have her, except for two children, she has 13 children, they are all dead, and they are with me to Uruk To endure, bless her loving heart! Think about what your mother is, keep a dear lamb. " Character analysis of Oliver Twist and his reflection on Childhood Dickens' childhood are Oliver twist, the second novel by British writer Charles Dickens, the atrocities of many orphans in London during the Victorian era. It is known for detailed description of treatment. Oliver Twist was the hero of this novel and he endured a tragic life as an orphan. The adventure of Oliver is like a microcosm of the sad life of the lower class. - "Experience may affect the structure and function of the human brain throughout the life cycle, but evidence ... shows early experience may be particularly important" (Rao et al ., 2010). When I was a child, full parenting of my parents has a great influence on optimal biological and psychological development. This includes nerve growth, social, emotional, and cognitive things. Rao et al. (2010) Parenting that is broadly defined as including "warmth, affection and acceptance" (p. 1145)

Tobacco is one of the most widely used recreational drugs in the world, mainly in the form of tobacco, also used for cigars and pipes. Most countries have imposed age restrictions on use, but over 1 billion adults are legally smoking daily. It is a big deal to satisfy this demand. In addition to bringing serious health consequences to smokers themselves, the pollution of the cigarette smoke of other people by the atmosphere makes this an environmental issue. In the past two decades, the attitude has changed rapidly. In developed countries public opinion is against smoking. By the 1990's, the absolute importance of evidence has led the major tobacco companies to admit that their products are harmful and addictive. Many governments substantially increase tobacco taxes to stop smoking and, in most cases, reduce the economic cost of smoking - related diseases. However, although smoking rates are declining in some groups, smoking is increasing in other groups, especially among young women. At the same time industrial regulations of developed countries re-emphasize developing countries and new markets. An important issue in this discussion is whether the government should legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their lifestyle decisions: does tobacco advertising increase tobacco consumption? Can health warnings reduce consumption, even if how many cigarette packs are covered? What is the impact of smoking bans in all public places? [1] One argument to be able to discuss smoking places in a non-smoking area is that smokers can take care of these places without further compromising health (for example, a smokers attend a restaurant You can tidy up the smoking place of the). Two studies have shown that secondhand smoke increases the risk of adolescent and adult smokers respiratory symptoms.47 In the late 1970s, the tobacco industry posed a threat to the viability of SHS risk to non-smokers I realized that it will bring. Correspondingly, they used various methods to weaken and delay the implementation of smoke-free policies 49. The tobacco industry conducted a study that trusts the health effects of SHS under the name of scientific adviser, misleading media and healthcare advocate global network. After the ban on smoking ban, they used the wrong recession to organize the hotel industry. Although civilians recognize that secondhand smoke (SHS) in cigarettes is harmful, many people still believe marijuus SHS is benign. With the legalization of marijuana and the development of the marijuana industry, discussion on whether cannabis should be included in smoking laws is becoming more common. Despite the chemical and physical similarities between cannabis and tobacco smoke, evidence of the lack of cannabis SHS leading to acute cardiovascular disorders is often mistaken for harmless evidence. We investigated whether exposure to transient cannabis SHS causes acute endothelial dysfunction. This argument is very common in society and politics. Experts, politicians, and people insist on whether to legalize marijuana in the United States. Cannabis is a medicine that you can ingest or ingest. It grows from the ground, giving the user a high illusion. It has many names such as Mary Jane, Cush, Grass, Weed, Potted Plants, Green, Marijuana, Marijuana and Chronic. Some say that cannabis is not as bad as alcohol. - To promote the development of chronic disease treatment drugs, you should make major improvements in drug regulation in the United States. In the United States, drug regulation is very important. Congress is authorized to regulate the distribution, manufacture and use of drugs. Congress has authority to regulate medicines through the Bill of Rights. "Congress should not approve unreasonable search and seizure, or cruel and abnormal punishment for drug criminals" (Kaplan)

Clone debate So far, a 6 year old boy dies of painful death and survives only through bone marrow transplantation. His parents will look for games at close range, but no one will help them. The only possible way for them to perfectly match the bone marrow of their son is to clone their son. Unfortunately, this topic has yet to be discussed with the government. Their only children were their wealth for six years. The clones of their sons became apples of their hope to prevent treasure from being buried. The first attempt to clone a clone of discussion was for the group of frogs in 1952. The experiment partially succeeded. Frog cells are cloned into other living frogs, but only one in 1000 is usually developed, and they are all sterile. The remaining surviving frog grows to an unusually large size. In 1993, Jerry Hall, a scientist and director of the George Washington University in vitro laboratory, and his colleague Robert Stillman reported that they successfully cloned the first human embryo. This was the discovery of in vitro fertilization in the 1940's and began aiming to alleviate the suffering of infertile couples. After years of research, science Cloning In recent years, the problem of cloning has been controversial all over the world. A clone is the production of one or more individual plants and animals genetically identical to other plants and animals. There are two types of cloning programs: embryo cloning and adult DNA cloning. Embryonic cloning occurs when sperm cells and egg cells mix in a glass dish. After pregnancy, divide the fertilized egg (fertilized egg) and add nutrients to promote cell division. It is done around the clone. One major difference is that this article is about cloning animals, not humans. There are many questions about cloning, including cloning, how to make clones of animals, etc. Perhaps this is just an environmental issue, such as the possibility that cloning can lead to all forms of pollutants. Cloning animals is not as quick as the Star Wars process, but the method of cloning animals is beneficial to humans. Understanding the clones will be a praise A major problem in cloning discussion is the combination of two different types of clones. The general public believes that reproduction is the creation of late twins, and in fact only explains reproductive reproduction. When most people think about cloning, they imagine crazy scientists who produce fake people in some dark, secret laboratories. In fact, this is far from the facts that people can get. Medicine is far from the creation of practical talent. However, we are closer to finding the skills necessary to prepare cell and tissue samples that are essential for the treatment and possible healing of many debilitating diseases.

Although William Shakespeare's work is the most popular concept, historians have a lot of evidence and discussion, Shakespeare is a pseudonym for Edward Devil, Count Oxford has to hide for social and political reasons did not. I am a writer. After studying historian evidence carefully, this theory has not been confirmed, and Shakespeare is in fact a true author. The world began accepting William Shakespeare in 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. Early in the mid-nineteenth century various group theories of Shakespearean writers were proposed. The first published book was fully focused on the discussion of the authors published in 1857 by the Shakespeare drama philosophy published by Delia Bacon. It proposed the first "group theory" and worked on Sir Francis Bacon, "a group of disappointed and failed politicians" led by Sir Walter Raleigh, probably Edmund Spencer, with Sir Buhurst and Edward Devil, The 17th Earl of Oxford For more information on people who do not agree with me, please see Shakespeare - Earl of Oxford. This site will explore Shakespeare's writers' discussion over the 2nd century. The purpose of the Association is to document and establish Edward Devil as a prominent author of William Shakespeare's work, so their website is against my own argument. Read it and weigh the evidence by yourself At 6:30 pm on Saturday, September 15, Alexander War will discuss the identity of Shakespearean writers at the historic Myers Park near From Craig, Earl of Oxford, Ascis. This discussion is part of Shakespeare's weekend and is sponsored by Professor Gerard Kilroy. At 2 pm on Sunday, September 16, the Elyria Venetian merchant performed at the Causeway Elizabeth Theater. The food and drink tickets for each event are £ 30. Shakespeare Writers Trust and other charitable organizations were donated. For details and ticket booking please see Shakespeare's weekend.

Ignorance in Immigration Controversy One of the most hotly debated issues today is the problem immigrants enter the United States. I compared this issue with the racial discrimination problem, but whatever you do, they are always there, ignorance alone will ignore the problem. The fact that most of the recent immigrants are not Caucasian makes this issue more competitive. As Charles S. Clark stated in "New Immigrants", "In the 1990s, Americans who grew up in Anglo-Saxon society had to adapt to officials born in Poland in the history of white people." John Chairman of Shalikashvili Long-Term Joint Meeting; Spanish version "But my ancestors came here legally." Others explained that they ignored the difficulty of doing so until the 1920s. To some extent, I would like to deal with some of the extra, less appreciated aspects of chain transfer that I think were forgotten. Yes, I understand. "Chain immigration" is a term of anti-immigration and racial discrimination, but it is not necessarily the case. Before being chosen and contaminated by a white nationalist, it was considered a neutral phrase and was widely used in the field from census to genealogy. As their ancestors performed long distance tagging games, most Americans end here, and "chaining" meant telling a connection through this cross-border effort. Ignorance in Immigration Controversy One of the most hotly debated issues today is the problem immigrants enter the United States. I compared this issue with the racial discrimination problem, but whatever you do, they are always there, ignorance alone will ignore the problem. The fact that most of the recent immigrants are not Caucasian makes this issue more competitive. As Charles S. Clark stated in "New Immigrants", "In the 1990s, Americans who grew up in Anglo-Saxon society had to adapt to officials born in Poland in the history of white people." John Chairman of Shalikashvili Long-Term Joint Meeting; Spanish version In the past few years, immigration issues have become a concern of the United States. Discussion on this subject is in progress. But the main focus of these discussions is to address the growing level of prohibition against immigrants and to improve the conditions for empowering immigrants. The economic standard of the country clearly shows the level of immigration. Analyzing various economic factors will help create a reliable framework for resolving US immigration debate. - This United States does not like undocumented immigrants, especially women. Cruel immigration prevention laws, policies and practices had a particularly serious impact on immigrant women and their families. These measures forces immigrant women to choose between the threat of abusing their husbands and the threat of being expelled. Immigration policy can also detain women and leave children

Introduction to discussions on uniforms ============ This is a question about whether uniforms should be mandatory. I will explain the advantages and disadvantages. I will write my own conclusion - the advantage of wearing uniforms is a good argument. First of all, you can represent the school in the public, give the school a good name, and encourage the students to act outside the school campus. Article: Discussion about uniforms is still available, but school uniform announcement increases student's academic severity, creating a more coherent and friendly student's atmosphere Any uniform Prejudice and social group. It is no doubt that clothing and therefore all schools in the United States should approve uniforms. Introduction is the most difficult and important part of this paper. Yes, you have stored the most important and effective details in the body of the article You can say that the reader was "captured" or "t" when he or she reached even your first line. First pass through the body Discussion on the background of school uniforms In some countries, such as the UK and Caribbean countries, at the end of compulsory education, especially for 16 years, school students need to wear special uniforms identified in specific institutions. In France and the United States, we rarely wear uniforms, but some private schools are wearing uniforms. In both cases, the tolerance of uniforms remains controversial ... the discussion on uniform policy is to maintain a little bit of safety with the public; is freedom abandoned? Uniforms have existed for centuries, but the public schools in the United States were recently introduced in 1979 as a way to counter the differences in the social status of students. Today, school uniform policy is seen as a way to fight violence in the school system in the United States. Collin's English Dictionary online defines a uniform as a prescribed identification card Over the past few years, many boards of education have talked about students' problems in school uniforms. Several schools have adopted this policy in the school policy, and several other schools are still discussing this issue. Uniforms are small changes for students, but effective and highly desirable. Wearing uniforms is useful in many ways. Firstly, by matching clothes, all the students can feel equally. Poor students are not wearing clothes of designer brands like wealthy children, so they are no longer excluded. Furthermore, since everyone is wearing the same clothes, social position is no longer a problem. One of the biggest reasons for opposing school uniforms is that students lose their sense of sex. I believe that uniforms will improve students' individuality because they must be represented by their own personality and attitudes, not expensive shoes or brand jeans.

"The most beautiful necklace a mother can wear is not gold or jewelry, but her child has her neck" (a quotation that strongly appeals in the heart). Children are special gifts to God and have a purpose in this world. Because of the legitimacy of abortion in the United States today, some people say that mothers have the right to conclude pregnancy. Is it really "correct" to end pregnancy? Termination of pregnancy means to clear the baby through the pill and in some cases surgically remove the fetus. This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I decided to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. Both sides raised many topics in the discussion of abortion. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as human life. Because professional life believes that life begins with a concept, abortion is like murder, it is an act of robbing human life. now No matter where you are, abortion is a controversial topic in today's society. In this article we will look at two aspects of abortion problems. I will briefly introduce the discussion of abortion to include the morality of the situation first. Next, I will explain the discussion of Pro-Life. Finally, I will introduce the view of Pro-Choice. The final analysis shows how utility, altruism and situation ethics apply to abortion. Take into account the extreme controversy of the surroundings The symmetry resulting from the analysis of the main arguments on both sides of the discussion on abortion can explain why it seems difficult to solve the discussion on abortion. Consider the following discussion of standard anti-pregnancy abortion: the fetus is a human being and living. Human beings have the right to life. Therefore, the fetus has the right to live. Of course, women have the right to control their bodies, but the right of life is beyond the rights of women who control their bodies. Therefore, abortion is wrong. Judith Thomson (1971) argues that this argument fails even if a person gives the right of life to the fetus (for discussion only). Thomson encourages you to imagine that you are connected when you are sleeping, that blood is in the blood, and that you are a famous violinist. Violinists with rare blood disorders will die if they break it. Thomson believes that you have the right to disconnect you. In 1971, Dr. Judith Jarvis Thomson evoked decades of intense controversy over miscarriage through a series of analogies. To survive (Finnis 1973; Thomson 1971; Williams 2004). Thomson considers the right to fetal life to be secondary, as women have the right to control their bodies during pregnancy. In essence, this argument is that mothers' autonomy may not be bound by any living thing - not bound to fetuses, fathers and families - and society - or society -

Millions of people prefer to gamble with gambling prohibitions regardless of casino games, lotteries, or gaming on the global network. Some of gambling, but there is also that there is a possibility that such as alcohol and cancer addiction to destroy the life, there is a fun way for the other person, the gambling There are positive and negative aspects. Whether it is enough to gamble for us because negative attitude as it is addictive. Gambling is everywhere. Some countries tried to ban different forms of gambling, but the rise of online gambling gave citizens around the world the opportunity to find the desire of gambling. If you get the chance to gamble easily, you can make it easier and more convenient for the player to gamble. If it is difficult to gain an opportunity to gamble, the efforts necessary to gain these opportunities may cause some people to leave before they gain the opportunity to gamble. But if the chances of gambling are as easy as clicking links or putting some money in the machine, the strange flutter can easily become a more engaging activity. Online gambling is subject to more stringent regulations. The 1961 Federal Telegraphic Transfer Law banned interstate sports, but other forms of gambling were not involved. It was the subject of the lawsuit. In 2006 the Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) does not prohibit online gambling explicitly but prohibits financial transactions including online gambling service providers. Some offshore gambling providers respond by terminating services to US customers. However, other operators bypass UIGEA and continue to provide services to US customers. For this reason, UIGEA has been criticized by celebrities in the game industry. Unregulated gambling was a matter of course in early mining town in Nevada but was banned in 1909 as part of a nationwide anti-gambling campaign. The reduction and the agricultural sector decline of mine production volume of the Great Depression era, March 19, 1931, Nevada has legalized gambling with the approval of the parliament. The signature of Fred B. Balzar governor has set the most free divorce law in this country and started gambling. The federal government submitted a construction contract of $ 49 million for the Boulder Dam (now Hoover Dam) reformed after 8 days.

Over the past few decades gun control has become the focus of political and mass media controversy. It is no wonder that people have been afraid of guns following recent school shooting and church attacks. People started to look at guns as objects of death and destruction, not their intent. Guns are used in war but are not aimed at killing innocent people The purpose of the gun is to be used by experienced gunners for protection and hunting. Discussion on gun control The discussion on gun control has recently become very popular. People question whether guns are really needed. Others want to know that if the government provides that they have the right to have a gun crime rate, the number of deaths in the United States will decrease. Some people think that guns should not be attributed to death, "guns do not kill people, people kill people." If they are convinced of their claim, how can you conclude which claims are right? There are always two aspects of the constitution, which are excluded. The Bill of Rights was approved on December 15, 1791. (Constitution of the United States) There were major criticisms, especially in recent years, due to the revision of the Constitution. The subject of gun control is controversial and related issues are submitted to the Supreme Court. The second amended country states: "A well-controlled militia is necessary for the security of free countries, the citizens have the right to hold and carry weapons and not violate it. Gun regulation One of the most recent problems in our society is argument about gun control. There are many questions about who should possess a gun and how to obtain these particular guns. The big issue is that our constitution has the right to possess firearms. I want to know when the government should draw a line. Statistics is not the only indicator that firearms will adversely affect our society. A story of a parent who lost his child, or a child's life every day for guns (Capps). Recently, two young boys were shot while leaving the high school football game. In this incident, two students fired at Columbine's classmates Can not imagine the fear of my classmates being shot! Many other related gun violence caused gun control issues. An increasingly controversial discussion

Euthanasia: In the discussion recently concluded by the Canadian Medical Association, "One doctor in five people said that if this act was legalized they said they were happily receiving euthanasia ... more than once - - 42% - They said they will refuse this. "(Kirkey 1). Euthanasia is defined as the right to cause patients to die early with the help of doctors and legislators from many countries, including the US, are considering legalizing this practice. Due to the nature of the program, euthanasia is a controversial topic in the moral world, and moral argument involves legal arguments. Euthanasia can be rephrased as "good death" literally. Euthanasia is ideally used to accelerate the death process of terminal patients so that they can overcome any pain they can endure. Euthanasia is also thought to be a process of brain death patients being liberated from life support, which is called "suicide assistance" by many people. There are mainly two kinds of euthanasia; passive euthanasia means detention or discontinuation of a specific treatment, meaning that the patient dies and positively euthanizes it. Euthanasia, also known as assisting suicide, is a Greek word, it is easy to die. The two types of euthanasia being discussed in our society today are passive and active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is an act of discontinuing treatment that may prolong the life span, active euthanasia is an act of positively causing death by applying a fatal injection. Euthanasia is not murder because it only occurs at the request of the patient. Murder is the result of hatred, anger and revenge, but euthanasia is the motivation of mercy. According to this argument, the governments of the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon have legalized the form of euthanasia.

The death penalty is a form of justice that has been used for a long time by humans. Mankind has been using the death penalty since the history, and many countries use it to punish criminals. In the past criminal families and criminals have been punished. In Macedonia and Athens, if a person commits a crime such as betrayal or betrayal, that punishment is the death of them and their children (Peggs, 1839). Today, there are countries that use more capital punishment than other countries, so there are many discussions about the death penalty. When discussing the death penalty, the death penalty can keep many positions. In Jonathan Glover 's "Execution" article, he believes that a person may have three views on the death penalty. Glover recognizes that statistical and intuitive evidence can not prove the benefits of the death penalty, but he believes that society is useful, so he can be regarded as a Utilitarian. It will appear many times in the future. Some citizens think that the death penalty is morally wrong, but in today's society it is necessary for various reasons. Society must keep safety from the atrocities of murder and rapists, deprive of their lives, and to demonstrate their roles and abilities in our society. Most offenders did not consider the results of their actions. If you are going to commit a crime, let's meet another criminal One problem associated with the disorder and division of the whole American society is the death penalty. Indeed, the death penalty, of course, is a complex discussion, people do not seem to agree with the decision on this issue, which is why I think this is a very interesting topic. Actually, the death penalty has been going on for a long time, but that is still a practical matter. The debate between the people opposed to the death penalty and those opposed to the death penalty was intense and all parties showed good support and justification for their position on this subject.

People can get blue, hazel or brown eyes from their parents, and freckles from others. But where did their singing talents and skills come from? In other words, they make them personal. Is it predetermined in the genes, or is it taught to them by family members and friends? My general psychology lecturer recently explained about nature and cultivation games, but neither side was on either side. Discussion on nature and cultivation is one of the oldest problems in psychology. Discussions between nature and nature and cultivation of cultivation are related to the relative importance of individual's innate traits and personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral characteristics. (Ridley, Matt. "The reason why you became you" Times magazine. May 25, 2003). Most people in all relevant fields have an opinion on which is more important, more natural, or more cultivated. Thomas Bouchard, director of Twins Research Group in Minnesota, believes in the following. Nature - Will you cultivate our natural, natural trends, or products of reflections of experience and growth? This is a discussion of the famous "nature and cultivation". For decades psychologists have discussed how much genetics or genes and the environment or experience will have on thinking and behavior. Lifelong mind, way of body-to-heart contact Many psychologists think that what we experience (thinking and feelings, etc.) and our biological processes (thinking and emotions etc.) and our biological I am fascinated by the relationship with the relationship between processes (nervous system activity, etc.). . How do you explain five sustainable issues that attract psychologists from various fields of psychology? For decades scientists and biologists have discussed arguments between nature and cultivation. This discussion is about how much our environment and genetics influence our behavior and developmental stages. According to this argument, nature can explain that human behavior occurs due to its genetic makeup. Because human behavior is due to its genetic structure, it should also affect the lifelong development and development of (natural) people. - A famous psychologist Jerome Kagan once said "Genes and families may decide the foundation of the house but time and place determine its form" (Moore 165). Discussion about nature and cultivation has been a mystery for many years and always appeals doubts about whether human behavior, thinking and feelings were born over time. Natural or genetic influences are formed before birth and fine tuned through initial experience

Adoption of transgender is not surprising as the problem affecting children raises a strong interest and emotion; inclusion of ethnically or ethnically different parents and children in adoption family is a controversial subject is. Adoption of transgender not only affects how much power the country must have in family life but also influences the level of national aid given to families in need before expelling parents from their parents Exert. Regardless of the various benefits of adopting transgender, it is regrettable that active discussions continue on that ban. Ironically, however, opinion polls show that the majority of black Americans and whites are supporting inter-racial adoption. For example, in a study of 975 adults conducted by CBS in 1991, 70% of whites like them, 71% prefer them. From the above, in the United States in the United States a wide range of public support gathered to restrict the use of racial, cultural or ethnic identity to prevent or delay the adoption of foster parents among ethnic groups, multi-ethnic resettlement The law was adopted. In fact, the purpose of the Federal Bill is to reduce the time for children to be raised at foster parents and orphanages by promoting adoption between ethnic groups. Ethnic adoption papers should explain what transgender adoption is. In fact, it provides families and families for children with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds than their parents who would use them. Every child is equal and needs the love and care of his parents. The author may be concerned about procedures and requirements for adopting such a child. It is also necessary to consider objections to this topic. Therefore, dealing with such controversial ideas is not an easy task. The controversy over adoption needs to understand the many aspects and problems you are using. What would you do if you want my parents to come back to the children? How about a social reception at a child? Can adopted children give enough love and feeling to support their intellectual development to the children? Adoption is the beginning of a new permanent relationship, is this going on for a while? These are some of the problems surrounding adoption.

Throughout the United States, students sit on the table during standardized testing. When students take the exam, the teacher goes up and down in the classroom while praying that they can remember the information presented by the students. Several children sit and relax in front of the desk, quietly fill the bubbles and answer essay questions. These children are well prepared and ready to handle their tests. But the other children sit on their desk, think about the problem and try to guess the answer. Discussions on standardized tests stand out, especially for high school students, their teachers, their parents and carers. Because of the dispute surrounding them, standardized tests often create headlines. In California, people are talking about some areas that are about to be excluded from standardized testing requirements. What is the purpose of the standardization test? Objectively measure student achievement degree. The problem of their objectivity has made many students, parents, teachers and school districts want to know the real scope of the test. Are they concerned? Teaching, not teaching Standardized testing is one of the hottest debates in education. Educational experts have different views on this topic. The standard test is a test method that a candidate must accept the same evaluation procedure set by the test staff. These procedures are intended to be examined and scored as part of a wider range of student bodies. There are two types of standardization tests: ability test and score test. The aptitude test examines students' advanced skills and abilities. - As children grow, some of their horrible memories include going to the first day of a dentist or elementary school. Perhaps their biggest nightmare is a standardized test. Since I started school as a first year student, students have been taught to test in the USA. In many cases, students enter the cram school and even block for the lower grades.

"The most beautiful necklace a mother can wear is not gold or jewelry, but her child has her neck" (a quotation that strongly appeals in the heart). Children are special gifts to God and have a purpose in this world. Because of the legitimacy of abortion in the United States today, some people say that mothers have the right to conclude pregnancy. Is it really "correct" to end pregnancy? Termination of pregnancy means to clear the baby through the pill and in some cases surgically remove the fetus. This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I decided to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. Both sides raised many topics in the discussion of abortion. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as human life. Because professional life believes that life begins with a concept, abortion is like murder, it is an act of robbing human life. now No matter where you are, abortion is a controversial topic in today's society. In this article we will look at two aspects of abortion problems. I will briefly introduce the discussion of abortion to include the morality of the situation first. Next, I will explain the discussion of Pro-Life. Finally, I will introduce the view of Pro-Choice. The final analysis shows how utility, altruism and situation ethics apply to abortion. Take into account the extreme controversy of the surroundings The symmetry resulting from the analysis of the main arguments on both sides of the discussion on abortion can explain why it seems difficult to solve the discussion on abortion. Consider the following discussion of standard anti-pregnancy abortion: the fetus is a human being and living. Human beings have the right to life. Therefore, the fetus has the right to live. Of course, women have the right to control their bodies, but the right of life is beyond the rights of women who control their bodies. Therefore, abortion is wrong. Judith Thomson (1971) argues that this argument fails even if a person gives the right of life to the fetus (for discussion only). Thomson encourages you to imagine that you are connected when you are sleeping, that blood is in the blood, and that you are a famous violinist. Violinists with rare blood disorders will die if they break it. Thomson believes that you have the right to disconnect you. In 1971, Dr. Judith Jarvis Thomson evoked decades of intense controversy over miscarriage through a series of analogies. To survive (Finnis 1973; Thomson 1971; Williams 2004). Thomson considers the right to fetal life to be secondary, as women have the right to control their bodies during pregnancy. In essence, this argument is that mothers' autonomy may not be bound by any living thing - not bound to fetuses, fathers and families - and society - or society -

In today's society, things that explain the reviews of guns at home can easily be found in newspapers, magazines, or television. When reading or seeing such a comment, looking at the problem in a certain way may affect someone. My goal is not to persuade you to be in a particular direction but to see the problem from different perspectives. When you see these two arguments you will face your own opinion and decide to agree to your own choice, change your perspective and cross the topic in a new way maybe. The discussion of gun control in the United States continues over the precise situation of the shooting currently being broadcast. Is the new shooting method worth it? This depends on whether you can prevent this special shot. This is an understandable human reaction, but it is the worst way to save lives. Political attention to mass shootings may even weaken policies aimed at addressing the overall situation of violence. Opponents of universal background research attempted to weaken the Democratic Party's efforts to promote reform. And pointed out that large archer's murder weapons are usually legally purchased. But that is not a point. A background check to expand private sales of firearms is a strategy aimed at helping fight the illegal market of firearms used in daily gun violence. Many people have expressed their views clearly on gun control issues, but the discussion is complicated and both sides have strong supporters. After the mass bombardment case, the pros and cons of gun control became the focus of discussion. However, support for banning and reform by the federal government is still elusive. Even the catastrophic attack at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December 2012 failed to reach an agreement on the background investigation of purchasing guns. 1. Massacre of guns is most frequently used with legitimate weapons. Supporters of parent gun control believe that more stringent gun law may prevent these crimes Gun control is becoming an increasingly controversial topic in the country, depending on the continuing debate over gun control and whether guns are more difficult to obtain under law. Guns are used for a variety of purposes, from good to bad. Guns are not for everyone. Some people handle the gun incorrectly, others use the gun inappropriately. Recently, guns are a problem in our society. - The gun does not kill people, people kill people. Regardless of whether you are doing your own business, joining the army, or staying home to raise a family, the American dream can work hard to make what makes you happy. I am afraid that your dream will be robbed. Over the past few years, mass shoots and attacks on schools are regrettably a general tragedy.

In the United States, our citizens have certain security rights, one of which is the second amendment. The second amendment stated, "A well-controlled militia is necessary for the security of free countries, and the rights of people holding and carrying weapons should not be infringed." It is still important. The first is the right for law-abiding citizens to possess weapons, the second is due to the crime rate of these weapons, and the third is the distribution of weapons. Gun regulation One of the most recent problems in our society is argument about gun control. There are many questions about who should possess a gun and how to obtain these particular guns. The big issue is that our constitution has the right to possess firearms. I want to know when the government should draw a line. Statistics is not the only indicator that firearms will adversely affect our society. A story of a parent who lost his child, or a child's life every day for guns (Capps). Recently, two young boys were shot while leaving the high school football game. In this incident, two students fired at Columbine's classmates Can not imagine the fear of my classmates being shot! An increasingly controversial argument that many other related gun violence caused gun control issues After the country experienced another group gunfire incident known as "the second deadly shoot incident at a public school in the US" - how to "regulate" how to save gun control and life and why Discussion - - Keep angry with familiar indicators of frustration and social irresponsibility. President Cardinal's reaction to this national crisis was unsuccessful in defining his title as "Supreme Commander" due to meaningless roar and irritation, so we have a clear sympathy and suggestive consistency It is expected to be lost. Body language to prove his incompetence degree - no doubt When the police tried to elucidate what the motive of the paddock is, the tragedy again caused a national debate about gun control. The United States has guns more than any other developed countries - and gun violence is more. Will more stringent gun control law help to reduce the number of deaths related to guns? Like the province, Congress has been divided about this problem for a long time. When the police tried to pinpoint the cause of the paddock killing, the tragedy again caused a national debate about gun control. There are more guns in the US than any other advanced country. There are also violence by guns. Will more stringent gun control law help to reduce the number of deaths related to guns? Like the province, Congress has been divided about this problem for a long time.

Since its inception, guns are the best means of self-defense for humanity, helping to expand the borders, and help many people, including Americans, gain and protect their rights and democracy I helped to support. Even today, our troops are using firepower to prevent tyranny politics from spreading all over the world. We call our power "military", recognizing the need to maintain our firepower throughout human history, and guns helped shape this history. Talk of gun control and gun control was a hot debate for decades. In her speech on Newtown Shooting, announced on 21 December 2012, Vice President Wayne Lapierre discussed the issue of gun control and claimed that the gun is not the cause of gun violence. LaPierre's project is to replace the gun control, to reduce the number of guns and increase the number of guns to solve the problem of gun violence. As an argument, American journalist Nicholas Christop said in his diary "Do you have the courage to stop it?" In response to President Obama's administrative measures on gun control, we are discussing guns of different rounds. Last September, during the New Year of the Jewish people I preached about Jewish morality and gun control. And then it was published in Huffington Post. Since publication, I have heard advocates who support and oppose gun control. I learned a lot through dialogue, but I am optimistic that as a society we can listen to each other and progress on this problem if I can learn. I think that I have universal information Extract ethical questions from my own special tradition. In that preaching, I outlined the fact that Judaism has strong self-defense ethics, including the ability to have weapons (Berachot 58a). However, it has a strong position as well and you should not have unnecessary dangerous goods in your house (Bava Kamma 46a), you are prohibited from offering weapons to dangerous people ( Avodah Zarah 15b) Gun control is a problem which is often discussed. Some are professional gun regulators, those who believe in gun control are unconstitutional. Many political leaders and organizations have strong opinions on gun control. It enabled the discussion of gun control to be announced. Gun control restricts or gets the rights of citizens carrying or purchasing guns. - Demosthenes and Isocrates started taking the initiative in the 4th century BC. Athens is a speaker and a politician. Isocrates is a teacher of rhetoric or art speaking in public, Demosthenes is a professional litigator who writes for clients to discuss in the court and presents occasional arguments.

The Constitution of the United States came into effect on March 4, 1789. It was fixed 27 times. The first 10 fixes are called the Bill of Rights. It includes precious liberties that the Creator thinks it needs and is excluded from the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was approved on December 15, 1791. (Constitution of the United States) There were major criticisms, especially in recent years, due to the revision of the Constitution. The subject of gun control is controversial and related issues are submitted to the Supreme Court. Gun control gun control is one of the topics discussed in the near future. Regarding debate and controversy regarding more stringent law enforcement concerning the possession of firearms, the discussion on gun control is infinite. There is no justification or error in having a gun, but the way people exploit the modifications to carry weapons is wrong. In recent years, more and more problems have arisen due to large shooting and innocent people being shot. Gun control policy needs to be more rigorous. According to the US Justice Department, guns should not be used, and 78% of police authorities use pistols (Welford 2005). From 1977 to 1996, the US gun industry produced 39,024,786 pistols, but at the same time it produced 50 million rifles and shotguns. Not only do our troops and police need weapons to carry out their daily lives, they are also a major income source for the United States (Fernandez 2002). When James Madison proposed the bill The reporter's so-called gun debate is not actually a debate. In front of the arbitrator who decided the voting method, there are countless suspicious statistics. Gun control Democrats believe that all gun control laws are worth fighting as long as they can save human lives. Republicans replied that guns can not make a difference. They learned that aggressive weapons played an important role in many large shooting cases but they only played a minor role in the overall problem of gun violence in the United States . The federal government's aggressive weapons ban in 1994, which expired in 1994, did not clearly demonstrate the reduction of gun violence. As a result of thoroughly evaluating the law, it was concluded that even a more comprehensive prohibition could be "the smallest influence and too little for reliable measures."

Gay marriage is a matter that has been discussed for decades. This is one of the most controversial issues people can discuss, and most typically, people have a very strong view on whether they should be legal. Everyone thinks that the view on homosexual marriage is "right", but there is a strong argument between them. People who believe they should be legitimate usually take the position that "all love is equal", and those who think that it is illegal are often prone to "gay marriages are unnatural" . In recent years, discussions on homosexual marriage have become a national debate, causing a statement in Congressional Hall, the White House, dozens of state legislatures and courts, and national elections. And state level. As the debate goes deeper, American religious groups still have big differences between this issue and the moral problem of homosexuality. Discussion has evolved from occasional occasions in a few states to the people and the world. The views on the possibility of homosexuality and the same sex marriage have also experienced shaking changes over the past decade. A discussion on gay marriage has increased, Massachusetts became the first country to allow homosexual marriage in 2003, 56% think that traditional American families will be destroyed when allowing homosexual marriages, Was 39%. Today, 46% believe that same-sex marriage destroys traditional homes, but slightly more (51%) are opposed The institutionalization of same-sex marriage in public education has cleverly but universally changed the rights of parents. The discussion on how to establish a gay marriage in the classroom closely resembles a discussion about pretending to be a government-based pre-school-based place of sex education and a government to exercise sovereignty over children. However, sex education is always an individual matter, in a sense sex education can not penetrate the whole curriculum. Gay marriage is in a different footing. One of the new orthodox principles is that homosexual relationships should receive the same respect that we give to marriage, so their supporters require a forward explanation of same-sex marriage in the classroom It was a great success. Curriculum reforms in jurisdictions like British Columbia are currently preventing their parents from exercising their long vetoed rights against controversial educational practices. 12 years

There are many controversial topics in this politically correct world. Topics on ethics, standards, and personal ethics. However, one of the recent controversial topics is a new century approach to promoting individual votes through electronic balloting. Electronic voting is a way to use a touch screen electronic voting machine to vote for voters. There are many advantages to using these machines during the election, but there are a number of disadvantages to using them. In this article we will evaluate the discussion about electronic balloting and its impact on big data. I will investigate what some countries are doing and explore the challenges posed by the process of making online voting an American vote. After analyzing the impact of electronic balloting, this paper summarizes the analysis and recommendations. Electronic voting or Internet voting has been done in dozens of countries. Several European countries have conducted electronic balloting tests, but some of them have been suspended. In this section, we will explain those who are already experimenting with Internet voting technology and have achieved some degree of success and achieved electronic voting. They include Australia, Estonia, Switzerland The main topic of policy debate on voting technology since 2000 is the computer's role in voting records and summarization. Electronic voting machines that use only electronic devices to record votes without paper backup records are controversial. Roy Saltman and Rebecca Mercuri's research questioned the wisdom of using a paperless voting system before 2000, but the explosive growth of the DRE since 2000 has raised a controversy. Electronic balloting (also called electronic balloting) is a term that includes various types of voting, including electronic balloting methods and electronic balloting methods. E voting system is a voting system in which election data is recorded, stored and processed mainly as digital information. The electronic voting technique may include a remote Internet voting system, an optical scanning voting system, and a specialized voting booth. Sanjay et al. (May 2011) also defines an electronic ballot as a system that uses electronic systems instead of voting ballots. Sanjay further explained that this digital stored electronic ballot was transferred from the voting system to the counting system. Electronic voting can be regarded as a better form of voting to eliminate some of the shortcomings of traditional voting systems.

They want people to choose to own a gun. The most famous lobby for gun rights is NRA. If NRA is sponsored by the National Rifle Association, NRA's job is to ask people with the right to own a gun. If that person chooses to sponsor NRA, they send some money back. With this money, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission can dispatch more powerful people to Congress and explain why they should reserve gun rights. The gun 's rights hall provides many identical or similar perspectives. For example, many times they return to the second revision and we have the right to own a gun. Gun control and gun rights are important issues that have been debated over the years. Some people think civilians should not have the right to own a gun, others think that our god has the right to have weapons. The second amendment of the Bill of Rights is "We need a well-managed militia for the security of free countries, people have the right to hold and carry weapons and not infringe them" Says. This has been a social right for many years and is one of the main reasons. Each country is intensifying discussions about gun control. Advocates of anti-gun control said that the second amendment guarantees that everyone has the right to acquire weapons, but the second amendment is regarded as a collective right to hold weapons, It is the only thing you own. Correct militia. This article will analyze the validity of several different articles that provide discussion to support and oppose gun control. Articles by Charles W. Collier "Cannon control in the US: France murder under the age of 50. It is estimated that there are about 270 million guns in the US The history of the United States and its past gun policy The history of gun control to investigate can give US views on gun ownership. Since the 1960 's, gun control has been discussed by Americans (Dolan 1). The debate questioned the rights of Americans with weapons including pistols, shotguns, and rifles. Some people say that simple restrictions on these weapons are in order, but others believe that these weapons should be completely banned (Dolan 1). Both sides have a strong opinion and often cause conflicts and confusion among American citizens. But the opponent agrees that the death rate will be 30 million ... gun control: For us worse than we know, most of us who live in this country like that You should see the debate. There may be people who have never heard formal discussions, but many groups and individuals are working on informal gun control debate. It is unlikely that someone has heard of that person. Remember the situation when you are traveling or waiting for places to hear the pros and cons of gun debate.

Evaluation of Discussion on Free Trade On 4th October 1988, Canada and the United States signed a Canada - US Free Trade Agreement (FTA). This agreement gradually abolished most of the tariffs and trade barriers between Canada and the US in 10 years. In addition, its export reduction regulations prohibit export taxes on energy, expand domestic treatment to US companies conducting business in Canada, and vice versa, and establish dispute resolution teams. This agreement will help eliminate trade outside the growing protectionism by US and Canadian politicians while protecting Canada's "Culture, Regional Development and Farm Marketing Committee". This article will study those political arguments Based on a contemporary discussion surrounding the 10th anniversary of the Central American Free Trade Agreement and the North American Free Agreement, this paper analyzes the social, political, economic and theological influences of free trade and the freedom in North America We propose a theological response to trade. Trade contract In this article, I participated in modern theology. In this article we will discuss ways of prayer that may be called "quasi-people" in Christian Meditation and Center Prayer - of the two Christian men today. A word or mantra. First of all, in this article I will explain the practices seen in Christian meditation and central prayer. Next, we examine many differences between the two traditions in a way that management methods are used. Third, it will try to explain the prayer of this Christian pointer according to Indian-Tibetan religious tradition spells. Discussions for defending or refusing international free trade between countries have been strengthened. However, the discussion on how the trading system should be free is a matter of old discussion, and as time goes on, various discussions and positions are circulating. In the US people who support free trade believe that consumers of free trade have many benefits and these supporters have several reasons to support their claim. As the debate grows, the benefits of free trade can not be assumed

Standardized testing is one of the hottest debates in education. Educational experts have different views on this topic. Standard test is a test method that the student must accept the same evaluation procedure set by the person in charge of the exam. These procedures are intended to be examined and graded as part of a wider student body. There are two types of standardization tests: ability test and score test. The aptitude test examines students' advanced skills and abilities. In the achievement test, we evaluate the students' understanding at the formal educational institution and confirm their grade and understanding of key concepts. Discussions on standardized tests stand out, especially for high school students, their teachers, their parents and carers. Because of the dispute surrounding them, standardized tests often create headlines. In California, people are talking about some areas that are about to be excluded from standardized testing requirements. What is the purpose of the standardization test? Objectively measure student achievement degree. The problem of their objectivity has made many students, parents, teachers and school districts want to know the real scope of the test. Are they concerned? Teaching, not teaching Standardized testing is not a new concept, it is used from the mid-1990s through the latter half. However, "high risk" of focusing on standardized testing is so. The method related to the standardized test is controversial. Those who agree with the standardized tests, I think that the test creates a system that can improve the score and responsibility of the teachers, students and school districts across the country. - Almost all high school students accept this. Standard test. Tests like SAT and ACT are used to measure student performance in college life but these tests are not necessarily accurate. There are various kinds of students, but most of them are related to specific student groups, so some people think that these exams are biased. The discussion on standardization tests is broad, subtle and sometimes emotional, but many arguments are not whether the standardized tests are inherently good or not, but whether to provide test usage and reliability assessment of student learning Focus. Or bad (although this topic is definitely controversial). For example, most test developers and test experts are warning about using standardized test scores as the only measure of educational performance. In general, standardized tests are more likely to be subject to controversy and controversy in making decisions about educational policies, schools, teachers, and students using test scores.

The US Supreme Court recently decided that the Constitution guarantees the right of same-sex marriage. As of January 2014, legalizing homosexual marriages, only 17 states in the United States allowed the same-sex couples to marry. In the other 33 states, there is a constitutional amendment denying the same-sex couples' marriage freedom (domestic law). Geller said that since the beginning of the history history, homosexual relations, even homosexual marriages also existed. But in 1970, when a homosexual couple trying to get marriage permission was dismissed, the battle for equal rights began (same sex marriage). Serious logical flaw: It is periodic and deterministic. In gay marriage debates, questions are raised about the definition of marriage. Advocates of gay marriage say that in fact, the definition of marriage as a combination of male and female is wrong. It must be extended to include same sex couples. Given this challenge to the definition of marriage, this definition alone can not provide it separately. You need to attach reasons why males and females are defined as correct or best definitions. Defense will experience a fatal cycle unless the defense definition is simply the definition of the definition itself. It insists on the conclusion as a conclusion (the correct definition of marriage). This is the same as saying "I said so, so it's right." Controversy continues constantly about homosexual marriage. Liberal and conservatives have repeatedly argued that this is the best way to deal with homosexual marriages. In a strict definition, liberalists want to legalize gay marriages. On the other hand, conservatives just want to maintain marriage between men and women. But in this discussion the boundaries between these conflicting views deviate from the basic view on the problem. - According to Mueller 's freedom of speech, "... is almost as important as freedom of thinking and largely depends on the same reason" (71). And indeed, it is inseparable from freedom of thought. Muller insists that we need to think freely think freely, have the freedom to form my opinion, and open a free discussion forum to express disagreement of opinion. Questions about ethics, family relations, freedom of speech, and sexuality are in danger in homosexual marriage debates. The main assertion of gay marriage is that we should control the government to suppress marriage and other problems in private life. "Question: Homosexual marriage" is a book written by Debra Miller in 2012 and includes a broad perspective on the subject. One of the biggest problems in homosexual marriage debate is the importance of American churches being separated from the state.

How to swing the pendulum: nature - promote debate One of the most interesting scientific and cultural debates of the 20th century is the origin of behavior. Problems arising from biology and psychology are often called 'naturally raising' debates. At various points, consensus changed from one to the other as a hypothetical reason for our behavior. These changes are influenced not only by the results of internal mechanics but also by external influences (today), especially by the development of politics and other fields. The argument between nature and cultivation is about scientific, cultural and philosophical arguments about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are mainly caused by nature and cultivation. In this discussion, nature is often defined as genetic or hormone-based behavior and cultivation is most often defined as environment and experience. Discussions between nature and cultivation are in progress. Contemporary discussion is not influenced by the early environment and development, but mainly on the influence of genes on human personality. Along with changes in cultural practices, people are increasingly deepening their understanding of this argument. For example, in the 1960 's, psychologists and popular culture were generally strongly influenced by behavioral theory. This theory leads to a broad belief that human nature is mainly influenced by experience and training. In the context of nature and cultivation controversy, "nature" refers to the impact of biological / genetic susceptibility on human characteristics, and nurturing refers to the effects of learning and other environments. Discussions continue between scholars and non-experts as to whether people's strengths and weaknesses are natural or cultivated. This argument has great social significance, especially with regard to the ability to be considered for determining people's learning / intellectual abilities (Lynch, 2016). Discussions on natural development include reasons leading to the development of certain things. Discussion of nature and cultivation is historical rather than present. Today, most psychologists have different views on development: they believe that they lead to development in a biologically predisposing direction, but experience influences development performance. These two sources are considered to be interrelated and are not the opposite. They are the way of interaction, which is the subject of concern. There is much debate about the argument that fosters about the extent to which nature and cultivation have an impact on the development process - known as nature. People who support the essence of the argument assert that intelligence is congenital or congenital and that the genes of children determine their cognitive abilities. Children develop at various speeds for various reasons. However, development takes place in the same order. The upper part of the body, especially the brain and head develops rapidly, but the lower part of the body becomes slower. This is called head-to-toe development, or head-to-head development. In addition, development starts from the center. This is called inside - out or neighborhood development. Therefore, the baby can keep his head up, swing his arm before getting up, and manipulate his hands finely.

The topic of abortion is one of the most controversial topics affecting our society. The difference between support and abortion invited hundreds of battles, which further led to death. No matter how many people accept it, the removal of the fetus is wrong. This is a matter of personal evaluation. Therefore, each party can guarantee that the shift is wrong. Therefore, investigations still exist and premature birth should be legal. Although many may oppose the fact that legitimizing abortion is the only way to give women the right. This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I decided to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. Both sides raised many topics in the discussion of abortion. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as human life. Because professional life believes that life begins with a concept, abortion is like murder, it is an act of robbing human life. now The symmetry resulting from the analysis of the main arguments on both sides of the discussion on abortion can explain why it seems difficult to solve the discussion on abortion. Consider the following discussion of standard anti-pregnancy abortion: the fetus is a human being and living. Human beings have the right to life. Therefore, the fetus has the right to live. Of course, women have the right to control their bodies, but the right of life is beyond the rights of women who control their bodies. Therefore, abortion is wrong. Judith Thomson (1971) argues that this argument fails even if a person gives the right of life to the fetus (for discussion only). Thomson encourages you to imagine that you are connected when you are sleeping, that blood is in the blood, and that you are a famous violinist. Violinists with rare blood disorders will die if they break it. Thomson believes that you have the right to disconnect you.

Who the Son of God, the daughter of mankind, and the Nie Pirim are, can be learned by searching the Bible for ways to state them in other sections. This is a good way to analyze the meaning of words and sets of words using only the Bible without flaws or errors. "Regarding God, his steps are perfect, the word of the Lord is perfect, he will protect all those who avoid him." (Psalm 18:30) "All the poems are sucked by God It is useful for teaching, reproaching, correcting, training in justice "(2 Timothy 3:16) The Son of God is not just Genesis. Please say that this word is found in Job. The sons of God use more familiar words - in order to transcend the boundaries of God's fate between heaven and earth by giving birth to human beings. These children are called Nephilim. The word "Nephilim" does not mean "collapsed" but "giant". Those who want to read the academic data behind this conclusion can read the "invisible area". For our purposes, we need to focus on ancient wedge-shaped scholars - wedge shapes of clay tablets known from ancient Mesopotamia - and new evidence has recently been found with these tablets. Explain what I have presented about clear and clear similarities in Genesis 6: 1-4 and explain why this strange story is included in the flood story Opening our hearts, we can start exploring the possible roots of our species through deep teachings of ancient Egypt. Anunnaki confused his blood of the Nephilim race with the blood of the primitive man of the earth and created homosexual seeds. Adam and Eve, the first civilized men and women, can still breed, despite breeding. Eventually Nifferim started aging faster than usual because they did not touch the life potions available at Nibiru because they are too short on the earth. The older Niefriim was ready to leave the earth, but before that they left a record of civilized creation stories and instructed Adam and his descendants not to eat Niefrim's food and drink Did. There was a war between the two groups, and the war that was completely male has almost disappeared from the earth.

Gun control is a controversial topic in the United States. There are many supporters of gun control - people who want to make more rigorous laws to prevent some people from buying guns. However, some people opposed the gun control law and believed that there should be loose gun control to further aid people in defending themselves in dangerous situations. Many gun control laws have been passed over the years. Many people passed, but many people are voted to be unconstitutional, which means they will affect the rights of the second revision of the citizens. In fact, "gun control is not synonymous with the word" firearms confiscated "," banned firearms "or" registered firearms "(gun control can take any form). Whether there should be 'gun control arguments' is not about the US gun control law - because the balance of rights must carry weapons security and security, they are already done at the federal and state level I have done it. - People as a whole. In fact, gun control is not only their manufacture / sales, but also how to adjust the type of ammunition for what kind of firearms and citizens' problems, insane in the criminal and control hands I came up with a way to deal with problems such as weapons from such people. Use by yourself It may be annoying for brave men, women, and young people to discuss the second amendment to participate in the gun control debate. But it does not have to be so. There are many false alarms that encourage political discussions over gun control, but the law itself and its application are relatively easy to follow. The following explains the second amendment and how it supports state gun reform requirements. There are explanations about the worldwide task of implementing constitutional rights. Discussion on gun control The discussion on gun control has recently become very popular. People question whether guns are really needed. Others want to know that if the government provides that they have the right to have a gun crime rate, the number of deaths in the United States will decrease. Some people think that guns should not be attributed to death, "guns do not kill people, people kill people." If they are convinced of their claim, how can you conclude which claims are right? There are always two aspects of the constitution, which are excluded. The Bill of Rights was approved on December 15, 1791. (Constitution of the United States) There were major criticisms, especially in recent years, due to the revision of the Constitution. The subject of gun control is controversial and related issues are submitted to the Supreme Court. The second revised country said, "For the security of free countries, we need a well-controlled militia, the citizens have the right to hold weapons and transport them and do not violate them.

The argument over the gun was burned and the Nazis caught Jim Rogers. He is often beaten and has little food to survive. While participating in the POW camp in World War II, he was able to maintain his reasons by putting together several color fabrics to make the American flag. When his prisoner began to die, it was his American flag that gave him a sense of identity and gave him inspiration to survive. So it is not surprising that Jim will feel uneasy as he looks at the news and saw our flag burned on a foreign street. "You can imagine that there is no more appropriate countermeasure than burning the flag, rather than banning flags, even if the burning flag does not guarantee dignity, honor the burning flag Not that, as the witness does, according to his intention it will weaken the freedom represented by this valuable badge in the sense that it is a respectable worthy funeral, so punish its bondage and put the flag Do not sanctify: "Freedom and equality have constantly stimulated teachers like Bataan's leaders like Patrick Henry, Susan B. Anthony, Abraham Lincoln, Nathan Hale, Booker T. Washington. The Filipino Boy Scouts fighting and the brawl of soldiers' bluff at Omaha Beach - if these ideas are worth fighting - and our history proves that they are - The only flag symbolizing the power of is not worth protecting from unnecessary embarrassment. Discussion about the burning of the flag is not unusual. In recent 2006, attempts to revise the Constitution failed and Congress was able to ban the national flag. The reason for this amendment is that the US Supreme Court ruled that the flag was protected by the First Amendment, thereby invalidating the law that was trying to limit it. First of all, a constitutional amendment is required to allow Congress to enact such a law. The incineration of the American flag is often a source of debate, which suggested making this practice illegal through amendments. According to the US Constitution, in order to consider the revision of this flag two-thirds of the votes cast by each parliament or two-thirds of the parliament must be submitted by the Diet called by Congress. In order to become part of the Constitution, the amendment must be approved by three quarters of the State legislature or three quarters of the State Convention. The author of the Constitution can not intentionally pass the amendment for several reasonable reasons. After reading some of the current questions about whether to adopt the "revision of the flag" I am convinced that the revision of the flag is unnecessary. I am not saying that burning a flag by myself is morally right, but I think there should be several reasons why this should be allowed.

Faith and Science In today's world, there is discussion between faith and science. Extraordinary progress in science sometimes convinces people that it can answer all of its own problems and solve all his problems. Some people have reached the conclusion that God is no longer needed. Some say that either faith or science must be chosen. People seem to believe that God is the creator of life and others scientifically believe in the spontaneous life of inanimate objects (Wright 111). Finally, the debate of religion and science results in selection between a belief based world view and a rationalistic world view. There, each language and vocabulary is used to analyze and decompose the world where different poles of ideology are occupied. Coherent discussion about the problem can not be done in other languages. The most reasonable reason to say that scientists do not believe in God or sacred existence, like irony is frustrating, is that they simply choose not to do. Faith and Science In today's world, there is discussion between faith and science. Extraordinary progress in science sometimes convinces people that it can answer all of its own problems and solve all his problems. Some people have reached the conclusion that God is no longer needed. Some say that either faith or science must be chosen. People seem to believe that God is the creator of life and others scientifically believe in the spontaneous life of inanimate objects (Wright 111). Brecht's Galileo streamlined the war between faith and allegiance (rationality). It is widely believed that faith is the foundation of religion. Religion can exist only through religious institutions. In contrast, science arises from doubt and reason. Scientific disciples believe that doubt is the entrance to science and belief is a matrix of religion. Since ancient times, people have always believed that faith is the only way to the truth. This view has an absolute say in the community of religious people. In the community of Western Christian thinkers of the 17th century, this view was absolutely endorsed. Christian thinkers of the 17th century believe that the ultimate truth is faith. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, the central difference between the nature of science and religion is that scientific claims depend on experimental verification, while religious claims depend on unreliable recognition methods about it. Therefore neither is compatible with current practice and discussion on compatibility or incompatibility will last forever. Victor J. Stenger, a philosopher and a physicist, insists that science and religion are not compatible. Because conflicts between cognitive methods and plausible natural interpretations of religious choices are usually explained in a religious context.

The spirit and values ​​of the country are embodied in the hero of the country. Since 1792, Christopher Columbus has been regarded as an American hero. On the second Monday of October every year, Columbus Day will be held in commemoration of the man and his property. However, many insist on whether it is necessary to celebrate Columbus Day. I believe that Columbus Day should be celebrated in America, as Columbus Day opened up a new world in Europe and influenced the exploration and adventure spirit that still exists today. We all know the argument about Columbus Day. We begin to question that and I like to believe that it has to change. However, I have never heard that Italian-American consent to Columbus Day. I am from a very intimate family of Venice and Piedmont but I have never been taught to tie my Italian identity to this vacation. Then I received an email requesting "Save Columbus Day" from Italian heritage organization Sons Sons: "Our holidays are under attack, Columbus Day, the entire Italian-American community, and To celebrate the importance of immigration experience to build a great country. " Monday is Columbus Day, which usually means a year's debate about the heritage of Christopher Columbus. This discussion is increasingly raising questions about the traditional portraits of hero's 'discoverers' in the American continent of Columbus, but on the long-term impact of indigenous abuse and colonization in Europe. This is Columbus Day, which means the time has come to discuss every year about whether the holiday is worth the celebration. As a matter of fact, this should not be discussed at all: Columbus Day is absolutely not worth celebrating. First, Christopher Columbus is a violent and cruel man who unnecessarily supervises torture and murder of representative human - countless American Indians. He did this not for self defense but for desire for money. History is obvious, this is the only direct information on Columbus expedition. Columbus Day is an American holiday, in 1492 Christopher Columbus landed in the Americas and on October 1, the Columbus Day will be marked in October 2018. As early as the 18th century, it held an informal celebration in many cities and provinces, but it did not become a federal holiday until 1937. For many people, this holiday is to celebrate Columbus' achievement and celebrate the Italian-American tradition. But throughout the history Columbus Day and the people who stimulated it caused controversy and many people raised this issue since the 1970's, which replaced holidays.

The discussion of Lincoln Douglas in 1858 was a very influential event that occurred in the American history and was still very important today. Discussion is for the Illinois State Senate. The main topic involved in this debate was the separation of labor unions over slavery. Both Lincoln and Douglas mentioned in the remarks on the Constitution of the United States and opposed their interpretation of the meaning of certain parts of slavery. Lincoln Douglas's debate in the Illinois State Senate election in 1858: Lincoln Douglas's debate was seven consecutive times, Douglas argued against his constitution of Le Compton on his grounds and led Lincoln to the fundamental abolitionist. Lincoln condemned Douglas for not taking a moral position against slavery. Lincoln 's House Split Lecture: The "House Split" speech was a 1858 Republican speech before the State Council of Springfield, Illinois. It warns people "split housing is unacceptable" and refers to slavery issues. Lincoln predicted in the speech that slaves will eventually become free The Lincoln - Douglas debate is a series of formal political debates between the challenger Abraham Lincoln and the present President Stephen Douglas who took part in one of the two US Senators in Illinois. Although Lincoln was defeated by the elections, these discussions renamed him nationwide and ultimately led him to be elected president of the United States. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to discuss in seven out of the nine Illinois parliament areas; 7 people did not say Douglas. In each discussion, Douglas or Lincoln starts in an hour. Then another person speaks for an hour and a half. There was an objection for 30 minutes for the first time. In the 7th discussion, Douglas as incumbent was previously accepted four times The Lincoln - Douglas debate (aka the 1858 debate) was a series of seven discussions between the US Senate Illinois Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln and Democratic Senator Stephen Douglas. At that time, Lincoln and Douglas were trying to gain control of the Illinois Congress by their respective parties, as US senators were elected by the Legislature. Discussion is predicting the problems Lincoln will face after the victory of the 1860 presidential election. Illinois is a free state, but the main problem being discussed in all seven discussions is slavery in the United States.

Introduction of Bible Baptism In today's society, baptism is one of the greatest supporters who send people to hell; unfortunately, many of the taught false theories are taught by the church today and this popular Creed, baptism caused more effective than the original intention. There may be doubts about how religious people studying religion believe that the church is wrong with baptism. That is true, so I came up with this idea. The Church continues to mislead people about what is baptism, not being baptized, people fit for baptism, and how to accept baptism. The modern era continues a major debate caused by the Anabaptist movement, which has led to the division of baptismal beliefs and practices for generations. At the forefront of this discussion is the essence of baptism, consideration of baptism, and how the church should celebrate baptism. In this modern era, enormous diversity and division within the church on baptism are included, and the division has expanded since the 16th century. Today, it is common to step into many evangelical churches. The baptistery seems to be the focus of architectural design to enhance the immersion sense. Clearly, immersion is not the only thing that the church has been baptized for centuries. However, we abandon all discussions of baptismal baptism and believer's baptism. But even the communion practicing the followers of baptism is different, immersion, throwing away, sprinkling can best represent the model of the New Testament. My purpose is to show the subject of the Bible and symbolic meaning, to practice baptism through immersion. The verb baptidzo was widely used in the era of New Testament in both paganism and the Jewish world. The Jewish ancestors include three citations of the Greek Old Testament on baptismal rituals. Two kings 5:14 (Naaman), Judit 12: 7 (Judit) and Ecclesia stickus 34: 25. General reference on contact with the body. The author of the New Testament utilized these scattered bibliographies Earlier Christian faiths about baptism may precede the work of the New Testament. Sure thing is that the affirmations of many Jews and Jesus' disciples are baptized and baptism is a part of Jewish religious beliefs. Before the baptism by the name of Jesus Christ, John the Baptist baptized many people. Much of the interpretation of orthodox Christian faith that was later baptized was due to an apostle like Paul and he compared Christ and baptism in his death (Romans 6: 3-4; Colossey 2: 12). Based on this description, some modern theologians believe that early Christians practiced baptism by drowning (Matthew 3: 13-17). This interpretation is being discussed between Christian sectors advocating immersive baptism and those who are baptized through perfusion or crouching and immersion practices.

Discussion on the background of school uniforms In some countries, such as the UK and Caribbean countries, at the end of compulsory education, especially for 16 years, school students need to wear special uniforms identified in specific institutions. In France and the United States, we rarely wear uniforms, but some private schools are wearing uniforms. In both cases, the applicability of school uniforms is controversial among students, parents and educators. Article: Discussion about uniforms is still available, but school uniform announcement increases student's academic severity, creating a more coherent and friendly student's atmosphere Any uniform Prejudice and social group. It is no doubt that clothing and therefore all schools in the United States should approve uniforms. Introduction is the most difficult and important part of this paper. Yes, you have saved the most important and effective details in the body of the article. First pass through the body Discussion on the background of school uniforms In some countries, such as the UK and Caribbean countries, at the end of compulsory education, especially for 16 years, school students need to wear special uniforms identified in specific institutions. In France and the United States, we rarely wear uniforms, but some private schools are wearing uniforms. In both cases, the tolerance of uniforms remains controversial ... the discussion on uniform policy is to maintain a little bit of safety with the public; is freedom abandoned? Uniforms have existed for centuries, but the public schools in the United States were recently introduced in 1979 as a way to counter the differences in the social status of students. Today, school uniform policy is seen as a way to fight violence in the school system in the United States. Collin's English Dictionary online defines a uniform as a prescribed identification card

Please introduce discussion of abortion and list the main problems related to abortion Discussion of abortion involves the right to intentionally end pregnancy before normal birth and kill the fetus in the process Abortion is a very painful topic for women and men who feel confronted with an ethical dilemma to end pregnancy. This is one of the most extreme ethical issues - most people are on one or the other, and few are pending Even if you conclude that abortion is morally wrong, it does not mean that abortion is correct, you need to ask if pregnancy abortion is the best (or worst) in each particular situation . If we conclude that abortion is morally wrong it does not mean that abortion is not always allowed; we need to ask if abortion is wrong over other options. On the other hand, those who call themselves "pro-life". They say that intentional abortion is always wrong (although it may be the best thing in rare cases). On the other hand, we refer to ourselves as "support to support" or "supporters of abortion rights", and in some cases intentional abortion is considered acceptable. Because there is no way to get advice from the fetus on this issue (as in the case of euthanasia consideration) and because the fetus is easily portrayed as completely innocent and helpless, people feel that they are particularly strong about abortion I will. Existence If the fetus has the right to life, will this right take precedence over the right to control the mother's body? These questions can be repeated based on pregnant women and the decisions that their doctor must face. Other rights are more important than the right to life. For example, do women have the right to decide how to deal with their bodies? If the lady's life is at risk from pregnancy, how will you decide who's right to prioritize? If we adhere to this argument and admit that the fetus has the right to live, we will face the second part of the problem. Abortion is incorrect unless it fulfills the mother's specific rights. It is morally important in the right of fetal life. Thus, abortion is wrong unless the mother provides higher rights than managing her rights. Abortion summary abortion is a common point in diverse and influential discussions in various societies, especially the United States. One of the most controversial topics is whether abortion is ethical. More than 40% of women stop pregnancy by abortion at some stage of reproductive life (Stacey OL) Abortion (Professional Life) Sports Profile Abortion is one of the most controversial and most anxious topics in our era. It is a classroom, at work, and even on the internet. Pregnancy abortion is defined as the end of pregnancy, immediately after death or death of the fetus or fetus. This definition includes accidental abortions such as abortion and stillbirth. But this is not the content of the discussion. I would like to know whether abortion is ethical ... the topic of abortion is one of the most controversial topics in our time. It caused countless deaths and several intense conflicts between two independent opinion groups. Struggle among supporters who support life and choose options is long and brutal. Some people may believe that abortion is not a good thing or a good thing, but this is the case. This is a matter of personal opinion and it varies from person to person. In this way, each party can definitely say the other party This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I chose to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. There were many topics in the discussion of abortion between the two sides. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as a human life. Because professional life thinks that life starts with a concept, abortion is like killing, it is an act of robbing human life. now Legislation of abortion

In 1996 Bill Clinton said about his uniform in 1996. . There are many opinions about uniform theme, but we should also listen to their opinions. What I would like to present to you includes the opinion of the three parties. Uniforms, supporters, and people who oppose myself. School uniforms are essential for the safety of schools in the 21st century - this must be remembered in any school uniform discussion. School uniforms allow teachers and staff to quickly differentiate between students and strangers. Today, schools must be particularly vigilant for people who want to break into campus to use predators or disadvantaged students. School uniforms are easy to distinguish when there are strange, discreet and unfamiliar strangers on campus. It is easy to detect in time, and the staff takes appropriate action to protect children. In addition, uniforms can help teachers track students' short trips and allow them to discover their students even among many people. Whether the school should seek uniforms has been discussed for a long time. Uniforms are very helpful for both school and students. Uniforms make students more familiar and reduce the tendency to be based on distractions or bullying. Discussion about public school uniforms is much more problematic than children should wear to school. It includes problems such as general improvement of school and performance, freedom of speech, and "cultural war". But School uniforms were always a controversial issue in the United States. For centuries, many researchers insisted on whether or not to wear school uniforms. In the United States, most public schools do not require students to wear uniforms. But at private schools students must wear uniforms. In most countries, school uniforms are required in both public and private schools. They have even summer and winter uniforms according to the weather. Most people

The introduction of the death penalty is a positive punishment. In a sense, a person convicted has never committed another crime, that is, a murder. As opposed to it, as a human being, we support the assertion that we should not be responsible for judging who should die or should not. This argument is supported for moral reasons, whether religious or moral. Another argument against it is that the criminals facing the death penalty did not prevent them from continuing the murder. In the 19th century debate on the death penalty, the religious debate of competition filled with the broad interpretation of various Bible texts is very common. Christian warnings are said to have been made for individuals, not countries. If individuals must comply with Christian rules, society will be affected equally as well. Discussion about the death penalty is shaken among strengths and weaknesses, but the main problem is usually based on practicality: is the execution of criminals the best way to protect society? Is the death penalty fair? Is the death penalty effective for suppressing crime? Many of today's killers are professional criminals whose victims were killed by hijacking, robbery, or other profit-oriented crime. Therefore, many murderers do not kill people for revenge, and they are not malignant for individuals they kill them. Instead, they killed the calculation of cold blood. Protecting your society should make it impossible for these people to kill again. Mass-public debate over whether to resume capital punishment is intensifying. Proponents arguing this argued that this is an effective deterrent against homicide. However, most studies in Western society conclude that the rate of murder remains steady or decreasing while reducing the use of the death penalty. Abolition and reintroduction of the death penalty did not have a significant effect on the murder rate. In the poll conducted in 2013, 63% of Canadians support the recovery of torture and 30% oppose it. Manitoba and Saskatchewan have the highest support rate (75%), Quebec's lowest approval rating (36% of respondents oppose recovery)

The death penalty is one of the most discussed issues in the United States. This is a prisoner ordered to execute the death penalty. There are many people opposed to the death penalty, others support the death penalty. People who oppose it think that it is inhumane or too expensive. The death penalty believes this will give individuals the opportunity to be charged with his misconduct. Billions of dollars each year are used for criminal death sentences. The death penalty debate about the death penalty has caused extensive controversy. Please do not select this topic as there is debate. However, the death penalty is a problem that needs to be resolved. Should the death penalty be abolished from our criminal justice system? Well, that depends on who you ask. If you ask me ... No. I personally do not see any problems in the death penalty because there are socially risky criminals and death is the only criminal. ... The author of the book, James Fernner, said "Mentally retarded are not in the death penalty". "If a person's intelligence level is significantly below the average, he is usually considered a mentally retarded person, as it usually records IQ below 70 points and there is no adaptive behavior under 18 years of age The Association, it has three elements: 1. It is significantly lower than the average intellectual function. 2. Associated damage A detailed explanation of the recent death penalty in Illinois, including John J. Kinsella's "Chicago Tribune", the so-called "13 Disclaimers", Rolando Cruz and the prosecutor's discussion. The first state prosecutor in DuPage County. According to opinion polls, Europeans and Canadians are almost as supportive of the death penalty as the Americans, the death penalty: prudent response to malicious acts, investigation by the Ministry of Justice in filing a federal executions to the racial or ethnic prejudice Did not the death penalty save the innocent life? The death penalty of racist God, the death sentence opponents apply erroneous logic, Lieberman's death sentence "investigation" is inaccurate and when a murderer is executed, a nun says the church's bell I'm trying to ring. As usual, innocent victims have no bell In 2011 Illinois abolished the death penalty. As the Illinois state criminal justice system was afraid to impose death penalty on innocent people, when George Ryan gave a death sentence to each prisoner's judgment, a controversial discussion on the abolition of the death penalty in 2000 Began. The death penalty is controversial and often controversial. This discussion focuses on important issues such as: Does the state have legal and moral rights to execute citizens? How do you avoid avoiding being an innocent person? Because the death penalty can not be restored, it is important that there is no error in executions of convicted people.

One of the biggest social conflicts at the moment is the parents' pressure on whether children should participate in daycare. Many parents are struggling with this decision, but others have no choice and many questions have been asked about whether infants and toddlers are beneficial or harmful to go to daycare. Of course, there are many opinions and research on this subject. However, day care has been discussed between parents, health care providers and educational experts. Some people support day care, saying that children are not at home with parents and relatives provides social and educational opportunities. Others argue that people who use day care services allow other people to raise their children and abandon their responsibilities as parents. As with the controversial issue, there are discussions between the two sides. Here are pros and cons for sending your child to a nursery Choosing day care for your child is one of the most important decisions for most new parents. You can choose family day care or community day care. In family day care, children will receive more personal care, fewer children, and they are better suited to the personal needs of their parents. At home nursery school children receive more personal care. The nanny can make the children play and educate with a more personalized level of learning. In regional daycare, children are taught as a group. In this case, some children will be late as they did not learn at the same speed. In addition, in family daycare, children can be taken to parks, zoos, or elsewhere they can learn. In Community Day Care, they are strictly limited to daycare I will explain the importance of Arcoiris Day Care for communities and how this service can help people who can not take care of a child. Arcoiris Daycare opened on 19th June 2009. This family's daycare is available for children of all ages, including babies, toddlers and kindergartens. Arcoiris Day Care is open from 8 am to 5 pm Monday to Friday and 9 am to 3 pm on Saturdays. In addition, this family day care is in collaboration with the government of Care 4 Kids, Care 4 Kids

Among the 34 countries in the world, America is one of the shortest grade. The American traditional grade is 180 days. Korean children spent 220 days in class and Finland spends 190 days at school. Both educational systems are ranked higher in mathematics and science fields than in the United States. Over the past decade, there was a lot of discussion on whether school-age school children in America are attending school. Some educators and board of education want to introduce school system throughout the year. It was accepted and dismissed. One of the core problems of these arguments is to define school education throughout the year. The term grade may refer to two particular types of grade. One of the definitions proposed by educators is to increase the actual number of days from 180 days to more. The more general usage of the term grade does not mean substantial growth in the grade of the United States. It actually means redistribution of students for a year. In the 180-year grade for the whole year, students work on a more fair system of holidays and holidays. There is a short break between semester and semester. Some schools prefer vacation plans for 45th and 15th, others have schools to choose other schools. This includes 60 day open, 20 day closing, 90 day course, and 30 day course. Some people discuss some form of school system throughout the year. Supporters who are increasing in real-time will see it as a means of keeping pace with other countries of the world. The lack of mathematics and science skills is considered harmful and is a result of too little learning time compared to many places in the world. Actual increase in total class hours is considered as a means to reduce the time students retrain when they forget during summer vacation or long vacation. In the general discussion to support change system, the concept of traditional American full-year school is as follows. Family arrangements can be made shorter, at a more affordable price, and even a feasible vacation time. There are some arguments against any alteration of the basic 180 day grade in whatever form. Some people think that children need to take a day off to become "a simple child". But essentially, the discussion on school education throughout the year is as follows: It does not matter whether children are taking a few days or many vacations. I need to reconsider the materials I forgot When the grade changes, there is a possibility that there is not enough number of specific after school plans. People who do so may not match the years of performance or competition Families receiving two different forms of school education throughout the year may be difficult to adjust. Regardless of whether the annual system is as effective as the previous academic year, there is no definitive data. Academic data is scattered too much. The efficiency of this topic is also different. If an actual full-year system with an increase in the number of days spent in the classroom is implemented, it is necessary to track it within a few years to determine if similar uncertain outcomes will occur. The question of whether education can improve the student's academic ability throughout the year is an important issue in the educational debate throughout the year. School supporters throughout the year insist that students receive educational benefits. However, there is a large amount of research showing that there is no big difference in the achievement of education between school students and students of traditional calendar schools throughout the year (Zykowski, 1991, Harp, 1993). Another proposition (Ballinger et al., 1987) took valuable time for students to forget the previous study and to review the course at the beginning of the new grade, so the long summer vacation of the traditional school calendar is harmful I assert that. As an alternative to traditional calendars, it is often said that year-round courses shorten review time, as stu

American schools are faced with greater pressure to serve American children than ever before. In addition to trying to create a learning curve to illuminate the future of our country without leaving our children ("Do not drop the child behind the bill"), the new pressure on nutrition is suspected of the US citizen It was added to the long-lasting impossible task list without the school has to be completed. There are several ways to change the lunch offered by the school, but changing the minds of parents who pack a child's lunch may be a completely new and tough task. It is a good choice for your children to have lunch if it is impossible to pack lunch with no packaged food. According to research on lunch packs and school lunches, "It is unlikely that lunch packs will contain fruit (54% versus 67%) and vegetables (17% vs. 61%)." And biscuits (57% versus 5%) and sweet drinks (40% vs. 0%) 1. It is much easier to give children what they want to eat. You may avoid unnecessary avoid avoidance and prevent your child from wasting money due to food. Why do not children want fresh fruits and vegetables? Why do kids think they can choose junk food at lunch time? Our adults let the children touch colorful confectionery foods, fast food and everything in between My idea is to pack brown paper bags for lunch. I can have lunch like my mother. Simple and healthy lunch including sandwiches, fruits, biscuits and other desserts. When they ask me if I can give them something to eat, I will not buy fast food for people, but I will give them bagged lunches. In this way I can cultivate more people. Because I do not work at the moment, I have time, so I can see that I am hungry somewhere. I do not know why these people are hungry. I just know that it is wrong to make people feel hungry when I have enough food. People I see on the street every day may be mentally ill. Perhaps they were alcoholics and drug addicts throughout their lifetime ... probably they are undergoing psychosis or abuse when they are young and the only way to alleviate them is self treatment. In my crisis with the police, I saw a lot of these things. Packed lunch now. In the face of a serious fact it is not that "the country is better than its parents". My parents currently spend nearly 1 billion pounds on lunch, but only 1% meets nutritional standards. It is painful for most schools to separate kids with hot food from children of lunch packs. For details, please read the school food program. I am pleased to know that as a taxpayer, we will make full use of our educational system by offering free warm lunch to more children. School is where children learn. I hope that this new regulation will help children enjoy fun as soon as possible and try new foods to enjoy with friends and promote long-term health. This is a good investment

The debate about the death penalty has been going on for countless years. The death penalty has been used for thousands of years due to the physical fear of those who witnessed and understood the death penalty. The use of such punishment reduces crime, helps to change the minds of future criminals, and prevents committing a violent crime such as murder, rebellion, spy, terrorism, and in some cases even worsening kidnapping . Supporters claim that it can stop crime, but the abolitionists say it is unconstitutional. In the 19th century debate on the death penalty, the religious debate of competition filled with the broad interpretation of various Bible texts is very common. Christian warnings are said to have been made for individuals, not countries. If individuals must comply with Christian rules, society will be affected equally as well. Discussion about the death penalty is shaken among strengths and weaknesses, but the main problem is usually based on practicality: is the execution of criminals the best way to protect society? Is the death penalty fair? Is the death penalty effective for suppressing crime? Many of today's killers are professional criminals whose victims were killed by hijacking, robbery, or other profit-oriented crime. Therefore, many murderers do not kill people for revenge, and they are not malignant for individuals they kill them. Instead, they killed the calculation of cold blood. Protecting your society should make it impossible for these people to kill again. Mass-public debate over whether to resume capital punishment is intensifying. Proponents arguing this argued that this is an effective deterrent against homicide. However, most studies in Western society conclude that the rate of murder is steady or decreasing as well as reducing the use of the death penalty. Abolition and reintroduction of the death penalty did not have a significant effect on the murder rate. In the poll conducted in 2013, 63% of Canadians support the recovery of torture and 30% oppose it. Manitoba and Saskatchewan have the highest support rate (75%), Quebec's lowest approval rating (36% of respondents oppose recovery)

Another presidential debate for another 4 years. Before discussing the current discussion, let's talk about past arguments. The discussion between Lincoln and Douglas was important as it began Lincoln 's presidential job. Discussion will continue from August 21 to October 15. It's 7, 2 to 2 weeks. Each discussion lasted 3 hours; the first candidate spoke one hour; the second one and half hour; the first response was 30 minutes. The candidate will be replaced first. It is mainly related to the theme of slavery and alliance. Other important arguments are '48 and '57. They were the only arguments before 1960; there was no presidential argument between 1960 and 1976. See more "This is a highly educated school, one of the best schools in Houston." "This is my view of public education in the whole country" (Bud governor) President Bush also made a "start" as a reading plan I would like to change. And he wants the people to read the money. President Bush hopes to learn more about children and to receive more education for children's teachers. Bush care only children. On the other hand, Goa only agrees with the few things Bush said. He strongly supports accountability and also supports regional control. Both Bush and Goa have agreed on these two points. Goa believes that all teachers, including teaching subjects, should take tests. He also believes that 100,000 new teachers should be hired to reduce class size. The main reason is because a man sent a letter to my daughter. The girl was the 36 th student in the class; the picture shows that there is no space for the table, so she must stand up. He also hopes to reduce college taxes (up to $ 10,000 per year). I believe that both candidates have a very good educational outlook. I like college tax exemption, I also like more than 100,000 teachers to reduce class size. The presidential debate committee should admire the presidential election campaign which agreed to three discussions (plus vice president's debate). But they can do more. Clearly I am more interested in discussion. It is beneficial to provide more direct contacts with candidates who vote for voters. More discussion will enable a wider discussion of the problem. If programming is correct, other discussions may attract the interests of the voters, otherwise they are excluded from the discussion. The Presidential Discussion was originally held in 1976, 1980 and 1984 by the Female Voter Alliance, but the Presidential Discussion Committee (CPD) was founded in 1987 by the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. The main purpose of the presidential debate is to provide sponsorship and debate to the presidents and vice presidential candidates of the United States and conduct research and educational activities related to that discussion. This organization is a non-profit, non-partisan company that backed up all the presidential debate in 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004. Discussion of the US presidential election in 2016 is a series of discussions of the 2016 US presidential election. The Presidential Discussion Committee (CPD) was a bipartisan organization established in 1987 and organized three discussions among major presidential candidates. The first presidential debate in the 2016 general election took place on September 26, 2016 and is attracting the most attention in America's history with 84 million viewers. The only vice presidential debate was held in October at the second presidential debate on October 9th and the last debate was held on October 19th. All CPD discussions were held around 9 pm. 10:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time (6 PM to 7:30 PM PST)

We all know that smoking has a serious danger to our health. You can judge whether to smoke based on sufficient information, but please do accept smoking when it comes to late cancer or heart disease or other adverse effects later. But what about exposure to second-hand smoke? At this point, we do not always have the option of contacting other people's smoke. The Surgeon's Office (OGS) records high-level secondhand smoke exposure in non-smoking adults and children in the United States. We have heard that passive smoking has been exposed for many years, but legalization of marijuana in some states raises concerns about smoking in secondhand smoke. These concerns come from two perspectives. One is a health problem. Is secondhand smoke exposure of cannabis adversely affecting the health of exposed non-users? Furthermore, for those who smoke smokers who do not smoke marijuana, does this exposure affect drug testing? Is the marijuana cigarette being used dangerous or is second-smoke smoke disturbing your drug test? All these are important issues Secondhand smoke is a mixture of smoke from the burning of tobacco products (tobacco, cigars, pipes etc.) and smoke exhaled by smokers. Secondhand smoking is also known as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Exposure to secondhand smoke may be referred to as involuntary or passive smoking. Passive smoking, classified as Group A carcinogens by EPA, contains over 7,000 substances. Secondhand smoke exposure usually occurs indoors, especially in homes and cars. Secondhand smoke may move between the room and the apartment. Secondhand smoking is not prevented even if you open the window or increase the ventilation in the car or in the house. Secondhand smoke is a combination of burning smoke from cigarettes and smoke exhaling by smokers. There are two types of sidestream smoke; sidestream smoke comes directly from burning tobacco products, and mainstream smoke is smoke smoked by smokers. Because it does not have a filter to pass through, smoke burning from the edge of cigarettes and cigars actually contains more harmful substances than smoke smoked by smokers. If you are a non smoker, but your body is exposed to secondhand smoke, your body still absorbs nicotine and other harmful substances. Smoke contains more than 4000 compounds, 250 of which are toxic and more than 50 are known carcinogens. These dangerous substances will remain in the air for about 4 hours, and inhaling these particles will injure you in just a few minutes.

Discussion on the effectiveness of the juvenile criminal bill continues from the day of its establishment. Whether YOA should remain in its present form as part of the Canadian legal system. Checking the reason for their invalidity, the necessity of change, and suggested corrections and replacements will provide an accurate picture of the situation to draw conclusions. The young criminals who act in their present form are almost the best. But there are good reasons to fix it and you should carefully consider that modification. According to the Juvenile Offenses Act (1908), Juvenile Offenses Act (1984) and Juvenile Criminal Justice Act (2003) in the past century, Canada is increasingly aware of the need to treat young offenders. The method is different from that of adults. Recognizing the special needs of young people, each of these acts is designed to reduce the focus on punishing juvenile offenders and focus on further rehabilitation. In addition, in the Juvenile Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), juvenile offenders are considered suspects of special categories and very stringent rules apply to the arrest, interrogation or interrogation process of young offenders. For example, if a teenager is investigated or a criminal action is filed, YCJA obliges parents or guardians to notify and join. Similarly, all young people must explain the rights of their charters in a language appropriate for their age and level of understanding. Since the law was enacted in 2003, more young people charged with criminal offenses have benefited from this assignment. This is the custom of the former Juvenile Offender Act. Transfer is a broad range of non-criminal sanctions including community service, and if youth successfully completes, the theme fee will be charged. Article 39 paragraph 1 of the law stipulates that young offenders should not be sentenced to imprisonment unless certain mandatory conditions described in this section are fulfilled. The purpose of this section is to provide concrete guidance to the judges who are considering imprisonment. Its main purpose is to reduce Canadian "excessive dependence on non-violent youth imprisonment".

In the United States, the use of the death penalty is still a controversial issue. In each election year, politicians want to appeal to the moral feelings of voters. Voters are often the most difficult to extend the death penalty to those who are convicted of first-class murder. Both supporters and opponents of the death penalty presented persuasive discussions to support their argument. Their argument is often a different interpretation of morality in a fair society. The death penalty debate about the death penalty caused extensive controversy. Please do not select this topic as there is debate. However, the death penalty is a problem that needs to be resolved. Should the death penalty be abolished from our criminal justice system? Well, that depends on who you ask. If you ask me ... No. I personally do not see any problems in the death penalty because there are socially risky criminals and death is the only criminal. ... The author of the book, James Fernner, said "Mentally retarded are not in the death penalty". "If a person's intelligence level is significantly below the average, he is usually considered a mentally retarded person, as it usually records IQ below 70 points and there is no adaptive behavior under 18 years of age The Association, it has three elements: 1. It is significantly lower than the average intellectual function. 2. Associated damage A detailed explanation of the recent death penalty in Illinois, including John J. Kinsella's "Chicago Tribune", the so-called "13 Disclaimers", Rolando Cruz and the prosecutor's discussion. The first state prosecutor in DuPage County. According to opinion polls, Europeans and Canadians are almost as supportive of the death penalty as the Americans, the death penalty: prudent response to malicious acts, investigation by the Ministry of Justice in filing a federal executions to the racial or ethnic prejudice Did not the death penalty save the innocent life? The death penalty of racist God, the death sentence opponents apply erroneous logic, Lieberman's death sentence "investigation" is inaccurate and when a murderer is executed, a nun says the church's bell I want to ring. As usual, innocent victims have no bell

Discussion on condom dispatch In the past ten years, the theme of distributing condom in public schools has caused intense debate across the country. Supporters of distribution said free condom distribution would guarantee youth practicing safe sex and that sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy rates would be reduced. Distribution opponents noted that the distribution of free condoms would promote sexual intercourse and promote an acceptable view of sex before marriage. This sentence explains why condom distribution should be provided at school. The topic of condom distribution has caused intense debate across the country. People in favor of ration will ensure that young people practice safe sex and that sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy rates will decline. Opponents say that high school condoms are like encouraging sexual intercourse among young people and the art before martial arts is acceptable. So, considering all these factors, do you need a condom distribution plan? Discussion on condom dispatch In the past ten years, the theme of distributing condom in public schools has caused intense debate across the country. Supporters of distribution said free condom distribution would guarantee youth practicing safe sex and that sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy rates would be reduced. - How many girls are pregnant at school? Have you ever thought that they did not have "sexual conversation" with their parents or have not received some form of sex education at school? "The United States continues to be the country with the highest pregnancy rate in teenagers in all developed countries, about 40% of American women are pregnant by the age of 20. The topic of distributing condom in high school has caused a lot of controversy over the past decade. Those who support condoms distribution say that safe sex for adolescent young people will be guaranteed by distributing them, saying that the pregnancy rate of teens will drop sharply. People who oppose the distribution of condoms say that giving up condoms will promote early sexual intercourse and promote pre-marital sex is a good thing. - ... If there is no such relationship between parents and adolescents, it is more difficult for adolescents to reach adults, given that there is a possibility that young people may become sexually active. If this connection is established, then in your first sex education class, if you decide to love and become careless, teenagers are cold about what sex or what might happen You will not be afraid of the facts.

President Obama is currently confronted with one of the biggest problems in his medical planning; this is due to his commitment, his commitment to American people, and his personal approval of Americans It is a drop. Mr. Obama's many medical problems in medical care are facing some of the most difficult problems. The statement "You can keep it if you like your health care plan" is not as persistent as President Obama promised. Even President Bill Clinton said, "Even if the law changes, the President fully believes in the federal government's commitment to these people and personally believes that they should keep what they got There is. Tennessee: "Uncertainty - For ongoing discussions on Obama's medical reform to abolish and replace the laws and decisions of White House and HHS officials - to shrink the advanced requirements process and lead to higher requirements Shopper's self-paying expenses are divided in Washington, DC, there is no long-term commitment to pay corporate social responsibility to insurance companies, decision making takes place monthly "Requirements" In a long debate over Mr. Obama's medical system reform over the years, Republican leaders say to us that people, businesses, and markets hate uncertainty. This is the theme that the cards corresponded throughout the campaign and his repetitive message - the former president's shameless leader (cards now call it "O" and he himself "T") Certainly certainly, it will indeed blunt business and hurt our economy. In order to solve this problem, "T" promised "big surprise" on Wednesday's medical bill, people, enterprises and markets are very satisfied with this. In controversial debates about Mr. Obama 's medical system reform, Americans often forget that our health care system is at its lowest point in most developed countries - at least with regards to using money and profit. Can you learn from other cultures about health? Here are seven tips for not requiring a passport. 1. Practice Taoism in China. Taoism - beginning in ancient China - teaches that misfortune, joy, and denial are positive. Today, the principle of "cognitive refactoring" of Taoism forms part of cognitive therapy for depression, anxiety, stress, trauma, chronic pain. Take a deep breath during the day and quietly look back on your life.

Four corners discuss my decision criteria. - Effective response from modern society. - What did people deal with - the problem has been solved. - Today there was a problem with these historical problems. I agree that the modern society has done enough to cope with the legacy of historical globalization. Throughout history there are many controversial issues. I think that modern society did a good job in dealing with these tragedies. We have seen responses from governments and citizens themselves from all sectors of society. This article raises many questions about "American identity" and offers numerous opportunities for discussion and discussion. (Note: There are four signs in the four corners of the room: "very agree", "agree", "opposite", "opposite", "very contrary." Ask volunteers to read each citation or related text below Please access the logo representing your opinion on the statement. After you sign, please discuss your shared opinion with the people of your group. Promote team members to defend your group's opinion to the class and encourage enthusiastic but respectable arguments. Correct or incorrect I will divide the students into four groups. We designate dialog topics to discuss in every corner of the classroom. For example, the corner of the teacher's desk is "movie". The opposite corner is "gourmet". The last theme of the classroom is "sports" and "hobby". Of course you can change the theme based on your preferences and interests. four corners. Most US courts are reluctant to interfere with private group negotiations. Therefore, in most jurisdictions the "four corners" rule applies, and if the terms of the contract are clear (that is, it can reasonably be described in one direction only), the court usually does not exceed the "corners" of the agreement There is none. Testimony concerning preliminary consultation between parties) In general, the court shall notify the situation only if such external evidence is necessary to explain the ambiguous contract terms, or if it is subject to multiple rational interpretations Look at the testimony about the problem other than the explicit condition of the contract. Located in the southwestern corner of Colorado State, the northwestern corner of New Mexico State, the northeastern corner of Arizona State, and the southeastern corner of Utah State, located in the four corners of the southwest United States. Four flags meet at the corner that the flag surrounds the monument - this is the valley of a famous and beautiful monument.

Racism also exists in human babies. These babies are not taught social norms. Either way, they self help others like the job of helping to open the door. This proves that empirical theory is wrong, as babies do not learn how to experience selfishness. Finally, scientists working on twins also discovered that their results are genetically altruistic, not learning. Uniform twins share 100% of genes, and brothers twins share 50% of genes. For decades scientists and biologists have discussed arguments between nature and cultivation. This discussion is about how much our environment and genetics influence our behavior and developmental stages. According to this argument, nature can explain that human behavior occurs due to its genetic makeup. Because human behavior is due to its genetic structure, it should also affect the lifelong development and development of (natural) people. However, fostering discussion says that the cause of personal behavior is an environmental factor. Discussions between nature and nature and cultivation of cultivation are related to the relative importance of individual's innate traits and personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral characteristics. (Ridley, Matt. "The reason why you became you" Times magazine. May 25, 2003). Most people in all relevant fields have an opinion on which is more important, more natural, or more cultivated. Thomas Bouchard, Director of Twins Research Group in Minnesota, believes in the following. Nature - Do you cultivate our natural, natural trends, or products of reflections of experience and growth? This is a discussion of the famous "nature and cultivation". For decades psychologists have discussed how much genetics or genes and the environment or experience will have on thinking and behavior. Lifelong mind, way of body-to-heart contact Many psychologists think that what we experience (thinking and feelings, etc.) and our biological processes (thinking and emotions etc.) and our biological I am fascinated by the relationship with the relationship between processes (nervous system activity, etc.). . How do you explain five sustainable issues that attract psychologists from various fields of psychology?

Since the establishment of this country, we have worked as an immigrant country to solve the problem of who should be citizens and who should not be citizens. There is no doubt that illegal immigrants have a major influence on our country Now it is one of the major arguments facing our country and it is biased towards our society at many levels I did. This article explains the discussion about "Development, remedy and education law for foreign minors" (Dream 2011, 2011), which is a solution to innocent victims of illegal migrants It is a proposal that is claimed. "Dream" has been debated for 10 years. And opponents opposed to this bill in 10 years thought that 'dream bill' will reward father's illegal acts. Of course, there is abnormal logic in this discussion. To exempt a child from the dirt of the crime that the child has not committed is to bring benefits to those who did it. Therefore, refusing to bring justice to innocent children is a way to receive punishment from guilty parents through agents. After all, when the children reach a majority age they do not have documents - so the discussion will come true - they should definitely complete the novel as if they had committed crimes deliberately and define them legally In December 2010, I witnessed Congressional debate on whether to pass the federal dream law. Some members use ignorant arguments that they are indifferent to immigrant young people and their families. After all, "Law of dreams" was not established. Then I noticed that my life and the lives of thousands of people had gambled by politicians for their own interests. How can you explain a lot of disgusting speech to the group of young people you are seeking education? However, I realized the big influence we can. If it is not for publicity, the officials we chose will not have enough concern or even submit them to the poll, and the president will not create a child arrival extension (DACA) I guess. In 2012, everything including hunger strikes, rallies, sit down, protests, phone calls, sending letters, walking to Washington, DC, etc were all rewarded. First, let's analyze the difference between DREAM Act and DACA. "Dream" was the law of a bipartisan parliament, first introduced in 2001 to establish an eternal legal settlement for those who came here before the age of 16. Although this law has never passed Congress, it has been reintroduced almost every year (see the current version here). In 2012, President Barack Obama signed an enforcement order to establish the DACA program (Children's immigration deferral measures). This plan (in fact) does not allow access to the permanent road, so it is a sharp reduction of the DREAM law. Maybe you have heard of a DCA applicant called "Dreamers", but its name comes from the DREAM Act. This is an imitation of DACA.

Gender refers to psychological, social and cultural differences between men and women. Gender also means physical and anatomical differences between male and female bodies. Most social biologists believe that gender difference is a result of differences in thinking and behavior between men and women. They believe that gender identity is formed through socialization. Gender builds every aspect of private life through various forms of interaction with society, including social relations and work. Why is there so few women in the history of design? Why is it that women who were well-known so far have been forgotten and can be regarded as successful? Is there a difference in the way women make men? The impact of gender debate is revealed in today's daily work. And today's women are judged based only on the quality of work. This book gives superficial hints: Contemporary design historians, procedural writings, comprehensive biographical contributions, and Irma Boom, Paula Scher, Sheila Levrant de Bretteville, Julia Hoffmann, Tina Interview with a female designer Ross Eisenberg. Buy this book For convenience, this discussion was a series of articles titled "Sex and Capitalism: Cinzia Arruzza's Gender Explanation" collected by Viewpoint magazine in 2014. In Arruzza's article on the relationship between the theoretical patriarchal and capitalism, the feminist scholars Johanna Oksala, Sara R. Farris and FTC Manning criticized the original work of Arruza and Arruza's response to her critics was completed Did. collected. Volume 5 of "Maxim's philosophy series basics", "Maxim Walden's debate on gender and gender" Volume 5 is an easy and detailed introduction to modern feminist gender and gender thinking. This book focuses on clear and easy-to-understand sentence styles focusing on four historical arguments: the relationship between the possible differences between gender (based on biology) and gender (based on culture); Duality of sex and gender (male -) female personality; gender and performance as a concept of performance; and intersection of features of sex and race, class and other identity. Warnke considers gender and gender to be a way to understand who they are, not to define us like other functions.

Do not wear helmets do not spend money on the government to use helmets in the event of a collision, so do not wear helmets There is no difference between injuries from helmets and helmets, helmets limit individual freedom. I live in Wisconsin, we see many motorcycle drivers without a helmet, I think many non motorcycle drivers are irresponsible, or he will spend more money there instead of genuine The motorcyclist has health insurance. Discussion on whether or not to wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle has been a hot topic since the Helmet Act was enforced in California in 1992. Wearing a helmet clearly helps to protect you from motorcycle accidents. Many Councils agree. In fact, in 19 states there is a mandatory helmet law for all motorcycle riders. There are 27 provinces offering additional insurance for people who have legislation for people of defined age, three of whom have chosen not to wear helmets. Only four states remain without a helmet. Despite these facts, the helmet is still a surface security measure at a realistic speed. However, since this is a matter of public policy, legal process is complicated, including not only health problems but freedom of action. Many motorcycle riders enjoy long-distance off-road trips. Law Tigers recognizes that it is difficult to keep up with the law revision of helmets for motorcycles in various fields. While some states require all riders to wear safety helmets, other states require wearing safety helmets only for riders under 18 years old. On the other hand, there are several provinces that do not require a helmet. Please spend some time getting used to the motorcycle helmet method nationwide. In most states, the biker and its passengers need to wear a helmet. Some states, such as Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Indiana, New Mexico, Utah, and Maine require passengers and passengers under 18 years of age to wear a helmet. Wearing a helmet is optional for riders who exceed the legal age.

"School uniform: Yes or no" The concept of school uniforms is a topic that has been discussed for many years. Some students need uniforms, others do not like colors. I think the student who thinks that uniform is not necessary is wrong. Uniform is a good idea to help students take self discipline, have an equal environment, and to enjoy more scholars. Uniforms are a good way to maintain the level of social equality. The positive influence of wearing uniforms will be greater than the negative impact. School uniforms are essential for the safety of schools in the 21st century - this must be remembered in any school uniform discussion. School uniforms allow teachers and staff to quickly differentiate between students and strangers. Today, schools must be particularly vigilant for people who want to break into campus to use predators or disadvantaged students. School uniforms are easier to distinguish if there are strange, understated, unfamiliar strangers on campus. It is easy to detect in time, and the staff takes appropriate action to protect children. In addition, uniforms can help teachers track students' short trips and allow them to discover their students even among many people. The discussion about uniforms at school today is not completely furious, but there is still data on collecting and checking, and the effects of trousers and suit jackets on schoolchildren. According to a new study by researchers at the University of Houston, the school uniform seems to work well to improve student attendance and teacher retention, but the substantial impact on student performance improvement There is none. For their data, researchers looked at the influence of school uniforms against a wide urban school district in the southwest United States of America. School uniforms were always a controversial issue in the United States. For centuries, many researchers insisted on whether or not to wear school uniforms. In the United States, most public schools do not require students to wear uniforms. But at private schools students must wear uniforms. In most countries, school uniforms are required in both public and private schools. They have even summer and winter uniforms according to the weather. Most people

The discussion about my big high school sheep is relatively small. In order to see correctly, I graduated with 86 people. My class usually has factions. There are intelligent children, athletes, cheerleaders, drug addicts, lazy people. But somehow, I do not suit all of this. I am not, and now it is not the wisest person in world history. I am clumsy enough to play sports. I am not a suitable candidate to become a cheerleader. I have not even thought of using medicine, of course I am not lazy. In Sumer's poem "Debate between valley and sheep" there was neither grain, sheep, goat nor the Earth initially looked barren. People are naked. They grazing, eating nutrition, and drinking water from the groove. Later, the gods made sheep and cereals and gave them to humans as food. According to the "discussion between birds and fish", the water consumed by humans existed until the king Enki of wisdom made the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, allowing water to flow from there to the mountains. He also made small rivers and waterways, shepherds, swamps and reeds, filled with fish and birds. He founded the city, established the power of the kingdom, and governed foreign countries. In the "Winter and Summer Debates", the unknown Sumerian writers explained that summer and winter, rich spring floods and fertility are the result of Engel mating with Earth Mountain. This is one of the most controversial problems in today's world. After Ian Willmut and his colleagues at Scottish Roslin Institute created Dolly (Sheep Clone), it was a great success in cloning animals and the discussion between scientists and scientists on the concept of cloning improved (Bose, 2009) . But today's main argument is whether human beings should be cloned or not. Understanding the background knowledge on this concept is very important to understand why some opinions are opposed and some opinions are directed to this issue.

One of the biggest problems facing Christianity in the field of apology is scientific debate about creationism. This is a very interesting argument. Because they are not trying to prove different points such as "Big Bang Theory" or evolution theory, but accept all other assumptions as scientific facts and start with the assumption that Biblical science will be impossible. The following are some of the problems related to creationism summarized from the profound thinking website (Pettit): I. The problem of creationism is a logical dilemma A. The evidence for creating science The source is based entirely on the fact that the Bible is complete and inaccurate Creation - evolutionary controversy (also called creationism and evolution, also called origin theory) contains continually repeated cultural, political and theological issues about the origins of the earth, humans and other lives. In the Christian world, creationism was widely regarded as truth, but since the mid-nineteenth century evolution of natural selection has been established as an empirical scientific fact. Discussion is not scientific but philosophical. Evolution is considered a fact in the scientific world, and efforts to maintain traditional views are almost universally regarded as fake science. The controversy has a long history but today it has retired to constitute a good science education Creationist politics is mainly focused on the creation of education in public education. New creationism is a pseudo-scientific movement aimed at reaffirming creationism and is likely to be welcomed by the general public, policy makers, educators, and the scientific community. Its purpose is to rebuild the argument about the origin of life in a non-religious way, not relying on the Bible. This is an objection to the ruling of the US Supreme Court in Edwards versus Aguilard in 1987 and is an inherent religious concept that is claimed in the public school course to be correct or accurate. Establishment of the first revision The creation of science or the creation of science is a field of Genesis, scientifically supporting the creation of stories in Genesis, refuting or reinterpreting geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archeology, history I insist. And scientific scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms. Linguistics Search Noah's Ark - According to the flood of Genesis, it is trying to find a burial ground of Noah's Ark, somewhere in the so-called "Ararat Mountain Range". There were many explorations, but some of them were false successes; this practice is widely regarded as fake science, more specifically fake archeology.

The following are more than 50 major discussion topics on ProCon.org and their respective central issues. Topics usually include questions of pros and cons, arguments, expert quotes, historical backgrounds, reader reviews, videos, photos and more. ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with more than 25 million people every year, including more than 10,000 school educators. Assign or ask students to select ProCon.org theme ("Difficulty") to check. Students should select three professional referrals and three citations representing the main arguments on the ProCon.org website individually or in groups. For each citation, the student pays attention to the source of the citation, identifies the main idea of ​​the two citations, and uses the additional worksheets provided by English teacher W. Kip Morales of Smidt Tech High School to quote the citations Evaluate from 1 to 10. The following are more than 50 major discussion topics on ProCon.org and their respective central issues. Topics usually include questions of pros and cons, arguments, expert quotes, historical backgrounds, reader reviews, videos, photos and more. ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with more than 25 million people every year, including more than 10,000 school educators. Discussions in Congress can set themes within a few days to a few weeks from when the debate starts, or on the fly. In the debate of the US Congress, topic-specific topics are mainly used for one-on-one discussion and open discussion between the two schools in order to promote and promote the theme. By setting a theme, you can conduct preliminary research, brainstorming and practical discussion. However, in the discussion itself, the fewest notes were used, and the lectures and explanations were not read. Written quotes are used carefully or not at all. Discussions in the Congressional contest are usually instant and will be announced on a separate theme a few minutes before each round. Five 184. See also Robert Branham, "I failed to discuss": Malcolm X's prison debate and public confrontation, Discussion in Congress contains many kinds of topics. The theme changed from discussion to discussion. From time to time, the discussor can prepare a discussion for the next discussion in only 15 minutes. There are very few rules for discussion at Congress so let's summarize them here. Since there are states and allies that have added or changed these basic rules, we recommend that you check the rules of the tournament you are about to participate in and confirm that you meet the rules of the game .

Discussion on abortion Part A Abortion is an early exile from the fetus of the fetus. You need to take action to perform this operation. If two doctors agree to one of the following, abortion is legal. · Continuous pregnancy means there is a danger to women's health. Or, if her existing child is longer than the end of pregnancy, allowing for up to 24 weeks of pregnancy or continuing pregnancy, it is more severe than the end of pregnancy, severe in women's mental or physical health It deals damage. This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I decided to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. Both sides raised many topics in the discussion of abortion. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as human life. Because professional life believes that life begins with a concept, abortion is like murder, it is an act of robbing human life. now The symmetry resulting from the analysis of the main arguments on both sides of the discussion on abortion can explain why it seems difficult to solve the discussion on abortion. Consider the following discussion of standard anti-pregnancy abortion: the fetus is a human being and living. Human beings have the right to life. Therefore, the fetus has the right to live. Of course, women have the right to control their bodies, but the right of life is beyond the rights of women who control their bodies. Therefore, abortion is wrong. Judith Thomson (1971) argues that this argument fails even if a person gives the right of life to the fetus (for discussion only). Thomson encourages you to imagine that you are connected when you are sleeping, that blood is flowing into the blood, and that you are a famous violinist. Violinists with rare blood disorders will die if they break it. Thomson believes that you have the right to disconnect you.

The argument is whether the Industrial Revolution (see Industry History) raised or lowered the standard of living. A. J. Taylor (ed.), "Standards of British Life in the Industrial Revolution" (1975). Watch salary One of the most unique aspects of life-level non-pay indicators in life debate is the increasing complexity and diversity of resources used by historians. Demographic studies, public health and nutrition, and research on the positions of underrepresentatives so far deepened the discussion. Many recent studies highlight how much non-wage factors affect living standards. These are more funny because they dispute the assumptions pulled from wage statistics from time to time. For example, the urban working class seems to enjoy higher wages, but their wages are higher. Our view on British wages is mainly discussion about living standards. Even optimists who believe that the real wage of the industrial revolution has risen believe that wages in the 18th century are low. Although it is certainly lower than today, according to a recent survey on the history of wages and prices it turned out that the UK is a high wage economy in four areas. At the exchange rate, wages in the UK are higher than competitors. Higher wages of silver lead to a higher standard of living than other countries. British wages are high against capital prices. Wages in the north and west in the UK are unusually high compared to energy prices

Considering arguments such as nigga, scorpion, ass, etc will make you angry. The answer may seem obvious, but our country has worked hard to solve the problem of review almost after that idea. For many, the above vocabulary is part of their daily vocabulary; for others, they are vulgar and unacceptable. The censorship system is not just a word problem. There is a big controversy about literature, music, the negative concepts of television and the nature of graphics. Review discussion is long, both numbers seems to be equal. The censorship system exists in all forms of media, far beyond it. People who oppose are not to campaign completely unmodified countries, but only to minimize it, it is not a major part of our observation, listening and thinking. It is impossible and unrealistic to believe that the state can function properly unless you manage the information leaked to the public to some extent, but it is also worried that actions are taken as we think It is something I can not understand. . The problem we are faced with the country we live in. One of the advantages of the censorship system was during the Second World War. However, censorship is a controversial topic all over the world, but each country has its own regulations and policies. This comparative analysis will examine different views of the United States and the UK regarding censorship and inappropriate content. First of all, I will discuss the current US regulation, consider the problem, and describe plans and content that are considered inappropriate. Then I will clarify British censorship rules and discuss recent TV issues that caused controversy over lack of censoring policy. Finally, we compare the views of the censorship system and contrast themselves and focus on why the United States and the UK have different views on the degree of regulation required by their country. Freedom of expression and freedom of censorship - What is the pros and cons of having to review the media and the public? What are the terms of the review discussion? Is the censorship system rational or can freely control the voice of the media and the freedom of speech? What is the priority of religious, business and government censorship? Does someone benefit from reviewing information? Is it beneficial for society as a whole? The pros and cons of censorship is worth studying the role of deciphering freedom of speech in society and the role of different types of censorship.

Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. Many people argue that there is no relationship between disease and vaccination, others insist on the belief of Wakefield. Still, many autistic organizations still believe in the connection. Early in March 2008, vaccine autism debaucher recurs after acknowledging paying compensation to a 9 year old Georgian family who developed symptoms of autism after receiving regular vaccination for children. did. According to officials, a pediatric vaccine given to a girl in 2000 caused the experiment to gradually become phased out and then exacerbated existing symptoms before it appeared as symptoms like autism. According to the family, the existing condition is mitochondrial disease, cell's "energy source". The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court raised a case showing that the MMR vaccine caused the Urabe mumps flu virus strain. The reader believes that his article is a controversial article. Both authors agree to dismiss essential HPV vaccines, but each vaccine has its own belief. While using various methods, Allen's tone and language in his work is different from Adam's article. Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. - Introduction of influenza. Meningitis tetanus. There are hundreds of different infectious diseases that measles individuals can contract from others directly or indirectly through the air they breathe. For many infections, some people have to figure out ways to prevent the spread of these diseases. Therefore, the concept of immunization was born. Discussions that are not influenced by facts can go anywhere. Those who believe that immunization causes autism can lead to the recurrence of diseases that we believe have long conquered. Those who deny evidence linking global warming to carbon emissions will not even consider adopting a gentle plan to get out of trouble. Thompson's book is an introduction to the history of public discourse, beginning with ancient Greeks, in a series of lectures at Oxford University. Exaggeration is always a characteristic of persuasion of the world. The instigator always expresses hatred to a particular group or other group. Thompson analyzed the words of Donald Trumpe in detail, and shows how his short-lived, confident and repeated claim is appealing to many voters. He also explained the feelings of the victim, for example the scream of a Halloween costume at Yale University - how do you make people feeling oppression "supposed to be oppressors"?

Throughout history, the climate has undergone a turbulent change. The transition from warm climate to the ice ages has changed (Cunningham & Cunningham, 2009, p. 204). There is evidence that there has been at least 12 sudden climate changes throughout the earth's history. There are several suspicious reasons for these past climate change. One reason may be that asteroids hit the Earth and volcanic eruptions caused some of them. A further hypothesis is that the 22-year solar magnetic cycle and the 11-year black spot cycle play a role in these changes. Today's debate about global warming reflects that era. For political reasons posts intended for such notification only affect a very small number of people. However, I want to understand from the bottom of my heart, but I talked with a skepticist who does not have tools to deal with such large and complex fields of science. They have perspectives - we talked much about the data, but we rarely explain the way to conclusions. With their question, I started digging. I have found a concept rarely mentioned in the discussion of global warming: science actually has a way to decide on one thing that leads to another thing. Scientists do not need to vote on this issue - climate scientists believe that 97% consensus on human warming is convincing, but only a small part of the wider process. There is a way for those who want to honestly evaluate their doubts in the context of evidence For most people, the idea of ​​global warming is a very controversial and highly controversial topic. However, there is no real evidence that global warming is a serious problem, or that global warming is a major fear strategy for people to comply with stringent government regulations. It is widely believed that global warming is a major cause of global average temperature rise. In fact, global warming is not all global warming that is actually exaggerated. - When many people think about their future, they usually only consider what will affect their personal lives or benefit. Whether they like the cities they live in, or whether they will do the same work in five years. There are few people who think about what will happen in the surroundings. Global warming, also called greenhouse effect, is an increase in the global temperature of the Earth's atmosphere.

Intelligence can be defined in various ways. This concept is the focus of much research and investigation by psychologists and other scientific experts. Intelligence can be a psychological ability to infer, plan prospectively, understand complex problems, and learn from past experiences (Gottfredson, 1997). Intelligence is the result of the process of "acquiring, preserving, storing, retrieving, combining, comparing, and using information and conceptual skills in a new environment" (Humphreys, 1979). Measures such as IQ (IQ) developed by Alfred Binet in the early 20th century In the last century, cognitive development or intelligence quotient was the main purpose of education. The concept of EQ and emotional intelligence has also gained popularity over the past two decades and the discussion between EQ and IQ remains strong. Some "progressive" schools can help children identify and deal with their emotions (called "soft skills"). However, it is thought to be different from IQ. We encourage static thought)) There are new problems in cities. Five reasons to develop dynamic intelligence in education, health care and business. The era when IQ was considered the only major determinant of success is forever gone. More and more research shows that our EQ plays a big role, not IQ, in achieving our goals. Our IQ is only 25% of the result of our lives and the remaining 75% is considered to be related to emotional ability. At some point, IQ is considered the main determinant of success. People with high IQ are believed to be in the fate of achievement and attainment life, and researchers claim that intelligence is a product of genes or the environment (old arguments about nature and cultivation). However, some critics have begun to recognize that Kochi also not only guarantees the success of life but also concepts that are too narrow to cover human capabilities and knowledge broadly. Intelligence is not a superpowder; excellent wisdom alone will not provide you with special abilities appropriate to your environment. However, although the original cognitive ability - although this may be controversial - is measured by IQ - there is the fact that it is related to the social achievement of spectral slices close to the average. This was first confirmed by Terman's research and later confirmed by others. For example, in 2006 Strenze 's extensive metastatic research found that there was a clear correlation between IQ and socio - economic success. Therefore, a person with IQ of 130 is likely to succeed in solving the problem of life more than IQ 70 people - not guaranteed at the individual level - but this is a fact.

Children living with their parents said, "Risk of living in poverty is higher than children living with parents, the risk of experiencing health, academic and behavioral problems is high," the study shows It is. . The social welfare umbrella is new, but the healthy marriage program has existed for decades and it is effective to improve the relationship satisfaction and romantic couple communication, social science It is considered by a person. There was discussion about marriage long before discussion about gay marriage. It started a "marriage campaign" to explain why marriage is good for both men and women who are faithful to their responsibilities, and for good for the children they grow. In the past decade, new problems emerged: What do society need to lose by redefining marriage to eliminate sexual complementarity? Many citizens are increasingly inclined to think that marriage is only a strong emotional alliance, no matter what interpersonal relationships are with adults, whether it is 2 to 10 or not. . This is not a necessary feature of marriage, and there is no fixed core as social reality. This is the consent of what an adult wants. Marriage is a state filled institution. Society limits marriage, from age to race, social status, blood relationship, sex. Because it brings benefits to children, provides healthy genes, maintains cultural value, or is due to prejudice and fear. Almost all cultures recognizing marriage recognize that adultery violates the terms of marriage. In most jurisdictions, the minimum age of marriage is stipulated. In other words, someone must meet a certain age legally allowed to get married. This age varies according to the situation. For example, if a young parent announces consent, or the court determines that marriage is the best interest for young people, an exception (usually applicable) will be granted in the case of a girl's pregnancy. Most of us have bridges across young people, and women spend more time, especially social conditions - bridges are marriage. I am not here to discuss whether marriage is a credit or a need, so I am not by you, apart from the hammer This job is really for men who want to get married Thing. Let's continue. Promotion of college degree may help many young people to put a longer burden if you believe that your family has one educational background is the main requirement for marriage. They fit you like a glove. If you graduated from college as a woman, you are already seeing 25-27 or more. If you are kissing 30 for that person, you need it during college. Important Marriage Strategies

Discussion of the Dam From the late 1800s to the early 1900s, naturalist John Muir and San Francisco engineer Marsden Manson made intense debate about the construction of the Hatchy Hatchy Valley dam. Since Muir wanted to preserve the future of nature, I opposed the dam. That is because I felt that it would hurt the beauty of the area. Meanwhile, Manson believes that by building a dam it will provide water and electricity to thousands of people living in San Francisco. California's O'Shaughnessy Dam was completed in 1923 and represents the first major environmental controversy in the United States built in a national park. Discussions about dams and reservoirs continue today. Protective groups like the Sierra Club have been working to restore the valley, but I believe that leaving the dam will be a better economic and environmental decision. The remaining two dams of the Kinnickinnic River in River Falls, Wisconsin are considering dismantling to restore the Kinnickinnic River to its natural state. The Kinnickinnic River called Kinni is a river of 35 km (22 miles) northwest of Wisconsin. Kinni is a cold water fishery that supports local Brook trout and breeds brown trout naturally. In the early 1980s, the state discussed the proposed Franklin River dam. Many Australians outside of Tasmania have a dam prevention atmosphere and proved the factor of the 1983 Hook Labor Party election that discontinued the construction of the dam. Since the 1980s, environmental concerns have shifted to the old logging and mining that is growing in the Tarkine area, but both have been proven to be divided. The Tasmania joint proposal suggests to end deforestation of highly protected old forest by January 2003, but it has not been successful Is construction of hot spring dam based on wrong logic? Authorities have proposed this idea for 80 years. This controversial building caused intense debate for 50 years, 30 years since the dam was built. Looking back at the discussion on the construction of hot spring dams, it turns out that the controversy is the most interesting part of the process. After the construction of the hot spring dam began, the citizens of Sonoma County did not agree; they welcomed enthusiastically against their expansion or enthusiasm.

Discussion of North American Free Trade Agreement and Labor Controversy From the late 1980s to the early 1990s, trade agreements are rapidly increasing all over the world. The North American Free Trade Agreement (the text of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the American National Organization) is one of the largest and most influential countries. In 1993, the three countries of North America, Canada and Canada signed regional trade agreements. As is widely known, the North American Free Trade Agreement or the North American Free Trade Agreement is the effort initiated by the United States. The response of American trade unions to naphtha and the way they form arguments reflects the result of weak labor relations and the wage hypothesis that is rooted in welfare agencies and the increase in unemployment so naphtha Somewhat inconsistent with the refusal of. In the 1980s, the actual income of American workers was definitely getting worse. Workers are also more vulnerable to unemployment, mainly due to the loss of health insurance and other benefits related to the employment of the particular company they are implying. However, the union mainly concerned about unemployment and ignore the decrease in real income. In addition, the union did not pay attention to the recent rise in the unemployment rate, but instead chose to focus on the assumption unemployment rate associated with naphtha. Therefore, it seems to explain the branching reaction - During the Naphtha debate, the union conducted a deep diagnosis of the problems faced by American workers, revealing a thorough understanding of the basic structure and institutional reasons. This approach seems to announce an ambitious political agenda aimed at revealing the underlying cause of the problems facing American workers in the era of globalization. They say that the American economy experienced a sharp decline in the 1980s as producers could not compete with other countries in the world market. As a result, the United States lost thousands of jobs and accumulated a bad trade deficit (a legislative fact sheet of AFL - CIO.Mexico 's free trade agreement: Mexican unemployment on March 1, 1991 and Mexican workers Exploitation, AFL-CIO. Trade: Our position, 1992) AFL-CIO emphasized that it can not compete with other exporters in terms of quality and design. The GMP Treaty calls on Congress to dismiss Bush's trade agreement on 31st August 1992

Although there are various forms, the practice of euthanasia is the process of ending human life. Various forms of euthanasia are active and passive euthanasia. Physicians can also perform this type of surgery in a variety of ways. This sequence of actions can usually be used to accelerate death for serious medical patients. According to personal view, some people may define that people are released from pain, but others refer to euthanasia as suicide assistance. The purpose of this euthanasia is to inform the reader clearly and consistently the terms and problems in the discussion of euthanasia and understand the problem of euthanasia. In this explanation, we use languages ​​other than relatively simple technology to facilitate learning. The definition of euthanasia is simple: "Simple and painless death". However, the concept of euthanasia suggested by supporters of the euthanasia movement is complex and has a great impact on everyone. Since the subject includes medical fields (diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, medical ethics, etc.) and legal fields, the general public is difficult to understand without knowing anything. California and Washington state voters refuse to support suicide, but discussion of euthanasia will continue. In this public policy debate, religion plays an important role. But I think the discussion of euthanasia is a sign of a deeper cultural debate about the essence and meaning of human life. Certain basic principles can be expressed in terms of religious and secular language and can lead to the opposite of euthanasia. People involved in discussions of euthanasia often pay attention to the role of religion. Many people are concerned that the involvement of religious leaders is an inappropriate attempt to press religious morals against society. However, the Constitution protects religious pluralism of our country, not practicing religious beliefs, or ensuring that those who do not believe in religion are not excluded from participation in public policy planning. However, this participation is based on two differences. Historically, discussion of euthanasia has often focused on many important issues. According to Ezekiel Emmanuel, opponent of euthanasia, advocates of euthanasia advocated four main arguments: a) people should have the right to self-determination and hence be allowed to choose their own destiny . A better choice; c) the difference between passive euthanasia often seen and active euthanasia, this euthanasia is not essential (or basic principle - principle of dual effect - absurdity or silence); d) euthanasia May lead to unacceptable results that are not necessarily allowed. Euthanasia activists often refer to countries like the Netherlands and Belgium and I think that countries like Oregon where euthanasia is legalized have little problem.

At the Olympic Committee 's debate held in Oakland, California, school officials last week decided to finalize a nationwide war on the "ebony" solution in this area by modifying the core settlement of the conflict I took action. However, the observer says that there is a high possibility that discussions of Auckland and other ebony in other areas will continue in the future. After several hours of internal conflict, the Board of Education by the district's seven members voted to unanimously pass the revised wording at the special committee of January 15. Members of the regional working group were formed to provide improved educational approaches to African-American students in Auckland. Initial resolution unanimously approved by the Board of Directors in December The true Ebony controversy since 1973 details the history of Evonik since 1973 (the name combining "Ebony" and "Pinyin"). American racial discrimination and coding media phrases This book is essential to understanding this controversial issue in the coming years. In addition to famous papers and poems by Toni Morrison, James Baldwin, Paul Laurence Dunbar, the most important document of this series is a copy of the revised version of the actual Oakland Black solution and Ebonics solution. ... In order to promote access and acquisition of English while respecting and accepting the validity and abundance of the language model, it is necessary to immediately develop and implement the best academic curriculum. - Eugene Holley Jr. Naturally, Evonik 's discussion entered the agenda of the American Language Institute. In 1997, the Association passed a resolution seeking the recognition of ebony, as well as the African-American proper noun English (AAVE) and the proper noun black English, which is considered to follow systematic and linguistic rules . However, society is refusing to accept classification problems, as the distinction between "language" and "choice" or "change" is often more for social and political reasons than for pure linguistics . From the viewpoint of those languages ​​and education, what is important is not whether Ebonics or AAVE is called "language", but as with variants of other languages, they are considered to be subject to systematic and linguistic rules. Introduction The discussion about Ebonics actually attracted the attention of the media. In the beginning of 1997, the Oakland School District proposal to use Ebonics to help African American children learn standard English was opposed. With the help of the American Language Institute, few people support Oakland 's resolution recognizing Ebonics as a language genre with its own grammar, structure, and grammar rules. - The media object selected for analysis is Daguerreotype. Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre (1787-1851) is a romantic painter and printmaker who released a silver version of the photographic version on January 7, 1839, will change the visual experience forever through photos (Daniel, 2004). . Since the advent of Daeger Silver Edition, people were able to observe the detailed stamp of the visual frame on the treated copper plate (now called the movie) (Daniel, 2004).

Ethical controversy about cloning The following year when Dory was born, there was much debate about the ethical impact of cloning. The simple use of the word "clone" may have a negative meaning, but many people think that producing more milk or using cloned mice for controlled experiments I had to overcome it. However, the idea of ​​creating human clones is a very paid topic. Cloning ethics is a big field. The right to reproduce people is quite controversial. Can we clone humans, or do we really want to clone humans for this? The morality and morality of this problem is infinite. There is little support for human cloning, but it has many advantages. The opponents of some clones believe that these people are badly wrong. Many of these mistakes involve denying Joel Feinberg's "right to open the future". For example, since children are compared with adults because they are cloned, repressive expectations are received. To make matters worse, parents may actually limit opportunities for growth and growth. For example, children cloned from basketball players may be deprived of educational opportunities that do not match their basketball career. Ethical Discussion on Cloning In the article entitled "Politics of Biotechnology, Ethics and Cloning", the authors Steven Best and Douglas Kellner explain the pros and cons of cloning and discuss the ethical issues related to cloning I will. They give examples and judge them from various angles. They believe that the entire biotechnology field is full of dangers and problems and that serious research and democratic arguments are necessary for important ethical issues. They also believe that in times when everything depends on technology, you can create life in the Petri dish, redesign, and edit the genetic code like digital text . There are many ethical problems surrounding human cloning, and there is no agreement on these ethical issues. Most ethical implications are theological concerns and different religious views that allege that human clones change what God wants and change the way the human baby is born. Many religious organizations believe that embryos must be regarded as humans and the therapeutic cloning behavior of stem cells extracted from embryos is the same as human killing. Because of this belief, many people oppose human cloning by ending their lives to make others live longer (Putatunda, 2007).

My theme focuses on my argument about Rosenbaum's defense of food perspective, Rupper's criticism of this perspective, and who is taking a stronger stand on this issue. We will do this by explaining these two parameters in detail. When Rober objected to it, Rosenbaum defended the eating opinion. Rosenbaum defended Gourmet's view in his articles. Epicuras says "death is neither good nor bad for the dead, because the fear of one person is unfounded for one person, the fear of death is irrational" (Benatar, 175). I only noticed a century of contribution since the Hellenistic era. This era was dominated by the controversy between the epicurean school, the stoic school, academic skeptics, and because of the will of freedom, the argument is the determinism or the role of fate in managing human behavior and life I focused on. Stoic and Epicureans believe that all ordinary things, including the human soul, are material and follow nature's laws or principles. Stoic Sc ​​hool believes that all human choices and behaviors are determined by causality, but this is compatible with our "self" behavior. Chrysippus says that when your action "passes through you" your action is "by you" and that the deciding factor of your action stops according to your action rather than your own choice I insist that it is not a strong thing to the external environment, I will deliberately keep this position in front of you in your opinion of your choice The third thought we analyzed was epicureanism. For people of Epicurean, happiness is the source of happiness. Epicurean's concept of happiness may be far from the original idea, but these ideas often lead to the idea of ​​pursuing happiness. For epicurus, the heart of happiness is to use practical wisdom, or to know how to pursue what is good for you in a pain free life. Notably, in the letter to Mynoeceus, Epicurus details the relationship between various forms of happiness and its happiness. This is far from the epiculus philosophy. Hedonism promotes seeking happiness; but the pleasure you are seeking is not the happiness of the body, but the happiness of the soul, no interference, no interference is most important; Epicuras strives to eliminate external interference. As the most important materialist in the ancient world, Epicuras taught and wrote extensively on the nature of matter, especially the laws and emotions of atoms and their movement. Although he did not deny the existence of God, he rejected the power the myths gave them and the concept of actively interfering with their human lives. Historic materialist Karl Marx wrote a doctoral thesis of Epicurus, and Democrats are not coincidental.

The school administrator (principal, vice president etc.) wants to change the graduation requirement so that service learning is included in at least three essential courses (English, mathematics, history etc). I can graduate. Before the administrator makes the final decision, they want to hear the students' opinions on the change. Assuming the following scenario, you can start finding solutions to the problem. If the Russian door could not be advertised, the face of the mass media consent to manufacture machinery will continue to dominate the other countries on the earth in order for the United States to collapse the goals of China and its allies We must take fundamental actions to rekindle the Cold War to ensure that For visual representation, refer to the following hypothetical scenario. A fictitious participation between Alex Ostwald and me who is the creator of the business model canvas. Basically, in this fictitious scenario, I am trying to talk to Alex in a way that goes beyond traditional followers and followers. Perhaps, if I would like to approach Alex in the hypothetical scenario above, my chances of accepting my invitation are small. First of all, he is very busy; ask me about it. Second, he does not know me much. However, if this is done within the ecosystem, it includes rigorous governance and planning agreements, and properly designed incentive structures. The likelihood of being accepted is much higher So the left is facing a few questions that I think they should not begin. It presents a special dilemma. Let's imagine a completely hypothetical scenario in which Americans discuss whether the Nazi riots in Charlottesville are bad nationwide. It will only promote a mean stance towards their position. It's not worth it. But the cards are the president, the ugly idea is to buy. Seriously we will not evaporate them to ether. A hypothesis is a question presented in the form of a situation or a difficult question to consider the meaning of a belief. These are often referred to as "virtual" scenarios or "moral dilemmas" and are most often used as a "trap" moment in an argument trying to make an opponent not look like my point of view . They are often called "pre-planned" strategies, where possible answers are considered, and in general, answers may give some contradictory or embarrassing reactions from respondents. With this, yes, the questioner said the Christians crazy. No, you are opposed to God, how hypocritical you are!

Discussions on controversial debate about homosexual marriage on whether to legalize same-sex marriage have attracted a lot of attention in recent years and there is a strong debate on both sides of this issue. When considering gay marriage, it is necessary to consider various factors. Marriage is not just a piece of paper to show a couple's love, it contains legal, social, economic and spiritual problems. Throughout this article, I will focus on all the issues I mentioned and how they all relate in some way. Discussion of same sex marriage Gay marriage is a very controversial topic based on marriage. Politics, government, constitutional freedom and equality played a role in gay marriage debate. - Initially, after choosing my theme, I was planning to pay attention to the Muslim marriage tradition - but the more I study, the more corruption appears in the sacrament It was. I do not know all of you, but I think it is more interesting to controversial. I would like to talk in front of this statement, but many of the customs I'm about to talk about are widely accepted in the Middle East - but this does not justify them. Abstract: Some gay marriage activists may want to exclude certain moral and religious views from the same-sex marriage debate. However, there is evidence that religious and moral arguments are often used to support gay marriages. All believers, or those who do not have any faith, should freely participate in marriage discussions and present a moral perspective on these issues. Progress of gay marriage debate has renewed attention to the status of religion and morality in shaping the definition of the Marriage Law. For example, after the voter passed the California State Marriage Amendment No. 8, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was severely criticized and was based on the support of this measure. Well, in a federal lawsuit contesting the proposal of No. 8, one problem is whether the evidence of religious support for Proposition 8 will somehow doubt this measure. California was one of the most active battlefields in gay marriage debate. This struggle began in 2000 when voters in the state passed Proposition 22. Proposition 22 defines marriage as a unity between men and women. Four years later, following the legalization of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts State, San Francisco began issuing marriage certificates to same-sex couples. This is a movement that the State Supreme Court quickly condemned. In September 2005, the California State Council became the first state legislature to deliberately approve gay marriage. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger finally rejected the bill under Proposition 22. Currently the California Supreme Court is considering whether Proposition 22 violates the state constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law.

The death penalty seems to be a very controversial topic. There are arguments and support on both sides of the argument, which side is correct? This is a difficult problem. After reading the other two articles in the textbook and looking at the statistics, I think that the death penalty may not be the correct answer. The text of the textbook "Death Penalty in the United States and around the world" is considerably abundant. One of the suggested points is the cost of living and the death penalty without parole, this is called life without parouses, costs 1 million dollars and the death penalty costs 3 million dollars (Schaefer , Richard T, 2009 pg 176). The death penalty debate about the death penalty has caused extensive controversy. Please do not select this topic as there is debate. However, the death penalty is a problem that needs to be resolved. Should the death penalty be abolished from our criminal justice system? Well, that depends on who you ask. If you ask me ... No. I personally do not see any problems in the death penalty because there are socially risky criminals and death is the only criminal. ... The author of the book, James Fernner, said "Mentally retarded are not in the death penalty". "If a person's intelligence level is significantly below the average, he is usually considered a mentally retarded person, as it usually records IQ below 70 points and there is no adaptive behavior under 18 years of age The Association, it has three elements: 1. It is significantly lower than the average intellectual function. 2. Associated damage A detailed explanation of the recent death penalty in Illinois, including John J. Kinsella's "Chicago Tribune", the so-called "13 Disclaimers", Rolando Cruz and the prosecutor's discussion. The first state prosecutor in DuPage County. According to opinion polls, Europeans and Canadians are almost as supportive of the death penalty as the Americans, the death penalty: prudent response to malicious acts, investigation by the Ministry of Justice in filing a federal executions to the racial or ethnic prejudice Did not the death penalty save the innocent life? The death penalty of racist God, the death sentence opponents apply erroneous logic, Lieberman's death sentence "investigation" is inaccurate and when a murderer is executed, a nun says the church's bell I'm trying to ring. As usual, innocent victims have no bell

Death penalty debate In this country, the death penalty is a difficult debate and overwhelming debate. Three months ago, we died as a fatal injection by Timothy McVeigh. You can support and oppose the death penalty, but this is not a problem. The death penalty should be the deterrent of crime, but the capital punishment is certainly a deterrent. The death penalty is not a deterrent of crime, the influence of the death penalty actually hurts the American people. Discussion on the death penalty has raised many questions about the relationship between pragmatism and moral principles. If perpetrators are found guilty, this problem becomes complicated. Since 1973, after being convicted of new evidence and technological progress, more than 130 people have been released from death row prisoners. Many death penal offenders are based on an investigation showing that the death penalty is deterrence of crime or racial prejudice against minorities. Besides, the death sentence that forces the government to have a tremendous economic burden is pointed out and it often restricts the quality of lawyers accused of defending defendants. But those who oppose the death penalty for moral reasoning say that such considerations should not be the most important, but may be counterproductive, if later studies would compromise these arguments. The death penalty, also known as the death penalty, is a ruling requiring the use of deadly forces to high-risk prisoners. This form of punishment has become a controversial topic in many discussions. There are 58 countries currently using the capital punishment in the justice system, and 97 countries have decided to completely abolish the death penalty. Canada decided to abolish the death penalty in Canada's criminal law in 1976 and believes that abolition has some positive influence on the Canadian justice system. "Whether to abolish the abolition of the death penalty" Although many people are demanding the complete abolition of the death penalty, others say that the death penalty is very important as it is a powerful deterrent. . For example, in New Zealand, according to a recent poll, 55% of the people in the country oppose the death penalty. But in South Africa, polls showed that 76% of South African young adults supported the death penalty and are trying to reintroduce it to their own country. Currently, South Africa abolishes the death penalty or death penalty. So then why does some people support the death penalty as opposed to others? This means that there must be some positive and negative aspects that we will see in this article.

The stability change controversy explains the developmental psychology debate about whether the personality characteristics existing in an individual at birth remain constant or change throughout the life cycle. For example, are outgoing and talkative babies maintaining such a life? Discussion about stability and change is one of the fundamental problems related to the development of psychology and nature and cultivation. Generally, cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies are used in research on stability and variation. According to the tools used by Giobtetti Associates, stability is defined as a non emotional approach. Whether or not emotions lack stability is controversial, but one thing we can not discuss is communication. Many successful female executives have learned to hide this, but women are the biggest thing they measured, only 16 points, more emotional than men. To summarize the results, Giombetti says, "The aggressive 800 pound gorilla is dead, our survey examines their perception of female executives." A broken relationship pays compensation ", and personal time is very limited For example, are outgoing and talkative babies maintaining such a life? Discussion about stability and change is one of the fundamental problems related to the development of psychology and nature and cultivation. Generally, cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies are used in research on stability and variation. Treating this situation as a relationship between family breakdown and family stability and adaptive recovery makes the essence of the change process too simple. On the contrary, in this chapter, the present discussion about families and the difficulties faced by most families today are not due to fundamental social change but because of the contradictory nature of the change It is. Incomplete and unequal social change has created a new personal dilemma, a balance between promises of parents and employment, and new and non-traditional solutions and workplace demands between people and their families . Social Conflict These dilemmas and conflicts constitute the core issue of the new generation of women, men and children to tackle.

As discussions on reproductive health are currently intensifying, the citizens of the United States recently criticized the media for overreporting issues related to birth control and women's rights. In this era, sudden attacks on contraception and contraception law seems rather ridiculous. In my opinion, American citizens often break up on the argumentless problem that such statements are unproductive and that most of us seem to be cryptic. In addition, women's health rights disputes are currently impairing the myriad achievements of countless activists and foresight that can go back to the Foundation of the Republic. In the 1990s, women 's rights movement called for new discussions. Most discussions are debating beyond the issue of equal rights. Female reproductive rights Roe v. The Supreme Court ruling on Wade claims that women can end their pregnancy for 30 years from the first two semesters, but there is still controversy. Current President George W Bush is anti - abortion law. This is also a big problem for women's rights. Discussions on women's voting rights continue to increase. In 1959, a vigorous debate about women's voting rights was held in Congress. In 1962, under the status of Prime Minister Assad Asara, the order was instituted to give women the right to vote for local and town elections and give them the right to participate. However, under the pressure of the horse, this law was withdrawn by the Prime Minister. As a sign of protest, the woman refused to commemorate the opening of Shear. Women also held various strikes and various female professional associations, including teachers, civil servants and employees of the private sector. Two days after the strike, a vote on whether the Iranian people would support Shah's six-point plan was made. Women vote in separate ballot boxes. The women's ballot paper overwhelmingly supported Shah's order, and on 27 February 1963 women's voting rights and voting rights were given again.

Besides the women's rights movement, there is nothing more controversial than the debate about reproductive rights. As the campaign gains momentum, the need to abolish birth control, sex education, family planning, and all abortion laws is also rising. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court declared abortion "basic rights" Roy v. Wade's decision announced. This sentence admits that the rights of individuals "fundamentally influence the right to avoid unnecessary infringement of the government and to decide whether to terminate the pregnancy as a woman" (US Supreme Court, 1973). Legislation of everyone's abortion What are the ironical things surrounding the social and psychological impacts on women, severely restricting access to female sexual and reproductive health, and the discussion on reproductive rights? (For example, in a lawsuit in a hobby lobby, the Supreme Court judged that the rights related to company personality are greater / more valuable than women's rights, and decided what the influence on women and girls is. Is a group, and what is the social, economic and psychological outcome of society as a whole? Besides the women's rights movement, there is nothing more controversial than the debate about reproductive rights. As the campaign gains momentum, the need to abolish birth control, sex education, family planning, and all abortion laws is also rising. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court held Roe v. Announced a decision to declare Wade's abortion as "basic right". The ruling recognizes that the rights of individuals are "indemnified from inherently unpopular government violations" Women's reproductive rights are legitimate rights and freedoms concerning reproductive and reproductive health. Reproductive rights include reproductive rights, the right to legal abortion, the right to receive education, access to choices based on appropriate information, and the right to health care related to high quality reproductive. Women's reproductive rights and freedom movements far exceed the theme of abortion, reproductive reproduction is a fundamental right to be given to everyone. Unfortunately, some of us have no birthrate. In today's world new interest is increasing for women who can not self-propagate due to in vitro fertilization, the provision of eggs or sperm, and the reproductive technology such as pregnancy substitutes. Legal, ethical and ethical issues are raised about these concepts of nature and these advanced regeneration methods used to replace birth.

Higher education debate is the price of higher education being discussed among American politicians. Legislators are worried about the increase in the cost of acquiring the degree of the university and the reduction of the debt burden of the student. Therefore, these issues are topics of the presidential campaign campaign. The pressure to pay tuition is not only from the government but also from the family, I think they are willing to pay high tuition fees. The first link between current economic crisis analysis and higher education debate includes public / private aspects. The problem of sustainability of higher education is increasingly constrained by a larger economic debate about fiscal policy. The main driving force of the neoliberal reaction to the crisis of the 1970s was to reduce the role of states and taxation to release the market force for better resource allocation. However, the sustainability of such a system is theoretically controversial, as automatic reversal of long-term inequality is questioned by the long-term wealth turmoil brought about by economic growth ( Krugman, 2008; Piketty, 2014; Stiglitz). , 2012), especially after 2008 The second important aspect of economic and higher education debate is inequality. The recession can be regarded as an unequal crisis that is caused by increased tensions between re-establishment and redistribution of unconditional tax increases and is obscured by the increase in private debt. In a sense, higher education can be considered creator and recipient of these inequities. Social inequality tends to be repeated in schools, and at the higher education level a number of inequalities are explained (Bourdieu and Passeron, 1964). This is interpreted differently. For cost-sharing supporters, this means that costs are not liable inequitably (free Higher Education systems are not equal). More than anything, fees do not increase inequality as graduates gain more income and rush into high income groups. The passage of the Higher Education Act of 1965 greatly increased federal investment in higher education and provided subsidies and loans to public and private university students. In 1971, the Senate Educational Subcommittee of the United States discussed the bill proposed by Senator Claiborne Pell and declared that the Federal government's policy of "allowing all young people's rights to advance regardless of the family's financial condition" It was established. The Truman Committee acknowledged that the tuition fee of the university hindered doubling the number of university students in 1947 (from 3 million in 1947 to 6 million in 1960). . The committee is taking measures to establish a more affordable higher education institution but most importantly it is a community college of that country - Senator Pell and his colleagues also recognize that university compensation subsidies are also important Believe that

Discussion on whether the death penalty is ethical is a long-term debate, depending on which aspects of the problem you are facing. Both sides of this problem have their view, but there is always something about this regarding keeping it at the forefront. The right to life is not necessarily twice as a matter of course, but due to the laws of this country, the freedom we take for granted may be eliminated by the mistakes we make. From the two perspectives of this problem, you can gain insight as to why this is still a related issue and will continue discussion not only in civil matters but also in many assertions in today's court system. The death penalty debate about the death penalty has caused extensive controversy. Please do not select this topic as there is debate. However, the death penalty is a problem that needs to be resolved. Should the death penalty be abolished from our criminal justice system? Well, that depends on who you ask. If you ask me ... No. I personally do not see any problems in the death penalty because there are socially risky criminals and death is the only criminal. ... The author of the book, James Fernner, said "Mentally retarded are not in the death penalty". "If a person's intelligence level is significantly below the average, he is usually considered a mentally retarded person, as it usually records IQ below 70 points and there is no adaptive behavior under 18 years of age The Association, it has three elements: 1. It is significantly lower than the average intellectual function. 2. Associated damage A detailed explanation of the recent death penalty in Illinois, including John J. Kinsella's "Chicago Tribune", the so-called "13 Disclaimers", Rolando Cruz and the prosecutor's discussion. The first state prosecutor in DuPage County. According to opinion polls, Europeans and Canadians are almost as supportive of the death penalty as the Americans, the death penalty: prudent response to malicious acts, investigation by the Ministry of Justice in filing a federal executions to the racial or ethnic prejudice Did not the death penalty save the innocent life? The death penalty of racist God, the death sentence opponents apply erroneous logic, Lieberman's death sentence "investigation" is inaccurate and when a murderer is executed, a nun says the church's bell I'm trying to ring. As usual, innocent victims have no bell In 2011 Illinois abolished the death penalty. As the Illinois state criminal justice system was afraid to impose death penalty on innocent people, when George Ryan gave a death sentence to each prisoner's judgment, a controversial discussion on the abolition of the death penalty in 2000 Began. The death penalty is controversial and often controversial. This discussion focuses on important issues such as: Does the state have legal and moral rights to execute citizens? How do you avoid avoiding being an innocent person? Because the death penalty can not be restored, it is important that there is no error in executions of convicted people.

Discussion on Human Resources Management: Performance-based compensation is an important discussion team to achieve results Politically driven reforms such as interview fees reflect merely the frustration of the public. "- Wilms and Chapleau Pay's performance fees are not for employee's profit or for the interests of the company, a tool to attract and use the best talent in the market, a complex bribery system. In order to open this discussion, we need to define the meaning of the term "International Human Resources Management". The survey of this term indicates that the focus is on how to operate personnel management functions in multinational companies, similarities and differences in management in each country, and how to integrate business culture into international boundaries I will. However, there are few concerns about multinational workforce growing in the UK and they may be affected by British institutions, procedures, laws, but their way of thinking and management methods have a strong personal impact receive. National culture may differ greatly from British culture Since the advent of British Human Resource Management (HRM) in the 1980's there was discussion about transferring all aspects of human resources management to department managers (Gennard and Kelly, 1997; Hall and Torrington, 1998). In fact, in the past decade, scholars and practitioners in the UK and Europe were very concerned about shifting personnel activities to line managers (Larsen and Brewster, 2003). Various reasons for decentralization are cited such as restructuring, shrinking and increasing attention to the competitive advantage of employees (Cunningham and Hyman, 1999; Renwick, 2000; and Gibb, 2003). Storey (1995) emphasizes the important role of line managers in providing personnel management in explaining the differences between human resources management and human resource management (HRM). Therefore, the function that is repeatedly defined in the discussion of human resources management is the role of the "central stage" of the line manager (Renwick, 2003: 262). Personnel management or personnel management is one of the trends in modern management and is aimed at the organization and development of human resources of specific companies. The primary objective of the Human Resources department is to recruit, train, improve, and motivate employees. Human resources management processes include the formation, organization, creation and development of organized human resources. If your goal is to become a personnel management expert, the human resources management research thesis is a general job, unless you rely on reference and discussion to prove personal opinions and facts You should remember not to. As this theme is constantly evolving, students need to understand every part of this change. In order to effectively complete HRM allocation, you need to pay attention to the following information.

"Global warming is not a conqueror in the past -. It is a big challenge we must confront this challenge." - Joe Lieberman and global warming at the beginning, greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, water vapor , methane, chlorofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, nitrous oxide) functions as a blanket to cover the earth, heat can be prevented from escaping into space, which means that raising the temperature of the earth. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence to support this is certainly a problem facing the world, global warming debate about global warming is continuing. Scientists, but indicates that the global warming is in the "turning point", of government around the world, not have decided the effort to argue that the Earth is in the face of such vulnerability Hmm. In today's world, the war between global warming alertist and global warming skeptics seems to intensify. This hinders cooperation on this problem and hinders real progress that reduces or reverses global warming. One of the biggest problems we face now is global warming. The impact on animals and agriculture is truly terrifying and the impact on the population is even more serious. The facts about global warming, but has been frequently discussed in the political and media, unfortunately, even though we were inconsistent with its causes, effects of global warming are realistic, global scale, and can be measured is. The reason for this is mainly due to us humans, the influence on us is serious. Our growing power dependence on coal-fired power plants releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. 40% of the US carbon dioxide emissions are generated by electricity production, accounting for 93% of the electricity industry emissions. Everyday there are more electronics on the market, but in the absence of a wide range of alternative energy sources, we rely heavily on coal for personal and commercial power. There are many misunderstandings about global warming. Some people think that pollution causes global warming, but global warming releases fossil fuels, coal and petroleum and releases carbon dioxide. Another misunderstanding is that nuclear power causes climate change. When used as an alternative to coal, nuclear power actually reduces carbon dioxide emissions. Some people think that global warming will become warmer. Depending on the location it actually gets cold, so the name may be misleading. Most scientists believe that global warming is an ongoing process and is caused by humans.

"History shows that all the conquistors with their weapons have targeted their downfall." While Adolf Hitler repeatedly expressed this sentiment, Hitler's desk conversation, 1941- A reference to the 1944 secret dialogue is his most definite definition of gun control perspective. The principle of controlling and regulating public access to firearms is not reserved only for the Third Reich, but the rights of the people who maintain and transport weapons have been controversial since the dawn of government organizations It is. Discussions on gun control require consideration of the risks associated with placing more guns around the children calmly and objectively. This is often an internal emotional argument that identifies ownership of freedom and guns, but what kind of freedom is it? This is not yet clear. Nina Simone once said that freedom is a life without fear, but students, parents, teachers and citizens have the right to do so. It may be distracting for brave men, women, and young people to discuss the second amendment to participate in the gun control debate. But it does not have to be so. There are many false alarms that encourage political discussions over gun control, but the law itself and its application are relatively easy to follow. The following explains the second amendment and how it supports state gun reform requirements. There are explanations about the worldwide task of implementing constitutional rights. We can not discuss it unless gun control is at the center of discussion. Fortunately, Republicans and the National Rifle Association are convenient and necessary to get the gun out of controversy. The National Rifle Association continues to contribute to Republican lawmakers' election campaign to vote for dangerous and extremely deadly guns in the market. This is an effective symbiotic relationship, Republican voters who consume Fox News panic tactics and alternative stories will continue to vote for these politicians. We can discuss whether aggressive weapons are in the hands of civilians or whether general identity surveys and waiting periods will help solve large shooting crises. However, as long as there are many people who strongly and enthusiastically claim guns, we can not make such discussions.

The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court raised a case showing that the MMR vaccine caused the Urabe mumps flu virus strain. Adverse reactions to MMR vaccines have been reported to the US and Canadian authorities as Japanese vaccines have been reported to cause meningitis. Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. - Introduction of influenza. Meningitis tetanus. There are hundreds of different infectious diseases that measles individuals can contract from others directly or indirectly through the air they breathe. For many infections, some people have to figure out ways to prevent the spread of these diseases. Therefore, the concept of immunization was born. The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court raised a case showing that the MMR vaccine caused the Urabe mumps flu virus strain. The reader believes that his article is a controversial article. Both authors agree to dismiss essential HPV vaccines, but each vaccine has its own belief. While using various methods, Allen's tone and language in his work is different from Adam's article. Still, many autistic organizations still believe in the connection. Early in March 2008, vaccine autism debaucher recurs after acknowledging paying compensation to a 9 year old Georgian family who developed symptoms of autism after receiving regular vaccination for children. did. According to officials, a pediatric vaccine given to a girl in 2000 caused the experiment to gradually become phased out and then exacerbated existing symptoms before it appeared as symptoms like autism. According to the family, the existing condition is mitochondrial disease, cell's "energy source".

Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. Many people argue that there is no relationship between disease and vaccination, others insist on the belief of Wakefield. Still, many autistic organizations still believe in the connection. Early in March 2008, vaccine autism debaucher recurs after acknowledging paying compensation to a 9 year old Georgian family who developed symptoms of autism after receiving regular vaccination for children. did. According to officials, a pediatric vaccine given to a girl in 2000 caused the experiment to gradually become phased out and then exacerbated existing symptoms before it appeared as symptoms like autism. According to the family, the existing condition is mitochondrial disease, cell's "energy source". The safety of the MMR vaccine was questioned before immunization in 1988 - the rise of autism dispute. In the 1980s, the UK court raised a case showing that the MMR vaccine caused the Urabe mumps flu virus strain. The reader believes that his article is a controversial article. Both authors agree to dismiss essential HPV vaccines, but each vaccine has its own belief. While using various methods, Allen's tone and language in his work is different from Adam's article. Vaccination - Discussion on autism came from a study by UK medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield claims to have found measles associated with the development of pediatric autism and gastrointestinal disorder, vaccination of mumps and colds and rubella (MMR). (Hansen) He announced his findings to the British Medical Journal. It caused a big controversy among many scientists, doctors and citizens of Europe. - Introduction of influenza. Meningitis tetanus. There are hundreds of different infectious diseases that measles individuals can contract from others directly or indirectly through the air they breathe. For many infections, some people have to figure out ways to prevent the spread of these diseases. Therefore, the concept of immunization was born. Discussions that are not influenced by facts can go anywhere. Those who believe that immunization causes autism can lead to the recurrence of diseases that we believe have long conquered. Those who deny evidence linking global warming to carbon emissions will not even consider adopting a gentle plan to get out of trouble. Thompson's book is an introduction to the history of public discourse, beginning with ancient Greeks, in a series of lectures at Oxford University. Exaggeration is always a characteristic of persuasion of the world. The instigator always expresses hatred to a particular group or other group. Thompson analyzed the words of Donald Trumpe in detail, and shows how his short-lived, confident and repeated claim is appealing to many voters. He also explained the feelings of the victim, for example the scream of a Halloween costume at Yale University - how do you make people feeling oppression "supposed to be oppressors"?

Nevada province is becoming a battlefield to determine the future of power generation in the United States. However this time it is not a discussion between nuclear power and Yucca Mountain. In contrast, Nevada is the focus of discussion on coal-fired power plants, and coal-fired power plants supply about half the power of the country. You need to upgrade Flash Player which will be replaced with Flash content. Please put your alternative content here. Users who do not have a Flash plugin or turn off Javascript will see this content. The content here allows you to leave untagged tags. If you wish, please include a link to avoid detection Three new factories were proposed at Yinzhou, and environmental groups said their impacts were fatal to the environment and human health. Although the coal-fired power station's proposal reappeared in the first half of this decade, as evidenced by the 59 coal-fired power plant plans canceled, abandoned or shelved last year, this trend reverses the coal Stated. They also pointed out that Mr. Harry Reid of the Senate majority vote leader was dullly opposed by a favorable position to the new coal-fired power plant. However, developers of power companies and power plants say coal is needed to brighten air conditioning neon in other areas of the rapidly growing Las Vegas and the southwestern desert. They say coal is an important part of their ability to provide cheap and reliable power plans. Environmentalists, on the other hand, state that renewable energy can meet new power needs such as Nevada's rich solar and geothermal resources, energy efficiency and so on. They also raised doubts as to whether coal can actually deliver low cost power as the price of the new power plant rises and Congress discussed potentially expensive carbon caps and taxes. At the same time, recommendations from three Nevada factories are ongoing. It is recommended to build two 1,500 MW power plants and another 750 MW power plant near Erie in Baicheng County near Mesquite in Clark County. These factories face several regulatory obstacles, including approval by the Nevada State Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Land Administration Bureau, before the construction of a new generation of coal-fired power generation began. Together they can supply electricity to about 8 million ordinary detached houses and generate more than 30 million tons of greenhouse gas carbon dioxide per year. The increase in coal-fired power generation and natural gas is equal to or greater than that. From a certain point of view, debate on train debris seems to be an argument between coal and natural gas. However, because the gas-fired power plant is also subject to some new regulations, the discussion is not that simple. Some regulations may affect coal-fired power plants that are not proportional to other power plants, but other regulations such as cooling water recovery plans may affect non-coal power plants to a greater extent . Coal-fired power plants are what we are working on. Because it is a very cheap power generation method, it is too dirty. In Ontario, the government closed the last coal-fired power plant in 2014. In 2012, there was a smoke alarm on 16th in Toronto. There has been almost nothing since the factory was closed. Amazing thing is what effect it has. However, like the United States, I heard that coal-fired power plants around the world are trying to increase production. Meat production can be combined most easily, and perhaps the most attention will be gained. But, that is indeed a third idea. My next thought is oil. I have an idea on how to make oil on the beach. But it rained in the middle of the week for several days so I can not go out and do it. I finally went to the supermarket. I went about to see what they had. There are various forms of energy at nuclear power plants. In the United States, coal, natural gas, petroleum, nuclear power are the most common energy. Three of these energy so

Discussion of abortion There are people of all kinds in the world, but we all have different opinions. This report discusses the problem of abortion. Learn about the strengths and weaknesses of this topic. Some people think abortion is wrong, and abortion is to kill innocent children. Others believe that they are not actually human until the fetus sucks the air for the first time. Many people think abortion is murder to some extent. Many people who oppose abortion are minorities. This article is about the discussion about abortion. For my personal opinion, I decided to write this. Discussion of abortion is one of the biggest arguments in the United States. Both sides raised many topics in the discussion of abortion. I got 6 points from two aspects of the question. The first thing I want to talk about is when the fetus is regarded as human life. Because professional life believes that life begins with a concept, abortion is like murder, it is an act of robbing human life. now The symmetry resulting from the analysis of the main arguments on both sides of the discussion on abortion can explain why it seems difficult to solve the discussion on abortion. Consider the following discussion of standard anti-pregnancy abortion: the fetus is a human being and living. Human beings have the right to life. Therefore, the fetus has the right to live. Of course, women have the right to control their bodies, but the right of life is beyond the rights of women who control their bodies. Therefore, abortion is wrong. Judith Thomson (1971) argues that this argument fails even if a person gives the right of life to the fetus (for discussion only). Thomson encourages you to imagine that you are connected when you are sleeping, that blood is in the blood, and that you are a famous violinist. Violinists with rare blood disorders will die if they break it. Thomson believes that you have the right to disconnect you.

Over the past 45 years the gays group has fought with the mainstream America to gain the same rights as all other Americans. In the past decade, they have fought for the right to participate in marriage. Each country can determine the law applicable to this situation. Homosexuals and other liberal faiths believe that they have the right to live in harmony, but conservatives in the United States firmly oppose this position. We will consider the parties' claims to determine which parties are making the most strong claims. In recent years, discussions on homosexual marriage have evolved from several contingent issues in several states to a national controversy. There is an objection to whether homosexuality should be allowed marriage and about subordinate themes that are consistent with gay marriage. I would like to know if homosexuality can be married, but if so, is it legal anywhere? In the US in 2009, some states such as Iowa, Vermont and Connecticut allowed gay marriage, but California, Florida, Discussion on the legalization of homosexual marriages in the United States is not only about gay couple's status. This is also about the future of American civil law. Civil law is defined by the needs and rights of citizens, gay marriage is legalized, or civil law is under the rule of religious law, gay marriage is prohibited. Homosexual marriage opponents try to provide legal and social reasons for their position. However, it always returns to religion for religious hostility and homosexuals. For Christian nationalists, legalized homosexual marriages represent that their religion fails in a struggle for defining American cultural and legal boundaries. Constitutional rights of homosexual marriage is a topic in American debate. Currently there are legitimate gay marriages in 37 states, 13 states prohibit gay marriage. Two articles "Homosexual marriage" by Carl Polit and Carl Colson "Homosexual marriage problem" provide a comparative view of the reason why homosexual marriage should be legal. . - The legalization of homosexual marriage has reached the domestic stage (Kellard) in the past decade. Naturally, some people are uncomfortable with what they are unfamiliar with, but this does not deny the group's right to deserve America's citizens. To deny the right of gay marriage is more harmful than it can be imagined by the person opposed to it.

Civil disobedience is a deliberate violation of law to promote ethical principles and change government policy. It may be limited to violations of certain laws considered inequitable, such as the civil rights movement of the United States in the 1960s. Alternatively, civil disobedience may include other law violations to raise concerns about unfairness, such as physical damage, default of payment of taxes or payment of taxes, interference with construction work and illegal invasion . People who practice all kinds of civil disobedience are willing to accept the results of their actions as a means to promote their behavior. Henry David Thoreau first described the principle of civil disobedience in the article "On Responsibility for Civil Disobedience" in 1849. He believes that when conscience contradicts the law, individuals have an obligation to promote justice by violating the law. Civil disobedience is the main strategy of women's suffrage movement, modern Gandhi's Indian independence movement, American civil rights movement, and abolition of apartheid in South Africa. Examples of recent civil disobedience include the refusal of UK public opinion polls and public opinion polls in 1990, as well as activities for some animal rights and abortion prevention activists. [1] There is always discussion on whether civil disobedience is inevitably nonviolent. The Black Law Dictionary contains nonviolence in the definition of civil disobedience. An article in the encyclopedia of Christian Bay states that civil disobedience necessitates "carefully chosen legal instrument", but I do not believe that they are necessarily non-violent. Civil disobedience and civil revolts are proved by relying on constitutional flaws, but since the rebellion is more destructive, it is justified if rebellion flaws can not prove civic rebellion Then you can not prove that civil disobedience uses power and violence and refuses to accept arrests. It is said that citizens who do not listen to avoid violence will also help to maintain social tolerance for civil disobedience. Nonviolence: The problem that is controversial in the debate about civil disobedience is nonviolence. Like publicity, nonviolence is said to reduce the negative impact of law breach. Some theorists further say, by definition, civil disobedience is nonviolent. According to Rawls, violent acts that can cause harm are incompatible with civil disobedience as a solution. Rawls said, "That's true" Any interference with others' civil liberties tends to obscure the civil disobedience of their behavior (Rolls 1971, 366). Historically, the immigration controversy brought civic disobedience. Disobedience of the citizen cuts both directions. Most recently in Proposal No. 187 and 2006, many service providers are more aware of citizens' failure to comply with the law requiring them to turn someone into an immigrant or refuse to provide a service We supported supporting submission. Cardinal Mahoney encouraged Catholics to take such a position. Then some people take different positions. They believed that borders protection failed, so they monitored the border between Mexico and the United States. They call themselves "militia". Faith is very strong to immigration and immigration problems Investigated the disobedience of the citizens of Sophocles' Antigone, the letter from the King of Birmingham Prison, and the refusal to criticize Plato's citizens, and created important and widely debated items by many famous wisdom scholars. The problem shows many examples of civil disobedience. Disobedience of citizens is also noticed in Sophocles' Antigone, King letter, Birmingham 's prison letter, as well as rhetorical analysis of Plato' s "Birmingham Prison Letter". Dr. Martin Luther King at Birmingham Prison answered an article by the eight clerics who explained the racial injustice of Birmingham and the reasons of Kim's organization protesting civil rights, introduced himself, stated at the beginning of th

The resumption of discussion on the recovery of Buffalo's bison has been ongoing for the past two decades. Indeed, tribes of Native Americans gathered and a tribal bison cooperative (ITBC) was formed, and Bison returned to the plains of the Midwestern United States. Bison has a close relationship with the native American tradition and ritual. The importance of bison in culture makes bison an important issue in the protection of wildlife. In the restoration of Buffalo, East Shoshone and North Allahpah are not just filling the empty environmental niche. Boy-Zhan Bi-Den (Buffalo Return) can also improve the tribal members' lives. In poor, poor healthy, traumatized land, by restoring the environment, it helps to restore the community and restore its heritage. "Changing the connection with this animal is a wonderful cultural activity, culture, spirit, and ecology." The mighty Buffalo (or Bison) in North America had planned millions in North America until it was nearly extinct by white settlers. There are currently about 500,000 buffaloes for repair work, but most of them are mated with cattle and are stored in commercial livestock pens. The number of aseptic and sick buffalo is only about 5,000 people. Bison is very suitable for changes in the temperature of Great Plains field. In winter, its strong neck allows them to cross the dense snow of multiple feet to reach the lower lawn. The flock leader also uses their huge neck muscles and low heads as an opportunity to break through the snowy roads as the calves and the old man can follow Asiniboin and Siou in Fort Peck Reserve are promising to restore the Yellowstone Buffalo and actively establish quarantine facilities and relocation facilities in their lands. Defenders will restore these bisons and support the huge efforts to reduce unnecessary massacres. Floyd Azure, chairman of Peckborg Tribe, says: The farmer of Morsey is about Buffalo. Let's create a direct record to avoid the fact that it seems to be talking about American Bison. A unique new Los Altos restaurant is the result of family commitment to Buffalo, a huge and very important livestock of many parts of the world, especially Africa and Southeast Asia. Yulia Mosie and her husband's cal is from Egypt, buffalo is common. A couple of years ago, this couple was fascinated by the flavor and health benefits of Buffalo dairy products and created the first big buffalo herd in the United States. Beginning with 7 cows pregnant in 2013, there are 400 such animals outside Sacramento on the farm of Wilton, California.

Discussing with nature Discussion with nature is a question of the extent of the impact of environment and genetics on behavior and development. In this issue, nature can be defined as behavior caused by heredity. This means that the behavior is based on the individual's genetic makeup and is the effect of personal growth and development throughout life. On the other hand, cultivation is the cause of environmental behavior. This means that it affects parents, siblings, families, friends, and all other experiences facing individuals. The argument between nature and cultivation is about scientific, cultural and philosophical arguments about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are mainly caused by nature and cultivation. In this discussion, nature is often defined as genetic or hormone-based behavior and cultivation is most often defined as environment and experience. Discussions between nature and cultivation are in progress. Contemporary discussion is not influenced by the early environment and development, but mainly on the influence of genes on human personality. Along with changes in cultural practices, people are increasingly deepening their understanding of this argument. For example, in the 1960 's, psychologists and popular culture were generally strongly influenced by behavioral theory. This theory leads to a broad belief that human nature is mainly influenced by experience and training. In the context of nature and cultivation controversy, "nature" refers to the impact of biological / genetic susceptibility on human characteristics, and nurturing refers to the effects of learning and other environments. Discussions continue between scholars and non-experts as to whether people's strengths and weaknesses are natural or cultivated. This argument has great social significance, especially with regard to the ability to be considered for determining people's learning / intellectual abilities (Lynch, 2016). Nature has a single meaning, but cultivation is a broader term that refers to culture, nutrition and teaching. What is the point? The difference between simple essence, the development of paper and nature, and the development of controversial papers is that, in other cases, students must observe certain points. In the first case, you need a detailed description of the selected topic without forcing the intended audience to the existing position. If you have questions about how to write academic papers, professional writers and editors are available online 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In this article, please see the top-level nature and ideas for the development of the paper. If you like specific ideas, our company's writers will do your thesses as well

Pregnancy abortion was always confusing and controversial debate. There are many articles and philosophers who describe strong bias of abortion. Some people think that abortion is morally unacceptable and can not be accepted under any circumstances. Instead, others believe that women should have the right to choose whether they will continue to become pregnant. In "abortion", Judith Jarvis Thomson used reality analogy to explain her important argument, even though it is thought that not only mother and fetus but also fetus is from the moment of pregnancy I will. In the era of political polarization, almost all topics seem to be able to lead to controversy and controversy. Pregnancy abortion is no exception. When discussing abortion, people tend to take one of two perspectives. People who support life think that women should not be able to do abortion because they constitute homicide. Individuals who support the choice believe that women with fetuses should be given the right to decide whether to give birth to maturity or to stop. Abortion is a controversial topic; this discussion evokes strong emotions from both sides. Abortion is a pretty serious and dry topic, you are a pro life or a pro choise. People who support their lives are those who believe abortion is morally and morally wrong. Figure 1. American Amnesty International In today's society in 2013, there are an estimated 6 million people worldwide, and they are expanding every day. In today's economy, most civilians are in poverty and are slowly increasing; in fact, people now feel that it is difficult to support themselves. The argument of abortion is a controversy on the moral, legal and religious status of abortion. The parties involved in the discussion are self-describing "choice to support" and "support life" movements. "Pro Selection" highlights the rights of women to decide whether to quit pregnancy or not. "Pro Life" emphasizes embryo or fetus' rights to give birth and childbirth. These two terms are considered to be loaded in mainstream media and terms such as "right to abortion" and "prohibition of abortion" are often preferred. Each campaign has various results, affecting public opinion and trying to obtain legal support for that position. A few anti-abortion supporters use violence such as homicide and arson.

To say the least, the discussion of homosexual marriage is complicated. Bitterness, feelings and controversy are just a few words that can be used to explain it. In 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriage; since then 12 provinces have approved gay marriage (Shapiro). Several states have decided to legalize homosexual marriages, but other states still insist on banning their constitutional amendment. Determining whether to allow a gay couples to marry will motivate both parties in the matter. Discussion of same sex marriage Gay marriage is a very controversial topic based on marriage. Politics, government, constitutional freedom and equality played a role in gay marriage debate. - Initially, after choosing my theme, I was planning to pay attention to the Muslim marriage tradition - but the more I study, the more corruption appears in the sacrament It was. I do not know all of you, but I think it is more interesting to controversial. I would like to talk in front of this statement, but many of the customs I'm about to talk about are widely accepted in the Middle East - but this does not justify them. Abstract: Some gay marriage activists may want to exclude certain moral and religious views from the same-sex marriage debate. However, there is evidence that religious and moral arguments are often used to support gay marriages. All believers, or those who do not have any faith, should freely participate in marriage discussions and present a moral perspective on these issues. Progress of gay marriage debate has renewed attention to the status of religion and morality in shaping the definition of the Marriage Law. For example, after the voter passed the California State Marriage Amendment No. 8, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was severely criticized and was based on the support of this measure. Well, in a federal lawsuit contesting the proposal of No. 8, one problem is whether the evidence of religious support for Proposition 8 will somehow doubt this measure.