The Animal Rights Debate

The back of the eyes covered with sugar is dark and quiet, and you are everything. You complained about seeking help by complaining, but no one seemed to hear your voice. You think that your family made you abandon you and sit alone in a narrow cage. There is no place to use the bathroom other than where you stand. The bad smell of your feces is getting worse every second. The only food they will leave for you, you will eat on the first day. The only thing that keeps you alive is your willingness to eat and drink your waste desperately and survive.

Animal crusade for animals released from Experimental Cage by Christine Jackson and the recent animal rights debate by Leland C. Clark, Jr "The threat of animal rights movement to endanger scientists" Scientist, September 3, 1990, page 11), indicating that the research community needs new correspondence. In the past, animal rights spokesmen were mocking the same lies, distortions, and semi-truth collections, and the research community refuted these separately. If the previous one proves to be fake, the animal rights group will add a new accusation. Therefore, most researchers' efforts are to counter the myriad new mistakes.

There was controversy between animal rights claimants and scientists as to whether animals were used correctly in experimental studies. In addition, the use of animals for such studies can find that the way to cure this disease remains controversial. In my opinion, animals can be used for experimental studies if there is no other choice, and if this is useful for science. Animal rights activists claim that humans and animals are equal, but they should be treated equally, but I do not think that people and animals look equally so animal death is a human death It is not the same as. For this reason, if animals died in science to save lives, promote scientific progress, and generally can benefit human beings, they may be considered morally somewhat moral.

There is a fundamental difference between the view of welfare of animals and the philosophy of rights of animals. Further promoting the discussion, particularly in the past 30 years, is the emergence of small but strong animal rights groups, they believe that humans and animals are essentially equal and condemn the use of any animal . Human interests Animal welfare philosophy fundamentally differs from animal rights philosophy because it supports the use of animals responsibly to meet specific human needs. These include dating and exercise, and the use of living for food, clothing, medical research. Animal welfare is to ensure that all animals used by humans meet basic needs such as food, housing and health, and do not suffer unnecessary suffering to meet human needs.