The Higher Education Debate

Higher education debate is the price of higher education being discussed among American politicians. Legislators are worried about the increase in the cost of acquiring the degree of the university and the reduction of the debt burden of the student. Therefore, these issues are topics of the presidential campaign campaign. The pressure to pay tuition is not only from the government but also from the family, I think they are willing to pay high tuition fees.

The first link between current economic crisis analysis and higher education debate includes public / private aspects. The problem of sustainability of higher education is increasingly constrained by a larger economic debate about fiscal policy. The main driving force of the neoliberal reaction to the crisis of the 1970s was to reduce the role of states and taxation to release the market force for better resource allocation. However, the sustainability of such a system is theoretically controversial, as automatic reversal of long-term inequality is questioned by the long-term wealth turmoil brought about by economic growth ( Krugman, 2008; Piketty, 2014; Stiglitz). , 2012), especially after 2008

The second important aspect of economic and higher education debate is inequality. The recession can be regarded as an unequal crisis that is caused by increased tensions between re-establishment and redistribution of unconditional tax increases and is obscured by the increase in private debt. In a sense, higher education can be considered creator and recipient of these inequities. Social inequality tends to be repeated in schools, and at the higher education level a number of inequalities are explained (Bourdieu and Passeron, 1964). This is interpreted differently. For cost-sharing supporters, this means that costs are not liable inequitably (free Higher Education systems are not equal). More than anything, fees do not increase inequality as graduates gain more income and rush into high income groups.

The passage of the Higher Education Act of 1965 greatly increased federal investment in higher education and provided subsidies and loans to public and private university students. In 1971, the Senate Educational Subcommittee of the United States discussed the bill proposed by Senator Claiborne Pell and declared that the Federal government's policy of "allowing all young people's rights to advance regardless of the family's financial condition" It was established. The Truman Committee acknowledged that the tuition fee of the university hindered doubling the number of university students in 1947 (from 3 million in 1947 to 6 million in 1960). . The committee is taking measures to establish a more affordable higher education institution but most importantly it is a community college of that country - Senator Pell and his colleagues also recognize that university compensation subsidies are also important Believe that