Effects of Television Violence on Children and Teenagers
[2023-04-06 09:42:13]
Does violence on television have a bad influence on children and adolescents? Violent events on TV are surprisingly harmful. TV violence does not worry children and adolescents, loses binding power, reduces sensitivity, can cause violence and aggression.
Due to TV violence, children and young people are less concerned, lose their binding power and are not sensitive. British psychologist William Berson discovered in a study of the relationship between violence and television and 1,565 teenage boys in six years whenever a child met someone on television When they were shot or killed , They have less relationship with others (Kinnear 26). William Belson also discovered that whenever a child saw such violence on television, he lost the detention to others (Kinnear 26). In addition to William Belson's research, research by many scientists and physicians shows that by watching violence on television viewers will not become more sensitive to suffering by others (Mudore 1).
In addition, television violence leads to child aggression. Many people think that children watching violent TV programs are more aggressive than children who do not see violent TV programs (Kinnear 23). According to many studies and reports, violence against television can cause aggressive behavior to children (Langone 50). In addition, when television was first introduced to the community of children, researchers observed increased physical and linguistic attacks of these children (Langone 51). The more violence the TV watches the TV, the stronger the child's aggression ("Children" 1).
Television violence is also the cause of violence and aggressive behavior of teenage boys. According to evidence from research by Turner, Hesse, and Peterson-Lewis, it can be concluded that the aggressiveness of boys watching television violence is growing over time (Hoff 1). In addition to this study, Dr. William A. Belson also rated 1,500 boys from 13 to 16 years of age. He thought that the boy exposed to the TV drama was more likely to act violently than other boys (Langone 51). In Belson's study, the influence of each violent act on television was found to be collective, and over the course of time, Belson got into many radical actions such as graffiti painting, window splitting, aggressive play, I found that boys participated. Curse and threaten other boys. Violence (Kinnear 26)
All these studies on violence and television caused the problem that TV could potentially cause an attack. Hundreds of studies of the effects of television violence on children and adolescents have found that they may be "vaccinated" by violent acts of terrorism. Because they saw so much violence on television, it no longer affected them. This desensitization is described by Thomas et al. (1977), which is an emphasis. So far, all the evidence reflects the negative perception of television. However, the opponents believe that people will not actively take action by television violence. Aggression is a natural instinctive urge that can lead to demanding aggressive behavior. Early pioneers of Freud's and other psychoanalysis theories argue that aggression is an instinctive force that leads to human aggression behavior.
Does violence on television have a bad influence on children and adolescents? Violent events on TV are surprisingly harmful. Children and young people are less concerned with television violence, they lose binding power, become insensitive, may cause violence and aggression. Due to TV violence, children and young people are less concerned, lose their binding power and are not sensitive. British psychologist William Berson said that whenever a child was found and killed by discovery in a study of relations between violence and television and 1,565 teenage boys in six years whenever a child met someone on television, they There is less relation with other people (Kinnear 26). William Belson also discovered that whenever a child saw such violence on television, he lost the deten