The influence of violence on television and television on children and youth Violence against television adversely affects children and adolescents. Violent events on TV are surprisingly harmful. Children and young people are less concerned about TV violence, they lose control, become insensitive, can lead to violence and aggression. Due to television violence, children and adolescents are less concerned, lose deterrence, and are not sensitive.
Can all the studies on violence and television doubt how television is likely to cause aggression? Hundreds of studies on the effects of TV violence on children and adolescents have found that they may be "vaccinated" by violent acts of terrorism. They no longer had an impact on them as they saw so much violence on television. Thomas et al. (1977) highlight this desensitization effect. So far, all the evidence reflects the negative perception of television. However, the opponents believe that people will not actively take action by television violence. Aggression is a natural instinctive urge that can lead to demanding aggressive behavior. Early pioneers of Freud's and other psychoanalysis theories argue that aggression is an instinctive force that leads to human aggression behavior.
Does violence on television have a bad influence on children and adolescents? Violent events on TV are surprisingly harmful. Children and young people are less concerned about TV violence, they lose control, become insensitive, can lead to violence and aggression. Due to television violence, children and adolescents are less concerned, lose deterrence, and are not sensitive. British psychologist William Belson looked at the relationship between violence and television and 1,565 teenage boys in six years each time a child met someone on television. When they are shot or killed, they have less relationship with others (Kinnear 26). William Belson also discovered that whenever a child saw such violence on television, he lost the detention against others (Kinnear 26)