Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
[2023-01-22 15:28:18]
On June 15, 2012, Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary at the time, announced a memorandum entitled "Exercise of Discretionary Power of Prosecutor as Child to the United States". A non-parliament approved administrative program that allows certain people to come to the United States as a teenager and to meet specific criteria, including the lack of existing legal immigration qualifications, requires consideration of two-year postponement procedures, It is eligible to renew and obtain permission to work. This program is known as a child's immigration extension measure (DACA).
The Obama Administration chose to deploy DACA through the Memorandum of Understanding - Congress negatively denied such a plan in normal legislative proceedings. Since its founding, the constitutionality of this behavior has been widely questioned
DACA's criteria are too wide, so it's not just children. According to the classification criteria prescribed in the Memorandum of Understanding on 15th June 2012, if they came to the United States before their 16th birthday they can apply for prolongation, they are under 31 years old, I live in the United States since 15th month. At the school, I got a general educational development (GED) certificate, or a veteran of the US Coast Guard or the military who graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from a high school. If they are convicted of a felony or minor misdemeanor, they are not eligible, but even if they are condemned up to two other misdemeanors, they are considered eligible.
On September 4, 2017, the Minister of Justice sent a letter to the ministry, and as the Congress repeatedly refused, DACA went without "proper legal authority" and without a fixed cancellation date "by the former government through administrative measures" It clearly made a legal decision. This bill is an administrative violation of the Constitution for exercising power, "DACA states" There are legal and constitutional defects of court approval similar to DAPA. " Therefore, potentially pending litigation could produce similar results to DACA. "
According to this analysis, the president is facing a serious choice: not doing anything, and the court will immediately ban the whole DACA program in a destructive manner or phased out the plan in an orderly manner To admit that. On September 5, 2017, Duke, Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Department, (1) abolish the memorandum that the DACA was established in June 2012, and (2) plan to phased out the DACA Announced that it will formulate. As a result of this step-by-step approach, the Department of Homeland Security provides a limited window that determines the relevant applications for employment permits that meet specific requirements for DACA and the following specified parameters I guess.
On 9th January, the District Court for the Northern California District Court ruled that the Trump regime decided to end the child's immigration extension measures (DACA) program. DACA postpones prosecution and attempts to put illegally imported children into the children, and approximately 800,000 people are called "dreamers". It does not provide a means of citizenship but allows such an authorized position and such a dreamer frequently gets a driver's license and serves in our army and gives them taxable credentials To be paid. You can also get pre-approval to leave Japan temporarily and return home.
Currently, more than 750,000 young undocumented immigrants in the United States have applied for a child's immigration extension measure (DACA). Through DACA, these youngsters, known as dreamers, have the ability to look for employment and educational opportunities and become an integral part of the nation's community. In addition to personal expenses, the abolition of DACA can cause devastating economic consequences in our country. Dreamers are the source of corporate talent and their culture enriches our community. Recent DACA recipient survey by United We Dream,