Epicurean and his nearest companion have a wide range of literary works, and at least 42 different Epicurean works are widely distributed (including 37 extensive nature, some of which survived) And 12 Metrodolls and four books. Polyanus' book. It is said that the original epicurus is filled with 300 volumes that do not match any other ancient philosopher. Epicuras died in 270 BC. Painful urinary tract obstruction and accompanying dysentery infection. In the last few hours of his life, he wrote an emotional letter to Idomeneus, where he evaluated the pleasure of remembering his friendship with him before his painful suffering . When he entered a warm bronze bath and asked for wine, he encountered his ending, swallowed a drink, then urged believers to remember their doctrine with the last breath. My friend, the truth that I teach will be acquired soon. " Epicuras set up epicureanism. Epicurus is based on his philosophy of hedonism - the only benefit in life is happiness. However, Epicuras teaches that not all fun is good. Extreme happiness can lead to pain, so the only benefit is peace and calm happiness. Epicuras said that the highest pleasure is two freedom from physical health and peace of mind, pain. Skepticism is a school of philosophy founded by Pils of Ellis, as well as the prosperity of Stow's philosophy and epicureanism. Pyrrho taught us not to know anything. He said that our senses deceive us do not have the exact way to understand things. Therefore, all requirements on knowledge are wrong. We do not know anything, so in this viewpoint we should be indifferent to everything and should not make any judgment.

Epicurus (341-270 BC) established one of the major philosophies of ancient Greece and helped lay the foundations of modern scientific knowledge and secular individualism. Many aspects of their ideas are still highly relevant in the 23 th century, after they were called "garden" at the school in Athens. Epicurian philosophy emphasizes the culture of moderation and friendship's desire and combines physics-based ethical hedonism with reasonable atomic material. His view of the world is an optimistic point of view, emphasizing the philosophy that can free people from the fear of death and supernatural within it, and how to find happiness in almost all situations You can teach us. He practiced insight into human psychology, as well as his science friendly view of the world, Epicurean has intellectual development of Western civilization into important contemporary significance and important role. Epicurus philosophy of Epicurus and the site will introduce Epicurean philosophy to anyone seeking serious students, convenience and exciting ideas, which is a contemporary version of the garden, will help people who are interested will gather together. Please click the link below to learn more about their philosophy of Epicurus! Interested in discussing hedonism and related topics that provide you epicurean philosophy list (EPL) which is a dedicated email list for your hedonistic private ads, epicurus.net very proud If you think These and other gourmet lists can also be used to understand the epicros society and educational activities, including recent suggestions for the formation of international organizations of Epicurus. Sites and epicurean websites listed on the online resources page occasionally mention these activities He is too young, "too early or too late because there is no age for the health of the soul, that everyone should not seek wisdom slowly. I do not seek wisdom in his old days. And it has not come yet to learn the philosophical season, or it is repeated many times, whether happiness season is now gone. Because of that, elderly people and young people are elegant and young to seek wisdom, because the former probably is increasing with his past, age, and the latter for his young age, He is not afraid of the future. If there is, since we have it all, we need to bring our own use to happiness, if not, all of our actions will realize it . "- Epicurus, a letter to Menoeceus This is far from the philosophy of Epicurus. Hedonism promotes search for happiness, but fun does not seek physical pleasure, but the pleasure of the soul, Atalaxia, no interference is the most important, Epicros' efforts are to prevent external interference To get rid of. Due to the nature of the problem, especially as the atomic law of the world's most important ancient materials, epicros, exercise, sensation and perception, abundant writing and education in particular. Although he did not deny the existence of God, he rejects myth but gives them power, they actively hinder the concept of human life. Material historical view Karl Marx wrote an accidental PhD dissertation not found in Epicurus and Democritus Epicurus philosophy of Epicurus and the site will introduce Epicurean philosophy to anyone seeking serious students, convenience and exciting ideas, which is a contemporary version of the garden, will help people who are interested will gather together. Please click the link below to learn more about their philosophy of Epicurus! These and other gourmet lists can also be used to understand the epicros society and educational activities, including recent suggestions for the formation of international organizations of Epicurus. Sites and epicurean websites listed on the online resources page occasionally mention these activities As the philosopher of many former Socrates such as Epicurus which is matter of matter called atomic and sky composition called the universe. Luke Rai says, "Things can not be created from scratch, things

Overview 2-5, LS § 4 "Principle of protection" In these paragraphs, what are the three principles claimed by Epicura and Lucretius? (I) Things are not because there is nothing, nothing. (Ii) Things are not changed to things, things are not literally eliminated. (Iii) the whole will continue to be the same and still the same; this whole will not change, and external things can not be introduced to change it. Clearly, things do not appear in anything, each comes from a specific thing - tree nuts, nuts, fruits, birds in eggs, eggs in birds. Like many former Socratic philosophers, Epicuras believes that the universe consists of materials called atoms and voids. The focussed epiculus, Lucretius, clarifies the naturalism philosophy of Epicurean through teaching of maxim, "I can not be created because nothing is things, things will degrade to nothing at all I can not do it. " God does not interfere with human life This is eternal and death is nothing but the collapse of the assembly of atoms. It is important to emphasize that the overall structure of epicureanism is integrated and intended to fulfill its main ethical goals. Epicurean's naturalistic scientific theory depends on his understanding of happiness, that is, acquisition of happiness, correct understanding According to Aristotle (Physics 1.4), a natural philosopher. Lucretius emphasized the importance of this idea to his master Epicurus. He established his physics based on this same principle (according to Diogenes Laertius 10.24.38). But this doctrine of natural philosophy is also a methodological principle of philosophical reasoning. This is because the principles of physical production are transformed into cognitive production for ease of occurring in these problems. Consequently, substantive conclusions can not be rationally endorsed unless substantive discussions are invoked within its support, as problems must be brought about from the material world. Ancient Greek nuclear scientists such as Leucippus, Democritus, Epicurus foresaw later materialist. The Latin poetry of Lucretius De Rerum Natura (99 BC - 55 BC) reflects the mechanical philosophy of Democritus and Epicurus. According to this view, everything that exists is all material and ineffective, and all phenomena are generated by different movements and aggregates of basic substance particles called "atoms" (which means literally "indivisible") . De Rerum Natura provides a dynamic explanation of phenomena such as erosion, evaporation, wind, sound, etc. For the first time in Lucretius's work, the famous principle of "You can not touch the body, but the body will touch" appears. However, Democritus and Epicurus did not adhere to the monostonic ontology. Because they argued the ontological separation of matter and space, that is, space is the "other" of existence and the definition of "materialism" is more than this range is wider .

Epicuras started living on a small island in Samos, Aegean Sea. Born in February 341 BC, he was the second of the two poor pastors who insulted the civilians of Athens who settled in the territory of the four brothers, Greece. Epicurus' childhood may have made him angry, but his philosophy made him feel like he had spent his entire life in the magnificent palace of Alexander the Great. The greatest focus of epiculus is the greatest pleasure. According to him, it is only accomplished by removing all sufferings. Epicurian's philosophy was detailed in the long poems of Luktis (Roman philosopher of the 1st century BC), so epiculus (died in 270 BC) easily became the most influential Greek language It was. Materialist. The difference between him and Democritus is that he assumes absolute up and down direction in the universe. So all atoms follow a nearly parallel path. To explain the influence between each other, he then thought that the atom was the theory used to explain the coincidence rotation - free will -. Therefore, Epicuria's materialism is different from Democritus's uncertainty. Epicurian's philosophy includes an important moral part, a self-interested hedonism that enlightened. But his morality is not materialistic of derogatory words. The materialistic atomism proposed by Leucippus was uncertain, but it was later developed in a decisive way by Democritus. After that (the 4th century BC), the original atomic theory was once again regarded as uncertainty by Epicurus. He confirmed that the reality consists of infinitely indivisible, invariant particles or atoms (meaning atoms, "impossible to cut"), but he gives the weights of the atoms, and Leucippus' In order that they are characterized "image", "order" and "position" in the universe. In addition, they create the whole through the inherent motion in the vacuum, creating a diverse presence. Their movement was influenced by the punctuation (Lucretius named it as clinamen), depending on opportunities. These ideas led our understanding of traditional physics until the atomic nature was discovered in the 20th century.

The aim of this task is to create research papers on philosophy, and explain how it works in ancient Greece. I have to explain the Iberian philosopher I appointed and I have to discuss his view on the government and his teachings to the ancient Greeks. The important question is to write an organized article that contains multiple sources accurately. I need to get two physical sources and at least one source from the internet. In each reference, I must interpret or interpret the bibliography and show clarity. In Greek Athens, one of the famous philosophers of 200 BC epicurus, there is a big question that people can not answer, "How do you get happiness", then Epicurus will ask everyone in Athens from time to time . First of all, some people said they would have sex with six virgins, but in epic they use "human relations" to define it as a goal of happiness. Epicuras is looking at it from another perspective Many people have a very nervous life relationship. Aristotle and epiculus seem to have the same ultimate goal, but there are different ways to achieve the goal. They believe that everyone's actions are directed to human prosperity and happiness, but Epicurean also exchanges happiness and happiness. They achieved their goals in different ways, and in this respect they are very different. Epicurus and Aristotle may agree with the problem, but when it becomes the universe, they are dotted in the sky or sky space. They have many different ideas to separate them, but they end up in good faith for human beings. For example, epicros is misunderstood and Aristotle is well known, so it is easy to understand in most cases why so many people reject hedonistic philosophy. Epicuras established epicurenism. Epicurus is based on his hedonistic philosophy - the only benefit in life is happiness. However, Epicuras teaches that not all fun is good. Extreme happiness can lead to pain, so the only benefit is peace and calm happiness. Epicuras said that the highest pleasure is two freedom from physical health and peace of mind, pain. Skepticism is a philosophy school founded by Ellis Pillow, as well as the prosperity of Stow's philosophy and epicureanism. Pyrrho taught us not to know anything. He said that our sense deceives us and does not have the exact way to understand things. Therefore, all requirements on knowledge are wrong. We do not know anything, so in this way we should treat everything indifferently and not make judgments.

Many people are afraid of death, but philosophers such as Socrates and Epyclus will argue that there is no reason to worry about death. Socrates believes that death is the blessing you desire, if death is nothing but relocation of the soul, and Epicurus believes that people should not worry about death. Bad epiculus believes that death itself is completely perceptual lacking, and there is no pleasure or pain. As Socrates does not give the rationale of death as a blessing, and Epicurus' s assertion is convincing, I agree with Epicurus. Both Socrates and Epicura discussed the concept of death, and both philosophers thought they should not be afraid of death. Socrates believes that the world after death and death are eternal sleep. Epicurus is thought based on the fact that you should not be afraid of the fact that it does not cause pain. In this article, I will study the view on the death of Epicura and Socrates and discuss why Socrates' perception of death is more rational than Epicurean. If we start with Socrates and his concepts of life after death, you can see that he implies that death brings the soul to a better place. In the last speech of Socrates that he condemns the death penalty, he says, "Whether death is in the empty state or in a completely unconscious state, or as people say, moves from this world to another world" (Plato) Page 8) Comparing the two philosophers, it is clear that the view of Socrates' death is more reliable than epicurus. In the opinion of Socrates' death, there are two possible outcomes whether it is eternal sleep or the afterlife. Socrates provided a possible purpose after death and the definition of epiculus was confusing and raised several questions such as his classification of happiness and justice. Like most philosophers, Socrates' opinion is not ashamed of criticism. Most of the critics on his work are questioning whether this idea exists in later generations. It is easy to reduce this description, as Socrates has never really understood his view on future generations and he himself thought of the possibility of death without a subsequent generation. In this regard, Socrates believes that if there is no further generation, it will be in nothing condition and will be in an eternal sleeping state. Very fun In contrast, the refutation of Epicuras against his critics is less clear than Socrates. The view of death of epiculus caused confusion in the sense of happiness and justice. In his career, he once said: "If you do not have a wise, glorious, fair life, you can not live a happy life. Lulu, page 26. Therefore, Epicuras defines justice as the happiness of most people, because he does not respond to justice, happiness, honor, and wisdom, most people respond to these same convictions, they are all the same It is because it makes a hypothesis that it is. The individual has the same feeling

Death and people's perception of it are an important part of many philosophies. It can be said that the problem surrounding the life after death and death constitutes the basis of many philosophical concepts. For some philosophers, not only is the concept of death important itself, but also how people perceive it and why they see it in their way. Epicuras claims that the soul is fatal. This is an excellent explanation as to why we should not be afraid of death. To understand the philosophy of fear against Epicurus 'death, we must first understand Epicurus' cosmology, and why he believes that the soul is a human. Epicuras is an ancient Greek philosopher and founder of a philosopher known as Epicurean. For epicurus, the aim of philosophy is to realize a happy and calm life characterized by fearlessness - peace, liberation from fear, painless - painless. Epicuras believed that atom and taught humans that they can not control their destiny. He also refused to believe in God and taught the universe that it is infinite without purpose. He often said that the fear of death is one of the main causes of human anxiety and often leads to despair. Epicurus preaching death is an unavoidable reality, it is also the end of the body of the soul. It is believed that Epicuras wrote 300 works, but his work survived almost. Death has attacked many of our fears and sufferings and some philosophers believe that believing in immortality is a very needed resource to deal with this fear. But Epicuras believes in the famous fear of death is irrational for two main reasons. 1) Death is like extinction of consciousness, we do not know our condition. Death is not "); 2) Do not worry about the time after death (Rist, 1972), just as it is not worrying about the time to be born

The greatest fear of mankind is death. According to Epicurus, the soul is a material article. The body of the soul is no other part of the body. Because it is also part of the body. If a person agrees with the epiculus, there is a reason to believe that when the body of someone dies, the soul will die. Epicuras suggests that there is no reason for people to fear death. He says that people are afraid, "I expect some eternal pain, as happened in the myths, or they death as if they were something that directly affected them Fear of the loss of the emotions themselves caused by themselves. Epicuras was one of the major philosophers of the Hellenistic era in the 3 rd century BC Azaxanda the Great died in 323 B.C. (And Aristotle in 322 BC). Epicuras developed self-evident metaphysical metaphysics, empiricism epistemology and hedonistic ethics. Epicuras teaches that the basic constituent elements of the world are atoms, uncleavable substances, flying in the air, and he is trying to explain all natural phenomena in atomic terms. Epicurus rejected the existence of platonic form and invisible soul and said that God would not affect our lives. Epicurus also believes that doubt is unacceptable and we can rely on feeling to understand the world. He teaches that all actions must be happy for themselves (considered as tranquility). It can be achieved by limiting my desire and eliminating God and fear of death. Epicuras is the founder of philosophical thought called epicurenism. Humans need to live a happy and peaceful life, which is why Epicurean can develop his philosophy. According to Epicurus, in order to live a happy life for people, they should eliminate fear and experience any aspect of suffering. According to him, evil brings pain, good will bring happiness (Keefe, 2010). Epicurus further states that death means personal soul and the end of the body, so you do not need to worry about it. He further pointed out that there is no life after death, and if dead gods can not punish humans. One of the fundamental beliefs of epiculus is that death need not worry you. According to Epicurus, this is the key to finding personal happiness, along with the other three main beliefs. Epicuras believes that death is only the end of existence. It is only the end of a sensory experience, so there is nothing to see. Once you die you will not notice the surroundings of yourself and you will lose your life. It is based on this point of view to explore the idea that Epicurus is actually nothing dead. In the letter to Menous, Epicuras explains as follows. "The fact that death is unrelated to us makes the death of life a matter of contentment by eliminating the desire for eternal life, not by increasing infinite time ... ... So, Death, the most frightening things are bad, we have nothing; When we exist, there is no death, when death exists, we do not exist

Visitors: Although God wants to prevent evil, can not you? Then he is helpless. He's okay, is not it intended? Then he is evil. Is he capable and pleased? Then, where does evil come from? Can not he help? So why are you calling him God? "Why do not we talk about the Old Testament? Will not you explain all the stories of the Old Testament to me? Wait a moment, it's rape, homicide, slavery, homosexuals and There are a lot of people killing the gods, we should not rape or possess 10 slave slaves, he will be depressed Epicurus said that God hopes to prevent evil and can not do it or can not do it, or does not want it, or does not want it, or is pleased or not pleased, or is willing to delight. If he is willing and helpless, he is weak and it does not match God's personality. If he is competent and reluctant, he is malicious and does not adapt to God's personality. If he is glad and can not do it, he is not a god at all because he is a vicious and weak person. If he wants to fit God alone and is capable, what sources are evil? Why did not he stop them? (Lactantius, de Ira Dei (313 AD); Epicurus's first evil problem version formula Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. In his dialogue on nature's religion (1779), David Hume cited Epicurus to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but is helpless And is he helpless, does he have both abilities and intentions then is it evil? Can neither he nor help, then why is he calling him God? , The God of a personal Christian is considered to be a logically contradictory quality These atheists are proposing deductive arguments against the existence of God God is the integrity of the creator We insist on incompatibility between specific features such as status, invariance, omniscience, totipotency, omni-directionality, transcendence, personality etc. Personal existence), justice, justice, compassion

Humans often have prejudices and fears about the concept of abstract death. Two Greek philosophers Epicloth and Epitetus do not have to worry, proving that death is negligible takes a very different approach. Epicurus considers death to be the clear purpose of our existence and Epitectus insists it is what we can not control. Both understand the nature of death and try to reach asymptomatic or gentle attitude. But Epicurus and Epicteus did not mention the true emotional nature of death and its impact on the human mind. "Death of Ivan Ilyich" is mainly meditation on the nature of death. For Heidegger, death focuses on our lives. As an example, Leo Tolstoy's quote "Ideal death of Ise Ii", Heidegger believes that most people spend their lives while avoiding reality - the possibility to end every possibility - a person Death of. Heidegger believes that by predicting death we can guarantee the true way we exist As an integral part of human life and inevitable death, it is a reflection thinker, sage, artist and even the general people, the source of imagination and inspiration. Questions about the nature of death and the matter after death have been answered in various forms and forms through religion, philosophy, tradition. These answers and the concepts of death and the reflection on reality, imagination and emotion shaping attitude, and these attitudes from the era of near death, to funerals, burials and lawyers, to the symbols of rituals related to death and typical behavior It is reflected. In short, these attitudes are shaping our own history (1) These thoughts, imagination, actions, ceremonies, Through theology in myriad ways to explain the nature of death, to history, the living after death in the presence of God directly from various myths and complete annihilation, ... or pain. Several groups allow their deceased "to" resolve their bad things and ultimately reach heaven. Others imagine that life after death is full of infinite rich life in the life on Earth. Some teach the deceased to be rewarded for being a god and others teach the reincarnation of the earth based on past actions.

My theme focuses on my argument about Rosenbaum's defense of food perspective, Rupper's criticism of this perspective, and who is taking a stronger stand on this issue. We will do this by explaining these two parameters in detail. When Rober objected to it, Rosenbaum defended the eating opinion. Rosenbaum defended Gourmet's view in his articles. Epicuras says "death is neither good nor bad for the dead, because the fear of one person is unfounded for one person, the fear of death is irrational" (Benatar, 175). I only noticed a century of contribution since the Hellenistic era. This era was dominated by the controversy between the epicurean school, the stoic school, academic skeptics, and because of the will of freedom, the argument is the determinism or the role of fate in managing human behavior and life I focused on. Stoic and Epicureans believe that all ordinary things, including the human soul, are material and follow nature's laws or principles. Stoic Sc ​​hool believes that all human choices and behaviors are determined by causality, but this is compatible with our "self" behavior. Chrysippus says that when your action "passes through you" your action is "by you" and that the deciding factor of your action stops according to your action rather than your own choice I insist that it is not a strong thing to the external environment, I will deliberately keep this position in front of you in your opinion of your choice The third thought we analyzed was epicureanism. For people of Epicurean, happiness is the source of happiness. Epicurean's concept of happiness may be far from the original idea, but these ideas often lead to the idea of ​​pursuing happiness. For epicurus, the heart of happiness is to use practical wisdom, or to know how to pursue what is good for you in a pain free life. Notably, in the letter to Mynoeceus, Epicurus details the relationship between various forms of happiness and its happiness. This is far from the epiculus philosophy. Hedonism promotes seeking happiness; but the pleasure you are seeking is not the happiness of the body, but the happiness of the soul, no interference, no interference is most important; Epicuras strives to eliminate external interference. As the most important materialist in the ancient world, Epicuras taught and wrote extensively on the nature of matter, especially the laws and emotions of atoms and their movement. Although he did not deny the existence of God, he rejected the power the myths gave them and the concept of actively interfering with their human lives. Historic materialist Karl Marx wrote a doctoral thesis of Epicurus, and Democrats are not coincidental.

When I walked along the street with my best friend, we decided to go through the book store, enter inside and see. When we were in the shop we saw a man sticking out like a thumb pain, and the head turned around from everyone he passed by. One of the most interesting things about this gentleman is that he does not seem to care too much about all the eyes worn by him, and he observes everything around him carefully I am incorporating everything. This person is placed in the Department of Philosophy. Please save and read the essence of Lucretius. Epicuras is responsible for the philosophy known as epicurenism. Epicurus has little patience against religion. In addition, there is no soul after death, humans have evolved to reach our present state, and we have qualities of free will. They think "nothing can happen" and "I do not do any intelligent design." Epicureanism said: "Our world is due to natural and accidental collisions and various kinds of atoms Combination of unintended agglomeration and coalescence, the sudden formation of these atoms can serve as a starting point for many fabrics - the earth, the sea, the sky, and the competition of living things. According to gourmet philosophy, One of the greatest pleasures in my life is friendship. The third thought we analyzed was epicureanism. For people of Epicurean, happiness is the source of happiness. Epicurean's concept of happiness may be far from the original idea, but these ideas often lead to the idea of ​​pursuing happiness. For epicurus, the heart of happiness is to use practical wisdom, or to know how to pursue what is good for you in a pain free life. Notably, in the letter to Mynoeceus, Epicurus details the relationship between various forms of happiness and its happiness. Is epicureanism a rational way of human happiness? We all wish to be naturally happy, but there is a doubt about the lifestyle that is committed to pursuit. We will admit that Jack is very happy with his food presence. But no one knows how long these activities can last for maintaining his interests. Part of his experience of happiness comes from the freshness of his activities: a new restaurant, a new art exhibition, a new story, a new boyfriend. However, only a limited amount of spice will be mixed into my food, and after all Jack will have the most unique experience adopting familiar patterns and will be routine. He will push the gem jewels to the hillside like Sisyphus. Furthermore, the joy experienced by Jack depends on fortune that can easily change. His leisure time will decrease if his college breaks his laziness.

1997/98 Recording on Westside (Assistant: Ed Chadwick) and Mayfair Studio (Assistant: Lee Phillips) in London This is far from the philosophy of Epicurus. Hedonism promotes search for happiness, but fun does not seek physical pleasure, but the pleasure of the soul, Atalaxia, no interference is the most important, Epicros' efforts are to prevent external interference To get rid of. Due to the nature of the problem, especially as the atomic law of the world's most important ancient materials, epicros, exercise, sensation and perception, abundant writing and education in particular. Although he did not deny the existence of God, he rejects myth but gives them power, they actively hinder the concept of human life. Material historical view Karl Marx wrote an accidental PhD dissertation not found in Epicurus and Democritus And since it is Saturday night it may be the moment of the week related to having the opportunity to seek happiness or experience happiness, but today I would like to talk about at least another approximate place. In other words, I would like to talk about the possibilities of extreme fun. But fun continues to be commercialized. It can be marketed, packaged and sold; perhaps the most attractive mass-produced item (happiness itself can be product itself: think of adult toys, "nursing experience", aspiring food etc.) . In the era of capitalist super consumption, happiness is a plan of making money.

We all recognize that death is inevitable; we are all dead. But there is much debate about what is death. Before asking if fear is reasonable, I think it is important to first discuss why we believe in that death. How can we fear if we do not know what we are afraid of? If I propose that death is a separation of physical thinking and spiritual thought, we have never spiritually died, but I can live in heaven or hell. This is reasonable as I may fall into hell. I began to believe that life is to achieve a leap of faith. The only fear that still makes sense is the fear of death. I am afraid to hurt the people I care. However, I tried to maximize my life in the embarrassment that I accepted, so let's hold these fears for the time being. Other than that, my point is that this is the first wall of the horror box. This is almost irrational fear, it is only outside my comfort zone. The most fragile. If I break that (well, at least that much), it feels awesome. I think that I can always do what I want to do. This box has more space to walk around! This is the kind of protection I really do not need. So I am not afraid of death. As Epicurus said, death has little meaning to our sensory organs, so it does not mean anything to us, so fearing what we can not make sense is meaningless. No, it is a logical inference to obey me, to obey the fact of death. The idea that it does not have an objective meaning since death makes life meaningless. In other words, all these meaningful efforts are absurd. This subtle doubt, everything I do is ridiculous, and my progress is to encourage I to consume religion and philosophy, accidentally rejecting the fearful reality of the perfect understanding of the end of death It took. I really want answers. I deeply believe that there is no objective intention in life, but I am looking for meaning in a meaningless world, and I am anxious to prove that I am wrong.

Early civilizations such as Egyptians and Babylonians accumulated practical knowledge about metallurgy, ceramics, and dye art, but did not form a systematic theory. The basic chemistry hypothesis first appeared in classical Greece. The theory of the four elements was eventually said to be fire, air, earth and water are all basic elements. Atomism in Greece could date back to 440 BC and appeared in the works of philosophers such as democrats and epicurus. History of Atmospheric Chemistry - History of the field of atmospheric science to study the chemical properties of the Earth 's atmosphere and other planets. It is an interdisciplinary research field utilizing the history of medicinal chemistry in the fields of environmental chemistry, physics, meteorology, computer modeling, oceanography, geology and volcanology - especially synthetic organic chemistry and pharmacology. History and various other biology majors, they are involved in the design, chemical synthesis and development of the pharmaceutical (drug) market It is not always considered formal science, but chemistry has run through the history of mankind. People have fermented food and drink for centuries. Extracting metals from ores is another "natural" chemical form, like making glass, soap and extracting vegetable ingredients for medicinal purposes. Archeologists have found pottery at their excavation site and bowls and glaze used to protect them are also derived from chemistry knowledge. As you can see, chemistry exists whether you define it or not. Because understanding of chemistry is very important in many other scientific disciplines, there are several different categories of chemistry. In fact, chemistry is often studied so that scientists can better understand their field.

Catholic and Protestant are one of the greatest denominations of the day. These sects continue to grow in the population. They can be traced back hundreds of years. They have similarities, but one part pays more attention to tradition, but the other part pay more attention to diversity. Their views prove that these sects are very different from one another. One difference between Catholic and Protestant is the question of validity and authorization of the Bible. A more traditional Protestant focuses on the Bible. The main reason is that illegal acts allow "free exploration" far more widely than Judaism and Catholics. Free search is another reason, that is, the result of overthrowing traditional beliefs. (In Professanism, freedom of thought is increased as lack of general beliefs and customs.Durchem stated that suicide is common in 'primitive' (tribal and non-Western) populations You may think of suicide as "self-sufficiency" of yourself (eg my wife commits suicide when my husband dies, an old man kills men). Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 at Prussia. His family was a Jew, but later he converted to pro-testanism. Marx majored in law at university, majoring in history and philosophy. He finished his university course in 1841. He confused too many governments on the African continent, eventually settled in London and died in 1883. "Ideology as a superstructure of civilization: constitutes a dominant practice and culture, but" dominant thinking "in a particular age is a" dominant thinking "of a dominant class: the dominant thought is a dominant substance Relationship, ideal expression of dominant idea. The dominant material relationship, hence the relationship, makes the class rulers, and therefore creates their dominant thinking These effects are expressed in the style of controversy used to write the Communist Party Declaration. Karl Marx was born in Trier of Prussia am Rhein on May 5, 1818. His family was a Jew, but in 1824 he converted to pro-testanism. This may be saying McClellan will have influence on religious feelings in Marx "... Marx is the most extreme form of alienation and religion must be the beginning of the process of secularization Mode: "Form of alienation" (Mac Lellan 88) This family is a trivial bourgeoisie (they mean to make a living for living, it is considered a middle class) His My father is a lawyer. After graduating from Jim (High School), Marx first studied history and philosophy in Bonn, then Berlin, then entered the university, enrolled in university, completed the university course in 1841, submitted a philosophy about Epicurus Did. Doctoral dissertation

Through our history, we have evolved and developed to the extent that we can explain the world we live in. Epicurus to Thomas Aquinas, from Aristotle, one of the best kings they taught, Alexander the Great, Sartre and Colonation are all looking for our reasons on this earth. Even our own hands will either drive or live to live us. When discussing the meaning of life, we must consider that all doctrine, argument, opposition, thought and emotion can only be explained and defined through the human perspective. Humans are fighting for the unimaginable High Stakes. At least today, billions of people are suffering. In the worst case, there are 400 million (or more) potential human, superhuman or postmortem whose presence is dependent on what we are doing and now. All complex civilizations that may be in the future, possible future experience, art and beauty depend on the present Human sufferings occur every day in all kinds and ways around us. We do not always see it, but it does not mean that it does not exist. When we see it, we usually ask ourselves ourselves. Yes, that makes sense. Since we are reading four readings, I can answer this question. However, as I deeply dug in this issue, I saw four readings with different views on the meaning or the meaning of pain. When you look at the definition of a verb (to feel or experience pain, persistent damage or loss), you can see that the pain is caused by multiple actions. Each reading describes different ways of suffering. With their basic knowledge, some people explain mental pain, but others describe the body, but each reading is more profound than some pain. The epic of Gilgamesh explains the pain caused by death.

"Because you are happy every day in your relationship you will not develop your courage.You will develop it by experiencing difficult times and difficult difficulties," the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus said Told. If there is one thing, history thinks our relationship is the most valuable thing in our life. From the moment we were born, we constantly built up our relationship and strengthened. In fact, everyone has the ability to limit their lives. By doing this, everyone can draw oneself as a social role. Ancient Greek literature, material culture, thought from Bronze Age to Hellenistic era. The course will provide a time frame for the analysis of Greek culture through its literature, arts and architecture, and values ​​and belief systems. The focus is a fundamental difference between the debt of contemporary culture against the ancient Greeks and our separation from the ancient world. Students are asked to analyze ancient things and sentences and to think critically Ancient Greek literature is the literature written in ancient Greek from early text to the Byzantine Empire. The earliest surviving works of ancient Greek literature can be traced back to the early period of the ancient times, they are two epic poems, Iliad and Odyssey of the Michael era. These two epics, and Homer Epic and Hesiad, Theogonie and works and days, form a major basis for the tradition of Greek literature that will follow the classical, Greek and Roman era. Ancient Greek literature means literature written in Greek until the 4th century. Western European Greek literature had spread from the 4th century AD to the emergence of Alexander the Great. Ancient Greek literature, along with the Hebrew Bible, provides the foundation for all Western literature. Most epics and tragedies come from ancient Greek religions and Greek myths. Greek myths have had widespread influence on the culture, art and literature of Western civilization. Although the ancient Greek religion based on these stories has declined for a long time, the Greek myths are still active and energetic, mainly through the epics and tragedies of ancient Greek literature, Western novels, poetry, movies and visual art It is abundant resources of.

What constitutes knowledge The function of the mind has always been the focus of the origin of philosophers from humanity. One of the main focus of what many thinkers have thought is to constitute knowledge. At first glance the problem seems to be cut off and dry, but the problem has become more complicated. This can be witnessed by many different epistemological theories advocated by various times. This can be seen by observing the four different views on classical knowledge, Plato, Epicurus, Stoic, skepticism. Knowledge theory (epistemology) is a philosophical study on the nature, scope and limitations of knowledge composition, acquisition and analysis. The fundamental problem that is not solved by epistemology is the definition of knowledge. There are differences among philosophers in this problem, some people analyze it as a reasonable true belief, others are different, and rational true beliefs do not constitute knowledge . The purpose of this paper is to compare Plato and Aristotle's knowledge theory. Empiricism and rationalism answer the source of knowledge, the problem of nature, but do not properly solve the problem of composition of knowledge. One theory that attempts to answer this question is a tripartite theory that states that knowledge has three main factors: belief, reason, and truth, or knowledge is a reasonable true belief. According to this theory, if you believe in something with a good reason, this constitutes knowledge. (Holt, 2006). Faith is the first condition as long as people do not believe it can be known even if it is true. You must believe that it can be knowledge. Therefore, knowledge requires faith. Of course, not all beliefs constitute knowledge. Faith is necessary, but it is not enough to gain knowledge. We sometimes make us mistake what we believe; in other words, some of our beliefs are true, but the other beliefs are wrong. When we are going to acquire knowledge, we strive to increase our stock of true beliefs (while minimizing our false beliefs). We can say that the most typical purpose of faith is to explain or capture the actual existence of things; that is, when a person forms a belief, a person can think between human ideas and the world We are seeking a match of. (Of course, they may form beliefs for other reasons, making positive attitudes, deceiving yourself, etc). But when asking for knowledge, we are trying to do things right. Match; some of our beliefs do not explain the actual existence of things

Therefore, since the mind, body and soul are interrelated, the soul must die with the body, so the soul must be deadly so people do not experience anything after death I guess. This is the third version of Lucretius's Super Sparknotes version, "About the nature of matter". It looks pretty on such a page, but when it is decomposed into consideration of mankind and existence, much is taken in the context of academic theory, just as it applies to the lack of better things It becomes more complicated. The word real life. In a famous article, Bernard Williams objected to Epicuras' claim that death was never evil. He believes premature death is unfortunate, but we will never do good. Williams discussed the drama of Karelâāapek. In the theater Elina Makropulos was given her lifetime elixir by her father and extended her life span for 300 years. In Williams, her life at the age of 342 became boring, indifferent, indifferent. Elina refused to take the elixir again to save her life, and she died. Williams believes that immortal humans will inevitably feel bored or overcome due to repeated experiences The meaning of epicurus in life rejects immortality and mysticism; there is a soul, but it is as deadly as the body. There is no future life, but people do not need to be afraid of death. Because "death does not mean anything to us, because it does not make sense for us because death does not feel". He founded a school that teaches that living according to reason and virtue is in harmony with the sacred order of the universe. And that is because people understand the signs or rationality of the universe. Everyone. The meaning of life is "no pain" (Gr: απαθεια), that is, objective and "clear judgment" through indifference, not indifferent.

Isolated from Sullen Squire, Beaux Stratagem is considered the best script written by George Farquhar. Jonne C. Thornton cried out that "Beaux Stratagem is a representative of Restoration comedy" (4). Unlike those of contemporaries, Farquhar used more drama installations, subframes, characters, and surprises (Thornton 4). Farquhar has a unique game structure that leads to a combination of carefree comedy and serious potential social problems. The social problem as a theme of the play is to accept divorce. Farquhar's divorce perspective is anticipating their times. The subject of divorce is controversial, and strictly prohibited in a polite company. The law rarely stipulates that a couple is permitted to divorce and that women do not permit remarriage or claim from the husband financial compensation. Beaux Stratagem decided that Squire Sullen and his wife agreed to divorce by the parties. Mrs. Saren expressed her resentment to Saren's treatment because it was clearly rebellious against the time and foresight of contemporary women's claims. Indeed, Beaux Stratagem by Fraquhar was not an initial women's freedom, but as a call for liberalization of the divorce law it may be due to his own unhappy marriage. Gravitt's paper entitled his article "Beaux Strategem" entitled "Introduction: Happy New Foodmanism in Farquhar". Farker's central focus on this drama is the moral concept of the new epicurean. He admits other topics like divorce, money, and nature but he believes that the dominant theme includes the epicurean's first principle and the idea found in the popular resurgence of the epicurus in the latter half of the 17th century It is. Gravitt states a simple definition of Epicurean ethics. (39) "Happiness comes primarily from freedom of body pain and spiritual excitement? (39). Basic epicure is considered to be pleasure, courage and justice. (39) The moral value of these food items is expressed primarily through the behavior of Aime Well and Archer characters.

Someone once said to me best friends are those who tell you how they feel. It may hurt the feelings of this person, but I do not think this is a true best friend. A true best friend should support you with goodwill and tell you things. In the article "Secret Ritual of Love and Death", the author noticed that she will soon lose her best friend. I hope that I will know when I will lose my best friend. "I am confident that we need help, so we do not need friends' help." Epicurus may think we need a friend for us. "The pain suffering of my old friends and colleagues, and my poor soldiers broke my heart, believing in me, the battle of failure will be depressing like battle. I am free from the bigger evils; however, in order to win the fight like Waterloo, the sacrifice of so many brave friends can only be called a great misery, not the result of the masses. Luckily it was fortunate that 10,000 injured soldiers died or were found in a nearby hospital, during which the injured usually suffered a deadly fatal injury, the injured robbed the battlefield I was a battlefield when I was 10 years old. In this battle this fierce eternal war has spread to my country like sickness. The soldiers and their sturdy leather boots walked on the lawn and spread my love and joy. The bullets flew through the air, and these people contaminated my calm with gunpowder and bloody. My house is a battlefield, and my love is destroyed. When I was 20 years the war continued. Until it stops suddenly ... it will continue. The snow fell on a long withered grass. The snow fell and the bullet flew until the last gentle wafer fell from the sky. Like dominoes and card house in a lonely plane, they all fell. They are headed for the rhythm of frozen death and harsh rhythm. One million troops have arrived here, and there are still one million sky cannons. My grandfather was elected as World War II as an infantry. He talked to my father about the story that soldiers ate for breakfast in the morning did not come back at night. One day, after the grenade exploded, his left ear was damaged. Many times he pretended to escape to escape from the Russian army. He was lucky to live when he reached home. But after the end of the Second World War, my grandfather could not return home. He was imprisoned by Russians and spent the next 5 years cold weather and severe confinement. As a prisoner, he was asked to repair the surface he destroyed during the war. When he returned home in 1950, the war had already kicked him out. He lost his spirit and imagination to create a better future

A summary of justice in ancient Greek and Indian mythological and philosophical traditions: I studied the role of justice in ancient Greece and Indian early myths and philosophical traditions. Specifically, it focuses on the goddess's justice, the relationship with the great mother as Our Lady, and ultimate judgment on all reality. I first address the historical similarities between the development of the concept of justice in ancient Greece and India and conclude by studying their philosophical similarity. Western philosophical tradition began to become serious in ancient Greece in the 6th century BC and formed the central group of the first philosophers entitled "Philosophy Prior to Socrates" (Ancient Greek philosophy, paragraph 4). Other ancient Greek philosophers, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zeno of Cities, Epicurus, and Iris pillows, have disappeared and continue to influence contemporary ideas leaving traces behind. The fact that there is a clear and understandable similarity between ancient Greek philosophy and contemporary thought can not be denied. However, the early Greeks thought that the way of today's world was explained as a whole and thought that the fields of science, religion and philosophy were intertwined and integrated into the world view (Knierim 1). A summary of justice in ancient Greek and Indian mythological and philosophical traditions: I studied the role of justice in ancient Greece and Indian early myths and philosophical traditions. Specifically, it focuses on the goddess's justice, the relationship with the great mother as Our Lady, and ultimate judgment on all reality. - The early civilization and the dawn of medieval history are the achievements of mankind for the past 5000 years. Human beings live on this earth for about 500,000 years, but history covers only a part of this period. The reason is that history is basically based on a written document. However, since 3000 BC, humans know the art of writing 1.1 History: importance and importance The word "history" comes from Greek "history". ' Many cultures in history think about the essence of the heart, soul, soul, and the brain. Philosophical concern for behavior and thinking dates back to the ancient civilization of Egypt, Greece, China and India. Psychology is one area of ​​philosophy, mainly until developing into an independent scientific field in Germany and the United States until mid-19th century. These philosophical roots play an important role in the development of this field. From about 600 BC to about 300 BC, Greek philosophers have explored a wide range of topics related to what we think is psychology now. Socrates and his followers, Plato and Aristotle wrote articles on happiness, pain, knowledge, motivation, and reasoning themes. Whether they theoretically characterize humans, whether congenital or empirical, is still the subject of current psychological debate.

They vary from region to region, but there are many common elements of the cosmic myth that seems to be essential to this type. The idea of ​​creation and origin of prototype such as prototype chaos, dualism, creation, and speculation by sacrifice includes four ideas that lay the foundation of later cultural doctrine. They can start very simply and can become increasingly complicated over time. They may be distorted as they are communicated through verbal traditions. Then, when they are written down, the meaning may change. Plato has a distinct traditional myth. For example, the giggles story (Republic 359 d - 360 b), the Fehton myth (Timaeu ​​22 c 7), or Amazon (804 e 4 rule). Sometimes he will more or less modify them, and from time to time he will combine them - for example the nobility lies (Republic 414b - 415d) is a combination of Kademia 's self - harmonious myths. The era of humanoid myth. There are also my own myths in Plato's myths, such as Er's myth (Republic 621b8) and Atlantis's myth (Timaeu ​​s 26e 4). Many Myths Plateau invents the characteristics and patterns of traditional myths (such as 'blessed islands' and 'postmortem decisions') and distinguishes their mythological themes from traditional mythological themes It may be difficult. As Plato's Timaeu ​​is explained as a person interpreting "a possible story" in the form of a myth, throughout the history critics have an opinion on which elements of myths can be regarded as Plato's position It does not match. However, Sedley called it the "creationist declaration" and pointed out that some of Plato's followers denied his intentions in classical times like Aristotle, Epicurus, Stoic, Garen. Such writers believe that the world of Plato was born out of "smart" creative behavior Plato has the concept of "demiouge" with the best wisdom and wisdom as the creator of the universe in his work It is a character to explain. Plato's famous Atlantis myth first appeared in Timias, and it was dramatically placed on the second day after the republican debate, but the scholars now agree that it is already late . The myth of Atlantis continues unfinished dialogue aimed at becoming a sequel to Timaeu, Critias. Timaeus is also known for its description about the creation of the universe of Demiurge. Unlike the creation of medieval theologians of God, Plato's Demi Urugi does not create the emptiness of the former, but orders the universe to remove chaotic elemental substances and imitate the eternal form. Plato uses four elements of fire, air, water, and the earth (Plato claims to be made up of various triangular polymers). We call various compounds of these elements the universe. Among all Plato's works, Timaeus provides the most detailed guesses of what we consider now to be natural science: physics, astronomy, chemistry and biology.

Opportunities to promote virtue and opportunity advantages and happiness. Happiness has been debated for centuries. What is happiness? What is happiness made of. What contributed to happiness. Among many others, Aristotle, Epicurus, and the famous ancient Greek philosopher Sylena School made a big contribution to this virtue. It is a part of excellence, and it is an opportunity that includes human domination and prediction. All other events may work. Role of Happiness After analyzing the work of these philosophers, people have reached the conclusion that virtue greatly promotes happiness. Regarding the importance of happiness opportunities, Aristotle believes that a happy person is according to virtue "happiness is done best and everything is perfectly harmonized at every event". It is only a few great big unhappies to limit the happiness of such a life, but "beautiful things will shine even in this kind of situation." Aristotle talked about his opinion about the happiness of his generation of the same generation, "It is ruthless and seems to be against the view of a person," he said, "There is absolutely no impact on my descendants and the destiny of all my friends" Stated. "But he said it would seem weak and small if something could pass through the dead, whether it was a good one or not. We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state. Aristotle believes that meditation is the highest realization of happiness. He writes in chapter X.7-8. "It is reasonable to expect that if happiness is consistent with virtue activities, it is reasonable to expect that it will follow the best virtue ... this activity is meditative." The most fruitful activities we can do, It is to bring proper happiness. And in order to be happy, two conditions must be satisfied. First and foremost, a person must be completely kind. Secondly, it needs to be "equipped with foreign currency". Quoting means complete virtue depends on some degree of stability of material comfort. In other words, there are some objective conditions to make other people happy. Aristotle may guess that people believe they need stable shelter, food and friendship.

Light is usually a symbol of purity, power, authority. For this reason, many historical religions and cults have defined the concept of light as the most important definitional feature of God. Some ancient religions have even developed around the sun worship. In ancient Egypt, there were two minor religions at different times, and they were early forms of Judaism. These two belief systems have many features, such as the importance of light and the existence of a central religious leader, but there are some important differences in the practice of the development of Athens and the early Judaism and worship there is. It is an important concept in many religions, including Jewish denominations and ancient Egyptian religions. Many people are familiar with the God of the Bible, but most people may have never heard of Egyptian sun god Asten. The worship of these gods is remarkably different, but the Egyptian gods of the sun have remarkable similarities with the God of Israel. - Witch - a magician of Satan, or just another religion. In today's society, new religions are overflowing. One of the oldest, but fastest growing beliefs of today is magic. Since the 13th century, this earth-based, naturally-oriented belief has been established, but it has only recently started to spread all over the world. No matter where we are, we will see something related to magical practice. The first volume began in 1350 BC, in honor of the Hieroglyphs of the God of the Sun, with a wonderful hymn to Atten. The creation myth of Babylon led to the creation of God, Madok, the Creator of God who built the world from the body of Tiamato. From chaos and the sea, Babylon was born, but before she defeated Maduk, she created a monster containing the first dragon whose veins were filled with poison rather than blood. Hesiod was in the late eighth century BC. I reviewed the birth of the gods of Olympus and the paths unfortunately encountered by deadly people - Prometheus and Pandora. According to chronological order, Anthology introduces Gilgamesh epic, Lucretius, Epicurus poet and Genesis 1-4 John Foster recently commented on this hymn. By examining hymns, he explained the attributes of Atten. As Stanza 7 says "only God, there is no one else", little or no mention is made of "great hymns" and most other Amarna's works. To the gods of the Pantheon of ancient Egypt. Akhenaten clearly showed to his subject that his authority is the best, at least for the moment the old way has disappeared.

Looking for more data and statistics? For more information on the latest statistics and risks about suicide please visit the CDC website www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/ suicide / index.html. Health care workers can help suicide prevention by understanding risk factors and using evidence-based therapies and treatments. In addition, the Joint Committee recommends using proven, population-specific tools to screen suicide risks of all patients in all medical settings. Clinicians should be informed that it is no longer acceptable to "sign a safety contract" with the patient. The management and limitation of safety plans for future suicide ideas (elimination or ensuring the safe storage of potentially fatal items) has proven to be an effective way to prevent suicide. Healthcare professionals can find educational materials on the Zero Suicide website or find news on the latest research at NIMH's website www.nimh.nih.gov. For general information on mental health and regional treatment services in your area, please call the help abend for drug abuse and mental health service management (SAMHSA) treatment (1-800-662-HELP (4357)) . SAMHSA also has its own web site behavior therapy locator that can be searched by location In the suicide prevention program, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline encourages to ask questions when worrying about suicide. Let's ask the person, "Are you considering suicide?" Do not worry about putting out ideas or making you uneasy. People who are considering suicide are often relieved because someone is worried about asking them. If you are considering suicide ask if you have something that you can keep, like weapons and drugs, to help them keep them safe. Listen to their opinions without any judgment and ask if there are other people who are willing to talk to them. If they want to talk to family, friends, therapists, or religious leaders, please help them connect. And keep in touch - If you know that someone is struggling, please contact them regularly to make sure they are okay It is complicated to ask the child whether there is a risk of suicide. In this short video we ask parents to ask and answer some of these questions, but more importantly, parents are asked to understand if their children are at risk of suicide Answer I will show you how to ask these questions until I get. .... And what to do Kant's paternal moral opinion on suicide interventions suggests that the latter has a large problem of rationality of suicidal behavior. In the case of KP, the central question asked about suicide is whether or not suicide reasonably determined that it is consistent with her chosen purpose, regardless of what its purpose is. Some philosophers have proposed a priori reasons for rational skepticism. If that sounds, these arguments will indicate that the concept of 'reasonable suicide' is conceptual irrationality. But they are obviously not perfect. These arguments are based on the concept of epicurus, ie the rationality to end human life depends on comparing the life that continues to coexist with the state of death. Assuming that death is not a human condition, or at least not a state of human experience, the rationality of suicide becomes difficult to understand.

In this month's reading group, I hope to draw attention of writers who feel that you deserve more attention. At the end of last year, we asked you to name the gems ignored in 2017. It seems to be a huge success. In particular, I finally read Eley Williams' wonderful (recently awarded) Attrib. Now I would like to broaden this opportunity again and I would like to find a writer who might be missing or a writer deserving special attention. The word of reference is as wide as you desire. If you feel that there is not enough people to enjoy the view of Lucretius epicurus philosophy, please win the De Rerum Natura nomination. On the other side, if you think you are you you let me know if you think you know a writer you will be the next big thing And we would like to hear the voice of a great, old writer who is no longer subject to mainstream coverage, is unjustly forgotten, or needs a little special love. It is a most forgotten genius, such as a confusing old-fashioned Titan, such as Alfred Chester, John Fowles, an eternal outsider like Dan Fant, a quietly wonderful occupation like Leslie Gloucester, or a May-Tan Independent publishing inspiration like Tan, this is your choice This book is widely available and reading it will bring us all good things. If you can provide some information on this book and why the author is important it is also very exciting. I will weigh these proposals together in a few days, wear a hat, and regain the book to read the results. In addition, a very good choice means that we have to make a decision without a definite winner. Should I read a book on data science and artificial intelligence to prove my future career? Should I improve my communication skills so that I can become a better leader? Or should we read the latest exercise study, diet book, parenting guide to raise our personal life to the next level? All of these areas are important, comparing them may compare apples, oranges and almonds So, how many personal development books and articles should we read in a year? As long as we can blend into our lives. If you really have a book, please read it again. I will slow down this time, take a note and read the chapter until I execute the strategy. Remember, if you are just applying for a book, you are ahead of those who have read only one thousand already. We should acquire a healthy habit of reading books. And the books we read bring morality to us. These books may develop or destroy our personality, so we need to choose carefully. There are many advantages to reading a good book, which is very useful for our personality. A bad book destroys our character and lets us acquire unhealthy customs. We should allow children and teenagers to read good books. Because they are the future of the country. They should learn from the courses found in these books. A good book is "Friend, Inquirer of Truth and Guide".

Catholic and Protestant are one of the greatest denominations of the day. These sects continue to grow in the population. They can be traced back hundreds of years. They have similarities, but one part pays more attention to tradition, but the other part pay more attention to diversity. Their views prove that these sects are very different from one another. One difference between Catholic and Protestant is the question of validity and authorization of the Bible. A more traditional Protestant focuses on the Bible. The main reason is that illegal acts allow "free exploration" far more widely than Judaism and Catholics. Free search is another reason, that is, the result of overthrowing traditional beliefs. (In Professanism, freedom of thought is increased as lack of general beliefs and customs.Durchem stated that suicide is common in 'primitive' (tribal and non-Western) populations You may think of suicide as "self-sufficiency" of yourself (eg my wife commits suicide when my husband dies, an old man kills men). Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 at Prussia. His family was a Jew, but later he converted to pro-testanism. Marx majored in law at university, majoring in history and philosophy. He finished his university course in 1841. He confused too many governments on the African continent, eventually settled in London and died in 1883. "Ideology as a superstructure of civilization: constitutes a dominant practice and culture, but" dominant thinking "in a particular age is a" dominant thinking "of a dominant class: the dominant thought is a dominant substance Relationship, ideal expression of dominant idea. The dominant material relationship, hence the relationship, makes the class rulers, and therefore creates their dominant thinking These effects are expressed in the style of controversy used to write the Communist Party Declaration. Karl Marx was born in Trier of Prussia am Rhein on May 5, 1818. His family was a Jew, but in 1824 he converted to pro-testanism. This may be saying McClellan will have influence on religious feelings in Marx "... Marx is the most extreme form of alienation and religion must be the beginning of the process of secularization Mode: "Form of alienation" (Mac Lellan 88) This family is a trivial bourgeoisie (they mean to make a living for living, it is considered a middle class) His My father is a lawyer. After graduating from Jim (High School), Marx first studied history and philosophy in Bonn, then Berlin, then entered the university, enrolled in university, completed the university course in 1841, submitted a philosophy about Epicurus Did. Doctoral dissertation

Comparison of Babylonian art and Egyptian art In the history of humankind, many prosperous empires dominated all over the world. Babylon and Egypt are two of the two empires that are nearly 500 years apart, but one thing in common is a wonderful work of art. Mimilim 's works like Babylonian' s work, and mural paintings offered by the Queen of Egyptian Neferati for Isis are examples of wonderful works of their time. Both pieces have rich meaning and background, and there are many similarities, but as time goes on, these styles may look different. Early civilizations such as Egyptians and Babylonians accumulated practical knowledge about metallurgy, ceramics, and dye art, but did not form a systematic theory. The basic chemistry hypothesis first appeared in classical Greece. The theory of the four elements was eventually said to be fire, air, earth and water are all basic elements. Atomism in Greece could date back to 440 BC and appeared in the works of philosophers such as democrats and epicurus. Comparison of Babylonian art and Egyptian art In the history of humankind, many prosperous empires dominated all over the world. Babylon and Egypt are two of the two empires that are nearly 500 years apart, but one thing in common is a wonderful work of art. Mimilim 's works like Babylonian' s work, and mural paintings offered by the Queen of Egyptian Neferati for Isis are examples of wonderful works of their time. Egyptian hieroglyphics are a prescribed writing system used by ancient Egyptians to express their language, a system combining logo and alphabet elements. The geographic system is the earliest writing system used in Africa, China, and Central America (Historical World, 2015). Egyptians use hieroglyphs as papyrus and tree religious literature Art is very important for Egyptian culture which lasted until about 3000 BC. About 1000 BC, art symbolized Egyptian faith and daily life. For Egyptians, art is a religious experience. Egyptians believe that incomplete art can confuse the gods. Egypt has grown over time, but the standards and styles of art have also grown. Egyptian art emphasizes the sculpture of Egyptian culture known as Pharaoh and Pyramid, but the mythical aspect is that Egyptian religion is not as famous as Greek or Roman myths. Like many other ancient civilizations, the Egyptians worship their gods for protection and prosperity. Unlike many other civilizations, Egyptian gods are not so scary creatures. They are a powerful and beautiful life, cultivate and lead

Clazomenae's Anaxagoras - Greek philosopher of truly gifted Anaxagoras is explained as the last major Greek philosopher. Anaxagoras is an Ionian. He was born in Turkey today. Little is known about his early life. We know that he is from a wealthy family, but he gave up on this wealth and made himself a scientist. Anakusagoras is thought to be the first person to introduce philosophy to the Athenians when the Athenians moved there in 480 BC. During staying in Anaxa Goras in Athens, Pellicle held power. Another important person from the era before Socrates, Anaxagoras of Clazomenae is a powerful philosopher and scientist who lived in Athens for nearly 30 years and taught. His philosophical view mainly evolves around nature itself. Like most of the ancient Greek philosophers, his ideas contrasted with contemporary ideologies and beliefs, confronted it and confronted him with life-threatening consequences. Anaxagoras is considered the first place to establish a complete philosophy in Athens and this site will continue to reach its peak and continue to affect society for the next hundreds of years. He spends most of his time describing nature - treating the universe as an indiscriminate mass until it is handled by a spiritual element he does not call "nothing". He believes that everything in the material world contains everything else Clazomenae's Anaxagoras - Greek philosopher of truly gifted Anaxagoras is explained as the last major Greek philosopher. Anaxagoras is an Ionian. He was born in Turkey today. Little is known about his early life. We know that he is from a wealthy family, but he gave up on this wealth and made himself a scientist. Anakusagoras is thought to be the first person to introduce philosophy to the Athenians when the Athenians moved there in 480 BC. - The living of the Greek philosopher Socrates (BC 469-399 BC) shows an important point in the Western idea that the standard history divides the Greek philosophy into a period before Socrates and a period after Socratic. Socrates did not leave his own work, and his work affected as many different interpretations as interpreters. He is still one of the most important and mysterious figures in Western philosophy. Nearly 2000, we have always believed that the universe life is like life on Earth. Greek philosopher Annaxagoras suggested that life was created by "species interspersed in space" in the 5th century BC. Other Greek philosophers like Anaxarchus and Epicurus also believe life is scattered among stars. However, no one thinks that humans will encounter such living organisms. The first record of aliens depicts Lucien, a Greek philosopher from the 2nd century. In 'real history' many people think that this is the first science fiction novel. The hero was attacked by a whirlwind and got into the moon, where he met a man with mushrooms, cloud centaurs, and wings with wings. Please fight in the acorn. "It must be an alien, but all these creatures are based on a mixture of real life on Earth.

Aristotle's "Nicmaco Ethics" thinks that humans should sacrifice and ultimately aim for their own happiness. In this paper I assert that my best interests are good. First, I will explain the concept of Aristotle's Udaimonia and virtue and then emphasize the intimacy of both. Next, I will talk about the role of human beings in society. Third, I will explain the essential connection of human behavior. The story of Aristotle is detailed in Nicomachean Ethics and Eudemian Ethics. In a nutshell, for Aristotle, eudaimonia is involved in the activity and shows virtue (sometimes translated as excellent) on grounds. This concept of Udaimonia comes from the fact that Aristotle understands the essentialism of the essence of human beings, and thinks the reason (which may be translated as a reason mark) is a human viewpoint It is. Or a perfect sport. The reason is that basically happiness (eudaimonia) is obtained by appropriately developing their highest and most human capabilities. Therefore, human eudaimonia is a reasonable achievement (areté) Aristotle's ethical theory is eudaimonist as it claims that eudaimonia is dependent on virtue. But Aristotle's clear view is that virtue is necessary, but it is not enough for Jews. While emphasizing the importance of spiritual rationality, he did not ignore the importance of other "goods" such as friends, wealth, power, which is a voluntary life. If a person lacks a particular foreign item such as "good birth, good child, beautiful", he doubts whether it is possible that it is eudaimonic. Therefore, ugly, or "Death of a dead child or best friend" (1099b 5 - 6), or an isolated person will never become eudaimon. In this way, "coincidentally" and "silly luck" can make a person fall into eudaimonia. The important difference between Ermonism and Plato and Aristotle in Epicura is that the latter virtue is part of eudaimonia and Epicross is to make virtue a means of happiness. Let's consider Aristotle's theory about this difference. Aristotle believes that eudaimonia is what everyone wants (and Epicurus will also agree). He also believes that eudaimonia is best performing benign activities according to reason. Good people think they are willing to do the right thing for the right moral and intelligent features (see eg Nicomachean Ethics 1099a 5). However, Aristotle does not believe pursuing benign activities for happiness. Happiness is a by-product of benign behavior: it simply does not cause good behavior. Aristotle does not believe that we are targeting eudaimonia. Virtue is the greatest part of eudaimon's life.

This list of philosophers of ancient Greece includes philosophers who studied and talked about Greek in ancient Greece. The philosophy of ancient Greece began with the philosopher Maretus and the former Socratic philosopher Thales [1] [2], and also continued in the late ancient period. Some of the most famous and influential philosophers of history such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle came from the ancient Greek world. Abbreviations used in this list: Proposed the first known model to place the sun in the center of the known universe where the earth rotates The first philosopher; I think the first principle (arche) is water; one of the seven Greek wise men Ancient Greek philosophers played an important role not only in the formation of Western philosophical traditions but also in the formation of modern philosophical ideas. Many philosophers and other theorists today acknowledge that the ancient Greek philosophy has influenced the whole spirit of the Western for centuries (Barnes 5). However, according to this article, the grounds and exploration did not start with the ancient Greeks, but the former Socratic philosophers work hard to determine the basic standards that can be used to explain the entire universe I made an effort. There was great progress in key areas such as geometry, logic and science. This paper discusses the pioneering work of ancient Greek philosophers and the influence of thought on modern thought. This list of philosophers of ancient Greece includes philosophers who studied and talked about Greek in ancient Greece. The philosophy of ancient Greece began with Milets and the former Socratic philosopher Thales and continued until the end of the ancient period. Some of the most famous and influential philosophers of history such as Socrates, Plato and Aristotle came from the ancient Greek world. Abbreviations used in this list: The Western philosophical tradition began to become serious in ancient Greece in the 6th century BC and formed the central group of the first philosophers entitled "Philosophy before Socrates" (Ancient Greek philosophy, paragraph 4). Other ancient Greek philosophers, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Cenes' Zeno, Epicurus, and Iris pillow, have disappeared and continue to influence contemporary ideas leaving traces. The fact that there is a clear and understandable similarity between ancient Greek philosophy and contemporary thought can not be denied. However, the way the early Greeks believed in the world today was explained as a whole, the fields of science, religion and philosophy are intertwined and integrated into the world view (Knierim 1).

Significance of being a man of justice For many years, the first birth of mankind can be traced back to what makes men the ultimate problem of justice. Many great philosophers are thinking about this. Due to the nature of human diversity, many opinions have been advocated, so the answers to the questions are varied. Whether there is an objective answer to this question is still a mystery. Both Plato and Epicurus made detailed comments on what makes people fair. Plato believes that justice comes from something dealing with the inner position of the soul. This is inconsistent with the opinion that Epicuras believes that justice is more physical or not exquisitely glossy. "When someone tells a man to be a man, they mean there is a way to be a man, a man is more than just a thing - it is the way, the way to go, the way to walk. Being good at being good at being is not meant to mean everything, meaning always means something, be male or become more masculine Masculinity is of fire It shows closely related to tenacity, courage and courage, and it can not exist without easy growth.Seneca said: "Those who never face adversity There is no unhappy person, because he can not prove himself. " I do not mean everyone. In other words, in August 2015, I invited a man to my apartment and when he was still kissing in clothes, he put out a penis. I mean that the man did not ask and did not tell me he was taking this action. In other words, when I said that I was sick, I kissed after saying "I've never done something I do not want to do". I did not take his cock after he finished speaking, but he began to remove himself in turn. When I stop him and insist that he should go, he sits in my bed and asks if he can stay overnight. When I told him I was in poor condition, he said "I do not do anything, this is not a big deal", he said that he is not worth a 10 minute discussion. When I finally told to leave my house, he got up. He means that we can not see tears in my eyes. I mean he is still looking forward for a kiss of goodnight

When thinking about ways people live a good life, they think of many ideas. Whether it is wealth, family or beauty, it is necessary to consider the theory of early philosophers. Those early philosophers included Plato, Aristotle, Stoic, Epicurean. These four people are committed to improving their lives and are the foundation of most philosophical theories. Obviously, you need to read, understand and discuss these four in order to better understand human life. They are always thinking about how to build a perfect life and society. "Without philosophy, Lucirios will realize that he can not live a truly happy life or even a tolerable life. Even though I start this research, it is perfect wisdom to make my life happy. , Such understanding must be confirmed and resolved through daily rehearsals more work is to obey the goal of glory rather than imagining them.I have an excellent intention that you will be a good heart Please increase your power until you have it. "(A letter from morality) Happiness has been debated since the beginning of philosophy - articles about happiness were written by Plato and Aristotle. Many people believe that bringing a reasonable life or living a good life brings happiness to people. This is quite different from today's discussion of happiness. As we have many things in our culture, we emphasize the wrong things. Things become more important than people, emotions become more important than existence, experience becomes more important than personality, happiness becomes more important than happiness. To make matters worse, I changed these two to the same one. The words happiness and happiness are also published in the literature of moral philosophy. Most people think that happiness is one of the most important goals in life. We tend to think happiness as emotion, and for most Greeks it is like a state of happiness or luck more. Epireanism and stoicism are two practical philosophies whose purpose is not simply to decide the truth and then to live wisely and happily. I am interested in understanding the understanding of happiness between Stoic and Epicurus as a student of the philosophy department. I chose this topic because I want to know the true meaning of happiness many people do not know. In this task we will explain the differences and comparisons of happiness and their views, according to Stoic and Epicurean. Then I will end with my personal evaluation

He is okay, it is not intended. Then he is evil. He is capable and pleased. Where does evil come from? He is willing to do it. Why do you call him God? "- Epicurus (341-271 BC) The problem here is whether morality is really independent from the existence of God, or whether it depends on human existence and its ability to create God. Act, many people listen to their voice, usually the voice of God, we must pay attention to the origin of morality and unethical behavior. "Once again, if someone says they hear the sound, you will soon jump into psychosis, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia," Colette said. However, according to the survey, the audible sounds are not so rare. A survey in 1991 - the biggest survey so far - found that 10% to 15% of the Americans experienced some form of sensory illusion in their lives. Other studies and increasing advocacy campaigns indicate that listening to the sound is not necessarily a sign of psychological distress. The illusion is that people see, hear, smell, or feel that everyone can not see, hear, smell, or feel. Sound is the most common type of hallucination of schizophrenia. Many people in this sickness have heard the sound. That voice can tell someone about their behavior, command them to do things, or alert dangerous people. Sometimes the voices speak to each other. People with schizophrenia may hear that sound for a long time before families and friends notice problems. Other types of hallucinations include looking at people and things that do not exist, sniffing no one else being detected, touching the body when you touch an invisible finger when no one is nearby Yes. This may be a particularly strange experience: some people played audio clips recorded by their voice long ago, but for that person they heard their voices. .. The voices in their minds are the sounds they hear when talking to other people all day long, different from their thoughts. For most people it seems that it is a bit lower than what they hear from the speakers. We are used to spreading sounds in the air, but people sometimes experience it through more intensive media. For example, when children in the pool are discussing each other underwater. Water warps the regular sound. It is because water is full of substances and the speed of sound waves slows as sound waves pass. This leads to a longer frequency, which means a lower tone

Helen Keller, the first person who got a bachelor's degree in art of hearing loss and blindness, claimed that "I prefer walking with friends in the dark rather than acting alone." so. Likewise, John Seles' s "A Separate Peace" two main characters, Gene and Finny, is a school where young people connect with their closest friends. In this country, when the country experienced difficulties or troubles, the 17-year-old intellectual Gene Forrester was a vibrant bold school athlete, Phineas A handsome freshman, Jason "J. D.", Veronica (Wynonna Ryder) finally got tired of false friendship he bullied with Heather and other children. A rebellious and mysterious outsider, Christian Slater came to school. Veronica fell in love with him, they started dating. Verdonia told J. D. Because she wanted to let Heather die, her life will be much easier. The following morning they came to her house, JD. It is said to be a treatment for hangover, but it is actually a drain cleaner. Heather is dead, Veronica and JD have made it look like suicide. From this moment, a strange teenage suicide group began. Barnes offers the following services. Theoretical atomicity may mean (a) conceptual atomicity, (b) geometrical atomicity, or (c) logical atomicity. Now (a) is only the concept of epicurus, as with the power of vision, there is a lower limit to the power of thought. We have already seen that this epicurean concept does not give a clear meaning to the theoretical inseparability. For (b) and (c), it seems that the difference between them is not clear. If we consider the theoretical inseparability as (c), that atom is theoretically inseparable. "If a is an atom it is logically impossible to divide a." But this seems to be unlikely to give us anything. A practical practical concept is that atomic volumes do not contain mathematically distinguishable parts unless it is folded into (b). It is clear that democratic atomism is the transcendental theory. Molecule, n. Unit of ultimate, unresolvable problem. It is different from substance, and eventually inseparable substance units. That is that it is close to the atom and is the last, indivisible substance unit. The three scientific theories on the structure of the universe are molecules, particles, and atoms. The fourth person, together with Heckel, confirmed the concentration of the substance precipitated from the ether - its presence was confirmed by condensation of the precipitate. The current trend of scientific thinking is the ion theory. Ions are ions, so they are different from molecules, particles and atoms. The fifth theory is held by idiots, but it is doubtful whether they know this problem better than others.

"The story of two cities" created during the French Revolution was one of Charles Dickens' most beloved masterpieces. The French Revolution was an ideology and political turmoil. According to the principle advocated during enlightenment, the French Revolution struggled for republicanism and citizenship. Unfortunately, the struggle against these freedoms involves confusion, oppression, and atrocity. Initially, the French Revolution opposed the rule of monarchy, unfair advantage, and the resistance of the elite rich public. The soul is completely different from the body, but it still exists in the body and activates it while the body is alive. It combines with a combination of elements of the body. But when the body dissolves and disintegrates and its elements return to the body, the soul does not die. Because of its intelligent and dimensionless nature, the soul remains unanimously, and still depends on all the elements made in the body. Since there is no dimension, the soul does not shrink or spread like a dimension. So there is nothing to prevent the soul from being present with all the natural elements of its predecessor. Therefore, even though it dies, the soul is combined with the elements of the body. What is this sorrow? Why do people have to be afraid of death? twenty four The meaning of epicurus in life rejects immortality and mysticism; there is a soul, but it is as deadly as the body. There is no future life, but people do not need to be afraid of death. Because "death does not mean anything to us, because it does not make sense for us because death does not feel". He founded a school that teaches that living according to reason and virtue is in harmony with the sacred order of the universe. And that is because people understand the signs or rationality of the universe. Everyone. The meaning of life is "no pain" (Gr: απαθεια), that is, objective and "clear judgment" through indifference, not indifferent. Asclepiades accepts the idea that the soul disappears after death, as the soul is made of atoms just like any other part of the body. This is Epicurian instead of Platonic (10, 18, 23). If the belief in the afterlife is denied, the life and health of the body and soul will be the most valuable asset for those who die. Asclepiades expressed the medical treatment of the previous doctor as "preparation for death", but he believes that Mesozical Doctor must help to help people's physical and mental health. Asclepiades of Hippocrates Vicinia of Coase which is the father of clinical medicine and the father of molecular medicine *

Religion and philosophy of the ancient world Buddhism refused to accept the immortal concept of life and God. The founder of Buddhism Siddhartha Gautama is a nobility of India, also known as Buddha or a wise aristocrat. Following the death of Siddhartha, his followers made him the eternal god. Buddhism is the third largest member of faith after Christianity and Islam. This belief is very democratic just like Christianity. No one is excluded. Anyone (male, female, young, old, rich, poor), "four truths" and "eight ways" can be traced. Ancient religion was tolerant, not sectarian. This point is different from the ancient philosophy. As you can read Lucretius, the followers of the philosophy of Epicurus and Stoic experienced a long and intense fight. The reason for this difference in religion and philosophy is that philosophers maintain various realistic propositions for the world - it is made up of 'breath' or atoms - the power to pray, sacrifice Please assume there is. Roman religion did not provide doctrine about the universe, so there were no objections and arguments. On the other hand, philosophers have a well-designed system to protect the last detail with grotesque cleverness. Greek philosophy prospered in every aspect of Hellenistic world, but Greek ancient religion was not. It is more difficult to turn foreigners into Greek religion, focusing on rituals and rituals than a series of beliefs that leads life. As a result, religion of indigenous people such as Judaism and Mithraism prospered. Since 200 BC, the emergence of a new administration in the western part of the Roman Republic symbolized the decline of the Hellenistic kingdom. In the second Punic war, King Antigone unjustly supported Carthagin against Rome. Then Rome and Macedonia fought to make it the state of Rome in 148 BC. Greek city state no longer dominated by Macedonia was absorbed in the state of Rome The philosophy of ancient Greece appeared in the 6th century BC and continued during the era of Hellenistic era and the era when ancient Greece became a part of the Roman Empire. Philosophy is used to understand the world in a non-religious way. It covers a wide range of topics including political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, ontology, logic, biology, rhetoric and aesthetics. Many philosophers around the world believe that the philosophy of Greece has influenced many Western cultures since its founding. Alfred North Whitehead once pointed out: "The most safe general feature of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes by Plato." Early from ancient Greek and Hellenistic philosophers Until the Islamic philosophy, the era of European Renaissance and enlightenment, the line of clear and uninterrupted influence

Opportunities to promote virtue and opportunity advantages and happiness. Happiness has been debated for centuries. What is happiness? What is happiness made of. What contributed to happiness. Among many others, Aristotle, Epicurus, and the famous ancient Greek philosopher Sylena School made a big contribution to this virtue. It is a part of excellence, and it is an opportunity that includes human domination and prediction. All other events may work. Role of Happiness After analyzing the work of these philosophers, people have reached the conclusion that virtue greatly promotes happiness. Regarding the importance of happiness opportunities, Aristotle believes that a happy person is according to virtue "happiness is done best and everything is perfectly harmonized at every event". It is only a few great big unhappies to limit the happiness of such a life, but "beautiful things will shine even in this kind of situation." Aristotle talked about his opinion about the happiness of his generation of the same generation, "It is ruthless and seems to be against the view of a person," he said, "There is absolutely no impact on my descendants and the destiny of all my friends" Stated. "But he said it would seem weak and small if something could pass through the dead, whether it was a good one or not. We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state. Aristotle believes that meditation is the highest realization of happiness. He writes in chapter X.7-8. "It is reasonable to expect that if happiness is consistent with virtue activities, it is reasonable to expect that it will follow the best virtue ... this activity is meditative." The most fruitful activities we can do, It is to bring proper happiness. And in order to be happy, two conditions must be satisfied. First and foremost, a person must be completely kind. Secondly, it needs to be "equipped with foreign currency". Quoting means complete virtue depends on some degree of stability of material comfort. In other words, there are some objective conditions to make other people happy. Aristotle may guess that people believe they need stable shelter, food and friendship.

Plato's view on lies is a lie. When to lie is appropriate. There are two issues to consider after reading the Republic of Plato translated by G.M.A Grube. By definition, a lie is a false statement intended to deceive. Most people will agree that this is not "fair" for your friends. In today's American society, lying is always "bad". Trust is very important, parents always tell their children not to tell lies, otherwise they lose trust. Plato did not agree with what most parents told the children. 1: Plato is the first author with more than 500 pages. He is also considered an inventor of philosophy. "All of philosophy is a footnote of Plato." Plato's rustic view was invented by him. The wise opinion is that he is the depositor of the millennial legend from Greece, Egypt, Syria and other places. Plato effect: The stakeholders look like inventors. It deserves respect. According to the report, Epito, born in Plato, wrote 500 books, was the founder of one of the few ancient philosophy schools and was highly appreciated during the pagan Rome. His book survives at zero. Epicurus is an anti-cultural atheist who despises social status and lives hippies with several friends. Now, the idea of ​​epiculus is conveyed to us through the work of others. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" of the book. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. In the seventh book of the Republic, Socrates talked to Glaucon that he is his interlocutor. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said:

In Thomas Nagel's "death", he asked if death was a bad thing if death was a permanent end of our existence. In addition to dealing with whether death is a bad thing, Nagel is also worried about what people have to fear. He will also explore whether death is evil. Death is defined as permanent death without any form of consciousness and evil is defined as depriving a certain quality or characteristic. In his conclusion he repeated that the conscious being ended with death, and experiences that did not experience death and death ultimately took away his life. The question at the beginning of Thomas Nagel's death is whether "it is bad thing to die if death is a clear and permanent end to our existence". For some people like hedonists, death is not bad. They advocated the idea that people hurt that he had an unpleasant mental state. In addition, hedonicists also believe that people suffer when suffering and injure someone when he or she is alive. Therefore, even if a person dies, that person never gets injured. Death is the end of the theme Epicurus parallel Thomas Nagel believes that without unpleasant evidence it can not mark a particular thing as bad. If death is a bad thing for a person, that is only a bad thing if it makes a real complaint to people. Only when a person has the ability to engage in a conscious experience, something can become positively uncomfortable for people. In other words, this conscious experience feels discomfort. But dead people have no conscious experience. Therefore, death is not a bad thing. Nagel simplifies this sentence as "You can not hurt you if you do not know." In addition, Nagel considers ambiguity about unfortunate subjects. Nagel has decided not to have a subject that can not condemn death because of misfortune. Because, as long as there are people, he will not die, because when he dies he will not exist. Therefore, there is no time to assign "misfortune" of death to that subject. At the undergraduate level, I am a philosophical student, and this famous article by Dr. Thomas Nagel plagues me. "What is a bat", Nagel believes that knowing what it is a question of what it is. Since we do not have bat experience, we certainly do not know how it feels that it is a bat. Only we can understand our experience, others can not understand

The problem bothering Saint Augustine as a youth is the problem that plagues many people today. The problem is as follows. God seems to be the cause of evil. Because he is the Creator of all things. Now that evil is a reality, God seems to be the cause of evil. Although Augustine appears to be logical about this reasoning process, he insists that a good god may be the cause of evil. Among this resistance, he showed much reverence even before he was completely converted. He will not accept the faithful notion that God is the cause of evil. Even if he can not solve the problem, he is still faithful to God. When we ask questions about God, we should remember this. We should not ask this question. Just as we put God in the box of defendant and ask him to explain ourselves to us. Many people are doing this. When they saw how many evil things have happened to the good people they have reached the conclusion that God does not exist or that God does not care. This is a kind devout devout. People should not be addicted to this with honesty and integrity. Even in the worst case, Augustine has never worked this way. I will return to the problem. Augustine did not want to say that God is the cause of evil. Also, I do not want to say that evil is not a reality. From his own experience he reveals that evil is a real factor in his life and the lives of other people. He eventually solved the problem by discovering evil It is a reality to a certain extent, but it is neither a real reality nor a perfect existence. This is a kind of poverty like blindness. Let's review Whether it is blind or vision, this is a big difference for a single human being. But blindness is not a complete reality, not strictly speaking. Totally blind is the lack of quality that should be present in the organs of the eye. In other words, blindness is defects, defects, and imperfections. The lack of this technical name is the word "poverty". Now evil is a sort of poverty. Our human behavior should have been a lack of goodwill. If we do not obey the God's will and do not obey, we will take actions devoid of good wisdom deserving it. Creatures should follow their creator. Then, evil behavior is disorganized, flawed. Here, people are carriers, not gods. Through this solution, St. Augustine maintains the glory of God as a creator of good, while confirming that evil is a reality. It is not a complete reality or existence, but on the contrary, it is a type of poverty, the reason being that person's will. Therefore, human will will eventually cause the moral evil of the world. It is due to the disobedience of Adam and Eve who brought evil to mankind. Through human sin, death is brought to men. Indeed, angels brought evil to the universe by rebelling against God. But their evil did not touch humans until Adam and Eve heard the snake in the garden. Therefore, if you want to oppose the fact that people die of earthquakes and other natural disasters, let's blame men. It is a moral evil of evil that brings physical evil of huge death to the world. The problem of evil was first told by Greek philosopher Epicurus 371 - 270. Since then, many philosophers and theologians have fought against the evil problem on the existence of God. Like the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre 1905-1980, God does not exist. Theodicy is a field of theology dealing with dealing with opposition to the existence of nature and moral evil, defending the quality of God. The sermons of Augustine and Elen sought to prove this by proveing ​​evil of nature. There are two main types of evil, nature and morality, completely different. Natural disasters are natural disasters that occur worldwide. They have no perfect or artificial reasons, and John Hick expresses it as "evil unrelated to human behavior" in the "god of evil and love". Therefore, many people believe that God is the cause of these disasters. Richard Swinburn is "Do you have a god"? ' I agree with Augustine 's logic that free will is the

Happiness and appreciation are two of the most important elements in life. Those who live longer and live a more fulfilling life are not people with perfect lives, but being positive, being able to recover from recession, and as one of the most precious elements of their lives, happiness and appreciation Focus on nurturing. Happiness can also be regarded as a state that can be achieved by achieving a goal or acquiring property (for example, "if you become happy"). We appreciate what we already have What happens Even between all bad things and nervous things, great things happen to us everyday everyday. What we might think as a negative event such as disability, challenge, inequality relationships is actually what we are going to do to help our growth. We all look for the goal of life and realize our dreams. This road is full of wonderful moments, alternating uplift, and difficult situations. It is easy to remember what is not going wrong when it's rugged; we often lack the habit of remembering and tasting the wonderful moments we encounter on our trip. Please challenge this week. Please walk on our way full of happiness and appreciation to enrich our lives. Every week, find something different to appreciate, write it down and share it with others. You can use email, Facebook or Twitter. You can also take pictures of specific places, make your day happy and bright, post on Facebook or Instagram. Do not wait, please start collecting whatever you want in the earliest of the day. You might be surprised that you end up with one or more wonderful things. Through practice, you will better recognize these beautiful things in a day. If you want to further this activity: Start exercises to change frustration and challenge from negative to positive, then thank them. Leaf it UP wrote down what we appreciate and we will meet with us on our social media and get ideas and inspiration. Please tag us thanks to your tweets (# gratitude @ leafitup), Instagram and Facebook (@ leafitup) so that we can get inspired by seeing it "Do not destroy what you have for what you want, remember that what you have now is one of the things you want." - Epicurus Finally, I appreciate useless things. This is relatively easy, thanks to part of the most important and obvious life - happy marriage, healthy children, or living in the USA. But truly happy people will find ways to appreciate their minor things. Think about the unrealistic pleasure of Gerard Manley Hopkins's poem "Pied Beauty". This Thanksgiving Day expresses gratitude only when you feel it. Especially thank you, especially when you can not feel it. Let us recover from happiness, opposed to emotional 'credibility'. I am accepting my own suggestion and updating my thanks list. It includes my family, faith, friends, and work. My bread also has a bird's mottled skin color. Read this column Leaders are seeing what people can do. What does "personal potential" mean? Please think about children in Parkland. Every child has the potential to live a long, healthy, happy and healthy life. In the United States alone, many children do not live long because of guns, shameless politicians and lobbying. Their possibilities have disappeared. This is the simplest human possibility - the length of life. By sticking to this most basic possibility, Parkland children are guiding the people to the highest. However, there are various possibilities such as happiness, safety, trust, intimacy, wisdom. According to the deal, Zach weakens the possibilities of humanity - every time you spend on Facebook, a bit! Let's get the opportunity to live in happiness, warmth, intimacy, and functioning democracy. I hear easy, but it is not so. Do you see people around you? Oh, look - this is the reason to prevent you from becoming a leader.

We all know intelligently that we will die someday, but we usually do not want to think about our death. Therefore, things of this world, such as material wealth, reputation, popularity, sensual pleasure, etc, become important. Therefore, they spend a lot of time and effort to acquire them and perform many negative behaviors against them. Alcohol We are very focused on the attention of this life, in our mind there is not enough space for true spirituality. When truly the time of death came, we found that life ignored death, we are not completely ready What is death? Death is the suspension of our relationship between our mind and body. Most people think that death will occur when the heart stops beating, which means that a person is still dead, as his subtle idea may still remain in his body No. When subtle awareness eventually leaves the body to the next world, death will occur. Our body is like a hotel, our heart is like a guest; when we die, our idea is to leave this body and enter the next reborn body. The mind is neither material nor a byproduct of pure physical processes, it is an invisible continuum, a substance separate from the body. Even if corpses collapse, the mind will not stop. Our superficial consciousness disappears, but it is achieved by incorporating deeper consciousness and a very subtle mind. And the continuity of this very subtle thinking has not begun nor ended. This way of thinking was transformed into the idea of ​​French knowledge after thorough purification. What is death? Death is the end of the connection between the body and the mind. Death occurs not only when the heart stops heartbeat but also when mental consciousness leaves the body and enters the next life. Some people may think that death is a bad thing because it is deprivation of life, but other people may think that death is good as it releases us from life. In my answer I will explore the view of Thomas Nagel's death and answer his article "Death" and present his argument. The death of Thomas Nagel represents the nature of death itself by developing and exploring two different assumptions or places. The first position is that death takes away everything from us in our lives and makes death a little worse. The second position he sought indicates that death is only a stop of all consciousness and existence. At the beginning of the death, Thomas Nagel questioned "If death is a clear and permanent end of our existence, death is a bad thing." For some people like hedonists, death is not bad. They advocated the idea that people are hurt when people have unpleasant mental states. In addition, hedonicists also believe that people suffer when suffering and injure someone when he or she is alive. Therefore, even if a person dies, it will not hurt. Death is the end of the theme In Epicurean 's opinion it is clear that the process of nation and death is not harmful to itself - it is not bad for us. Because death does not necessarily hurt. As a person dies unconsciously, a person can die without pain. However, Epicuras claims not simply saying that death is not necessarily harmful, but claims that death is by no means harmful, according to his criteria it is never a case that death suffers from subjects That is not it. Epicurus may claim that death can not be held responsible for the existence of some condition in us, to indicate that death does not have a material effect on us. It only leads us to no longer condition condition. However, this paper is clearly wrong in the process of "death". Changing from a completely living state to a completely lacking state may bring us a bad situation like pain.

Democritus and his teacher Leucippus replaced the theological and supernatural interpretation of the phenomenon with a materialistic interpretation of nature. They believe that the world is entirely composed of substances and these materials are all visible, a few invisible particles that can be combined to make their nature and behavior . The basic elements of those times - earth, water, air, and fire - are now compounds of sub-elementary particles called atoms (atomic) in the interatomic space or vacuum. Parmenides denies the possibility of voids with false logic and if there is nothing between the two entities they will touch each other. Plato and Aristotle generally prefer the idea that Parmenides consecutively fills the chamber and oppose the atomist theory of discrete particles without separation. Democrats denied the arbitrariness of the phenomenon implied by the free behavior of the gods. He replaced this interpretation with the idea of ​​controlling the deterministic laws of atomic behavior and therefore explained all phenomena of atoms, including humans and their behavior. Leucippus denies that whatever happens randomly (μ άτην), All events in the world are associated with future possibilities in an eternal deterministic causal chain that can be cycled and repeated in the universe 's "great cycle". When denying God and its freedom, Democritus definitely recognized the adverse effects on human liberty and moral responsibility. Does causality document explain that all events are reduced to just what happens without any intention, purpose, and space for human will? Moral responsibility is very important for Democrats. This is an important reason why he eliminated the concept of faith and fate. Unfortunately, the exclusion of the gods is rude and Democritus' work has been avoided by many philosophers, beginning with Socrates and Plato. Nonetheless, his view on atoms and emptiness working through the laws of causality in nature is arbitrary fate and acquisition of the traditional view of God 's fickle, Democritus is merely deterministic responsible enough We insist on offering. In this respect, Democritus seems to have foreseen the semi-compatibility of determinism and moral responsibility. Centuries later, atomistic epiculus added opportunities to break more causal linkage and provide more control and moral responsibility than physical determinism, because in his view Democritus' strictness causality determinism is It is worse than the gods of destiny. At least one person can ask for godly compassion. In the letter to Agnesus, Epicurus said, 134, It is best to follow myths about God so that it does not become a slave of physicist's "fate". The former suggests hope of forgiveness in exchange for honor, but the latter has inevitable inevitability. ... The ancient philosophy was Democritus (5th century BC). Democritus agreed to Parmenides on the impossibility of qualitative change but did not agree on quantitative change. He believes that this change requires mathematical reasoning and is therefore possible. Likewise, Democritus is also ... Democritus physics and cosmology are a well designed, systematic version of his teacher Leucippus. In order to explain the changing physical phenomena of the world, Democritus insists that space or void is considered equivalent and has equivalent rights to reality or existence. He thinks that the gap is a vacuum, an infinite space where numerous atoms (the physical world) that make up the exist are moving. Epicuras made major changes to the theory of atomic physics. Some of it goes back to criticism against Aristotle's democritus. It seems that Democritus does not properly distinguish between the impercutability of atoms and the atomicity of those concepts. This raises questions as to how the atoms have parts, as evidenced by the ability to shape changes in shape and size of atoms. As such, they are in contact with each other in a different series. Although Epicura disting

It is widely believed that the problem of evil is the most unfavorable problem for monotheists. This is also the main opposition to the existence of God as a whole. It is easy to understand this question. If God is a perfect omnipotent omnipotent god, why do we live in the imperfections and denial worlds? Why bad things happen? Especially for the good people of the world and for millions of innocent people suffering every day. Gottfreid Leibniz is a philosopher who aims at this problem and wants to point out that evil and the existence of God are compatibility of evil. (1) if God is all-powerful and all-intelligence Since many defenders believe this is a convincing and reasonable criticism of preaching, the problem of evil against religion is rare. Therefore, it is often thought that the problem of evil is one of the greatest threats to religious beliefs, and many religious writers compete for various solutions. "If a single drop of pain taken while looking for an almighty benevolent God's signature is used to gather evidence to darken the creator's role, what range can not be seen in the animal kingdom Devourer and Devourer, most creatures are equipped with prey-tormenting tools There was discussion on Karma theory and how it answers questions of evil and theoretical problems related to it. The problem of evil is an important issue in monotheism and there are two beliefs: (1) there is a god who is absolutely kind and considerate (whole circumference), (2) God absolutely knows everything (no ) I do not know) and they are all powerful (all omnipotent). Then the problem of evil is stated in a statement like "Why are you aware of in the whole world, omnipotence can bring evil and suffering to God?" Max Weber extends evil problems to the oriental tradition Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. David Hume cited Epicuras in his dialogue on natural religion (1779) to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but he is helpless. Do you have both abilities and intentions, then bad guys, can not he also help? So why do you call him a god? For example, a personal Christian god is logically inconsistent These atheists propose deductive arguments against the existence of God God is a person who is aware of integrity, creative status, immutability, omniscience, versatility, versatility, transcendence, personality (Individual) Does not exist, Unnecessary, Justice, and Mercy