Aristotle's Notion on Eudaimonia and Virtue

Aristotle's "Nicmaco Ethics" thinks that humans should sacrifice and ultimately aim for their own happiness. In this paper I assert that my best interests are good. First, I will explain the concept of Aristotle's Udaimonia and virtue and then emphasize the intimacy of both. Next, I will talk about the role of human beings in society. Third, I will explain the essential connection of human behavior.

The story of Aristotle is detailed in Nicomachean Ethics and Eudemian Ethics. In a nutshell, for Aristotle, eudaimonia is involved in the activity and shows virtue (sometimes translated as excellent) on grounds. This concept of Udaimonia comes from the fact that Aristotle understands the essentialism of the essence of human beings, and thinks the reason (which may be translated as a reason mark) is a human viewpoint It is. Or a perfect sport. The reason is that basically happiness (eudaimonia) is obtained by appropriately developing their highest and most human capabilities. Therefore, human eudaimonia is a reasonable achievement (areté)

Aristotle's ethical theory is eudaimonist as it claims that eudaimonia is dependent on virtue. But Aristotle's clear view is that virtue is necessary, but it is not enough for Jews. While emphasizing the importance of spiritual rationality, he did not ignore the importance of other "goods" such as friends, wealth, power, which is a voluntary life. If a person lacks a particular foreign item such as "good birth, good child, beautiful", he doubts whether it is possible that it is eudaimonic. Therefore, ugly, or "Death of a dead child or best friend" (1099b 5 - 6), or an isolated person will never become eudaimon. In this way, "coincidentally" and "silly luck" can make a person fall into eudaimonia.

The important difference between Ermonism and Plato and Aristotle in Epicura is that the latter virtue is part of eudaimonia and Epicross is to make virtue a means of happiness. Let's consider Aristotle's theory about this difference. Aristotle believes that eudaimonia is what everyone wants (and Epicurus will also agree). He also believes that eudaimonia is best performing benign activities according to reason. Good people think they are willing to do the right thing for the right moral and intelligent features (see eg Nicomachean Ethics 1099a 5). However, Aristotle does not believe pursuing benign activities for happiness. Happiness is a by-product of benign behavior: it simply does not cause good behavior. Aristotle does not believe that we are targeting eudaimonia. Virtue is the greatest part of eudaimon's life.