All the wonderful things in life begin with people who can not imagine. Who was thinking that social studies constitute something or become an important part of people's lives? In the latter half of the 19th century people thought was very small, even if you did not care about the outside world. People know things will happen in their society, but they never know the reason they do not know whether they will be willing to find it. Society is managed by religion and they are not questioned. Do you know one of the main reasons for Emil Dürkem, one of the founders of sociology? We can not manage suicide cases in Western Europe. Why do people commit suicide? Without the help of a long tradition of humanities science, you can not answer this question. Durkheim claims that several causes are considered, but the most important reason is "missing". In the era of Durchem, the state of losing the sense of life during the change of the large structural institution was the rapid development of division of labor. It is not complete. Emir Durchem, sister's father, groups solidarity into two categories: mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity means that collective bonds arise from homogeneity of members, they are linked through common similarities such as their work, identity, lifestyle, etc. Organic solidarity is a mutual interaction of various occupations How does unity and differences arising from dependency complement people? Emile Dürkem was born on Epinal of the Vosges in Lorraine, France on April 15, 1858. Durkheim considers most people to be the father of sociology. He commended the science of sociology. During the lifetime of Durchem, he published numerous sociological studies on suicide, religion, and other aspects of society, and provided many lectures. Emile Durkheim (2002). Haralambos & Holborn (2004): All functionalists have agreed that the control mechanisms such as courts and police are required to control crime, control deviance and protect the social order. However, many functionalists believe that some prejudice can play a positive role in society, and they believe that crime can bring about maintenance and even social well-being. In "Sociology Method Rules" (1938) by Emile Durkheim, crime is inevitable and is considered to be a normal part of social life. Emile Durkheim believes that crime exists in all sorts of societies

Emile Durkheim is a French theorist who is focusing on various aspects of human beings, including suicide. He proposed four different forms of ego: selfishism, altruism, unnaturalness, and deadly. He pointed out that suicide is always a death-preference action rather than life, but different reasons for each form of suicide are the cause of this desire for this person to take a life (Applerouth 133). It seems unreasonable that the theory advocated in the late 1800s still applies to this age. Book Review of "Suicide" by Emile Durchem About one century ago, French sociologist Emile Durkem became interested in suicide. He asked why people committed suicide. In his era, the general answer to this question was suffering an unbearable loss, whether the suicide was down or psychotic. Another philosophical answer has also been raised: Because it is part of his personality, people commit suicide. However, Durchem is not satisfied with these explanations. Emil Dürkem's suicide theory: "All forms of death affect society regardless of the execution of the death penalty, disaster, cruel murder or suicide, especially witnesses can stimulate a lot of emotions. (44, Sociology of the changing world) suicide bombing terrorism and suicide terrorism are effective means of politically and psychologically damaging society and culture around the world - analyze and interpret texts and events in sociology There are many different ways in which the three main ideas used by sociologists symbolize functionalism, interaction and conflict theory, each of these theoretical perspectives has its own unique identity there is Emil Dülkem (1858-1917) is the largest philosopher and sociologist in France and is recognized today as a father of sociology. Durkheim conducted various investigations in various fields such as labor, suicide, and religion. His four main works are as follows. "Social Work Section (Social Work Section)", "Religion of Leo Formum Primary" ("Basic Form of Religious Life", "Sociological Methodology" and "Suicide: Sociological Studies" Randall (1975) I believe it is the first person to use empirical methods in the field (Randall, 1975).

"The daughter of a Mexican official closes the restaurant because she does not have the table you want" has the opportunity to explore the current events in Mexican society and the influences you are seeing through social media through the eyes of Karl . Marx and Emile Durchem. We will focus on Karl Marx's theory of capitalist conflict and Emile Durchem's dynamic density structural functional theory. These two theories are still relevant today, there is a correlation between the influence of social media to ego self-state and altruism in current society. Social theorists such as history, Emil Durchem and Carl Marx challenged aspects of social structure in their research. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist and states that everything is functioning in society, his biggest concern is to discover this function. Conflict theorist Karl Marx, on the other hand, emphasized that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict leading to social change. Both Durkheim and Marx pay attention to the characteristics of the group. Comparing Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber's ideology are three historical sociologists. Their views have become world famous and have shaped many ways to explain the social structure of many contemporary societies. In this article, we can glimpse the ideal of three sociologists and also clarify possible similarities and differences. Karl Marx's social outlook is based on economics. All other social structures of Marx, such as religion, family values, politics, are rooted in the foundation and the economy. In Marcus' sociological view, religion does not work at all. He is called an atheist. He believes that religion is nothing but a burden to society. "... more content

West Coast Blues and Route Festival (WCBR) The importance of deep experience of music is the subject of this chapter. This chapter will clarify the importance of WCBR music experience by using sociologist Emile Dülkem, theologians Friedrich Schliermach and Rudolf Otto work. One of the most controversial and useful concepts of Durkheim is collective foaming. This chapter outlines three examples that can be used to explain and clarify the deep experience of WCBR music. This phenomenological analysis includes sketches by contributions of each philosopher. In this chapter, we introduce some examples of ethnographic magazine based on observation by WCBR participants. Also, we will outline the usefulness of Schleiermacher and the conceptual intuition of the universe in case of an unusual sound. It is necessary to distinguish between religious systems of doctrine and practice that develop around these intuition and primitive religious phenomena. In Western thought, Friedrich Schliermach, Rudolf Otto and William James all talk about religious experiences (mainly theological experiences). Schleiermac believes that the distinguishing feature of religious experience is that "people are overcome by the sense of absolute dependence." At the same time, although this is an important factor, the most fundamental characteristic of religious experience is that it is boring. He explained this as "unreasonable, non-sensory experiences and emotions, its main purpose and direct purpose are outside of self", and also strangely and terrifyingly attractive qualities. West Coast Blues and Route Festival (WCBR) The importance of deep experience of music is the subject of this chapter. This chapter will clarify the importance of WCBR music experience by using sociologist Emile Dülkem, theologians Friedrich Schliermach and Rudolf Otto work. One of the most controversial and useful concepts of Durkheim is collective foaming. This chapter outlines three examples that can be used to explain and clarify the deep experience of WCBR music. This phenomenological analysis includes sketches by contributions of each philosopher. In this chapter, we introduce some examples of ethnographic magazine based on observation by WCBR participants. Also, we will outline the usefulness of Schleiermacher and the conceptual intuition of the universe in case of an unusual sound. It is necessary to distinguish between religious systems of doctrine and practice that develop around these intuition and primitive religious phenomena. Key words: collective foaming, Emile Durchem, Friedrich Schliermach, primitive religious phenomenon, Rudolf Otto, WCBR Otto's first mentor instructed him to investigate specific features of religious correspondence by famous German philosopher and theologian Friedrich Schliermach. This is an early work by Schleiermacher, especially his book "ÜberdieReligion". Otto pays special attention (1799; about religion: speech to cultural ghosts). What attracted him with this work is Schleicher 's religious view as a unique, not exclusive, emotional or conscious, different from moral and rational perception. Shria Machher later called this unique emotion as a man's "absolute dependence". Otto was impressed with this word and said that Schleicher had rediscovered the sanctity of the time after the enlightenment. Because of "absolute dependence" Otto replaced "biological sensation". Biological sensation, he said,

West Coast Blues and Route Festival (WCBR) The importance of deep experience of music is the subject of this chapter. This chapter will clarify the importance of WCBR music experience by using sociologist Emile Dülkem, theologians Friedrich Schliermach and Rudolf Otto work. One of the most controversial and useful concepts of Durkheim is collective foaming. This chapter outlines three examples that can be used to explain and clarify the deep experience of WCBR music. This phenomenological analysis includes sketches by contributions of each philosopher. In this chapter, we introduce some examples of ethnographic magazine based on observation by WCBR participants. Also, we will outline the usefulness of Schleiermacher and the conceptual intuition of the universe in case of an unusual sound. It is necessary to distinguish between religious systems of doctrine and practice that develop around these intuition and primitive religious phenomena. In Western thought, Friedrich Schliermach, Rudolf Otto and William James all talk about religious experiences (mainly theological experiences). Schleiermac believes that the distinguishing feature of religious experience is that "people are overcome by the sense of absolute dependence." At the same time, although this is an important factor, the most fundamental characteristic of religious experience is that it is boring. He explained this as "unreasonable, non-sensory experiences and emotions, its main purpose and direct purpose are outside of self", and also strangely and terrifyingly attractive qualities. West Coast Blues and Route Festival (WCBR) The importance of deep experience of music is the subject of this chapter. This chapter will clarify the importance of WCBR music experience by using sociologist Emile Dülkem, theologians Friedrich Schliermach and Rudolf Otto work. One of the most controversial and useful concepts of Durkheim is collective foaming. This chapter outlines three examples that can be used to explain and clarify the deep experience of WCBR music. This phenomenological analysis includes sketches by contributions of each philosopher. In this chapter, we introduce some examples of ethnographic magazine based on observation by WCBR participants. Also, we will outline the usefulness of Schleiermacher and the conceptual intuition of the universe in case of an unusual sound. It is necessary to distinguish between religious systems of doctrine and practice that develop around these intuition and primitive religious phenomena. Key words: collective foaming, Emile Durchem, Friedrich Schliermach, primitive religious phenomenon, Rudolf Otto, WCBR Otto's first mentor instructed him to investigate specific features of religious correspondence by famous German philosopher and theologian Friedrich Schliermach. This is an early work by Schleiermacher, especially his book "ÜberdieReligion". Otto pays special attention (1799; about religion: speech to cultural ghosts). What attracted him with this work is Schleicher 's religious view as a unique, not exclusive, emotional or conscious, different from moral and rational perception. Shria Machher later called this unique emotion as a man's "absolute dependence". Otto was impressed with this word and said that Schleicher had rediscovered the sanctity of the time after the enlightenment. Because of "absolute dependence" Otto replaced "biological sensation". Biological sensation, he said,

French sociologist Emil Durchem was the first person to conceptualize deviations of today's theorists who generally accepted his theory as a functionalist deviation theory. Norm theory believes that value is used to determine what a particular society or individual is right, wrong and important in life. (Roach Anieu 45) They are potential preferences to guide our life choice. Hensling (50) defines value as what people defined as ideal or unpopular, good or bad, beautiful or ugly criteria. Actions that accept that a particular individual, group, or society lives in these values ​​is called a norm. "Normative theory" in literature This article follows the basic argument of the theory that the purpose of social ceremonies is to build a community for French great sociologist Emile Durchem. EMILE DURKHEIM, rules for sociological method (S. Solovay & J. Muller trans.8th ed. 1938). Thurman Arnold seems to be the first legal scholar who applied this concept to a trial as a social ceremony: the judicial trial was thus an example of a series of targeted courses. This is not an extortion, but a way to train society with a correct way of thinking and action through a metaphor of spontaneous interpretation and follow-up. . . As evidenced by the work of Emile Durkheim, Pierre Bourdieu, and more recently by John W. Meyer, theorists have long discussed the value of education in society. Emile Durkheim believes in the ability to provide structural functionalism and social order. Dürkem feels this system is a social fact that enables social machines to operate in an orderly manner. Education as an educational institution has a set of standard rules recognized by individuals. - I have to establish a united fight with the government, the ASB director and the ASB executive committee. We held a meeting and spent a lot of time planning for homecoming. Overcoming my satisfaction with the executive committee is the challenge I encountered when working with members to create a dialogue for problem solving. Finally, we have a viable plan to let the boss "closed" when my boss returns home within two weeks. A new plan began and it was finally approved

Emile Dürkem's study Emile Durchem established a functional methodology of social phenomena and research on "social facts". The principle behind the majority of Durkheim's work is conceptualized by society's analogy, like a human organism. Among them, it is a system or whole consisting of interrelated parts, all of which are necessary and interdependent work to achieve the best function. Therefore, he is interested in the influence of the history of division of labor on society. The structural and functional ways of religion derive from the religious work of Emile Durchem. Durkheim believes that religion is a celebration of human society in a sense, even even (worship) of self. According to this method, Durkheim suggests that religion has three major functions in society. It provides social cohesion through common rituals and beliefs and enforces religious ethics and norms through social control to help maintain social integration and control. And it provides meaning and purpose to answer questions. In addition, Dürkem sets himself as a positivistic tradition, which means he believes his research about society is calm and scientific. He is deeply interested in the problem of putting together a complicated contemporary society. He believes religion is an expression of social unity Social theorists such as history, Emil Durchem and Carl Marx challenged aspects of social structure in their research. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist and states that everything is functioning in society, his biggest concern is to discover this function. Conflict theorist Karl Marx, on the other hand, emphasized that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict leading to social change. Both Durkheim and Marx pay attention to the characteristics of the group. In this short sentence we will introduce the various social transformation methods described by Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim. This will introduce a brief introduction about their life and will familiarize themselves with some of their main works. Next, I compare contrast between Marx and Durchem 's modern social structure theory. Next, there are criticisms of two theorists, and finally it ends with a small conclusion of this article. Durkheim was born in Lorraine in the eastern part of France. He is considered a "father" of contemporary sociology. He has been educated in France and Germany and has taught social science at the University of Bordeaux (initially offered by the French university) and the famous French Sorbonne University. Durkheim considers the collective conscience of society to be the source of religion and morality The most fundamental value of social development, especially primitive society is a strong connection of social order.

Durkheim's Sociological Studies "Although some studies may be closer, Durkheim's research continues to be the most important sociological analysis of suicide in modern society." Sociological arguments and evidence suggest that this argument Evaluate the range to support. Regarding suicide, it seems more realistic to deal with subjects as personal and individual actions that seem to be more suitable for psychologists to explain, but this seems not to be an obvious discipline for sociologists . In short, this article explores Durkheim's main research in sociology. As one of the founders of professional sociology, Durkheim revealed social facts and established the dimension and skeleton of sociology. Based on previous research, he developed a systematic approach to discover social law by observing and comparing relationships between different variables. Durchem also applied his method and theory to his "division of labor" and "suicide" work. He discovered the process of integrating social society into society and offered various types to explain the relationship between people and society. In spite of ambiguous explanations of concepts and relevance, Durkheim's research is considered important for scientific research in society. Durkheim (1858-1917) is devoted to scientific research of sociology and is widely regarded as a pioneer of French sociology. As we all know, Emile Durkheim inherited some of Auguste Conto and Herbert Spencer's views and developed a systematic sociology with theory and methodology (Mo & ntilde; ivas, 2007, p.18) . However, some of his work has been questioned and criticized. In order to carefully study the contribution of Emile Durchem to social science research, one should consider Durkheim's groundbreaking research including division of labor (1893), sociological method rules (1895) and suicide (1897) is. All of these reflect topics about individualism and new social rules of modern industrial society (Barnes, 1920, p. 4). In this article, we first explain the concept of Durkheim's social facts. This is based on sociology as a basic concept. In addition, restrictions are mentioned when reviewing his work. Emile Durkheim develops sociology into independent fields and science. Durkheim developed the concept of functionalism and maintained the unity of culture and society through interaction (Ferrante, 2007). His most famous work is division of labor in society, which shows how social order is maintained in society through economic regulation. Durkheim considers sociology to be a study of social facts. He feels that thoughts, emotions and actions of people occur outside of personal consciousness. This belief created Durkheim with social facts, a relationship linking people, so-called unity. He noticed that people's relationships changed dramatically as the degree of industrialization increased. He believes it is necessary to analyze and explain the mechanisms that form solidarity. In his writings he became infatuated with the tied up relationship and appears in his popular work "suicide"

Emile Dülkem: suicide as a social fact Leslie-Ann Bolden, Michela Bowman, Sarah Kaufman and Danielle Lindemann The joy of all people who do their best, act and exercise means that his efforts are not in vain, and he made progress through walking. However, if a person does not achieve the goal, we can not move forward. Or, if the target is infinite, this is the same thing (suicide, 248). Quote: Emile Durchem. Sociological Methodology Cross W. D. Hole New York: Simon & Schuster, 1982. Emile Durchem. Suicide: Sociological research. Cross John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: Macmillan, 1979 In this regard, Durkheim claims that "Science provides a means to create them by revealing the cause of social phenomena" (Durkheim, 1964: 48). This helps to determine which is good and which is not related to society in order to derive the causes and consequences of scientific research and social phenomena, and those that are functional and nonfunctional. Then you can rebuild the social order. Thus according to Durkheim, science is a matter of fact, according to the light of science, we can heal a sick society (Durgan, 1964: 55-57). The difference in natural science is not due to differences in their methodology but rather the power of social sciences "fulfilling roles in every social construction plan" (Westby, 1991: 263) and "creating a more sustainable social structure" (Freund). , 1968: 12) For Durchem, "All sociological phenomena (and biological phenomena) can take different forms in different situations, while preserving basic characteristics" (Durgan, 1964: 55) To be able to be in society To achieve objectivity in academic research. In other words, he used comparative methods for social analysis like Weber (Durkheim, 1964: Ch. 6), social phenomena are not unique and are universal due to the objectivity of social facts Durkheim thinks. And Weber emphasizes the uniqueness of historical facts, but the methodology to understand social facts can also be applied to other facts (Mü45, 1988: 21). Durkheim uses this term to refer to the existence of society itself, not to the "phenomenon" underlying that form. Society is not just an aggregate for Durchem. Between individuals. Society exists as its own entity, keeps its own rules, and exercises its own influence. "The crucial cause of social facts should be sought for social facts before and after it, not individual state of consciousness" (Durgan, 1895/1938, page 110, highlighting the original text.) Durkheim Let me give an example of what it means when it says that.

David Emil Durkheim is a famous sociologist and professor of sociology at the beginning of France. He was born in France on April 15 and insisted that sociology is recognized as an academic discipline. In 1893 he completed his first identifiable work called "social division of labor" and then opened the first European sociology department in his hometown of France. The main focus of David Durkheim is to understand how the community maintains its integrity and consistency in modern times where general religious and ethnic backgrounds are hindering. Book Review of "Suicide" by Emile Durchem About one century ago, French sociologist Emile Durkem became interested in suicide. He asked why people committed suicide. In his era, the general answer to this question was suffering an unbearable loss, whether the suicide was down or psychotic. Another philosophical answer has also been raised: Because it is part of his personality, people commit suicide. However, Durchem is not satisfied with these explanations. Emile Dürkem pointed out that suicide rates in European countries seemed to rise further during the political difficulties of 1848. Emile Durkheim recognizes that the suicide rate may be related to social stability and social integration. Using this theory Emile Durkheim used different data sets, mainly from European countries. Observing suicide rates in various countries in Europe, he noticed the difference in their situation, but began to notice patterns. Most countries with Protestant religion have higher suicide rates than Catholic countries. There are 190 suicides per million in major Protestant countries. These figures are compared with Protestant and Catholic mixed faith countries. There are 58 suicides per million in major Catholic countries. He pointed out that Prussia's suicide rate is higher than Bavaria Emile Durchem (1858-1917) is one of the pioneers of sociology and he showed that social power can play a role even in strong personal behaviors such as suicide. Applying Durkheim's logic, you can see that the higher the suicide rate of white men and men, the higher the freedom of wealth and freedom. As Durkheim did a century ago, we can see a general sociological pattern in the personal behavior of a particular individual. The times of change and crisis will encourage everyone to feel somewhat imbalanced and use a sociological point of view. Sociologist C. Wright Mills (1959) used the Great Depression of 1930 to explain this point. When the unemployment rate soared to 25%, people can not see general social forces working in their particular life.

Emile Dürkem is widely regarded as a person who science sociology. In juvenile, he was pleased with the scientific attitude of society, but at the time there was no social science course. By swearing to change this, Durchem worked hard to gain his "degree of philosophy of 1882". (Johnson 34) Emil quickly could not change the French school system so he visited Germany to continue his education. He published his preliminary findings there and gained the necessary knowledge to influence the French education system. Durkheim is interested in the four main aspects of society: (1) why society is formed and they become one, (2) religion, (3) suicide, and (4) deviation and crime. Durchem took notice of him for the first time in his book "Social Work Division". Dürkem said that division of labor in all societies is obvious and wishes to know the reason. Durkheim's answer to this question can be seen in his "unity" thinking. In an older, more primitive society, Durchem says "mechanical unity connects everyone, the mechanical unification here means that everyone is doing a relatively similar work, for example, hunting At meetings. Division of labor is not so many, people are chasing and gathering Durkheim thinks theoretically shared values, common symbols, exchange systems play a close role in these societies. The core of Durkheim's theory is to maintain social moral standards through social solidarity. Unlike Marx, Marx believes that social division of labor is rooted in conflict between economic classes rather than ownership of production means. Durchem wrote two main forms of social solidarity: mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity is what Durkheim saw in "traditional" society. Traditional societies are inherently much smaller and are characterized by mechanical solidarity as they are not enough to maintain a highly specialized division of labor. Because the division of labor is governed by the collective responsibility and collective interests of labor, mechanical solidarity is a perception of an individual's collective traditional society. Organic solidarity is the result of social evolution, leading to complex division of division of labor, beliefs, and background. Durukem does not necessarily think that division of labor is a bad thing, but thinks that collective consciousness, norms, concepts of community, social constraints will weaken if society evolves too early, which will lead to social confusion. In the case of abnormalities (Durkheim 1983) Durkheim is more realistic in his division of labor. I am firmly arguing that it is neither too pessimistic nor too optimistic

In this article I will explain the concept of social integration and social / ethical norms of Emile Durchem and explain how Durchem combines them with suicide. Then use these concepts to analyze the social impact of the Buffalo Creek flood, as explained in Kai T. Erikson's book "Everything is in the Direction", which explains the high suicide rate. Other results than others. Durkheim's concept of social integration refers to a social group with well-defined values, traditions, norms and goals. To understand how the concept of Durkheim is applied to the disaster of Buffalo Creek, you first need to understand something about Buffalo Creek in West Virginia. Prior to the 1972 earthquake, Buffalo Creek was a typical coal mine community with about 5,000 people. This situation has changed over the years, the population rising and falling with the periodic coal boom and the population actually increased to two to three times the current size of 1972. Most of people going in and out are temporary shortly after work. However, among the people who left there are people living throughout the life, and "There are more young people growing in this area" (23) The reasons they leave are the reasons for all young people leaving this type of community Is the same. Therefore, before the flood on February 26, 1972, residents of Buffalo Creek received a very high level of social integration and social supervision. On February 26, 1972, the coffee mine community of Buffalo Creek, West Virginia suffered a disaster. "Reservoir" - in practice the dam - was built as a treatment plant for slag and on the central fork of Creek as a narrow place to clean the 4,000 tons needed to clean 4,000 tons of water Part of gallons, and theoretically purify coal every day. The 26th session at 7:59 am. The dam collapsed and 132 million gallons of black water roared in the sky. It began as a "mud wave", picked up the building along the way, turned into a "striking ram" of railroad cramping and rides, and sometimes 20 feet high, killed 132 people. 7 bodies were not found, 3 children had to fill in anonymously because they broke. Some people say that they can not distinguish one another from their bodies with no head.

In "Fatal List" written by Isaac Bashevis Singer, the irony of the speech and context is used to emphasize Benjamin Schwartz 's (destiny) fate and previous destiny. Strange views point out the absurdity of deadly acts in various ways. Some characters are using the irony of words to mock a nearly deadly fatalist about pre-marriage views. Situational cynicism gives us an amazing ending and is finally used in the "deadly list" to overturn our initial fate view. The main purpose of a singer's satire in 'flesh out' is inconsistent with our previous view on certain events in the story and gives us a new perspective through irony or simply an old mismatch It is that. Suicide is a suicide discovered by Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), which occurs under social conditions where individuals experience extensive repression. Durkheim 's deadly definition of suicide is due to' excessive regulation ', its' passion is severely restricted by repressive discipline' and its symmetry aim. The role of contemporary urban life is to increase the incidence of suicide and Durchem will weaken his center's claim that social integration has never seriously studied the possibility of leading to suicide. Durchem considers selfish suicide as a result of worsening of social and family relations and combines suicide, disillusionment and disappointment of the atomic bomb. Durkheim can be divided into egoism, meaninglessness, altruism, and fatalism These classifications reflect the general human behavior theory at the time. Durchem thinks suicide by altruism and lethalism is not important. In some societies, "excessive personalization can lead to suicide." From the perspective of others, 'personalization will bring the same effect' Dürkem's conclusion is based on a statistical comparison of suicide rates of European Catholics, Protestants, Jews at the end of the 19th century. Durkheim drew four different types of ego: egoism, naturalism, altruism, and fatalism. All these things in common are that they represent individual bias toward social adaptation. In his view, psychological problems are the result of these missed adaptations, so suicide should be understood from a social point of view rather than a psychological point of view. Through job roles, families and relationships with local communities, people often blend into society. Durkheim considers selfish suicide as a result of modernization of society. And I often feel that people do not belong to the community or they are not consolidating. This can lead to emotions of meaninglessness, indifference, depression and depression. On the contrary, the traditional society is characterized by a more advanced integration and a stronger social bond.

French structural anthropology developed from the 19th century to the 20th century and was formed by many famous theorists, sociologists and anthropologists. These influences lead to structural Marxist theory and the ideological processes involved continued to influence modern anthropological studies. Emile Durkheim is grateful for classical cultural anthropology that has never been occupied in France. The identity of French anthropology is not a natural departure from its heritage of the 19th century, it is a continuation of the previous theory. In the 1960s and 1970s, Edmund Reich and his students, Mary Douglas and Nur Yalman, introduced French structuralism in the style of Levi-Strauss. Although British anthropology continues to emphasize social organization and economics rather than purely symbolic or literary themes, the differences between social and cultural anthropology in the UK, France, and the USA are dialogue and reference As the theory and method increase, it decreases. Today British social anthropology is in contact with many other social theories internationally and has developed in many ways. French structural anthropology developed from the 19th century to the 20th century and was formed by many famous theorists, sociologists and anthropologists. These influences lead to structural Marxist theory and the ideological processes involved continued to influence modern anthropological studies. Emile Durkheim is grateful for classical cultural anthropology that has never been occupied in France. - Franz Boas is considered a "father of American anthropology" to many people because it is a pioneer breaking American isolationism, intolerance and false alarm, and biodiversity and linguistics. The early idea of ​​Boas, born in Minden, Westfalen, Germany, born in 1858 from a Jewish family, was based on the ideal of the German Revolution in 1848 and followed his intellectual freedom of his parents ( Stocking, 1974)

Dr. Alpert, social theory bibliography, Harry. Emile Dülkem and Its Sociology New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1961. Douglas F. Durchem through the challenger Aristotle's lens. Maryland Lanham: Roman and Littlefield Press. 1994 Dürlhem, Emile. Social division of labor New York: Freedom News. 1933. Elliott, Anthony. Modern social theory Malden, MA: Blackwell Press. 1999. Gain, Mike. Radical sociology of Durkheim and Moss In this article I will explain the two social theories of social structure and social process. It will also cover some branches of these theories; collapse theory, strain theory, cultural prejudice, social learning theory, social control theory, and social reaction theory. It will cover several branches and ideas among these sub theories; differential correlation theory, neutralization theory, neutralization technique and social relation theory. It will also study how these theories are trying to explain the phenomenon of gang violence. Social learning theory is a theory that explains the socialization and its impact on self-development. There are many different theories that explain how people become social, such as psychoanalysis theory, functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interaction theory. Like other people, social learning theory focuses on the social impact on individual learning process, self-organization, and individual socialization. Social learning theory believes that the formation of human identity is a learning response to social stimulation. It emphasizes the social context of socialization rather than personal thought. The theory assumes that the identity of an individual is not the unconscious product (such as the belief of the psychoanalyst theory) but the result of self-imitation that meets the expectations of others. The development of behavior and attitudes is to respond to the strengthening and encouragement of people around us. In social psychology social identity theory studies the interaction between individuals and social identity. Social identity theory is aimed at specifying and predicting how individuals view themselves as individuals or groups of members. The theory also takes into account the impact of personal and social identity on individual perceptions and collective behavior. The theory of social identity evolved from a series of studies (often referred to as minimal group studies) conducted by British social psychologist Henri Tajfel and colleagues in the early 1970s. Participants are assigned to groups designed to be as arbitrary and meaningless as possible. However, if you are asked to assign a score to another research participant, you will be given more systematic points to the members of the group than members outside the group.

Historical Leader: Karl Marx Karl Marx is one of the greatest historical leaders through his revolutionary philosophical thinking and transformational leadership. Please investigate his revolutionary work in the 19th century German and British writings. Marx was the biggest leader in history as it linked philosophical theory to activities and social revolutionary changes. Through revolutionary social change and the way society operates, Marx is the leader of change. Historical materialism is a methodological method of social, economic and historical research first described by Karl Marx. His fundamental proposition on historical materialism can be summarized as follows. It is not a human consciousness to decide its existence, it is a social being to decide its consciousness. - Karl Marx, "Contribution to Criticism of Political Economy" Introduction Historical materialism pursues the cause of human social development and change so that humans jointly create a lifestyle, Emphasizing the coexistence of economic foundations. , Political structure, ideology) Comparing Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber's ideology are three historical sociologists. Their views have become world famous and have shaped many ways to explain the social structure of many contemporary societies. In this article, we can glimpse the ideal of three sociologists and also clarify possible similarities and differences. Karl Marx's social outlook is based on economics. All other social structures of Marx, such as religion, family values, politics, are rooted in the foundation and the economy. In Marcus' sociological view, religion does not work at all. He is called an atheist. He believes that religion is nothing but a burden to society. "... more content Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 in the Trier town of Rhineland. His parents are Jews, and there are many respected rabbis on both sides of the house. But in order to comply with the legal career in the Kingdom of Prussia at the time, Karl Marx 's father turned to Protestantism, Karl himself religious training was limited, and when he was very young he was all about the best existence I rejected my belief. After studying in Bonn for a while, he transferred to the University of Berlin to obtain a doctorate. However, he is generally a lazy student without money. His father sent money for university tuition fees on food and drinks, he spent many nights while drinking in a cafe or tavern, insisting Hegelian philosophy with other students. He finally obtained his doctorate by submitting his thesis to Jena University in East Germany.

Scarlet Letter Arthur Dimmesdale's pastor Arthur Dimmesdale was the protagonist of Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel "The Scarlet Letter", who committed adultery with Hester Prine, proved to be a sinner against God. Children's pearl The sin that he ultimately paid for death was proved to be more harmful and destructive than sin of the flesh and sin against God. Socrates said, "I know," Shakespeare said, "You are true" If Pastor Din Messleder is faithful to himself, he certainly will not suffer as much as he does. Imprisonment is defined as putting entities in compulsory detention. Hester Prynne and pastor Arthur Dimmesdale are living a free and uniform life with Nathariel Hawthorne 's "The Scarlet Letter", with the servants of Bernarda and the daughter of "The House of Bernarda Alba" of Federico Garcia Lorca. As proof by imprisonment - Emile Durkheim, Pierre Bourdieu, and recently by John W. Meyer, theorists have long discussed the value of education in society. Emile Durkheim believes in the ability to provide structural functionalism and social order. Dürkem feels this system is a social fact that enables social machines to operate in an orderly manner. Education as an institution has a set of standard rules recognized by individuals. In the novel "The Scarlet Letter" by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Arthur Dimmesdale is a person fighting between two desires. The fight between Arthur Dimmesdale's sense of responsibility and enthusiasm for lovers creates two compelling powers that are putting him in danger of crazy and tragic death. When I showed the pain that Arthur had to experience and compared it with his decision making a decision between the two wishes, he found a lonely island in the rebellious sea. But there are things that separate her from other children; she is a result of terrible sin, adultery. Since she was born, pearls have been regarded as social abandoned things. She is intertwined with a network of lies and secrets, and she only wants to know the truth of her identity. Jenny, Nathaniel Hawthorn, pearl, born Arthur Dimmesdale is Puritan Pastor of Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel The Scarlet Letter. He was dyed by Hester and later became a father of pearls. As the novel progresses, the true character of Ding Mesdale is revealed, and the reader follows his life for several years. Hawthorne used many symbolic meanings to establish the characteristics of Arthur Dimmesdale. The most important symbol related to Dimmesdale is the "red character" analysis when he puts his hand on his mind. Surrounded by wonderful prosperity, there is a letter A. (40) The story of "The Scarlet Letter" by Nathaniel Hawthorne. On this line. From scratch to the end, the scarlet letter has a great influence on the development of the plot. The traitor Hester Prynne escaped from her death, but she must wear a red letter.

The interaction ceremony (IR) is a mechanism that converts common feelings into collective foaming and creates respect for the meaning of unity and respect for the symbol of the group, with a common focus change of attention and rhythm. Successful IR creates emotional energy (EE) - high trust, enthusiasm, and initiative; failed IR reduces EE. Individuals are motivated to repeat to avoid high EE interactions and those that reduce EE. IR mechanisms explain differences in personality and behavior in political and social movements. Research applies theory to schools, religion, criminal justice, violence and other disciplines We judged that the essential part of the Durkheim religious theory is the recognition of periodic effervescent elements and rituals. Collective foaming is not a coincidence phenomenon for Durkheim, but its actual situation. He explained this in several paragraphs of "basic form". Aggregated behavior is a particularly powerful stimulant. Once these people gather, they can generate a kind of electricity from their intimate relationship and can raise them quickly to a very high altitude. All expressed emotions resonate without disturbing the openness of the external impression, and each emotion reflects other emotions. Therefore, each time an echo is heard, the first pulse is amplified like an avalanche. Collective foaming and communism: ritual and social process models of Emil Dülkem and Victor Turner The interaction ceremony (IR) is a mechanism that converts common feelings into collective foaming and creates respect for the meaning of unity and respect for the symbol of the group, with a common focus change of attention and rhythm. Successful IR creates emotional energy (EE) - high trust, enthusiasm, and initiative; failed IR reduces EE. Individuals are motivated to repeat to avoid high EE interactions and those that reduce EE. IR mechanisms explain differences in personality and behavior in political and social movements. Research applies theory to schools, religion, criminal justice, violence and other disciplines There is a theory. In 1912, sociologist Emile Dürkem mentioned what he called "collective bubbling". Members of society became moments of the same era under the overwhelming ceremonial compliance catalysis. Durkheim mentions the collective fight of groups of religious fellows who united in religious experience and worship, but the concept has shifted to various environments and is particularly useful for understanding sports fanatics. The same can be said to those who relate us to teams and sports events so that relationships linking us to faith seem to ignore rational interpretation. Discussions by sociologists and philosophers on important works of Durkheim have provided little clarity and accuracy in the discussion of collective foaming and its role in rituals and the creation of new ideals and social creativity. Perhaps this is because sociology almost ignores the symbolic and superhuman anthropological methods of ritual and symbolic phenomena. Ideal appearance is a real part. In practice, however, this is not the maximum clarity that Durkheim can bring to the collective foaming concept of vague definition. 199 Collective foaming and communism: ritual and social process models of Emil Dülkem and Victor Turner

In modern society, we are surrounded by many social phenomena that are identified not by a single human being but by society as a whole. Some of these phenomena caused many dangerous problems threatening society and individuals. People do not understand how these social changes are occurring in our world and how they influence us, but sociologists do. Emile Durchem was one of the important sociologists who introduced the term "amnesia" in 1897. Anomie means that society provides a little moral guidance to individuals. The concept of anomie is a state like the norm of social civil society and guidelines of collapse. Individuals do not have moral guidelines, as society has little effect on individuals' compliance with rules and norms, as abnormalities occur. Individuals are not interested in group society. According to Durkheim, anomalies are caused by rapid division of labor and rapid social change from traditional society to modern society. Anomie brings about alienation among individuals because they feel that their only attachment is the system they do not believe or they do not feel a part of it. It will also cause frustration and lack Durkheim 's concept of anomie refers to a relatively non - permanent condition of a social or social group, but other writers use this condition to point to individual terms. In this psychological application, abnormality means the spirituality of people who do not have standards, continuity, obligation, reject all social bonds. Individuals may feel that community leaders are indifferent to their needs, society is generally unpredictable, lacking in order, and that goals are not being achieved. They feel lacky and believe that employees are not a source of reliable support The theory of abnormality is designed to understand that it is not a problem and society does not provide any moral guidance to individuals. Sociologist Emile Dürkem observed that the period of social destruction brings more anomalies and higher suicide rates and crime rates. Merton believes that abnormalities (normative collapse) and certain types of abnormal behavior are mainly due to the disconnection between social "cultural desire" and socially structured methods to realize these desires I believe there is. In social division of labor, Durkheim explained the loss of norm as a result of unfair labor in society. Broadly speaking, in the era of confusion, as Sociologist Anthony R. Mawson of the UK University of Keele said, more and more people said "to stop accepting the moral justification of society" .

Money is respected, feared, worshiped, and pays the highest respect. "This awe for money is to make sacred achievements themselves and the outcome of Buddy makes sacred his image.Every aspect of the movie is the degree of change due to sacred sacred connections Escape is Even without escaping it can be a powerful and dangerous change. The holy definition is removed from the world of worldly things. Therefore, art is separated from everyday experience and becomes sacred. Emile Durkheim's work mainly understands the concept of divinity and envy. Durkheim (1912) asserts that "sacredness is prominent, the latter should not be touched and punishment can not be touched" (55). Incredibly white, clean, sparse galleries and museums have silence and distance. A group of security personnel that existed so far will monitor people who have sacred objects for a certain period of time. When touched, objects are processed by people designated by reputation, they move with gloved hands. In an incredibly independent state, art enjoys a sacred position Arena, but they are supernatural as they are not born. Instead, they are holy and awkward. Sacred things are always isolated, excellent, strong, and prohibited from normal contact. Embarrassing things are quite the opposite; they are ordinary, quiet and practical everyday life in everyday life. The overwhelming concern of religion is the first of these two things. In the words of Durkheim himself, "Religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices compared to sacred things, that is, divided and forbidden." 7 If you listen to the purpose of these sacred things again Is the answer in the second part of the Durkheim's definition. These practices are "community" and "church" keywords "are moral communities called churches, integrated into everyone who asserts them". There is always a big problem in sacred things. Interests and welfare, groups of people, not just several people but several people

In the world there are many classical sociologists with many different theories and important elements in sociological imagination. James Fulcher and John Scott (No. 21, 2011) explain why sociologists are so important in past and present modern society, and why they are still reasonable. And unless you rely on a theoretical idea, attempting to explain in the real world is impossible to understand the real world. "Karl Marx, Emile Durchem and Max Weber (Three founder's views of the well known" trinity "theory have been explained for hundreds of years. Comparing Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber's ideology are three historical sociologists. Their views have become world famous and have shaped many ways to explain the social structure of many contemporary societies. In this article, we can glimpse the ideal of three sociologists and also clarify possible similarities and differences. Karl Marx's social outlook is based on economics. All other social structures of Marx, such as religion, family values, politics, are rooted in the foundation and the economy. In Marcus' sociological view, religion does not work at all. He is called an atheist. He believes that religion is nothing but a burden to society. "... more content Various views on various religious beliefs on the planet and famous religious studies. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber to work on the paper. Two sociologists and philosophers discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most sociologists of the time write about the role of religion in society, and observations of Karl Marx and Max Weber were particularly relevant to our curriculum. Religion is one of the major social ideologies of influence. Karl Marx and Max Weber are influential sociologists who have paved the way to contemporary sociological thinking schools. Both Karl Marx and Max Weber contribute greatly to the research and foundation of sociology. Without their contribution, sociology will not be noticeable as it is now. Many sociologists are influenced, from the contribution of sociology to how to study and how to apply theory to daily life. Mainly, both theorists discussed the influence of capitalism. Karl Marx and Max Weber are recognized as two of the most prominent theorists in the 19th century. Many people may think that there are many similarities in the theory of these sociologists, but Marx and Weber have been studying similar views, but clearly two very different We have reached the conclusion. In this article, we compare the views of these two influential sociologists and see if they have similarities in understanding about society. I am sufficient to make sure that Marx and Weber are actually different, as is often said, or whether their similarity is sufficient to classify them as equivalent in their important ideas Try to collect evidence.

Population foaming (CE) is a sociological concept introduced by Émile Durkheim. According to Dürkem, communities and societies can sometimes gather, communicate the same idea, and participate in the same action. Such events then cause collective foaming, motivating individuals and helping unify the group. [1] Collective foaming is the basis of Émile Durkheim's religious theory, as he explained in 1912 's Basic Form of Religious Life. Durkheim believes that sacred and sacred universal religious dichotomy comes from the lives of the members of these tribes: most of their lives are spared for trivial things such as hunting and gatherings It is. These tasks are troublesome. Rarely the entire tribe gathers is sacred, and the high energy levels associated with these events are directed to things and sacred people. Therefore, this unit is related to the totem totem which is the symbol of the tribe mentioned by Durchem in the study of the "basic form" of religion in indigenous society. As it provides tribal name, the symbol appears between tribal gatherings. Its appearance in these scenes, the totem represents both the scene and strong emotional feelings, so it is a collective representative of the group. [2] For Durchem, religion is a fundamental social phenomenon. God's faith and practice is a method of social organization. This interpretation is detailed in Chapter 7 of Volume 2 / Elementary Faith Chapter 7 "Origins of these beliefs: the origin of Totem principle or Mana concept". According to Dürkem, "God and society are the same.The clan gods can be clans themselves, but this family is imagined by being transformed into the physical form of plants and animals.Totem" [3] Team members lost their personality and unity with the gods and, according to Durkheim, experienced a sense of losing relationship with the group. [Four] Durkheim, Emil. Basic form of religious life (1912, Joseph Swin's English translation: 1915) Free Press, 1965: International Standard No. 0-02-908010-X, Harper Collins, 1976: ISBN 0-04-200030-0; Karen A new translation of E. Fields, Free Press 1995: ISBN 0-02-907937-3 According to Durchem, a religion was born and legalized through what he called "collective bubbling". Collective foaming means the moment in social life when individual groups of society gather for religious ceremonies. At these moments, the group gathers the same ideas and participates in the same action. And it helps unify the group of people. When individuals are in intimate contact with each other, and when they are assembled this way, some "electricity" is generated and released, leading the participants to a high degree of collective excitement or embarrassment. This non-personal, non-personal power is the central element of religion, leading individuals to a new ideal realm, raising them beyond themselves, and contacting them with abnormal energy Make it feel as if there is something. This is a brief discussion on how ÉmileDurkheim's collective foam structure produces negative and positive results. These examples are allegorical and historical. Emile Durkheim claims that collective foaming is a common emotional state among members of society. Charismatic leadership theory suggests that charismatic leaders "share leaders and strong personal relationships with followers, even though the leaders play a formal organizational role" (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2012 , P. 583). At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", the relationship between Ralph and Jack' s boys are very different because of the emotions they build these relationships.

The cover picture is under the {{:: mainImage.info.license.name || 'unknown'}} license. The cover picture is under the {{:: mainImage.info.license.name || 'unknown'}} license. Credit: (see the original document) W.SF Pickering wrote that "collective effervescence has something similar to rituals." 116 This is absolutely not correct. Indeed, like the Turner community, collective bubbling is a stage or aspect of social existence that can appear in rituals - it is actually a characteristic of many rituals. During the "basic form", Durkheim was fighting social creativity, but like Victor Turner, he was trapped in his paradigm (although Turner fled to a considerable degree). And detailed his thoughts on his social creativity). He saw that the collective foaming that occurred during the ceremony creates a new myth that may be a highly creative and liberal force and become a social myth and moral charter. Collective foaming and communism: ritual and social process models of Emil Dülkem and Victor Turner This is a brief discussion on how ÉmileDurkheim's collective foam structure produces negative and positive results. These examples are allegorical and historical. Emile Durkheim claims that collective foaming is a common emotional state among members of society. Charismatic leadership theory suggests that charismatic leaders "share leaders and strong personal relationships with followers, even though the leaders play a formal organizational role" (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2012 , P. 583). At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", the relationship between Ralph and Jack' s boys are very different because of the emotions they build these relationships.

In today's market there are skilled workers and unskilled workers. As the market moves away from the owner of the business, high-tech workers dominate the market due to the credentials of the past owner. Low skill workers are based on Marx 's worker theory, so they belong to the same category but are equal to serfs and farmers. Marx seems tired of today's market change. Marx believes that in order to accomplish things legally and to ensure compliance with the law, there is still work for immature workers and skilled workers must manage them. Karl Marx introduced materialism to society. Karl Marx helped this theory, formed equality among societies, and sent a better social life. In the era of Karl Marx, he found a big social gap between bourgeoisie and the workers. Bourgeoisie enjoys the results of labor and workers contribute to the labor force. Bourgeoisie introduces the important power of production based on the terms of Marx including capital, land, labor and the social relationship of production refers to division of labor and implicit class relationship. Karl Marx predicted a perfectly equal society. Society believes that ownership of production is equal and that all members of society distribute wealth equally. Bourgeoisie will not make use of the proletariat's interests. This is called Communism. Interestingly, Communism is important to Marx, but he will not contribute to the future of communism as he is not intellectually opposed to providing utopian insight into the future. For Durkheim, the elements necessary for modern society and the difficulties that it creates conflict with Marx in many ways, but in other respects it is very similar. His emphasis on modern society is to control its norms, values ​​and belief systems. After deciding the result of modernization, Durkheim is not as interested in improving modern society as Marcus Comparing Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber's ideology are three historical sociologists. Their views have become world famous and have shaped many ways to explain the social structure of many contemporary societies. In this article, we can glimpse the ideal of three sociologists and also clarify possible similarities and differences. Karl Marx's social outlook is based on economics. All other social structures of Marx, such as religion, family values, politics, are rooted in the foundation and the economy. In Marcus' sociological view, religion does not work at all. He is called an atheist. He believes that religion is nothing but a burden to society. "... more content

Karl Marx and Max Weber were full of the evolution of social and economic thought in the second half of the nineteenth century. These views on the social and social structure of the industry are created through the development of ideals gained from the past revolution that opened the way to the industrial revolution, opened the path to progressive commercial development, and expanded the class It was. The gap between them. From the perspective of bourgeoisie, the development of capitalist society is a very favorable goal. This article pertains to Max Weber, but it is important to compare sociologists to each other based on their concepts and ideas. An author discussed the Karl Marx in the lecture. The theory of Marx and Weber is not much different. Marx also thinks that the class refers to the economy, but it is so in another sense. Marx believes that the class is related to production means, but Weber associates the class with the aforementioned factors, fame, wealth, and most importantly power. Both of them agree that the higher the skill, the better the salary will rise. However, Weber believes that the difference in wages of people is indicative of the material state of the person, so there are different kinds of social behavior. Furthermore, unlike Weber, Marx thinks that division of class is an important cause of social conflict in social conflict. Comparing Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber's ideology are three historical sociologists. Their views have become world famous and have shaped many ways to explain the social structure of many contemporary societies. In this article, we can glimpse the ideal of three sociologists and also clarify possible similarities and differences. Karl Marx's social outlook is based on economics. All other social structures of Marx, such as religion, family values, politics, are rooted in the foundation and the economy. In Marcus' sociological view, religion does not work at all. He is called an atheist. He believes that religion is nothing but a burden to society. "... more content Max Weber, Karl Marx, Emil Durchem In general, religion is one of the social-oriented theories and has some influence on the social stability of society. This is because religion is the driving force of social supervision and unstable dynamics of change. Max Weber, Karl Marx and Emile Durchem were still very influential people in the 19th century.

Population foaming (CE) is a sociological concept introduced by Émile Durkheim. According to Dürkem, communities and societies can sometimes gather, communicate the same idea, and participate in the same action. Such events then cause collective foaming, motivating individuals and helping unify the group. [1] Collective foaming is the basis of Émile Durkheim's religious theory, as he explained in 1912 's Basic Form of Religious Life. Durkheim believes that sacred and sacred universal religious dichotomy comes from the lives of the members of these tribes: most of their lives are spared for trivial things such as hunting and gatherings It is. These tasks are troublesome. Rarely the entire tribe gathers is sacred, and the high energy levels associated with these events are directed to things and sacred people. Therefore, this unit is related to the totem totem which is the symbol of the tribe mentioned by Durchem in the study of the "basic form" of religion in indigenous society. As it provides tribal name, the symbol appears between tribal gatherings. Its appearance in these scenes, the totem represents both the scene and strong emotional feelings, so it is a collective representative of the group. [2] For Durchem, religion is a fundamental social phenomenon. God's faith and practice is a method of social organization. This interpretation is detailed in Chapter 7 of Volume 2 / Elementary Faith Chapter 7 "Origins of these beliefs: the origin of Totem principle or Mana concept". According to Dürkem, "God and society are the same.The clan gods can be clans themselves, but this family is imagined by being transformed into the physical form of plants and animals.Totem" [3] Team members lost their personality and unity with the gods and, according to Durkheim, experienced a sense of losing relationship with the group. [Four] Durkheim, Emil. Basic form of religious life (1912, Joseph Swin's English translation: 1915) Free Press, 1965: International Standard No. 0-02-908010-X, Harper Collins, 1976: ISBN 0-04-200030-0; Karen A new translation of E. Fields, Free Press 1995: ISBN 0-02-907937-3 According to Durchem, a religion was born and legalized through what he called "collective bubbling". Collective foaming means the moment in social life when individual groups of society gather for religious ceremonies. At these moments, the group gathers the same ideas and participates in the same action. And it helps unify the group of people. When individuals are in intimate contact with each other, and when they are assembled this way, some "electricity" is generated and released, leading the participants to a high degree of collective excitement or embarrassment. This non-personal, non-personal power is the central element of religion, leading individuals to a new ideal realm, raising them beyond themselves, and contacting them with abnormal energy Make it feel as if there is something. This is a brief discussion on how ÉmileDurkheim's collective foam structure produces negative and positive results. These examples are allegorical and historical. Emile Durkheim claims that collective foaming is a common emotional state among members of society. Charismatic leadership theory suggests that charismatic leaders "share leaders and strong personal relationships with followers, even though the leaders play a formal organizational role" (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2012 , P. 583). At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", the relationship between Ralph and Jack' s boys are very different because of the emotions they build these relationships.

In this article, I will explain whether an individual is a social product or a social product is an individual product. I generally believe that society is a human product in the answer to this question. I introduce early people, hunters, and collectors as an initial society, but lack the critical nature of society. Then I will continue to support my theory by analyzing the beginning of the known society about 3, 500 years ago. Individuals and society can not be separated Individuals are born in society, ideologies and lifestyles are formed in society and enjoy their rights in society. Individuals and society depend on each other for their existence. Society consists of individuals who decide to build mutually friendly relationships through common interests. "The word socialization comes from the word société in French, in other words it comes from the Latin societas, which means" companions, comrades, business partners, etc. " Basically, this term means that people in a group share some common concerns and benefits, common goals, common identities, and common cultures. By sharing common culture, belief system, religion, art, architecture, history, and cultural background, people and culture, or nation will be born. This, in turn, helps individuals gain access to his social, religious, cultural and national identity. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shailesh_Trivedi2/publication/323239845_International_Conference_On_Role_of_Arts_Culture_Humanities_Religion_Education_Ethics_Philosophy_Spirituality_and_Science_for_Holistic_Societal_Development/links/5a87f22ca6fdcc6b1a3b5f07/International-Conference-On-Role-of-Arts-Culture-Humanities-Religion-Education-Ethics-Philosophy-Spirituality-and- Science, society, development.pdf for the whole Personal careers are often associated with individual identities in society. People with different faiths and beliefs gather at a common platform, share knowledge and apply it to the living area, so a personal society with a different cultural / ethnic background diversifies and enriches the community of people It helps to do. Please advance. Because American creation is a typical example of such a society "land of opportunity" people from all over the world come here to find their "pie" What is the relationship between individuals and society? Functionalists believe that individuals are formed by society through the influence of institutions such as families, schools and workplaces. Early sociologists such as Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and even Karl Marx, who were not functionalists, regarded society as being outside the individual. For Durchem, society is a reality, it is the individual's original origin and importance. Durkheim's keen discussion on collective consciousness shows social interactions and relationships, and how society ultimately influences personal attitudes, thoughts and emotions. He uses his "collective expression" theory to explain the concepts of religion, suicide, and social solidarity.

Results This section describes employee responses when customers send to third-party employees. The dialogue for accurately recording the contents is not recorded, but the main part of the conversation will be explained. In Mexican fast food restaurant Chipotle, the customer approached the first stop where he ordered burrito. The first employee asked, "What can I start with?", The customer replied, "Andrew gets a chicken burrito." The employee then continues to heat the tortilla and ask the customer what kind of rice and beans he wants. Social Deviation Social deviation is a term that refers to the behavior and quality of others who evaluate and evaluate people in society. What is the deviation accurately? This article focuses on social bias rather than physiological deviations from expectation. In general, behaviors that do not conform to social norms are deviations, and such actions are contrary to important social norms, so many people are refused. Society ... social deviation Social deviations are derived from a negative aggressive attitude toward parents by their parents. This pressure, coupled with obedience of the society itself, has biased specific members of society to so-called sociologists' abnormal groups. These anomalous groups such as punk, hippie, or other radical organization often fight society who think they do not think it worth noting, therefore they ignore them. But Emile Durkheim pointed out that bias is important to the structure When discussing bias, abnormal over integration is often overlooked or misunderstood. The deviation itself violates socially desirable behavior that is created and enforced by influential (powerful) people and applied to specific individuals or groups in certain circumstances such as Val Morrison on May 5 It refers to hypothetical behavior. As defined in the district. Therefore, in an acceptable range of behavior under normal circumstances, overintegration is a bias based on acceptance and compliance. Here, the actions, characteristics, ideas of players and coaches include extreme consistency to perform 'supernormal'. It may act and endanger yourself and other people (p.154, social sports)

The social network theory dates back to the 1950s, Barnes (1954) was called the word creation. Social network theory is a study of how people, group social structures, or organizations influence beliefs and behaviors (Dunn, 1983). The theory sees relationships in terms of nodes and relationships. A node can be defined as a single participant in a network and a connection is a relationship between participants. (Dunn, 1983). These nodes and connections are usually displayed in a chart showing the connection between them. Social network theory: Studies of transformation, religious division, secularization use social network theory to understand the influence of community and network on religious life of individuals, groups and society. In his classic suicide study, Emile Durchem used religion as an indicator of social integration (Durkheim 1897). Other studies show that religion is actively building a social network (Bainbridge 2006). Socio-economic composition, scale: This measure usually evaluates the composition of religious organizations in the form of income or education, based on the social class of religious groups. Since this metric is designed to understand group level attributes, it is in a congregation level dataset or dataset and asks individuals to estimate specific things about their congregation. The social network theory dates back to the 1950s, Barnes (1954) was called the word creation. Social network theory is a study of how people, group social structures, or organizations influence beliefs and behaviors (Dunn, 1983). The theory sees relationships in terms of nodes and relationships. A node can be defined as a single participant in a network and a connection is a relationship between participants. (Dan, 1983) Research on social networks is called social network analysis or social network theory. Surveys indicate that social networks work at different levels from home to the country and play an important role in determining the solution of the problem, the method of functioning, and the degree of achievement of individual goals. Social network theory argues that personal characteristics and features that are often considered important are in fact less important than personal relationships and relationships with other participants in the network I will. Critics believe that this view weakens the individual's power and identity. Despite these criticisms, sociologists still influence individuals, so they are studying social networks. Social networking is considered a basic tool that individuals use to connect with society.

We are doing our lives everyday and doing what we have done so far. In a sense, this is just a tradition. Our political views, language, customs can link to the culture we already know. Individualism comes from our culture and is very important to how we interact with other cultures in the world. It is safe to say that families tradition and cultural heritage play a very important role in our life. They can define who we are and in some cases can obviously hinder us from personalizing ourselves. Increases in values ​​such as individualism and equality have an impact on the patterns of modern family members. Traditional families and modern families have similarities in terms of constitutional concepts and the environment of love and care but there are some differences in the role of family size and gender. Traditional families and modern families have similarities to the concept of the Constitution. Like traditional families, modern families are still an integral part of Western society. In other words, both are 'unit structure' or 'basic life' of social composition. What is the relationship between individuals and society? Functionalists believe that individuals are formed by society through the influence of institutions such as families, schools and workplaces. Early sociologists such as Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and even Karl Marx, who were not functionalists, regarded society as being outside the individual. For Durchem, society is a reality, it is the individual's original origin and importance. Durkheim's keen discussion on collective consciousness shows social interactions and relationships, and how society ultimately influences personal attitudes, thoughts and emotions. He uses his "collective expression" theory to explain the concepts of religion, suicide, and social solidarity. The influence of society on the death of Arthur Miller's salesman The death of a salesman by Arthur Miller is investigating the influence of the outside world on individuals. These influences include beliefs that believe that society as a whole, a family as a social unit, and an individual should support it. In order to understand the struggle he is working with Willy Loman, he must first understand his society. Willie, a spiritually unstable salesman of Arthur Miller, who had played the role of a salesman, relied on mirror tools in a changing American society drama. Several critics have argued that Miller uses dramas to express misfortune in changing society. Miller is not clear in his social criticism, but the death of a salesman has made many unconscious attacks against his view of social decline.

Deviations are defined as acts or behaviors that violate social norms. In other words, the concept of deviation depends on social observation and recognition. "By its nature, constructivism that defines and interprets behavior and appearance is always" social ". (Henry, 2009, p. 6). According to cultural and social factors, human situation perception may be perfect. The way to talk, walk, dress and hug is because you are seeing other people. What is illegal entry? Deviations represent actions or actions that violate social and social norms. There are two types of departure. A positive bias means that someone is beyond social norms. Just like the direct "A" students of high school and high school, when others do extra things they do not look nice and I hate others. Negative bias is more recognized in both. When someone meets social norms. For example, students who do not work by skipping the course. What is the deviation accurately? What is the relationship between deviation and crime? According to sociologist William Graham Sumner, deviation is an infringement of an established context, cultural or social norm, whether it is folk customs, customs or civilization (1906). It can be as little as a public nose, or as important as a murder. The term "deviant" has a negative meaning in daily terms, but sociologists recognize that bias is not necessarily bad (Schoepflin 2011). In fact, in terms of structural functionalism, one positive contribution of deviation is that it promotes social change. For example, during the American Civil Rights Movement, Rosa Parks refused to move to the "black zone" of the bus in violation of social norms, 9th Xiao Xin broke the habit of isolation and entered the Arkansas public school. Social Deviation Social deviation is a term that refers to the behavior and quality of others who evaluate and evaluate people in society. What is the deviation accurately? This article focuses on social bias rather than physiological deviations from expectation. In general, behaviors that do not conform to social norms are deviations, and such actions are contrary to important social norms, so many people are refused. Society ... social deviation Social deviations are derived from a negative aggressive attitude toward parents by their parents. This pressure, coupled with obedience of the society itself, has biased specific members of society to so-called sociologists' abnormal groups. These unusual groups such as punk, hippie, or other radical organization often fight society who think they do not think that they are noteworthy, so they are ignoring them. But Emile Durkheim pointed out that bias is important to the structure

Marxism thinks that the present society is a byproduct of the history of all class conflicts. From the complex classification of feudal lords, clergy, merchants, craftsmen and slaves, it has been reduced to two conflicting groups, bourgeoisie or oppressor, proletariat or suppressed. Bourgeoisie can not continue to exist without changing its production method. This includes expanding the market, "creating the world with its own image" and establishing connections around the world to make society dependent on bourgeoisie. Marxism analyzes the main dynamics behind the development of human society from the early tribal society to the present age. The way Marxism pursues this winding path is called historical materialism. With this scientific approach, a series of irrelevant and unexpected events can be understood, not history, but as part of a clear understanding and interrelationship process. This is a series of actions and responses including political, economic and social development as a whole. It is a matter of historical materialism to clarify the complex dialectical relation of all these phenomena. Functionalism and Marxism can be traced back to the theory adopted by sociologists in the 19th century. Marxism came from German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883), and functionalism originally came from Auguste Com (1798-1857). It was then further developed by Emile Durkheim (1858-1917). Functionalism theory depicts society as a structured system that forms a whole by a series of interconnected parts (or units). These units are systems in society such as family, religion, education. These institutions are essential for maintaining harmonious and orderly management of society. Early functionalists such as Durkheim often used analogies between society and human-like organisms. Society also works because the body works reliably with all organs. Functionalists are proposing a consensus theory that social values ​​are learned through people and institutions with different social values. Essay.com/ In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism. In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and explain the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism. Marxism has developed into another sect and ideology. While sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxist concepts, while at the same time no longer stressing or refusing other aspects of Marxism, different schools place more emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism . Several variants of Marxism mainly concentrate on one aspect of Marxism as a decisive force in social development - production aspects, classes, power relations or ownership - other aspects of the argument are less important , Or the current study irrelevant Critical Similar despite the similar assumptions, different Marxist schools may reach conflicting conclusions. For example, different Marxian economists will explain the contradictions of the economic crisis and the different predictions about the outcome of these crises. In addition, various variants of Marxism use Marxist analysis to study various aspects of society (eg popular culture, economic crisis, or feminism).

The whole structure uses partial global calculations and the whole fuzzy concept is presented accurately as the structure of atomic Boolean lattice. Since each element of our experience can be viewed as its intended use, the overall prototype structure so defined has category status. This will be explained using examples from different ontological domains. Hypothesis of structure, that is, error-prone function is reflected in inappropriateness in grasping the fact of quantum logic. "Another way to paralyze critical thinking is to compromise the structural diagrams of all forms of the world.The facts lose certain properties and they are only a part of the structured whole.All of these From the fact that we are not very concerned with what we heard, we can not be excited, emotional or critical judgment: under the name of "freedom", life loses all its structure; It consists of small pieces separated from each other. Lack of holistic meaning He is confused and frightened and continues to gaze at his useless little things. - ErichFlåm It can be an abstract, narrative or structured type. The narrative summary is a summary of the entire work and gives the reader the opportunity to know if he is interested in reading the whole article. If you need to provide a list of information or questions, a structured summary is used for scientific research. This will be explained later in the main text. By using subtitles, you can make your readers understand what their job structure is like; the first task in writing case studies is to choose the best case study topic. Usually, students can choose their own theme. This is a way to encourage teachers to express their inadequacies about subjects and curriculum as a whole. If you can not produce the idea of ​​the correct case study, please benefit from the list of our classic topics. Structural functions The structural functional paradigm uses macros (focusing on shaping the structure of the whole society) mainly to see the society as a complex system that partly promotes unity and stability, August Comte, Emile Durkheim And Talcott-Parsons. People believe that humans can prosper under these conditions. Focus is a society as the subject of social prosperity, making unity, cohesion, stability, and order the basic need for social being. Chaos, instability, alienation are considered not to be welcomed, impairing the functions of society

The role of religion in society The role of religion in society is definitely a dynamic role. The relationship between religion and society is constantly changing. Religion affects various societies in various ways in various ways and brings about a change in social form based on the change of religion. Religion can be a driving force of society, but it is rather reactive rather than a radical one. Functionalist functionalist thinks that religion maintains social solidarity, emphasizes consensus among social population, and it helps to maintain social well-being. Religious sociology includes practice, historical background, development, universal theme, and role of religion in society. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of religion throughout all societies and recorded history. The difference between religious sociology and religious philosophy is that sociologists are not starting to evaluate the validity of religious truths, but rather Peter L. Berger states "methodology atheism". Formal discipline of contemporary sociology began with a religious analysis of the 1897 study on the Durkem's suicide rate between the papacy and the Protestant. Modern discussions tend to focus on topics such as secularization, civil religion, intersection of religion and economy, and the role of religion in the context of globalization and multiculturalism. Secularization is a historical process in which religion loses its social and cultural significance. For secularization, the role of religion in modern society is limited. In a secularized society, faith lacks cultural authority and religious organizations have little social power. Secularization has many levels of meaning both theoretically and historically. Social theorists such as Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, etc. speculate that the modernization of society includes a decline in the level of religious beliefs. Research on this process is aimed at determining the way and extent to which religious beliefs, practices, and institutions lose social significance. The secularization of modern civilization is due to the inability to adapt to the wide range of ethical and spiritual needs of mankind, and the rapid development of the physical science. The United States needs a major national debate about the real role of religion in a free and pluralistic society. For decades the former famous religious position in society has been eroded. The religious leaders who are to be at the forefront of the moral and spiritual Renaissance are strangely cowardly. Americans who believe in religious beliefs should not be convinced that religion must remain unrestricted in all issues related to public interest. Freedom of religion prescribed in the Constitution does not mean that the Constitution prohibits religion from entering public places.

There are many explanations about the characteristics of punishment. For Emile Dürkem, punishment is mainly an expression of social solidarity, not criminal countermeasures. Here, since perpetrators are attacking the social moral order through crime, they must be punished to show that this moral order is still "effective". Durkheim's theory asserts that punishment must be made visible to everyone. It therefore represents the anger of challenging the collective values ​​of all members of society. Punishment such as revenge, deterrence, or recovery. For example, some societies may punish animals that have never made a mistake or punish inanimate objects. Durkheim also explored how social rituals work to maintain social ideals. According to Dürkem, the great ideal of civilization was born in the era of cultural innovation and crisis selection, human interaction reached intense driving force at that time, and created a new idea. However, society can not maintain this strength, but it returns to normal level. Does society have the right to punish? Is it morally reasonable to impose penalties? These complicated problems will be dealt with in the rationale of rationale, rationale and nature of punishment below. As laws and regulations as well as rules concerning punishment such as the number of penalties that can be imposed and types of actions are of course included in laws and regulations, in that sense the law defends punishment. However, although the law can prescribe punishment, the moral grounds and the legal grounds of punishment are separate issues, as the moral reason for penalties in society must still be established. The reasons for punishment seem to come from a moral and legal point of view. Discussion on retaliation points out that criminals should be punished for their misconduct. Utilitarian reasons for punishment is that law offenders should be punished for the benefit of society. If you look closely at the discussions of both sides, there are loopholes that can not be ignored. The retaliatory debate seems to be punished for revenge, so long as social utility is maximized, Utilitarians do not seem to care about who they punish. Both arguments have promises, but what options are there to maintain social order? You must try to understand the intent of punishment and the impact on criminals and society. Regardless of Utilitarian or punitive, the reasons for penalties help to evaluate the effectiveness of the punishment itself and whether it is the sole purpose.

A sense of alienation in contemporary society Compare and contrast the dance of Mike · Newell with the stranger and shallow tomb of Danny · Boyle. The reason I chose because the two movies had different characteristics in the alienation framework. Both emphasize alienation, isolation, and persistence of contemporary alienation, but Newell is discussing alienation in terms of class and gender difference; Boyle makes a sense of alienation in the workplace as alienation and labor I regard it. A typical confused thought about fashion exclusion in some aspects at the moment is Eric and Mary of "Single: alienation in modern society" first published in 1962, which was reprinted eight times in 1962 It is a book by Josephson. . For Joseph, Alienation represents a myriad of lives in our quiet despair period, as well as a list of alienated people, including women, immigrants, sexual alterators, drug addicts, young people and artists. However, the editors understand the sense of alienation as a state of mind. "Is a psychosocial barrier such as loss of domain, anxiety, abnormality, despair, collapse, unfounded, apathy, social collapse, loneliness, nuclear power and so on. , Helpless, meaningless, isolated, pessimistic, lost faith and values In 1951 American sociologists C. Wright Mills and White Collar conducted a major study on alienation in modern society and explained how modern consumer capitalism formed society. Personality Melvin Seeman was part of the surge in alienation studies in the mid-20th century when he published his paper "On the meaning of alienation" in 1959 (Senekal, 2010b: 7-8). Seeman uses the insights of Marx, Emile Durkheim, etc. and builds five prominent features that are often regarded as models to identify alienation. Powerless, meaningless, routine behavior, isolation, and self-distance Seeman later added the sixth element (cultural barrier), but this element became less noticeable in later work discussions.

Many historical courses offered to students through their educational career provide a positive or negative explanation as well as historical events. Therefore, the information taught in these courses supports analysis of incidental events. In "portrait of America", the covered material is given a positive rotation. The author chooses to ignore the negative interpretation, but the fact they contain helps to personalize the parties involved in each topic. This approach can provide students with ideas that are not common in other historical references. Writer David Robson recently discussed active linguistic editing projects with BBC's article led by Dr. Tim Lomas, instructor at the University of East London, and author of Positive Psychology, which identifies and collects specific emotional expressions. Global vocabulary There is no experience comparable to English. The BBC article points to a study by Professor Lisa Feldman Barrett of North Eastern University. This shows that our ability to support the work of Lomas and identify and classify emotions brings extensive benefits. Interestingly, she discovered that this ability can determine the ability to cope with our life. For example, if you can distinguish between sorrow and anxiety, you can better determine what you need now, such as whether you are chatting with a friend or relaxing an interesting comedy. Here is a brief discussion of how the collective foam structure of Emile Durkheim produces negative and positive results. These examples are allegorical and historical. Emile Dürkem claims that collective foaming is a common emotional state among members of society. The charismatic leadership theory suggests that charismatic leaders "share a strong personal relationship with followers, even though the leadership has a formal organizational role" (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2012, p. 583). At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", the connection between Ralph and the boys on Jack' s islands varies greatly due to the emotions they build these connections. Unity can be understood as the degree of relevance between people's common interests and goals, mutual knowledge, group identity and attribution, mutual understanding and trust. Cohesion is in a positive relationship with the amount, type and / or strength of common interests and interactions and provides the basis for solidarity, mobilization and joint action. On the contrary, distrust, lack of mutual understanding, and mutual ignorance can be easily misused by people trying to confront and divide and confront the cohesion. It is important to understand what partitions exist within specific communities and between communities. Preventing terrorism and fighting against violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism: community security methods

Marxism thinks that the present society is a byproduct of the history of all class conflicts. From the complex classification of feudal lords, clergy, merchants, craftsmen and slaves, it has been reduced to two conflicting groups, bourgeoisie or oppressor, proletariat or suppressed. Bourgeoisie can not continue to exist without changing its production method. This includes expanding the market, "creating the world with its own image" and establishing connections around the world to make society dependent on bourgeoisie. Marxism analyzes the main dynamics behind the development of human society from the early tribal society to the present age. The way Marxism pursues this winding path is called historical materialism. With this scientific approach, a series of irrelevant and unexpected events can be understood, not history, but as part of a clear understanding and interrelationship process. This is a series of actions and responses including political, economic and social development as a whole. It is a matter of historical materialism to clarify the complex dialectical relation of all these phenomena. Functionalism and Marxism can be traced back to the theory adopted by sociologists in the 19th century. Marxism came from German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883), and functionalism originally came from Auguste Com (1798-1857). It was then further developed by Emile Durkheim (1858-1917). Functionalism theory depicts society as a structured system that forms a whole by a series of interconnected parts (or units). These units are systems in society such as family, religion, education. These institutions are essential for maintaining harmonious and orderly management of society. Early functionalists such as Durkheim often used analogies between society and human-like organisms. Society also works because the body works reliably with all organs. Functionalists are proposing a consensus theory that social values ​​are learned through people and institutions with different social values. Essay.com/ In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism. In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and explain the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism. Marxism has developed into another sect and ideology. While sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxist concepts, while at the same time no longer stressing or refusing other aspects of Marxism, different schools place more emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism . Several variants of Marxism mainly concentrate on one aspect of Marxism as a decisive force in social development - production aspects, classes, power relations or ownership - other aspects of the argument are less important , Or the current study irrelevant Critical Similar despite the similar assumptions, different Marxist schools may reach conflicting conclusions. For example, different Marxian economists will explain the contradictions of the economic crisis and the different predictions about the outcome of these crises. In addition, various variants of Marxism use Marxist analysis to study various aspects of society (eg popular culture, economic crisis, or feminism).

The value of using goods and services according to the financial role of Marx is created by all society, capitalist, non-capitalist. The value of these applications is not particularly measurable in a numerical sense; it is the level of community demand, or the social needs of specific goods and services. Uniqueness of capitalistic production is the exchange value of goods and services. Exchange value is the value of goods or services compared to other goods or services. Understanding the value in use and exchange value defines two major economies - a self-sufficiency economy and a surplus production economy. Karl Marx (1818-1883) is a German philosopher who believes that the material product is the root of the social world. Marx believes that social life is fundamentally a confrontation of food, land, money and other important products. Marx believes that the ideal government will be a communist country with equal resources. Emile Durkheim (1858 - 1917) is a French sociologist who helps build sociology by proveing ​​that society must conduct research in its own way - to understand individual psychology It is not enough. Durkheim considers society to be a combination of common values, and as society becomes larger and more complicated, these values ​​change with the passage of time. In 1875, Karl Marx wrote: "According to his ability, everyone is according to their needs." (Criticism of the Gotha program) Emotions are faster than Marx, usually associated with principles of communism It is. However, in order to reflect the emotions behind Marx 's discourse, society does not need to be organized according to the principles of communism. Because not everyone is doing the same economic contribution, our society mainly taxes people based on income - based on the ability to pay. Most of these taxes are used to pay the benefits of infrastructure and services for all members of society, many of which are unevenly distributed among people with unequal needs. Marx believes that the phenomenon of commodity fetishism plays an important role in the erroneous consciousness of workers. He uses this phrase - product fetishism - to refer to how capitalism creates relationships between people (workers and owners) as things (money and products) in relation. According to Marx, this obscures the fact that the production relationship within capitalism is actually a relationship between people, and therefore they are subject to fluctuations. Italian scholars, writers and activists Antonio Gramsci further explained the ideological elements of misconsciousness based on Marxian theory. Gramsci believes that the process of cultural hegemony led by people with economic, social and cultural power in society has created the idea of ​​"common sense" that justifies the present situation.

In prostitution sociology as a form of deviation, the term escape means all violations of social rules, regardless of their seriousness (Sociology Essentials 136). Deviation is a personal or organizational behavior that violates social norms and often involves a negative reaction from others. According to sociologist S. Becker, he said actions themselves are not deviations of behavior, but depends on how society reacts to behavior. Specific existence status marked as abnormal in the United States Social Deviation Social deviation is a term that refers to the behavior and quality of others who evaluate and evaluate people in society. What is the deviation accurately? This article focuses on social bias rather than physiological deviations from expectation. In general, behaviors that do not conform to social norms are deviations, and such actions are contrary to important social norms, so many people are refused. Society ... social deviation Social deviations are derived from a negative aggressive attitude toward parents by their parents. This pressure, coupled with obedience of the society itself, has biased specific members of society to so-called sociologists' abnormal groups. These unusual groups such as punk, hippie, or other radical organization often fight society who think they do not think that they are noteworthy, so they are ignoring them. But Emile Durkheim pointed out that bias is important to the structure In prostitution sociology as a form of deviation, the term escape means all violations of social rules, regardless of their seriousness (Sociology Essentials 136). Deviation is a personal or organizational behavior that violates social norms and often involves a negative reaction from others. According to sociologist S. Becker, he said actions themselves are not deviations of behavior, but depends on how society reacts to behavior. - Despite the origin of the term, deviation means, generally speaking, "deformer" is less capable, less socially responsible, less regulated and useful for society than lucky and upright It is about people. There are few ordinary people. (Social deviation of Australia, page 4). Alcohol is the leading cause of criminal convictions and imprisonment in indigenous drinking cases.

Introduction Carl Marx and Emile Durkheim are co-founder of the field of sociology. Each will develop academic disciplines in their respective fields and contribute to the achievement of social science curriculum. Durkheim is a person who produces social facts and sociological theories and has produced functionalism, division of labor, education and social solidarity, methodology, positivism and sociology, primitive classification, religion and suicide. Durkhiem believes that social facts should be seen as the same things and events as the natural world. School violence can occur in all academic disciplines. This term includes verbal or physical quarrels and there is a possibility of murder. In the case of school violence in the early 20th century from 1990 to the present, there is a record showing that school violence has increased. Results vary from school violence incidents, there is no clear reason. Some communities unite and unite in the suffering of school violence, but other communities feel anger and frustration Most learners have a clear understanding of the form of school violence that is widespread at school. The explanation of violence at their school is consistent with the explanation about violence at the school of Crawage (2005). In other words, school violence can be physical or emotional. According to the survey, the most common form of bullying is bullying, most school learners are confirming this. According to the survey, older boys are perpetrators of this type of school violence. The above results are consistent with the literature (Prinsloo, 2008; Smit, 2007) Violence at school is one of the most visible forms of violence against children. Violence at school takes a variety of forms from physical violence to psychological violence. It is usually expressed through bullying, intimidation, repression. Violence in schools causes anxiety and fear that infringes on the right to learn in a safe and dangerous environment, impairing the general atmosphere of the school. Schools can not fulfill the role of learning and socialization if the children are not in an environment free of violence.

Marxism. As he is responsible for the totalitarian disaster, the arrogance and contempt of Eastern Marx is no longer mentioned. In the West, he is still controversial, but in most cases his views are no longer linked to all the points they have confirmed. Several people have read Marx in particular for "ancient". Due to fear of communism, he is considered to be so. Other people, I read him for political reasons. As Markus himself said, he read Marx so that Marxism can adequately prove that he can represent an appropriate way to deal with some of today 's "social superstructure". Karl Marx and Marxist Karl Marx led the modern communism and socialism in the work of the late nineteenth century. In cooperation with his friend Heinrich Engels, he produced the "Communist declaration" written in 1848. The political and socio-economic structure of many failing countries is based on Marx's theory such as the Soviet Union and East Germany. Many people think that Marxism does not apply to today's society As Karl Marx suggested, his idea is not history. Aspect Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist, stating that everything is functioning in society, his biggest concern is to discover this function. Conflict theorist Karl Marx, on the other hand, emphasized that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict leading to social change. Karl Marx (1818-1883) - Founder of Marxism, a German philosopher. Karl Marx wrote Das Capital and the Communist Party Declaration. Marx believes that capitalism is inherently unfair and fraudulent. Marx believes that the Communist revolution will have historical inevitability in the industrial society. Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902) - a priest in India. Vivekananda traveled the United States and talked about the ideal of religious tolerance in the 1893 World Religious Parliament. He taught a spiritual path combining oriental mysticism and Western vitality, which is an important figure of the Indian Renaissance. Karl Marx's idea is called Marxism. Marxism has influenced the development of social thought Many scholars believe Marx is a great economist and founder of economic history and sociology. Marxism stands for social hives and hazards. People who follow these ideas are called Marxists (World Book 238). Karl Marx influenced the society in which he lives, religion, and many countries and the world. He introduced the concept of communism and capitalism. He facilitated middle-class workers, and he founded many organizations. He changed people's perceptions of the government and changed perception of the people world. Marx is not a bad guy seeking world governance but a good man trying to make the world a better place.

The American social system treats individuals fairly. Because people pose a threat to themselves, pose a threat to others, and large confusion occurs without a judicial system. When Walter came between reality and fantasy, the delusions were the theme of James Tiber's "Secret Life of Walter Mitti" in the early 20th century. Twenty five years later, Ray Bradbury showed Albert Block's view on schizophrenia as a "murderer" in the story. However, in the late 20th century, the smartest cure was between Dr. Mark Powell and Gene Brewer's K-Pax probe. What is the relationship between individuals and society? Functionalists believe that individuals are formed by society through the influence of institutions such as families, schools and workplaces. Early sociologists such as Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and even Karl Marx, who were not functionalists, regarded society as being outside the individual. For Durchem, society is a reality, it is the individual's original origin and importance. Durkheim's keen discussion on collective consciousness shows social interactions and relationships, and how society ultimately influences personal attitudes, thoughts and emotions. He uses his "collective expression" theory to explain the concepts of religion, suicide, and social solidarity. How can individuals help build a society? For cross actors, it is through people's interactions that we can form a society. The main supporter of this approach is Max Weber (social behavior theorist) who says that society is based on personal interpretation. A structuralist (or functionalist) tends to examine the relationship between self (individual) and society from the viewpoint of the impact of society on individuals. Interactors, on the other hand, tend to emphasize people who work "outside" from self (individuals) and create society. Individuals are products of society, but society is also a product of individuals. In any relationship, individuals and society interact with each other. In Nathaniel Hawthorne's "red letter", even though society did not define these values ​​and morals, Hester became a person through active guidance of his values ​​and morals. - Our world is a world full of violence, and even the most common people will find faced with fears that do not appear in words with little or no intention. In Flannery O'Connor's "good guys are hard to find", the character finds himself because of a memory mistake and a few armed orders due to some wrong turns.

Individuals and social medicine Since 1715, medicine has made great progress in society. Without medical advances, we have no way of living today. Various countries and individuals in these countries contribute to this process. Medical science has greatly expanded human lives. Our position today is that many great people contributed to us and made medical progress in our history. Testing and theory of these people are major factors. What is the relationship between individuals and society? Functionalists believe that individuals are formed by society through the influence of institutions such as families, schools and workplaces. Early sociologists such as Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and even Karl Marx, who were not functionalists, regarded society as being outside the individual. For Durchem, society is a reality, it is the individual's original origin and importance. Durkheim's keen discussion on collective consciousness shows social interactions and relationships, and how society ultimately influences personal attitudes, thoughts and emotions. He uses his "collective expression" theory to explain the concepts of religion, suicide, and social solidarity. How can individuals help to build society For cross actors, it is through people's interaction that society can be formed. The main supporter of this approach is Max Weber (social behavior theorist) who says that society is based on personal interpretation. A structuralist (or functionalist) tends to examine the relationship between self (individual) and society from the viewpoint of the impact of society on individuals. Interactors, on the other hand, tend to emphasize people who work "outside" from self (individuals) and create society. Individuals are products of society, but society is also a product of individuals. In any relationship, individuals and society interact with each other. In Nathaniel Hawthorne's "red letter", even though society did not define these values ​​and morals, Hester became a person through active guidance of his values ​​and morals. - Our world is a world full of violence, and even the most common people will find faced with fears that do not appear in words with little or no intention. In Flannery O'Connor's "good guys are hard to find", the character finds himself because of a memory mistake and a few armed orders due to some wrong turns.

In society, individuals observe different situations according to their opinions. For example, the color of the walls of the room depends on the color judged. I think that room is aquamarine, room is turquoise, room is blue. Everyone has their own way of thinking. Some philosophers believe that human beings were born with the ability to think rationally. Rational thinking is unique to humans. The view of the functionalist was first promoted by the earliest sociologists such as Auguste Comte (a person who created the term "sociology"), Herbert Spencer, Emir Durkheim, Max Weber. What is particularly relevant here is the organic analogy of Comte (1851), each part consists of many parts, all of which function for the survival of the whole entity. Spencer (1860) also used "public analogy" with many system requirements and a public society like living things; if these needs are not met, the system (organism or society) It may be dismantled. Next, we look for something necessary for survival from social system. Spencer called this process a necessary functionalism (Turner 2003) Development theory is to try to understand society and improve social life. The classical theorists, Auguste Conte, Herbert Spencer, Emile Durchem, Carl Marx, Max Weber are trying to explain the fundamental change that has occurred in modern times and create a society. An idea to improve society. <ref> {{Quote Web | Last = Essay | First = UK | URL = https://www.ukessays.com/essays/sociology/the-development-of-sociology-as-a-discipline-sociology-essay. Php? Sociological development as title = field Publisher = UKEssays.com | Date = November 2013 | accessdate = October 13, 2018 | location = UK, Nottingham}} </ ref> Classical social evolution is most closely related to the work of Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer of the 19th century (the content of the word "survival of fittest"). In many respects, Spencer's "cosmetic evolution" theory is more common with the contemporary work of Charles Darwin than the works of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Auguste Comte. Spencer also developed his theory several years earlier than Darwin and announced. However, there are good examples of social institutions, and Spencer's work may be classified as social evolution. He emphasizes that society progresses with time and that progress has been accomplished through competition, but individuals, not groups, are the unit of evolutionary analysis. Social and biological phenomena