Traces of Marxism in the Philippines

Marxism thinks that the present society is a byproduct of the history of all class conflicts. From the complex classification of feudal lords, clergy, merchants, craftsmen and slaves, it has been reduced to two conflicting groups, bourgeoisie or oppressor, proletariat or suppressed. Bourgeoisie can not continue to exist without changing its production method. This includes expanding the market, "creating the world with its own image" and establishing connections around the world to make society dependent on bourgeoisie.

Marxism analyzes the main dynamics behind the development of human society from the early tribal society to the present age. The way Marxism pursues this winding path is called historical materialism. With this scientific approach, a series of irrelevant and unexpected events can be understood, not history, but as part of a clear understanding and interrelationship process. This is a series of actions and responses including political, economic and social development as a whole. It is a matter of historical materialism to clarify the complex dialectical relation of all these phenomena.

Functionalism and Marxism can be traced back to the theory adopted by sociologists in the 19th century. Marxism came from German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883), and functionalism originally came from Auguste Com (1798-1857). It was then further developed by Emile Durkheim (1858-1917). Functionalism theory depicts society as a structured system that forms a whole by a series of interconnected parts (or units). These units are systems in society such as family, religion, education. These institutions are essential for maintaining harmonious and orderly management of society. Early functionalists such as Durkheim often used analogies between society and human-like organisms. Society also works because the body works reliably with all organs. Functionalists are proposing a consensus theory that social values ​​are learned through people and institutions with different social values.

Essay.com/ In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism.

In this article I will explain the two sociological aspects and explain the similarities and differences between the two major theoretical functionalism and Marxism.

Marxism has developed into another sect and ideology. While sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxist concepts, while at the same time no longer stressing or refusing other aspects of Marxism, different schools place more emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism . Several variants of Marxism mainly concentrate on one aspect of Marxism as a decisive force in social development - production aspects, classes, power relations or ownership - other aspects of the argument are less important , Or the current study irrelevant Critical Similar despite the similar assumptions, different Marxist schools may reach conflicting conclusions. For example, different Marxian economists will explain the contradictions of the economic crisis and the different predictions about the outcome of these crises. In addition, various variants of Marxism use Marxist analysis to study various aspects of society (eg popular culture, economic crisis, or feminism).