"In your philosophy, heaven and earth are more than dreams" (Shakespeare, 211). The quotation from William Shakespeare's "The tragedy of Prince Denmark Hamlet" presents a very good idea. It shows that in our modern philosophy, we are not even pulling out factors leading to the nature of things around us. Our philosophy focuses on the concept of causality. Regardless of whether people are aware of this, every point they claim is based on one reason and / or its influence. This is not necessarily important, but most people are too late to analyze the true relationship between the cause and its impact. David Hume did a wonderful job. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of some kind of knowledge, found a series of emotions in his mind, and believed that the causal relationship in nature arises from the combination of the two kinds of impressions. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

David Hume is an insightful philosopher and thinker and has shown us the problems we are constraining and what we are making the human nature a reality. Specifically, Hume is trying to persuade us to understand the facts. In this fact, we are based on life, form the custom on certain matters, and we are surrounding How do you adapt to the other things? After all, we do not know how things develop We can only assume past experiences, things will be customized and become customary through causality and casual language. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

For thousands of years, the mystery of consciousness has plagued humanity. We feel pain, hunger and other countless feelings, but this is a fact. We all know that we are conscious, but nobody has found out whether the human body is organized in a specific way leading to consciousness. The fact is that the existence of consciousness, the nature of knowledge can not be denied, regardless of the lack of a specific systematic de facto organization to explain it. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher known for her reputation as an essayist. He is an influential empiricist, a human being is a group of people who do not have a true self (this is called the theory of deterrence), and morality is not based on moral principles but based on emotion I will. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a British mathematician and physicist who built the foundations of classical mechanics and calculus. According to data from the Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Newton developed a movement and universal gravity law that improved understanding of the world of Copernicus. B. Introduction of David Hume's "Bundle" The outline of the theme (written as a response to Descartes) is drawn by a time council named David Hume as an illusion, and humans name it self. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. General Concept Study This busy term decided to focus on David Hume and W. K. Clifford Theory. David Hume is a very famous philosopher and takes the approach of attacking certain items he has strong opinions. He is a philosopher who attacks us as a simple thing that humans accept and gradually believes over time. First we start with his vision of David Hume and induction and generalization law. Then we will enter W. K. Clifford "I belong to (278) Then I will detail the criteria outlined by lock to explain the concept of persistent self.If you hurry from lock inference, I will introduce David Hume's self-concept as a bunch of ideas The juxtaposition of the self-essential proposition shows that John Rock's persistent self-view is flawed in considering David Hume's self-concept.

David Hume is considered a reputable and influential philosopher, and its method of experience provides a basis for many ethical principles. Although the expressive nature of Hume and the complexity of intellectual thinking are incredible to most readers, the importance of justice is considered important and even today's society has many values ​​and ethics . It is related. The discussion of Hume's moral virtue in his book "Exploring the Moral Principle" explains the importance of justice that is related to further examples of moral evidence and moral differences . (I) The precondition for the distribution of justice is a condition that must be met in consideration of the distribution of justice. David Hume's "situation of justice" is an example. Most modern theorists agree with Hume's view that the problem of distribution justice arises only when the substance is relatively short of (to the resources that people need). It is not wealthy, extremely poor). Under such circumstances, there are contradictions of identity and contradictions between individuals, so we need to seek necessary and potentially fair resolutions of the principles necessary for assertion of contradiction. As suggested above, the interpretation as a competing argument that balances with distributable justice-assignable ones reflects the approval of the idea that distributed justice emerges only when justice is obtained ing. I have direct responsibility for this. In his judicial affairs, David Hume places great emphasis on the distribution of social property. Hume believes that only the concept of property can give social justice and other social virtues. According to Hume, justice is an important social virtue whose sole purpose is public works. In order to show his view on how property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples. Utopia Society as an example David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience.

In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience. In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge.

Practicalism, empiricism, and practicalism of David Hume are based on the philosophy that experience has to test and retest the idea and experience determines the reality. The practitioner also does not believe in the existence of absolute truths and values. David Hume said: "We can not draw evidence from the fact that we are very carefully watching, if we doubt, we can not be convinced" ("Theory" 2645). Hume's empiricist ideal is the root of early pragmatism and in our reality there is nothing to be confirmed and everything perceptible must always be qualified to find a place of reality . Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three anchor points; the only source of true knowledge is sensual experience, unreliable unless it is based on a strong foundation of sensual experience It is inappropriate knowledge route. There is no evidence that natural thoughts in mind are learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

Hume: Bad practices and virtue philosophy are studies of general and basic problems such as existence, reality, knowledge, values, human thoughts, and questions about languages. "Therefore, I am a famous quotation that attempts to define this study very easily, and the philosophers quoted are the widely considered fathers of modern philosophy, the 17th century French Renée Descartes ". David Hume is a Scottish of the 18th century and is considered by many to be the most important British philosopher in history. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators.

David Hume - Response to early criticism of naturalistic meta ethics, political science and psychology David Hume. Based on Houston's "Last Conference" at the bar at Princes Street in Edinburgh, I suggest that Kant and Moore are loyal to the intuitive and cautious basic concept of the traditional ethical ban did. I called this interpretation of Hume's compatibility strategy "naturalism". In what sense is Hume's claim "naturalistic"? I think there are two very different "naturalistic" feelings that can be applied appropriately to the discussion of Hume on freedom and necessity. The first and most important meaning is that it involves applying the experimental reasoning method to this "controversial problem". As we have seen, Hume is interested in explaining the circumstances in which people are responsible (ie explaining the "traditional mechanisms" that create moral sentiments). Thus, Hume's compatibility strategy must be understood in the general context of his efforts to introduce "a method of experimental reasoning for moral subjects". In this article we will focus on two alternative interpretations of Hume's compatibility strategy, the "classical" interpretation and the "naturalistic" interpretation, for a basic comparison. According to the classics, efforts to express the relationship between Hume's moral responsibility requirements and free will will be understood primarily from his view on the conceptual logic of "freedom" and "necessity" You should. . It is said that free and responsible behavior must be triggered by the agent. Therefore, there is no incompatibility between free will and determinism. On the contrary, free and responsible behavior (logically) requires a causal relationship. As so described, Hume's discussion involves (a priori) observations about the logical relationship between the important concepts involved in this controversy. In other words, one of the main goals of Hume is to explain what people are responsible for.

In the "Survey on Understanding of Human", David Hume shows how to reasonably present the reasons for future events. According to historical experience, Hume 's factual understanding. Based on this theoretical basis, Hume continues to prove that as a human being, we can only infer about what will happen to the future based on past experience. But he pointed out that we believe that using past experiences to prove what will happen in the future is reasonable and that we are wrong. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case, the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives.

David Hume and his idea began his view by observing "various preferences and opinions spreading to the world". This diversity is seen by people with the same background and culture of the same group and becomes more prominent in "from the countryside and the distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to taste, Hume refers to the impression and emotional reactions associated with beauty and ugliness. His idea with David Hume began his opinion, and they observed that "there are all kinds of preferences and opinions in the world." This diversity is found among people of the same group with the same background and culture. It is more evident in "distant country and distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to hobbies, Hume refers to the impression or emotional response associated with the first part of Part 8 of the "Human Understanding Study". He suggests that he must stem from his false assumption that he defends his position and that any discussion against his point of view can essentially perceive necessary connections. Hume's position is related to his general view of causation. David Hume, the early philosopher of Scottish Enlightenment, met Adam Smith in 1750, and Hume had a great influence on the construction of Smith's economic theory. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he is skeptical as to whether you can "see" the cause of the microscope - Smith also calls the economy of an important invisible element he calls "invisible" A hand to avoid a mystery. "It's not the kindness of a butcher, a winemaker, a bakery, we are looking forward to dinner, but they are interested in their own interests," Smith wrote. "We are not for their own human nature but for ourselves to solve ourselves for their self-love, we never talked about their necessity, but on their advantages. As we understand today, it is not entirely "free market economics". Myth is not clear yet

When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. Comparing the different perspectives of one's will and the sayings established by the moral values ​​of David Hume and Emanuel Kant show that although their moral theory is limited, there are still some advantages It was. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

For the moral sentiment in Appendix I, David Hume wants to find moral reasons and emotions. Through five principles he finally reached the conclusion that reason is not positioned in the moral concept but only helps emotions about moral issues. The reason can be true or false, but these truths or lies apply to facts, not morals. Then he thinks morality is a direct result of emotion, or feeling of inner feeling of human beings. Moral indifference is a complete lack of moral sentiment or silence. Without these moral feelings and emotions, our moral system can not exist. David Hume (1724-1776) insists that rationality can not be the basis of our moral system. Hume pointed out that this does not infringe rationality, but tends to hurt the world's fingers. He also acknowledged that choosing to completely destroy himself does not violate rationality. So what is it that disturbs morally? Our moral feelings and emotions. Hume insists that the reason should be a slave of feelings, but I believe that this effect is mutual. We need to shape our moral feelings through rationality and our rationality needs to be alleviated by our moral sentiment. Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation.

Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main purpose of philosophy is to explain and justify why we believe what we are doing. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". Head David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his mistaken argument about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

In this article we will discuss the discussion on human understanding by David Hume (1711-1776), Section X, discussion on miracles, and whether it is reasonable to assume the existence of a miracle. I will first discuss why the existence of miracles is important and how miracles are related to understanding the laws of nature. Next, I will see how Hume believes that believing miracles is unreasonable. Then I will dispute this argument. I believe that not only is reasonable but also a necessary condition for a loyal life. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." . In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in

David Hume explains how you can not predict the future with a human understanding survey. Our experience and inference tells us that the object is functioning in a predictable way but we can not prove how the object is based on future previous interactions. After biting pizza we are looking forward to a pleasant taste. As our past experiences have proved this, this pleasant taste is predictable. Even though we think that the behavior of a pizza can be predicted to be the same as previous experience, it may only explode when chewing. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. Both are in violation of the design theory and the design theory is a rationale for the existence of God or one creator; but in Hume's experientist and Marx atheist they attack the design theory in different ways, Eventually I draw the same conclusion. It is not a god. Karl Marx developed criticism of capitalism in capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and development throughout history. Criticism involves Markus' most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. It was written in the 1950s, but its value still plays an important role in the globalized world and remains very important in the 21st century. Criticism of Karl Marx 's political economy provides a scientific understanding of the history of capitalism. Karl Marx is one of the most controversial figures in human history. Marx has built the foundation of the darkest era in Eastern European history and has written several books on philosophical themes known as "communism". The life of Marx, the philosophy of Marx, and the philosophy seen through the Bible are very important for Christians to understand the ideology of communism. Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. - Religion is a common theme connecting people of all races and backgrounds. It gives people meaning and brings hope to desperate people. Religion transcends culture and time, raised people who choose to believe in higher power and take life in the hands of holy ones. Although all religious practices and ways of worship are different. Religion has a major purpose of leading people to pursue a moral and courageous life. Various views on various religious beliefs on the planet and famous religious studies. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber to work on the paper. Two sociologists and philosophers discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most sociologists of the time write about the role of religion in society, and observations of Karl Marx and Max Weber were particularly relevant to our curriculum. Religion is one of the major social ideologies of influence. Max Weber, Karl Marx, Emil Durchem In general, religion is one of the social-oriented theories and has some influence on the social stability of society. This is because religion is the driving force of social supervision and unstable dynamics of change. Max Weber, Karl Marx and Emile Durchem were still very influential people in the 19th century.

Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume is the final stage that people experience before taking life is "disorder, weakness, ignorance, stupidity", these features are evident in their heads, for his own decision I believe I will kill him. David Hume left a paper on suicide after his death. Most of them are about suicide as an insult to God. Hume believes that suicide is no longer a rebellion against God, it is not the life of a person who dead or changes the position of something around a person otherwise. He reduces the time it takes to argue that this is an insult to others or to others' responsibility for themselves. Hume argues that suicide is compared with retirement from society and it is claimed to be a complete hermit, but this comparison does not seem to prove that children and families after suicide become vulnerable. Regarding his liability, he thinks that everyone thinks suicide is stupid unless they first consider other options, but he sometimes reveals that suicide is desirable. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? It is a miracle. Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles are often from undeveloped countries and witnesses often create conflicts of interest and oppose each other's experiences. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally.

"The human brain starts working from the moment you were born until you stand up and speak in public." - (George Jessier) People try to elucidate the brain and what is going on inside This is what the philosopher is trying to achieve today, but you can ask a question. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This problem occurs because the philosopher really wants to know what is happening in the human brain. This can also be traced back to "knowing" and believing what can be proved fact. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

Before mentioning Hume's philosophy, the easiest way to explain the concept of empiricism seems to be the most appropriate. Before Immanuel Conde conquered transcendental idealism, the school of epistemological thought was divided into rationalism and the above empiricism. The former thinks that knowledge is congenital and logic and reason is the main way to acquire knowledge. Instead, experientists believe that knowledge is based on senses and experiences; in essence, humans are whiteboards. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In the introduction of "humanity", Mr. Hume states as follows. "It is clear that all sciences are more or less related to human nature," he says, "Human science is also" the only solid foundation of other science ", and a logical discussion on the scientific approach Said that the experience and observation as a foundation of it is necessary. In this aspect of Hume's thinking, the philosophical historian Frederic Coptstone says that the purpose of Hume is to apply human science to the method of experimental philosophy (which means the term of natural philosophy), and " "It is a methodological extension to extend the summary to Newtonian physics." David Hume stated that Bacon is famous for introducing human essays. He acknowledged that "late British philosophers" including Rock, Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Hutchison and Butler began to make human science a new foothold. (Hume 1978: xvii). As Bacon once advocated "rebuilding" science, Hume urged the necessity of "reform" in "human science"; this issue may be "more important" than in natural philosophy ( Hume 1978: xvii). Indeed, Hume further stepped forward, suggesting that "human science is the only solid foundation of other sciences", including mathematics, natural philosophy and natural religion, the former suggests that human science dependent on other sciences I am researching. (Hume 1978: xvi)

Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are seeing David Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan and "Exploring the Moral Principle". The human race seen by David Hume in verse 3 gives a human perspective. Hobbes' opinion is that survival is important for our nature, but it can not explain altruism. We use various survival level theories to cover the theory of Hobbes and use the foundation of Hobbes to explain the larger behavior. Hume gave a scene that does not prove to be direct productive, but he caught selfless behavior. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century believed that people were born to be kind. It is better if the philosophical view of Thomas Hobbes (a supporter of the all inclusive government) and the pessimistic view of his personal interests is not the basis of all our actions ... We will rest. He believes that we were born with the virtue of kindness, trust, and devotion. This "voluntary order" need not be forced by a larger human resource or the theological force or institution of theology but is more efficient and orderly, individually and collectively. Thomas Hobbs, George Berkeley, and David Hume are the main representatives of empiricism and have developed complex empirical traditions as the basis of human knowledge. It was John Locke that was acknowledged as the founder of this method, he said "Papers are focused on human understanding" (1689), the only real knowledge that human thought can obtain is experience I argue that it is knowledge. The sun center model includes the free displacement of the earth to circle around the sun (not as being considered the center of the universe). Copernicus' research of the solar center model of the solar system in 1543 tried to prove that the sun is the center of the universe. The discovery of Johannes Kepler and Galileo gave theoretical credibility, and its research peaked at the "principle" of Isaac Newton, which established the laws of motion and the universal gravity that dominated the scientists. View of the physical world of the next 3rd century.

David Hume's article "Taste Standards" is one of the most respected works of so-called aesthetics. He is known for other works such as "humanity", "exploring human understanding", "exploring moral principles", but they all have limited nature of the role in human life is showing. This subjective viewpoint also appears in "standard of taste". Aesthetic judgment is based on personal feelings rather than personal reasons. In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong?

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

The way the concept exists in your mind is a concept worth studying on its own. Many philosophers look for the origin of ideas in the human mind, and are showing various reasons. As a philosopher, Hume proposed that his own framework of human thought is appropriate. For Hume, the development of perception is either an understanding of the outside world, or recall of these events or a change in their memory. Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Assumption "Hume 21" through Hume 21, Hume means the ability of things like buns of lump, "supporting the human body" (Hume 21) I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create -

David Hume is a philosopher of imperialism who revolutionized scientific debate and methodology in a skeptical way. His argument about the way people exist today is important to explain how we learn knowledge and how to use it to explain it. Through the theory of perception of his mind Hume helped pave the way to a higher state of human consciousness. He divides thought perception into the impressions and thoughts of two different groups. Through these two categories, Hume streamlined the depth of human understanding. David Hume is one of the most influential philosophers of the present age. Hume believes people get knowledge through experience and we should be skeptical about all other knowledge. Hume analyzes every aspect of life, but may be best recognized for his theory of causality. Hume established criteria for determining causality. These criteria explain his doubts about causality and why he reached the conclusion that man can not find the truth. In order to fully understand the analysis of the causal relationship of Hume, first you must understand that he emphasizes the sense. Hume is skeptical to everyone who has nothing to do with our senses. Hume divides human perception into two different categories: impressions and ideas. The impression includes feelings and emotions. They are ingenious, powerful and brilliant than ideas. They are what we see, hear, feel, love, or dislike We live in the world of experiences and inventions We live in the world that inherited knowledge acquired and created by David Hums, inventions, knowledge and special characters hundreds of years ago. Experience, but the 17th century is a fascinating era, major changes in social science, medicine, mathematics, and philosophy are realized, this is the historical era of Europe and the whole world. Supporting the rolling and mobile revolution are people without academic background, but they are all discovered through research and experiments. Through this semester I will do my best to submit the best education and career I have gained while studying this course. It is David Hume that I use his theme. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Summary of David Hume and Max Scheler's emotions and values: Although a philosopher tends to eliminate the importance of every feeling towards moral life, other philosophers tend to devote them to moral life and value judgment It is at the center of the theory. In this article we will discuss two classic positions of the second type, the conflict between Hume and Scherrer's position. The ultimate goal of this conflict is meta theory - in particular it involves analyzing the relationship between emotional concepts and values ​​in this value judgment theory. Max Scheler (1874-1928) developed philosophical anthropology from the material ethics of value ("Materielle Wertethik") and opposed Emanuel Kant's responsibility ethics ("Pflichtethik"). He explained the hierarchical value system which further develops the phenomenological philosophy. Scheler explains that the human mind is composed of four layers as well as the organic layer. However, in his explanation, the human spirit is opposed by the principle of human spirit. Scheller's philosophy forms the basis of Victor Frankel's logic therapy and existential analysis From 1900 to 1920 Max Scherrer was the successor to Husserl's phenomenology, which was the hegemonic form of German philosophy of the day. Scherrer tried to apply Husserl's phenomenological approach to various topics. Since 1920, Scherrer has built the foundation of philosophical anthropology competing with phenomenology and other philosophical fields as a philosophical field. Husserl and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) were then the two most prestigious philosophers in Germany and their criticisms of philosophical anthropology and Scherrer had a great influence on this subject. Philosophical anthropology is trying to connect various developed anthropology to the specialization of science. Max Scherrer distinguishes science, philosophy, theological anthropology, or interpretation of the basic structure of human activities, but these are ignorant of each other. Philosophical anthropology regards itself as disciplined discipline to prevent "disappearance of the center" of the thought described by that disorder and its followers. Traditional beliefs are broken down under the guidance of God, the king and feudal leader, God or nature, so today there is a lack of general direction. Like Protagoras, men are currently the only viable means. By adjusting and interpreting fragmented knowledge, philosophical anthropology aims to have a new understanding of the basic qualities and possibilities of human beings.

What is the first: chicken or egg. David Hume has advanced through the logic of the idea behind rationality and effect. He critically analyzed the reason behind these generally accepted views. Causal relationships seem to be completely logical and common sense, but he describes our impressions and thoughts and why they are believed. The progress of Hume begins with the first conclusion about the definition of the first reason and the theory of causality. As a result, the argument about Hume's cause-and-effect traces the same path as his epistemology and these two views supplement each other, so it is impossible to accept epistemology rather than rationally The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. Because for observations "constant relationship" of events, A "conventional continuity", and Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows".

In this article I will defend the moral theory of David Hume. This states that morality is a perception that comes from our emotional reaction, like visual and auditory. Morality is not objective, as morality arises from our emotional reaction rather than rationality. Furthermore, the emotional basis of morality has been empirically demonstrated in recent psychological studies, and the brain regions related to emotion are most active in making moral decisions. Our discussion is divided into two parts: morality continues to be part of our moral judgment, but it is mainly due to our emotional reactions, and finally what is caused by everyone It means. Moral theory asserts the existence of its own moral view through which we perceive good and evil. According to the early Scottish version of this theory such as Frances Hutcheson () and David Hume (), the discussed concept is reflexive based on emotion or emotion, which is secondary, perceived behavior . Or it is our usual feeling state. Moral theory may be described as intuitive theory; more generally, "intuitionism" is used only for the following purposes. For Hume, morality is independent of religion. He elaborated on the secular theory of virtue and moral meaning, as well as the moral obligation independent of God's order. Hume's interest in separating morality from religion may be due to his factual view that it is fundamentally conceptually unique and independent. But certainly at least part of his motivation to do so is a sense of peace. In other words, if religion is not clearly separated, they will distort morality. Hume is familiar with certain rational and sensible people like the bishops Joseph Butler and Sir Isaac Newton, but they have some sort of religious belief, but that is because religion is superstitious I believe it is enthusiasm. Really necessary estimate. What is true moral value? In fact, religious fanatics obscure moral obligations or may conflict with it When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

The problem of miracles is an ancient problem that has existed in most of human history, but over the past several centuries this problem has been solved to a certain depth. A great empiricist philosopher, David Hume, is one of the first people who tried to explain why they were created (from the human point of view from Hume), and why people are trying to believe it was. This is an important field of research and as more knowledge about the nature of the laws of physics has increased, more and more (not a few) miracles proved to be known as an exception to the laws of nature. I will proceed as follows. First, I answer the claims of Hume 's miracle belief. Then I present some conditions and the belief that a miracle will happen is correct if they match. Discussions on miracles in Hume's work fall into three categories. The first argument attacked the coherence or intelligibility of the concept of magic. The second thing accepted for discussion is that the concept is consistent, but for reasons of miracles it is believed that there is absolutely no evidence to believe in miracles. The third attacked the reliability of the report from people claiming to have witnessed a miraculous event. Abstract: David Hume believes that he discovered an "eternal check" for miraculous beliefs. However, carefully examined, there are some flaws that are wasteful of evidence. One example is Hume's confidence that a miraculous explanation is not always naturalistic. The purpose of this article is to see Hume's proposition and discussion on Chapter 10 "Miracles". The investigation of human understanding is wrong and shows that his argument is inconsistent. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in

David Hume's "Humanity Theory" divides the human virtues into two categories. It is natural and man-made. He considers that the law is artificial and invention of mankind. Therefore, he pointed out that justice is an artificial virtue and not a natural virtue. He believes that humans are inherently moral - they are born with a constant moral mind and in order to understand our "moral idea", study human psychology To do is the key. In this article I will explain the difference between Hume's nature and artificial virtue. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume identified two such virtues, one of which is the natural virtue. It is essential to understand the difference between this series of virtues and artificial virtues before exploring why Hume places great emphasis on artificial virtues and why they are distinguished from global virtues. Hume explains the virtues of nature as virtues as human beings in the natural environment, except for the social structures around us. Indeed, they are the values ​​we have in an environment without government, judicial system or social structure like monarch. You can see that Hume develops his thought using Thomas Hobbes' "state of nature" and other ideas. Social constraints, contracts, and Hume use it to understand what kind of virtue we might have in such an environment.

David Hume's causal relationship in the investigation of human understanding David Hume said in a survey of human understanding, "There is nothing to suggest power or necessary connection in any particular cause-and-effect relationship" (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume proposed in the second quarter that it arises from the impression that all ideas use feelings (11). Therefore, in order to have the concept of power or "necessary relationship", the impression of such a relationship must exist in a single causal relationship, and if there is no such impression it is called "necessary relationship" It is impossible to have ideas (52). I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Because all discussion is through Hume 21's future influence hypothesis' secret power '(Hume 21), Hume means the ability of objects like buns of chunks,' ... I will support the human body. "(Hume 21) Hume claims to have a foundation When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding.

I explain that Hume's argument seems to have reasons to explain why miracles are impossible. I agree with Hume's argument, I think it is correct; but I dispute some of his views. The central point that Hume tried to propose was that someone's testimony was unable to create a miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century

David Hume has expressed strong support in the fourth section of the "human understanding survey". Hume said: "As a universal proposition I will take freedom to declare that I do not accept any exceptions, knowledge of this relationship is not obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances When discussing 'knowledge of this relationship', Hume refers to causality. Since all such knowledge is suspicious, this sentence can easily be regarded as being skeptical. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

David Hume's causal relationship in the investigation of human understanding David Hume said in a survey of human understanding, "There is nothing to suggest power or necessary connection in any particular cause-and-effect relationship" (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume proposed in the second quarter that it arises from the impression that all ideas use feelings (11). Therefore, in order to have the concept of power or "necessary relationship", the impression of such a relationship must exist in a single causal relationship, and if there is no such impression it is called "necessary relationship" It is impossible to have ideas (52). I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Because all discussion is through Hume 21's future influence hypothesis' secret power '(Hume 21), Hume means the ability of objects like buns of chunks,' ... I will support the human body. "(Hume 21) Hume claims to have a foundation When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding.

David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong? David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " In the article on Hume 's taste criteria, he believes that art works for a long time, and some facts of some people make them a real criticism of beauty or quality. In this article, Hume argues that one art work is objectively superior to the others, and some people are correct in his argument that identifying them over others is actually better Let's see. The explanation of the true judgment is completely unrealistic, in fact it hinders our understanding of the good taste. Although Mr. Hume's true judgment is an extraordinary individual, he considers the value of comparing several opinions before deciding the social dynamics of our beauty assessment and the quality of a particular work It is not put in. Although I propose the idea that the judgment of the work can not be decided by my opinion, in fact it can only use enough opinions to draw conclusions.

I am sorry for incestuous incestuousness with humans, not dogs. Whatever a person kills a deer, whatever it is, if he kills another person, that is wrong. Why are these lines being drawn between humans and animals? David Hume has answers to these questions. Many philosophers like St. Augustine believe that humans are morally different from animals because they can infer that Hume believes that it is passion and emotion that determines morality I will. In his book "Theory of Human Nature" he says that sin and virtue is not the fact we observed, but from the happiness and pain that felt in response to behavior (Hume, 218) . According to David Hume, the wisest of these philosophers, Reason is only a slave of passion and "Hume Creatures" has a completely unconscious moral sense of thinking. After moral judgment, rationality continues, it is too late to be too late. Hume claims that we derive moral sentiments from "direct emotions and better internal consciousness" rather than "assertive and inductive linkage". However, although moral philosophers are not happy, they climb to Emmanuel Kant, who brings the torch to Plato by trying to derive the objective basis of morality. Kant argues that moral requirements are based on objective criteria of reason. He took even important names and called the moral foundation "absolute order". Unethical behavior is irrational as it violates sacred CI. Kant believes that ethical behavior means starting with responsibility When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. By comparing different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the maxims established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant, I discovered that there are several moral theories. Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind".

Definition of the Two Reasons of David Hume The definition of two reasons in "Humanity" and "Exploration of Human Understanding" by David Hume was the focus of his controversy on the actual view of causality. The majority of the discussion focused on the lack of consistency between the two definitions and the definition as part of the larger text. Regarding the latter objection, Hume points out in the advertisement of the author that the paper "predicted research before leaving the university", so it can be supplemented by asserting the explanation proposed in the survey. He did not announce it. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this It is usually defined in three different ways: material quality, biological and personal identity. In an article by David Hume and John Locke, they studied the meaning of identity with three simple sub theories. Both agreed on specific functions, but the other characteristics were totally different. Are they identified as the same person over time? Hume and Locke wrote a paper on concrete assumptions about identity. The author provides various examples to the reader

Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. He lives in Ninewells, a family-owned land near Edinburgh. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

Empiricism (try something for yourself): All knowledge has to pass the doctrine of sensory communication; there is no natural idea that it is enough to remember (Ie Plato) All knowledge can be reduced to feelings. In other words, our concept is simply to feel the image. In short, there is no other knowledge besides knowledge gained through perceptual observation. Remember, according to Descartes, the first thing I know is my opinion. At that time, he wondered if this fictitious world would exist, so he began with his own idea and then became a reality next (not the other way). Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

This paper critically examines Hume's assertion on knowledge / existence of substantial ideas. This denial is rooted in his epistemology, which is based on the theory that complicated thinking lacking a corresponding impression is created by three relations, imagination, memory, and impression, three relationships, similarity, continuity, and a constant connection includes. The key to my criticism is to point out that these relationships are such that only unified agents over the long term can interact with them in a way to explain them in a hurry. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

Hume's mental game Human thought is a very complex machine. There have been a lot of attempts to explain how human thinking works, but it has not been successful. After reading Hume I agree with many of the things he explained. In my opinion, Hume is the closest thing to exposing thought. Robert Hume handled much of what Decarte spoke of in his work. The difference between Decarte and Hume is that Hume "resolves" many of the "wrinkles" left by Decarte. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this

Hume is the first thinker to point out the meaning of "representative perception theory". He inherited this theory from his rationalists and predecessors of the empiricist. According to this view, when one says that he saw something like an apple, it actually means that he has spiritual thoughts, images and impressions in his mind. Such data is an intrinsic, psychological, subjective expression of what I think is an external, physical fact. As a theory, Utilitarianism is usually thought to begin with Jeremy Bentham, but David Hume says "Investigation of moral principles" (1), Francis Hutchinson (David Hume also has a similar view on the study conducted Utilitarianism tells us that action is moral because it is the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people It creates us to distribute happiness among all beings and tells us to see which distribution maximizes happiness, which provides a systematic answer.Past 2 During the century, Utilitarianism had a great influence on the field of practice in politics and economics, so that Utilitarianism influenced the lives of modern society, especially public policy, to make people's lives better Not because, not so much So, what is important when doing political deliberations? In a survey of moral principles (Appendix II - self-love), David Hume proposed six objections he calls "selfish assumptions." It can be said that it is an ancient psychological self-interest. First, Hume believes that self-interest is to moral sentiment. It may motivate people to take care of others and motivate others to behave. These moral sentiments include love, friendship, compassion and appreciation. Second, psychological self-interests try to reduce human motivation to a single cause. It is a "futile" job - "Simple love ... It was always the root of many miscalculations in philosophy." Third, it is clear that animals act with kindness, and if they acknowledge that animals can behave selfishly, how can they be denied in humans? Fourth, the concept we use to explain benevolent behavior can not be meaningless; sometimes the agent obviously bless her although she has no individual interested in the wealth of others I will. Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this thesis are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis.

As an experientist and a skeptic, he demanded that "human reasons, blind and narrow boundary weaknesses be fully understood." (131) There is no right to speculate theology because humans have no historical knowledge of science or the universe. He is "the only scientific subject that can contradict contradiction, material compliance, causal, expanded, spatial, temporal, and behavioral thinking, in essence varying amounts of substance, certainty or evidence" It continues to ask for. In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion

Introduction Briefly, aesthetics is a study of art, aesthetics, and judgment. As society often does not regard art as a functional effort, this series of studies seems pointless, indeed, Oscar Wilde, a professor of aestheticism who is a famous aesthetician and said it, said. "But this sentence is misleading, the same man said:" Aesthetics is a sign of pursuit of beauty, which is a beautiful science for people to explore the relevance of art. David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong? In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " In the article on Hume 's taste criteria, he believes that art works for a long time, and some facts of some people make them a real criticism of beauty or quality. In this article, Hume argues that one art work is objectively superior to the others, and some people are correct in his argument that identifying them over others is actually better Let's see. The explanation of the true judgment is completely unrealistic, in fact it hinders our understanding of the good taste. Although Mr. Hume's true judgment is an extraordinary individual, he considers the value of comparing several opinions before deciding the social dynamics of our beauty assessment and the quality of a particular work It is not put in. Although I propose the idea that the judgment of the work can not be decided by my opinion, in fact it can only use enough opinions to draw conclusions.

In Hume's dialogue on nature's religion, we are to discuss the purpose of God and its nature, more specifically the three roles that humans can infer God and its nature Was introduced. Three words, Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes, are involved in discussions on this issue, but they all help to support their views on this issue. The focus of discussion was the "design theory" proposed by Cleanthes, Demea and Philo tried to destroy it. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction.

When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. We outline the philosophical views of these two philosophers and then compare them to show that philosophy is balanced. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. - Plato was born in an aristocratic family of Athens, Greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, was thought of as the descendant of the early king of Athens, and his mother Perictione married Pyrilampes. When young, Plato is always interested in political leadership and eventually becomes a disciple of Socrates. He follows his philosophy and dialectic, and it is believed to pursue the truth through questions, answers and other questions.

David Hume is a British empiricist and believes that all knowledge comes from the senses. He opposes the existence of the original concept and points out that humans know directly only what they are experiencing. These statements had a major impact on his argument for the existence of a miracle. This article explains this discussion and critically evaluates it. In the Hume Study of Human Understanding, "Section X" miracles violated the laws of nature "to define and debate like miracles", and the determination of experience has enacted these laws "1. I proceed as follows: First, I will respond to Humes' claim of miraculous beliefs. Next, I present some conditions and the conviction that a miracle will happen is correct if it matches. Discussions on miracles in Hume's work can be divided into three categories. The first argument attacked the consistency or clarity of the concept of magic. The second accepts to demonstrate that the concept is coherent, but it is reasonable for miracles there was not enough evidence to believe the miracle. The third attacked the reliability of the report from those claiming to have witnessed a miraculous event. There is no room to cover many discussions against the existence of God, but there are other arguments that are easily pointed out. Miraculous arguments especially provide reasons why it seems supernatural elements to say, or more discreetly provide a reasonable skeptical naturalistic view of reasons to provide special events have started. This discussion attracts the attention of many philosophers, especially the refusal of miracles of David Hume. The main content of the discussion is how to explain the principle of evidence, the most uncommon historical events to understand the laws of nature to define miracles Hume did a series of arguments for belief in miracles, but his main points are as follows. I believe that reports of miracles are impossible, as these reports are always offset by strong evidence of nature's law. For example, suppose a mayor and city official witnessed a true miracle. As they reported, the car crashed to the town hall, leading to the collapse of the wall, but after a few seconds all the bang bang walls are floating in the air, reassembled as before. Should we trust their report?

David Hume, together with Hobbes and Rock, is considered to be one of the three major British Empires and lives at the end of enlightenment. The Catholic Church is losing control of science, politics and philosophy, Aristotle's view of the world is swallowed by a more mechanical perspective. Galileo found that the theory provided by Copernicus is correct, that is, our earth is not the center of everything, but the celestial body, including the earth, is hovering under the sun. There are many mathematicians. Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation. Like Hartley and Smith, David Hume (1711-1776) combines moral emotional explanations with utilitarian virtues. The third part of Hum's "humanity theory", more generally, the argument of morality in the investigation of moral principles attempts to answer the inner questions about the meaning of good, righteousness, justice, and virtue It is. People and behavior, men psychologically praise and nurture morality at the expense of their own interests, rules that can be used to judge moral disputes and to support judgment on others. Hume has a clear and good meaning on these topics but his argument shifts carelessly from one problem to another, especially from semantic problems to motivational problems, and to the transformation of moral semantic theory did. Nursing ethics was originally developed as an alternative to Kant's morality and utilitarian moral theory, but it is thought to relate to many other moral theories such as African ethics, David Hume's sentimentism, Asia, etc. I will. Richmond 's Virtue Ethics, Merlot - Ponty' s Phenomenology. , Levinas Ethics and Confucianism. The most important of these comparisons is the relationship between nursing ethics and virtue ethics, but nursing ethics is sometimes classified as a kind of virtue ethics, care is central virtue. Identification of virtues promotes a tendency to classify nursing ethics as virtue ethics, but this classification system is universally accepted.

Descartes, Plato and Hume's Thought A direct starting point for Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is only a principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily things themselves, but on them, in one world" (Chaput, C . This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. In contrast to experience, rationalists think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conception followers eventually return to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What? David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes believes in three types of ideas, namely birth, coincidence, and imagination. He said that God existed because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. Meanwhile, Hume believes that the idea comes from one impression, an impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes that imagination does not help humans. Descartes' definition of thinking exists in thought, only things that represent others are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thought that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This idea can be explained in two ways. Classical philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, Rock, and others all understand emotions as the first concept to understand emotions without constituent elements. He believes that scientific psychology should stop thinking of emotions as 'an eternal and sacred spiritual entity like old and invariable species in natural history' (James 1890: 449). James's proposal is often called James Lange's theory and is similar to the theory provided by Lange (1885) that emotions are a perception sense of autonomy and changes in physiological conditions associated with exercise . Functions For example, when we think that we are in danger, this perception directly causes a series of physical reactions, and our understanding of these responses constitutes fear.

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

Extensive summary of Hume's virtue: Traditionally the term "virtue" was used to denote morally superior personality such as mercy, charity, honesty, wisdom, honor. Ethicists usually do not provide a clear list of virtues, but the number of virtues being discussed is very small, their moral significance is obvious. The analysis of Hume's virtue is separated from this tradition in terms of the number of virtues discussed and clear moral significance. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. According to the paper artificial virtues include justice, loyalty, loyalty to the government, and virginity. Hume devoted a lot of arguments to justice, and he believes that justice is the artificial artificial virtue at its best. Hume understands that justice mainly concerns compliance with property integrity or property practices (T 3.2.2.28). Establishment of the property system, avoiding conflict, enjoying the possession and use of various products, the social value of the treaty on property is clear. One reason for concern that justice is Hume is that it has problems with moral motives and moral recognition. However, this position makes it difficult to understand how justice is a virtue; it is difficult to find the necessary natural and ethical incentives. Public and private mercy will not do this. Because neither can simply motivate all actions. David Hume offers some narrative on moral virtue. All of them relate virtue to the audience's entertainment experience. Hume believes that the joy that is appropriate for deciding virtues is happiness being corrected through a "general perspective". I think that the general way to solve this problem is to let the account accept such accusations: it can not fully consider the virtue of misunderstanding. We think we need to see Hume providing metaphysical and moral epistemology, and Hume 's virtue account can completely explain the error.

Even in the absence of the necessary power and discretion, like the philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, Hume and the past, freedom confuses today's argument. There are two strong opposites to this topic. One is determinism and the other is "free will". All events, including determinism or belief that a person lacks free will, and human behavior, are determined by forces other than the will of the individual, as opposed to the premise of completely free will. Rene de Carte details his philosophical work through deductive reasoning and uses his reasoning system to complete his work. Many philosophers oppose Descartes. In all discussions about the theory proposed by Descartes, his beliefs have two major flaws. The first one is elusive "I" that questions and idealists David Hume question. Hume opposed Descartes' view that "I think I like this". Hume thinks that "I" does not exist in thinking but exists only in "a bunch of perceptions". Through this Hume, thought means that it consists only of what the mind perceives, regardless of whether it is reality or just a fantasy. Another major controversy in Descartes' philosophical thinking is that he made assumptions not proved in his meditation, only the hypothesis. In Descartes' meditation, he said that there is a God, but he can not prove it at all. Descartes circles mentioned by many philosophers are displayed like this. Descartes assumed that there is a god. Then he continued saying: David Hume's empiricalism Sanket Thakkar Oakton Community College starts with a philosopher based on his entire philosophy. Descartes rejects all premises and raises questions about congenital problems. He hid all assumptions and believed only things that could be proved. The purpose of putting everything in orderly doubt is that we do not know that it is true unless there is evidence. Descartes began to doubt his existence and started with that premise. "I am directly responsible for this, in his judicial work, David Hume put great emphasis on the distribution of social property, according to Mr. Hume, justice is an important social To prove his view on how virtue is and property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples.

Metaphysics in the rehabilitation of Kant and Hume, Kant read David Hume, he said, "I made him awake from his dogmatic sleep.Life problems and prejudice This furthermore Kant is his own metaphysics I urged Hume to reply in the analysis of the theory Kant does not think that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is feasible as science Decide to avoid places where Hume is located. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) "Prolegomena", Kant said he had read David Hume, "let him awake from an arbitrary sleep." This is a study of Hum's human understanding, which allows Kant to recognize the problems and prejudices of life that he had not previously realized. It further encouraged Kant to answer Hume in his own analysis of metaphysical theory. Kant does not believe that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, and decides to avoid the place where Hume is located, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is possible as science . Kant answered Hume's question directly in metaphysical analysis. Hume stopped thinking and was skeptical of the existence of metaphysics as science, and Kant accepted it. He continues to analyze the effectiveness of metaphysics as science and power in our lives. Talking about other people who can trust in the field of science, such as Copernicus, Kant developed a new way to observe the world. But like Hume, Kant encountered obstacles and could not find a solution.

Hume David Hume provided a well thought out plan for the formation of the government and its political activities. In addition, he acknowledged that certain government citizens may resist in special circumstances. But in terms of obedience and dishonesty, Hume did not give official revolutionary rules. We hope that Hume has more about the revolution and, more specifically, he believes there is a reason to carry out the revolution. Several authors like Richard H. Diss found the basis of Hume's explanation of a legitimate revolution in his historical research. Hume's report on the political turmoil of the 17th century was heavily dependent on the history of British rebellion and the Civil War of Earl of Clarendon (1646-69). Generally, Hume employs the position of a moderate royalist and believes that the revolution does not need to carry out necessary reforms. Hume is considered a conservative historian and emphasizes religious differences over constitutional problems. Laird Okie explained that "Hume is spreading the gentle virtue of politics but it is anti-frig, moderate anti-kinematic." Stuart is nothing beyond their predecessors. " "Hume wrote an anti-wage hostile action, but the paradox is that it is correct to regard a kind of established work and history that implicitly supports the control of the oligarchy regime." Historians believe that Hume is universal I have argued whether it has human nature or whether it allows evolution and development. Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensual experience Some evidence shows that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts.

Mr. Hume said that rationality alone is not enough for people to take action. He said that power to promote action is passion. Passion is the driving force of inner existence, Reason is a slave of passion. The conclusion that leads to impulsivity is caused not by rationality itself but by its guidance. Please let love, anger, fear, anxiety, jealousy act. When someone is angry, they are filled with passion. Not only that "I get angry today", but a person did not say to myself. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law. Hume and Kant are active with two different moral values. It will help explain some of the differences between their respective moral and philosophical approaches. The most important difference is that Kant regards law, duty and obligation as the core of morality, while Hume does not. In this respect, Kant's moral concept is similar to the "moral system" of Bernard Williams, which mainly defines the moral field based on the unconditional constraints and the form of inevitable duty (Williams 1985 : 193-94). Kant believes that our moral concern is a matter of liability, which is mainly imposed on us by law with its own moral needs. Like most philosophers in the eighteenth century, he believes that our moral life is deeply involved in how we maintain benign issues in our lives

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

Hume's ultimate goal in his philosophical effort is to weaken the esoteric philosophy. By focusing on a rational aspect, Hume shows that philosophy has limitations. As he does not know the limit he suggests that he use as many reasons as he can, but when he comes to the border this is the limit. He doubts that we have to research reason and find something beyond reasonable capacity. Hume started his first exam by classifying its contents as perception. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here

Summary of Hume of Dialogue Analysis on Natural Religion: Hume's Dialogue on Natural Religion (1779), like human technology and design, can be read in the same way as Cleanthes (and Philo). There are smart writers or writers that can start with the five facts of Hume's text: independence of Hume's character, indirectness of discourse of character, way of interaction of personality and way of life of them. The entanglement of Pamphilus as an internal author; and how the reader participates in the dialogue. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's book was all controversial, but his conversation was very exciting and his friends persuaded to ban the publication before publishing them to him. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's viewpoint is closest to Hume's perspective, Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume died in 1776 and the natural religious dialogue after his death was announced in 1779. Champions of the design controversy carefully watched Mr. David Hume's skeptical criticism and reexplained their arguments to counter them. William Perry was the most convincing defender of the design argument in the early 19th century. Paley's natural theology was published in 1802, the dialogue on natural religion was published for 23 years. (I am referring to this fact because many believe in the myth that is still repeated because Hume makes a surprisingly obsolete Payy's argument.) He reads Hume's conversation Actually, he also mentioned in his book, Chapter 26, page 512, "Mr. Hume, a dialogue after death". In addition, as a result of careful consideration of Paley's design controversy, he found out that he predicted and responded to Hume's major criticisms.

Extensive summary of Hume's virtue: Traditionally the term "virtue" was used to denote morally superior personality such as mercy, charity, honesty, wisdom, honor. Ethicists usually do not provide a clear list of virtues, but the number of virtues being discussed is very small, their moral significance is obvious. The analysis of Hume's virtue is separated from this tradition in terms of the number of virtues discussed and clear moral significance. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. According to the paper artificial virtues include justice, loyalty, loyalty to the government, and virginity. Hume devoted a lot of arguments to justice, and he believes that justice is the artificial artificial virtue at its best. Hume understands that justice mainly concerns compliance with property integrity or property practices (T 3.2.2.28). Establishment of the property system, avoiding conflict, enjoying the possession and use of various products, the social value of the treaty on property is clear. One reason for concern that justice is Hume is that it has problems with moral motives and moral recognition. However, this position makes it difficult to understand how justice is a virtue; it is difficult to find the necessary natural and ethical incentives. Public and private mercy will not do this. Because neither can simply motivate all actions. David Hume offers some narrative on moral virtue. All of them relate virtue to the audience's entertainment experience. Hume believes that the joy that is appropriate for deciding virtues is happiness being corrected through a "general perspective". I think that the general way to solve this problem is to let the account accept such accusations: it can not fully consider the virtue of misunderstanding. We think we need to see Hume providing metaphysical and moral epistemology, and Hume 's virtue account can completely explain the error.

There is no main source of information to understand historical events and people. Because this event contains direct information, do not worry that the data is incorrect as the author witnessed the incident there. But the main problem with the main source of information is that it covers only a part of the story. Therefore, if you have a book about the concentration camps of World War II, everyone involved in that camp will see this. It is not what happened during the actual war. Hume has responded to his work in various ways. When entering the eyes of the public, Hume quickly won a group of admirers and disciples, including Adam Smith and historian Edward Gibbons. Immanuel Kant and Rousseau praised Hume and his work very exaggerated, the former considered the only philosopher who is skeptical of his logical conclusion, the latter declared as follows. In his hometown, the only historian who wrote it fairly ... he measured and calculated human error while keeping its weak point. "But writing the full-length attack logic, reasoning and philosophical principles of James Beatty and Joseph Priestley Hume, Thomas Gray says about Hume's philosophical work," I always David Hume is a harmful writer I thought he was doing here, there are as many countries as you have. " Edward Feather first began attacking sensual problems by attacking Hume's way. As Edward Feather understands, to easily summarize Hume's forks (Osherov thinks this reading is wrong and better than George Dickel). After Feser's reply to Massimoomo Pigliucci, Feser summarized self-opposition objections as follows: Any suggestion that does not include "thought relationship" or "de facto problem" can include "refinement" It is as much as possible. And it was sophisticated. Of course, from the viewpoint of Hume, suspicious propositions include traditional metaphysical propositions. Piglici thought that Hume 's position was "one" when he first met it. However, the problem is that Hume's Fokker is the expectation of the verification principle of the positivist, and there is a similar problem.

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

There are different kinds of miracles that exist in people who have reasons to believe them. Thomas Hume thinks that the miracle is not real. He said that all "miracles" have reasonable explanations behind them and rational methods to explain them. On the contrary, survivors of environments almost imaginable will regard their existence as a phenomenon or a miracle. On the other hand, there are philosophers who reasonably understand why miracles do not exist, but on the other hand survivors associate life and death with a certain miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century Critical views of Hume's work in the 19th and 20th centuries often reflect the differences in the 18th century, but added a more detailed analysis of Hume's history and philosophical method. Thomas Jefferson declared, "If Hume is faithful, it will be the best historical fragment ever," and Hume said, "I held down the truth, lied, forged the authorities, forged the record" Added. Drich von Schlegel found a more admirable praise in Hume's words, but he also imposed on Hugh's party his own "narrow view of the principle and things is not entirely fair". Nonetheless, Hume's work - history and philosophy - has the first important biographer, John Hilbert, of their supporters Hume. Thomas H. Huxley also gave Hume a basic explanation with details of his philosophy.

In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. Supporting his model of the distribution of justice resources by combining insight into the origin and purpose of justice of David Hume and insurance based on Ronald Dokin's insurance will create a country as a matter of justice , Has been claimed. Encourage members to participate in entrepreneurial spirit. Activities to protect them from the worst effects of market economy. Justice research is usually defined by the theory of John Rawls. Justice theory focuses on the principle of logistics in society. The decisive argument of the environmental justice movement is a model to violate some of the principles of distribution of justice theory. Some modern scholars have developed a wider justice theory than the theory of justice distribution. Research on justice theories applied to environmental justice mainly focuses on "bias of distribution". In other words, research in this field is that poor communities, communities of indigenous peoples, and colorful communities are affected by negative external factors related to the environment regardless of environmental protection It is focused on the fact that there are many. In this paper, we propose a strategy for constructing modern Hume 's distribution theory theory. It will lay the foundation for my so-called entrepreneurial welfare state. - Small and medium enterprises are considered to be the main pillars of the world. For example, in many European countries, SMEs are considered to play an important role in the success and prosperity of the whole country. Most people want to achieve ownership, independent interests and personal success, starting with small business. If the plan is right, SMEs can prove very successful. Nozick classifies distribution theory theory into two categories. The first classification is whether the theory is historical or historical, and the difference is whether or not the theory considers past action / event / situation (history) (non-historical). A more important difference between Nozick's different distributive justice theory lies in the theory of patterns and the theory without patterns. Patterned justice theory refers to the theory that distribution rates are determined or associated with variables. For example, Utilitarian theory of justice will assign social goods according to their practical level of promotion, so it will be a pattern of justice theory. Patternless theory does not refer to world variables to determine who gets what. Nozick's claim to justice theory of justice is to use the example of Wilt Chamberlain to argue that they are incompatible with freedom and to discuss this.

In "Exploration of Human Understanding", David Hume first contrasts two aspects of human reasoning, two aspects of moral philosophy, or human science (Hume 1). On the one hand it focuses on shaping human behavior and on the other it focuses on rationality. The first one is simple and obvious, the others are difficult and accurate. Hume shows that a simple and obvious philosophy appears more in mediocre life; it allows humans to become more benign and encourages emotions. Hume is an experientist and skeptical. His philosophy of development is usually approached by scientists, so he believes that he can make laws for human understanding. Hume studied understanding as an experientialist and tried to understand the origin of human thought. Empiricism is the concept that all knowledge comes from experience. Skepticism is to investigate things to find things that lead to personal reasons or those that feel particular emotions without knowing what is in nature in advance. Objectively speaking, there is a delicate boundary between reasoning and people's feelings, but philosophers Immanuel Kant and David Hume seem to have a big difference in views on this issue. Both are philosophers who change their lives, and they have different views. One sees the emotions of humanity, while the other seems to be seeing rationality. Understanding philosophical anthropology One way to find ways to understand the essence of humanity by considering different methodological approaches is to think of two questions: "What is a human?" And "Who am I "Various answers are given, but the most famous philosophical definition is still a classic definition proposed by Aristotle. The essence of man is "animal of reason".

in · duc · tive · l · adverb · duc · tive · ness, noun · ti · in · adjective · ti · in · duc · tive · l · adverb · ti · in · duc · tive · ness noun · in · duc · Tive, adjective · i-in · duc · tive, adjective · in · duc · tive, adjective Collins English Dictionary - Full and complete 2012 Digital Edition © William Collins Sands & Co. Corporation 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume. The development of induction was always the secret of mystery expression and solution. In the early stages of its development, it was the secret of an old recursive mystery discovered by Hume. But after the previous mystery was solved, Nielsen Goodman discovered a new inductive mystery. Instead, this paper chooses to use the development of induction as the definition of Hume 's and Goodman' s induction concept. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and concrete hypothesis (Norton 2)

William Paley's "Discussion from the design" questions about the clock and questions about why the watch is there and how the watch is made there. He said that there must be a creator to visit. There are creators in those with designs, and creators have never seen a work. A place to wake up, a place that does not work at all. William Paley (William Paley, 1743-1805), one of the philosophical arguments about the existence of God, known as argument of design argument theory, is the most widely discussed matter of discussion. Pale, evidence advocates believe that there are signs of obvious design in natural order. It seems that things not only exist but are designed for some purpose (McGrath 2011, p. 183). But British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) strictly compromised the reliability of the Paley method (McGrath 2011, P73) and provided another explanation for this surface design in nature, In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position.

David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical about the behavior of understanding." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form to split human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article we will clarify the form of knowledge and reasoning and consider Hume 's induction which is a difficult problem for justified explanation of truthful beliefs. This division is also called "break fork". The relationship of thinking is deductive, "intuitive or performance decision" and can be found only by simple thinking maneuver "(Hume, 1748, p. 422). This group can include mathematical ideas and mathematical proofs. For example, 2 plus 2 is 4 statements. Therefore, it is unthinkable to negate these sentences, and it is logically impossible. For example, we can think of a triangle, and we all know that it has three sides. Later, since the rectangle becomes a rectangle, you can imagine a rectangular triangle and immediately face conflicts. This is a priori as it is irrelevant to the outside world and does not give us any information about the world at all. The second is the "de facto problem" after. "Facts" are words for us to understand the world and the sources of knowledge of these words are "the present evidence of our senses" and "our memory record" (Hume, 1748, p. 423). The statement of this group and the denial of these statements are not self-contradictory and can not be imagined. For example, we can say that the next house is yellow, this statement can be thought of as correct, but at the same time can be treated as false and imagine that their house is blue 2018 8/6 Philosophy / logic - inductive my thesis on recursive length questions Inductive thesis: 1208 words (35 double space pages) Evaluation: carefully selected papers open the choice of document preview 'skepticism Target. All of this can be explained by the concept of natural contradiction, proposed as a solution to the problem of recurrence in the philosophy of science. The concept is just a philosophical treatment. Philosophy (Greek, philosophy, literally from love for wisdom) is a regressive argument about the situation of general and fundamental research doubting the requirements of knowledge. The induction problem is basically a problem of what we can learn from experience, understanding induction problems is the main reason to understand Hume's philosophy, and the problem is how people explain It is related to what to do. Why are philosophers interested in computational complexity? Scott aaronson abstract Since philosophy has changed linguistics into abstract propositions, if we learn that something can be computed, we can assume that the philosopher of today The problem faces David Hume. The problem is a bit different, and it has become an epistemological question justifying the true belief about the proposition.

Perhaps Oklahoma's William is best known for his metaphysical nominalism and 'Okkam's razor'. William of Oakham was born between 1285 and 1287 and soon was named Spade in Surrey, England. Since historians know little about Occam's birth and childhood, we must infer the date by writing from events in his life. He is a medieval British philosopher and a Franciscan monk. In Occam (Beckert) Franciscan family, Occam estimated the past few years as a young age. William of Occam, also known as William O'Cham, William of Occam, is a British philosopher of the 14th century. Historically, Occam has become an outstanding opponent of Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274). Comprehensive and accused by the Catholic Church. Aquinas and Okam are different in most problems, but there are many other critics in Aquinas, and Occam does not criticize Aquinas like any other person. But for fairness, Occam was the power of great change at the end of the Middle Ages. He is a brave man with a very sharp mind. His philosophy was extreme in his era and continued to provide insight into the current philosophical argument. In academic philosophy Occam's William insists on the method and content of reform, but its purpose is to simplify. William had included some of the previous theologians, in particular most of the work of Duns Scotus. William of Oakham from Duns Scotus came up with his view of sacred total tolerance, his view on grace and defense, his epistemology, and most of his moral beliefs. But he also prescribed his understanding of universality, his reactions to Scots on the formal distinction (ie "applied to creation"), and the simplicity he admits and repented ing. It is the opposite. Ockham Razor An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

Freud believes that most instincts come from two natural sources: "Love's Desire" (Life's Instinct) and "Tanatos" (Death Instinct). "Eros" includes the desire for love, creativity, and sexual desire (sexual desire). "Tanatos" is an impulse that uses aggression, sadism, and violence. Obviously, these are hidden in the unconscious mind. Self is control of identity, adjustment of libido, and super self control. There is no way to prove that Freud's psychoanalysis theory is true. Because people can not determine the level of mind, not to mention inference of human behavior, it is no longer a scientific theory but a hypothetical theory. In 1739, David Hume approached free will through his concept of causality in "humanity theory". His position is that a causal relationship is a psychological structure used to explain the repetitive association of an event and often leads to one close to each other (explaining the natural regularity) and the other It is necessary to investigate the relationship between them in detail. Things (things) cause or require other things). According to Hume, 'causal relation' is based on weak reason. "It is just a meaning to" have to bring B for their constant integration "leaves a very weak inevitable concept. " Invitation to salvation. "Free will is influenced by the nature of man, but men retain the ability to choose things that go against their personality and desire" ("free will"). Humanity must ultimately endorse the nature of their folly from God. Man uses the place God gave them in the beginning. Adam and Eve ate a forbidden tree and forced a loving, elegant god to solve the problem. 1 Timothy 2: 3-4 says: "This is a good thing, whether fate and" free will "will influence our lives is still a very doubtful argument. Many people with religious views believe that having higher power has a pre-determined plan for each of us. What is our future? In the play, Oedipus, fate will be the determinant of life and determinants of Oedipus

Discussion on the design theory of the existence of God is a posterior theory. The term distance learning comes from the Greek word "teleos". This means a purpose or an end. This is based on the view that there is evidence of design in the world because natural order suggests opportunities more. So, this shows a designer's idea. Classical discussions on design have three premises to be concluded. The universe has order, law and purpose. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position.

Design theory about the existence of God Theology can regard the existence of God as absolutely necessary based on authority, belief or discovery, but many philosophers know that God must exist by reason I believe it is possible to prove. Telelogical discussion is also known as a design argument and merely states that designers must exist because the universe and living creatures display design elements in their order, consistency, consistency and pattern. As long as the shooter does not order it, insist that things of the world move toward the target so that the arrow hits the target. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

There are two main thoughts or methodologies on the subject of epistemology: rationalism and empiricism. These two completely different schools of thought are trying to answer philosophical questions about how to acquire knowledge. Rationalists believe that this process is entirely within our head, but experientists believe that it will be achieved through sensory experience. After reading and understanding each discussion it is clear that empiricism is the most relative descriptive position in epistemology. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Then, please argue, rationalism and empiricism, sum. The fact that philosophers can be rationalists or empiricists was traditionally used in the classification system commonly used in the history of philosophy, especially Kant's description in the first half of the 17th to the 17th century It affects the classification system. . Therefore, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were erroneously regarded as applying rational core epistemology to a common metaphysical agenda, Rock, Berkeley, and Hume erroneously reached a gradual rejection of their metaphysical claims It was regarded, and everyone consciously tried to improve his predecessor's efforts.

Thomas Robert Malthus was born in Dorking in southern London in 1766. He is the second son of Daniel Malthus, a supporter of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and David Hume. He has seven brothers and sisters, one brother and six sisters. When I was young, Malthus was moved by the thought of Rousseau and Hume and was deeply influenced. His father and various mentors educated him before entering Jesus College in Cambridge in 1784. His main subject is mathematics, he studied many subjects, won the Latin and Greek awards, and graduated in 1788. Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

Western subjective thinking has become one of the basic contents and major achievements of Western philosophy since modern times. It faced a lot of difficulties in the development process and was declared "already dead", but I think its development prospect is still bright. Historical development of Western subjective thinking The term "subject" comes from the Latin "subject", which means what forms the basis of the preceding or other thing. It refers to the process of production, the process of production, the process of invention, and the place called "west". What I call "westernization" is to create historically specific illusions where members imagine themselves as Westerners. Therefore, there is a hypothetical feature in the creation and formation of this Western theme. However, the imaginary nature of this position does not mean that it is not true, but it constitutes a significant effect by constructing the body of that subject (Ye_eno_lu 1999: 3) Beginning from the origin of Western philosophical thinking, people became interested in moral law. As Mr. Hume pointed out in this paper, "morality is the theme that makes us happy" (David Hume's "Humanity Theory"). First, the idea of ​​how to live is the problem of having the most satisfying life, "Beauty of managing the relationship between one person and another" (JB Schneewind, "Modern Moral Philosophy ") Focused on. But having a lifestyle perspective is best for everyone. As the title of the article insists, Hume's theme is humanity. He summarized his project in the subtitle: "I am trying to introduce experimental methods into moral subjects." As mentioned at the beginning of the initial survey, he defined "philosophy of morality" as "human science". EHU 1.1 / 5)). Hume 's goal is to apply scientific methods to human research. A study on the "system" of Hume's philosophy confirmed him that philosophy was in regret and that reform was urgently needed. At only 18 years of age, he was dissatisfied with a letter saying that anyone familiar with philosophy noticed that it was involved in "endless controversies" (HL 3.2). Ancient philosophers he was paying attention copied the mistakes made by their natural philosopher. They advanced the theory of "complete assumption" and rely on "invention rather than experience"

Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. Hume also advocated a discussion to support and oppose the purpose of the argument in his dialogue on natural religion. The role of Cleanthes summarizes the theoretical argument that compares the universe with an artificial machine and derives a conclusion based on the principle of similar effect and similar reasons that must have wisdom of design. It turns out that it is a wonderful machine fragmented into countless machines. Also, we recognize again that the degree of fragmentation exceeds the range that can be interpreted by tracking human's senses and abilities. These different machines, even their smallest part, can be adjusted precisely to each other, and everyone who takes it into account is admired. In nature as a whole, the adaptation of means curiosity to purpose is completely analogous to human design production; human design, thought, wisdom, and wisdom Modern argumental arguments are somewhat different from the construction theory of Paley. Paley is particularly impressed with the design of biological systems such as eyes and animals, but contemporary editorials often find evidence of design in physics. Modern discussion tends to focus on the "fine tuning" of the universe, and indeed it is the fact that in order to support life ("fine tuning") it is necessary. One of the advantages of contemporary design theory compared to Paley is that it is less susceptible to attack based on evolution theory. From the perspective of Paley, people oppose the evolution that explains the emergence of biological designs, but the evolutionary process does not apply to the laws of nature.

Final Article: Inductive Problem Inductive reasoning is the idea of ​​drawing conclusions from multiple facilities. There is a tendency to understand specific concepts to achieve ideas by building details from prior knowledge. However, this learning method has limitations. We are not always aware of specific concepts, so not all conclusions can be derived from what we know. Also, not all facilities are consistent, so there is no room to draw conclusions about the future. That is an induction problem. David Hume introduced the induction problem to the world. Induction problems argue that past experiences can bring future experience. In this article I will explain how induction problems bring more problems to philosophers, but how to bring undue solutions. Philosophers are creating new arguments. Many times these papers are challenged by other ideas. David Hume introduced inductive problems in the 18th century. He asked Hume is a pioneer of contemporary inductive research, but induction itself is a problem, and that is actually a lot of problems. Traditional problems are now a matter of reason: how can injustification be justified? In fact, here are some problems that correspond to various reason patterns. A very simple model is to regard Hume 's dilemma as a challenge, but in order to prove the induction method, it should show that it can draw real or possible conclusions from the real premise. It is safe to say that this problem should be solved without further assumptions and should not be resolved. The realization of this dead end and the diffusion of other forms of induction has resulted in more specialized projects including various enhanced premises and assumptions. The following methods show some examples of this Final Article: Inductive Problem Inductive reasoning is the idea of ​​drawing conclusions from multiple facilities. There is a tendency to understand specific concepts to realize ideas by building details from prior knowledge. However, this learning method has limitations. We are not always aware of specific concepts, so not all conclusions can be derived from what we know. - An important function that triggers science and everyday thinking is to understand the information available. Induction is a process from a specific one to a common one and derives a conclusion about the complex nature of the universe from a limited series of observations to the present day. People use a series of evidences gained through experience and use it to form conclusions that are considered to be consistent with the given facts

For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism Rationalism is often contrasted with empiricism. In fact, these views are not mutually exclusive. For example, the philosophy of science is rational and empirical. But knowledge is basically based on experience if you think that the end of the experience comes from experience through five external senses or through inner feelings like pain and happiness. Similarly, some plausible versions argue that starting from the basic principle like geometric axioms, all possible global knowledge can be deduced derived. The philosophers who discussed this point are Spinoza and Leibniz, and efforts to solve epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes brought about the development of a subjective approach to rationality. Spinoza and Leibnitz believe that, in principle, at least all knowledge including scientific knowledge can be obtained only by rationality.

This kind of argument is practical to predict the pattern of repeatedly occurring events, but they are never valid. Please think of sunrise. It lasts thousands of days every day. So it will rise tomorrow. This possibility is very high, but it is not 100% likely. Also think about the existence of the universe itself. The probability of life arising from the fusion of random forces is very low, but the correct combination of life exists only once. In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Paley wrote a paper entitled "Theory from Design." In the "design theory", Perry tried to prove the existence of superiority by developing a special theory called the teleological theory. The theoretical argument is an analogical argument based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, we are intentionally defeating Perry's claim and trying to adopt the next method. Contact Us Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. In Paley 's debate about the existence of God, "design argument", Paley tried to use his argument to prove that God is the sole designer and creator of the universe. He compares the universe with the watch and compares God with a clockmaker. In this discussion, Paley argues that the universe is quite complex and orderly so that only wise wisdom can design and create it. Paley believes that everything that shows design can be inferred that it is actually an intelligent design product. For example, if you look at your watch, you can confirm that it is designed in one of two ways. If a person checking the clock has experience using the watch earlier, it can be said that it is actually designed. If smart design marks are displayed on the watch, such as smooth surfaces and unique complex parts, you can guess the smart watch. essay.com/Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe. Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe.

In the first premise of the first part of the tenth, Philo notes that the highest God who can establish society the only way to realize religion and longevity needs some form of union did. Philo is classified as a skeptic and insists that through human emotions there is God's idea that does not prove existence and they do not use the system to have a true testimony of sacred intervention of higher intelligence. Unbounded order determines what needs to be sufficient for religion; however, in order to achieve this ideology, some kind of humanity (anthropomorphization) is necessary. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's view is closest to Hume's view, and Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's books were all controversial, but his conversation persuaded him to prohibit publication before publishing that the conversation was very exciting. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on religion in natural dialogue and religious dialogue is a literature on Scottish philosopher David Hume's philosophy. This publication is consulting with three characters: Demea, Philo, Cleanthes, the essence of religion, and the existence of God. They all agree that God exists, but there are differences in nature and attributes, and they can gain understanding of God. One of the things they are talking about is the reason for the design for the existence of God. Hume started writing dialogue on religion in 1750, but it was not completed until 1776 before he died. Publications are based in part on Cicero's publication "De Natura Deorum" (in the nature of the gods). After death in 1779, a dialogue on religion came to Hume.

Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. There are few people who start a wide range of lectures. And there is no chapter dedicated to explaining every physical characteristic of everyone. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity. Dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" Jane Austin's "Pride and Prejudice" becomes a reality through dialogue. Some people can not stop the conversation, others spend considerable time saving languages ​​when it is necessary to express emotions. Dialogue of 'pride and prejudice' is different from Shakespeare 's role in theater, characters have long monologues, conversation is more conversational, very witty and clever. - Martin Buber's "I and You" provides a philosophy of private dialogue as it explains how personal conversations explain the real features. The theme of this book is that people can explain the outline of life by tending to talk to each other, nature and God. According to Buber, people have two attitudes. Me - you, or me - it. I - you are the subject - the subject relationship, and I - it is the subject - subject matter

Definition of miracles Miracles can be precisely defined as a violation of the natural law by the specific will of God or by inserting an invisible agent. David Hume "Miracles are a favorable coincidence and their natural causes are too complicated to understand." The miracle of George Santayana is a wonderful event thanks to the Oxford English Dictionary of several hypothetical supernatural institutions. In my opinion, miracles are incidents that can not be explained by scientific reasoning, so we do not understand why and how it will happen. Here, Hume defines the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature", but the miracle of the footnote is referred to as "an intangible agent who violates the law of nature through the specific intention of God or the intervention of specific people" Define 'exactly'. The definition is more relevant, the second is to better capture the concept of miracles. In a letter written in Blair in 1761, Hume said he always has religious content as an empirical fact. "I have never read a miracle in my life" (L1, letter 188). Therefore, Hume's miracle is all that is required by taxonomy for incompatibility with the laws of nature, but it violates the laws of nature caused by non-natural substances. Explain or define a miracle; a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, not ordinary for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. If it dies, he can only define it as a true miracle. To explain the criticism of Hume's miraculous belief, you must first understand the definition of miracles. The Webster Dictionary defines the miracle as follows. Actions, supernatural events considered to be one of the actions of Christ, his divinity reveals that it is a very noteworthy performance or event, unexpected luck. . Therefore, this miracle is based on the perception of the experiences everyone is experiencing. It is based on the individual's reality and the belief he believes. It is based on internal events like what we teach and external events like direct information we heard or seen.

These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "guidance". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume. The development of induction was always the secret of mystery expression and solution. In the early stages of its development, it was the secret of an old recursive mystery discovered by Hume. But after the previous mystery was solved, Nielsen Goodman discovered a new inductive mystery. Instead, this paper chooses to use the development of induction as the definition of Hume 's and Goodman' s induction concept. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and concrete hypothesis (Norton 2)

From the beginning, the community suffers from problems caused by past human understanding. As a more sophisticated, principle belief in the existence of God during driving, to explain this confusion, the human form about their existence. Over time, excellent social, academic members have proposed several ideas of a unique understanding of complex topics like God. Students who have learned to endure the challenges of time and the theoretical explanation of these theories have been highly evaluated by this century's leading scholars. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. God tried to use his argument to prove that God is the only designer of the Creator and the Universe with the Paley argument about the existence of "design argument". He looks at the universe and compares it with a clock maker to which God compares. In this discussion, Perry insisted that the universe designed and created it, only extremely great wisdom, very complex and orderly. Paley believed that everything would appear that the design can guess that it is actually an intelligent design product. If you look at the watch, for example, it is possible to decide one of the two method designs. If you had experience before people checked the watch to see, they can say that it is a good design. If the watch showed intelligent design marks, such as smooth surface or unique complex parts, you can guess some of the smart watches again Hume vs. essay.com/Paley This is the induction argument about origins and the nature of God, religion and the universe Hume vs. Paley This has arguments of induction about the origin and nature of God, religion and the universe St. Thomas Aquinas, who knows the existence of God, uses the argument argument as one of the five ways that William Paley's most quoted argument is. Perry likened the watch to the universe and many of the parts ordered adjustments to achieve several objectives. Watch complexity, meaning intelligent design as order and purpose, he means the complexity of the universe, and the purpose of order also means its intelligent design. As he suggested, he built its argument and is an analogy argument

The biography of Adam Smith Smith is one of 18th century Scottish moral philosophers who led to impulse modern theory and his work marked a groundbreaking and progressive method, this method gradually Replace fixed Aristotle's view on invisible hands: - § "Everyone, to make the community's annual income the same size as he is not generally intended to promote public interest We must make an effort, he just did not know to what extent it would be desirable to get to promote their own interests, and as well as many other situations, he is visible Not promoting his intention not purpose at hand. Nicholas Philipson's new biography, "Adam Smith: Enlightenment Life" (Ale; US $ 32.50) 2 · We have been very successful in trying to put Smith, let us look at this person, Pull it together How to be a little financial god feelings. Historian of the University of Edinburgh Phillipson, following Rothschild, revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein, but he used events and plots to activate his life, despite changing Smith to Lord mainly Byron. One is his close friendship with philosopher David Hume (his closest colleague and his greatest influence) and a less simple embrace of Hume's notorious atheism. It turned out that the real problem of Smith is not a matter of economists. How can we become more prosperous and poor people? Even if it is a question of a philosopher, what should I do? This is a modern question. Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order of the world without God? Philosopher David Hume is an important early role in Scotland's Enlightenment Movement with Adam Smith in 1750. Hume has a major impact on the theoretical and Smith economies. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he can "see" the micro skepticism you cause - Smith also said that he is "an invisible economic mystery, invisible "I am looking forward to dinner instead of the butcher, winemaker, bakery's kindness, but I am interested in their interests," Mr. Smith said. writing. "We will not solve ourselves to their self-love, to their own human nature, our own necessities, but we will not tell them the benefits to them." It is very difficult, very Scotland, and Instead of the diameter of Calvinism. As we know today, it is not entirely a "free market economy". Myth is still unknown The 18th century economist Adam Smith's free market theory suggests that there is always a power supply to appease the demand, there is no invisible hand that can guarantee that no government does not exist . "We are not from the kindness to look forward to the butcher of the dinner, the baker's and the winemaker, but for their own benefit. Respectfully" Other promises of all other countries and countries and military alliances The best way to get rid of exotic countries to avoid open isolation policy. Historically, the feeling of the United States was strong. President Woodrow Wilson won the second paragraph in 1916 and is particularly prominent in international partnerships that will participate in the newly formed US, outside (outside) the United States (erroneously) outside World War I I promised. Prior to pilot Charles Lindberg at American First Committee, popular with outstanding performance, World War II, the committee attempted to stop US participation in the war

What is morality? This problem has bothered philosophers over the years. Is it possible to have a common ethical view? There are many questions surrounding the mystery of morality. They seem to promote every action we take. Our decision is based on right and wrong. But what exactly is it to judge what is right and what is wrong? Is this our reasonable consciousness? This is our emotion. This is a question that David Hume has been thinking about most of his life. What is the driving force of our actions? Hume's main moral sentence is the third volume of his humanitarian discourse, "ethical" (Vol. 2, "in passion"), the quest for his moral principles, and some of his essays is. To some extent, an ethical investigation reinterprets the central idea from the ethical part of the essay in a more meaningful way; however, there are some important differences. The ethical position and discussion of this paper are as follows, show the place where the ethics survey coincides, then discuss the difference between the survey and this thesis. A study on Hum's morality began with a paper and refined in his "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). His view of morality is that "verbal decision is based on moral sentiment". It does not know how to manage ethical behavior, but about feelings. The moral sentimental rhythm of Hume's morality is shared by his best friend Adam Smith, but Hume and Smith are moral reflections of their former contemporary Francis Hutchinson. It is generally affected. Peter Singer argues that Hume's argument can not have rational grounds only with morality. It is enough to give him a position in moral history. Hume's moral philosophy and his historical and religious work reflect his theoretical empiricism. In the investigation of Part 3 of this article and ethical principles, Hume defines moral judgment as a specific type of recognition that is consistent with promoting practicality or pleasant quality or behavior, and is recognized by most people. In his ambitious British history, Hume tried to completely transcend his predecessor by emphasizing attention to details, fairness, and wise attention. However, many critics pointed out that history is characterized by a strong prejudice against Hoggs, especially at the later curls, they are obsessed with the British attitude towards Scotland. Hume practices religious skepticism in works like extensive dialogue on "miracles" and natural religions.

In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument William Paley (William Paley, 1743-1805), one of the philosophical arguments about the existence of God, known as argument of design argument theory, is the most widely discussed matter of discussion. Pale, evidence advocates believe that there are signs of obvious design in natural order. It seems that things not only exist but are designed for some purpose (McGrath 2011, p. 183). But British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) strictly compromised the reliability of the Paley method (McGrath 2011, P73) and provided another explanation for this surface design in nature, In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Perry wrote a paper entitled 'Discussion from Design'. In the "design controversy" Perry tried to prove the existence of hegemony by developing special arguments called theoretical arguments. The theoretical argument is a discussion of analogy based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, intentionally trying to break Paley's argument, as follows: First, introduce the basic purpose theory argument pearly, secondly, arguments were analyzed with Paley derivation. Third, contact with Paley's argument Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. Yet, in many cases, it is confused with the discussion of simple analogy, William S. Paley from the clockmaker's argument to avoid Hume against the analogy of the world and artifacts, a more complicated design It is an argument of. I need to check the clock and I find that I found a clock on the ground Paley's argument is that the similarities and part of the deliverables to the physical world, as a reliable indicator of intelligent design What is happening in that place, I hardly thought ... About what I know, the watch may have always been there.

In the first premise of the first part of the tenth, Philo notes that the highest God who can establish society the only way to realize religion and longevity needs some form of union did. Philo is classified as a skeptic and insists that through human emotions there is God's idea that does not prove existence and they do not use the system to have a true testimony of sacred intervention of higher intelligence. Unbounded order determines what needs to be sufficient for religion; however, in order to achieve this ideology, some kind of humanity (anthropomorphization) is necessary. Dialogue on nature religion (1779) was taught after his death by his nephew David Hume the Younger. The argument between the three fictional figures about the essence of God is an important depiction of the design controversy. Despite some controversy, most scholars believe that Philo's view is closest to Hume's view, and Philo is the most skeptical of the three. Hume's greatest achievement in religious philosophy is a dialogue on natural religion, which is often considered one of the most important and influential contributions to this philosophy field. Hume's books were all controversial, but his conversation persuaded him to prohibit publication before publishing that the conversation was very exciting. Hume's philosophical project and the way he developed to do it will determine the strategy he adopted in all discussions. Discussion on causality and ethics has a preliminary critical stage in which Hume evaluates the discussion of contemporaries with his predecessor and then evaluates the constructive stages he develops his position . But in natural religious discussions the situation is quite different. Dialogue on religion in natural dialogue and religious dialogue is a literature on Scottish philosopher David Hume's philosophy. This publication is consulting with three characters: Demea, Philo, Cleanthes, the essence of religion, and the existence of God. They all agree that God exists, but there are differences in nature and attributes, and they can gain understanding of God. One of the things they are talking about is the reason for the design for the existence of God. Hume started writing dialogue on religion in 1750, but it was not completed until 1776 before he died. Publications are based in part on Cicero's publication "De Natura Deorum" (in the nature of the gods). After death in 1779, a dialogue on religion came to Hume.

Inductive is an important cognitive ability for which inference extends knowledge beyond the information available (Farrar, Raney, & Boyer, 1992). For example, if you know that an object belongs to a particular category, it may be considered that the object shares other attributes with other category members. This is essential for learning and interacting with the surrounding world and can be regarded as one of the most fundamental functions of biology. Induction occurs early in development (Sloutsky, Kloos, & Fisher, 2007). Inductive questions prove that recursive reasoning is observed from problems that are not observed. Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711-76) gave that classic expression and pointed out that all these reasoning relies either directly or indirectly on the premise of unfounded rationality similar to the past. There are roughly two kinds of problems, the first one requires natural consistency, the second one depends on the concept of causality, that is, "necessary connection". Inductive, inductive problems, also called Hume 's problem, are related to proving very basic irrational reasoning. Due to the conclusion that the next demographic member we encounter also has this nature, it seems reasonable to deduce from observation that a demographic sample has certain attributes. For example, when you eat a piece of bread, you conclude that bread nourishes you from many past conclusions, and this time it will do the same. However, bread is considered to be nourished in the past, but now it is not. The next piece of bread is like what you ate before and does not have to be an analytical or transcendental truth. How does your reasoning fill in the gap? Naturally, it appeals to the general principles people have found. However, as Hume pointed out, the future application of the previously proved reliability principle poses exactly the same problem.

I am familiar with childhood. I live with my brother Colby Winston, but I do not remember since I was 5 years old. We traveled all over Europe; Colby is a great gambler who likes to bet. He lied, he fooled, everything was changing. Colby promised me one thing, "Reagan," he said "One day in America, you are like me," I really want to believe him, but I see it happen I have never done it. But one day, fortunately, Colby won the biggest poker hand. There are few people who remember. There are some memorabilia - some books and movies - but in the minds of the public it is in contrast to the memory of the Titanic sunk two years ago. This is strange as more passengers die from the Queen (although the Titanic including the crew has more death). Why did they forget? It is widely believed that assassination of Daimyo Franz Ferdinand one month later brought about a war that began in August and brought Canadian maritime disasters to the public. With the massacre of the Western Front, many people just want to go forward and just forget the past. David Zeni, author of The Forgotten Queen, believes that other factors are working. For example, unlike John Jacob Astor of the Titanic, the queen has no prominent passengers. In a sense, it is interesting to read this niece Yvonne Hume which is a violinist John Hume (usually playing John Flum at the Titanic Monument). When he resigned from the Titanic, he was only 21 years old, left a sad family, a fiancee, and a child who was not born yet. This is a book full of information, but for any Titanic enthusiast, Titanic does not have "new" here. John is from Scotland 's Dumfries, but his illegal daughter later abandoned all relations with Scotland. Illustrations and photographs on Dumfries, and a lot of pictures of John and other family members. It is thought that Yvonne contains biographies of members of other bands. This announced death by 2000 that it was thought that "Fly" by the French Army and was not officially though everyone was aboard the ship during the First World War! In March 2011, Hume's niece, Yvonne Hume, released a biography detailing Jock's life and his fate at the Titanic. Directed by Titanic survivor Mil Vinadeen, this book is just a memorial of Hume and his fellows like a monument to his monument in Dumfries. He shared the monument with Thomas Mullin, the house manager who is also called Dumfries. Despite years of speculation about the last tune played by the Titanic, the fact remains that these people are finally trying to improve the spirit of the people on the ship.

The ability to achieve philosophical thinking through philosophical thinking is the ability to truly understand and understand everything that affects the environment and the surrounding environment and knowledge is the ultimate understanding and appreciation of the environment. Through this last understanding, philosophers can comprehend life and life more than ordinary people. Unfortunately, becoming a philosopher and even knowing philosophers may be difficult. For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Traditionally, there are two ways of epistemology. Rationalism, that is to obtain knowledge through reasoning, to obtain knowledge through empiricism, that is, sensory experience. There are several extremist philosophers, but most people think that both knowledge methods are necessary, to some extent they support and amend each other. I will explain in detail later. Rationalists pay attention to what they call the necessary truth. This means that something is true and must always be universal. Another term that means the same is a priori truth. Transcend is Latin 'preexisting' and you know that it must be a real transcendental truth before you begin to observe the world that senses reveal to us. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

This article presents two different perspectives on the subject of design theory. In particular, I will explain the support to William Paley's design controversy and support for Bertrand Russell's design controversy. After introducing different perspectives, I appreciate the discussion to prove that William Paley is debating stronger. There are several forms of design discussion. The general form of design theory begins with the basic idea that part of the universe is such as to indicate that they are designed and have purpose. In the 1800s, British philosophy and moral philosopher William Paley wrote a paper entitled "Theory from Design." In the "design theory", Perry tried to prove the existence of superiority by developing a special theory called the teleological theory. The theoretical argument is an analogical argument based on the similarity between two different themes. In this article, we are intentionally defeating Perry's claim and trying to adopt the next method. Contact Us Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. In Paley 's debate about the existence of God, "design argument", Paley tried to use his argument to prove that God is the sole designer and creator of the universe. He compares the universe with the watch and compares God with a clockmaker. In this discussion, Paley argues that the universe is quite complex and orderly so that only wise wisdom can design and create it. Paley believes that everything that shows design can be inferred that it is actually an intelligent design product. For example, if you look at your watch, you can confirm that it is designed in one of two ways. If a person checking the clock has experience using the watch earlier, it can be said that it is actually designed. If smart design marks are displayed on the watch, such as smooth surfaces and unique complex parts, you can guess the smart watch. essay.com/Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe. Paley vs. Hume This is an inductive argument about the origin and nature of God, religion, the universe.

We will explore various attitudes toward marriage in pride and prejudice. In the era of Jane Austen, marriage was mainly based on charm and compatibility. Women have the right to choose their husbands, but the status of society and wealth is an important part of their decision. In "pride and prejudice" we see many different attitudes and reasons for marrying in one sex. Jane Austen grew up in a family I love to read novels. This is a new writing concept different from poetry and drama. Compare and contrast various attitudes toward marriage represented by different personality of pride and prejudice. "Pride and prejudice" is one of the most famous novels in British literature history. Created by famous writer Jane Austin in 1813, his novel examines the nature of love. The overall tone of the novel is very light but serious. Proud and prejudice is a loving story about marriage. - Q: Compare and contrast the two proposals and their responses of Elizabeth. A. In "pride and prejudice", Elizabeth, the main female character, is very proud of the main male character Darcy. This is because at the first meeting, Elizabeth's pride was hurt because he said that he was harmed by Darcy. Results are brought. Cady Davis Bradshaw ENG 261 Dancing in the dialogue of "pride and prejudice" on October 9, 2014. In "Pride and Prejudice", Elizabeth Bennett and Darcy changed dramatically their attitudes towards each other. Darcy is dedicated to Elizabeth, but she denied this because of its low rank with the family. Elizabeth believes that Darcy is arrogant and interferes. Through the dialogue of these characters, they discovered real concern for each other. - David Hume is a Scottish philosopher living in the 18th century. Hume is now at the turning point of philosophy by infamous skepticism. He insisted that he was a moderate skeptic, but all philosophers later felt the result of his argument. His criticism has influenced various themes that Hume seems to eradicate. One of the themes that Hume attacks against his argument is the concept of individual identity.

18th century philosopher: Relatively "enlighten" or "realization era" is the era of all progress and reforms throughout Europe and Europe. There was great progress in the fields of science, philosophy, mathematics and logic. Most people attribute these results to social critics of that age (also known as philosophers). These philosophers were controversial thinkers and pioneered the intellectual movement of the 1700s. They are often criticized and criticized by many others, but they insist on their beliefs. In the center of the enlightenment of the 18th century, there was a gently organized activity of famous French thinkers in the mid 18th century, the so-called "philosophy" (eg Voltaire, De Allenbell, Diderot, Montesquieu). These philosophies constitute an informal society of letters participating in broadly defined awareness projects such as the Encyclopedia project (see 5 below). However, there are other education centers noteworthy noteworthy of France. Moses Mendelssohn, General Electric Lessing, key figures including German enlightenment (Death Crown, Christian Wolf), famous Scottish enlightenment (key figures are Francis Hutchison, Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Reed) And Emmanuel Kant are also the center of thinkers of enlightenment and enlightenment scattered throughout Europe and the United States in the 18th century. Another time of major change is the 18th century or Age of Enlightenment. Despite its presence in Europe, the origin of enlightenment is closely related to France and its philosophers such as Voltaire and Rousseau. Enlightenment was inspired by the main discovery of the scientific revolution of the 17th century. It was during this time that the idea of ​​scientific revolution was spread and spread by philosophers (intellectuals of the 18th century). The age of enlightenment of the 18th century was born most accurately from the scientific revolution of the 17th century. The seeds planted there will bloom like Age of Enlightenment. A philosopher may be the most influential person of this era. The philosophy of the 18th century was influenced by the great achievements of the great thinkers of the 17th century such as Newton, Galileo, Kepler. As mentioned above, these thinkers are pursuing discovery in the glory of God. However, since philosophy has ideas all over the world, it is entirely against any religious intervention. Philosophers are critics of the world in which they live. They are most interested in criticizing politics and religion. They do this in the form of literary texts such as books, leaflets, encyclopedias.

Answer: The history of inflation in India: India is initially high and low inflation. Except for 1956, the inflation rate of the Republic of India was originally less than 10%. Watch the complete answer with ... Historically, large amounts of economic literature have focused on the causes of inflation and its impact. There are various ways of thinking about the cause of inflation. The majority of them are divided into two major fields. Inflation quality theory and quantitative theory of inflation. The quality inflation theory depends on the seller's expectation of accepting currency, so you can exchange it later as a product of the buyer. Quantitative inflation theory depends on the equation of money quantity related to money supply, the speed of currency distribution and the nominal value of exchange. Adam Smith and David Hume proposed quantitative theory of money inflation and quality theory of production inflation. According to studies that have been done so far, the cause of inflation varies, which leads to the complex thinking of economic experts who believe that inflation is caused by quality or quantity theory (macroeconomics, item 1) . Quality theory is that the goods seller hides the goods only when the demand is high and the quantity depends on the country's money supply in circulation or distribution. One of the main reasons for inflation is government activity; this is when the government uses extra money to respond to specific crises. An increase in domestic excess supply of money lowers the value of money, and commodity prices rise from this decline, leading to inflation (Mishkin, p. 68).

Influence of Media Beauty Criteria on Women's Self-Esteem Under the daily fight against women's liberation and advertising pressures and influences, women of all ages are physically and psychologically required to obtain the best appearance or image I will be forced to suffer. This is not limited to a few people. Because girls wear the same clothes, cosmetics and accessories as their favorite star, you can see the work of high school television advertisers every day. They may also try to imitate the model they see in Youth Magazine. In a recent survey, advertisement has an adverse effect on women's self esteem, and mass media seems to have a greater influence on women than men. 1930's - Beginning of mass advertisements and fashion magazines - Since men have increased the importance of their "beauty" by 40%. Women increased the importance of a nice-looking husband by nearly 80%. In 1996, her husband 's women rated "cool" than men, and my wife looked "beautiful". However, more people are obese at any time in history. Wearing "sloppy" is standard Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election Influence of Media Beauty Criteria on Women's Self-Esteem Under the daily fight against women's liberation and advertising pressures and influences, women of all ages are physically and psychologically required to obtain the best appearance or image I will be forced to suffer. This is not limited to a few people. Because girls wear the same clothes, cosmetics and accessories as their favorite star, you can see the work of high school television advertisers every day. - David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical 'contradictory triples' (from the lecture) Then, please teach frankly the self-esteem of "beautiful" people. Our pride is influenced by "beautiful" people. We create it in the environment where we live, whether self-esteem is either high or low. At work, school, and family, we are surrounded by beautiful pride. People not so beautiful have low self-esteem against the world and against themselves. The pigeon provides rich facts about self-esteem related to beauty. Dove's Pride Foundation, the company's article "The Real Girl, True Stress: A Nationwide Report on the Status of Self-Esteem" (2008) is analyzing the girl's pressure against their emotional stress. The pigeon gives many spirits to support each statement. Dove is talking about children and parents so that children and parents can participate positively. This article attracted young people, teenagers, and parents. Parents also contribute to the low self-esteem of children. Self-esteem is an important issue in the world

When questioning the possibility of an aesthetic judgment criterion, we need to consider many different opinions already existing. For centuries, great philosophers like David Hume and Emanuel Kant tried to answer this eternal question. However, understanding and interpretation of art continues to evolve. This makes it difficult to find clear and concise answers. Throughout this article, we will discuss and explain in more detail the previous views and opinions on this point, focusing on the philosopher David Hume's idea, then criticism of Noel Carroll's Hume's philosophy. The discussion on "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics is not unique to this discourse. Whether it is art, nature, pop culture or everyday objects or activities, the essence of aesthetics has always been the focus of long-term discussion in aesthetics. However, in the concept of "aesthetics" in daily aesthetics, at least two points are particularly meaningful and important. The first one is a state of physical experience. When you get sensory stimulation you can feel the smell of baked goods, the silky feel of the skin, the taste of sushi, the feeling of massage and so on. They can also come from physical activity such as running, cutting vegetables, using tools or mowing lawn. Discussion as to whether these physical emotions belong to aesthetics is not new. Part of the misunderstanding of aesthetics lies in the word itself. In its original broadest meaning, aesthetics means pleasure or painful feeling that human beings feel through sensation. In this sense, regardless of coincidence or design, all products have aesthetic appeal. The sound of closing the door, the texture of the control surface, the visual appearance of the software interface information, the smell of plastic and metal, the taste of the medicine: everything is an example of a formal aesthetic element. Over time, aesthetics has a second, more limited meaning as aesthetic research and theory. The psychological, social, cultural and philosophical meaning of aesthetics is a complex and deep subject. One way to understand the state of aesthetics in design is how to guide human perception products.

Ralph Waldo Emerson: In the early 1800s, one thought America had a sense of new literary freedom. Past colonial writers were deeply influenced by their European roots and the limitations of technology did not diversify the printed literature any longer. By the end of the 1700's, however, the American population exploded, printed words became more accessible, and newly discovered freedom in the UK created a perfect new intellectual communication environment. The writer David Hume, Henry David Thoreau, George Putnam, Frederick Henry Hedge, etc. are centered around exploring the national identity and nonconformity of many Americans. Ralph Waldo Emerson I am writing this article on beliefs and thoughts about Ralph Waldo Emerson's personality, society, government, technology, and spirituality. Emerson thinks that everyone should be with as many people as possible with as many people as possible. Whoever you are, please do not try to imagine others. If someone is a real friend, they will like you, do not worry about adapting. I will let you down with your faith. Possibility of our soul and our imagination. Henry David Thoreau tests the idea of ​​Ralph Waldo Emerson's nature by living in Walden, where he said that the simplicity of the body deepens our minds and our souls become their greatest possibilities I will discover that it will reach. Imagination is being raised to change our lives. These two people believe that nature forces them not to rely on others' ideas. Transcendence and Ralph Waldo Emerson transcendence are literary exercises that began in the early 1800s and continued until the Civil War. Ralph Waldo Emerson is a man who has an interesting and influential view of life and the universe. Emerson, along with the other great people, helped shape the essence and achievement of transcendence. Without these people, transcendence would not have anything. Two work by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, their transcendent beliefs are similar, but they express dealing with social problems. It is the opposite voice that my faith greatly differs. - Slave Movement. Although their focus is more on subjects of ethics and personal choice, they still contemplate how Americans should deal with slavery, and Americans make a decision to freed whites I will mention. Ralphwald Ralph Waldo Emerson Ralph Waldo Emerson was born May 25, 1803 in Boston, Massachusetts. In the early days of his life, Emerson traced his father's footsteps and became a pastor, but at the end of 1832 he felt he could no longer serve as a pastor of conscience. He doubts the Christian church and his teachings

Key features of cosmological argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and since then it has been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters is Leibniz. Cosmological arguments are basically discussions on causation. Its main supporter is Thomas Aquinas, but Gotfried Leibniz also proposed a simplified version of Aquinas' cosmological point. The main critics of the discussion include David Hume and Bertrand Russell who question the rationale for discussion. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God.

The main contribution to the ethical understanding of intuitionism Intuitive ethical theory basically shows that we already know that it is morally right. Intuitionism considers "good" to be an undetermined concept. The basic moral truth is objective, and they are independent of any thoughts and emotions. Therefore, we should follow our basic moral instinct to choose moral principles. The principle of intuition first saw in the Bible "When there is no law of the Gentiles, we are making a legal request in nature ... Moral intuitionism was one of the main powers of British moral philosophy from the early 18th century to the 1930s. It was notorious in the 1940s, but by the end of the 20th century moral instincts began to reappear as a worthy moral theory. Although we could not regain former advantage, many philosophers such as Robert Audi, Jonathan Dansey, David Enoch, Michael Hummer, David McNaughton, Las Shefland and others are pleased. Labels of intuitionists Moral intuitionism and moral nonnaturalism believe that there is an objective and irreducible moral attribute (such as the attribute of "good") and we sometimes have intuitive moral attributes or moral I have the truth. According to moral theory, human beings also have a moral sense to perceive moral principles or moral facts as well as physical emotions, as human beings have a physical consciousness perceiving the physical world. Important supporters of ethical intuition and moral semantic theory in the 18th century were the third of Shaftesbury, Francis Hutchinson and David Hume. 20th century: Preliminary proof of the responsibility theory of Principia Ethica and W. D. Ross (1877-1971) of G. E. Moore is the main representative of non-naturalism. At the end of the 20th century, James Q. Wilson's "Sense of Morality" (1993) reviewed this view. There are many versions of moral objectivism, including morals of various religions, platonic nature, intellectualism, cantism, utilitarianism, and some form of moral egoism and contractionism. Please note that since Platoists define moral objectivism more narrowly, it needs to have intrinsic value. Therefore, they refuse to accept that a contractor or egotist could be a moral objectiveist. Therefore, objectiveism emphasizes the origin of the reference frame. Thus, even though the framework is mistakenly combined with the reality used for the measurement, any reference frame is ultimately a transitive attribute of ethical subjectiveism form.

Partial Abstraction of Thomas Malthus Malthus 'Population Principle Group' is often quoted by Darwinian, which influences the concept of Darwin's natural selection theory. His work is unpopular and often proven to be outdated, but it actually postpones many of the socio-economic issues still being discussed: the impact of population management, food production and excessive effects . Uncontrollable illness - worry population. In this article, Malthus is said to have been proved wrong. "... Malthus's terrible prophecies proved to be wrong" (Efficiency and Fairness 211). Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. In 1819 Malthus became a member of the Royal Society and in 2 years was appointed a member of a political economic club including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, died on 29th February 18, 1834, Roquery near Surigord, UK, February 13, 1766, St. Catherine, Bath, Summer, best known for his theory, British economy In the vicinity of Seth, a scholar and a demographic society, population growth tends to exceed food supply, and human refinement is impossible without severe reproductive limitation This idea is often called Malthusism. His father was a philosopher and a skeptical friend of David Hume and was influenced by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. His book Émile (1762) is about something about educating his son It may be the source of liberal thought.The young Malthus received education at home most of the time until he entered Jesus College in Cambridge in 1784. So he studied many subjects , He won the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

The problem of evil in philosophy I am considered to have the god of the world who is always responsible for everything that happens in our daily life. This belief is most meaningful to me and makes me feel complete. But I also know that some people in this world do not believe in the existence of God and have logical arguments like evil to support them. Philosophers such as Hume and Maggie believe that if God is gentle, omnipotent, and omniscient, he will not let evil exist. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Perhaps one of the oldest and most challenging theological problems in Christian philosophy is to ask why the world has so much evil though God was omnipotent and perfectly kind. It is often referred to as "problem of evil" in philosophical world, or "Cong question" as C. S. Lewis said. Numerous theological and philosophical arguments, books and seminars are studying this problem. There are many reasons for people to check "painful problems" - some are sincere doubts, some are outside their painful heartache. By finding answers to this question, while many people discover new aspects of God's personality and deepen their faith in God, others simply face this problem to abandon their faith did.

Indigenous son's naturalism and determinism "Today's big Thomas and its thugs are strangers but they hate them because they are afraid they do not know the reasons they are blind It is an incompetent pawn that exercises social power in a way. "This sentence reflects the most radical influence of the criminal racial discrimination situation in the United States. However, perhaps the most important role of this part is that it embodies the overall philosophy of light naturalism or social realism. Perhaps the most important argument about naturalism and free will is Peter Strawson's 1962 paper "Freedom and Resentment" which transforms the subject from its truth or free will of determinism into its Hume's argument. Rational "truth" which is completely independent from determinism. Or free will paper. This is, of course, a resting position, as we abandon the natural beliefs and there is no reason to bring sympathy for others, feelings of appreciation and resentment. Surprisingly, this famous Strawson article mentions only about Hume. This is a footnote that Hume denied "reasonable" induction. Therefore Mr. Stawson said that according to the so-called reaction attitude, there is no reasonable denial of moral responsibility. This discussion led directly to the subcompatibility of John Martin Fischer. Strawson is a "pessimist" - a true moral skeptic - a ranking for "optimist" - clearly compatible - and I want to harmonize them. Would you like to read this article? Or are you bound by the laws of nature? David Hume described the problem of free will as "the most controversial issue of metaphysics". The initial investigation of this ideology created several philosophical views supported by contemporary thinkers. The deterministic view is based on strict causality theory and denies the concept of free will. On the contrary, liberalism opposes this and supports the notion of free will and denial. The position that everything about us can be attributed to the laws of nature and the environment of our predecessors is called determinism. There is a philosophical controversy about compatibility (or incompatibility) between determinism and free will. Whatever this philosophical argument, if reliability is true, everything about us is ultimately beyond our control. There are two general correspondences to this problem. Firstly, some people reject the principle of control to maintain the way we do ethical evaluation.2 Secondly, we change the way we do ethical evaluation and maintain the principle of control To make it

Thomas Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus wrote "Papers on Population Principle" 200 years ago. We believe that the world's population will grow faster than food. This will have disastrous results for general human welfare. At that time the world population was 250 million, now it has increased to about 6 billion people. Despite war, plague, famine, fashion, this still exists. Until recently, world food production has caught up with population growth. In the mid-1980s, world food supply was equally distributed among all members of society, with population of 7 billion people, each person can earn 11 pounds per week. Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788. Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834

He believes that David Hume is a British empiricist and all knowledge comes from sensory experience in the end and that all of our thoughts are from previous emotions and reflections. The explanation of the relationship had a big impact. In this article we will look at Hummus's explanation of the causal relationship and see if any versions of the causality view can be defended. Before looking at the regularity of causality, it is important to look at the reproductive principle of Hume as the view on his causality is relevant. 154 mils (1911: Chapter 10, Section 10, Section 1). Unlike 155 Muller, it is noteworthy that McGee does not support Hume's traditional causal relations view. In particular he believes that it does not capture the important aspect of our causality concept, the counterfactual relationship between its effect and its cause. Mackie believes that "causing B" usually means "if A does not occur, B will not occur," and we believe that regularity of causality can not be dealt with fairly. This is the concept. Please see. Mackie (1974: chapters 2 and 60, page 77). 156 The difference lies in the question "what the description of the causal relationship means" and "what constitutes the causal relationship within the object". See Mackie (1974: 77). 157 Mackie (1974: 64; 1965: 37) 158 Mackie (1974: 62 and Chapter 10). Some people think that only events, wealth, or facts may be the cause There are two major types of causality theory: Hume's theory (as "ordinary wording") and causal realism (as a causal mechanism). According to Hume's theory, causality is completely constituted from empirical facts between observable variables; there is no need for a potential causal relationship, causality or causality. Causal relations scholars view the concept of causality and the power of causality as fundamental, and claim that the work of scientific research is to obtain empirically correct theories and assumptions about their causal mechanisms. Let's consider various arguments about this sentence. X causes Y. An important element of Tizam's view is that there is a difference between the causal relationship of events and the causal relationship of agents. In the former, the causal relationship leading to the event is another event. In the latter, there is one person who has a causal relationship with the event. With this characteristic, Tisam's view is often classified as a form of liberalism. Another basic element he believes is that when a person moves freely he will do something without a combination of events, conditions, or events and conditions. (Clearly, there are no events or conditions that are sufficient causal conditions for him to fail to do this.) In this aspect of his point of view, it may be regarded as incorporating uncertainty.

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, one of the most outstanding philosophers of the last century, wrote in his special novel "Little Prince" in 1943. 'As you finish washing and dressing every morning, you need to lean against your planet. "In other words, Little Prince has free natural freedom, but he still needs to be responsible for maintaining harmony with habitat, beyond personal responsibility. I believe that the government will take action to achieve equal opportunities and equality for all people. The government is responsible for alleviating social illnesses and protecting civic freedom, individuals and human rights. I think the role of the government should be to ensure that nobody needs it. Liberal policy emphasizes the need for the government to solve problems. Women have the right to decide what will happen to their bodies. Because the fetus is not a human life, it does not have another personal right. The government should abort the taxpayers for women who can not pay tax. Deciding on abortion is a personal choice for women who are fit for their body and the government must keep this right. Women have the right to receive affordable, safe and legal abortion, including several abortions. One of the important functions of the government is to define and distribute property rights. The courts and government agencies will help to define and protect these rights. The triad of property law, contract law and tort law provides a fundamental set of legal rules enabling protection from ownership, voluntary transfer, and involuntary transactions. The explanation of humanity of David Hume defines three basic rules of nature: "stability of possession, relocation of consent, and fulfillment of promises" (17).

Whether the emotions have ethical significance. The ethical meaning of emotion is potentially a huge and difficult topic. There are several positions that can be maintained: 1 moral judgment (positive or negative) can not be reasonably composed of emotions. 2 Emotions, like actions, are praised or condemned for morality. 3 Emotions are accoliated or condemned by morality, but they are completely different from the way they behave. 4 Emotions are key players of value, and rationality is purely instrumental ("rationality is a neutral technique to value"); therefore, moral judgment depends on your own emotions and yourself You should focus on your emotions correctly. There is an ancient philosophical argument as to whether morality is a matter of reason or emotion. Modern psychologists agree that moral decision-making requires rational and emotional judgment. As Professor Paul Thagard points out in the article on this issue, "When people express strong support or opposition to various actions, moral judgment is often very emotional, they are also reasonable. It depends on whether cognitive evaluation as part of emotion has been completed. " Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation. Humans are very emotional creatures and our emotions are easily developed by the logical thinking of the cloud. When people are attractive to feelings, they try to use logical arguments to stimulate emotional reactions. That's why we pay high rates for weddings, holy Valentine's Day and something like a baby. It can react to positive and negative emotions to achieve the desired response. Observation: Because we live in the era of huge digital distraction, it may be headline news. This example is based on actual blog posts that cause fear by project failures and speculators losing money. If we leave it there, we will remember the feelings of fear that may affect future judgment. In this example, no logical discussion or evidence supporting the stated in the title is provided in the content.

Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

"It is far from giving power to viewers, not to competitors - These [realistic] performance ultimately achieve social and nonhumanitarian behavior, so the smallest common divisible maximum possible outcome It will be "(Sexton). Timothy Sexton's strict comments on real television may be a bit extreme, but they are a widely acknowledged view that real television is a major failure of society as a whole and the society collapses (or it is so) It is based on. Although real television may not be the most useful form of entertainment, I believe that the transformation of social norms from idol worship to self-propagation will create a real environment. I left a reference line from elementary school that should be one of his most famous quotes: "Because I said impossible, I told you the wrong things in some respects We must do it. " That word defines Holmes and everything else that Doyle and Watson have given us. As the passage of time continues, Rand Al Thor becomes a dragon's regenerator. Canon did not promote Holmes into the body of God. In the Victorian era, such movements will be heresy. But Holmes is indeed far beyond his contemporaries in Scotland. He became the most famous detective in Europe. The government from France to the Netherlands asked him. The pope personally asked for help. We know that he has repeatedly supported the British throne and government. His reputation spreads widely, both authorities and individuals are appealing to him. In the detective, his achievement is almost like God. You may have heard the famous quote of the philosopher RenéDescartes: "I think, so I am." This is a famous quote that summarizes his argument to prove his existence. It seems wonderful, but thinking is not enough to prove or accomplish the purpose. Be sure to act. Any action. Please give me feedback immediately. After all, we are material creatures. While constantly evaluating how the environment functions, the meat and blood of the nervous system A famous proverb is "I think myself." David Hume, an experientist, wants to explain knowledge based on non-theology. Hume believes that there is no a priori concept and that our concept is not born, but an experience derived from ideas. He believes that these ideas can be divided into impressions and ideas. He believes that human beings learn through impressions, and if there is no impression, then there is nothing to think about. Unlike Descartes, Hume is everyone's view

The foundation and structure of the design controversy about the existence of God concerns creators and designers who set things and plan everything today. Unlike cosmological arguments, "design theory" is simple and easy to understand, the steps are simple. The main argument the Design Argument claims is that everything in nature seems to be gathered together in the right way. Discussion of the design theory of existence of God is also called a teleological controversy, I believe that the universe is not just a coincidence opportunity, but to do it. This is God. This discussion is a vision because it is thought that the observation of the natural world has the conclusion of the designer. The belief that the universe is designed by God is caused by things like the four seasons, summer, spring, fall, and winter, this year is changing. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. Both Hume and Perry discuss very strongly, but in the end it will conclude to distinguish which philosopher has a stronger position. One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

However, the copyright law varies from country to country, and the copyrighted work of the country which accessed this site may still be protected by copyright. Before downloading this work, it is your responsibility to check the copyright law applicable in your country. A paper on human understanding, 89 John Locke, was compiled and annotated by Alexander Campbell Fraser (New York: Dover Press, 1959) for overture, biography, criticism and history. After that (unless otherwise stated), the paper is cited in ECHU and the chapter number is written according to the convention of book / chapter / subheading. 93 Rock sometimes despises the prophecies of the Old Testament, and these prophecies do not agree with his view on abnormal God's revelation. For example, "Brought about in the usual sense of God and mankind is evident in the Spirit of God in the Old Testament, or it is assumed that the Spirit of God comes to the art of textile and embroidery in educational places Must". Inspiration Now, "Religious Writings", Edit. Victor Nuovo (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 38 "Papers on human understanding" is research based on John Rock's knowledge and understanding of humans. It first appeared in 1689 (although the date was 1690), it was printed under the heading "Papers on Humanitarian Understanding". He expressed his birth mind as a blank state (he did not use real words, but tabla lasa) and then filled it with experience. This article is one of the main sources of empiricism in contemporary philosophy and has influence many awareness philosophers such as David Hume and George Berkeley. John Rock's Human Understanding Papers In John Rock's "Papers on Human Understanding," he distinguishes between the various ideas that we can imagine with object perception. Locke separates these concepts into primary and secondary quality. Any criticism for this distinction is necessary, otherwise perception will be coincidental. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbs believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the right form of civilian government should pay attention to common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom and personal property.

Inflation Causes There are three main reasons for inflation. Demand - Promote Inflation Cost - Promote Theoretical Demand for Inflation Money - Promote Inflation ================== === == This type of inflation depends on excess demand Caused and exceeded the total supply. Simply put, to "track too few items is too much demand." This is due to the extremely strong growth in aggregate demand, which occurs when the total supply does not correspond quickly enough, leading to price increases. Historically, an enormous number of economic literatures have focused on the causes and their impacts of inflation. There are various ways of thinking about the cause of inflation. Most of them are divided into two major fields. Inflation quality theory and quantitative theory of inflation. The quality inflation theory depends on the seller's expectation of accepting currency, so you can exchange it later as a product of the buyer. Quantitative inflation theory depends on the quantity of money related to money supply, the speed of currency distribution and the equation of nominal value of exchange. Adam Smith and David Hume proposed quantitative theory of currency inflation and qualitative theory of production inflation. According to research that has been done so far, the cause of inflation varies, which leads to confused thought of economic experts who believe that inflation is caused by quality or quantity theory (macroeconomics, item 1) . Quality theory is that the seller of goods hides the goods only when the demand is high and the quantity depends on the circulation or flow of domestic money supply. One of the main reasons for inflation is government activity; this is when the government uses extra money to respond to certain crises. An increase in domestic excess supply of money lowers the value of money, and commodity prices rise from this decline, leading to inflation (Mishkin, p. 68). We wrote many questions about inflation in the article: How does money supply influence our inflation rate? Inflation is the cause and influence of inflation. One key to understanding inflation is the multiplier of money. "Score reserve system" Because banks only need to use a small portion of deposits as "spares" to offset potential withdrawals, banks can lend the bulk of deposits to earn interest I will. This will increase multiples of money supply due to the multiplication effect. This "lever" is effective in every direction.

Visitors: Although God wants to prevent evil, can not you? Then he is helpless. He's okay, is not it intended? Then he is evil. Is he capable and pleased? Then, where does evil come from? Can not he help? So why are you calling him God? "Why do not we talk about the Old Testament? Will not you explain all the stories of the Old Testament to me? Wait a moment, it's rape, homicide, slavery, homosexuals and There are a lot of people killing the gods, we should not rape or possess 10 slave slaves, he will be depressed Epicurus said that God hopes to prevent evil and can not do it or can not do it, or does not want it, or does not want it, or is pleased or not pleased, or is willing to delight. If he is willing and helpless, he is weak and it does not match God's personality. If he is competent and reluctant, he is malicious and does not adapt to God's personality. If he is glad and can not do it, he is not a god at all because he is a vicious and weak person. If he wants to fit God alone and is capable, what sources are evil? Why did not he stop them? (Lactantius, de Ira Dei (313 AD); Epicurus's first evil problem version formula Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. In his dialogue on nature's religion (1779), David Hume cited Epicurus to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but is helpless And is he helpless, does he have both abilities and intentions then is it evil? Can neither he nor help, then why is he calling him God? , The God of a personal Christian is considered to be a logically contradictory quality These atheists are proposing deductive arguments against the existence of God God is the integrity of the creator We insist on incompatibility between specific features such as status, invariance, omniscience, totipotency, omni-directionality, transcendence, personality etc. Personal existence), justice, justice, compassion

Is there a satisfactory way to adjust omnipotence and loving God and the presence of evil of nature? (Ie not evil caused by human free will) abuse. One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined from this tradition. If he exists, he will cease from evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

In addition to believing these things, Payne also chose to explain why he does not believe in traditional Christian faith. This is the reason he chose not to believe in the necessity of proof by the scientific revolution and experiment. One example is the description of the paint on doctrines and textbooks of different religions, and the reason he chose not to believe them. He answered the story of how the Qur'an was bought by humans and said that "I have no right to believe because I never saw an angel on myself" (CP 67). Rather than social reform in 1883, the use of reasons to advance knowledge through science is also known as the enlightenment of many new scientific experiments Colonial political power against God of Thomas Jayson, human and nature Harmony Elizabeth Stanton and Luklia Mott): Women are concerned about angry feminists: abolish slavery and provide new rights to many people immediate: women's rights treaty of Seneca Falls Audience: universal: who But to participate in the Seneca Falls Convention: to declare and resolve American women's rights issues in order to treat their theme equally, such as citizenship, equality, women, happiness, rights, voice, faith, and God. Teacher, country, church The role of women in society is the subject of controversy in enlightenment. The issue of gender equality is being debated under the influence of philosophers and philosophers such as John Locke, David Hume, Adam Smith, Nicholas de Conduce, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and others. Before enlightenment, women were not considered equal to men. Rousseau thinks that women are dependent on men and women should obey men. Locke recognizes extensive inequality and believes that men's ideas for women were created by men. Condorcet also challenges existing gender inequalities by defending women's political equality. The author quotes Queen Elizabeth, Russian Queen Catherine and Queen Maria Theresa as competent women.

Martha Stomas Robert Malthus is a famous economist and pastor. Born in Surrey, England on February 13, 1766, he was the sixth child of the seven children. Malthus studied at the University of Cambridge in 1784 and graduated with honors in mathematics after four years. In 1789, Malthus became a deacon of England Church and Sally's Oakwood Chapel. In 1798, he influenced the future development of society and commented on Mr.'s idea so he released his famous work "Population Principle Group". Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

The main feature of the design controversy of the existence of God existence design theory is to shift from facts about the world to the existence of God. Therefore, they are generalized and tested after the test. The Design parameter is a broad heading that actually contains many arguments. Swinburne proposed three different classifications of these arguments in his book "The Existence of God". Teleological existence can be seen in a general pattern that is currently considered to be the order of the universe. Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called a theoretical argument or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God or some sort of creator based on thought of order or purpose in the universe. Hume took the way to oppose design arguments, and Paley defended it. - The fact that a criminal is using a gun to commit a crime is the only thing that infringes the rights of innocent people who own a gun. This is a problem that is causing regional problems. "A gun is just a tool that can be used for good and evil, our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proved to be a different person One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopaediaBritannica says that this is "most popular, because the theoretical argument which is most easily available ... it deduces sacred designers and decides design evidence in nature ... as the whole as the universe It is a coherent fact as in this viewpoint, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. "

In the mid 1940's, "from the French ethics" (14c), and "from the Latin ethics" "good or bad" (good or bad), "someone's appropriate behavior in society" literally "etiquette It is related to ". Translation cause from Latin Moss (gender Morris) to "Personality", plural form, "custom, custom, moral" of "Greek" (ethics reference) from Cicero ("De Fato", "II.i) It is unknown. Maybe share English emotion and PIE's roots (1) It means "moral good according to moral rules", initially recorded at the end of 14c. Stories, people of the 1630s. Neutral consciousness to original value is held in moral support, moral victory ("sense compared to personality versus physical behavior"). Related: Morality It is worth noting that moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral expertise are logically independent of each other. For example, moral relativists are also moral genericists but not moral skeptics (such as cultural relativists like the ale sociologist William Graham Sumner of the early 20th century); moral skeptics are He is not a moral expert. (For Nietzsche, McKee and Richard Joyce they are providing "erroneous theories" to build so-called absolute universal objective moral principles); some of the special supporters Moral questionable commentator (eg his view of contemporary new Aristotle like Ross, "practical responsibility" or "proper job", Jonathan Dancy), not ethical, moral realism, Reasonable human condition 4, Kant ethics and human existence: moral philosophy research - Section 1.2, EKE and moral relativism, moral skepticism and moral specialism Moral skepticism (or moral skepticism) is a sort of meta-alien theory that all members believe that no member has moral knowledge. Many moral skeptics also propose claims of stronger aspects than moral knowledge is impossible. Moral skepticism is contrary to the existence of moral realism, especially the identifiable and objective moral truth. Michael Ruth, Joshua Green, Richard Garner, Richard Garner, Walter Sinotto Armstrong (1977), Max Stillner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Richard Joyce (2001), Pierlin, Inceidemos, Dexter Dempse, David Hume, JL Mackie (Some moral skeptical views of including defense, 2006b) and psychologist James Flynn. Strictly speaking, Gilbert Harman (1975) believes in supporting moral relativism rather than moral skepticism. However, he influenced several modern moral skeptics

Antony Flew: God's Presence and Belief Antony Flew first talked to the audience about the story of two explorers accidentally encountered the jungle garden. There are many beautiful flowers and weeds in this garden. The explorer said, "Several gardeners must be interested in this plan." The opponent objected to "no gardener". So the two explorers tried to find out who is right and what is wrong. They waited all night, but I had never seen a gardener. Then, "believer" said that there must be a gardener who is "an invisible gardener." Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind". Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

Introduction Critics have long considered that philosophy and religion can not be integrated. In their argument, they discovered that many religious groups are in conflict with the soundness claimed in the field of philosophy. For those trying to adjust these two areas, they encounter complex questions about credibility and justification. However, the work of ancient (medieval philosopher) and religious thinkers and scholars also faced difficulties, but the two outstanding works are trusted by most scholars and modern philosophers, if not all It was. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised.

The principle of Utilitarian utilitarianism "the greatest happiness" can be traced back to Francis Hutchinson and David Hume in Scotland in the 18th century. Utilitarian theory was first developed by Jeremy Bentham. His student John Stuart Mill was the most famous Utilitarian and accepted this theory. America is struggling to strengthen freedom and democracy, and to gain independence from the UK. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

British philosopher David Hume said: "The greatest purpose of human effort is to achieve happiness." Happiness is the ultimate purpose of life, and most people want happiness. Happiness is the state of mind, or happiness. After all, happiness is a state of mind. Happiness can be achieved in the following ways: mental health, education system, living standards, government governance and politics, social status and ecological health (Mankiw & Taylor, 2011, p. Pursuing happiness and meaning is the two most important motives in our life. Numerous studies of positive psychology have shown that happiness and meaning are indeed a fundamental element of happiness. Happiness and meaning are closely related to each other, and often complement each other. As we find more meaning in life, we are more encouraged to pursue more happiness, which we usually feel, more happiness we feel, more meaning and purpose I feel there. More and more research shows that there is a practical trade-off between seeking happiness and seeking meaning in life. For example, let's consider "parent's opinion". Parents often report that they are very happy with having children, but parents living with their children are usually very low in happiness. Raising a child seems to reduce happiness but adds meaning One of the most interesting discoveries about wealth and happiness, and whether money can bring happiness is that people generally prefer relative wealth rather than absolute wealth. This means that wealthy peasants and few cattle in China feel as happy as wealthy farmers holding 600 cattle in Texas. Because people tend to compare themselves with other people in the community, their happiness may increase or decrease depending on where they are compared with the surrounding people. This may be the reason why you often see a very successful brother or obligation of in-law as an opponent of a movie or book.

Introduction Project management What is project management? Project management is the core of the construction process. It is a field for organizing, planning, and managing resources to ensure that the goals and objectives of a specific project are met correctly. Understanding modern management skills and understanding the building and design processes is key to superior project management. Construction projects are set up by some people and set tasks to be completed within a certain period of time. Construction management (CM) is a long and highly demanding process. It is the foundation of every construction project and it is the key to its success. The main objective of construction management is to strictly control and monitor the progress of the project from a quality, cost, and time perspective. It covers a wide range of responsibilities and extends to many different fields (architecture, engineering, legal, software, etc.). Therefore, the role of the construction manager is considered to be the basis. In order to ensure the progress of the project we need a competent project manager with multiple abilities and skills. It is always necessary to make the latest change to build the project. In this regard, a strong team leader that is stable and promotes coordination among team members is essential. Introduction Project management What is project management? Project management is the core of the construction process. It is a field for organizing, planning, and managing resources to ensure that the goals and objectives of a specific project are met correctly. Understanding modern management skills and understanding the building and design processes is key to superior project management. - Causality is a process that occurs as a result of certain human behavior in our daily life. When you say this, it is very easy to describe it to get a definition; causality is an action that leads to something (Oxford Dictionaries 2014). David Hume, a famous philosopher with a causal relationship theme, may seem to be united in these two events, but said he can not know the nature of this relationship (T. Honderich 2001) . Project management is the foundation of all construction projects. Project managers need to acquire a variety of skills and abilities to move through the project and build functional connections with many teams. Construction projects constantly require change, and project management is the key to stabilizing the whole process in that sense. This article will introduce important concepts and principles related to construction project management.

In Alan Gewirth's "The Cartesian Circle" he rewrote the possibility of a logical mistake of Descartes's first philosophy in a previous paper. Arguments Reference to Descartes is obviously a circular reasoning, and because of the existence of God, he can have clearly distinct ideas, but the proof of the existence of God is itself clear and unique Based on ideas. Gewirth's reaction to Descartes's critic is that Descartes uses different types of certainty to prove the existence and authenticity of God rather than the accuracy of a clear and unique idea. The problem I found in his unique and clear theory is that Descartes proves the existence of God. He uses a theory of circulation when "prove" the existence of God. This circular reasoning is called Cartesian circle. The Cartesian circle is a sort of cyclic inference, on the other hand it can only be learned by clearly and independently perceiving that God exists. (Rob 200-235) This reasoning does not give concrete conclusions about the existence of God. It walked around the circle one by one. Descartes believes that only his thoughts can be deceived than his idea. So God is kind and perfect, so do not let him fool him, so God exists. In order to explain his view on the existence of God, Descartes believes that if a person can think of God as full existence, then if we can think of it in our head, He pointed out that there must be a complete existence. essay.com/Rene Explain and comment on his dreams and demons, the way of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. His explanation about Rune de Carte, deductions of dreams and demons, ways of doubt, and clear and unique trials. Furthermore, his theory (opinion) is bad and good. Descartes 'era of criticism by Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi, Descartes' psychology was deprived of its introspective features in the 18th century. The original biological psychology survived the progressive circle. In British philosophy, David Hartley (1705-1757) stands out in the movement to adapt the dynamics principle of Newton and Descartes to the need for new psychological science. His observation of humanity (1749) provides a controversial and explanatory behavioristic psychological defense based on the (Hume) unified principle within the framework of introspective advocacy Descartes. In France, L'Homme-machine (1748) of Julien de La Mettrie proposed a materialistic psychology without anti-spiritual, reductive, behavioristic compromise.

The material world is constantly changing according to eternal law. History shows that when a civilization dies, another civilization develops. However, as for disappearing civilizations, a lot of information is left without being compromised, others are left behind, some are buried in ruins and there are no traces of heritage. Without the past, we must point out that it is impossible now and in the future. Therefore, history is very important. David Hume believes that history not only is an important part of knowledge but also opens the door to many other parts and provides materials for most science. In Central Asia, Buddhism was associated with the rise of the Kusher empire from the 1 st century to the 3 rd century. They show that along the Silk Road, some kings and rulers try to transcend certain groups, tribes and religious traditions. In addition to his own king figures like Kanishka, the Kushan coin depicts Buddhism, Greek and Iranian aristocrats. Statues created by Gandharan School also incorporate elements from India, Greece and Iran. The rulers built monasteries and temples along the Silk Road, but these are often used by religious believers. One of the monasteries is located in the famous Bukhara city, which is later thought to be the center of central Islamic culture of Islam. After conquering the Indians, the Kushan Empire took over Greek, Greek, Greek and artistic Greek Buddhism. The Greeks continue to be an important part of the cultural world of India. It seems that depiction of Buddha is influenced by Greek culture. The Buddha statue of the Ghandara era often shows the Buddha under the protection of Hercules. Several references of Indian literature praise the knowledge of Yavanas or Greeks. Mahabharata praised them as "Yavanas omniscience" (sarvajnaa yavanaa); for example "Yavanas, O king, omniscience; Suras is the truth in particular is an aircraft, mathematician Varahamihira's" Brihat-Samhita " People are not pure, but they have to be respected for being scientifically trained and being superior in other aspects. "

As induction is a way to describe what leads something, when applied to inference it simply means that you gather information and draw conclusions from the observation. Since logical types are related to reasoning, you may already be familiar with inductive words. Inductive reasoning is a way to understand things by making specific observations and then leads to broad conclusions based on these observations. For example, you eat urticaria every time you eat with buckwheat flour, but if you can eat other kinds of powder well, you can use inductive reasoning to get urticaria with buckwheat flour.  - Inductive reasoning, also called recursive logic or induction logic, is an inference that constructs or evaluates inductive theory. It is usually interpreted as a generalized inference form based on individual case. In this sense, it is often in contrast to deductive reasoning. However, philosophically, the definition is subtle than a simple advance from a particular / individual instance to wider generalization. On the contrary, the premise of the inductive logical argument shows a certain level of support (inductive probability) of the conclusion, but it does not mean it, that is, they mean the truth but do not guarantee the truth. In this way it is possible to transition from generalization to individual instances. Induction refers to "general rule or principle inference method from observed specific conditions" (Flew 171). The method of induction reasoning can be regarded as the main means to prove the relationship between evidence and specific hypothesis (Norton 2). In this sense, induction processes will occur as long as evidence supports the hypothesis and can not determine its speculative certainty in this process. It is this expression of the induction method that enables the first mystery. Next is the main argument of the above mystery suggested by David Hume.

In people's lives, people meet a series of people of various qualities that make up their personality. In general, those who have a strong will have the initiative and are people who are risk takers. In addition, because they are caught up in a boring situation, they deviate from normal by finding new, different, or other ways of doing things. As philosopher David Hume, 250 years ago philosopher said, unlike people who deviate from the world, in ordinary and clichés most people continue living in doctrinal sleeping ... so they are traditional I enter the concept. usually Terwilliger Bunts of Annie Dillard's "Terwilliger Bunts One" tells the audience about fun, moving stories, speakers, unusual character of mothers and mothers in their twenties through their thirties. Story - According to Annie Dillard's statement about her total solar eclipse in her article "Total Eclipse", she has to say that she absolutely recommends witnessing the reader a total solar eclipse. I think that it is the opposite of a partial solar eclipse, but most people including me think that the solar eclipse is spectacular and dreamy. Summary Dillard's mother has extraordinary personality. She likes odd pronunciation. - Racial discrimination and interracial apartheid are taking place from the beginning, E Annie Proulx's "Accordion Crime" is exploring the situation where similar new immigrants come to America for better living. This story is widespread for about 100 years. Living in an immigrant life is very difficult Annie Dillard is the largest of her three daughters. For details on early childhood, please refer to Annie Dillard 's autobiography, "American Childhood" (1987), who grew up in the Pittsburgh Point Breeze community. It began in 1950 when she was 5 years old. Dillard's memoirs "Childhood of America" ​​focuses on "waking up" from self-absorbed childhood and immersing in a larger world. She grew up in a comedian 's house in Pittsburgh in the 1950' s. She explained that her mother is energetic and unruly. Her father taught many useful subjects, such as pipeline complexity, economics, and the street 'no street', but at the end of puberty, parents began to realize that their parents were absolutely incorrect It was.

Recent research shows that humility is related to many forms of social behavior. Some people misunderstand that humility is low self-esteem or low self-esteem, but the correct concept of this virtue is both self-esteem and other related factors. A modest man maintains her achievement, talent, and talent from a proper perspective. She has self-awareness and is aware of the limits as a person and the limits of ourselves. But humble people also face other people, respect the happiness of other people and can "forget themselves" when appropriate. Interestingly, empirical research on humility shows that this property is very worthwhile. Modesty is related to better academic performance, grades and leadership. Modest people have a better social relationship and avoid deception in their social interactions, they have a tendency to forgive, appreciate, and cooperative. A recent series of studies also shows that humility is a generous and consistent predictor. Some philosophers are not impressed by humility in history. Aristotle excluded it from his virtue catalog, and both David Hume and Friedrich Nietzsche criticized this trait. "Single, fast, repenting, humiliation, self-denial, humility, silence, loneliness, and the virtues of all monks. They have reasons to be rejected by conscious people everywhere, but they have a purpose Since wealth does not make him a member of a more valuable society, the entrepreneurial qualification of the company is not not qualified for the power to improve his own environment, but beyond all these ideal goals Understand that in your mind, cover your fancies and lose your mood, so we just move them to the opposite column and put them in the abuse directory "2 But empirical evidence seems to indicate that criticism of this humility is wrong. Since humility is a distinguishing feature of the successful organization of the CEO, we can promote the wealth of the world. The relationship between humility and generosity suggests that it makes people a more valuable member of society. Others believe humble individuals are well tuned and kind. Empirical evidence of modest value seems to suggest that Hume rejected it is a mistake. Modesty is a characteristic that is worth cultivating, given the appropriateness of our finite and error prone people, its personal prosperity and its value for social welfare. 1 Julie Exline and Peter Hill, "Humble: Coherent, powerful and generous prediction", Journal of Positive Psychology (May 2012): 208-218. This article contains references to other empirical studies related to the humility discussed above. "I began with modesty, acted humbly, acted humbly, humility acts for clarity, humility opens my mind and brings a generous mind. Everyone is my teacher, Humility grows up with wisdom, humility leads me, begins with humility, acts humbly and ends with humility.What are you planning to do for your life, And if you have a ten-year plan on how to get there, you should ask: why can not you do this in 6 months? Sometimes you follow a complex 10 year trajectory But at least one question is that this is the story or reality you said to yourself. Humility is often regarded as virtue. However, what we often see is not "humility" but "false humility". Here I argue that humility is one of the least pursued or even unpraised attributes. Instead, the task is to identify some other attributes to make others as discreet. As there are additional advantages, these other attributes are more sustainable and achievable, and there are many other advantages. I will present two such attributes when pursuing a conservative effect as a byproduct. Just as entrepreneurs do not pursue assets but create assets as a by-product of value creation Consider the spiritual value of the center, humility, and how it is expressed in real actions. Modesty has critics and contempt, but there is no doubt that true humility is a difficult spiritual achievement. If the English writer and philosopher

Given sociology, Durkheim is a very influential name. Durkheim's mission is to develop sociology, so you can define it and use it as a way to use sociology. Durchem is focusing mainly on his career when it is considered to be a past thing such as sharing religious views and ethnic backgrounds because in society the society has its integrity and rationality in modern society How to maintain. Regarding social realism of Durkheim, he is interested in growing individualism in society. An important, often misunderstood element of Durkheim's sociological approach can be found in the so-called Durkheim social realism. Alternatively, society is an objective and realistic entity which exists autonomously independently. This view is a concentrated picture of a specific individual. Social facts are seen as things through his prescription. In this realistic position, there are two important claims. First, Durkheim advocated ontological claims about the unique reality of social facts. Second, Durkheim argues that the epistemological and methodological claims that social facts should be viewed as reality objects that exist outside the minds of researchers and can be determined by the ability to do compulsive behavior I advocated. Therefore, Durkheim believes that there is a special existential nature in social facts, and when sociologists handle them in a proper and scientific way, they can discover and analyze them. In addition to the positivism of CONT, the second influence on Durkheim's view on society is an epistemological viewpoint called social realism. He never exposed it explicitly, but using a realistic view to prove the existence of social reality outside the individual, these facts exist in the form of social and objective relations showed that. As a scientific epistemology, realism can be defined as a viewpoint of placing external social reality in the external world, and these reality are independent of their individual perception and their central starting point I will use it as. This viewpoint is against other major philosophical views such as empiricism and positivism. Experians like David Hume believe that the reality of the outside world is a product of human perception. Context's positivism has advanced one step further, arguing that scientific law can be inferred from empirical observations.

The problem of evil was a problem that philosophers always tried to answer for centuries. That is simply why evil exists in our world if God exists and is complete and almighty. Two great philosophers, Gottfried Leibniz and Nicolas Malebranche, tried to answer this question with their own solution. They all answered the same questions, but their views were very different. Specifically, we oppose whether the world is the best world created by God. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, one of the most outstanding philosophers of the last century, wrote in his special novel "Little Prince" in 1943. 'As you finish washing and dressing every morning, you need to lean against your planet. "In other words, Little Prince has free natural freedom, but he still needs to be responsible for maintaining harmony with habitat, beyond personal responsibility. I believe that the government will take action to achieve equal opportunities and equality for all people. The government is responsible for alleviating social illnesses and protecting civic freedom, individuals and human rights. I think the role of the government should be to ensure that nobody needs it. Liberal policy emphasizes the need for the government to solve problems. Women have the right to decide what will happen to their bodies. Because the fetus is not a human life, it does not have another personal right. The government should abort the taxpayers for women who can not pay tax. Deciding on abortion is a personal choice for women who are fit for their body and the government must keep this right. Women have the right to receive affordable, safe and legal abortion, including several abortions. One of the important functions of the government is to define and distribute property rights. The courts and government agencies will help to define and protect these rights. The triad of property law, contract law and tort law provides a fundamental set of legal rules enabling protection from ownership, voluntary transfer, and involuntary transactions. The explanation of humanity of David Hume defines three basic rules of nature: "stability of possession, relocation of consent, and fulfillment of promises" (17).

Given sociology, Durkheim is a very influential name. Durkheim's mission is to develop sociology, so you can define it and use it as a way to use sociology. Durchem is focusing mainly on his career when it is considered to be a past thing such as sharing religious views and ethnic backgrounds because in society the society has its integrity and rationality in modern society How to maintain. Regarding social realism of Durkheim, he is interested in growing individualism in society. An important, often misunderstood element of Durkheim's sociological approach can be found in the so-called Durkheim social realism. Alternatively, society is an objective and realistic entity which exists autonomously independently. This view is a concentrated picture of a specific individual. Social facts are seen as things through his prescription. In this realistic position, there are two important claims. First, Durkheim advocated ontological claims about the unique reality of social facts. Second, Durkheim argues that the epistemological and methodological claims that social facts should be viewed as reality objects that exist outside the minds of researchers and can be determined by the ability to do compulsive behavior I advocated. Therefore, Durkheim believes that there is a special existential nature in social facts, and when sociologists handle them in a proper and scientific way, they can discover and analyze them. In addition to the positivism of CONT, the second influence on Durkheim's view on society is an epistemological viewpoint called social realism. He never exposed it explicitly, but using a realistic view to prove the existence of social reality outside the individual, these facts exist in the form of social and objective relations showed that. As a scientific epistemology, realism can be defined as a viewpoint of placing external social reality in the external world, and these reality are independent of their individual perception and their central starting point I will use it as. This viewpoint is against other major philosophical views such as empiricism and positivism. Experians like David Hume believe that the reality of the outside world is a product of human perception. Context's positivism has advanced one step further, arguing that scientific law can be inferred from empirical observations.

Adam Smith was born in Calcuti, Scotland on July 5, 1723. Steve entered the University of Glasgow at the age of 14, where he learned Francis Hutchinson 's moral philosophy. Here, Smith developed his strong passion for freedom, reason and freedom of speech. In 1740 he received the Snell Exhibition and entered the Ballet College of Oxford. In 1746 Smith left Oxford University. In 1748, Smith started a public lecture at Edinburgh under the auspices of the main case. In 1751 Smith was appointed Chairman of Glasgow Logic University and the following year he was appointed the position of Francis Hutchinson, president of ethics philosophy, his old teacher. Nicholas Phillips' new biography, "Adams Miss: Enlightened Life" (Ale; $ 32.50), which was very successful in putting together the two Smiths, shows how this feeling will become a financial god Let's see. . Historian Philipson of Edinburgh University pursued Rothschild and revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein and rarely made Smith Lord Byron, but he used events and plans to promote his life. One is his intimate friendship with philosopher David Hume, his nearest colleague, and his greatest influence, and his less direct embrace to Hume's notorious atheism. I realized that the real problem of Smith is not an issue of economists. How should a philosopher's question live? This is a modern question, Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order in a world without God? Adam Smith: writer, philosopher, and pioneer of the economy. But why did Adam Smith make him so important? Adam Smith was born on June 16, 1723 and is known for writing books called country wealth. Among his books, Smith discusses the generally accepted paradox of economic philosophy and also proposes a better, more correct ideology. Before Smith wrote his theory about the wealth of the people, individuals only considered national economics as the term "import and export". Many people believe that the situation of imported goods is very bad as currencies leave the country. Of course this means export is good as money has entered the country. This ideology has brought many countries to manufacture it to limit imports. Several strategies include taxing imports and protecting livestock industry.

Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Robert Malthus was born in February 1766 near Guildford, Surrey. His father succeeded at home and accepted Thomas' s education. Malthus then studied at the University of Cambridge and received a master's degree in 1791. In 1793 he became a researcher at Jesus University in Cambridge. In 1805, Malthus became a professor of history and political economics at the University of East India Company in Hailey Berry, Hertfordshire until his death. Malthus became a member of the Royal Society in 1819, two years later was appointed a member of the political and economic club, including David Ricardo and James Mill. In 1824, he was elected as one of the royal family members of the Royal Literature Society. Malthus also co-founded the London Statistics Association in 1834. Thomas Robert Malthus died on 23rd December 1834 Thomas Robert Malthus Thomas Robert Malthus is one of the most controversial figures in economic history. His reputation derives primarily from the demographic theory closely related to his name. Contrary to the view of the latter half of the eighteenth century that it is possible to raise people's living standards, Malthus believes that such improvements lead to population growth and therefore to reverse these benefits. Malthus also said that (rather than thinking that the economy can experience high unemployment rates over the long term) (rather than thinking that economics should be experience, not deductive science) than theoretical theory Thomas Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus, (1766 13 February, the UK Surigord near Roquery, died in 1834 December 29, St. Catherine, Bath, is best known in the summer his theory, the UK economy near the scholar and Seth is demographers, population growth tends to exceed the food supply, and without strict breeding restrictions, human improvement is not possible. this idea is often called the Malthusian. Malthus was born to a wealthy family. his father is skeptical David Hume of friends philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been under the influence of his book Émile (1762) is about to educate the son it might be a source of liberal thought. young Malthus, until he enrolled in Cambridge, Jesus College in 1784, was educated in most of the time home. So he is the many subjects And research, was awarded the Latin and Greek awards, I graduated in 1788.

"George Berkeley: Esse Est Percipi?" George Berkeley is a Catholic priest living in the 17th century (price, 206). He wrote some of the most profound works of the era, most of which was characterized by rationalism and British empiricism. Berkeley is a member of an empiricist. Generally, British empathists believe that knowledge comes from senses and 'sensory experiences' (Price, 193). Therefore, they believe that there is no natural knowledge, only knowledge is obtained, or they are posterior (Price, 193). John Rock was a British philosopher of the 17th century and contributed to the foundation of modern political discourse and empiricism. He will influence the revision of George Berkeley and David Hume and the theory of social contract, which will lay the foundation for liberal democracy and classical republicanism. Rock will be an influential figure in the formation of the initial US government and the drafting of the national constitution. His political theory will also affect the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant, John Rawls, Robert Nozick. Many people think the view of rock is similar to modern liberalism, but like most political philosophers it is difficult to classify him as a single ideology. Idealism is a philosophical system developed by Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1685-1783). To be an idealist means that he believes that something like a problem does not exist outside the mind. According to Berkeley, if I do not feel it with five senses, there will be no pencil that I wrote this article. In addition to human thought and our perception, Berkeley is trying to prove that things exist and exist. In the dialogue between Berkeley and Hilos and Filonos, they point out either gods that all ideas are recognized, or gods who perceive the human mind. In other words, according to Berkeley, God is the ultimate creator of our perception. Because of this belief, he ultimately refused such philosophy like Lucretius. Among them Lucretius tried to deny the existence of God. Therefore, while Berkeley can not understand the outside world through thought, he said "wise things".

Evil Issues The Jewish / Christian tradition is based on the belief that there is a supernatural individual, he is the ultimate creator, and all other existence can be attributed to their existence. The three main features lie in this (God?), Completely good (all power), completely strong (full power), and all known (omniscience). This is the basis of Western religious thought, and forming the subject of this article is the relationship between these features and evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

One of the most important and wonderful features of human value, and that Beckett is waiting for Godot civilization and Freud civilization, and that dissatisfaction in today's society is the progress that has taken place over time. Humans have never seen the technological progress that is happening now. These advances cover almost everything human beings know about life, from biomedical engineering to space exploration. I found that science is suitable for the expansion of life and mind. Ibsen's "enemy of the people" in science and human values, Beckett is waiting for Godot and Freud's civilization and its dissatisfaction. These people have both real history and imaginary historical records. Even Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, Bacon, and even Freud are laying the foundations in that field, the revolutionary idea still feels shock waves. - Comparing Plato Seminar and David Hume's study on human understanding philosophy, it means philosophy, love, signs and words when it is broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. The fact that Ibsen's "enemies of people" and Beckett are waiting for the values ​​and techniques of God's literature was a way for authors to always express the importance of human values ​​for human civilization. However, even before most ordinary people have literacy skills, some people learn stories from the Bible, historical stories and so on. This gives the public the opportunity to see stories and learn various lessons from the play. . - Existence judgment, resentment judgment and resentment The Webster dictionary defines existentialism as "People have absolute freedom of choice, the universe is ridiculous, emphasizes anxiety and alienation." In the 1940s the existentialism became a philosophical world, the group of existential philosophers became famous celebrities in the United States. The themes of existentialists were exhibited especially in the absurd drama "Waiting for Goddo" by Samuel Beckett. Transfer yourself. They insisted that Godot is an acquaintance, but in reality he knew little of him, and admitted that he would not admit him if I saw him. Samuel Beckett once asked who Godault is or what he is saying and answered, "I will say this in theater." Let's play games, exercise, exchange hats, think about suicide. The play uses "several prototype forms and situations, all of which apply to comedy and tragedy." This can only be reconciled in absurd thinking and art.

Epistemology is his study of our right to believe in myself. In a broader sense, we start with what we call cognition and ask if we have reason to take these positions. When discussing the cognitive standpoint, we must include both our beliefs and what we know. At a deeper level, we will examine our attitude towards strategies and methods used to acquire new beliefs and filter old beliefs. However, the epistemology relates to whether we acted responsibly in the formation of faith or acted irresponsibly. Alvin Goldman also outlines similar prior knowledge. His explanation is based on two assumptions. At first he is his explanation about the credibility of his understanding. This is followed by a general view that previous knowledge is based on knowledge of "pure thought" processes that function independently of experience and perception. If you can see that humans have reliable natural reasoning and computer systems, and if there is some evidence that we are doing this, these mechanisms are believed to give belief a priori and reasonable It is thoughtful. In particular, the beliefs gained from the behavior of these mechanisms without relying on perception are strong candidates of prior knowledge. Prior knowledge is a way to gain knowledge without the need for experience. In Bruce Russell's article 'A priori knowledge and knowledge' he states that this is "knowledge based on a priori reason 1". Transcendental knowledge contrasts with the posteriori knowledge acquired through experience. All crows are black. If you believe in option A, you believe that it is a priori reason, because you do not need to know that a crow is it a bird. If you believe in choice B, you have a reason to believe it, because you know that they are black, as you have seen many crows. He continued to say that it is not a question whether that statement is true if you believe that one is important. Immanuel Kant made a significant contribution to understanding previous knowledge. He showed that a priori knowledge can be comprehensive, that is, new knowledge can be obtained, which is not implicit in a priori propositions. Before Kant's work, it is generally accepted that all previous knowledge is analytical, ie any knowledge recognized from a priori propositions is included in the proposition and extracted through the analysis It was. David Hume was an early contemporary in the Kantian period and he showed that the reason can not logically deduce its effect (in Kant 's, believed, believed, in a rationalist school). Hume proposed then that there is no prior knowledge of causality. Kant disputed this proposal and argued that it is possible to synthesize a priori knowledge. Russell explains Kant's argument by presenting Kant's stock price example 7 + 5 = 12

Edgar Malroy will be regarded as the hero of the reader of Skepticism Inc. Edgar receives money from a wealthy church and hands it to the poor. This Robin Hood image makes Edgar various champions. And the reader will eventually protect him through the story. On the surface, the means to take Edgar's money is legal. However, bets never win, and better emotions will affect their ability to make decisions. If there is no clear result, a person can accept a bet by betting on conscience. Before we begin talking about it, this means that we first let you define the history of skepticism and skepticism. Skepticism is a position that philosophers can take and is a measure of doubt to avoid the ultimate truth. Skepticism and Pyronik skepticism are ideas conceived by Ellis Pillow in about 330 B.C. Michael Phillips Professor of Philosophy at Portland State University points out that there is a need to doubt the existence of tangible objects such as food in an article that "skepticism is ridiculous." Basically it is hypocritical to use doubts on something's reality. The biggest skeptics like history such as David Hume, Descartes and Bertrand Russell are puzzled by this funny puzzle. Some philosophers argue that it is possible to accept the tangible world, but they continue to cast doubt on the moral and theoretical parts of life. This question makes us face fundamental skepticism. I will also explain the possibility that it is not very radical but potentially hindered, and the skepticism that is not so skeptical yet. Is there any knowledge of the physical world? Is there scientific knowledge? Is there any knowledge about moral truth? Do not you know the future? It is like this. Let's look at one of them now. This is one of the most famous non-radical skeptics in the world of philosophy - I doubt the knowledge of the outside world. (This is skeptical, in order to deny what most people are accepting, skeptical denial in this sense is amazing.)

Enlightenment has brought new ideas and messages to society dominated by dominant power: the church. In these dark times, the ultimate authority over people dominated their powerful 'hint' power beyond their religious doctrine and their national leaders. For centuries, as the world's largest and wealthiest organization, the church has the power to oppress free thinkers. In front of the mass communication, most educated literate people were Christian monks who managed information mainly about religious texts and handed the selected information to ignorant masses. Religious tolerance: I am skeptical about religious facilities, but I think many enlightenment thinkers should freely worship according to their own wishes. "The intellectuals of enlightenment was energetically requesting to restrict the political power of organized religion to contain the intolerance of religious war," Abnerz said. Freedom: tolerance to the religion of the Illuminati is related to individual freedom to emphasis. This concept considers that God and nature give fundamental rights to all human beings and that humans should be able to act freely without being limited by oppression. "These philosophers highlight that the government does not have authority over individual conscience," Abernethy explained. "Individuals have rights, everyone is equal, and legitimate political power is based on people's consent, and it is mandatory to express the will of people." Enlightenment thinkers oppose superstition. An enlighten thinker cooperated with the enlightened tyrant, the enlightened ruler of the absolute, who tried to force some new ideas about the government to be carried out. Enlightenment has great influence on European culture, politics and government. Beginning in the 17th century, it was a philosopher Francis Bacon (1562-1626), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), John Rock (1632-1704), Pierre Vail (1647-1706), Voltaire (1694-1778) It was started by. , Francis Hutchin, (1694-1746), David Hume (1711-1776) and physicist Isaac Newton (1643-1727). The prince often supports and develops these figures, and even attempts to apply their government concepts to so-called enlightened absoluteism. The scientific revolution is closely related to enlightenment, as its discovery reverses many traditional notions and introduces a new view on the state of nature and humanity.

As composers and performers, there is no doubt the definition of Mozart's genius and genius. The main definition is that genius is very big, rare natural ability and skill. This is a kind of creativity. Therefore, it is obvious that Mozart is indeed a genius of his music; · Since Amadeus Mozart turned out to be foolish, however, in what state, anywhere, also obvious God Need to have the character and behavior of a genius, a dirty, childish, "baby" person. Being a genius on one aspect of the mind like music may mean that the rest of the mind is suppressed like social skills. In the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, a genius is the ability to independently understand and understand the concepts others have to teach. For Kant, originality is an essential feature of genius. This genius is a creative talent and can be described as non imitation. Kant 's debate on genius' main function involved "Criticism of the trial", welcomed the early 19 th century romanticism. Also, theoretical and genius Schopenhauer's theory about personnel, especially from direct constraints from cant, determine the first paragraph of section criticism. In the philosophy of David Hume, the way society perceives genius resembles the way society recognizes ignorance. Hume said that people with genius characteristics are regarded as people who are not touched by people working at remote locations from society and other parts of the world. On the other hand, it alone is not a natural genius in the scientific era of the country where ignorant people are further insults, prosperity and what is not considered a reliable sign, but in the complete lack of all these noble noble entertainment Jinjin I will not go. The most perfect role must be somewhere between these two extremes; exquisite courtesy letters generated in conversation with retention insight; books, corporate and commercial equivalent ability and taste Maintaining, to business, is the obvious consequence of justice philosophy Accuracy and accuracy If you believe that performance is a genius, we will always recognize them as endings. As a sign of genius, the level works as a forehead with a rubber stamp and tells people what they can do. This grading is a symptom of conveyor belt education, quality control inspector regards the product as inappropriate product. Ignatius J Reilly identified a persecuted genius position. The same can be said to the agitator who is still fighting and the privilege classes and media forces behind it. For all savage foolish all are allies with them. Although concern about the needs of all parties dismissed in this process, it is felt that Keelly, Shanise and Doug can not mobilize their common base. In black life, so-called white garbage becomes commitment toxic exhaust gas of the United States, it is instructed to follow the United States again, it will remain in dangerous condition

In the absence of God, the claim of evil was a controversial issue in the discussion of religious philosophy. This question is trying to explain how some evil in the world allows the evil of the world to happen when traditional gods have the ability to block these events, knowledge, and ability. But in order to delve into this particular discussion, we must first decide what qualities the traditional God should have. The god of "traditional" monotheism as found in Judaism - Christian religion should be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnidirectional. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Some believe that Clifford 's opinion is contradictory, but it attracts devaluation of possible outcomes of non - political beliefs and argues that the result is not related to this belief. My argument is that Clifford's view is the same and it is only necessary to clarify the impact on the role of "belief ethics" (and in this respect William James's "will believe"). As Clifford argues, the outcome of certain events not formed by a specific belief has nothing to do with the state of knowledge and moral belief. A moral problem is the use of non-political beliefs to form a policy that constitutes a commitment to the principle of opposition. (I) our earlier moral obligation to minimize the risk of harming ourselves and other people (ii) blatant ignorance (i) adoption of risk policy, ie non-political . Clifford's claim should be interpreted as proof that the non-political belief management approach actually constitutes a risk contradictory to the moral obligations of this predecessor. They have nothing to do with this risk. The moral status of their beliefs. They have nothing to do with non-political moral status, but they have nothing to do with the facts of risk. Non-political moral imperfection is in a contradiction with our previous moral obligation, not the value or depreciation expenses of a particular outcome of the belief management style. Naturally, the classical trajectory of belief debate ethics is an article naming it. "Ethics of Faith" was published in 1877 by a mathematician of Cambridge and a philosopher William Goldden Clifford in a journal called "Contemporary Review". At the beginning of the paper, Clifford defended the strict principle that we are always obliged to provide sufficient evidence for each belief. Indeed, since the early part of "belief ethics" was very strict, William James later described Clifford as "delicious greed" and defended "self-discipline." Tragedy "(1896, 8) In 1877, William King Don Clifford suggested that belief in certain things would be unreasonable without sufficient evidence in his book "Ethics and Beliefs". . He often acknowledges that there is a gap of understanding between evidence and conclusion in the belief of many people (inductive reasoning), but he also said, "Whenever there is no evidence anywhere, nobody knows things In addition, he insists that trusting (tendency to believe) and tolerating superstition eventually harm society. He agreed with David Hume (1711-76) and "All wise men are commensurate with their beliefs and evidence." This position - a belief without sufficient evidence - is irrational - is called evidenceism and many atheists (including Clifford and Hume) are adopted in their theology. In "Ethics of Faith", William Clifford believes that no one can believe without evidence anytime, anywhere. Clifford gives immorality without evidence. An example of faith is the owner of a ship who believes that his ship is on the sea, abandoning the overhaul of the ship, overcoming his doubt, spending the examination and making the necessary repairs. This example is a belief in self-interest. For his own interests, the owner of the ship overcame his doubts. Then he gathered his insurance and everyone on his boat died in the ocean as he proved that the ship was not ship resistant.

Tassius is a Roman senator and writer and lives between 56 and 117 years old. He was born in a modern town of Gaul, now France. He has a wealthy father, and his family keeps horses. In the process of growth, Tasius likes outdoor activities and likes hunting as entertainment. When he attended school he studied rhetoric. Tasius friend Pliny Youngor also studied rhetoric. This will help Tassius engage in legal and political careers. Tashius became an ancient man, later became a Roman official, later became a senator. First, I will look at Tasius's "history". Tassius is an example of a writer and knows most of the important information in his life, but few missing parts. Tacitus is not born, even his birthday is not. "By calculating the age at which he may be in several offices would give 55 AD or Tacitus' birth date." Also I am not sure what his name is. The manuscript called it Gaio Cornelius Tacitus. Tashitus was born in northern Italy and said that he took office under Vespian, but when he was 77 he married daughter of General Rome Agricola and became a consular in 1988. His work shows clear prejudic bias, and his education in his writing suggests that he is likely to come from a wealthy and powerful family. Classic pieces of essay.com/authors are unknown; they lack data in their lives. Are these details considered reliable? Review of the author's classic works is not known; there is a lack of data in their lives. Are these details considered reliable? This year may be the 1000th anniversary of the death of Publius Cornelius Tacitus. The year of his death was a bit confusing - a historian insisted on publicity in 118, but others raised 120 AD - but his meaning should almost be contradictory. Tacitus's Annals and Histories were greatly affected from Machiavelli and Montaigne to Edward Gibbon and David Hume. In the 20th century, the Nazis caught the explanation of the German ancient Germanic german, Robert Graves was his famous Claudius. Claudius) explores historical stories.

Why did design theory fail? Due to its shortcomings the design theory failed due to the lack of de facto and substantial evidence to prove the argument. It presents many ideas and ideas, but they are not reasonable; the only real fact is that you have to trust them. I think that it is correct to criticize the evidence that it did not oppose the existence theory of God. The main philosopher who criticized and opposed the Teleogical Argument was David Hume. These arguments, advocated by Philo, support the reasons why design arguments have failed. Through his role, Cleanthes, David Hughes introduced a debate that the nature and existence of God can be proved by inference based on observations of the universe. Cleanthes is trying to prove this with his "design theory". And by witnessing the natural beauty and order, complexity and complexity of the universe, we can safely deduce that our best designers have created One of the traditional themes of natural theology is the existence of God, one of which is discussion from design and theoretical arguments. Discussion is that the existence of God can be proved by an obvious design in the complexity of the world. EncyclopædiaBritannica says, "This is most popular for the most accessible theoretical reason ... it deduces sacred designers and determines the evidence of design in nature.The coherent facts as a whole In this view, the same functional system also shows the wisdom of God behind it. " Design controversy is an empirical argument against the existence of God. These arguments are made by inferring the existence of God as the best interpretation of these features, trying to identify the various empirical features of the world which usually (but not always) constitute the evidence of intelligent design. Because the concept of design and purpose is closely related, design argument is also called a theoretical argument and includes "terror", "target", or "purpose" in Greek. Discussion of design is at the center of the concept of intelligent design movement. There are many different types of design parameters that differ not only from the evidence used but also from their logical parameter structure. Design arguments are divided into analogy, induction and inductive (inferred best interpretation) are typical. All these arguments are trying to explain intuitive logic so that everyone can form their commonsense beliefs in design and apply this logic to the natural order.

Enlightenment awareness raising in the 18th century and politician enlightenment was an exciting historical era. For the first time since ancient Greece, reason and logic are the center of the most elaborate social thinking. The discovery and understanding of the replaced religion as an impulsive ideal of this age, and the high social scene in Europe, intense debate about these new ideas still exist. French playwright named after pseudonvoltel is the most famous and controversial enlightenment writer. Progress of Enlightenment With the arrival of 1900, many changes are taking place. New leaders, government styles, and new ideas have just begun. The focus of Age of Enlightenment was based on reason, rationalism, and the concept of "unavoidable progress". Enlightenment was driven by Kant, Bulgaria, Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton, François Marie Aduwe Voltaire, Thomas Hobbes, and other wonderful people. - The main reason for enlightenment is the scientific revolution and it is believed that social and political sectors may achieve a similar breakthrough if the same method is used for its many accomplishments in science I will. For example, philosophers like David Hume are trying to preserve the moral "autonomy" related to religion. In this view, God and the future country are unnecessary for moral life and human society. John Locke and Thomas Jefferson Have you heard about Age of Enlightenment in history? This is important when people begin thinking new things in technology, science, politics, and philosophy. Enlightenment has also brought many unforgettable thinkers that continue to influence us today. Among these thinkers are very clever John Rock and Thomas Jefferson. Self-defense is part of the law of nature; it can not deny to the community and even to the king himself.

Decline of authority When Alice looked for glasses across wonderlands, she encountered various personality and her absurd claims cast doubt on her implicit assumption. The strange logic these characters brought to Alice forced her to acknowledge and reevaluate the objective truth she had previously accepted. As Carol's absurdness is exaggerated with an observable phenomenon in society but has identifiable similarity, this discrepancy makes sense, meaningless to Alice (and reader) that Carol's Have the experience of the essence of the satire. Epiphany Before the autumn of 2003 to 2004, the universe (such as a great architect) sent us to Grand Rapids, Montana, USA - they actually put the hydropower dams in several Missouri states. The waterfall is on the river near the Great Falls, Montana State. The geological and practical nature of these geological features, and the amazing integration of this geographical feature, were initially considered valuable named after the town of Great Falls. Each waterfall in Missouri Province in Cascade County has a hydroelectric dam. I think there is a total of 5 dams per 15 miles in Missouri. Historians have been fascinated by the decline of great civilizations like ancient Greece and Rome. However, for human beings, corruption does not include lessons less important than the collapse of the United States, ending the era of virtue and leading the entire planet into the second dark era. The philosophical power that ultimately destroyed the United States was released even before the birth of the country. His philosophical skepticism of 1748 "David Hume" will not rise tomorrow, the proposition is equally understandable, which means that it does not contradict it any more. In 1781, he wrote, "Purely rational criticism of Emmanuel Kant finds it necessary to deny knowledge to make room for faith," he wrote. Publications five years after the establishment of the United States of America

In the 19th century, we found independent or unrestricted themes in the development of two different borders. Manifesto Destiny, freedom of caste, and through opportunities for farmers to acquire almost free land, it was found in the western United States. Discover mathematical independence by building a stronger theoretical basis, non-Euclidean geometry and Cantor infinity. Independence involves breaking the traditional view that is generally accepted to explore new ideas. My historical discussion of the term 's identity follows the two important developments in identity - from general mathematics in the history of philosophy - metaphysical. Main genealogies follow evolution theory, psychology, and ultimately the development of identity as a national term. This evolution follows the main path of British empiricism of the 17th century, Scottish Enlightenment of the 18th century, and Utilitarianism of the 19th century. John Locke and David Hume develop their meanings into personal identities. This meaning was completed in the context of James Mill's Scottish Enlightenment. John Stuart Mill introduced it as a concept of collective psychology. I think he is the first person to use it as a citizen's identity in the sense of a modern center. From the day the United States won independence, the minded Americans tried to determine a new national identity invited by Paris peace. Especially exquisite scholars from the beginning of the 21st century dates back to this identity. Their ingenuity will enrich the American understanding of their new national character. But after all, their efforts are destined to fail. It asked how the attachment of the people would replace the narrow-minded people, in fact they are not. It assumes that the identity of the United States is actually concentrated when it is divided, which tells the political superiority among people focusing on social and economic problems. From the beginning, identity was the main focus of African and African American writers. Indeed, the identity of African Americans experienced dramatic changes between the 18th and 20th centuries. As Amistad's "Federal Party No. 54" presented by the new black and black soul shows, the identity of African Americans has changed from an early tribal identity to a slavery based inhumane identity It was. Finally, the new "Black Identity" is based on art and Africa. These changes