Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? In this regard, Descartes presents several arguments, including simple human interests, concerns about free will, understanding of human motives, and moral value issues. Both theories are trying to explain human behavior - conflict and consensual theory. Consensus theory argues that social norms can be achieved by sharing norms, beliefs, values, but conflict theory argues that inequality creates class conflicts. Then perceive the world by opposing the opinions that influence how these theories achieve their ultimate goal. The patterns of consensus and conflict differ in many ways, including their social outlook and its value, assumptions about the ultimate goal and means. Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? - The consensus theory on the content of criminal law, the way society finds itself, is the product of social needs and values, which is also for the benefit of society. The rule is that the community controls itself for ordering. When a crime is committed, it will be punished when society deems it appropriate. The importance of this crime must be evaluated by the same society and punishment itself. The theory of consensus and conflict differs in their perception, values, means, and goals for society. Consensus theory argues that the world is a society with common norms and beliefs, while conflict theory sees social division due to inequality. Therefore, they have different precedence values ​​and targets. The consensus theory only hopes for harmony and the opposition theory hopes to achieve social change by eliminating inequality. Violent means can also occur in conflict and consensual theory, which is why they are likely to cause war. Even in the process of pursuing consensus, violence may be inevitable, which is why aggression is common in modern society. Consequently, the theory of conflict and consensus shows how the difference in worldview influences the philosophy of a good society and how to achieve it.

Critical ethnology: Investigation of minority participation in Canadian criminal justice system Canada's population can be described as a multicultural and diverse personal system. There is no doubt that certain minorities have lifestyles and behavior patterns that conflict or conflict with the police (Fleras & Elliot, 1996). In light of this conflict, Canadian police have increased the number of blacks killed compared to white. Criticize racism theory. Critical ethnology studies racial justice and "ethnic recognition" in the social environment (Babbie, 2007). During the civil rights movement, this concern about race became serious in the mid 1970's. Civil rights activists use this view to change domestic and state laws that give ethnic power to ethnic minorities. Exchange theory exchanging theory was founded by social scientist George Homans to test human behavior through the cost and benefits of decision-making. It approaches social relations from a basic psychological starting point, based on how individuals feel things, how to infer, and how to draw conclusions "(Babbie, 1995) Critical ethnic theory was born when recognizing the use of American racism ideology in 1970. This is a concept of social construction that attempts to show the legal structure including anti-discrimination law that responds to and promotes racial discrimination (Aylward, 1999). Implications of critical ethnic theory will strengthen the use of power in the criminal justice system. Initially, the purpose and purpose of critical ethnic theory highlighted race and power. It fundamentally breaks society by classifying racial ranks. However, the recognition of racial discrimination reproduces inequality and further reduces the rights of ethnic minorities. This concept dismantles the status of ethnic minorities while reconstructing the prejudice of the jury (Aylward, 1999). In the context of Canada, critical racism theory is often applied to racial discrimination, black and more prominent race of indigenous people.

Our society always has problems with punishment and responsibility. As a society, we tend to pay attention to criminal penalties. Violence seems to be an indivisible part of our society We watch it on TV, read it in newspapers and books, and are currently playing violent video games. When it comes to the justice system, most citizens are concerned about how individuals are punished, even punished too severely, not sufficiently serious, even needing punishment to require psychiatric treatment I do not even know whether there is any. Today, we have many theories about how to deal with convicted criminals. In essence, most (not all) can be integrated into two camps, utilitarianism and retaliation. Utilitarianism is concerned with the greater interests of society and any punishment should benefit society as a whole. Furthermore, the penalties used should bring greater benefits to society than crime. Utilitarianism is looking for the future as it seeks the most beneficial practices for society as a whole to reduce crime and people's happiness. The other side of the Utilitarian approach is a punitive punishment. Unlike Utilitarianism, retaliation theory goes against. Because it can only find penalties that match crime in crime and its surroundings. Criminals should only get their own desert. In other words, there is some moral responsibility in the act itself, punishment must be commensurate with moral defects. Punishment of crime is a central issue of the criminal justice system. It is usually justified on the basis of retaliatory or practical philosophy. Punishment is the right of the perpetrator, which is a means to restore the full contractual relationship with his compatriot, according to retributors of Newcomb, and it is in line with the logic and idea of ​​social contract. Therefore, punishment is regarded as an inevitable consequence of crime, it is also the defense and compensation of law-abiding citizens. In this case, punishment is a thing of the past, criminals against criminals should graduate to adapt to the harm caused by the current crime (von Hirsch 1976, 1993; Ashworth & Wasik 1998). Revenge is criticized for defending revenge

Introduction: Many experts focus on experts' views on data and research. Excellent experts will discover and test their research. The traditional old concept of police work leads to testing many adventures and something. George Kelling and James Q. Wilson analyzed and verified their hypothesis. I will break their "broken Windows theory" and how to change today's law enforcement agencies. Theme I. Broken Windows sets law enforcement criteria. A. Early start of broken Windows theory. B. Concrete discussion to break Windows theory. In 1982, James Q. Wilson and George Kelling proposed a law enforcement theory called Broken Windows. They use broken window terms as metaphor of obstacles within the community. Their theory links the confusion within the community, civilization and subsequent serious crimes. The theory has skepticism, most of which are scholars who have never seen a community with "broken windows". Recently diced brewed in New York City. The New York City Council plans to vote for the legalization of minor crimes such as urination of the public, possession of marijuana, possession of garbage, garbage dumping, public drinking, excessive noise, and park rules. Currently, these illegal acts are subject to the subpoena of the criminal court. The offender returned to the county criminal court about 45 days after the violation. If they do not show it, they issue arrest warrants. Many warrants have been issued. why? As you may know, the "broken window" is a community law enforcement theory that has attracted a lot of attention after Ferguson, Baltimore, Freddy Gray and Eric Ghana. You may hear it explained as a law enforcement theory fighting a small crime to prevent larger crimes. On 4th May, NPR summarized in this way. It sounds badly, aggressive and authoritarian. This theoretical view is supported by the death of Eric Garner 's television broadcast - as the world knows, he died when he was roughly involved in cigarettes.

Through his analysis, "he developed a theory of deviation from body composition that shows whether a person is a" born criminal ". (Lombroso, 2000). Compared with the criminal law, Solid has no face, head, ears like big monkey, big lips, twisted nose, and excessive asymmetrical physical features. Tibia, long arm and excessive skin wrinkles. Criminal behavior was always the focus of psychologists, due to ancient arguments between nature and cultivation. Is the responsibility of the individual genetic make them criminals, or is the environment they grew up determining their results? The study of this discussion led to the conclusion that genes and the environment play a role in individual criminal acts. This evidence comes from many twins, families and adoption studies, and laboratory experiments. In addition, this study suggests that predicting criminal behavior is more common for interactions between genes and the environment. Although the genetic predisposition of criminal behavior does not determine individual behavior, if it is exposed to the appropriate environment, there is a high possibility of participation in crime or antisocial behavior. Is criminal activity a product of human nature or cultivated? This is a sustained problem for many criminologists, and this argument has plagued many theorists and researchers. There are various remarkable theories in criminal science, but there is almost no exception in this dichotomy of this rigorous "nurturing" theory. Because there is increasing evidence linking social and biological risk factors to criminal behavior, it is difficult to completely ignore the impact of biology or sociology in any theory. Its nature and cultivation: integration of biology and genetics into social learning theory of criminal behavior

Crime theory and criminal activity Each criminal theory has a super-theoretical level of at least two to three. The basic problem is usually solved at the method level, often referred to as a theoretical assumption or starting point, but the term "hypothesis" is a strict reference to the general background and domain boundaries that can be derived . Behind the method level is the perspective level, which is the largest consensus unit in the scientific community, in fact it is the name of the science field. Age - Crime curves, feminists and empirical questions raised by criminal history / development studies challenge the idea that a single causal mechanism or general criminal theory can account for participation in criminal activity (eg, Cohen, & Farrington, 1994; Daly, 1994; 1995; Homert, 1993; Patterson & Yoerger, 1993), see Blumstein, Cohen, Roth, & Visher, 1986; Blumstein). In particular, feminist scholars question whether male male theory and male-based theory can explain women's experiences (ie, universal problem, Daly & Chesney-Lind, 1988). But even scholars who claim that the etiology of crime is gender argue that there are multiple ways to commit a crime. The development method and the criminal career method indicate the existence of different kinds of offenders (Nagin, Farrington, & Moffitt, 1995) in which the crime path and subsequent crime patterns follow different paths and trajectories. Crime theory and criminal activity Each criminal theory has a super-theoretical level of at least two to three. The basic problem is usually resolved at the method level, which is often called a theoretical assumption or starting point. The main focus of criminal study - crime and criminal study - is the cause of people's crime. The social and psychological theory of crime is the two most common views on how criminal behavior evolves. According to literature review of journals of human behavior in the social environment, criminal psychology played an important role in shaping ways society thinks about crime and crime and developing policies related to these issues. Illegal acts are caused by an imbalance of identity, self and superego. The conflict between the three personality elements forces the individual to develop a defense mechanism to cope with the conflict. As a result, it may lead to problematic behavior or illegal behavior. Erik Erikson extended Freud's theory and interpreted illegal acts as an "identity crisis" caused by internal confusion.

The film "Falling Down" released in 1993 depicts unemployed defense workers who are dissatisfied with society and dissatisfied with the Los Angeles community. The movie following William was the destruction and influence of his actions against other characters in the movie. Clearly, the events and personality in the film are ideal examples of criminal theory and social control. Anomie is characterized by eternal emotions. This is because social norms have collapsed without these norms in order to guide individuals and they can neither find a place in society nor adapt to the constant change of life. One of the most common control structures is one of the most widely tested criminal logic theories in the literature, following a reckless strategy. Hirschi (1969) continues to integrate various theories: anomie, social collapse, differential association, labeling and containment, and elements of social ties. Kizuna is made up of four elements of attachment, dedication, participation, and faith. Hirschi believes that the stronger the relationship, the more opportunities for social contribution activities will be. Conversely, the weaker the bond, the more likely the crime will occur. Traditional behavior is penetrating through close relationships with schools, workplaces, families, communities, and friends. Alienation and discordance with these factors, that is, weak bonds are likely to lead to crime In this article we discuss five general criminal logic theories applied to the principle of white-collar crime. Edwin Sutherland's theory, anomie and corporate prejudice, control theory, rational choice theory, and inclusive theory. Each suggests various causes of white-collar criminal behavior, such as society, personality, culture. Motivation for violating rules and committing such crimes is also presented from various viewpoints. The original idea was to raise crimes and conspiracy committed by members of wealthy classes that affected business and industry for personal benefit without taking responsibility for the law. Sutherland often observed that such a case was done under the civil court because such a case is itself a loss of property rather than an act. People who commit crimes only concern about lost property, not a formal lawsuit that punishes those who commit crimes. In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural defects. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members

Social contracts are trying to explain why individuals agree to form an organized government. People are willing to abandon previously enjoyed freedom in a natural state in which the government does not intervene in their pursuit and are believed to respond to individual attempts to protect the behavior that is most appropriate for their interests. In this case, moral and political obligations rely on contracts or agreements among people to form the society where they live. As philosophers advocating social contract theory think that individuals exist before the government, the government concretely meets and satisfies social contract theory. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

Before we explain some of the differences between civil and criminal functions and objectives, we must understand the essence of the law. "The law is an asset of the regulations, which is recognized between controversial problem corporations and son-in-law (Roger Thomas, 2003-2004, p. 7) As Roger Thomas said, everyone You should have a set of rules that prohibits him from doing the wrong things, so there are councils and other different agencies that enacted environmental rules. Unlike the Civil Code, the Penal Code is a legal system that includes criminal penalties. Therefore, in a civil action, two people object to rights, criminal prosecution involves the government deciding whether to punish individuals by action or omission. Each state decided to prescribe criminal acts. Therefore, each province has its own criminal law. Parliament also punished certain acts and elected to codify the federal penal code of section 18 of United States Code. The provincial and federal penal code varies. Some regulations are similar to the common law criminal law, but other regulations such as the "New York Criminal Law" strictly imitate "criminal law" (MPC). A distinguishing characteristic of criminal offense is punishment. Classifying the law as Penal Code or Civil Code affects the protection provided by the accused, for example by prohibiting double hazards. Punishment is aimed at achieving various goals including retaliation, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacity and recovery. The judges tried to achieve the purpose of punishment through punishment including imprisonment, fine, probationary observation, intermediate sanctions, and death penalty. Asset invalidation can be done in another program The government generally does not recognize the legitimacy of civil disobedience and does not regard the political objective as an excuse for violating the law. Specifically, the law usually distinguishes between criminal motives and criminal intentions, criminal motives or purposes may be respectable and admired, but his intentions may still be a crime . Therefore, "If there is a possibility of civil disobedience, it must come from outside the legal system." One theory is that disobedience may be helpful, but large disobedience is to compromise the law by encouraging broad disobedience that is not liable or socially beneficial. Therefore, it is necessary to punish the criminal's considerable efforts. Michael Bayless believes that if a person violates the law to establish a test case on the constitutionality of the law and then wins his case, that action does not constitute civil disobedience.

Technology has played an important role in our lives. The use of the Internet not only brings much benefit to our society but also increases the chances of illegal activities including illegal downloading of music and movies. The use of photography, literature, software without paying photography fee is also very common illegal acts. Changes in social morality also affect when behavior is called "illegality". Before 1967 abortion was illegal, it was wrong and not considered a choice. Science / Social Biology / Game Theory / Evolutionary Definition: Natural law is the ESS used to exercise force, or something like the following. Alternatively, in the absence of an orderly society using personal, unorganized violence to punish such acts, such violence is a violence against people using such violence (violence under natural law Behavior) is not dangerous for reasonable people. . This definition is equivalent to the definition of game theory of non-zero sum games of three or more players from iteration, applied to evolution theory. The concepts and actions of law are legal or illegal, and it has the emotional meaning that it really has, because it is part of our essence that uses power. The law manages the behavior of our society. Morality affects personal decisions related to personal behavior. Therefore, at the basic level, it is difficult to accurately identify the conceptual distinction between law and ethics. It is a fact that the law can be divided into two parts. The law consists of a series of basic concepts (conceptual system) and general legal principles (its substantive system). The distinction between these two components is not easy to explain, but the basic concept system aims to refine the basic framework and superstructure of the legal paradigm. The law is a code of conduct that guides everyone, a rule that can be enforced by legitimate agencies. As our world and society become more complicated, more laws have been enacted and implemented. The law is basically a basic rule of behavior, it is a command that people write and is designed to help live together happier and safer more. Whether written or not, they are the foundation of all societies. Because there is no society without some form of consensus and people's cooperation.

Social contracts are trying to explain why individuals agree to form an organized government. People are willing to abandon previously enjoyed freedom in a natural state in which the government does not intervene in their pursuit and are believed to respond to individual attempts to protect the behavior that is most appropriate for their interests. In this case, moral and political obligations rely on contracts or agreements among people to form the society where they live. As philosophers advocating social contract theory think that individuals exist before the government, the government concretely meets and satisfies social contract theory. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

In 1942, two criminal scholars from the "Criminal Studies Chicago School" Clifford Show and Henry D. McKay developed their social collapse theory through their research. The theory of social collapse points out that the physical and social environment of a person is primarily responsible for the choice of behavior made by a single person. The core of the theory of social collapse is that this position is important when predicting illegal behavior. Shaw and McKay pointed out that communities with the highest crime rate have at least three common problems: physical disintegration, poverty, and a higher level of ethnic and cultural mix. Shaw and McKay claim that crime does not occur at the individual level, but rather argue that ordinary people correspond to abnormal situations. Social collapse theory is widely used as an important predictor of youth violence and crime Shaw and McKay have found four concrete hypotheses as explanation of crime. The first hypothesis is the collapse of community-based management measures, and people living in these vulnerable communities naturally respond to environmental conditions. The third is a company that is closely related to a weak community that is affected by the "ecological approach" of competition and control. The fourth and final assumption is that the weak urban community brings about the development of criminal value that will replace normal social value. In the theory of social collapse, when predicting criminal behavior, it is considered that the individual's place of residence is more important than the characteristics of the individual. Therefore, according to the theory of social collapse, the place is very important when it becomes a crime. Since the theory was first introduced in 1942, the theory of social collapse has been widely noticed in the field of criminal science. Many studies in major US cities have repeated the results of the first studies of Shaw and McKay. Research on social collapse theory helps governments and law enforcement decision makers make informed decisions from evidence and helps vulnerable groups to prevent making criminal acts safe for everyone Strategies can be developed. Criminal studies and other social sciences have considered countless aspects when trying to explain the factors that individuals deviated from the social norm of social collapse. Sociologists established social structural theory ("social collapse theory") in the process of linking behavior patterns to socioeconomic management and other socioecological factors. It is pointed out that the theory of social collapse is extended from the theory of social structure, and the community in which social structure is declining is highly likely to have a high crime rate ("social cost"). In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural flaws. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members

In this article, inequality between mothers and fathers in the criminal justice system, analyzing the proportion of mothers and women in prison, the proportion of mothers and females in prison, comparing them with fathers, and enforcing crime I will critically consider whether there is. Comparing the presence of inequality, the relationship with crime shows a clear understanding. In this article I will explain how criminal theory relates to criminal behavior in society and use the theory that each gender commits the same crime. Treatment The terms crime and social false serve to understand economic bias in the criminal justice system, ideological processes, social inequality, and scale for wealthy people (White, Haines, & Eisler, 2008, p. 111). The dominant elite has passed the law, focusing on selected people who are thought to cause catastrophic crimes. Law enforcement agencies are responsible for supporting the law without doubting prejudice and assigning sufficient resources to investigate white-collar crime. In this article, I will study the procedures in the criminal justice system. Before laying the foundation for this work, I will briefly introduce the contents of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system is a collection of laws and social institutions that enforce the criminal law, while observing a series of clear procedural rules and restrictions. And Dignan, J. (2007) The procedure in the criminal system has already been stated as "starting only when crime is reported to the police" (page 2). When a crime occurs, the main content of the relevant criminal justice system is the law enforcement agency, otherwise it is the police. The police 's top priority is to investigate the crime and make an appropriate arrest. The power of the police is dominated by the states in which they are engaged and engaged. In the United States, criminal management and judicial administration are handled by the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. The prospect of this criminal trial tends to focus on how the incident flows in the system, causing a chain reaction when an incident is transferred from one component to another component. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the court, and the decision of the judge of the court affected the operation of the prison and the prison.

Criminal justice in every aspect of criminal justice policy has many different aspects. Especially different theory with crime, they influence the criminal justice system. The classic school of crime is a more human way than punishing people who are evolutionary, from the perspective of the type of capital punishment. Positivism criminology maintains control over human behavior and criminal behavior. They are used to achieve this goal by three different kinds of biological research, five types of criminal law, these three biological studies focus on theoretical biology, psychological Theory contains four different theories and contains four different theories of sociological theory theory. Criminal justice is often divided into practical and formal (or program) dimensions. Aspects involving substantive criminal justice legislation norms; desert requirements; socio-economic and political opportunities in the desert distribution, prescription of fair and equitable regulations, as well as burdens of criminal motives, inequality decision and It deserves punishment. In this sense, the requirements of criminal justice are not persons engaged in acts like discrimination classes, religion, race, origins, etc., and must be subject to similar punishment or remuneration Regardless, it will result in a similar result of action. You can not impose criminal laws and procedures for any class, socio-economic class, religion, groups of ethnicity or gender, or rely on other social and political differences. Evaluation of criminal justice system Criminal justice (WJP rule of law index factor 8). An effective criminal justice system is an important aspect of the rule of law, as it constitutes a traditional mechanism for relief of social behavior committed by individuals against dissatisfaction and behavior. Effective timely and successful criminal justice system Criminal justice system (8.1 and 8.2) (8.4) Determine equitable investigations and criminal offenses institutional and non-discriminatory, and decide what corruption and unfair government influence ( 8.5 and 8.6), while securing its victims, and effective protection of the rights of the accused (8.7). (8.3) effective criminal justice provision is also effective and necessary to lower the criminal detective system

In this article, we introduce the social theory of Marxism, interaction, functionalism. I will study their strengths and weaknesses. Marx's macro law to analyze society from the viewpoint of class conflict between proletariat and bourgeoisie, Durchem's macro method used for large scale analysis of social system and population, and who's theory is personal or more problematic Reflecting the broad social model and the microscopic approach of George Mead, they focus on the small social interactions that interpret the theory as individual acts are important, and the way in which the world society is explained Marxism is the theory of social structure. In other words, Marxists think that society and its formation are the main cause of crime, just like functionalist. Unlike functionalists, they believe that crime and deviation are inevitable in various societies Marxists believe that crime is inevitable in capitalist society, and capitalism is inherently criminal is. - Social problems affecting today's young people and their solutions are different from what it was ten years ago. People changed the society they live in. The problems experienced by our grandparents and parents are different from our parents and ours. Today, young people face two major social problems that affect their lives. These social problems are drugs and violence. Three theoretical perspectives of functionalism theory, conflict theory and symbolic interaction theory lead sociological thinking of social problems. These views are seeing the same social problem, but they do so in different ways. Their shared view provides a more comprehensive understanding of social issues than any view. Table 1 "Theoretical Snapshot" is a summary of three viewpoints. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and social stability requires complete socialization and social integration. The social social system plays an important function to ensure social stability. Slow social change is desirable, but rapid social change threatens social order The comparison between Marxism and Functionalism is different in social function between functionalist and Marxist. Marxism was founded by Karl Marx. Marx believes that society can be divided into two parts, an economic foundation, infrastructure and superstructure. Functionalists considers society as a group of parts that together form a whole. Functionalism is also known as a consensus theory. - The anti-cultural movement of the 1960s was a reaction to the forgotten history of the 1950s. Historical oblivion was made to deny racial behavior in the 1950s. Since America began to become the world's largest country after the Second World War, the United States needs to provide a "free" image to the world.

The ideological field JürgenHabermas called "public domain" laid the foundation for discussion in the public sector of modern society. But the new mass media revolutionized the public domain. In one generation, the Internet has evolved into a tool to promote public domain phenomena by changing the way new technologies, people, businesses and governments interact and participate. It also changed society by linking individuals and communities, providing opportunities for information and education, and increasing transparency. In this article I will explain in detail the amount of content that can be displayed on the Internet. In the past decade, scholars have discussed a lot about the ability of the Internet to expand the public domain. They are focusing on the Internet's potential in promoting public places, clarity, equality and open dialogue among citizens can prosper. Optimists claim that Internet technology seems to meet all the basic requirements of the Habermas public domain. It is a universal, anti-hierarchical, complex, demanding dialogue model. "The Internet seems to be the most ideal speech situation, because it provides universal access, unnecessary communication, freedom of speech, unlimited agenda, participation in activities other than traditional political institutions, and public opinion through the discussion process "However, some qualified comments should be considered" "The Internet is active in the dramatic differentiation of the current public domain, thematic debate, application of styles and related people It plays a vital role. " According to Papacharissi, intention and related technology created a new public place for conversation. "Depending on the technology, is this public space beyond the public domain? Papacharissi (2002) believes that the Internet provides unprecedented information. This will contribute to the general discussion on political issues. - Criminal law and criminal law are always sensitive topics for people, criminal law deals with matters of morality, authority, equity and integrity - they are all aspects of the public and can have a strong belief . As we all know, financial, media, education, and law are the foundation of society - two of them are also essentially linked through society: media and law In the past decade, scholars have discussed a lot about the ability of the Internet to expand the public domain. They are focusing on the Internet's potential in promoting public places, clarity, equality and open dialogue among citizens can prosper. Optimists claim that Internet technology seems to meet all the basic requirements of the Habermas public domain. It is a universal, anti-hierarchical, complex, demanding dialogue model. The introduction of the new public domain requires fragmentation. "Public" is not a physical entity, it can not be positioned, there is no markup. "Public" is a collection of fictional people, the public domain is a fictional place. It is the space between the state (government) and the civilian private sector (family). After all, it is a replacement infrastructure, in which case it will be a social media platform, especially Facebook. Facebook's infrastructure allows free flow of information and ideas, reviews of concerns of the public, formation of public opinion and dissemination of public opinion to public institutions. Authorities are responsible for their actions and must make changes based on public consensus.

The core of the criminal reform proposed in Cesare Beccaria 's 1764 Dei delitti e delle pene (about crime and punishment) is the principle of criminal simplification resulting from the correct interpretation of social contracts. Punishment, as long as there is no essential virtue, needs to be prevented as much as possible, not only necessary evil; its application strictly obeys the principle of legality. Therefore, the criminal philosophy of Beccaria is trying to greatly reduce the power of the penal institution. After explaining its main aspects, this paper seeks to present a new interpretation of Bekkalia's theory from the perspective of its historical background. The philosophers of the Italian Illuminati are not resentful of the cruelty of Milan's penalties system, but rather expressed a riot that impels political control of aristocracy whose power has been confirmed by its judicial function did. In this regard, Beccaria is trying to fight the political hegemony of law scholars and to complete the thesis by eliminating legal thought and thus excluding the intellectual foundation of criminal law practice. Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794) is the founder of "ideological classics" in criminal science. In fact, he may be the originator of criminal study itself. His booklet "Paper of criminal and punishment" was one of the first works to clarify the cause of the crime. (Jones 3) Rational choice theory is deeply influenced by the classical school of Beccaria. According to theory criminals will compare and consider the benefits and consequences of the offense they are trying to commit. If professional players have more than strengths and weaknesses, perpetrators will commit crimes. Conversely, if a criminal is afraid to punish more than he desires, he will not commit sin. (Siegel 72-73) Rational choice theory is based on the utilitarianism of Cesare Beccaria, a classical school philosophy promoted by Jeremy Bentham. They believe that if they can make a firm decision, they will be deterrents of crime in proportion to crime, and that risk is likely to exceed the interests of perpetrators. In Dei delitti e delle pene (On Crimes and Punishments, 1763-1764), Beccaria advocates rational writing tests. Beccaria considers punishment a necessary application of the criminal law, so the judge just adjusts his judgment to the law. Beccaria also insists against distinguishing between crime and sin, against the death penalty and torture and inhuman treatment. Cesare Beccaria started writing a brief article on crime and punishment in 1764. Bccaria opposed the death penalty for two current classical reasons: First, it was an insult to human dignity and conscience stain. Any society that supports it; second, it is a real failure that it is more likely to promote crime than to oppress it. Beccaria did not emphasize the third common claim, but modern contemporary attempts such as Jeremy Bentham soon introduced this: if the victim was found to be innocent. The only death that can not be reversed is death.

Criminology has evolved into a field independent of history. And it became the integration of various theories along the way of its development and development from multiple sources. The reason for trying to explain crime and deviant behavior reflects the time of the study, as time goes on, people should have more theories to integrate into the theory of the past and become more comprehensive . It is important to understand this development from the theory formation, the evolution of tests, the determinants of the test, and social learning, and these processes are considered to be strong empirical theories. Criminal science is defined as a scientific method of studying crime and its behavior (1), but the definition of more classical criminal science described by Edwin Sutherland and Donald Cresse is related to the subject of crime as a social phenomenon is. The process of enacting the law, breaking the law and responding to the violation ... The purpose of criminal science is to develop common proven principles and other kinds of knowledge about the process. And treatment. "(2) A study of crime and criminal study. Criminal research is the accumulation of beliefs, ideas, norms and laws in various societies for centuries. Because crime is part of every human society, criminal investigation is also essential for every society. In this project report I will discuss the criminal school of various ideologies, from the beginning of the 17th century to the modern criminal thought group. Criminal universities are widely accepted By definition, criminal science is a scientific study of crime as a social phenomenon including criminals and criminal treatment. Origin of criminal origin was rooted in the 18th century when society believed that crime was the result of supernatural power. This devil's opinion supports the idea of ​​tempting to bring out evil forces to individuals (Cullen & Agnew, 2011, p. 21). Once possessed, a person is deceived by sinful behavior. This belief is everywhere and accepted as it has a close relationship between government and religion in executing the rules. In the 19th century, Cesare Beccaria and Cesare Lombroso began to challenge this ideal by proposing two new radical methods. Beccaria introduced a classic criminal logic theory that emphasizes behavior and Langrolo proposed his positive school of criminal emphasis on science to explain the crime. In essence, both theories help to guide analysis and understanding of crime.

Humanity is a common term in today's society. On the other hand, there are not only personal concepts, but also a number of concepts centered on this concept. With the rise of capitalism, social structure has been reformed, John Rock, Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau introduced the difference. watch. Western philosophers focus primarily on the concept of social contract. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

Comparing Hobbes and Locke's social contract version of Leviathan's author Thomas Hobbs argues that peace and unity can best be achieved by allowing humans to agree on contracts to tie society ( Hobbes: Chapter 18, page 548)) There is responsibility to protect society and the monarchies of the country to rule Hobbes society. In his introduction, Hobbes expressed Federation as an "artificial man" and expressed it as imitating the physical politics of the body. Hobbes described the state as a figure of a huge human being built on the body of its members and built as sovereignty as its sovereignty (Hobbes: Introduction, p. 492). In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

Wilson and Kelling (1982) judged that disability and fear are closely related to the recognition of disability, fear or crime, which led the community members to take precautionary measures. , P. 254). Broken window theory believes that confusion is likely to be susceptible to crime because the potential criminals show the possibility of committing a crime, so that the area disturbed by the collapse caused by the community is susceptible to crime. There are various theories about the cause of the crime. As long as a crime occurs, it affects these behaviors. The problem surfaced due to the crime. For example, what is the cause of the crime and the crime of the individual? The best theory to answer each question is the classic criminal theory. The classical theory is simply that anyone who violates the law will do so with free will and understand its effect. Classical theorists believe that "the faster you give more punishment, the more effective it is." Classical theorists will help influence and shape the US criminal justice system. Many classical philosophers have proposed their own arguments around this theory. One argument points out that because punishment is more serious, punishment will deter people from crime. The classic theory best describes the crime as it can define many other types of criminal traits. Criminology tries to establish a theory that explains why a particular crime occurred and why the criminal committed the crime. Please test these theories by observing behavior and research statistics. Then criminal logic theory is used to shape how society responds to crime, to prevent future criminal cases, and to respond to criminals who committed these offenses. In the early nineteenth century, modern criminology began to materialize, criminal research was regarded as a subfield of psychology, sociology and economics. Meanwhile, the Criminal Studies Association and Criminal Studies Journal began to emerge, and criminalists observed and experimented according to their theory.

In theory, criminal studies are trying to understand crime and previous models. Crime studies are also described as interdisciplinary professionals built on scientific research on crime and criminal behavior, including its forms, causes, legal aspects and controls. Criminal studies are regarded as an act of studying the cause of criminal activity and social response to crime or social science. Criminal study conducts research in various fields such as the incidence rate, form, cause and effect of crime, regulation of society and government, and correspondence to crime. Some criminal studies have many definitions, others say that criminal studies are investigating crime from a social and personal point of view. In terms of educational methods, criminal science is defined as social science, not only paying attention to the causes and prevention of crime, but also paying attention to social impact and the reaction of crime. In addition to criminals themselves, others say that criminal study is criminal justice and criminal system research. Sutherland believes that "the purpose of criminal science is to develop a range of universal and proven principles and other kinds of knowledge about law, crime and preventive treatment processes" (T. Newburn (2007) ). Psychology, law, anthropology, and many others have also helped crime studies and influence, which helps to better understand the subject matter. New Bern (2007) In theory, criminal studies are trying to understand crime and previous models. Crime studies are also described as interdisciplinary professionals built on scientific research on crime and criminal behavior, including its forms, causes, legal aspects and controls. Criminal studies are regarded as an act of studying the cause of criminal activity and social response to crime or social science. - Classical criminal classics of criminal schools in the 18th century. Prior to this, a new naturalistic approach by social contractor theorists challenged the former important important spiritual point of view about the definition of crime and criminal acts. Classical schools are an established idea of ​​monarchs, federal lords, and fathers' fathers. In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural defects. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members

In this chapter we will critically consider how the change in feminist values ​​will affect the contribution to criminal science. This is based on the recommendations reviewed by Becker (1967), Morris, Woodward and Peters (1998), and recently Librin (2001) and Cohen (2011). What kind of aspects are taken when conducting research? The "two-sided" problem reflects concerns raised by feminist researchers of modernist and post-modernism, so they were put together at once to form the central theme of this chapter. These issues include not only the value basis of the research (Roman and Apple, 1990; Oakley, 2000; Noddings 2003) but also the practices of power supporting research and theoretical generation (Wolf, 1992, Davis 2008). In this chapter we will explore five value-related tensions that affect today's feminist criminal science. The problems inherent in these tensions are concerns about research, and how to study, in theory, female crime, and inevitably the risk of female violation. Feminist criminology has been required to challenge not only sexism but also other discrimination acts within the criminal justice system. Chesney-Lind (2006) and Burgess-Proctor (2006) have used age, class, gender, race, and gender to understand crime, but in this theory the influence of these micro factors I have not considered it sufficiently. I will cross. In this chapter we will first examine the value of feminism and cross impact and how contributions of age, class, sex, sex, race, gender to crime contribute to the future development of criminal logic theory. This concern for feminist criminology and criminal science is trying to explain criminal behavior related to women. It includes a wide range of issues facing women in the criminal justice system and society. Feminist criminology is still a relatively new subfield of criminal science. It was developed in the 1970s, but it has just started to gather attention in the past 30 years. Because this is related to crime, it is a field that focuses on the bias of women's problems. According to surveys so far, women have not committed crimes as much as men and have committed less violent crimes than men. But it is equally important to understand how they commit crimes. Legislators may establish laws based on the theoretical interpretation of criminal acts. Therefore, the theory of conformity for both men and women is important. During this semester, I learned a lot about criminology. I learned the difference between criminal justice and criminal study. Criminal study is a study of crime and criminal behavior (Hagan p. 453). On the other hand, criminal justice is a law enforcement system used at all stages of police, lawyers, courts, disciplinary measures ("Criminal Justice | Definition of Criminal Justice at Dictionary.com"). It is also considered a practical system Criminal justice and criminal studies have tremendous growth over the past few years due to the widespread availability in the criminal law and criminal justice field at the undergraduate and graduate level and the increased admission rate in the US and internationally I am experiencing. . Paradigm shift in evolution involves the definition of cyber crime in academic disciplines and practical terms. Although it has been recognized for a long time as a major field of sociology, criminal studies itself is an independent discipline field, an academic field that continues to evolve. Today, criminology is still of a theoretical nature, but because of its more focused, it is more relevant to academic and practitioner concerns in criminal justice and related professional services.

Due to the lack of law to protect women, the impact on society through the 20th century, women had to rely on unsafe abortion methods. In 1969, Henery Morgentaler opened the first abortion clinic to help women of unwanted pregnancy. The clinic is one of the main factors in the complete legalization of abortion, attracting the attention of the Canadian government. In previous studies, abortion discussion shows that consensus on moral and legal status of abortion is rising. Before 1969 abortion was all illegal in Canada. In 1969, as far as the doctor's committee signed the conditions necessary for the physical and mental health of the mother, the Act on Penal Code Amendment in 1968 - 1969 legalized the abortion. In 1988, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that R. v. In Morgentaler's lawsuit the current law is unconstitutional and the 1969 law was decided to be abolished. There is no legal delay and most abortions occur at an early stage. In 1869, Canada banned abortion altogether. Like other countries, illegal abortion is still in progress, and in some cases the assertion leads to the death of a woman. An early example attracted a lot of attention in the abortion trial at Emily Stow (1879). In another such case, Azoulay v. The Queen arrived at the Supreme Court in 1952. In both cases, so-called abortion providers eventually became innocent. An important issue for Canadian feminist's second wave is the availability of abortion. By 1969, according to the Penal Code, abortion is a criminal offense and women died as a result of attempted abortion outside the law. For these reasons, in 1969 Congress legalized abortion in accordance with the 1968 - 1969 criminal law amendment law. Abortion, as long as the continuation of the pregnancy will not be first approved by the reason of "Do endanger her life or health, or there is a possibility that endanger", abortion is still a crime. Abortion must be done in a hospital, not in a clinic. Only one of the five hospitals were asked to approve the action to the Commission, as a result, many women across the border to the United States only once. By 1970, the national women mobilized to organize off-road abortion caravan from Vancouver to Ottawa, sought to increase the flexibility of reproduction by increasing access to abortion and birth control.

Many factors determine why criminals do their acts, and the victims are abandoned for many years with no answers. Many offenders start with a small slap in the wrist, but then they believe they can get more things without being punished until they tell a lie. Because my wife at home excited me about her fourth pregnancy and she had planned when and why excuses, lies, and how to get rid of her, so the crime is nothing to do with our nose It happened below. My first proposal is to have your daughter and yourself know more about what these two different departments are (criminal justice and forensic medicine). The criminal justice curriculum consists of the contents of law enforcement, various subsets of the criminal justice system, and in general the past, present and future perspectives of the criminal justice system (police, prisons, crime laboratories, terrorism), federal law enforcement , White collar crime, history, criminal science etc. Scientific investigative science is like this: a science-based road that emphasizes chemistry, biology, physics, and blood splatter analysis. Criminal justice and forensic medicine are two degrees that are often pursued by enthusiastic people who are truly interested in the criminal justice system. Indeed, to any extent in these sectors, there is the possibility of leading to a law enforcement agency involved in various abilities, such as crime scene analysis, crime scene investigation, forensic science and technology personnel. Nonetheless, there are some similarities between the two research areas, but any ambitious student should be aware of these differences. Therefore, the following information shows a summary and a parallel comparison of the two research fields in order to make it more convenient. Generally, schools that provide criminal justice proceedings classify forensic science as former, so students of such institutions should acquire a criminal trial degree with emphasis on comprehensive knowledge of forensic medicine and both I can. However, in other cases, the degrees to be offered will be separate, but there may be considerable overlap between the two. However, apart from this, the two research fields began to be different. The criminal trial investigation focuses on crime, but it can be used to investigate the cause of the crime, the response from the law enforcement agency, and the prophylactic method for future consideration and use. Therefore, students pursuing a criminal justice degree can participate in courses on law and theory, law enforcement philosophy and theory, sociology and criminal behavior, and other criminology courses.

Thereafter, five items were deleted from the study of Kim et al. (2005) Whether two types of bullying were measured to find some correlation between the level of distortion and the level of personal bullying. These five projects are to fight or promote others, to make fun of other people, to fight other people, to annoy others, to awaken and push other people . In this study, the control variables used were sex, physical fitness, grade, and parental income. The result of the first round of the questionnaire shows that the correlation between family conflict and parent's punishment is likely to lead to bullying. In this article, to prove this, criminal logic theory such as strain theory and label theory is used to outline the main evidence supporting crime, sacrifice, and social class, and critically evaluate To do. With this in mind, the text restrictions in this article pay special attention to crime and damage of the lower class of society. This class was originally defined by Karl Marx and related to production means and talks about two major classes, bourgeois assetist classes and workers of state proliferation of proletarian assets (Giddens, 2001). His theory has been rigorously reviewed and it is now believed that classes are more flexible than Marx's first interoperability, income, wealth and status, and consideration of this culture and consumption pattern (Giddens, 2001). In the middle of the eighteenth century, criminal studies emerged as social philosophers pondered the concepts of crime and law. Over time, schools of several ways of thinking were formed. In the early criminal logic theory, there are three main ideas covering the middle of the 18th century to the middle of the 20th century. Classical, positive, and Chicago. These school groups have been replaced by a number of contemporary criminal paradigms such as subculture, control, crisis management, labeling, critical criminology, cultural criminology, postmodern criminal science, feminist crime science. This article focuses on information about crime. I explain various theories about criminal science. The main concern is criminal science and its two theories. Criminal study is a study of criminal factors that cause that phenomenon. Such a crime may be of personal or social nature. It involves enacting the law, breaking the law, and trying to weaken the law. Criminal study focuses on social, cultural and personal reasons for illegal activity. Criminal studies are directly related to sociology and psychology in all fields dealing with group or individual behavior. However, unethical or obscene acts may be a criminal act, unless the act is prohibited by the state.

Law enforcement has three important issues, law enactment, police discretion and crime valuation. For society represented by these laws, various organizations create and develop laws. In the United States, the criminal justice system is divided into two modes: agreement model and conflict model. The process of achieving justice includes three basic aspects. It is police, justice, and punishment. The two modes of the criminal justice system are affected by many factors. The first model is a consensus model. Consensus model believes that most citizens of society have the same shared values ​​and beliefs. Examples ... Read more To illustrate this point, two men fought at Times Square. A nearby policeman noticed the riot and tried to separate the two men rather than arrest them on the spot. In this hypothetical situation, the police need to use discretion to determine the best way to deal with this situation. But sometimes the police discretion can cause more problems than solving the problem. Police are said to have been summoned to the scene where the husband was very aggressive to his wife. The police thought that the situation was not serious and left the scene. The next day, the police station got a call of murder. When they arrived at the scene, the police noticed that it was the same couple the day before. Of the 84 cases in the report, it is detailed that 135 cases including suicide were fatal. 48 out of 84 cases were abused by abusers, police previously asked for domestic violence. "Report in Western Australia: Victims of Domestic Violence in the Criminal Justice System 's Failure. Sometimes, unlimited use of discretionary rights may lead to denial of civil rights, and occasionally the use of unlimited discretion leads to denial of civil rights and the possibility of creating many deficiencies in the justice system. Or constituting another definition The components of the criminal justice system include the police, the court system and the correctional institution. Describe the definitions, functions, and examples of each component of the US criminal justice system. Detailed criminal proceedings and criminal proceedings will also be explained. The criminal justice system is part of the criminal justice system and consists of three main elements. These elements are policies, courts and corrections. Each component is defined according to the US criminal justice system. The main functions of each component are also determined, and two examples of each component are given. Ultimate ... Read more In the United States, the criminal justice system deals with criminal management and judicial administration. The criminal justice system consists of three major and distinguishable elements of police, court, and disciplinary action. These components are also called subsystems. From this point of view, the components of the criminal justice system are considered to be interrelated, interdependent and working to achieve a unified goal. In view of this criminal trial, there is a tendency to focus on how the incident flows in the system, and when an incident moves from one component to another it causes a chain reaction. For example, the behavior of the street police affected the work of the courts, and the judges of the courts affected the operation of prisons and prisons. The police have a special place in the criminal justice system. It is said that the activities of the police authorities not only affect the function of the criminal justice system as a whole but also the "gatekeeper" of that system. Perhaps the most common decision by the police ... the journey of the accused criminal through the maze of criminal justice in the United States "(Alpert and Dunham, 1997: 11)

In the criminal procedure, there are two main forms of crime management model and proper procedure model. The crime management model focuses on suppressing crime in a quick and decisive way. Because there is little evidence to prove that the suspect is guilty, using "presumption of guilty" speeds up the process. In this model, people think that the law should be made more stringent, the police should be increased, and the sentence should be more severe. It is more reliable so that the program model has more steps. The two criminal models for which the due process and crime management model have been mutually conflicting over the years are the due process model and the crime management model. The principle of the due process model is that we can not deprive life, freedom, or wealth from individuals without proper legal procedures and protection measures. (Answers.Com) Those charged with crime must be protected by the criminal justice system in the proper process mode. - Crime prevention and proper procedures are two different types of ideal criminal justice. They can be said to be the extremum of the continuum. The role of crime prevention is to eliminate criminals and protect innocent people. The criminal justice duty process model is like a barrier course and must go through a legal barrier to ensure that the right person is determined. In Canada, police tend to manage crime, courts tend to be proper procedures In the criminal procedure, there are two main forms of crime management model and proper procedure model. The crime management model focuses on suppressing crime in a quick and decisive way. Because there is little evidence to prove that the suspect is guilty, using "presumption of guilty" speeds up the process. In this model, people think that the law should be made more stringent, the police should be increased, and the sentence should be more severe. - The criminal justice system is often made up of inconsistent models and theories. These models include crime management models, appropriate processes, models, consensus models, and conflict models. In this paper, we evaluate and define these models and each entity of the criminal justice system of each model. Police, correction, and court systems agree to each model in some way, and in a hurry to cope with this correspondence.

Comparing Hobbes and Locke's social contract version of Leviathan's author Thomas Hobbs argues that peace and unity can best be achieved by allowing humans to agree on contracts to tie society ( Hobbes: Chapter 18, page 548)) There is responsibility to protect society and the monarchies of the country to rule Hobbes society. In his introduction, Hobbes expressed Federation as an "artificial man" and expressed it as imitating the physical politics of the body. Hobbes described the state as a figure of a huge human being built on the body of its members and built as sovereignty as its sovereignty (Hobbes: Introduction, p. 492). In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

The crime management model and the fair process model are two different but similar models determined by Herbert Pecker for use in the criminal justice process. But the importance of these models in the criminal justice process. Whether these two models need to be somewhat similar results. In order to answer these questions, this article explains the meaning of the two models and examines the differences between the two models. Abstract: Herbert Packer describes two criminal proceedings models, a criminal management model and a proper procedural model. The crime management model thinks that the most important function of the criminal justice system is to fight crime. Due process model focuses on process error prone. The Criminal Management Code stipulated the collection of foreign evidence by prosecutors and deprived the proper procedural value of the mutual legal aid treaty explicitly prohibiting the use of evidence by the accused. In this article, we will open up a new world by building a framework that protects both appropriate program standards while maintaining an effective crime management model. In 1964, the famous Stanford University law school professor Herbert Parker proposed two basic criminal justice models: a criminal management model and a proper procedural model. A crime management model is regarded as a conservative approach to crime, with emphasis on protecting society from criminals by regulating criminal behavior and justice. On the contrary, the due process model is considered to be a liberal approach to criminal justice, which promotes criminal rights. The function of this model is to be innocent until the defendant is guilty. In the criminal procedure, there are two main forms of crime management model and proper procedure model. The crime management model focuses on suppressing crime in a quick and decisive way. Because there is little evidence to prove that the suspect is guilty, using "presumption of guilty" speeds up the process. In this model, people think that the law should be made more stringent, the police should be increased, and the sentence should be more severe. - The criminal justice system is often made up of inconsistent models and theories. These models include crime management models, appropriate processes, models, consensus models, and conflict models. In this paper, we evaluate and define these models and each entity of the criminal justice system of each model. Police, correction, and court systems agree to each model in some way, and in a hurry to cope with this correspondence.

Organized crime is a complex animal. It is defined as a group of highly centralized projects of multinational, national or local governments, most commonly managed by offenders who intend to conduct illegal acts to gain financial gain (FBI, 2010). Organized crime is unique in terms of organizational elements. This organizational structure helps to distinguish between the definition of organized crime and the group definition of people involved in criminal activities. (FBI, 2010). According to organized crime analyst Kristin Finklea, in the Congressional Report of 2010, the organizational aspects needed to organize crime required specific organizational elements. According to Liddick's view (1999 organizational crime theory can be divided into three major theoretical prototypes: a foreign conspiracy / bureaucratic paradigm, a corporate approach, and a customer-customer relationship perspective. The main characteristic of crime is its hierarchical organization and people seek adjustment and conspiracy, which is the mainstream of law enforcement in North America and has been very unsuccessful in understanding and coping with organized crime ( Geary, 2002) Although the leader of the criminal group of the fixed organization is supposed to end the criminal activity, it definitely does not kill the key person, collapse the organization and prevent the criminal activity. According to Lyman (2007) "The theory of organized crime theory helps to understand criminal organizations There are three ways to organize crime to help understand criminal organizations: the first theory is American Secondly, rational choice theory refers to the strengths and weaknesses of balanced lifestyle of human rights, and they also describe what the consequences of their actions are know. There are several theories about the origins and causes of organized crime. One of them is alien conspiracy theory. The conspiracy theory of aliens thinks that the cause of criminal activity is external influence. This argues that criminals moved to the United States and established criminal organizations here (Rogers, 2011). This theory is supported by American film director. Most movies about organized crime draw an organization leader as a foreigner. They walk, clothes, and act in some way. Alien conspiracy theory claims that organized crime was prominent in Sicily in the 1860s and Sicilian immigrants consisted of a family of offenders ruled by 25 or so Italians. These families, also known as La Cosa Nostra, are composed of about 1,700 wise men or men (Lyman & Potter, 2007). This theory also shows strong family ties

The authors strongly support the idea that deterrence punishment is reasonable, as people frequently follow the law after calculating the results of laws on specific criminal acts. Punishing perpetrators to prevent others from committing the same crime again will not guarantee that we will not commit any crime, but will certainly reduce the number of people committing the same crime in the future. An important variation of the results-oriented approach is focusing on deterrence. It is reasonable to punish with deterrence if punishment prevents and / or prevents the criminal and other people from failing the law. The deterrence theory has been criticized as dealing with barbarians, not rational actors who can respond to moral reasons. The deterrent theory has also been criticized for allowing people not legally punished to be punished when they succeed in preventing others from breaking the law. Finally, the deterrence theory has been criticized for making the parameters of appropriate punish too broad, not to be given the punishment to prevent people from being justified. Punish their tendency to recover or deter. Punishment is only for punishment (there is no deterrent or healing effect), it seems immoral to Utilitarians not only doing nothing in the case of suffering but also revenge. What do you think of Utilitarian penalty theory? As you can see, there are many opponents to it. Utilitarianism can be punished for reasons of rehabilitation and deterrence. 10 people think that rehabilitation will not function, deterrent will not be that good. He made this claim because there is no reliable evidence that the rehabilitation program can reduce the recidivism rate. According to Ten, the difference between letting an individual stop and rehabilitating an individual is that deterrents prevent that individual from committing a crime and rehabilitation prevents that individual from committing another crime.

Body modification is not only suitable for roughness and toughness. Since the 1990's, the popularity of basic remodeling such as pierced earrings and tattoos has increased. They can be used as souvenirs for events of specific life, to express individuality, or to adapt to current trends. Most people do not consider possible relationships between physical and psychological factors. As they become more common, Americans should pay more attention to psychological problems related to physical change. There is increasing evidence that individuals are facing the risk of crime. Theoretical methods of biology, psychology, sociology are trying to explain the relationship between these risk factors and criminal acts related to Ryan. There is no consensus on the relative value of these theories, and it may be more important by the individual more or less the chance mechanism. A study of criminal logic theory is an opportunity to analyze crimes by explaining criminals and criminal acts. Each theory explains the cause of the crime and makes logic to appeal the crime. Understanding the dilemma affecting social structure, behavior and change can make it easier to understand what steps you need to take to prevent actions and criminal behavior. The term "psychosocial" literally indicates a close relationship between psychological factors and social factors. Psychological factors in emotional and cognitive development and the role of social factors in the formation of human relations play an important role in the growth of human development. Psychosocial factors have a major impact on the mental health of children. Research on interpersonal relationship of children in family and society Basement relationship affects children's normal and abnormal behavior Depression is one of the most common psychological disorders. Depression can be caused by various factors including interpersonal relationships. Interpersonal relationships are relations between individuals, and each person's reactions and emotions are expressed directly and carefully with each other. Common interpersonal relationships include (a) family relationships between parents, parents and children, (b) a social environment where differences in ethnicity and social class play a role, (c) relationship between women and men Gender interaction in different age groups

The opening paper proposes two criminal definitions based on the consensus paradigm and crime dispute model. It then explains a certain type of crime, ie murder. This article also applies three persuasive lawsuits on my specific type of crime. It will discuss how rational choice theory and deterrence theory agree in my case. Finally, in this article I will define that one of the main problems in our "structured society" is crime. The theorists have two main perspectives, which are used to explain the opinions contradictory to consensus crime. There are two main conflicts between crime and punishment. Initially in the internal conflict, Raskolnikov chose to kill the pawnbroker. He thinks that in his mind he goes beyond the ordinary people Superman, and that he does benefit everyone. Raskolnikov tried to streamline the killing, but after the massacre he soon realized he could not deal with the crime of crime. His mental state became unstable because he had a hard time maintaining the timing of the innocent town. Las Kolnikov's civil war extends throughout the novel, and his overwhelming sin separates him from his heart. Only under the guidance of Sonya, he can choose to recognize and mitigate his burden. Killing is very wrong, is considered a very bad sin ... or is it? Sometimes killing is part of life, people have no choice but to kill for their own survival. Murder is wrong when someone commits murder due to jealousy or pure joy. Sometimes people have no choice but to oblige someone else than to kill like protection. In Ambrose Bierce's "Knight in the Sky" and Tim O'Brien's "ambush", two young people were for protection and they had to kill in order to be their responsibility. The way to kill both stories is understandable and correct in a sense. (This is wrong compared to the killing.) Sophie has the option of killing one of two children or killing both. She has no choice but to act. This is not my judgment, but since she knows that she feels guilty, not her judgment, but the rest of her life is posterior reasoning. The selection of Sophie belongs to the moral world, but it exceeds the range of moral norms. The prohibition of "Allowing a child ..." is not morally accepted. Although Sophie must be immoral, therefore, you can adopt the method, but there is no moral error. I can not say to anyone that "You saved the wrong child." In fact, we believe that moral norms should not be applied. We are shocked, like brothers and sisters. "My religion makes me do this" (by Sartre's self-awareness), and I suggest that Sophie might prefer her senior children but may condemn her faith To do.

Tradition of social contract: Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau Abstract: The tradition of traditional contract of Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau enjoy such fame and acceptance as the basis of the development of liberal democratic theory and practice ing. Especially from the edge to critics. However, the tradition of contract raises the challenge that must change in modern social and political realm. And it will immediately promote extreme nationalism and inevitable globalization. The classic social contract tradition of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau is different in theme and focus, but enjoying this reputation and acceptance. It is the basis for the development of the theory and practice of liberal democracy, heresy for all scholars. Evil theories, in particular from the edge or end of the mainstream (social - political) philosophy academics, are concerned with positive, side, anal, rear or subsurface attacks and criticisms. However, given the fact that the reality of convergence in the modern social and political world promptly promotes extreme nationalism and inevitable globalism, the tradition of social contracts is accepted in various ways with new insights and explanations It brings tough tasks. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

Introduction In recent years, criminal science has become science, social scientists and criminologists have formed various theories and views in this regard. With the development of sociology as a new academic discipline and the definition of Conde 's sociology in August 1822, it opened the way to the development of criminal science as a new research department. The branch conducted a criminal investigation and gradually developed into the academic field of the UK in the 1950s. Cesare There is some debate about the historical development of criminal science, but by the early 1960s I agreed that discipline that can be identified in the form of contemporary British criminology (Tierney, 2006). Nic Groombrigde (2001: 202) defines pathology as "an unhealthy deviation from the standard", ie, "individuals at genetic, hormonal or mental level". After all, this means that the crime is abnormal, that is, it is not normal. Criminologists have come up with various theories about why people commit crimes and recommend answers. Classical criminal studies believe that perpetrators are free will, reasonable and ordinary, and the positivist law shows that criminals are determined and pathologic. Whether they are sick or not In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural flaws. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members

Today's law outlines past and present principles around the world. Early legal practices are the foundation of the law we are currently accustomed to and following it. These customs are known as classicalists. But as time went on, various criminologists changed the early incomplete ideas and made them more complete and practical for more modern times. This new version is called a positivist school. This rapid change from classicism to positivism is due to the change and development of civilization. In the past 250 years, criminal studies have various theories. Early in the 18th century, criminal study was able to be traced as a research field, but at that time, the view that Cesare Beccaria in Italy and Jeremy Bentham in the UK at the time should each receive punishment Respectively. Because it is very tough, criminals will judge that pleasure of criminal act is not worth punishment. Classic Crime Academy What is criminal study? In short, criminal study is a study of criminal behavior. Questions answered in the field of criminal science, why do people feel offended? What are the factors affected by criminal acts? Criminology provides answers through the theoretical interpretation of crime. Criminology is always a male-led field, and male criminals are the main subject of research and theoretical development research. For these reasons, women have been excluded from these studies. In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural defects. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members

The responsibility of the police is to maintain public order, to prevent and detect crime. Since the ancient Romans had the theory that "Peacekeeping Army" would reduce crime and violence, the concept of police, also known as police and law enforcement agency, always existed. This theory adheres to society and still exists today. Police officers take a mission when entering police cars, their mission is to enforce the code of conduct or law. Of course, it is dangerous to complete this task. Normally, when the police leave the house and work, they are worried about starting installation, such as "Returning home after the end of the day" and "Will not a simple traffic jam become worse and someone will die" To do. This is part of the work pressure and most people are trained to cope with this stress. Regarding training, high school students can take several courses to prepare law enforcement agencies. We encourage you to use criminal justice as a higher education major for students in psychology, sociology, foreign languages, and computer courses in this program. Participating in sports increases the chances of becoming a legal officer. Other student activities will help this career as it will help to improve leadership skills and other publications. Entitlement requirements differ for each law enforcement agency, but most people need to obtain a university degree. You can have police science, justice, administration or criminal justice degree to qualify for employment. English, sociology, psychology, PC operation, criminal trial investigation and criminal principles are necessary courses to complete criminal trial occupation. These courses are offered at almost all universities throughout the country. ("Police and detectives") There are many universities offering associate degrees or criminal justice degrees or other types of law enforcement courses. However, I decide whether to participate in a two-year community college to acquire an associate degree or to acquire a four-year community or state university and a bachelor's degree. Among the universities offering associate degrees in criminal trials are Delaware Technical University and Community, Gibbs College, Hagerstown Business School. Some universities acquired bachelor 's degrees in criminal trials, such as Wilmington University, Brown University, Park University and others. To become a police requirement, a typical high school diploma is required up to the university degree. In addition, the police must graduate from the training school of their institution before undergoing field training. Candidates must be at least 21 years of age, are US citizens, and are eligible to obtain various personal and physical qualifications. The police are working in a dangerous, physical and stressful environment. The police brought out the most victims and the injured were injured. If you plan to become a law enforcement officer by acquiring a criminal justice degree, then according to BLS (2017) you are looking for a career with an average annual salary of $ 64,490. Please contact our website school for more information on entering this important occupation The employment expansion of the police seems not to be optimistic. According to the US Labor Statistics Bureau (BLS) from 2010 to 2020, the expected employment growth rate of police and detectives is only 7%. Citizen's expected employment growth rate in all occupations is 14%. Due to budgetary constraints, some communities have reduced labor and fewer executives. According to the BLS, fortunately, trained police officers who lost their jobs for budget cuts are not difficult to find jobs in other organizations. Everyone has a dream Life will succeed if dreams come true. I also dream of becoming a police officer. Police work - Police work is the police's obligation to maintain public order and prevent and detect the concept of criminal police, ie police and law enforcement agencies. Especially as a policeman, working for

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the conflict model and consensus paradigm and explain the relationship with these crimes. Disliked crime under the type of violent crime will be explained in detail and case examples gathering some attention related to this major crime will be appreciated. A consistent explanation of the strain theory will be elaborated, then an explanation based on the paradox paradigm will be provided. Defining an agreement is a way for criminologists to study crime in society. The concept of "born criminal" by Lombrozzo has assertions about the natural features and eternal existence of human social crimes. According to this concept, the type of "criminal's right" is characterized by a specific stigma (a mark to distinguish it from the type of "unbreakable" person). The basis of this classification is the study of his Italian criminals in about 400 prisons. Later, in this study, we found that the method used by Lombroso is not sufficient and the research group is not representative. Rombrroso compared his criminal with a mixed control group of Italian soldiers. Lombroso concluded that since more than five physical abnormalities were found in 43% of criminals, this confirms the hypothesis of his type of congenital crime that exists in the introduction of genes in early animal forms. In addition to the distinction between personal criminal and property crime, there are other more detailed differences between criminal acts. More common types of crime are violent crime, white-collar crime, corporate crime, organized crime, "no victim" crime. Other types not discussed in this article include hate crime, environmental crime, technical crime, and political crime. Violent crime FBI and most international police agencies are tracking four major violent crimes. Murder, rape, robbery and severe violence. Murder / non-crime massacre will deliberately kill people without excuses or reasons. In most cases, the accomplice is as guilty as a person who caused the death of the victim and the death of the victim directly. Rape involves illegal sexual intercourse with the will of the victim "Violent crime" means a crime in which the victim of the crime suffers violence or is being threatened by violence. According to US law, violent crimes include murder, rape, sexual assault, robbery, assault. Since these crimes are considered to be particularly serious, law enforcement agencies are closely followed and are generally more severely punished than other crimes. To my surprise, animals are still considered legitimate assets very similar to tables and chairs. Animal cruelty is obviously a matter of violence, as abusive crime takes into account the harm to people, not property, but animal cruelty is not a violent crime.

The danger of human experiments is often the theme of a novel, and Mary Sherry's Frankenstein is one such story. Dr. Frankenstein, the central figure, is caught by knowledge and when he pursued all the secrets of life he made monsters. Monsters are lonesome, loveless, terrible creatures. Creatures solved the destruction of Dr. Frankenstein's life by lamenting the day he founded and ultimately killing Dr. Frankenstein's family. Abstract: Trafficking is defined by international law and covers all forms of non-consensual exploitation. In other words, regardless of whether the victim's movement is involved or not, people are considered trafficked each time they are forced or deceived for exploitation. However, if economic vulnerability forces victims to accept exploitative labor arrangements, there is a big overlap in agreeing to exploitation. Agreeing to misuse is mainly resolved by social law and labor law, not by agreeing to abuse by criminal law. This is also a field where the World Bank has extensive experience. Both types of exploits adversely affect fairness and efficiency, which is an obstacle to development. The World Bank can consider considering strengthening efforts to deny exploitation, particularly in areas where access is not fair, authority is given to vulnerable groups and demands justice and good governance. The increasing confusion about exploit / trafficking terminology is that it is often difficult to distinguish between nonconsensus and voluntary exploitation in practice. In the latter case, the lack of economic necessity and opportunities for viable alternative revenue may allow the victim to "accept" the victim to engage in exploitative work arrangements. Moreover, economic theory does not distinguish between consensus and non-conspiracial exploitation. Both parties agree that exploitation not agreed is a matter of criminal justice law and that exploitation is essentially a matter of labor and social law. As detailed in the subsection below, Figure 1 above shows a conceptual relationship with various terms of exploitation, trafficking, forced labor.

Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau, Machiavelli From the 13th to the 18th century, the political realm of Western civilization changed dramatically. From the beginning of the scientific revolution, only during the Renaissance progress, secularization, and skepticism led not only to the intellectual life of the Western people but also to their political change. At the forefront of political discussion, there are Male Fluent Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. The influence of these people is often criticized, but it can be clearly seen for centuries and decades after their famous works. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory. Hobbies, rock and Rousseau. The contractual conditions assumed by these theories are not identical, they arise from the details of the original position assumed by a particular social contractor theorist. T. HoBBEs, LEVIATHAN, J. LOCKE, Civil Administration, J. See RoUSSEAu, Social Contract. Instead, make sure everyone is equal - a truly fair arrangement. 49 This equality does not exist in reality. This is because actual social contracts are concluded by parties who are most concerned about nurturing their own interests. Strong people can influence others and be able to secure contracts. We can not fairly and unfairly endorse the interests of the strong and sacrifice the weak. Therefore, thought experiments are necessary, Rawis is applied to all future arrangements, imagine situations where we must agree to the norm of justice rather than explain our specific interests I ask.

Identification 1) Specific deterrence and general deterrence: The purpose of punishing and intimidating civilians is to reduce, or at least limit, the frequency of social criminal activity in deterrence. The sole purpose of deterrence is to stop potential violations of people by inserting fear. Specific deterrence force applies only to individuals who are subject to certain types of punishment and ultimately fears that he / she will be punished again in the future when considering crime. When assessing whether deterrence is effective it is important to distinguish between general deterrence and specific deterrence. The general deterrence is the concept that everyone who is punished by law is an example of other people who are considering the same illegal acts. The specific deterrence power is the concept that an individual punished by law does not commit a crime any more in order to "learn the lesson". Repeatance means recidivism. In other words, people punished by the criminal justice system tend to re-attack at a very high rate. Some critics also believe that reasonable choice theory does not go well. They believe that the passionate crimes and criminal acts committed by people infected with drugs and alcohol are not the result of a reasonable cost-benefit analysis. There are two basic forms of deterrence: general deterrence and specific deterrence. Specific deterrence is designed to prevent perpetrators from committing such crimes in the future (deterrence theory, nd, p. 233). Deterrence is generally designed to prevent crimes committed by ordinary people. Therefore, the punishment of offenders by criminals is an example of other people in the general population who have not yet participated in criminal cases (deterrence theory, nd, p. 233). Some people may morally support deterrence against retaliation based on general deterrence, but they do not just try to hurt those who commit crimes, but simply try to prevent them. Overall deterrence, research showed that genes may or may cause criminal behavior (Daily reporter, November 2010). With this in mind, it is right to punish individuals for taking actions that might exceed their control.

From a Utilitarian point of view it seems easy to kill people and save millions of lives. But since I dismiss resultantism, I think that it is not enough to morally kill the very ideal result, so I would like to unite with Kant 's framework. The President has elected to kill millions of people and choose to distinguish him from innocent people, that moral reasoning can prove his death and lead people to some form of retaliation It is right for a doctor to kill the president because he wants. What? Resultualism and outcome not moral structuralism and non-resultivism are the two main concepts in moral research. Although results-oriented or "scopos theory" theory focuses on results, non-resultivism or "moral theory" theory does not care about results. The resultant's view is based on two major ethical theories, including moral egoism and utilitarianism. These theories agree that human behavior and behavior should produce favorable results. Moral theories are generally divided into three types: i) resultant theory focusing on the ethical impact of specific actions; ii) widely in the intentions of people who make ethical decisions about specific behaviors Non-result theory tends to focus. Unlike results theory and non-reactive theory, agent-centered theory pays more attention to the overall moral status of individuals and agents, and does not pay much attention to the morality of specific actions. Each of these three categories contains a variety of ethical methods, some of which have characteristics common to each category. Here are some of the most important and useful examples of these ethical approaches. The deterrence theory is often classified as a variant of the resulting punishment theory. Consensus theory is trying to prove that punishment is the best way to achieve a particular independent identifiable product (eg Bentham 1823; J. Wilson 1983; Walker 1991; legal penalty entry also reference). Various resultant theories describe the final benefit or goods to which all our actions are directed, but the most reasonable direct benefit that the penal system can bring is to reduce crime. For this reason, in the result-based theory, it is common to argue that punishment can reduce crime by deterring, slandering, or transforming a potential criminal. In particular, deterrence theory claims that punishment can serve a dual purpose: to prevent malicious or illegal acts of an individual (his or her own) punished in the future and to prevent others from doing similar behaviors To prevent taking things.

Walker's proposal No. 14 states that "deterrence program due to fear does not reduce crime". Discuss the theory of deterrence, the problem from theory to practice, and the failure of these programs. The basic definition of deterrence is to prevent crime by dealing with punishment etc as a threat. The deterrence theory is the foundation of the criminal law and justice system to deter crime. In response to the definition, the deterrent theory itself merely means that stricter and clearer penalties reduce crime rates, including violent crime, robbery, robbery, even drunk driving and even the possession of drugs. This theory applies to various ways of criminal infrastructure, in particular sociology in general, as a point of conflict theory or structural conflict in sociology and criminal sociology. Since this view is sufficiently wide per se, it takes a variety of positions. The theory of social collapse is based on the work of Henry McKay's Chicago School and Clifford R. Shaw. According to the theory of social collapse, communities suffering from poverty and economic deprivation tend to have high population turnover rates. This theory thinks that crime and prejudice are evaluated in social group, "subculture" or "gang". These groups have different values ​​for the most normative values ​​in society. These communities also tend to have high population heterogeneity. Due to the high turnover rate, informal social structures often do not develop, which makes it difficult for the community to maintain the social order. Before discussing the social realm of crime. Do I have to understand what crime is? "If an organization violates the criminal law, it may be defined as a crime." (Social Science, 2009, p. 556) "In sociology of crime, sociologists say you do not investigate the surrounding society Economic background can not understand crime correctly "(http://www.wisegeek.com/what- is sociology-criminology.htm The field of sociology in crime research is very large Sometimes offenders are caught, but sometimes it is not. Some criminals use it for advertising and some keep silent.The number of crimes is more than the number shown Sociological studies of crime are basically case studies of criminals who violate social rules rather than self propagation because there are always many problems and pain. Find topics As it is necessary, criminal investigation is always difficult (Sociology Production, 2009, 557 pages)

Behavioral assumptions are one of the basic theories of classical finance. Hypotheses, under the constraints of their resources, humans are trying to maximize their utility, which means the greatest benefits and results. The two most important features of human beings, based on behavior, are reason and self-interest. All theories of social science are implicitly or explicitly established in the concept of human behavior. Some methods rely on expected utility assumptions in economic theory or extend behavioral assumptions to other social science fields and are roughly called rational choice theory. Other methods cast some basic questions about traditional economic methods. Although few economists truly believe that the assumptions of behavioral behaviors accurately reflect human behaviors, they think that this assumption (in most cases) is a model of market behavior in economics I believe it will help to establish. It is too useful, but it is still the best. Learn politics and other social science games in town The basic assumptions on which crime analysis such as homology hypothesis depends are proven to be outdated by advances in psychology and behavioral science. Most profiling methods assume that behavior is mainly dependent on personality, not contextual factor. This is a hypothesis that psychology studies have been considered wrong since the 1960's. In the field of crime analysis, there are three main methods of criminal investigation law, clinical physician law and scientific statistical law. Criminal investigation methods are used by law enforcement agencies, more specifically by the Behavior Analysis Department (BAU) within FBI. The BAU is required by law enforcement agencies by reviewing and evaluating criminal acts by explaining the perpetrator's behavior during criminal activity, the perpetrator's interaction with the victim in the criminal process, and the situation at the crime scene We support. Learning criminal behavior is the same as all other acts. The theory was criticized as it is the first hypothesis that criminal activity is learned in a unique way from other acts. The main criticism derived from this hypothesis is that the theory is too wide by insisting on interpreting all actions. Acquisition of criminal activity is done through communication with people. Any form of communication is a viable way to learn about criminal behavior. Means of learning criminal behavior through communication include personal face-to-face communication, written communication such as letters and e-mail, video chat, telephone conversation, but not limited to them.

There is long debate, if so, this is the most effective way of dealing with crime. As long as there is a country, the bottom-up government of our country has already dumped this problem and the results are mixed. Until recently, deterrence was based entirely on fear of punishment. However, in recent years, we have deepened a more comprehensive understanding of crime and its roots in the more ideal part of society, especially in the minds of perpetrators. Through psychological research, especially free will, determinism, and social identity, we can discover that prevention of situational crime is a better way to prevent our crime. The need for an effective anti-criminal strategy in the US justice system was controversial. While adopting a confrontation model of criminal management and proper procedure, the United States is trying to balance between individual rights and social order. In this window of opportunity, crime management and proper procedures are reviewed and reflected in society's eyes. The main purpose of the US Criminal Justice System is to simply enforce the law and maintain social order while protecting people from unreasonable treatment. The criminal management model was created by Herbert Packer in the 1960's and is focused on arrest, indictment and conviction. The due process model focuses on the defendant's rights (Roberson, 2003, p 13) Abstract: Herbert Packer describes two criminal proceedings models, a criminal management model and a proper procedural model. The crime management model thinks that the most important function of the criminal justice system is to fight crime. Due process model focuses on process error prone. The Criminal Management Code stipulated the collection of foreign evidence by prosecutors and deprived the proper procedural value of the mutual legal aid treaty explicitly prohibiting the use of evidence by the accused. In this article, we will open up a new world by building a framework that protects both appropriate program standards while maintaining an effective crime management model. This course examines the evolution of the US criminal justice system and clarifies the period from the 18th century to modern social control. Understanding historical and historical causes of crime and justice will deepen students' understanding of modern law enforcement agencies, courts and correctional institutions. In this course we explore the potential answers to complicated and important questions about criminal activity, using social science of criminal science. Criminal study is an interdisciplinary research on law development, crime, and social response to crime. The main focus of this course is to discuss and evaluate the main explanation and theory of crime. Since criminal science is interdisciplinary, I study the theory from various academic points of view such as sociology of biology, biology, politics, psychology, economic interpretation.