Introduction In recent years, criminal science has become science, social scientists and criminologists have formed various theories and views in this regard. With the development of sociology as a new academic discipline and the definition of Conde 's sociology in August 1822, it opened the way to the development of criminal science as a new research department. The branch conducted a criminal investigation and gradually developed into the academic field of the UK in the 1950s. Cesare
There is some debate about the historical development of criminal science, but by the early 1960s I agreed that discipline that can be identified in the form of contemporary British criminology (Tierney, 2006). Nic Groombrigde (2001: 202) defines pathology as "an unhealthy deviation from the standard", ie, "individuals at genetic, hormonal or mental level". After all, this means that the crime is abnormal, that is, it is not normal. Criminologists have come up with various theories about why people commit crimes and recommend answers. Classical criminal studies believe that perpetrators are free will, reasonable and ordinary, and the positivist law shows that criminals are determined and pathologic. Whether they are sick or not
In the 20th century, two other criminal theories were developed. These theories are social structural criminology and social process criminal study. Social structural criminal studies are studying how criminal behavior is affected by structural and / or social situations. The idea behind this theory is that crime is the product of social structural flaws. Social process criminal study is the theory of how some people become criminals. The theory also considers criminal acts as learning behavior; for example, the younger brother learns how to shop from older brothers, or young gang members learn crime from experienced gang members