Current Research in Conforming to Authority
[2023-07-01 11:54:25]
This article by Rigby & Rump (1982) hopes to measure the attitude toward character characteristics related to institutional authority and authoritarianism. At South Australia Institute of Technology and Adelaide University students receive questionnaires to measure their awareness and height for teachers, police, law, military, and symbolic authority and test whether they are authoritative. In addition, students accepted character tests related to authoritarianism: "Tolerance of ambiguity, tolerance of complexity, doctrine, simplicity of cognition, creative independence, and activation of emotions" (p.
Five projects are also included to evaluate the degree to which an individual agrees with general authority. The structure of colleagues' pressure, popularity, colleague qualifications, etc. does not reflect a more general tendency but is considered to be specific to the situation of a colleague. However, there are few studies of configuration validation that evaluates different effectiveness of peer pressure and peer integration configuration and general integration of authority. General compliance projects are negatively correlated with equilibrium pressure, popularity, and comparable compliance measures, and the strength of the relationship is expected to be stronger than the peer - to - peer and comparable compliance scale strength. . Also, we expect that programs with general qualifications are in a negative relationship with many self-declared action items such as drug use, class skipping, theft, etc.
Measurement of pressure, popularity and compliance from peers between teens boys and girls: prediction of school grades, sexual attitudes and drug abuse
Performance analysis in use, sexual attitude, and school is divided into two parts: the assessment of the reliability and interrelationship of the peer pressure and consistency scale, and the scale of peer pressure and consistency and the measure of happiness and behavior It is divided into evaluation of relations between. We discussed earlier about peer-to-peer pressure, popularity, equality, and building general compliance items. For the items of all countermeasures developed for R & D, please refer to Table I and Appendix.
Measurement of pressure, popularity and compliance from peers between teens boys and girls: prediction of school grades, sexual attitudes and drug abuse
Research on group integration and obedience is a very interesting topic for me. Two important aspects of group behavior are consistency and compliance. Compliance and compliance are common to all kinds of groups, but we need to point out the difference between the two actions first. The consistency of cult organizations forces members to change their attitudes and beliefs to match with others in the group engraved by leaders.
Consistency It is the extent to which members of the group change their behavior, opinions, and attitudes to fit the group's view. The type of compliance is only compliance, only public compliance, but personally maintains its own viewpoint, the members of the group are open and private but identified. After membership period. Sociologists believe compliance is consistent, usually as a result of direct order, internalization comes from complete and complete belief in their behavior.