In the dialogue of Meno Plato Meno Plato, Socrates discussed how to use Meno to gain virtue. In the face of three possibilities, first of all, virtue is born into the human soul. The second is that you can teach virtues The third possibility is that virtue is a gift from God. Socrates and Mayo discussed these methods and reached a very broad conclusion. The problem raised by Socrates is that virtue may be born into the human soul. That is, everyone has virtue in it, but only people who can become really beautiful can have virtue. The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first, they did not understand what virtues prompted to ask if Meno should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Plato's Meno is a Socratic Dialogue where the two main speakers of Socrates and Meno (translated with Menon) discuss humanity's virtue: is it what it can be taught? The other participants in the dialogue are Meno's slave and the Socrates prosecutor Athens politician Anytus, and Meno is friendly. Meno is visiting Athens in Thessaly, and there are many companions by him. Meno is a young and beautiful and Golgius student, Gorgias is an outstanding hearing impaired, and his view on virtue clearly influences Meno. In the early days of conversation, he claimed that he raised such views repeatedly on virtue issues and in front of a large audience.

The conversation opened Meno and asked if virtue could be taught what it is. Socrates asked the general definition of Meno's virtue, as Socrates pointed out, I do not know if I can teach virtue unless I know what it is. Socrates is looking for general or formal definition of virtue, not just its examples and examples. Socrates wants to know what is common to all virtues. He wants to know the essence of virtue. Meno originally offered various virtues, but Socrates refused to use it as a complete explanation. The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first, they did not understand what virtues prompted to ask if Meno should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue.

Athens democratic politician, son of self-made man, trade turner; he was a military commander of the Piros expedition in 409 BC - he was charged with poorness [Diodorus 13. 54]. Thirty tyrants (including Plato's uncle and cousin) who helped Thraybulus regain democracy were expelled The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. So, so-called student Meno who acted as usual like Socrates and Plato's mouthpiece tried to answer the question "What is virtue?" They were initially unable to understand what inspired them to ask whether Meno should even think that answers are possible due to that virtue. The problem is how do you find things like virtues when you do not know what you are looking for? If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called the "paradox of investigation". From the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined as general moral superiority, but the problem posed by Plato 's menor is whether morals can really teach. At Plato 's Meno, Meno first asked if Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it himself. Then he asked Men to try to describe him with virtue. Meno said virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how men can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue.

Plato's argument from Meno: Virtue is a gift from God The central question in introducing this excerpt from the Plato dialogue is whether it is possible to teach virtues. For Plato, virtue is the power or harmonious soul or personality whose ownership leads to actions to ensure their good and benefits. Therefore, the natural assumption of Plato is that virtue is knowledge. The specific function is only profitable under the guidance of knowledge. For example, courage and wealth without wisdom are harmful, but it is beneficial when brave and wealthy people are wise. 1) Assume that virtue is knowledge. 2) No one was born with this knowledge. 3) Therefore, assuming that virtue is knowledge, if there is at least one good person in the world, that person will be taught virtue. 4) If someone is taught virtue, there is at least one virtue teacher. 5) There is no moral teacher. 6) Therefore, no one taught virtue. (4, 5) 7) Therefore, assume that virtue is knowledge and no one is a gentle person. (3, 6) 8) However, there are good people in the world. 9) Therefore, virtue must abandon the assumption that it is knowledge. (In other words, the hypothesis that we started was that morality is knowledge and that no one is good at it.This is obviously wrong, so abandon the hypothesis that led to this erroneous conclusion It is not knowledge, no one has been taught virtue, but when you are with gentle people, virtue should not be taught. 11) Kind people are not led by knowledge but must be led by true faith. 12) Truly ethical people must undergo regular guidance from true faith. 13) The difference between knowledge and belief is that there is a reason to believe it if there is something someone needs to know about something. 14) The only way to have true faith regularly without a justifiable reason is that she is sacred. 15) The people of God are blessed with gods. 16) Therefore good is only the reason that they are blessed with God. Why is there no virtue teacher? (1) If you want to learn flute, you go to those who insist on teaching the flute. (2) By analogy, if you want to learn virtue, you go to the people who claim to teach virtue. (3) The people who teach virtue are not good at themselves. (4) If you do not have this ability, you can not teach others the ability to reasonably manage the behavior of others. (5) Therefore, those who profess as teaching virtue do not actually teach virtues. From the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined as general moral superiority, but the problem posed by Plato 's menor is whether morals can really teach. In Plano's Meno, Meno first asked whether Socrates could teach virtue, or whether it could not be obtained, but it can be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it himself. Then he asked Men to try to describe him with virtue. Meno said virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how men can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. So, so-called student Meno who acted as usual like Socrates and Plato's mouthpiece tried to answer the question "What is virtue?" They were initially unable to understand what inspired them to ask whether Meno should even think that answers are possible due to that virtue. The problem is how do you find things like virtues when you do not know what you are looking for? If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called the "paradox of investigation". In the dialogue of Plato's "Meno", Meno came to Socrates, the question of "Can you teach virtue?" Is born. Through Plato

In Meno, Plato proved the possibility that people would discover knowledge. Know that you can motivate your brain to acquire knowledge and master more knowledge. Plato prove this process by first explaining the theory of recall by asking what something is virtue and then asking slave juveniles. There are some weaknesses in Plato's discussion, but Plato proposes an effective theory of how our idea gains knowledge. This article focuses on Plato's recall theory and examines the pros and cons of his argument with Meno. Plato's Meno is a Socratic Dialogue where the two main speakers of Socrates and Meno (translated with Menon) discuss humanity's virtue: is it what it can be taught? The other participants in the dialogue are Meno's slave and the Socrates prosecutor Athens politician Anytus, and Meno is friendly. Meno is visiting Athens in Thessaly, and there are many companions by him. Meno is a young and beautiful and Golgius student, Gorgias is an outstanding hearing impaired, and his view on virtue clearly influences Meno. In the early days of conversation, he claimed that he raised such views repeatedly on virtue issues and in front of a large audience. In Plato's Socrates dialogue "Meno" Socrates discussed whether Menor could use Professor Meno. However, when talking to Socrates, Meno was confused and seemed to stop learning too much as he did not seem to have all the arguments. Here we face someone who again thinks they know things they do not actually know. Meno said, "When you do not know what it is, how do you examine one thing, even if you have the focus of this conversation, you will soon come out of virtue. He replied to Meno saying that men can not find what they know or do not know, he does not need to find out what they already know, and there is no way to find out what I do not know. 1 Place

"Socrates, can you teach?" 1 The conversation started with asking if Mayo can teach vocals to Socrates. At the end of Meno (86 d - 100 b), Socrates tried to answer this question. This question was raised before separating opinion and knowledge, and both felt uneasy. Anytus participated in a conversation about the virtues of Socrates and Meno. Socrates claims to be able to learn if virtue is a kind of knowledge. If it is something other than a kind of knowledge, it will not be taught. The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first, they did not understand what virtues prompted to ask if Meno should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Plato's Meno offered several possible clues about hostility between Anytus and Socrates. In Meno, Plato reported that the claim of Socrates was not that the great politician could not irritate Antotus in understanding the virtue in the history of Athens. Plato quotes Anytus to warn Socrates: "Socrates, I think you are ready to tell the bad guys: and I will take care of you if you accept my advice I will advise you. "Complain. Socrates has something to do with Antutus' son. Plato says Socrates, "I have a short relationship with the son of Antutus, I think he is not missing in the spirit." Whether or not sexual behavior is included in this relationship is unknown, but like Socrates - Athens' then many men at that time - bisexuals, sleeping with some young students. Enitos almost certainly denied his son's relationship with Socrates. Any dissatisfaction added to Anytus must be Socrates' advice to his son.

The question of what knowledge, virtue, and what is the soul is the most important issue in philosophy. The soul can be defined as the ultimate essential principle of our thought, emotion, and existence. If there is life after death, the soul should exist separately from the body. Even the mysteries of birth and death, the loss of conscious life during sleep, and even the most common operations of imagination and memory, abstract from physical existence even when people are awake, all these facts It means the existence of things of. . The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first, they did not understand what virtues prompted to ask if Meno should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue.

Recalling Plato's Phaedo and Meno as the earliest philosopher of our writing, Plato is misunderstood that it is often simply replicating Socrates' rhetoric. In Meno, one of the earliest platonic daughters, Platon provided his own philosophical theory and injected his leadership talent. When discussing the process of teaching virtue, Meno advocates a difficult paradox. "How do you search for things you do not understand" (Plato, Meno, 80d). The theory of recall is explained in more detail in Plato 's Meno, and the discussion of Phaedo implicitly assumed this initial argument implicitly. However, Faedo and Meno are consistent, and the presentation of the theory in each dialogue can exist independently. Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato According to reminiscence theory, we suggest that there are some inexperienced knowledge at birth (isomorphism etc.), so that the soul exists before birth and inherits knowledge. In this case, Socrates means reminiscence (though he had understood everything before), he is not so bold at Phaedo, but another explanation of theory is in Mero of Plato. Discussion or ultimate discussion of life forms explains forms, intangible assets, and static entities that are responsible for everything in the world, and all things participate in forms. For example, beautiful things participate in the form of beauty, and the fourth participates in the form of even numbers. The soul is essentially involved in the form of life. In other words, the soul never dies. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

In Plato's Mero, Socrates claims that all learning is actually memory (80d - 86c). That he urged Socrates to make this remark and what he meant. When Socrates and Men tried to find the essence of virtue, Socrates said, "At that time the soul has been reborn and repeated many times, the world is known to everyone; she can not recall everything she knows about virtue and everything; everything So the soul learned everything, so say, because the soul knows everything already, I already know The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first we did not understand what virtue encouraged Meno to ask if we should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. In Plato's "Meno" dialogue, Meno came to Socrates The question is "Can you teach virtue?" Through Plato's question, they are asked to conclude that virtue can not be taught or born. The key channel for this argument is 86c - 96d. In this sentence, we define content, including virtue and virtue, and define what they cover. After establishing this Socrates, I tried to find a moral teacher in society. In this particular discussion, virtue is that I can not trust the idea that it can be taught.

Republic: The dynamic approach in modern moral philosophy of Protagoras, Gorgias, and Meno, which I call "New Aristotle," focuses on three areas. (1) Reject the traditional enlightenment moral theory. Kantoism and Utilitarianism; (2) Another ethical problem and project to see the thought of ancient Greece may help overcome the deadlock brought by the theory of enlightenment morals; from (3) Specifically, the moral work of Richmond in the second half of the 20th century to overcome this deadlock trying to reinterpret Asia. Sophisticated rhetoric is divided into two major schools: Protagoras and Golgias. Protagoras is a relativist who believes that morality is neither universal nor absolute, cultural or social. Gorgias emphasizes the power of nonverbal and linguistic rhetoric rather than Protagoras. Both Protagoras and Gorgias rejected the idea of ​​absolute truth. Gorgias stated that opinion is the only guideline for action. Freedom of speech is the power to form opinions. However, the symmetry of communication transactions is different. According to Gorgias, behavior is the way between the speaker and the audience. According to Protagoras, the parties will affect the results and opinion. The relationship between the speaker and the audience is not symmetrical but symmetrical Lorraine Smith Pangle reveals the core of these seemingly strange assertions, following the virtue advantage and knowledge of the five most important conversations of apology, Gorgias, Protagoras, Meno, Laws. She believes that she is more conscious of the complex causes of human behavior and the power of irrational passion, rather than a rough reading that Socrates may imply. An enthusiastic analysis of Pangle reveals that many of the teachings of Socrates have investigated factors that actually made it difficult to become a reasonable creature that he seemed to claim first. It is also important to read that Pangle emphasizes the political aspect of the dialogue. She said that much of the foundation of public opinion is a distinction between philosophy and civic morality, which is important for understanding them.

As Plato's "Meno" says, a critical argument known as Meno Paradox casts doubt on the basis of Socrates to seek ways to acquire knowledge of the unknown. If you really want to know that Socrates is not known to others, the content of that "unknown" will never produce a result. The basis of public opinion is that human beings never learn that they have not learned yet. As Meno points out, the paradox is as follows. "When you do not know what it is, what do you think about it, Socrates? Through this survey, Socrates created a theory of recollection to explain mastery of knowledge and denied Meno's paradox. Socrates did not solve the men's paradox by fully showing the recall theory. This article explores Plano's Meno paradox through Sonorites's public opinion refutation, recall theory, and evidence that Socrates presented his theory. Socrates never questioned how he could learn what was not known before. Meno's paradox shows if knowledge exists As Plato's "Meno" says, a critical argument known as Meno Paradox casts doubt on the basis of Socrates to seek ways to acquire knowledge of the unknown. If you really want to know that Socrates is not known to others, the content of that "unknown" will never produce a result. The basis of public opinion is that human beings never learn that they have not learned yet. - Article 4 of the Constitutional Amendment states that individuals have the right "to protect their eccentric appearance and seizure of personnel, houses, documents and influences", but this issue also applies to aircraft If you open fields and articles in the view and also provide insurance for the fourth fix

In Plato's Mero, Socrates intentionally uses ignorance and satire to define Meno's excellence. Initially, Meno reviewed specific definitions. This is a proof of general contradiction that is sufficient to define excellence. But Socrates argues that by comparing individuals in society with individuals in the colony the definition of excellence must be consistent and applicable to all individuals. Socrates proved that certain evidence failed to define all the components of the group. In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. In Plato's Mero, Socrates intentionally uses ignorance and satire to define Meno's excellence. Initially, Meno reviewed specific definitions. This is a proof of general contradiction that is sufficient to define excellence. But Socrates argues that by comparing individuals in society with individuals in the colony the definition of excellence must be consistent and applicable to all individuals. Socrates proved that certain evidence failed to define all the components of the group. When Socrates challenged Meno to define virtue, the first argument took place. Meno did not notice his departure point here. Meno asked earlier whether virtue is a quality that can be taught or a natural trait, and a man was born. Socrates distorted the problem in a truly shaped way and reconstructed it, watching whether Menor could answer it alone. Meno enumerates the benign qualities he considered and is the content of this simple definition. Socrates then said: From time to time Socrates pointed out in an unobtrusive way we accidentally discovered the unknown. There is a paradox here: People can search and search everything they have, but can not find it, even when another person searches for the same thing and instantly encounters it can not. If people find and discover, they may be very disappointed. Another person may find something to look for first, even if you do not mind, and vice versa.

Purchase and renting textbooks, and purchasing award-winning tablets and e-book readers such as NOOK Tablet 7 "and NOOK GlowLight, please visit BN.com. Over the years students have asked for Google, the CliffsNotes learning test preparation guide, the yellow post it notes, the SparkNotes linking literary, historical or philosophical issues, and the Wikipedia using historical reference notes It was. Their thesis. I do not have it anymore. WA is a web-based native application that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to solve most academic and real world problems. It is more time-saving and more reliable than traditional cheating trying to find a solution by Monday deadline through the weekend using natural language processing technology (what is used for Siri on your iPhone) We will provide academic shortcuts to students. problem solving SuperSummary is the newest alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, providing high quality study guides including detailed chapter summaries and main themes, character analysis, citation and thesis topics. This one-page guide includes Roald Dahl's plot summary and a brief analysis of The Landlady. Roald Dahl 's creepy short story "The Landlady" was first published in The New Yorker in November 1959. That story was later reprinted in Kiss Kiss, a collection of Dahl's short stories published by Knopf in 1960. In 1960 Dahl won his second Edgar Award in "Maid" to get the best short story novel puzzle. SuperSummary is the newest alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, providing a high quality study guide for challenging literary works. This 22 page ZZ Packer Short Story "Brownie" guide contains a detailed summary and analysis, as well as some more detailed pieces of literary analysis written by experts. Featured content includes important topics such as review of key figures, 15 important quotes, thesis topics, social classes and maturity. "Brownie" is another story of ZZ packer debut, "Coffee Coffee Elsewhere". This story took place in the 1980s at Camp Crescendo, a summer camp in southern USA. "Brownie" is explained by "runny nose" which is a member of the black brownie army who participated in the camp crescendo camp. The real name of the narrator is Laurel.

Meno is one of Plato's earliest conversations Book is deeply writing about the core problem: how can you teach virtue? If not, then whether virtue is born then, whether by nature or not. Socrates solved this problem by asking the person who claimed to understand the meaning of this term (Plano's Meruno). The purpose of this paper is to explain the influence of Socrates' method of Plato's "The Apology of Meno" on Meno's own personality. After casting doubts on Meno's virtue, Socrates concluded that he and Meno did not know the meaning of that word, then he pointed out that a thorough definition should be found. Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - convicted for life Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, whether it is injustice or evil, it is actually a matter of legal system that exists physically As long as it is a valid rule. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read. Plato's Meno is a Socratic Dialogue where the two main speakers of Socrates and Meno (translated with Menon) discuss humanity's virtue: is it what it can be taught? The other participants in the dialogue are Meno's slave and the Socrates prosecutor Athens politician Anytus, and Meno is friendly. Meno is visiting Athens in Thessaly, and there are many companions by him. Meno is a young and beautiful and Golgius student, Gorgias is an outstanding hearing impaired, and his view on virtue clearly influences Meno. In the early days of conversation, he claimed that he raised such views repeatedly on virtue issues and in front of a large audience. In Plato's Socrates dialogue "Meno" Socrates discussed whether Menor could use Professor Meno. However, when talking to Socrates, Meno was confused and seemed to stop learning too much as he did not seem to have all the arguments. Here we face someone who again thinks they know things they do not actually know. Meno said, "When you do not know what it is, how do you investigate one thing, even if you have the focus of this conversation, you immediately come out of virtue. Can Socrates teach Meno saying that the man can not find what he knows or does not know, he does not need to find out what he already knows and knows There is no way to find out that there is nothing.

JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a nonprofit organization that supports academic institutions to use digital technology to protect academic records and promote research and education in a sustainable way. © 2000-2018 ita ka. Copyright JSTOR®, JSTOR logo, JPASS®, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA. Artstor® is a registered trademark of Artstor Inc. ITHAKA is an authorized dealer of Artstor Inc. Plato 's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men' s knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato 's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men' s knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not understand something through five senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and since we saw everything here and underground, nothing was learned, so that was what it was known before I can remember You will not be surprised ... "Many Plato works Plato 's theory of recollection won a few followers of western epistemology. Socrates taught Meno to prove this, in that case the memory argument disappears. Besides, before birth, especially in the Christian era, considering that the soul was a creation doctrine from scratch from the earliest days of life, the doctrine that existed before the soul was almost universally ignored It was. Meanwhile, Plato had not considered another option, ie, the soul began to exist "preloaded", it can be said to be knowledge or at least potential knowledge. This view stands out especially in Descartes' the "innate concept" theory. Plato's "recall theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge.

The problem of circulation in the defense of Socrates is particularly problematic as it highlights the weak foundation underlying his theory as a whole. If the foundation of the theory is not perfect, there is no reason to accept what was constructed from it. If Socrates opposes Meno's paradox that knowledge is just a memory, he must prove independently of the immortality of the soul. As Socrates did not, his theory could not be considered a sufficient way to overcome public opinion. Through this survey, Socrates created a theory of recollection to explain mastery of knowledge and denied Meno's paradox. Socrates did not solve the men's paradox by fully showing the recall theory. This article explores Plano's Meno paradox through Sonorites's public opinion refutation, recall theory, and evidence that Socrates presented his theory. Socrates never questioned how he could learn what was not known before. Meno's paradox shows if knowledge exists In Meno, Meno announced a paradox about inquiries to Socrates. There is no way to explore things you do not know because you do not know how to get started, but there is no way to explore what you already know. Because you already have relevant knowledge. Therefore, we led to a contradiction that exploration is impossible. Socrates tried to elucidate Meno's paradox by suggesting his memory theory. Below I will argue that Socrates did not fully defend his memory theory. But even if we accept the theory of recollection, I also propose that this will not provide sufficient answers to Meno's public opinion. Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato In MENO, Plato shows the theory of memory between Meno and the protagonist of Socrates. By answering Meno, the soul is immortal, and the soul understands everything before it enters that soul. Now that the soul has forgotten these things, they must work hard in order to remember them. In MENO, Socrates helped slave juveniles support his idea by asking him to make simple geometric questions. The boy finally answered the question, but since he has never been to school before, knowledge comes from memory, not from learning. The thing that seems to be learning is to actually remember what they already know. The first answer of a slave boy was wrong, but Socrates insisted he did not teach a slave boy anything, and the only reason he made it for the second time is that he helped answer the answer Because it is.

To study the Plato's paradox in Meno, we can first refer to the definition of Platonism. The website defines Platonism as "a real one is a replica of transcendental thinking, it is the purpose of real knowledge and is captured by memory." And memories are "past experiences". Meno is a dialogue between Socrates, scholars and Meno, and Meno eventually became an explorer. Regardless of how it relates to other aspects of Abraham's tradition, and concerning only the issue of sexual fairness, it is contradictory that Christianity accepts Platonism. It is fair to express platonism as "metaphysics", so it seems to be somewhat synonymous with the definition of "negative theology", but it can be said that there is no religion in the world including Hinduism and its "cousin" tantra . Buddhism, Christianity is like the body that was originally visible. The truly mysterious thing is that everyone believes that Plato can be adopted, and that all Christians are something other than holy. Indeed, it was easy to laugh because the body of Christianity was initially very embarrassed. Especially when the target of ridicule was female. To study the Plato's paradox in Meno, we can first refer to the definition of Platonism. The website defines Platonism as "a real one is a replica of transcendental thinking, it is the purpose of real knowledge and is captured by memory." And memories are "past experiences". Meno is a dialogue between Socrates, scholars and Meno, and Meno eventually became an explorer. However, in this article, Meno assumes that it is an average citizen in the dialogue, rather than the average intelligence and excellent stubbornness. According to the translation of G.M.A, this work. It is thought that Grube occurred around 402 BC. In the latter part of the Greek Athenian text, Anythus, a politician who is the third character, will eventually become a plaintiff in Socrates and join the dialogue. The hard way she is speaking is clearly contradictory. Plato style women's expectations are directly against the qualities that successful men agree. Platonic prototypes are always defective. For example: You should be emotionally expressed as it is a sign of femininity (but you will be punished because you can not control yourself too emotionally). You should be warm and sensitive (but you will be considered weak, if you are weak you will be considered weak - as these are "soft" functions). Everyone wants you to be welcomed (although everyone's favorite usually means avoiding controversy, strong opinion, or opinion, and I will never oppose publicly publicly) .

"If the truth of all things is always in the soul, that soul is immortal" (Philosophy Journey 89). This shows that because the soul has the integration of all knowledge, people remember this knowledge through the context of their personal life and use their reasoning. Through the dialogue between Meno and Faedo, Plato generally discussed the memory of the soul and the idea of ​​immortality. Similarly, the Republic, through the three different circumstances shown, Plato shows the idea of ​​the shape. What is that knowledge? "Knowledge" is defined as "a rational and true belief". In order to "know" we have our own emotions, reasons, recognition and knowledge. According to Plato's knowledge theory, knowledge is available as long as there are reasonable truths and beliefs. Plato's knowledge theory and belief - continuity of knowledge is consistent. Truth is an objective requirement of knowledge. But if you believe something is the truth, it does not necessarily make you think it's real Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato Plato's "memory theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state with formal knowledge. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge. In order to understand the knowledge theory (epistemology) advocated by Plato in formal theory, there is no need to deeply study the details of Plato's ideal situation, as expected, a completely fair country is completely fairly dominated It is sufficient to show that it is a country dominated by a person. Compared to the soul, the ruler of a city state is parallel to the "spirit" (Greek: nous) in the soul. Since the eyeball is an organ that the body can see, "heart" can be thought of as the "organ" of the soul to acquire knowledge. And the perfect justice soul will be "dominated" by the soul with perfect knowledge and perfect wisdom. This "perfect" use means there is no possibility of errors or errors; even if you made a mistake, you can imagine that a better ruler is not making this mistake, so a perfect ruler must be sure I will do the right thing.

In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is important as the answer is directly related to the way we understand and position education. Plato's reason for this question is related to his wise opposition. Plato presented Socrates' view on several conversations, especially whether it is possible to teach virtue in Protagoras and Meno. In this way, Menomenon asks Socrates the following question: "Socrates - can you teach virtue, or is it otherwise achieved through practice? It is accomplished by teaching Does it essentially be obtained by people, or is it obtained in other ways? "Socrates insists that he" does not know the minimum thing about virtue "and that quality I can not say that I can argue. In addition, he insists that nobody knows this. . The next argument is whether Takayama people, Takayama's people might not be such people. Both Socrates and Menon know the teachings of Gorgius. Menon seems to have earned a higher evaluation about Gorgias teaching than Socrates. According to the Socrates' proposal it was agreed that the conversation should continue to explore Menon 's view, not Gorgia' s view on virtue. So Socrates asked Menon a question: "Do you think virtue is a hat?" Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom. Meno wants to return to the original question - whether it is possible to teach virtue - Socrates proposes two hypotheses to advance them. First, if virtue is a kind of knowledge, it can be taught; secondly, if there is something good in knowledge, then virtue is not a kind of knowledge. Socrates believes that nothing is good unless he believes that wisdom is all or part of wisdom. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman in Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the sons who apparently did not teach virtue.

Many technologies are included in today's society, and new things are discovered everyday, but questions such as "Do you teach virtue" remain unresolved? In this research Socrates tried to answer Menno's question, although the drama left a question that virtue had no answer. He is not particularly enthusiastic about answering the question whether he can teach virtue without fully understanding what virtue is but he is a matter of hypothesis that the problem is solved by investigations by geologists I try to solve. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom.

Many technologies are included in today's society, and new things are discovered everyday, but questions such as "Do you teach virtue" remain unresolved? In this research Socrates tried to answer Menno's question, although the drama left a question that virtue had no answer. He is not particularly enthusiastic about answering the question whether he can teach virtue without fully understanding what virtue is but he is a matter of hypothesis that the problem is solved by investigations by geologists I try to solve. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom.

Meno may be one of Plato 's earliest conversations, and the conversation can be reached around 402 BC. A conversation began when Meno asked Socrates to teach virtues. That question (and more fundamental question is what virtue is) is the two people who occupy the whole text. Meno introduces important and recurring Platonic themes, including forms of the Socratic Dialogue itself. Socrates tried to analyze moral terms in detail by questioning those who claim to know the meaning of that term, and finally he also concluded that "expert" did not even know the meaning of the term Did. Other important themes formed in the early days include memories (the soul is eternal, all know, learning only "memories") and virtues as a concept of wisdom. Socrates also advocated many points on the nature of the definition. Socrates and Meno define the range of potential virtues. Each virtue was proposed by Meno and destroyed by Socrates. One of the things to be asked is whether it is possible to find something that is not yet known (such as when seeking a definition of virtue), and Socrates and Meno slaves have problems with scaled models through recall theory I solve it. At the end of the conversation participants (including Anytus who played a secondary role at last) have reached the classic Socratic state - they do not yet know what virtue is yet, but at least they now know I know that there is nothing. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficiently long time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one meaning "the speaker is heading to the store") The summary is understood to be smaller than the original sentence, and the same words may be used . Most commonly, when we provide a summary, we are taking the "point" of the work. We have to decide what is important and what can happen. This is the version of the TV "Clean House" program. What will we protect and throw what? Then we will organize what we keep as it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the article). They usually point out the point. Please read the last few paragraphs (20% from the last 10% of the article). They usually summarize the points

In this article, I will study the basic characteristics and attributes of Plato 's "memories" at Meno. In my opinion, Plato uses "memory" to counter this argument. "People do not know whether they know or discovery is unnecessary," he said. That's "forgetting". Therefore, when you are discovering what people are learning, they just remember what they had forgotten. Generally speaking, when people learn, they achieve an understanding by learning what they think they do not know. Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato Plato's "memory theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge. Plato has memories to explain our access to in-coming knowledge, not from experience. The reminiscence theory constitutes the spiritual aspect of memory, as it means that memory is like a soul, maintained, never dying. Everything a person has already exists and people need to motivate themselves to bring it. Knowledge can not be gained from experience, it is in our hearts, our souls. Plato 's recall theory is a bit different from the sacred Christian' s view of recall theory. In many ways, the idea of ​​Plato 's memories is completely contradictory.

In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is important as the answer is directly related to the way we understand and position education. Plato's reason for this question is related to his wise opposition. Plato presented Socrates' view on several conversations, especially whether it is possible to teach virtue in Protagoras and Meno. In this way, Menomenon asks Socrates the following question: "Socrates - can you teach virtue, or is it otherwise achieved through practice? It is accomplished by teaching Does it essentially be obtained by people, or is it obtained in other ways? "Socrates insists that he" does not know the minimum thing about virtue "and that quality I can not say that I can argue. In addition, he insists that nobody knows this. . The next argument is whether Takayama people, Takayama's people might not be such people. Both Socrates and Menon know the teachings of Gorgius. Menon seems to have earned a higher evaluation about Gorgias teaching than Socrates. According to the Socrates' proposal it was agreed that the conversation should continue to explore Menon 's view, not Gorgia' s view on virtue. So Socrates asked Menon a question: "Do you think virtue is a hat?" Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom. Meno wants to return to the original question - whether it is possible to teach virtue - Socrates proposes two hypotheses to advance them. First, if virtue is a kind of knowledge, it can be taught; secondly, if there is something good in knowledge, then virtue is not a kind of knowledge. Socrates believes that nothing is good unless he believes that wisdom is all or part of wisdom. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman in Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the sons who apparently did not teach virtue.

Book 1 of the Plato Republic proposes what justice is. Four views of justice have been reconsidered. The first is that justice tells the truth and pay off people's debts. Second, justice will help a man 's friends and hurt the enemy. The third view of justice is the advantage of strong. The last opinion is that injustice is more profitable than justice. The book first explained that many Athenians were celebrating the introduction of the new goddess in the city of Piraeus. About this book This book contains three Plato dialogues: Euthyphro, Meno, Republic, Book 1. Translation is done by Belle Waring. If you are not familiar with Plato, you may be confused with the numbers and letter combinations - 6b, 71c etc. seen in the margin of the conversation's sidebar. These are so-called Stephanas page numbers. In 1578, Henricus Stephanus announced the complete Plato. It was the basis of a standardized reference system. Like the comment section in this book, written by John Holbo, you can refer to different versions and translated paragraphs through the Stephanus page. Speaking of comments: There are more books about Platon than you read in your life. To make matters worse, many people are good. For the authors of the review, this is a challenge. People need to tell new things new things new ways. This book is suitable for beginners, but I hope that students who have improved further can get something from them. The chapters are short and sweet, but they are getting longer These "early", "intermediate", "slow" tags have at least some meaning. The first conversation Euthyphro was quick. Meno is in the middle of the middle. Third, the Republic is an intermediary. However, the first volume may have been written before. Like Meno, it is called Early Medium. Did I answer my question: How do you read this book? Maybe I said someone who meets you, this is not the same. I did not even have easy-to-understand answers. Fortunately, I will put another crack on this case in Chapter 4. At the same time, in the next two chapters, will you pursue the key people we work on? The problem is deeper. Who is Socrates? Who is Plato? What did they say? What do they mean by saying this? What do they think?

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Greece, Aleete: It means that virtue or "knowledge is virtue" is more subjective. Allete is one of the fundamental principles of ancient Greek thought and has brought the definition of social ethics model and exercise principle, but it is still supported at present sports competition. If you imagine a virtue in the form of a mind, we do not overwhelm the essence of the Bible, but I think that you must first define the code in simple words. I will define virtue as "the possibility of consideration, the essence of worthy intent and purpose". This is simply an overly simplified concept, emphasizing that it is a kind of a potential substance, but a kind of meaning. Examples include heroism, perseverance, charity, perseverance, or behaviors to respect or respect. In a nutshell, power and matter are good. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. SOC Meno, why will I try to tell you. I will not withdraw the claim that virtue can teach it if it is knowledge; however, I am worried that there may be reasons to doubt whether virtue is knowledge. And should virtues be teachers and disciples saying that not only virtue but also any teaching? SOC Of course, I often ask if there is something, it is difficult to find them, they have never been successful; many people will help me find me. The moment he thought that he wanted, we were lucky to be able to sit at our Anytus who are the people to ask them. Socrates claims that virtue is knowledge. He thinks the two terms are the same (Reshotko, 2006). Virtue is knowledge, knowledge is virtue. There are two ways that Socrates helps to understand that believing knowledge is virtue. These are related to understanding what is good, how they benefit people, what is wrong, and how they harm people. People's default view is always to choose people who think they can give them superiority and think they will not hurt at all. Therefore, it is not mere knowledge but the benefit of knowledge. Therefore, knowledge is necessary for a person to live with virtue.

Plato's knowledge theory Plato's knowledge theory is very interesting. He expressed this theory in three ways: his parable of "cave", his metaphor of division line, and his "form" of doctrine. Since all theories are related to each other, we can not have any other theory. Here we explore how we relate to others. Plato explains the vision of a prisoner with a squat in a dark cave facing the wall in the "cave". They are also tied to the neck, and the prisoners can only see the shadows by looking ahead. These shadows are in the form of people and things in front of the fire behind the prisoner. What is that knowledge? "Knowledge" is defined as "a rational and true belief". In order to "know" we have our own emotions, reasons, recognition and knowledge. According to Plato's knowledge theory, knowledge is available as long as there are reasonable truths and beliefs. Plato's knowledge theory and belief - continuity of knowledge is consistent. Truth is an objective requirement of knowledge. But if you believe something is the truth, it does not necessarily make you think it's real Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato Plato's "memory theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state with formal knowledge. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge.

Plato's theory of human knowledge Plato considers all true knowledge to be memories. He said that we all have natural knowledge and tell us what we have experienced in the world. Plato believes that this knowledge can be obtained when the soul lives in the invisible area, the area of ​​shape and goodness. Plato's "morphology" theory thinks that everything in nature represents the ideal of this form. For example, the table represents an ideal format. Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato Plato's "memory theory" can be traced back to the idea detailed by him in the "Meno" dialogue. Essentially, Plato believes that our soul has an existing state with formal knowledge. But in the current situation, it loses this knowledge, and all learning refers to the process of remembering this knowledge. Plato's assertion that epistemology or knowledge theory is one of the most important themes in philosophy and "knowledge is just true belief" has brought about little future development in this field. Plato's idea is that thought is never considered deterministic as opinion is emanating from the world of effervescence of sensory perception, true knowledge comes from the eternal form of the world is. Based on formal theory, Plato believes that true knowledge exists essentially within his soul and is enveloped in their perception of reality. In his "controversial" memory theory, Plato pointed out that the soul once existed in reality, it had all knowledge, but once it occupied the human body, that forgot it . Therefore, Plato stated that a new form of "learning" is simply a memory of what we knew before.

Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. The Socrates investigation method questioned his beliefs on their beliefs and often led them to a state of confusion or Plato called "melancholy". Meno has examples of many Socratic techniques, also written by Plato. The apology was written by Plato 's Socrates trial, and at the age of seventy - seven, Socrates was condemned to have defeated the young Athenian people. Plato's story includes three speech Socrates made during the trial. Socrates talked with the Athenians before his jury in 399 BC and acknowledged that he had forgotten who he was himself. The trial began with the prosecutor sued the accused in front of the jury of Athens. In this trial, Meretas believed that Socrates committed a crime committed by the youth of Athens and made rude. Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand his quest and the Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. Approach to the quest of Socrates caused the audience to question their beliefs and often led to the state of confusion or the state of Plato called "depression". Meno has many examples of Socratic method written by Plato. . Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

The relationship between virtue and knowledge is central to the views of Socrates' human excellence, but it also points out the central problem of platonic dialogue. Socrates can believe that human excellence is virtue. Because that is the result of ignorance, is not the punishment the correct response to crime education? Or are these arguments merely a rhetorical device of a notoriously complicated philosopher? The claims of Lorraine, Smith, and Pangle in the five most important conversations - apology, golgia, protagoras, meno and laws follow the virtues of superiority and knowledge power, and the truth of these seemingly strange claims I will clarify. She believes that she is more conscious of the complex causes of human behavior and the power of irrational passion, rather than a rough reading that Socrates may read implicitly. A sharp analysis by Pangle shows that many of the teachings of Socrates are actually exploring the factors that human beings make difficult to become a reasonable creature that he believes originally claimed. It is also important to read that Pangle emphasizes the political aspect of the dialogue. She stated that the basis of many public opinion is the distinction between philosophy and citizen's morality and is extremely important in understanding it. After all, Pangle provides a fundamentally unimpeant way to read the views on Socrates human excellence. Virtue is not knowledge in an ordinary meaning, but real virtue is nothing but wisdom. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. SOC Meno, why will I try to tell you. I will not withdraw the claim that virtue can teach it if it is knowledge; however, I am worried that there may be reasons to doubt whether virtue is knowledge. And should virtues be teachers and disciples saying that not only virtue but also any teaching? SOC Of course, I often ask if there is something, it is difficult to find them, they have never been successful; many people will help me find me. The moment he thought that he wanted, we were lucky to be able to sit at our Anytus who are the people to ask them. Socrates claims that virtue is knowledge. He thinks the two terms are the same (Reshotko, 2006). Virtue is knowledge, knowledge is virtue. There are two ways that Socrates helps to understand that believing knowledge is virtue. These are related to understanding what is good, how they benefit people, what is wrong, and how they harm people. People's default view is always to choose people who think they can give them superiority and think they will not hurt at all. Therefore, it is not mere knowledge but the benefit of knowledge. Therefore, knowledge is necessary for a person to live with virtue. There are several different special virtue lists. Socrates believes that virtue is knowledge. It shows that there is only one virtue. Stoic Sc ​​hool unanimously agreed that the four major virtues are only part of true virtue. John McDowell is a defender of this concept these days. He says that virtue is "perceived ability" to determine how a person should behave and that all particular virtues are simply "occupational sensitivity due to a series of actions" believe. He separates the virtues related to emotions and desires from virtues related to the mind. Each moral virtue is the average between the corresponding two vices (see the meaning of gold), one being a remainder and the other representing legitimacy. Bad

The core family of mothers, fathers, and children is very familiar to our society. We regard these relationships as ideal and form our lives around those relationships. In the Republic, Plato proposes to abolish the family and replace it with a guardian. This can be one of the most controversial views of Plato; it includes a positive element, but is considered unrealistic by many people. The theoretical basis behind Plato's idea is made up of many different parts, all of them focusing on the main goal of unification. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. From Gorgias to Republic, you can observe the development of Plato's two world theories. Prato reached his best system in the Republic. Using his previous work to explain the various aspects of building a theory as a precursor to its official introduction. Forms play a major role in his theory, but this role needs to be further developed. After all, "super form" becomes a sustainable and creative force behind all reality, shape forms and sustains self-sustained good forms, visible world objectives, and ultimately to human beings It is maintained in a world that can be understood by providing real world understanding. It is a chance. There is no shape in either Meno or Golgias, but Meno knows that true knowledge comes from other worlds, and Gorgias has pure justice.

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Aristotle presented options to Plato's claim that learning is memory. Where can Aristotle find errors in Plato's claim in "faedo"? In his conversation, Faedo and Meno, Plato proposed that all learning is memory, through the form of Socrates. In Faedo, to prove that the soul is immortal, Socrates claims that all learning is memory, and only reminds the fact that the immortal soul knows. In Meno, Socrates tried to demonstrate the credibility of this belief by making complex geometry with nearby slave boys. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Plato and Aristotle's Philosophical Thinking and Contribution to the Development of Western Philosophy Plato is a classical Greek philosopher and one of the five contributors to Western philosophy, his leader, Socrates and Aristotle I am an educator after the teacher. - Aristotle presented a useful persuasion principle. The most common in the media are these principles, spirit, morality, and identity. When used in the media, Aristotle's two principals became more convenient and one was late. Spirit is a person who is retreating, not attracting all kinds of public. In the media, there are sadness, emotional complaints, and signs, but logical appeal is most effective. One of the more effective things is sorrow of charm.

Ignorance is not an excuse We choose only what I think is good and if someone chooses evil it must be ignorant. Plato believes that we always choose, except when we are ignorant. Plato insists that ignorance is the only excuse for picking evil. His opinion on Meno is obvious. When I read whether we intentionally chose evil, I noticed that there are many aspects and many ways to answer this question. My opinion is not as clear as I thought. In this article, I will introduce many work on this topic such as Meno. "Ignoring the law can be an excuse for everyone, not everyone knows the law, but" This is an excuse for everyone to appeal, say how to condemn him to everyone Topic: Cicero Self-Defense Quoted from Steven P. Hallbrook in 43 BC, "Everyone is armed with: Evolution of constitutional rights", in 1984 with the publication office of New Mexico University Press It was published by independent laboratory. It is not essentially written in our minds; laws come to us through derivation, absorption and recruitment from the essence itself, not through training, customs and reading; law, we are from theory Rather than teaching from practice through natural intuition, rather than teaching our lives through collusion, violence, robbery and enemies, the law of any protection method is the same I mean it. of But as the words say, "Ignorance is not an excuse." Likewise, ignorance of facts is not an excuse. For example, if a traditional backstreet counterfeiter is incompetent and not aware of depriving ordinary people, does this mean that he has not committed a camouflage? of course not! There are no clear reasons why interest rates can not be adapted to a certain level of free market GDP maximization in the "basic money only" system (sometimes called "all reserve banks" or "100% reserve banks"). (The usual assumption in economics is that when commodities are sold at free market prices, GDP is maximized, unless there are significant social factors that can be proved, such as child education, .

Uncontrolled Statue: Platonic Lesson on Analog Margin Summary: The difference between Plato's best-known knowledge and perspective is in Meno. This distinction will depend on the analogy between acquiring and maintaining knowledge and acquiring and retaining precious supplies. Plato, however, saw the limits of its similarity and patiently warned against receiving the wrong lesson. In this article we will revisit this familiar analogy again to understand how Plato is used. Great Platonic Dialogue, Faedo, Socrates compare the Greek civilization around the Aegean Sea to a pond filled with ants and frogs. Later, Aristotle, one of Plato's students, proved how appropriate this analogy is for developing the Animal Behavior Classification Act, named social insects as ants, and added food from the perspective of relative complexity Co-produced and shared. Second only to humans. It is the development of this society to prosper their political and social evolutionary society * Uncontrolled Statue: Platonic Lesson on Analog Margin Summary: The difference between Plato's best-known knowledge and perspective is in Meno. This distinction will depend on the analogy between acquiring and maintaining knowledge and acquiring and retaining precious supplies. Plato, however, saw the limits of its similarity and patiently warned against receiving the wrong lesson. - In this study, three piperine analogs of dipeptidyl boronic acid (1-3) were synthesized. The structure of the synthesized compound was characterized by spectral studies. Antitumor activity of all compounds against 3 cancer cell lines and antibacterial activity against 7 bacterial species and 5 fungal species were screened. Since 2015, Icosaix 's mass production enabled us to use five Plato solids (front cut, one third cut per side, even with rotary tip) similar to the Rubik cube. In addition to the Rubik cube, tetrahedra can be used as pyramins, octahedrons for rotating octahedrons, dodecahedrons for megamins, and icosaices for icosa. The composition of the puzzle is similar to Rubik's cube or it is based on its internal operation. For example, a cube is a Rubik's cube-based puzzle, but it has various functional sizes such as 2 x 2 x 4, 2 x 3 x 4, 3 x 3 x 5. Many cubes are based on a 4 × 4 × 4 or 5 × 5 × 5 mechanism and penetrate the plastic for construction or directly modify the mechanism itself.

Plato's View of Human Knowledge Plato shows three different perspectives on Meno, the Republic, and Teatetus' knowledge. In the case of Meno, Plato believes that knowledge was born at our birth, in his later view in the Republic he believes that Plato perceives things and gains knowledge, from the last point of view Plato believes knowledge is a reality And a reasonable combination of ideas. Strangely, Plato's views in men, republics, and Theatetus are similar to the features of knowledge. As far as methodology is concerned, Plato explains that it is a methodist in his knowledge processing. Plato also considers knowledge as a human objective attribute. One of the most important features of Plato's philosophy, what he seems to have superseded from Socrates is that when we make something to an individual (eg knowledge), an individual has some universal character Because I believe it belongs to. Therefore, it is said that an individual knows a specific situation because it meets the conditions necessary for knowledge in a particular situation or situation. For Plato who challenges the viewpoint of materialism, humans have two kinds of knowledge. One is derived from their emotions, and this knowledge is our view. You may see one or one aspect in one story, but others may see different ways. Therefore, opinions can not express real knowledge. Individuals can learn the truth from immortal thoughts, and as you remember, these ideas exist before these individual concepts. The soul acquires universal and real knowledge through recollections: they remember the experience they gained while traveling through the immortal world of thinking. Plato's perception of the existence of pre-experience knowledge had a great impact on many psychologists, including our contemporaries. Humans seem to have unlimited intellectual ability, and if the soul is not more active than the body it will be meaningless. Although there is no clear information source here, this idea is based on the general view of Plato 's essence of divinity and reasonable and moral ability, and the neo - Platonic way of view that each human soul contains It is implicit in. Copy of all forms One of the reasons Socrates confidence in him usually warned him if he was in danger and did not object to his participation in his trial It is a habitual sign or demon. Socrates is fully expecting the death penalty, which sufficiently proves that his executions do not cause harm. As long as Socrates believes in his logo, Socrates is the source of trust, which constitutes evidence of immortality of the soul.

The virtue of historical and literary virtue systems is considered to be one of the most important qualities of humanity. By definition, virtue is a form of good and justice, a sense of moral excellence. It involves depicting actions that indicate a high level of ethical standards. The literary virtue system in society has made great progress. Different cultures have created different perspectives and perspectives when trying to understand the virtue system through the history of mankind. Literary virtues are inherited from generation to generation through various means or other means (such as formal sentences) related to literary works. Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961) occupies an important position in the history of American literature with his revolutionary role at the stage of the American novel of the 20th century. Hemingway depicts disillusionment of the reality of the war during war and dividing the old values. His work is a symbolic interpretation of life in a simple yet non-traditional style, with the theme of war, violence and death. The virtue of historical and literary virtue systems is considered to be one of the most important qualities of humanity. By definition, virtue is a form of good and justice, a sense of moral excellence. It involves depicting actions that indicate a high level of ethical standards. The literary virtue system in society has made great progress. Different cultures have created different perspectives and perspectives when trying to understand the virtue system through the history of mankind. - In this article, I will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education.

The virtue of historical and literary virtue systems is considered to be one of the most important qualities of humanity. By definition, virtue is a form of good and justice, a sense of moral excellence. It involves depicting actions that indicate a high level of ethical standards. The literary virtue system in society has made great progress. Different cultures have created different perspectives and perspectives when trying to understand the virtue system through the history of mankind. Literary virtues are inherited from generation to generation through various means or other means (such as formal sentences) related to literary works. Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961) occupies an important position in the history of American literature with his revolutionary role at the stage of the American novel of the 20th century. Hemingway depicts disillusionment of the reality of the war during war and dividing the old values. His work is a symbolic interpretation of life in a simple yet non-traditional style, with the theme of war, violence and death. The virtue of historical and literary virtue systems is considered to be one of the most important qualities of humanity. By definition, virtue is a form of good and justice, a sense of moral excellence. It involves depicting actions that indicate a high level of ethical standards. The literary virtue system in society has made great progress. Different cultures have created different perspectives and perspectives when trying to understand the virtue system through the history of mankind. - In this article, I will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education.

Through Men's dialogue, Socrates asked what virtue is, virtue was born, acquired by learning, or obtained as a gift from God (Jowett, 1949). After discussion with Meno, Socrates first offered a theory of virtue and birth. Afterwards, knowledge of congenital virtues has prior knowledge, which in turn depends on a priori reason (Russell, 2011). Prior knowledge depends on prior knowledge. The transcendental argument is an epistemological argument that it is not related to experience in a sense. The subject of moral quality is more widely part of the theory of virtue, which is a philosophical examination of the concepts related to virtue. Roger Crisp distinguished virtue ethics and virtue theory as follows: "Virtue theory is a field of quest for general virtue; virtue ethics is narrow and normative, mainly including virtue advocacy" (Crisp 1998, 5). Since the former is trying to build the foundation of ethics based on the evaluation of virtue, virtue ethics is a subspecies of the virtue theory. Morality (or morality from Greek (arete) /ˌærəteɪ.ɪk) is a normative ethical theory that emphasizes the virtues of thought and personality. Virtue ethicists discuss the nature and definition of virtues, and other related issues. For example, how can virtue be obtained? How are they applied to various real environments? Is virtue the universal source of humanity or multiculturalism? Virtues such as honesty and generosity not only tend to be honest and generous, but also to be designated as "ideal" or "morally valuable" personality is not useful. It certainly is a personality deeply rooted in its owner - but the problem, as it is a problem, as we said "always go down", unlike customs like character character drinking tea - The orbital trend is not a few honest behaviors, it is multitrack to take honest action for some reason.

Through Men's dialogue, Socrates asked what virtue is, virtue was born, acquired by learning, or obtained as a gift from God (Jowett, 1949). After discussion with Meno, Socrates first offered a theory of virtue and birth. Afterwards, knowledge of congenital virtues has prior knowledge, which in turn depends on a priori reason (Russell, 2011). Prior knowledge depends on prior knowledge. The transcendental argument is an epistemological argument that it is not related to experience in a sense. The subject of moral quality is more widely part of the theory of virtue, which is a philosophical examination of the concepts related to virtue. Roger Crisp distinguished virtue ethics and virtue theory as follows: "Virtue theory is a field of quest for general virtue; virtue ethics is narrow and normative, mainly including virtue advocacy" (Crisp 1998, 5). Since the former is trying to build the foundation of ethics based on the evaluation of virtue, virtue ethics is a subspecies of the virtue theory. Morality (or morality from Greek (arete) /ˌærəteɪ.ɪk) is a normative ethical theory that emphasizes the virtues of thought and personality. Virtue ethicists discuss the nature and definition of virtues, and other related issues. For example, how can virtue be obtained? How are they applied to various real environments? Is virtue the universal source of humanity or multiculturalism? Virtues such as honesty and generosity not only tend to be honest and generous, but also to be designated as "ideal" or "morally valuable" personality is not useful. It certainly is a personality deeply rooted in its owner - but the problem, as it is a problem, as we said "always go down", unlike customs like character character drinking tea - The orbital trend is not a few honest behaviors, it is multitrack to take honest action for some reason.

The Greeks began to doubt their creations and their sacred relationship. Many philosophers have different beliefs about relationships between the body, the soul, and sanctity. Plato first asked about the existence of the soul and concluded that the soul and body are complementary but completely different from each other. The soul is a connected body and sacred organ. The body is a tool of perception of the soul. A body without a soul is just a body. Believing the independent soul and body is very popular in ancient Greece and taught by one of the most famous philosophers: "Immortality of the soul is the major doctrine of the Greek philosopher Plato ... Plato The thought of the soul is self movement and indivisibility ... it exists before the body in which it lives, and it will survive "(Fog, p. 32). When and how do you bring the concept of immortality of the soul into the Christian world? The Old Testament did not teach it. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia explains as follows. "We are affected by Greece, Platonic's idea is more or less, the body is dead, but the soul is immortal" (1960, Vol.2, p. 812, "Death") can not be found It was There is no doubt that it is one of the most famous concepts developed by Plato. If you do not know what it is, let me explain. Plato believes in the eternal life of the soul, both in life and after death. Our soul is immortal. Eternity, perennial, never dying. This is the reason Plato insisted on the importance of fair life. "Very" I mean morally acceptable and rational life. Life based on justice, kindness, and wisdom. The idea of ​​judging our behavior is very interesting. Plato, we should not be lovers such as honor, profit, injustice, appearance, reputation. At first glance they may look attractive. In fact, we are living a wealthy and glorious life. I have money and a good reputation so I can get all the things I want. But our soul will be defiled. These temptations show us the wrong way to a morally acceptable life. At the end of the day, we will judge according to our actions. Plato said that the soul is immortal. In various dialogues, especially the faedo, Plato explains the relationship between philosophy and soul, philosophical activities prepare for the good death of the soul and the world after death. In this conversation, Plato presented several arguments to support the assertion of the immortality of the soul, one of which returned to the memory theory dictated by Meno. The other argument concerns the concept that there are two kinds of existence, one related to perishable substances such as human body, and one related to things that are not decayed such as the soul.

Introduction In this article I will explain Plato's view of reality and criticize it. I think there is a problem because Plato's argument has become a victim of many errors, and of course the most famous is the matter of a third party. First, I will explain the problems in Plato's theory. Finally, we recommend replacing Plato's theory. This question is very important as the real problem has plagued philosophy from the beginning, and many people think that this question never was satisfied satisfactory. The writing part of the Republic of Zeno is criticism of Plato's work (same name). Plato believes that most people need guidance from the lonely "philosopher king" (a person who seems to be suspicious of his author), but the Zeno Republic is conceiving a more equitable city I will. For example, he advocated a fundamental claim that citizenship should be closer in relationship than parentage (even if Engels did not do this in "families, private property and state origin"), . There are no courts, currency-using cities. Xen believes that men and women should wear the same ordinary clothes, and considering the relationship between clothes and status in the ancient world, Xeno's position emphasizes the weakening of hierarchical systems of class and sex It is that. Introduction In this article I will explain Plato's view of reality and criticize it. I think there is a problem because Plato's argument has become a victim of many errors, and of course the most famous is the matter of a third party. First, I will explain the problems in Plato's theory. Finally, we recommend replacing Plato's theory. - "If the truth of everything is always in the soul, that soul is immortal" (The Philosophical Journey 89). This shows that because the soul has the integration of all knowledge, people remember this knowledge through the context of their personal life and use their reasoning. Through the dialogue between Meno and Faedo, Plato discusses the general soul memory and the concept of immortality. Bloom is a student of Plato and his criticism of student music reflects the views of philosophers and later Nietzsche. Plato thinks that music has important educational functions. Regarding Plato, the soul is essentially divided into three parts. There is a reasonable part, spirit, appetite. What is wanted is to integrate these parts reasonably and conveniently. Music can do a lot to stimulate this harmony. Melodious music helps create a melodious soul. For Plato, martial arts music is necessary: ​​warriors have to be urged. It is not necessary to send souls to ecstasy music, deprive rationality to appetite, and make men and women be beasts.

"I think that speaking the truth is better than lying, I think that being free is better than being a slave, I believe in knowing better than knowing." HL Mencken Perhaps this is true: the opposite of knowledge is ignorance. No one would object to saying that ignorance is not a good thing. I love knowledge more than ignorance and I do not want to be disadvantaged to ignorant people, so I am trying to educate myself about important things to me. For example, those who try to humiliate you by making a false, overly simple claim about what the Bible says. If you know better than they know, you do not need to listen or respond. You can change the theme with a smile! But for this article, I would like to wear my reverse hat to emphasize the shortcomings of knowledge. The same quality that makes knowledge virtue may turn it into a bad habit. Knowledge form Knowledge notification It makes frames, labels, categories and shots that we can see the world. It functions as a haze, Instagram filter, and a poetic structure of our lives (think of the rules of Haiku and 5-7-5). But, be careful, these filters distort our vision. The thing we know is what we are going to do next, so the structure of knowledge generation may limit us. We started running with the same data bit, excessive sound, and autopilot without doubting our assumption. As Frank Lloyd Wright said, experts are "people who stopped thinking because he knows." In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. Plato provided his explanation for two different works, Protagora and the Republic of Virtue. Through Socrates in Protagoras Plato, I believe that virtue is knowledge. The premise of discussion is that everyone wants what they think is good. From this, we need to do it when a person does bad things or do bad things, we know that it is bad, we have to do it. To distinguish between good and bad people is not a wish for good things. Therefore, the concept of human virtue of Plato comes down to understanding good and choosing the most profitable behavior correctly.

Hobbes is not Meno citizenship hero's reflection, Plato (Plato 60) asked, "what is in itself". Such dialogue of virtues between Socrates and Menon skillfully constitutes a broader dialogue between the moral Hobbes tradition of Greek heroes and the sophistry of Athens of the 5th century. "Cloud" in three categories of moral actors to respond to Hobbes Leviathan and Aristo survey Plato: Hobbes' moral journey, moral traditionism of the hero, moral opportunistic sophistry. In his first great novel (1897), "Narcissus Negro", a nonreflective and heroic singleton saved a brave painful brave container and its crew and then fell tired sleep. When he woke up, "I never thought of escaping my death," the old man said he needed to take all the existing burden of devastating time soon and told him It reached, it was almost too heavy. strength. Old! He shook his head, raising his arms, I felt limbs. When it gets older ...? When he awakens to persistent power and seeing the immortal sea, in a review of the eternal planet, he calls him full of confusion, not seeing the black, its change, and the foam, Listening to one type of impatience, confusion and ruthless ruthlessness Because there is no lack of antireflection, like the main character, there is a lack of a real inhuman world, and because it provides arbitrary support for whether it is independent of human's worthless human world, It is listed as a specific lack or lack. Marlow declares that he wants to believe that we are in the world and the real world, that is, as a way to distinguish Arthur Schopenhauer, a philosopher famous for "the world as representative and" the world is will " What is it about to understand? What is it?) Under the influence of Shopenhauer's pessimism, Young Conrad, as a matter of course, a "cruel and vast" sensation is generated out of this distinction Singleton's "greed" can tell such Mahlow As contrasting the differences is increasingly threatened. "Surface - Facts" and some "inner truth"

According to Plato, the soul of Aristotle and Augustine can be defined as an eternal mystery that people can never understand. However, many people accepted the challenge of effectively interpreting the content of the soul, and outlined their desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle and Augustine. All three have their own perspective, but the similarity between the views is very sharp. The soul is indeed a mystery of humanity, and the only reasonable explanation for its existence has not arrived yet, and may never come. Both Aristotle and Saint Augustine were influenced by Plato. The philosophy of their morality, politics, and purpose of life is under the influence of Platonicity. St. Augustine is the true heir of Plato, as it took Plato's ideal country and revealed the influence of the life of citizens of the earth in the city of God. The state of Plato is an ideal state which does not actually function. - In this philosophical scientific research paper I will proceed as follows. First, I will explain the pros and cons of creation and evolution. Next, according to Saint Augustine and Charles Darwin, we will analyze the philosophical scientific reasons for this problem. Finally, I guess my results and give scientific advice. Many people have asked this question. Where are you from. Please create the universe based on creationist, or higher powers of "God" According to Plato, the soul of Aristotle and Augustine can be defined as an eternal mystery that people can never understand. However, many people accepted the challenge of effectively interpreting the content of the soul, and outlined their desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle and Augustine. All three have their own perspective, but the similarity between the views is very sharp. - The origin of sin to the world is a theological topic, and many theologians have expressed their views and thoughts. Of course, theologians are interested in leading believers to understand how sin enters the world. This will help the believer make a prudent and wise decision that can not lead to a wrong direction leading to a crime. Plato (Platonicism) - Plato's philosophy and other conversations in Meno have influenced Augustine's memory concept. Plato believes learning is memory, and the soul rediscovers the truth it knows before it is born. Augustine insisted on philosophy as the pursuit of the most noble life from Xcelo, which was deeply influenced by the same allegations of the plateau. According to Plato's rejection, Augustine also declared how the soul was related to the body at the time of birth or before birth.

"Reading and writing skills in various subjects is very important for the choice of life in the future. What we need to learn that children deal with various kinds of texts is very unique education and dialogue at school is". He is a professor of educational science at the university 's new Blåsenhus campus and is in charge of research on reading and writing processes. Learning to read and write is not a matter of simply "cracking code". It's about being able to use it to read and write many topics and backgrounds "Even at a very young age it will lay the foundation for children's understanding and future participation.When adults enter texts with children, explain the contents in detail and explain," Caroline Liberg I say. From an international perspective, Swedish families do a very good job of providing young children with an exciting family environment to develop handwritten languages. In the next step, children learn to read, write and understand the abstract principles of written letters. This is the focus of today's school. "But as children acquire the basic skills of reading and writing new challenges arise, children will encounter lots of text, if not early, between 3rd and 4th graders. Because the information in the text is very dense, this might be a big shock, "Caroline Liberg said. Students usually deal with themselves at this stage and face many sentences without the teacher's true support. Since the 1980s, the trend in education was to allow children to manage themselves. "But dialogue and dialogue with others is very important to learning, there are different opinions depending on the content.The contrast effect is the foundation of all learning.The topic text also has different difficulties.For example, The text is well explained sex, other textbooks may be narrative, debate, etc, but students need to learn to meet all these textbooks in terms expressed in the learning requirements of each subject there is." "At Uppsala University, we received funds to set up research laboratories to study texts in mathematics and science fields, and finance on how students handle these texts.Caroline Liberg Maintenance COWEN: But does Plato like Socrates, too? As you read these conversations, Socrates seems to be full of public opinion. I tend to use Protagoras and Sophists more. You read a conversation like Meno. "Oh, learning has to be remembered." The argument you carefully learned about this conclusion seems stupid. COWEN: This is a philosopher's dislikes. But for our readers, what would it be like if I wanted to read all the conversations that you think would have and blame it for the bottom line of the bottom line? That is not the law, but the law of Socrates. What do you think? It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we met in an English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents a thing (theme), but it is also a concept or image symbol (frame) in the speaker's mind. A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain.

Knowledge chemistry Hippeas think he has all the answers. "I did not think that everyone was my advantage in all respects," he boasted. Then he met Socrates. He announced thousands of general speech about virtue, but the conversation with the most intelligent Athenians made him acknowledge that "he can not say even what is a virtue" (Hippeas 70). Small Hippeas crushed Hippeas, but provided more than just a negative definition of knowledge. Meno, Phaedo, and the Republic have a more comprehensive discussion of the definition, benefits, and teaching of knowledge. Chemistry introductory: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of concepts: Discuss scientific method; determine the number of significant figures; perform temperature conversion; enumerate laboratory safety measures; distinction: substance / mixture, homogeneity / Heterogeneous system, physical / chemical change, exotherm / endothermic reaction and heat / temperature. Symbols, equations, and equations: Demonstrate knowledge, understanding and application of concepts: Writing chemical symbols; Balancing chemical equations; Converting oral statements into chemical equations; using molar concepts for molar mass , Mass mass calculation, formula of a specific material In this case the problem of weight / mole number including molar mass / percent composition is solved. Chemistry also uses several complementary areas such as technology and mathematics to perform its function. For example, a combination of chemistry and technology improves the quality of life by expanding understanding and acquisition of various physical and biological resources. Chemistry is often called central science because chemistry combines practice and theory in the fields of physics, mathematics, biology, medicine. Some chemists focus on specific aspects, such as improving the quality of the environment or creating drugs designed to cope with certain symptoms such as immune system diseases and certain types of cancer There are also people. By creating and exploring various chemicals and chemical processes, chemistry creates a wide range of knowledge among researchers, scientists and academics. This knowledge is essential for the production of goods and services widely used in society around the world, such as clothing and building materials. Dentists use chemicals to understand the relationship between various chemicals and mouth. An example is the cranial nerve and what chemicals interact with what they can do. It is also a requirement of modern dentists to understand the chemistry of enamel and to understand how it interacts with the compounds used for crowns, veneers and fillings.

Plato believes that there is always a fair society. To answer this question, we must first explain what the fair society constitutes. The perfect condition can only be guided under perfect conditions. Civil society is a better name for the state. A fair country consists of three parts. First, the state is a structure in which parts behave like organisms. If parts do not work well, the whole part will crash. It must have virtue, integrity, it can be wise and courageous. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. Do you believe Plato can have a fair society? To answer this question, we must first explain what the fair society constitutes. The perfect condition can only be guided under perfect conditions. Civil society is a better name for the state. A fair country consists of three parts. First, the state is the structure where the parts work together like living things. If parts do not work well, the whole part will crash. It must have virtue The Republic written by Plato examined a lot. It's mainly about a good life. Plato seems to believe that a perfect life can only be guided under perfect conditions. It is a perfect society. In a perfect society, there must be justice. In the Republic, justice seems to be defined in various ways. In this article, I will discuss some. First of all, I think the reason why Glaucon and Adeimantus think that justice is a bad thing, and Glaucon, who lives in Plato, only men who are afraid of being caught or punished by him or being afraid of being infamous I think that I am worried. He explained the decision within the stories of the two Lord's circles. Each time he turns with his finger, the magic ring will make the man invisible. He believes that everyone will act in the same manor. They break into an invisible house and help to do whatever they want. Plato considers that justice is essential to social well-being. But he believes that most people in society are considered to be rather unfair and just. This is because people believe that they gain more profit by violating the law. Normally, people are concerned about being punished by their misconduct, so there is no danger of breaking the law. Plato discussed how to prevent illegal behavior of ordinary people. For this reason, Plato considers that society should select specific people to rule in order to minimize government corruption. Plato supports a system where leaders can only develop their own abilities because they are in an isolated environment. He believes that leaders, those with golden quality, can only manage society of justice. Therefore he isolates gold citizens from the rest of society and insists that their unique attributes flourish.

It was a cold night, it was a very cold night. She sat quietly in the corner of the bathroom and cried while sipping. Stacy is 17 years old, tall, healthy and gorgeous. She lives in a luxurious house with her father, brothers, and her stepmother, five years older than her. In school, she is the cheerleading team captain and the most popular girl. According to someone who does not know much about life, she is idle. The other side of her life is that they do not know. After seven years in the Delta district, the crew of Starship Voyager now faces a strange world. For Admiral Catherine Jane and her officers, returning to the miracle of the traveler brought new glory and new responsibilities. For many years, the challenge of creating new lives in federation seems to be meaningless to them, for people who have met with another relative or people like Doctor of Seven and Seven of Seven. But even though Janeway and others are breaking apart for another horizon and opportunity, strange cybercrime plagues the planet and turns men, women and children into a new generation of Borg. Immediately, the whole planet faces assimilation, travelers - returning from the center of Borg - may be the perpetrator The relationship between Pythagoras' philosophy and reincarnation was often accepted throughout the ancient times. In Plato of the Republic, Socrates talked to the son of Armenius a miraculous resurrection on the twelfth day after death and telling a way to tell the secrets of the other world. In other conversations Phaedrus' Chariot's allegory, Meno, Timaeu ​​s, Law all share the same myth and theory. When the soul is separated from the body, it will spend an indeterminate time in "form" (see republic cave fables), then it will pretend to be another body For my wife to go home - if she gets the magical result of our pray - she will face more physical rules. The American rules firstly stole the body of her country, the people of our country, then forbid them to enter, then fight and kill them one after another and then stop them racism I bought it. She must be an exception. Currently the US is expelling Korea (and other international) recruits, even though only their body knows about their destinations. My wife keeps Korean citizenship because her government now covers most 90% to 95% of her health care (she dies as an American citizen) . Visa provision

In addition, Zeus ordered the development of a law regulating social behavior: those who do not comply with social norms will be killed. Therefore, only a few people possess certain types of skills (basic life related skills), but they all have the citizens' strengths (political recognition). Protagoras concluded that the foundation of Athens' political regime is an understanding of this fact. Even after reaching this position Protagora continues to deal with punitive justice problems. Since punishment can not solve crime, it is irrational to punish the wrongdoing of past actions. This is to counter Socrates' claim of 2500 years ago in the Protagoras dialogue, and Socrates believes that virtue can actually be taught. By proclaiming virtue as part of the whole, Socrates can teach Socrates to quote below where it passed. Socrates ask you to talk to himself and the third party Protagoras by talking about his new absurdity. "I will guarantee you." I said, (Socrates) 'When I do all these questions I have no other opinion, but I talk about virtue and itself I am passionate about learning about the truth. If we can clearly understand this, I know that I fully clarify the discussion issues you and I raised. And you are such Plato presented Socrates' view on several conversations, especially whether it is possible to teach virtue in Protagoras and Meno. In this way, Menomenon asks Socrates the following question: "Socrates - can you teach virtue, or is it otherwise achieved through practice? It is accomplished by teaching Does it essentially be obtained by people, or is it obtained in other ways? "Socrates insists that he" does not know the minimum thing about virtue "and that quality I can not say that I can argue. In addition, he insists that nobody knows this. . The next argument is whether Takayama people, Takayama's people might not be such people. Both Socrates and Menon know the teachings of Gorgius. Menon seems to have earned a higher evaluation about Gorgias teaching than Socrates. According to the Socrates' proposal it was agreed that the conversation should continue to explore Menon 's view, not Gorgia' s view on virtue. So Socrates asked Menon a question: "Do you think virtue is a hat?"

Plato's Recollection Paper 1: Plato's Recollection Theory (September 29, 2000) "Retrospective Theory" implicitly includes all true knowledge and can be brought into consciousness through expression I express it. In this paper, using the concept of "form", "detail", "knowledge", "perspective of reality" of Platonic, we learned what is memorable, what can not be learned, why all knowledge is based on memory, I will explain why it can not be proved. The soul is immortal. According to the recollection theory of Plato, we have all the knowledge in nature, understanding this knowledge involves finding it. The soul once lived in "reality", but was trapped in the body. It existed in "reality" with universal knowledge, but it was trapped in the body and forgot its predecessor. The body and sensation keep us away from the truth. In Phaedo 66 (bd), Plato said: "As long as we keep our bodies and our souls are contaminated by this imperfection, we can not change our goals We can not do.We claim this is the truth.The survival gives us a myriad of distractions and any disease that attacks us has hindered the pursuit of our reality.The body is love, desire and Fear, and full of all sorts of fantasies and many nonsense. Opportunities to think about anything. Concerns about essential inexplicability and lack of the material world urged Plato to propose a reminiscence theory that our intangible and immortal souls made formal discussions before being imprisoned in the body . If that form is the (basic) purpose of knowledge and that form is not in the real world, we must acquire knowledge at some point before commerce with the world. However, metaphysical questions about simple forms also affect how we conceptify knowledge in these medium-term studies. If the format is simple, that knowledge seems intuitive or acquaintance. In a way contrary to the proposition, people see the form itself in some way. The central book of the Republic proposes such a picture. Golgias 465 a, 501 a 2 - 3, Republic 534 b). These clauses seem to imply that the knowledge may be some form of rational truth Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato

About Euthyphro: Notes of Sidney Fein He said that when he was young, Rabbi Israel studied 800 Kabala books. But when he first saw Mezritch 's plaid facing face to face, he knew that he soon did not know anything. I have a mentoring version of Plato's wonderful dialogue translated by W. H. D. Rouse, a university textbook for my daughter on my desk. It costs 4.95 dollars. This is a very good book with convenient footnotes and minimal academic barriers. Editors include six conversations: Ion, Meno, Symposium, Republic, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Saoterte met Yutiflo outside the court of the kingdom governor and did not believe the prosecution of his father's murder by Ytiflo was justified or pious after hearing what Yutiflo was there. He asked Euthyphro to teach him that he is religious and not religious to himself as he can see himself that Euthyphro is a pious act against his father. Then this started a core discussion - a rigorous discussion of faith and rude. Euthyphro tried to explain Socrates' dedication and willingness by first giving his example. He said, "The devout thing is to do what I am doing now to prosecute criminals, such as murder and temple robbery, as your father is your mother or someone else "(5e) Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith)

Algren Nelson and HonoréDeBalzac may have come from different times, but they are considered to be great writers. Their books share one thing in common and give the reader a deeper understanding of the time and certain places. These authors' books allow viewers to see life from different perspectives and understand ways to get rid of poverty. Both Nelson and Balzac have similar plots dealing with troubles and dilemmas by money. Although their books are fictitious, these stories are very real, as Nielsen and Balzac lived in their books and experienced a similar struggle. I like to read books on how writers become writers. Like a prodigious genius: The life and age of Honore De Balzac by Noel B. Gerson (my own 325 books). Gerson's book on Balzac is my favorite book on writers and his way. I did not want to read Balzac's books in French like Emil Zola's La Terre. However, I visited Balzac 's grave at Pere Lachaise Cimetiere and restricted the intake of caffeine. I like Raymond Chandler's life by Frank McShane of the classical genre. Chandler is the accountant of Dabni Oil Company in Los Angeles. Chandler was forbidden to drink alcohol and found himself drifting when he was 44 years old. His wife, Xi Xi, is 62 years old. They have no money. So Chandler taught himself to write a pulp novel to pay the rent. He wrote seven detective stories, even though a small family thought it was literature. Joe Meno is a novelist living in Chicago. He is the Nelson Algren award, the wheelbarrow award, the winner of the Great Lakes Book Awards, and the finalist of the Story Awards. The best-selling writer of seven novels including cursed hairstyle and boy detective failure is Professor of Columbia College of Creative Writing. His latest work is Marvel and Wonder. Alix Pentecost - Farren is an illustrator, a cartoonist, an artist. Her work includes stationery design, mud wall painting, animation and installation. She went to North Carolina Art University to learn art and design, then studied illustration and film production at Rhode Island Design University and moved to Brooklyn, New York. Her clients include Thrillist, McDonalds, Rising Stars Magazine, Josh Garrels, Margaret Glaspy / ATO Records, Mason Jar Music Films.

Argument on the use of expiration date Because of lack of attention or understanding of English grammar, many Americans have used adjectives as part of prepositional phrases to introduce adverbial elements - strict grammar Part of the objection. I prefer their prescription, but for style reasons I have to oppose their legitimacy claim based on logic and sensitivity. The most basic discussion on the use of adverbs is etiquette or style. Errors are arguments that involve erroneous reasoning or error of argumentation. For several reasons, the discussion provided by Jane John, the principal of the usual township district, is not a good discussion. The amount of evidence provided to support these conclusions is not enough to provide a good discussion. In addition, delay after death is used to support the conclusion. Post hoc analysis is to assume that a particular event is caused by another event. That is because it is done in a timely fashion. Johnson's only evidence indicates why a 7% increase is caused by a computer program, as the computer program is increased one year after it is purchased. This evidence alone is not enough to support this argument. For example, if possible, the controversy can say that a new computer program is the only educational equipment used to prepare for the exam. Figure 1 shows the parametric map of the parameters of Plato Meno. Recent interest in discussion visualization (especially visualization of computer-aided discussions) is that the use of software programs designed to help students to build discussion maps is important for students' Suggests that critical thinking skills can be remarkably improved 2003; van Gelder, 2001, 2003). But, of course, people do not need to use computer software to create parametric maps; people only need pencils and paper out. However, to the best of our knowledge, it has not been studied. The controversial mining has become a sub-field of data mining or text mining (or computational linguistics). It uses software and algorithms to automatically process the text and find the parameter structure for prerequisites, conclusions, arguments, and extended parameter networks. Researchers have studied legal documents, online discussions, product reviews, scholarly literature, user comments on suggested regulations, newspaper articles and litigation, and methods of controversial mining in the conversation discipline. Arg-tech at Forum Technology Center plays a central role in these developments.

Both Plato and Augustine offer the rare concept that people have to get to live a truly happy life. The traditional view of happiness is often related to wealth, financial stability, and material wealth, but Plato and Augustine are rooted in what true happiness is independent of things and people I believe. They have different concepts about this real root, but each philosophy regards this happiness as a way and direction. Plato's philosophy is centered on the balance between eternal knowledge and metaphysics. Plato (Platonicism) - Plato's philosophy and other conversations in Meno have influenced Augustine's memory concept. Plato believes learning is memory, and the soul rediscovers the truth it knows before it is born. Augustine insisted on philosophy as the pursuit of the most noble life from Xcelo, which was deeply influenced by the same allegations of the plateau. According to Plato's rejection, Augustine also declared how the soul was related to the body at the time of birth or before birth. Both Plato and Augustine offer the rare concept that people have to get to live a truly happy life. The traditional view of happiness is often related to wealth, financial stability, and material wealth, but Plato and Augustine are rooted in what true happiness is independent of things and people I believe. They have different concepts about this real root, but each philosophy regards this happiness as a way and direction. - According to Plato, the soul of Aristotle and Augustine can be defined as an eternal mystery that people can never understand. However, many people accepted the challenge of effectively interpreting the content of the soul, and outlined their desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle and Augustine. All three have their own perspective, but the similarity between the views is very sharp. Both Aristotle and Saint Augustine were influenced by Plato. The philosophy of their morality, politics, and purpose of life is under the influence of Platonicity. St. Augustine is the true heir of Plato, as it took Plato's ideal country and revealed the influence of the life of citizens of the earth in the city of God. The state of Plato is an ideal state which does not actually function. - In this philosophical scientific research paper I will proceed as follows. First, I will explain the pros and cons of creation and evolution. Next, according to Saint Augustine and Charles Darwin, we will analyze the philosophical scientific reasons for this problem. Finally, I guess my results and give scientific advice. Many people have asked this question. Where are you from. Please create the universe based on creationist, or higher powers of "God"

Plato's Theetetus is one of the most read and interpreted text under the philosophical theme. In the dialect, many topics and questions are analyzed and revealed. Leon Pearl The Theetetus is dreaming? The author discusses the position above the theme of "dream" and "awake" given in Theaetetus. Pearl criticized this question: "Why are we sleeping now, or are all our dreams a dream, are they waking up awaking and talking to each other?" Theaetetus is an ancient Greek philosopher one of Plato's medium-term and late-stage dialogue. Plato is a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle. Like most of Plato's conversations, the main character is Socrates. In Theaetetus, Socrates talks with the boy Theaetetus and his mathematical teacher Theodorus. This dialogue is the most persistent argument about Plato's knowledge concept, but it can not produce sufficient knowledge definitions and therefore can not be completed. Despite the lack of a clear definition, Theaetetus is still a source of infinite academic appeal. In addition to emphasizing the nature of cognition, it also considers various philosophical issues: Socratic dialectic, Heraclitian flux, purely relativism, rhetorical and philosophical life, and falsehood. Judgment These issues are also discussed in other Platonic conversations. From the early days, the essence of knowledge was always the central issue of philosophy. One of the most wonderful dialogues of Plato, Theaetetus is trying to achieve satisfactory conceptual definition, Plato's dual ontology - the eternal form of the real world contrasts with the less sensible world relying on epistemology - It is basic. The problem of knowledge plays an important role in most major philosophical systems. If philosophy is considered an ontological cause, as an effort to explain the ultimate essence of reality or to tell the reality, it requires a preliminary investigation of the extent and validity of knowledge. It is only reasonable to say that there is a possibility that existence is known The question of what constitutes "knowledge" is as old as philosophy itself. Early examples appeared in Plato's dialogue, especially Meno (97a-98b) and Teatetos. Gattier himself was not the first person to actually question him; its existence was approved by Alexius Meinong and Bertrand Russell. He discussed in his book "Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limitations". This is a problem. As shown in the figure below, Russell's case is called a stop clock incident. In fact, this is two o'clock. But there is a problem. Alice does not know that the clock she is watching stopped 12 hours ago. Therefore, Alice has unexpected, reasonable beliefs. Russell provided his own answer to this question.

Theodore is probably one of the last great reformers, but his great influence burns his passion. For his powerful writing and teachings, his enemies did everything they could to stop him. Please inform us of Theodore now before we say. He was born in Vezley, France on June 24, 1519. Born in my father Pierre de Beza and my mother Marie Brudelot. When he was in college, he went to Paris for education from the famous German teacher Melchior Wolmar. After a while his teacher followed Bourges. It is short-lived. But continental reforms, Martin Luther of Wittenberg, John Calvin, Geneva, Theodore de Bates, Zurich Ulrich Zwingri and Heinrich Bringer, Martin Buzer and Peter Mater Bermigri, they invited to Thomas Cranma They are Edward VI Britons, they are most popular. Some have stayed bystander proof unless they tell the day, relying on the most important book of Protestantists in faith and inner life, and their narrow-minded pastor and theologian scholars They are trained by Reasons in the British Revolution and the Challenge of Religious Socialism Author: Shaola Mengzhou. PP. Vii, 264, Cambridge University Press, 2010, £ 55.00 Jacobs Alminius, Theodore de Baise, Martin Buzer, Andreas von Carlstadt, Heinrich Bringer, Baltacer Hubmeier, Thomas Cranmer, W illiam Farrell, Thomas Müntzer, Laurentius Petri, Olaf Peeterson, Philip · Melanchthon, part of the most important activities of Protestant reform including Meno Simons, Louis de Berquin, Primož Trubar, and John Smyth. In the religious turmoil of this process, the German farmers' war of 1524-2525 hit Bayern, Thuringia and the Swabian principality. The war in the war of the war "in the low country and religion in the war in the French war of 80 years, the division confession state of the Holy Roman Empire ultimately broke out in 16 years from 1618 to 1648 in 30 years." It destroyed the majority of Germany, 25 people died, accounting for 10% and 40% of the population. The main principles of peace in Westphalia that ended the 30 year war are as follows.

We define knowledge as the virtues of recognition, familiarity, consciousness or understanding state and fact, and moral excellence and justice gained through experience and learning. All of us have knowledge, but not all knowledge we have is the same as virtue, not necessarily the same. Every one of us has merits, but not everyone is practicing it. It is a gift from God, so we all have knowledge. We can keep it and share it with others. Through knowledge, people can also understand the understanding of human self and what he is around. People can teach life through knowledge. Having knowledge can also know what is right and what is wrong. If you have knowledge, you can also make changes and improvements. For example, the more we understand the disease, the more you know about that disease, the better you can know about the disease and improve your life. We can improve through physical and spiritual knowledge Although we can identify problems and find solutions through knowledge, these problems are caused not by knowledge itself but by the use of knowledge by individuals. By understanding these problems easily, vision of solution was born. Knowledge is a virtue and we should know what is good for us. Virtue is good or correct. For example, if you make a mistake, for example if you misuse power knowledge, it is not because knowledge already exists. It is emotion that he is doing this. If this is the case, he will not have virtue. Knowledge is like other virtues that we should maintain and is always remembered. We should use it instead of pursuing superiority over others, but we should share it and make them better individuals. Through knowledge, we know how to understand, we know how to do the right thing. We must use knowledge fairly so that we can understand virtues. Therefore, knowledge is the creation of virtue. Knowledge is virtue In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. Plato provided his explanation for two different works, Protagora and the Republic of Virtue. Through Socrates in Protagoras Plato, I believe that virtue is knowledge. The premise of discussion is that everyone wants what they think is good. Because of this we are impossible because if we do bad things or do bad things, we want to do it, know bad things, do it, and believe it is good You can see that there is. To distinguish between good and bad people is not a wish for good things. Therefore, the concept of human virtue of Plato comes down to understanding good and choosing the most profitable behavior correctly. In order to be kind, Socrates insists that we must understand the real virtue. In other words, understanding the nature of virtue is a necessary and sufficient condition to make people gentler. This explains why Socrates talks to his fellow Atheni and always looks for definitions or essences of a particular virtue. He believes that people will understand that virtue is inherently good when people reach the right definition of virtue. In addition, because people want to obtain benefits as a matter of course, we can guarantee happiness only in this way, so people have no choice but to be kind on this knowledge. To summarize this idea, it is useful to express it with a simple expression: knowledge = virtue = happiness. When we gain knowledge of virtue, we will be kind and will make our soul beautiful. When we make our soul perfection, we will get real happiness.

Sabe agrees with the majority of what Socrates said about the soul, but I do not believe that the soul will condense and continue to be active and intellectual after death. For example, he suggests that when the soul leaves the body it may dissipate like breath or smoke, so it no longer exists as a coherent unit. The Socrates' answer first considered the myth that the soul existed in other worlds after death, and after a period it returned to another institution in the world. If this is the case, Socrates suggests that the soul must condense after death, otherwise it can not return to animations of other bodies. So the mission of Socrates is to show that the soul of the dead can return to the world with other bodies. Socrates introduced controversy from the other side. He insisted that everything came from the opposite. For example, for large objects, you need to make them smaller in advance, and you need to make them larger because of their small size. In addition, there are two generation types between the facing faces, each of which is generated between different forms. For example, there is a dual process that increases and decreases between sizes. Then Socrates pushed his view to the house by asking if Sebes was against his life. Sevez said that death is the opposite of life. From the argument opposite to this discussion, you can see that the life from death to death, the creatures themselves from the process of death, must change from death to life. Socrates also pointed out that the world will die soon if this is not the case. In other words, even though all living things are dead, if the new creature is not made from a dead creature, the number of dead is quickly replaced and overwhelmens the number of lives. If life can only be made by other living things, only a limited amount of biological resources will be used up. Discussion from the opposite is relatively easy to understand, but it is expressed in a number of sovereignty philosophies that are ambiguous and have many problems to be discussed. The majority of this discussion will cover both issues, but this discussion may be clarified immediately before beginning. Because nothing can be formed or stopped naturally, the idea is that all ideas are formed from the other's. If death is the reverse of life, death and life must be in a certain cycle, one at a time from the other cycle. At the end of our lives, we are dead, as well, this means that at the beginning of our life we ​​are born from the underground world of the dead soul . When Socrates insisted on the immortality of the soul, that form appeared again. One of his arguments is that when considering the doctrine of recollection, the soul must exist before it is born and therefore must be able to exist after death (72e - 73a). By this, Sèvez called for advocacy of recollection. Socrates first gave two arguments corresponding to Meno: although the discussion is not intended to prove the existence of the form, steps (1) - (5) can thus be interpreted I will. Basically, Socrates believes that sensuous experience does not explain our possession of concepts such as equality, beauty, goodness. Since these concepts are not "given" by experience, there must be other ways to get them. Before entering the correct arguments it is useful to point out what was accepted before the first argument begins with 69e. All Socrates listeners admit that philosophers are those seeking true wisdom and truth and know that the body in which he lives opposes the higher tendencies of these philosophers. The body and the body are really different. They are two separate substances and the soul obviously is superior to the body. The soul is seeking something higher: shape, truth itself and so on. However, the body interferes with these pursuits and brings down the soul from these great heights. This is metaphysical anthropology, recalling the basis for discussion The second argument about the immortality of the soul can