Many people think Aristotle is one of the most influential philosophers in history. As a student of Plato, he established his metaphysical doctrine of formal theory of his tutor and his perception of the soul. But he also challenged them and introduced his own metaphysical ideas such as behavior and effectiveness, inflectious ideology, and four reasons. He uses these ideas to account for his unimportant explanation of the soul and intelligence. Prior to Aristotle, philosophers such as Parmenides and Heraclitus discussed the existence of change. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate.

Reincarization is the theory of the soul derived from the teachings of Pythagoras, and he may be based on the concept of reincarnation in India. In reincarnation, the soul is immortalized, it passes through a cycle of incarnation at birth, and is released from the body at the time of death. Individual behavior in a particular life can determine the shape the soul takes in the next life. In Phaedrus, Plato developed this immortal soul theory. After the body dies, the soul passes through the discipline of thinking, which is why we may have some kind of knowledge through the recalling process or the process of "recollection". The background and contradiction of Plato's Phaedrus and Plato workshops are well known Plato is a faithful student of Socrates who recorded many of Socrates' speech and dialogue. From time to time, people will find that Socrates and other participants in these conversations are inconsistent with themselves, at least they seem to confuse their argument. One of them is Plato's seminar and Plato's Padres. - Concept of homosexuality based on gender: Sappho and Plato seminar Sappho's poem is about homosexuality, mainly like a lecture at the Plato seminar. From Plato's point of view, Plato's work focuses on the essence of this love between men. In Phaedrus of Plato, Socrates met Phaedrus who just talked with Lysias. Phaedrus walked Socrates with him and asked him to listen to what he learned from the conversation with Lysias. After reading and discussing the Lysias speech, the two discussed how to become a rhetorical speaker and discussed whether writing is beneficial, acceptable or disagreeable. By measuring, you can better understand not only the obvious aspects of the world but also the environment around us. Socrates recognizes the importance of this and we conclude that we must concentrate our research on the idea itself. In a conversation with Phaedrus, Plato asked, "What is good and what is wrong, need someone to talk about these?" Most of Plato's work is the same for his mentor Socrates (like the protagonist of Phaedrus). In Plato's view, this person reacts naturally to the good nature of sentences and reacts to good concepts of my life, so people already know what is good. Likewise, Wang Yangming claims intuition about moral issues. The king will agree with Plato that everyone can recognize the benefits and disadvantages of morality.

Both Plato and Nietzsche are great philosophers who formed the story of Western philosophy and were often designated as the opposite Plato set the beginning of the era of absolute truth and value. Plato's investigation of a complete society convinced him that knowledge and power must be blended in order to fully realize its possibilities. Certainly, every great philosopher seems to have his own wonderful concept. Plato has his formal theory and a cave fable; Kant suggests the problem itself and an absolute command; Nietzsche released Superman's (Superman) theory. But for Deleuze, the relationship between this concept and the philosopher is deeper. "A philosopher is a feature of his conceptual diagram, the fate of a philosopher is to become his conceptual diagram" (page 64, highlighting me)). In other words, Plato is his own shadow in the cave, or, as Druze said, there is "Socrates of Polato" or "Neon Dionysus". Essentially, a person is not just a philosopher's philosopher. True philosophers must live in their philosophy. Even though the actions of philosophers are in contrast to their own philosophy (as often happens), they must always occupy their minds. Both Plato and Nietzsche are great philosophers who formed the story of Western philosophy and were often designated as the opposite Plato set the beginning of the era of absolute truth and value. - Tennessee Williams's "Desire Streetcar" is exploring many of the important themes and problems in the book. The theme of Williams' audience survey and exploration is fantasy and fantasy. At the time, Plato and Nietzsche were the two most famous and most famous philosophers in the world. Plato's seminar is based on a series of speech about love, purpose, and existence. For each presentation, seven different people each representing a speech about love participate. Nietzsche's spoke like this Zarathustra is like a philosophical novel than a dialogue like Plato seminar. Nietzsche's writing is more about the purpose and a deep understanding of morality. Nietzsche talked about the human walk before reaching "Superman". Since "Superman" built his own values ​​and goals, Nietzsche then talked about "Superman" without any discrimination and morality (SparkNotes Editors, Summary)

Characteristics are actions that distinguish us from other species through our emotions, thoughts, and actions. These behaviors occur naturally to humans, and this property is widely related to modern science. People are "rational animals". Men's intelligent gifts may change, they may have spiritual flaws, or they may choose not to use reasons. However, the general definition still applies Human beings can know well and you can follow it by understanding it. The soul demands to cleanse itself from the body, and the soul is completely cleansed from the body only when it dies. Because he did not write anything, we know from his students, the most important are Plato and Xenophon. Socrates was sentenced to death in Tsuga venom in 399 BC. He accepted the verdict rather than running away Plato's dialogue is used to teach various topics such as philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion, mathematics and so on. When you compare the philosophical views of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, it is important to distinguish historical Socrates from Plato's Socrates. You, Socrates did not write anything by yourself. Instead, Plato recorded the lives of Socrates through dialogue. When you read most of Plato's work, it will look like a drama. With the passage of time after the death of Socrates, Plato's Socrates is not like a more historical Socrates like Plato. Historical Socrates was written by another Greek, Xenophan. Many scholars believe Plato 's death - apologies, clemes, fado, and ifero - in Socrates' dialogue are more accurate than the other works in drawing historical Socrates. Our understanding about Socrates is that he was severely affected by Pythagoras, a Pythagoras that caused the heretic criticism of other Greeks - his execution by the Greeks is It was a threat. Born in Athens aristocrat, Plato, 427 years old, he is a student of Socrates and the oldest Greek philosopher. Plato's main source of inspiration is Socrates. One of the most important problems of Socrates is about the nature of justice. After Socrates, Plato also regarded justice as the true principle of social life and cited his most important work as a republican as a justice argument, Dr. Buck said, "Justice is the turning point of his thought "Pointed out. . (Buck, 1952) In his modern world, Plato saw that the cities in the various cities were very divided and their citizens "stand in the state and attitude of the gladiator" against each other . He saw uncontrollable embarrassment and unfair behavior. He marched up and down with a knowledge shield looking at the superiority of ignorance. In order to achieve these two goals, the political teachings of the Republic have been resolved (Sabin, 1949) Plato has found a remedy to heal these evils in the judiciary.

The interpretation of Plato of justice seen in the "Republic" is quite different from what we and the philosophers of his own era are accustomed to. Plato would say that justice is an act of fulfilling his duties. Furthermore, if a person's duties require lying to a person or promising something that is not traditionally seen in justice, this is also taken into account by Plato of the "Republic". I will do my best to discuss his argument because I believe that the explanation of Plato's justice and his possible opposite defense are clear and logical. In Plato Republic, Plato investigates the question "What is justice?" Plato's goal is to prove that justice (or "virtue") is worthy of itself. To prove his theory, Plato mainly deals with social political justice, then he develops personal justice. As Socrates was a Plato teacher, Plato used Socrates as a republican philosopher. Some of the ideas mentioned in the book may have been developed by Socrates, some of which are the result of Plato's idea. In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. The essence of Socrates, Plato and justice is generally considered an important virtue. It is a symbol of truly free and fair society and is seen as a good sign of morality. Ordinary people may regard justice as a country where the crime is not universal and individuals are fair and have mutual understanding. - Keleah Johnson Greto PY 317 October 10, 2014 Comparison and comparison Many philosophers are known for their position and belief. Plato and Aristotle are the most famous philosophers. Plato was a student of Socrates once, and it turned out that he was a teacher of Aristotle. That is why both Plato and Aristotle cover most of the same issue topic, and that there is direct contrast between themes and similarities.

By examining Plato and Mill's discussion on censorship and opposition to censorship, I came to the conclusion that Mir is correct. It can not be said that this is better than the two main arguments against Mill's censorship. Because we are not perfect, it is totally inevitable for a human to make a mistake and make a mistake. Thus, in the absence of completeness, how can a person like Plato determine the perfect way to form a society? Plato makes sense because he does not care about happiness. Papers on the essence of beautiful life of Thucydides and Plato: Papers on the essence of the better life of Thucydides and Plato. Thucydides is proposing empirical claims, and there is also a claim that Plato makes a prescriptive claim. truly? Support your answer with paper. Plato and Thucydides are totally different views on strategies for better living. Many people claim that Plato is developing normative rights, while Thucydides claims empirical claims. First ... Shoot the Peloponnesus ships and help Sicily from Athens. Third, they believe that the naval forces that Corcyra provides to Athens are essential, as seen in the history of Thcyydides. Thucydides is probably Athens's most prominent politician and civilians, an important cause of the Peloponnesus war. Thucydides and Plato Thuadides and Plato, Plato and Thucydides have a very different view on the attitude towards better living about the essence of a better life. Some claim that Plato makes prescriptive claims and that Thucydides is proposing empirical claims. Let's see Plato. Plato's theory of better living is based on the belief that everything has purpose and purpose, usually applied to virtue, justice and excellence. History It is undeniable that the ancient Greek society emphasized values ​​and traditions. The two texts "Aristophanes 'clouds" and Tukidides' "History of the Peloponnese war" differ in context, but are conceptually converging. Both of these texts are built around the central theme of the collapse of traditional values. The collapse of traditional values ​​in the history of Peloponnesus war

Plato was a philosopher born in Athens (470 - 390 BC), a student of Socrates. He feels that wisdom and self-perception belong to a completely independent field or reality. He believes that the general concept of knowledge exists in the soul or even in life before it is destined or born. Plato believes that the universe is understandable and the universe is mathematically understandable. He believes mathematical objects can be seen as a perfect form. Plato has three important philosophies. Kindness, truth and beauty, and desire for eternal life. These important terms can be used to indicate Diotima's love signs. Plato's first philosophical point of view is kindness. When Socrates talked about the teachings of love of Diotima, he used a kind of ratio, that is, beauty is beautiful, and every male wants to be beautiful because it is very good. What does he want when a man loves beauty? "I answered her," Beauty may be him. "But," she said, "The answer casts another doubt: What will you give to beauty?" It's a problem for you, "I replied. The answer is not ready. "And you can put the word" good "in a beautiful place and repeat the question once again. If you love what you love, what does he love? I said. "What did he get and what did he have?" I am happy. (Symposium) As I mentioned in the devout analysis of Plato's Euthyphro, Greek philosophers Plato and Socrates are often undetectable and compatible in their contribution to their philosophical theory. When you read their thoughts and sentences, you can think of these ideas and thought experiments that were suggested mostly by two philosophers or two philosophers. In Plato Republic, Plato copied the dialogue between infamous Socrates and some of his followers. In the dialogue, Socrates was given the task of creating a perfect city. Most of the written content is actually Plato's view on utopian society, but the lecturer is called Socrates and is a famous philosopher of Greek society. Socrates' student Plato is traditionally thought to be the best source of philosopher life and work, but many scholars are hard to distinguish between the philosophical views of Plato and Socrates, and the lives of Socrates I emphasized that it is more difficult to describe accurately. For that reason, some people think that Xenophon is a more reliable source of information about Socrates as a historical figure. Plato and Xenophon are the main source of Socrates private life. From their writings, the famous ancient Greek philosopher was born in the masonry (or sculptor) Sophroniscus and his midwife his wife Phaenarete. He spent his life in Athens, but his early life has little detail. It is said that he was relatively late to marry Xanthippe, participating in the Peloponnesus War (431 - 04 BC), and Xanthippe was much younger than he. She gave him three sons - Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus

Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. If people know something (in this life) without being taught, they must learn before they are born. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. Before discussing virtue, you must first consider the only problem. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

The sun of knowledge: The history of Plato's epistemological philosophy discussed by the Republic is that its abundant works, deep questions, new ideas and teachings seeing as a result of awkward Athens work that has shaped almost all philosophical flows I can. I thought. The influence of Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher, has been said to have laid the foundation for Western culture. Plato was born in Athens aristocrat on 428/427 BC. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. This paper evaluates the relevance of Plato Republic in discussing leadership in contemporary democratic society. Specifically, Plato's "better life theory" challenges contemporary consumer culture, defines that satisfaction as desire satisfaction, criticism of democracy is about breeding democracies and choosing leaders It is casting doubt. This explanation explains the importance and difficulty of relaxing the regional conflict between private interests and the public interest. At the same time, Plato provides a leader account that will benefit the entire community, but it remains ethical. Therefore, leadership style advocates of democratic organizations can not easily raise Plato; on the other hand, careful reading of the "Republic" reveals some of the sustainable challenges facing the democratic society I will.

Introduction In this article I will explain Plato's view of reality and criticize it. I think there is a problem because Plato's argument has become a victim of many errors, and of course the most famous is the matter of a third party. First, I will explain the problems in Plato's theory. Finally, we recommend replacing Plato's theory. This question is very important as the real problem has plagued philosophy from the beginning, and many people think that this question never was satisfied satisfactory. The writing part of the Republic of Zeno is criticism of Plato's work (same name). Plato believes that most people need guidance from the lonely "philosopher king" (a person who seems to be suspicious of his author), but the Zeno Republic is conceiving a more equitable city I will. For example, he advocated a fundamental claim that citizenship should be closer in relationship than parentage (even if Engels did not do this in "families, private property and state origin"), . There are no courts, currency-using cities. Xen believes that men and women should wear the same ordinary clothes, and considering the relationship between clothes and status in the ancient world, Xeno's position emphasizes the weakening of hierarchical systems of class and sex It is that. Introduction In this article I will explain Plato's view of reality and criticize it. I think there is a problem because Plato's argument has become a victim of many errors, and of course the most famous is the matter of a third party. First, I will explain the problems in Plato's theory. Finally, we recommend replacing Plato's theory. - "If the truth of everything is always in the soul, that soul is immortal" (The Philosophical Journey 89). This shows that because the soul has the integration of all knowledge, people remember this knowledge through the context of their personal life and use their reasoning. Through the dialogue between Meno and Faedo, Plato discusses the general soul memory and the concept of immortality. Bloom is a student of Plato and his criticism of student music reflects the views of philosophers and later Nietzsche. Plato thinks that music has important educational functions. Regarding Plato, the soul is essentially divided into three parts. There is a reasonable part, spirit, appetite. What is wanted is to integrate these parts reasonably and conveniently. Music can do a lot to stimulate this harmony. Melodious music helps create a melodious soul. For Plato, martial arts music is necessary: ​​warriors have to be urged. It is not necessary to send souls to ecstasy music, deprive rationality to appetite, and make men and women be beasts.

Plato is his name and he is one of the most influential people in history as a Socrates student and an excellent philosopher about the influence of Western civilization. Born in Greece in 427 BC Plato grew up in a wealthy and noble family. When his teacher and other great Greek philosopher Socrates was tried and executed in 399 BC, he became a philosopher. Plato wrote many articles about Socrates in his ancient Greek work. Plato helped to form classical education, and we do not have a good educational base in American and Western civilization. Plato, Xenophon and Aristotle are the main sources of historical Socrates; but Xenophon and Plato are Socratic students who may idealize him; but they wrote Socrates, but the only expanded lower part Explanation, these explanations are totally presented to us. Aristotle often mentioned Socrates in his writings. Almost all of Plato's work is centered on Socrates. But the work after Plato seems to be the details of his own philosophy devoted to the mouth of his leader. The Socratic Dialogue is a series of dialogues between Plato and Xenophon in the form of debates between Socrates and others, or discussions of his concepts among the followers of Socrates. Phaedo of Plato is an example of the latter category. His apology is a monologue offered by Socrates, but it is usually combined with a dialogue. Plato is a student of Socrates. Plato founded the Athens Academy and wrote many dialogues using Socrates' questing methods to study philosophical problems. Some of the core ideas of Plato's dialogue are immortality of the soul, benefits of justice, ignorance of evil, and morphology. In stark contrast to what he calls "becoming", shape is a universal attribute of the real world. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Aristotle may be the first truly systematic philosopher and scientist. He writes articles on physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, politics, and logic. Aristotle's logic is the first logic to try to classify each effective syllabic theory. Aristotle made Alexander the Great to be a tutor. This time he soon conquered many ancient worlds. Theaetetus is an ancient Greek philosopher one of Plato's medium-term and late-stage dialogue. Plato is a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle. Like most of Plato's conversations, the main character is Socrates. In Theaetetus, Socrates talks with the boy Theaetetus and his mathematical teacher Theodorus. This dialogue is the most persistent argument about Plato's knowledge concept, but it can not produce sufficient knowledge definitions and therefore can not be completed. Despite the lack of a clear definition, Theaetetus is still a source of infinite academic appeal. In addition to emphasizing the nature of cognition, it also considers various philosophical issues: Socratic dialectic, Heraclitian flux, purely relativism, rhetorical and philosophical life, and falsehood. Judgment These issues are also discussed in other Platonic conversations.

Plato and Aristotle Plato and Aristotle were the two philosophers of the 4th century and had views on politics and philosophy. Raphael's Athens Academy (1510-11, Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican) is a subtle example of the fact that Plato is drawn as a high-level form and Aristotle supports the natural sciences I condemned it. In the discussion of politics, the position of each philosopher is an essential element. Plato pointed out that it is not a coincidence that the philosopher ruler rich in knowledge should be a governor of the city state in "Republic". Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. When talking about ancient Greek, the first ideas were Plato and Aristotle. These two names are the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have almost always to say. Ethics, politics, science, science, mathematics, geometry etc. are all interested in this topic. Plato is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece, born at Stadix in Athens City in 424 BC, died in 348 BC. At the same time, Plato is also a student of Socrates. Plato founded the academy, the first higher education institution in Western Europe, in Athens.

Plato and Aquinas: Perspectives on education The field and concept of education is a broad and long-standing philosophical theme. For centuries, educated people and the public have regretted, argued, discussed and discussed their status in society. For decades, the value and demand of education has consumed the world of politics. To educate young people in the future you need a lot of energy and money. The school we know today is a relatively new concept within the time frame, but since the early days of humanity there has been a wider educational concept. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" of the book. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. Socrates, the seventh republic book, told Socrates that he was an interlocutor of him, imagining a group of prisoners trapped together as they were children of underground caves. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said: Understanding Plato's first work, in the cave fable, Socrates formed an understanding between appearance and reality and the deception we used through the use of the shape. In the cave, the experience of prisoners is limited to the emotions their senses can convey to them, the shadows on the walls and their bonds; these emergence is the idea they have to form. When one of the prisoners begins to question his reality, he leaves the cave and walks into the sun. This prisoner The cave fable is an extended metaphor that provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. People in the cave portray us as society, and Plato suggests we are a prisoner in the cave just by shadows of things. However, the cave also represents the state of mankind, and we all begin with a cave. According to Ronald Nash, Plato believes Plato will use the cave to symbolize the physical world; things are not always the same world, there are more worlds people think. The outside world is expressed as thought, thought, and reality world - throughout the world of thought Plato is talking about unimportant forms, and these nonphysical forms represent higher, more accurate reality . In other words, "According to Plato, our senses only pursue the reality of shadows, shapes, or ideas of reality.This kind of reality is accurately identified only by rational feelings, not physical emotions it can".

For more than 2000, various philosophers have questioned about the influence of art on our society. They transcend the world using abstract reasoning, human emotions, logic and find answers to the existence of art. For philosophers, art is not for its own beauty, but for the question of how art and artists can help stabilize our society for the next generation Thing. Plato, Greek philosopher who lived in 420-348 BC. In Athens, Plato's student Aristotle opposed his beliefs and the steps they took to understand the purpose of art and art were no exception. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Introduction Plato and Aristotle are two famous literary critics of ancient Greece. Aristotle is a student of Plato. They all think that art is a type of imitation. But their attitude toward imitation is quite different. Plato says that poetry is merely an imitation and has the potential to adversely affect humans, so it is worthless and bad. On the contrary, Aristotle admits that poetry is imitation, but he thinks that it is better, even better. He also explained that imitation life should be evaluated rather than discount ("Platto and Aristotle").

Probably the most famous work on Plato's justice and its values ​​is the subject of Socrates's unique idea and the challenges he faces when speaking with other philosophers. Still, justice is not the only topic Plato studies in his work. In the Republic, simple arguments about justice and various characteristics of the city escalated to discussion of individual souls. Socrates initially proposed an agreement that the city is composed of individuals, so that its characteristics can be seen also in individuals. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Analysis of the form and meaning of the Republic of Plato I. Introduction One of the main contents of the Plato Republic is that justice maximizes the well-being of people practicing it, not just for its own interests. This article will decide (a) what his happiness means, (b) the extent of his existence in his ideal state, and (c) whether this proves his interest in some way or not Consider Plato 's claim to support this paper for. Proposal for justice In Plato Republic, Plato investigates the question "What is justice?" Plato's goal is to prove that justice (or "virtue") is worthy of itself. To prove his theory, Plato mainly deals with social political justice, then he develops personal justice. As Socrates was a Plato teacher, Plato used Socrates as a republican philosopher. Some of the ideas mentioned in the book may have been developed by Socrates, some of which are the result of Plato's idea. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC) The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the book 'Republic'. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. Socrates, the seventh republic book, told Socrates that he was an interlocutor of him, imagining a group of prisoners trapped together as they were children of underground caves. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said:

Confucius, Plato Confucius and Plato are the two most historical teachers who are most respected and widely studied. Philosophical thinking on how to rule people and what characteristics should be developed for good leaders. Both ideas are good for the civilizations they live in and there are many similarities in their ideas. My view on an ideal leader is a mixture of these two ideas. Their two personal experiences also play an important role in shaping their own ideas. When you look at Confucius and Plato in bulk, it is clear that they all affect the classic era. Confucius teachings are more acceptable than Plato's dialogue, probably because the teachings of Confucius are not trying to alter the political control of the Republic of Plato. They are convinced that truth and justice will be supported through moral thinking and action. Confucius '' Confucius aleale '' method mainly focuses on self realization. Confucius, Plato Confucius and Plato are the two most historical teachers who are most respected and widely studied. Philosophical thinking on how to rule people and what characteristics should be developed for good leaders. Both ideas are good for the civilizations they live in and there are many similarities in their ideas. My view on an ideal leader is a mixture of these two ideas. - Plato and Confucius today have thousands of trustworthy philosophers people have to learn, so choosing learners is a burden. Everyone has wonderful knowledge and insight, and then you can learn something. Some people do not call themselves a philosopher, but bring philosophical thinking to us, and some people devote their lives to the love of wisdom. In the last few thousand years, few philosophers have done detailed research like Plato (probably Aristotle and Confucius are his only equality in this regard). I will do with the enthusiasm of the Renaissance humanist, and I recently introduced the complexity of Greek grammar and prepared to settle the giant of this idea. But when thinking about Plato, our idea usually imagines a philosopher philosopher (the prince of a philosopher), we are a writer of the huge republic or eloquent poet - a philosopher apologizing (even law maintenance) However, I do not think much about Plato's so-called secondary dialogue.

One of the most fundamental problems that moral philosophy applies to our daily lives is the relationship between truth and philosophy. Before people fully understand how this relationship is understood by Platon, I understand how Plato understands truth and happiness as an independent entity, namely truth and happiness is needed. Platon never declares the truth explicitly; instead, he is closest to explaining the characteristics of truth (as he has adjusted justice before the republic). Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age

The Republic, written by Plato, has considered a lot. It's mainly about a good life. Plato seems to believe that a perfect life can only be guided under perfect conditions. It is a perfect society. In a perfect society, there must be justice. In the Republic, justice seems to be defined in various ways. In this article, I will discuss some. First of all, Glaucon and Adeimantus argue that justice is a bad thing and that we believe better to send an unfair life. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC) As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.

Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. The Socrates investigation method questioned his beliefs on their beliefs and often led them to a state of confusion or Plato called "melancholy". Meno has examples of many Socratic techniques, also written by Plato. The apology was written by Plato 's Socrates trial, and at the age of seventy - seven, Socrates was condemned to have defeated the young Athenian people. Plato's story includes three speech Socrates made during the trial. Socrates talked with the Athenians before his jury in 399 BC and acknowledged that he had forgotten who he was himself. The trial began with the prosecutor sued the accused in front of the jury of Athens. In this trial, Meretas believed that Socrates committed a crime committed by the youth of Athens and made rude. Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand his quest and the Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. Approach to the quest of Socrates caused the audience to question their beliefs and often led to the state of confusion or the state of Plato called "depression". Meno has many examples of Socratic method written by Plato. . Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

As Socrates of Plato Republic explains, wisdom, courage, kindness, and justice are the four basic virtues that an ideal country must establish. Among the eight books of the Socrates dialogue, the concept of ideal conditions and justice is controversial at the individual and national level. A detailed description of the perfect state and how it works. Socrates covers all aspects of political life and how it should work, saying, "Until power and philosophy become exactly the same ... the city will not have any form of cheating". Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC)

Society always seeks the true concept of justice. On the contrary, in theory, society is always seeking the true concept of justice. In fact, justice is just a word that is usually applied to the concept of fragmentation, people with the power, you can use it in order to more effectively manage the people responsible. Human beings for completely the true meaning of justice in the general level do not understand, this term could be the words that are most used in any language. I lot of people who were in front of our eyes is probably think they have already determined the meaning, over time, changes in the concept of justice also seems to be suitable for the era. According to Plato, justice is "offering everything fit for him" (Republic, Bk.1). We might think that it is borrowing to people that they deserve it, or because they have moral rights, deserving people. Let's say that we inserted these ideas into the resultant principle. Then, the theory that not only the number of outcomes of welfare is included in the evaluation of things, but also the extent to which people are given rights and the degree of respect for moral rights is obtained. However, to end this, it is to limit the ambition of the explanation. The theory is only based on the assumption that there is no explanation. The theory of consequence based on the premise that justice is constituted by such things, justice is one of the things to be promoted, and the constituent elements of justice are not explained. I did not explain what the desert is The concept of justice and justice in 1984 was an important theme of George Orwell in 1984. Justice is defined as "profit of strong" by Plato. Justice played an important role in society in 1984. Unlike justice, the hero of the text is not a society where they live. In Orwell 's novel "1984", an extremely controlled totalitarian government was called a party and dominated society. They introduced a telescreen monitor to maintain the continuation of fear and hatred for 'enemies'. Does Winston's reaction to the person lying on the sidewalk coincide with your current understanding of his role? The answer may change. 7. How is the lottery of 1984 similar to the lottery of today? Millions of people took part, but few winners. It brings false hopes to many people. In our society, some people make a living by "predicting" the number of people. 8. What kind of item did Winston discover? According to Plato, "Justice in the lives and actions of the people can only be done in the mind and soul of citizens." Plato's individuals are constantly seeking a balance between rights and obligations to achieve individual justice. This lack of balance leads to 'parallel justice'. This is a revolution, it is always violent. If a minority uses the majority, parallel justice will occur to offset that effect.

Confusion and confusion bother everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Some people are confused about the confusion in the general sense and the confusion of the actual expression of other people. How will this confusion occur? Plato raised a dilemma that seemed to indicate what they could not do. The object of the decision O1 and O2 must be known or unknown to judge x. Suppose one of the objects such as O1 is not recognized by x. In this case, O1 can not calculate the concept of x at all. It is because x can only make judgments using objects you know. Therefore, if O1 is not an object recognized by x, x can not make a decision on O1. More importantly, x can not make a wrong decision about O1. On the other hand, if you know that x is O1 and O2, x can make some judgment on O1 and O2, but it is not a false decision "O1 is O2". If x knows O1 and O2, x must know that O1 is O1 and O2 is O2 and identifying them can be confusing. Obviously the wrong belief is impossible if the judge does not know O1 and O2; it is impossible if he knows O1 and O2. Confusion and confusion bother everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. - Philosophers are known for casting doubts on ideals; see all choices and the most important options. Aristotle and Plato are immersed in an unknown world of political situation, but Aristotle is a strict utopia structure and group of Plato compared to the ideal state of the country's personal status, representing an equal ruling country for the individual I will. The reverse is true. The ideal state of Plato is strictly constructed by utopian ideals. The part is birth, wealth and virtue; for Plato, they are appetite, spirit and reason. Like Plato, Aristotle purely owes some people for production activities, but their difference is that the ideal Aristotle does not contain three qualities (for Plato this is an appetite Class). A similar discussion took place at 4.4. In particular, in relation to wealth, Aristotle considers riches not to be one of the elements of happiness but a necessary condition and tool for good behavior. The same way of thinking in the political context indicates that the rich do not claim rights because it only provides "need" and does not contribute directly to better living.

Phaedo, Plato of Plato of "The Phaedo" explains his theory of the shape and concept of the soul's death. We know that the soul and the body are separated, the soul lives after death, and we have lived until now. This allows us to understand the concept of morphology and how we get it before birth. It is only death that the soul is away from the body. Because the soul can only obtain formal knowledge from the body, you can understand that the sole time after death is the soul that gains this information. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Confusion and confusion bother everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Some people are confused about the confusion in the general sense and the confusion of the actual expression of other people. How will this confusion occur? Plato raised a dilemma that seemed to indicate what they could not do. The object of the decision O1 and O2 must be known or unknown to judge x. Suppose one of the objects such as O1 is not recognized by x. In this case, O1 can not calculate the concept of x at all. It is because x can only make judgments using objects you know. Therefore, if O1 is not an object recognized by x, x can not make a decision on O1. More importantly, x can not make a wrong decision about O1. On the other hand, if you know that x is O1 and O2, x can make some judgment on O1 and O2, but it is not a false decision "O1 is O2". If x knows O1 and O2, x must know that O1 is O1 and O2 is O2 and identifying them can be confusing. Obviously the wrong belief is impossible if the judge does not know O1 and O2; it is impossible if he knows O1 and O2. Confusion and confusion bother everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. - Philosophers are known for casting doubts on ideals; see all choices and the most important options. Aristotle and Plato are immersed in an unknown world of political situation, but Aristotle is a strict utopia structure and group of Plato compared to the ideal state of the country's personal status, representing an equal ruling country for the individual I will. The reverse is true. The ideal state of Plato is strictly constructed by utopian ideals. The part is birth, wealth and virtue; for Plato, they are appetite, spirit and reason. Like Plato, Aristotle purely owes some people for production activities, but their difference is that the ideal Aristotle does not contain three qualities (for Plato this is an appetite Class). A similar discussion took place at 4.4. In particular, in relation to wealth, Aristotle considers riches not to be one of the elements of happiness but a necessary condition and tool for good behavior. The same way of thinking in the political context indicates that the rich do not claim rights because it only provides "need" and does not contribute directly to better living.

The greatest philosopher of ancient Greece Plato was born in Athens in 428 BC or 427 BC. It is a nobleman family. He studied in Socrates and he played a role in many conversations. He took part in the Socrates trial and the traumatic experience may lead him to try to design an ideal society. After the death of Socrates, he tried to learn widely. After 12 years he returned to Athens and founded his college, one of the earliest organized schools in Western civilization. Plato's student is Aristotle. Several other effects of Plato are Pythagoras, Anakusagorasu and Palmenide Plato was written extensively, and most of his work escaped. His work appeared in the form of dialogue, and several characters are discussing topics while interrogating each other. With this form Plato can think of various ideas and let the reader decide which ideas are valid. Plato details the format of dualism that there is a world of ideal shape that is different from the world of perception. People living in the cave can only see the glittering shadows that are reflected on the actual wall outside. This influences many later philosophers, especially neoprene tonics and gnostics, and resembles some of Hindu's double metaphysical views. Plato died in 347 BC. In the Middle Ages he broke into Aristotle. His work was preserved by descendants of Islamic scholars and reintroduced to the west during the Renaissance. Since then, he has had a strong influence on philosophy and natural science and social science. The exact order of dialogue is unknown, but the following is an agreement order based on internal evidence. In these conversations, Socrates is a central figure and is considered to express his own view. This is the only remaining record of Socratic doctrine; therefore they are called Socrates' dialogue. In these conversations, Plato began to express his views with Socrates' scorpion. Seminar and Republic are the most important works of this period Later dialogue was a deep development of philosophy expressed in early dialogue; these are the most difficult works of Plato. It is noteworthy that Plato wrote "dialogue", Aristotle wrote the paper. When a person reads Plato's conversation like Aristotle's thesis, people will not understand the conversation. Reading Plato just as we read Aristotle is one of the fates that we encountered in the English speaking community. Previous generations of British and American thinkers have read Plato as if they are reading Aristotle's thesis. Augustine, Aristotle, the traditional language landscape seen by logical positivists, in our understanding of "metaphysics" of "subjectivity" (Descartes, Kant) as "rationality as a way of understanding" Discussed. Deep connection In this traditional figure, the symbol represents an object (theme), but it is also a symbol of a concept or image in the speaker's mind (frame). A conceptual or psychological image is the manifestation of the speaker's heart and brain. Our understanding of Socrates comes from many conversations Plato wrote in 399 years. In almost every conversation, we all know more than 30 people. Socrates is the main lecturer. Plato's dialogue style is important - this is the Socratic style he used throughout the process. In the dialogue of Socrates, questions and answers, questions and answers, question and answer formats are used. This is a dialectic. Socrates will discuss two aspects of the problem in order to draw conclusions. Then, this conclusion is contrary to another hypothesis. It may be difficult to understand why Socrates is regarded as a bull fly!

In the Republic, Plato advocates his view on justice and why it is better than just fraud. In doing so, Plato seeks to establish parallelism between city justice and individual justice. City justice is manifested in the fact that each citizen performs his / her social welfare in a manner most suitable for his personality. Justice in the soul is three parts of the soul - rational, spiritual and appetizing - to express their normal function and to adjust each other. According to Plato, justice is "offering everything fit for him" (Republic, Bk.1). We might think that it is borrowing to people that they deserve it, or because they have moral rights, deserving people. Let's say that we inserted these ideas into the resultant principle. Then, the theory that not only the number of outcomes of welfare is included in the evaluation of things, but also the extent to which people are given rights and the degree of respect for moral rights is obtained. However, to end this, it is to limit the ambition of the explanation. The theory is only based on the assumption that there is no explanation. The theory of consequence based on the premise that justice is constituted by such things, justice is one of the things to be promoted, and the constituent elements of justice are not explained. I did not explain what the desert is The concept of justice and justice in 1984 was an important theme of George Orwell in 1984. Justice is defined as "profit of strong" by Plato. Justice played an important role in society in 1984. Unlike justice, the hero of the text is not a society where they live. In Orwell 's novel "1984", an extremely controlled totalitarian government was called a party and dominated society. They introduced a telescreen monitor to maintain the continuation of fear and hatred for 'enemies'. Does Winston's reaction to the person lying on the sidewalk coincide with your current understanding of his role? The answer may change. 7. How is the lottery of 1984 similar to the lottery of today? Millions of people took part, but few winners. It brings false hopes to many people. In our society, some people make a living by "predicting" the number of people. 8. What kind of item did Winston discover? According to Plato, "Justice in the lives and actions of the people can only be done in the mind and soul of citizens." Plato's individuals are constantly seeking a balance between rights and obligations to achieve individual justice. This lack of balance leads to 'parallel justice'. This is a revolution, it is always violent. If a minority uses the majority, parallel justice will occur to offset that effect.

Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, three are considered to be the typical foundation of ancient Greek philosophy. Not only are they responsible for the enlightenment of Greece, they are also foretelling the speculation of Christ there. Plato, a disciple of Socrates, became the first person to record his teacher's philosophy, which was handed over to Aristotle. This process of supporting ancient people in the evolution of politics and religion is called a linear concept. What is Socrates, Plato, Aristotle's contribution to the Western philosophy? Also, how are their legacy reflected in today's education? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the three most legendary ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates is today admired as an instant of wisdom and philosophical life. He stimulated the so-called Socratic method. And it repeatedly asked the students to help the teacher clarify their deepest ideas. Plato's student Aristotle is known for his breadth and depth of knowledge. He provided a universal, spiritual form in our material world through sensory observation and Plato's integration of scientist beliefs. He teaches that a benign life includes a gentle path between rational control of desire and choice of extreme value. When you compare the philosophical views of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, it is important to distinguish historical Socrates from Plato's Socrates. Socrates does not write anything by himself. Instead, Plato recorded the lives of Socrates in a dialogue. When you read most of Plato's work, it will look like a drama. With the passage of time after the death of Socrates, Plato's Socrates is not like a more historical Socrates like Plato. Historic Socrates was written by another Greek, Xenophan. Many scholars believe Plato 's death - apology, Krito, Fado and Itfero - in Socrates' dialogue are more accurate than depicting historical Socrates in some other works. Our understanding of Socrates is that he was seriously affected by Pythagoras, he was a monotheist - this caused accusations of other Greek heretics - by the Greeks Execution was a threat to society Plato 's national political theory is more rational than Socrates and Aristotle, but Greek philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle have nearly the same belief about the relationship between people and the country. Socrates, Plato people, and Aristotleans all think that people are not self-sufficient. They believe that people will be happiest in their life in the country. They also want all men to have a really beautiful life. They are consistent with the truth and can achieve their ultimate goal. Socrates, Plato and Aristotle have similar political views about the country, but Plato's view is more reasonable than that of Socrates and Aristotle because he created an ideal country.

Protecting biodiversity is to live on the earth in an instant. Almost all ecosystems can provide valuable resources to humans, but according to a recent report, about 40% of the earth's surface has been altered by humans. These altered surfaces provide a community for humans, but this process destroyed many native species and ecosystems. Global biodiversity is currently in danger. The extinction rate of species is estimated to change from "one day per day to one hour per hour" (Haus). Aristophanes 'love theory at the seminar 2. Aristophanes' love theory: The love discussed by people at Plato seminar seminars is gay love. Some people believe that only homosexuality can satisfy "their highest and highest lofty desires". It is said that heterosexuality is at a lower level and is only for physical reasons; its ultimate goal is to give birth. - Undefined feelings, a kind of feeling that can only be expressed, and the words used in everyday life are the love that we know. Throughout history, there are various opinions and explanations about love. When asked "What is love?", Many people think that the answer is harder to explain than their original idea. The seminar of the book explains love as "the motive of all of us" (11 pages). There are various interpretations in the story of love in "symposium". In our time, our view on what is appropriate love is quite different from the views of Socrates and the Platonic era. For them, love is love, love is a direct translation of love. However, the word itself is not the only thing different from love. At Plato 's seminar there is a celebration of Agasson. Two days ago, he just won a dramatic match in Athens, Greece ... as much of Plato's work was not as philosophical, but the seminar entered deeply into the social life of the intellectual community of ancient Greece It was. Explanation and explanation The tribute from each philosopher in the discussion examined the origins and theories of love in various forms. Several theories and themes discussed in "Seminar" were repeated, and each speaker was iteratively compared Two kinds of love at Plato seminar I thought that there was always only one kind of love. That is frustration with others. I know that desire exists It is apart from love It is a desire for somebody's body rather than their ideas. At Plato's seminar, Plato speaks of various kinds of love, and love can be regarded as desire. - The essence of love explored in the Plato workshop In the classical Greek literature, the theme of love is usually a prominent theme. But with these different texts, the theme of love will be multifaceted. From the general situation of literature, it can be thought that this theme has a big influence on daily life. Plato's seminar is a text exploring the face of many love in everyday life.

Like all the other topics discussed in the "Plato Republic", he discusses metallic myths or "lies of nobility" in a hierarchical way, asking questions and potential symbolic meanings, possible contradictions, and It raises important implications. In chapter 10 of the "Republic", Plato proposed "Liberal choice: parents lifestyle". Among them, he discussed the necessity of education as education applies to appropriate selection and compensation of community leaders. The aristocratic lie proposed by the aristocrat is a fictitious story called a metal myth or allegory (γενναῖονψεῦδος, gennaion pseudos - literally, "a lie or an erroneous view on the origin"). Among them, Socrates provided the origins of the three social classes that make up the republic proposed by Plato; Socrates talked about socially layered society where people are called "phoenician story": ..... Earth as their mother took over their land as if they were their mothers and their nurses, they considered and protected her from every attack and protected others You should deal with the citizens of the same earth Brothers and children of the same earth ... All of you in the city are brothers, we will talk in the story, but God forms people worthy to master control They mix gold into their generation, so they are most precious - but farmers and other craftsmen's assistants, silver, iron and brass Like all the other topics discussed in the "Plato Republic", he discusses metallic myths or "lies of nobility" in a hierarchical way, asking questions and potential symbolic meanings, possible contradictions, and It raises important implications. In chapter 10 of the "Republic", Plato proposes "the same as other regions of the Republic", Plato carefully outlines the boundaries forming the basis of the type of ruler set up in the state I will. "Rulers" (legislation and customs), "assistants" (enforcers) and "craftsmen" (productivity and effectiveness) are not based on birth or wealth, but based on natural abilities and desires There. Plato is convinced that any child born in any class should move up and down according to its merits, regardless of its connection and heritage.

What is philosophy? How is it different from science, religion and other human discourse patterns? This course follows the philosophical origin of an ancient Greek philosopher in the Western tradition. We started with a philosopher of nature who was active in the theocratic politics of Ionia in the 6th century BC and was thought to be the first scientist. Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximines made bold recommendations on the final elements of reality, Heraclitus claimed that there is a potential order in the changing world. Elea's Parmenides expressed strong opposition to all these proposals, later Greek theorists (such as Anaxagoras and atomician Democritus) tried to answer this opposition. In Athens of the 5th century, Socrates claimed the importance of basic ethical problems - "How do you live?" - his student Plato and Plato student Aristotle was well designed to explain the reality We developed a philosophy system. The essence of knowledge and human happiness. After Aristotle's death, Hellenistic era, Epicurean and Stoic schools developed and transformed the early tradition. We study the main doctrine of all these thinkers. The first part introduces Plato and his predecessors. In Part 2 we introduce Aristotle and its successors. What is virtue and how to teach it? What is teaching, and how can we gain knowledge? Socrates provides a geometric course designed to show that learning is memory. Why do we have to act fairly? How does it affect us? A meticulous metaphor between the city and the human soul is designed to convince us that even though the criminal can escape the discovery, he will absolutely not commit a crime The definition of Plato's justice is somewhat different from what we thought when we considered it. It is the most abstract virtue. Basically, justice is the way between selfless and selfishness. Plato believes that although people should pursue their own desires, it is important to help people around them prosper. Aristotle spent a lot of time on happiness. He believes that happiness is the goal of life and is realized through the virtue of life. People cultivate their own good habits and live by acquiring new customs. This will allow people to make the right choice and live a happy life. Essential justice of Socrates, Plato and justice is often considered an important virtue. It is regarded as a truly free and fair society and a sign of moral conscious. Ordinary people sometimes consider justice as a country where crime is not universal, regarded as a country where individuals are fair and understand each other. - Keleah Johnson Greto PY 317 October 10, 2014 Comparison and comparison Many philosophers are known for their position and belief. Plato and Aristotle are the most famous philosophers. Plato was a student of Socrates and Aristotle's teacher once. That is why both Plato and Aristotle cover most of the same problem topic, and that there is direct contrast between themes and similarities. The Greeks believe that justice is a virtue in action and therefore virtue. The concept of justice in Greece is the virtue of the soul and injustice. For Plato and Aristotle, justice means goodness and willingness to comply with the law. It means correspondence between rights and obligations. Justice is ideal for interpersonal relationships. And motivate people in the proper performance of their duties. Promoting balance and harmony between ideas and behavior is a very social nature. Nature is the source of the law and the responsibility of the state is often considered to be more applicable than the creation of the law. Indeed, Aristotle and Plato's justice are in a complementary relationship The purpose of these two philosophers is to find the principle of the ability to establish unity, harmony, virtue and happiness in society. But despite this mutual agreement, they differ in many fundamental respects.

Plato and Socrates compare Plato is one of the most important and creative thinkers of the ancient world. Born in Athens in 428 BC, he was a noble and wealthy family. Because his father Ariston is the last king of Athens, Plato is very familiar with political life since childhood. Arloston died when Plato was young. However, under the oligopoly of thirty tyrants and restored democracy, the excessive political life in Athens seems to force him to give up his ambitions for every political life. In this article, we compare and contrast the concept of citizenship between Plato and Aristotle by first giving the definition of citizenship. Let us compare and contrast ideas of Plato and Aristotle's citizens by discussing ideal conditions, social roles, humanities education, and fair society. In order to understand the concept of citizenship of Plato and Aristotle, we must first understand the definition of citizenship. The precise definition of citizenship is highly controversial. The general definition of citizenship is "right to participate in politics and represent politics" (John Baylis, 2011, p. The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle.

Socrates and Plato: an important philosopher of ancient Greece "Unmodified life is not worth" Socrates, a famous quote that Socrates claims, is a controversial philosopher in ancient Athens. He believes that anyone can lead important and meaningful existence by examining their lives and thoughts very thoroughly. (Soccio) Socrates was wise about the fact that he never accepted "truth" to him, and he did not receive any obvious evidence to support it. It would be difficult to talk about Plato without talking about Socrates It would be difficult to talk about Socrates without speaking about Plato. Socrates is the protagonist of Plato's early dialogue, Plato's teacher, his most famous work "Republic". As Socrates does not write anything, our opinion about who he is, and about his ideas comes from Plato. Our understanding of Socrates is primarily as a literary figure. Plato used his earlier philosophical work as a dialogue, so I saw that Socrates' version was given a life, which is Plato's version. Historians claim that Socrates was gathered from the works of Plato (a student of Socrates) as Socrates' teachings have never been recorded or written. Plato is one of Socrates' most famous students, his inspiration arises from the implementation of the moral meaning of Socrates and continues to spread wisdom. Plato's student Aristotle is a famous philosopher who respects and accepts the beliefs of Plato and Socrates. It is now clear that Socrates had an influence Plato is the most famous disciple of Socrates, and the majority of Socrates 'understanding is largely related to Plato' s Socrates. Plato was born in 427 BC. He is one of the most politically influential families in Athens, Ariston and the son of Perisci. His brothers are Glaucon and Adeimantus, they are major interlocutors in most areas of the Socrates Republic. Socrates did not appear in all Plato conversations, but he occupied the majority of roles, and they often played a major dialogueist who promoted the dialogue.

The open discovery of Phaedo Plato 's Faedo in Plato discovered that Socrates protects his philosophical life. Given the status of Greek philosophy at the end of the 5th century BC, this defense seems unnecessary and difficult. It is because ancient Greece provided us the origin of philosophy, but the special period of this history can prove the disgust and persecution of the general public. Several philosophers, including Pythagoras, Anakusagoras, Protagoras, were laughed at their creeds and attacked. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Plato was born in an aristocratic family of Athens in Greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, was thought of as the descendant of the early king of Athens, and his mother Perictione married Pyrilampes. When young, Plato is always interested in political leadership and eventually becomes a disciple of Socrates. He follows his philosophy and dialectic, and it is believed to pursue the truth through questions, answers and other questions. After witnessing the death of Socrates in the hands of the Athenian Democrat in 399 BC, Plato left Athens and continued his trip to Italy, Sicily and Egypt. Reasons why I chose: Scientific genius of Einstein, Darwin, Newton, and Galileo. The basic philosophy of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle is the cornerstone of Western civilization. Da Vinci and Maimonides have extraordinary abilities to pursue an interdisciplinary spirit. King Solomon's wisdom and women's "international mystery". Finally, Al Ma'arri, Spinoza (Darwin, Galileo, Socrates) has the courage to stick to their own thoughts despite the serious impact of public contempt on death. Finally, I summarize the main points explained in this article. These are very easily integrated into Plato's genius. Its purpose is to emphasize the main reason Plato object to democracy. Plato's claim is shaped by his wonderful idea and another point of his creative genius is shaped by the world in which he lives. There is the possibility of creating a chaotic and disorderly society, which ultimately leads to tyranny, there is a decline in motivation for governance. Second, Plato believes that democratic means of choosing leaders in the world to which social classes and groups belong is not a fertile basis for nurturing an ideal leader. Finally, Plato believes that leaders should be trained for leadership purposes from a young age. Genius Geography, Eric Weiner. Plato once said that "the honor of a certain country has been cultivated there." For teachers, coaches, managers, or anyone who can build other high-quality cultures, you need to read it. In addition, the text of Weiner is very interesting and belongs to his own league. Grit, Angela Duckworth. Talent x effort = skills and skills x effort = achievement. Duckworth says that what matters to us is not nature or cultivation, but cultivating our nature. Being able to stick and stick there is like Duckworth's so-called "grit". She received the MacArthur Genius Award for her research.

The concept of Plato's shape and physics is a very interesting topic. I think Plato's views on forms and physical reality are very similar. Plato said in this reality of our lives, nothing is perfect. Morphology is the perfect ideal or idea that we are striving to achieve in our lives. Plato is impossible to achieve shape in our current reality and our soul leaves our body and we are in the next area we can shape or obtain He said he could achieve complete knowledge and truth only after entering. In his Dialogue Republic (508e2-3), Plato explained the "form of goodness" through the role of Socrates, more precisely the concept of goodness (ἡτοῦῦγαθοῦῦδέα). Plato introduced several formats to his work, but determined the format of good as the highest level. This format allows philosophers to proceed to philosophical kings in training. It can not be seen or explained explicitly, but once it is identified it makes it possible for people to execute formats of all other formats. Plato believes that a true philosopher understands its form and understands and understands the form of good. In the formal hierarchy of Plato, the form of good is the highest, the highest reality. It is the root and uniformity of all other forms, so if you clarify them and understand the form of good, they will be able to understand all forms. In the case of Plato's cave, "goodness" is the source of all objects discovered on the ground by the sun, that is, the escaped prisoners. The sun makes everything on the ground visible so that the shape of good can understand all other forms. According to Plato's formal theory, the substance itself is considered to be special. In the case of Plato, the form is more realistic than the object imitating them. The shape is eternal, but the physical form of the shape is constantly changing. If the form is unqualified, the physical object is qualified and conditional. According to Plato, shape is the essence of various things. A form is the quality of an object that needs to be treated as an object of that type. For example, there are countless chairs in the world, but "the shape of the chair" is the core of every chair. Plato believes that the formal world is beyond our own world, the material world which is the necessary foundation of reality. Aristotle is a disciple of Plato at his college. Aristotle, Plato agreed that the object has a form associated with them and said that the form said it is eternal, ignoring Plato's claim that the form is independent of matter (objects) To do. Aristotle believes there is no purpose, how does a form exist? According to him, shapes and materials coexist and can not be separated from one another. At the time, "atomist" (philosopher democritus was a pioneer) can also be called a pure materialist. Aristotle also objected to their view. As you know, Plato and Atomist have two extreme points Aristotle tries to find a middlemen by compromising between them. He believes that the material world is as important as shape, so it is worth studying it.

It is education that many of us regard as generic in developed countries. We went to school very early, and most of us were in our early twenties. This is a common part of our lives, and we are not aware of how lucky it is for us to access education. People in countries like the US often go to school, but not everyone is very lucky. Especially in the Middle East many people are not allowed to go to school. Utopia is a society where everyone can receive equal education. This is different from Plato's education system, which has different levels of education for each class. In Plato's Republic, each class is educated and respects specific goals. For example, rulers are educated as rulers and guardians are educated as guardians. Therefore, their education is subject to review. As Socrates said, "If we remove all the clauses similar to these, we will ask Homer and the other poet not to be angry ... ... not free but slavery People must fear "(Plato 62). Plato calls for "art education", but he limits the art he teaches to those who have intentional art (Plato 71) The Republic of Plato is best known for the ultimate justification of justice, but it also includes an equally strong defense of philosophy education. However, due to the complexity of the dialogue, Plato's belief in education is difficult to tell. Socrates (Dialogue's Platform Mouthpiece) not only proposed two different educational visions (the first is warrior guardian education, the second is philosopher - king's education), he is also more subtle Educational instructions to provide his teaching methods were used in Glaucon and Adeimantus. The dramatic background of the dialogue makes it difficult to grasp all aspects of the Republic, which is also the key to deciding and understanding the true vision of Socratic Education from the viewpoint of education. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the book 'Republic'. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. Socrates, the seventh republic book, told Socrates that he was an interlocutor of him, imagining a group of prisoners trapped together as they were children of underground caves. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said:

The Republic of Plato explores the meaning of justice from a personal and social point of view. I am also studying how to integrate justice into human society, that is, how to create an ideal state of social order in society. This is accomplished through various dialogues and controversies between Socrates and other people. In this process, Socrates conducted a detailed analysis of the ideal nation's formation, structure and organization, thus proving the intrinsic value of the righteous as a society and the virtue that everyone must have. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. In Plato's work "Republic" there is a question as to whether the existence exists systematically. Because the Republic itself is an attempt to answer questions about human behavior, that is justice. In order to solve the problem of justice, Plato considers the relationship between the ideal city state, the autonomous collective unit, and the realization of the structure and justice of the republic. Plato thinks that the philosopher's king ought to be the ruler, as all philosophers are trying to find an ideal city state. "Calipolis" or a beautiful city is a legitimate city, political control depends on knowledge, the philosopher's king owns not power but power. In theory, it would be ideal if republics and modern states were dominated by knowledge rather than power, power is extremely important in the composition of political activities. This is a flaw in the discussion of Plato, which will be discussed in this paper. At the same time, some features of contemporary countries are consistent with an ideal city city that is inevitable.

Dialogue between Plato and Aristotle 2 When students entered the university auditorium, the first thing I noticed was that the two professors stood in front of the room. It is when the first professor came to the stage to lecture after all the students sat. Plato: Good morning. Student: Good morning professor. Plato: Many of you may know who I am, and some people do not know. For those who do not know who I am, my name is Plato. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. Aristotle is a disciple of Plato at his college. Aristotle, Plato agreed that the object has a form associated with them and said that the form said it is eternal, ignoring Plato's claim that the form is independent of matter (objects) To do. Aristotle believes there is no purpose, how does a form exist? According to him, shapes and materials coexist and can not be separated from one another. At the time, "atomist" (philosopher democritus was a pioneer) can also be called a pure materialist. Aristotle also objected to their view. As you know, Plato and Atomist have two extreme points Aristotle tries to find a middlemen by compromising between them. He believes that the material world is as important as shape, so it is worth studying it.

Comparing Aristotle and Plato Aristotle believes that an alliance between men and women must be called in order to form a city state. Later, the family must be introduced to form a village with other families, and the village gathers to form a city state. This theory is Aristotle's natural view that individuals can not be self-sufficient, and Plato thinks that a city state is necessary to achieve absolute justice. In the Republic, Plato is based on philosopher's idea. When comparing Aristotle and Plato, there are two excellent philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great people, and their ideas have not been forgotten for years. Although their political thoughts are similar, I found that there are some differences in their teachings. These ideas began with Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Plaist is based on abstract reasonable moral knowledge, but Aristotle is based on experience and is trying to apply it more to specific lives. Today, many people respect these two lifestyles ... Even friends, enemies, and even families are growing for the people of all walks everyday. Do not agree, cause conflicts, fight for what we believe. This is part of the human nature even if it means entering other people's toes. Reflecting on the complexity of Aristotle dates back to 335 BC, when I wrote poetry - the earliest work of drama theory - which survived. In this article, we compare and contrast the concept of citizenship between Plato and Aristotle by first giving the definition of citizenship. Let us compare and contrast ideas of Plato and Aristotle's citizens by discussing ideal conditions, social roles, humanities education, and fair society. In order to understand the concept of citizenship of Plato and Aristotle, we must first understand the definition of citizenship. The precise definition of citizenship is highly controversial. The general definition of citizenship is "right to participate in politics and represent politics" (John Baylis, 2011, p. The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle.

In the first volume of the Republic of Plato, Trasimachus believes that morality is an advantage of the strong. To support his view, Thrasymachus initially claims that the government as a stronger party passed the law at all times according to its own interests, then claimed that the subject must always comply with these laws Did. Socrates discussed two sets of counterarguments. First, by distinguishing clear and practical benefits as stronger, Socrates believes that it is sometimes not the actual benefit of the ruler that the subject is subject to law. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

For Greeks, philosophy is limited to abstracts as well as to their natural sciences. Thus, their philosophers are also their scientists. It is two basic questions that they want to answer, such as how to know the nature of reality and reality. Pythagoras and Plato are two natural philosophers trying to explain these universal principles. Pythagoras believes that everything is explained and represented by a mathematical formula. Plato, the most important disciple of Socrates, thinks that the world can be divided into two areas that can be seen and understood. Numanius accepted Pythagoras and Plato as two authorities to be followed by philosophy, but he believed Plato's authority would follow the authority of Pythagoras, and he believed that Pythagoras is the source of all real philosophy It includes Plato's own philosophy. For Numanius, Plato only wrote many philosophical works, and Pythagoras' view was originally only verbally conveyed. Herakley's close-up surviving pieces show that everything is constantly changing or becoming. The image of his river, the changing waters are well known. According to the old tradition of Diogenes La artius, Plato accepted these ideas through Heraclitus's disciple Cratylus. Although Socrates directly influenced Plato's relevance in the dialogue, the influence of Pythagoras on Plato seems to be an important argument in the philosophical literature. Pythagoras, more widely Pythagoras, has been said to have had a significant influence on Plato's work. According to RM Hare, this effect includes three points. so. (2) There is evidence that Plato might have came to this view from Pythagoras: Mathematics and, in general, abstract thinking is a safe basis for philosophical thinking and "substantive discussion in science and morality" . (3) Plato and Pythagoras shared "the mysterious way of the soul and its position in the material world". Both can be affected by Orphism

Plato's view is different from many other countries. He said that they were wrong because they were born to be evil, because they do not know what is best for them. Good things are good, but I do not know well the unpleasant things, so I have a wrong idea. He said that good people know what is good and those who are not good do not know how good they are. Plato believes that modern society erroneously believes that they are explanations of good and happiness. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. When you compare the philosophical views of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, it is important to distinguish historical Socrates from Plato's Socrates. Socrates does not write anything by himself. Instead, Plato recorded the lives of Socrates in a dialogue. When you read most of Plato's work, it will look like a drama. With the passage of time after the death of Socrates, Plato's Socrates is not like a more historical Socrates like Plato. Historic Socrates was written by another Greek, Xenophan. Many scholars believe Plato 's death - apology, Krito, Fado and Itfero - in Socrates' dialogue are more accurate than depicting historical Socrates in some other works. Our understanding of Socrates is that he was seriously affected by Pythagoras, he was a monotheist - this caused accusations of other Greek heretics - by the Greeks Execution was a threat to society Historians claim that Socrates was gathered from the works of Plato (a student of Socrates) as Socrates' teachings have never been recorded or written. Plato is one of Socrates' most famous students, his inspiration arises from the implementation of the moral meaning of Socrates and continues to spread wisdom. Plato's student Aristotle is a famous philosopher who respects and accepts the beliefs of Plato and Socrates. It is now clear that Socrates had an influence

At these meetings, I better understood Aristotle and Plato's thinking and theory. In particular, I am particularly interested in Aristotle and the two extreme concepts and aim for "gray or the middle of the way". I am also interested in Plato's theory about the effects of justice and injustice and their behavior. Aristotle is working hard to understand that life is the best of the two worlds. He tried to define the median value of the available lifetime. In that regard, Aristotle was born in St. Kitts in Macedonia in 384 BC, and died in Euboea, Greece in 22 B.C. Like Plato, Aristotle is an ancient Greek philosopher and Aristotle is a Plato student. At the age of 18, he entered Plato University in Athens and stayed until the age of 37 (347 BC). His work covers many fields including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, linguistics, political science and government . The first comprehensive system of Western philosophy. Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. The previous question was not answered by Plato's theory. Aristotle rejected Plato's method of division. But Aristotle denied Platonic doctrine, too. According to metaphysics (1, 9), the shape of Plato can not explain eternity and world order. More importantly, he believes Plato's formal theory can not explain anything in our material world. Attributes of the table (according to Plato's format, eternal, immutable, transcendental etc.) are not compatible with material objects, the metaphor of participation and imitation is often broken. For example, it is unclear how a white object participates or copies on a white form. In other words, it is difficult to understand the relationship between the white figure and the white object itself.

The philosophical idea associated with Plato and the Parthenon Platon Platon contains whether or not the structure is an element of the world that can be understood whether the structure is an element of the visible world. In my opinion, Plato sees the Parthenon as an object in the visible world. The Parthenon temple is a tangible monument in our real world. The Parthenon Temple is a building project that includes science and mathematics. Plato's scientific and mathematical views are classified as world-understandable forms. The Parthenon temple is an ancient Greek temple dedicated to the goddess Athena Partenos. The Parthenon Temple is now ruined, but it is still a masterpiece of Greek architecture. It took 15 years to build the Parthenon, and the Parthenon temple was built under the guidance of the pellicle. Greek artist Fidias supervised the design of the Parthenon temple. The Parthenon temple is a huge rectangular marble temple with 17 pillars on each side and 8 pillars at both ends. It is about 31 x 70 meters in size. The central part of the Parthenon is a room with two rooms separated by walls. Each room can be accessed from the pouch facing the pillar. There is an image of Athena in the room 1) The Parthenon Temple was built to replace the temple of Athena that was famous at that time. The structure of Parthenon consists of a rectangular floor with a series of lower steps on both sides, and columns of columns extend around the building. There are multiple entries, and six entries are added to the top of each entry. The Parthenon temple has two large rooms. The larger one of the two interiors is called "The Naos" and there is an image inside. - Regardless of whether the standard, whether it is a classroom paper, architect scientific interview, or urban architecture, everything exists to comply with a particular format of standards. Standards are the principle of modeling informing things to survive. From local building standards to LEED, building standards are defined and redefined everyday. This will help build a community and lead a more progressive lifestyle.

Niccolio Machiavelli (born May 3, 1469 - Italy, Florence, 1527) His writings are controversial among scholars; and for the ambiguity in the analogy of "political essence" The meaning of morality. The prince was criticized for his seemingly immoral political clue, but after further consideration of other works such as "discourse", one would argue that Machiavelli's intention actually meant positive political ethics You can do. Comparing the history of Machiavelli's prince and the Republic of Plato, many people write about ideal rulers and countries and how to maintain them. Perhaps the most noticed and compared are Prince and Machiavelli of Plato in the Republic. Machiavelli lives in the era of political destruction in Italy. Prince's writing is to explain how the leader acquires and maintains power. In Plato's "Republic", he revealed the definition of justice. - I believe that the advice for the prince of Machiavelli and the prince of Martha Stewart Machiavelli is the ideal choice for Italian rulers of the 16th century, because Machiavelli understands the motivation of most politicians . Machiavelli's theory is based on a perfect example of history. Machiavelli honestly believes that his proposal is extremely important for his main wish, Italy's reunification. Machiavelli said that in an ideal world the prince will be kind and moral. Despite the differences in motivation of rulers, Plato and Machiavelli have a common understanding of the nature of the masses lacking wisdom and being enslaved by their property. One of the main recommendations to the prince of Machiavelli is not to touch the man's wealth or wife. He did not give his prince the same philosophical level as Pluto 's guardian, but he was not ruled by Plato' s appetite soul, and he did not worship his property. He may be closest to the helper, he is a militant, he is not subordinate to anyone, but he is loved by honor and courage. He did not offer an ideological structure to make the Prince understand himself, but Machiavelli gives the prince the opportunity to imply a unified Italy long-term goal that gives the prince some purpose and reason, and gives him the opportunity to participate in all operations It seemed necessary. Practical training

Greek philosopher Plato is considered to be one of the greatest thinkers in history and is called by scholars as "the source of all Western thought." In his book "Republic" he outlines the perfect state of the city and how it works. Along the way of his reason, he did not try to conceal his contempt for other political systems. This includes democracy, a system he seems not to agree. In fact, from what I read, Plato clearly opposes democracy and its principles. There are many ways to explain the relationship between Plato and classical aesthetics. The political regime outlined in the Republic shows justice in terms of partial and overall relations. Plato, however, is undoubtedly against classical culture and the explanation of the beauty expressed in the "seminar" - presumably the key to the concept of neoplatonism and idealistic beauty - the text of Socrates - expresses the desire for beauty It is a perfect match. At the drinking party, Socrates talks to his teacher the teachings of Diotima in love. She associates the beauty of the experience with the desire to erode or copy it (Plato, 558-59). But the desire to copy it is linked to the desire for immortality or eternity. Because this is a dead and eternal factor in our mortality rate. Plato uses "people of democracy" to represent democracy. Democrats are the sons of the oligarchy regime. Unlike his father, Democrats are swallowed by unnecessary desire. Plato expresses the necessary desire as our instinctive desire or survival desire. Unnecessary desire is the desire to teach themselves to resist, such as the desire for wealth. Democrats are interested in everything he buys with money. Whenever you want to do anything what he wants. His life does not have order and precedence

Plato believes that justice people can be associated with justice society; they both function in the same way. Social justice arises when each member of society plays a role that its nature is best suited to you. Personal or moral justice happens when an individual adjusts and balances all his factors. Plato's perception of a legitimate society and a legitimate individual is a desire for the benefit of the whole person. All of these ideas link Plato's ideal republic. In this article, we compare and contrast the concept of citizenship between Plato and Aristotle by first giving the definition of citizenship. Let us compare and contrast ideas of Plato and Aristotle's citizens by discussing ideal conditions, social roles, humanities education, and fair society. In order to understand the concept of citizenship of Plato and Aristotle, we must first understand the definition of citizenship. The precise definition of citizenship is highly controversial. The general definition of citizenship is "right to participate in politics and represent politics" (John Baylis, 2011, p. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. When talking about ancient Greek, the first ideas were Plato and Aristotle. These two names are the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have almost always to say. Ethics, politics, science, science, mathematics, geometry etc. are all interested in this topic. Plato is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece, born at Stadix in Athens City in 424 BC, died in 348 BC. At the same time, Plato is also a student of Socrates. Plato founded the academy, the first higher education institution in Western Europe, in Athens.

From the beginning, the law was quickly different from other platonic conversations. The role of Socrates has gradually lost its importance in the recognized timetable of the dialogue, but "law" was the only Platonic dialogue he did not show up. An unknown Athenian stranger, widely believed to represent Platon himself, replaced his position. Strangers from Athens joined Sparta Megillus and Crete Island Krinias and they spent a long time discussing the law. As usual, the choice of Plato's role is symbolic; Megillus represents the political principle of Sparta, and Cleinias represents the principles of Athens. The ritual - the concept of an iconic preface - is first detailed in Plato's law. Plato argues that the introductory text is intended to convince people why the law is morally good. With Plato's work, the law is aimed at building a self-control society, so the law must be kind. This virtue is based on the preface - the soul of the law - and people have established a tone of freedom to comply with the law. Legislators "sell" legislation to people through this means. As Plato insists: 53 The concept of Plato's preface is aimed to prove the legitimacy of the law. A good preamble will convince people to comply with the law, not because of civil sanctions or criminal sanctions, but because it is a good law. The purpose of the preface is to reduce the severity of the law, an unpersistent law of preamble is "dictatorship". Plato's preface uses abstract terms to cite poetic ideals. However, they are not considered part of the law and do not create interpretive rights or binding power. Is the preface meaningful? They will definitely do this. For Plato, the preface is the soul of the law, and lawmakers use this method to persuade people to follow the law. For Schmidt, the preface shows basic social political decisions. For Blackstone, the preface is the key to exposing ideas to legislators. For the individual, the foreword is the public consciousness and they define the constitutional identity, so they define who we are. For a long time the preface was regarded as a symbolic statement. American law school students never learn from the preface to understand that they can win the lawsuit. From the global point of view, this article shows that this premise is no longer valid. More and more countries are legalizing the language of the preamble. The rights and principles of the preamble are increasingly enforced by law and lawyers can file a lawsuit (this is an ideal way, but another issue). Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3

In ancient Greece women were seen as many things. In any case, they are not considered comparable to men. Women are often expressed as being managed as being in compliance. They play a supplementary or secondary role in life and men often ask their wives, but they hope that they will stick with their hopes. Unlike most Greek women, Medea plays a central role in this story, but she shows many differences from other Greek women. Behavioral and psychological patterns Greek myths give us a dramatic and powerful story of extremist individualism; antigones like Sophocles, rebellious women, and Eurasian media and Plato's "Apologies of Socrates". Even if such a challenge means death and suffering, this story is to challenge the absolute power of the state. As a tragic personality, these extraordinary, unusual people become prototypes, models and define the transfiguration meaning of love and death between individuals and the state. In the worst case, please look at Young Guns in return. When individualism is doubtful or cautious, we get guns and mirrors The Greek tragedy, Meudia of Euripides is a woman who mocks the story and her witty revenge. In the days of Medea, society often made women obedient. However, the drama "Medea" challenged the traditional custom of Greece. Euripides considers disqualification and rebellion of Medea as a means of criticizing the treatment of ancient Greek women. After reading Medea with Euripides, it was discovered that Medea has widespread features for women. The selfish nature of meda and the nature of self-righteousness are aspects of that she does not meet the traditional Greek standards. Traditionally women can only be divided into two roles: mother and wife, more than that. Medea despises gender recognition by showing male and female characteristics. Sometimes she separates herself from the "female" mood and implements society's inability to see what women can do, which further demonstrates the ability to adapt to a variety of situations. Medea (31 December 1969) at MegaEssays.com. Search from 15:17 on October 13, 2018 from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/74483.html.

Modern science is directly from philosophy, or it is closely related to multiple philosophical issues. Understanding philosophy and understanding how philosophers solve problems is the key to understanding science as we know today and in the future. There are as many definitions of philosophy as the definition of philosopher. Philosophy is said to be the mother of all fields. It is also the oldest field in all fields and promotes modern science, including social and natural conclusions. Humanity is the sum of our species identity, human identity, spirit, human spiritual, physical and mental characteristics. Plato and Aristotle depict humanity with different definitions and features; Plato emphasizes psychological / spiritual characteristics, arguing that Aristotle can not separate the mind and body. Since then, the definition has been split among people who believe the body is part of the human nature and those who believe the body is predominantly a human container. Thinkers like Aristotle, Darwin, Sartre, Lyle are thinking about the world and the body. Link together - often called spiritual, essential or mindful The introduction of Aristotle's natural person theory and Hobbes natural person theory is placed in the novel's characters. Aristotle advocated two important ideas in his "humanity" theory. The first idea is the human character of a person, including the characteristics of the mind and the body, which is the development of the excellence of meditation. The second part of this theory is Aristotle's view that meditative life is the foundation of a truly beautiful life. This includes his views on humans. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

The long-standing argument of Plato and Machiavelli in human history is what is the best way to deal with power and to rule it. Who should have power, how to keep one rule, and the purpose of service of the government is always the premise of civilization and has caused disputes and conflicts more than once. Due to the fundamental elements of control, humans need order and structure to resist human desire for freedom, and the compromise between them has never been easier. Comparing the history of Machiavelli's prince and the Republic of Plato, many people write about ideal rulers and countries and how to maintain them. Perhaps the most noticed and compared are Prince and Machiavelli of Plato in the Republic. Machiavelli lives in the era of political destruction in Italy. Prince's writing is to explain how the leader acquires and maintains power. In Plato's "Republic", he revealed the definition of justice. - I believe that the advice for the prince of Machiavelli and the prince of Martha Stewart Machiavelli is the ideal choice for Italian rulers of the 16th century, because Machiavelli understands the motivation of most politicians . Machiavelli's theory is based on a perfect example of history. Machiavelli honestly believes that his proposal is extremely important for his main wish, Italy's reunification. Machiavelli said that in an ideal world the prince will be kind and moral. Despite the differences in motivation of rulers, Plato and Machiavelli have a common understanding of the nature of the masses lacking wisdom and being enslaved by their property. One of the main recommendations to the prince of Machiavelli is not to touch the man's wealth or wife. He did not give his prince the same philosophical level as Pluto 's guardian, but he was not ruled by Plato' s appetite soul, and he did not worship his property. He may be closest to the helper, he is a militant, he is not subordinate to anyone, but he is loved by honor and courage. He did not offer an ideological structure to make the Prince understand himself, but Machiavelli gives the prince the opportunity to imply a unified Italy long-term goal that gives the prince some purpose and reason, and gives him the opportunity to participate in all operations It seemed necessary. Practical training

At the time, Plato and Aristotle were very influential people, bringing abundant knowledge to the world. To be honest, in democracy, but I think that there are many advantages, there are a common side effects are a number. In all of the important thought of Plato, his most good idea, democracy for the majority of people can not think about the community is that making a political decision. On the other hand, Aristotle because it is a very optimistic about democracy, comparison of the comparison and men has become very interesting. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Socrates is a classic Greek philosopher and feature of the book of Faedo, philosophers are most enthusiastic about acquiring knowledge and are not afraid of death and separation of body and soul, but are welcomed We are defining it as a person. Even in his last days, Socrates was pursuing knowledge, and he proposed a theory to strengthen the immortal debate of his soul. His attempt to discuss his view is not necessarily considered convincing evidence to support the existence of immortal soul. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal.

"His" Socratic method "involves asking questions, especially pursuit of definition" (Sacks). The purpose of presenting a series of questions is asking people to think about it, and the series of answers, thoughts, and ethics that accompany it. In addition, based on the information provided in Socrates' life, he can infer that he is very humble and selfless. Unlike many other philosophers, Socrates never accepts money or exchanges for what he teaches; his goal is to prepare his students to be independent and maintain their public offices It is that. Neopra Tonism is a religious philosophy school based on the teachings of Plato founded in the third century AD. Neoplatinics accepted Plato's central view that the ultimate reality (or the only real existence) is a form rather than a subject of everyday life. The shape is an eternal, perfect ideal of that thing, while objects of sensation (we can discern it) are incomplete copies. In aesthetics, sublimation is a wonderful or vast quality that transcends calculation, comparison or imitation. This quality is usually quoted on nature. Sublimation as a concept of natural aesthetic quality is different from the beauty originally developed in the 18th century. British philosopher Edmund Burke was the first thinker to think that sublimation and beauty are incompatible. Bark said that even if the soul is anything, or even if it creates a feeling of fear among them, the imagination points to elevation. Immanuel Kant said this sublimation "absolutely wonderful". Protinus refers to tradition as a way to interpret Plato's intentions. It is easy for outsiders to misunderstand the meaning of Plato, as Plato's teaching is not for the general public but for university members. However, Protino tells how university philosophers achieved the same conclusion as the subject of his criticism (eg, eroticism of God's answer to the evil problem, or a bad mood) I tried to clarify. For Christians, the other world is heaven and it is enjoying after death; for platonists it is the world of eternal thinking, the real world, not the fantastic appearance. Christian theologians combine these ideas to embody the majority of Protino's philosophy. Therefore, Protinus has important historical significance in shaping medieval Christianity and Catholic theology.

Furthermore, even if he made multiple beds, it was just a replica. The quality of the bed made by the carpenter is similar, but it only imitates a certain bed. The painter's bed is purely a copy of a carpenter's product. Then, since they are the third things removed from nature, the painter is condemned as a mimic of what was created by others. Plato said the picture looks different but there is no difference, but that said it imitates the illusion. Imitation / expression / imitation, self presentation. The philosophical concept of Plato, Aristotle in the Republic is discussed in poetry and others. For Plato and Aristotle, this is an important feature of poetry, but they have different opinions about it. For Plato, this is a denial. Because a poem can neither describe truth nor teach morality. It is irrational - it is based on inspiration and knowledge. Therefore, poetry should be banned as it only keeps us away from the truth. Aristotle believes that this imitation is positive, as it is a passive copy, not a passive copy, but a creative act to express the universal truth about nature. Poetry is a response to Aristotle's teacher Plato, he pointed out that in 'Republic' poetry is simply an apparent representative, hence misleading and morally skeptical. Aristotle's attitude toward poetry is quite different from that of Plato. Aristotle focuses on the intellectual task of carefully considering the characteristics of each "species" of the text, treating the texts of the sentences as natural scientists, forming categories and putting them together in a coherent system It was. Like Plato, Aristotle tries to explain the social function and moral utility of art, rather than thinking that the poet should be expelled from perfect society.

At the beginning of the first volume of the Republic of Plato, we will introduce the narrator, Socrates and his companion. But through Polemarchus and others' claims, they understand the special charm of Socrates and gifts of intellectuals. Intonation is arbitrary, language and expression are very simple as in Plato's dialogue. But Plato's unaffected style has at least two objectives. On the one hand it matches Socrates' own unique irony that attracts "fools" by impersonating ignorance, because it obscures the complexity and height of thinking, then the master can prove what he did Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is quite different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

He insists that there are many sacred acts besides religious opponents persecuting. Likewise, he often cites gods quarreling among them. Therefore, they agree on different things. Therefore, Socrates believes that there is no intrinsic understanding of sanctity among different individuals (Plato. & Gallop, 1997). In the second attempt, Eu thyphro believed that sanctity was recognized by all the gods. But Socrates believes that sacredness and what God recognizes can not be the same. Euthyphro is a work by Plato written in the form of a dialogue between a man named Socrates and Euthyphro, a teacher of Plato. The purpose of this work is to examine and define the meaning of godliness and sanctity. It took a couple of weeks before Socrates' famous trial, eventually forced to commit suicide by drinking a Tuga. At the beginning of the dialogue, the two men were waiting for a preliminary hearing at the Alcon Vajirus Court. Euthyphro has reached his father's claim. That worker killed a slave and his father left the worker in the groove while waiting to see what to do. Euthyphro - Plato discusses Euthyphro, Socrates and Euthyphro 's faithful / holy concept. This article not only tests your philosophical concepts and the recognition and participation ability to analysis, but also asks you to create your own definition of sanctity as a conversation participant. Read Euthyphro and write a paper to do the following. Explain how the concept of sanctity appears in a conversation, and why it occupies an important position in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. Please explain how Socrates reproached each definition of Yutoflo after introducing the three definitions used by Yutoflor according to Socrates. Please state your own argument about what Socrates is aiming for in this dialogue. How do you know that this is his goal? What features of the dialogue are consistent with your interpretation of the goal? Provide your own pious / holy definition, then create Socrates reaction / criticize your definition PLATO'S Other dialogue is a clear example of the definition of Socrates' dialogue. The concept to be defined is the concept of sanctity or godliness (z 6 r needs to be defined in the initial dialogue, Euthyphro is trying to sue his father for murder Socrates is then I am wondering if Euthyphro's piousness and obvious knowledge is sufficient to not act when sueing his father The results of the search are well known and Euthyphro's efforts are all canceled Conversation There was not enough definition of piousness at the end of.

Plato's ideal society depends on people's fair actions. In his utopia, all men and women can maximize their possibilities and in turn use their talents and skills for the benefit of all. This complete society has been criticized and criticized based on the several extreme factors it has: Plato's ideal society citizens can suppress their own interests. It is accustomed to believing that they are participating in collective efforts and choosing to follow the rule of philosopher king for all the benefits. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

The theme behind Plato's faedo "Faedo" is the desire to prepare Socrates and to die for his belief in immortality. Socrates believes that his soul will always leave the form there when his body no longer exists. Socrates is convinced that he is not only afraid of his death, but also welcomes it. He believes that it can truly understand and gain all knowledge only when the soul is away from the body. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

The introduction of the Republic began in 508 BC and continued for 483 years. Praetor's office appeared in 367 BC. The role of the ruling party is to support the Civil Code by giving the right to sue in the execution of civil litigation, and to help consular conduct daily trial. After 30 years BC 242 BC, a new consular was added, so there were two consular officers. Urbanists have the power to decide events and enforce the law among Roman citizens, but Peregrinus considers to handle cases between citizens and foreigners, and foreigners Hmm. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC) As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Let's start from Plato Republic where we started. The first starting point of political philosophy may be a republic. Plato's theory of justice and thought represents the political and ideological paradigm of the next century. In his masterpiece, Plato shows that there is an important relationship between political life and the ideal form of intangible realm. Plato's city state is a physical expression of the permanent form of justice that exists in this invisible field. In other words, Plato has a metaphysical paradigm with a political system. Likewise, there is a metaphysical justice paradigm which is the trajectory of justice that determines the shape of justice city and individual of justice. According to Plato, the function and purpose of the ideal ruler philosopher king is to shape and rule the city according to the form of justice.

Plato's ambiguity for centuries, Plato has always been regarded as a writer, master of rhetoric, artist, and most importantly a philosopher. But Plato's sophistication and opposition to art brought confusion to his thoughts and beliefs. John Phakos plays about Plato, "[F] or most rhetoric plato always plays the same role he gave to his boss - enemy" (Nienkamp 1) Plato always skillful against rhetoric and art It seems like a rhetoric or an artist. & Lt; Tab / & gt; When addressing these issues, it is clear that Phaedo's page has no clear conclusion. One of the reasons is linguistic, chance of language, and ambiguity of Plato's own ideas. Should we consider the concept of shape as a hypothesis? This book has no answer. Conversely, when analyzing other works of Plato, we can resolve ambiguity by paying special attention to analysis of form related slopes and Greek manuscripts. Of course, this is beyond the obscure range of this article. The shape of Plato and how we look at them seems to be truly part of this material world, it will always be changing and will never change. According to Plato's formal theory, the substance itself is considered to be special. In the case of Plato, the form is more realistic than the object imitating them. The shape is eternal, but the physical form of the shape is constantly changing. If the form is unqualified, the physical object is qualified and conditional. According to Plato, shape is the essence of various things. A form is the quality of an object that needs to be treated as an object of that type. For example, there are countless chairs in the world, but "the shape of the chair" is the core of every chair. Plato believes that the formal world is beyond our own world, the material world which is the necessary foundation of reality. Kant calls it a rational idea of ​​God, the soul, and the world (the universe). By doing so, he misused Plato's word "idea" and changed its definition to ambiguity. Plato's idea is to generate a copy of the model or standard. Copy is a visible perceptual object. Kant's rational concept is not obtained by perceptual knowledge. They are almost impossible to understand through abstract conceptual knowledge. All cosmology should come from a hypothetical triangulation theory, therefore it should come from the principle of perfect rationality. Kant argues that splitting the whole into the last part is based on the principle of justification. This is because the last part is the basic condition and the whole should be the result. But Schopenhauer argues that separatability is based on the principle of contradiction. For him, part and the whole are actually one.

Plato and Confucius today have thousands of trustworthy philosophers people have to learn, so choosing learners is a burden. Everyone has wonderful knowledge and insight, and then you can learn something. Some people do not call themselves a philosopher, but bring philosophical thinking to us, and some people devote their lives to the love of wisdom. Philosophers have existed for thousands of years, and as long as the sun rises, there will be future philosophers. Confucius, Plato Confucius and Plato are the two most historical teachers who are most respected and widely studied. Philosophical thinking on how to rule people and what characteristics should be developed for good leaders. Both ideas are good for the civilizations they live in and there are many similarities in their ideas. My view on an ideal leader is a mixture of these two ideas. - Plato and Confucius today have thousands of trustworthy philosophers people have to learn, so choosing learners is a burden. Everyone has wonderful knowledge and insight, and then you can learn something. Some people do not call themselves a philosopher, but bring philosophical thinking to us, and some people devote their lives to the love of wisdom. When you look at Confucius and Plato in bulk, it is clear that they all affect the classic era. Confucius teachings are more acceptable than Plato's dialogue, probably because the teachings of Confucius are not trying to alter the political control of the Republic of Plato. They are convinced that truth and justice will be supported through moral thinking and action. Confucius '' Confucius aleale '' method mainly focuses on self realization. In the last few thousand years, few philosophers have done detailed research like Plato (probably Aristotle and Confucius are his only equality in this regard). I will do with the enthusiasm of the Renaissance humanist, and I recently introduced the complexity of Greek grammar and prepared to settle the giant of this idea. But when thinking about Plato, our idea usually imagines a philosopher philosopher (the prince of a philosopher), we are a writer of the huge republic or eloquent poet - a philosopher apologizing (even law maintenance) However, I do not think much about Plato's so-called secondary dialogue.

When he wrote the "Republic", Plato realized that his ruler or "guardian" in Calipolis needed kindness and justice. He also realized that "imitation of young people became part of nature" (Plato, Republic, 395 d). With these two ideas in mind, Plato decided to review the poetry and the statement of parents' education. He believes that poets, playwrights, musicians, and storytellers will encourage imitating and adopting unfair and sneaky personality and customs when describing Gods and Heroes as slaves and injustices. Plato also made several discussions on the standards of music and poetry in debate about education. Like other works, Plato criticizes the ethical content of poetry and the ethical knowledge of the poet (see, eg, Laws 719A - C, 811 B - E), thoroughly investigates poetry that is permitted to enter the city (See, for example, rules 657 B, 719 B - D, 796 E - 802 E. Plato also has an ambiguous debate about the legitimacy criteria of music that it must be judged by the happiness of good people It points out (Law 659 A), and music is imitated so the right music is similar to imitating beautiful music (Law 668 AB). The Republic of Plato discussed a number of topics such as justice, music, poetry, politics etc. I felt that the discussion about music is controversial and interesting, but the argument about justice pulled my attention and brought me many thoughts. The first book of the Republic of Platte has reviewed the judiciary. The main idea of ​​the book is to remove the common but wrong idea of ​​justice and to clean up the air for the new theory. Socrates talked with Thrasymachus, Polemarchus and Cephalus and discussed the nature of justice. Throughout the discussion, you can easily see the traditional justice view Socrates wants to remove. Traditionally justice is regarded as a great virtue and everyone will be treated equally. Simply put, this is a set of rules for managing how good people should lead him or herself. However, as Socrates pointed out, we do not know why and how to benefit from this concept of justice. The next step is to examine some aspects of Socrates' decision in the context of discussing the role of poetry as a general form of expression. I'm not only interested in Socrates (and Plato) 's reasons for discovering that poetry makes it so much corrode the structure of the culture, and why the popular expressions are alienated and why. Socrates did his best to relate the poetry to other forms of thinking and expression - as mayor he was forced to expel verses and poets for more profit I can do it. By understanding the discussion about Socrates' poetry, our argument is an intervention to various impulses of free expression review.

At the beginning of Volume 4, Plato explains the virtue of a true philosopher; he rejects inequity while seeking truth and wisdom. Adeimantus argued that philosophers were not useful as described by Socrates, but Plato suggested a metaphor of ship being steered by a powerless captain without knowledge of the voyage. The captain could not drive the crew who caused the rebellion, wanted to overturn the existing pilot and steer the ship. They are obviously lacking in understanding of navigation technology, but everyone thinks he is better than others and compete for the ship's real power. Summary of special School of Hellenistic philosophy: The Stoic school was founded in Athens by Cito's Zeno in the early third century BC, but famous for Epictetus, Cato, Seneca and Marcus Aurelius. Philosophy insists that virtue (such as wisdom) is happiness, judgment is based on behavior, not words. We do not control or rely on external events but we trust only our own responses and our reactions. Surprisingly, despite the fact that many of Stoic's excellent schools have never published publications, we still can get these ideas. Kato did not do it for sure. Marcus Aurelius did not plan to meditate. Seneca letters, letters, and ideas of Epictetus came to us through students taking memos. What is short? The briefing is only a summary of the opinion of the appellate court. That's it - it's nothing more! A brief explanation is a written abstract or summary. It is just a brief explanation or explanation of the opinion. Your primary job as a law student (even if you are working as a lawyer) is to easily (ie summarize) the case. Why do you want to summarize the case? Let's say you asked a friend if she saw an old classic movie "Repa's Green Alien?" Your friend asked frankly to confess and ask that she does not remember the movie. "You can claim to go to the movies, even better, you can explain the content of the movie" easily "(it surely restores her memory), and your They can discuss the importance of the movie for your conversation. At law school you are asked to read hundreds of cases. Most of the time is not particularly memorable Descriptive title descriptions should be summarized in paragraphs 1 - 2 of the report. However, you briefly explain your professional career, investment in your whereabouts and circumstances, and your data source (the person you interviewed, the documents you collected, and the website you observed) You should. The body of the report should be written in paragraph format to form the main part of the report. It is also necessary to organize the organization focusing on the analytical questions identified in the plan. For your position in a professional writing environment, a critical discussion of how important a particular relationship is important should be divided into 2-3 descriptive heading sections related to analytic questions is.

Plato and Aristotle have a strong view on the influence of poetry and social purposes. Plato in the Republic outlined his reasons "to reject imitation poetry" (Plato is quoted in Editor Adams 1992, page 31). The reference to Plato's "poetry" does not apply to the poetry of modern society. Because it is an art of performance, not for silent reading and reflection. Julia Annas (1981, p.94) believes that Plato focuses on popular culture, a culture when children grow up; in today's environment, his focus is on novels (television and movies) . For example, the 2003 House movie House of Sand and Fog. Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. Plato's student philosopher Aristotle opposed Plato and his theory. Aristotle believes that shapes exist, but they are part of every object, and our senses finally tell us what this subject is. He is an early materialist. Plato's theory is expressed by cave fables and split line theory. Because they are very similar, Aristotle's view on this issue is quite different. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age Classical rhetoric theory is dominated by the idea of ​​Aristotle and Plato. Plato is interested in comparing the limits of the rhetoric he is seeing (dialogue topic, Gorgias, cooking and rhetoric comparison) with the ideal rhetoric limitation offered at Pbaedrus. Aristotle tends to summarize rhetorical guidance and develop a practical approach than Plato's moral perspective on this subject. Aristotle's rhetoric - in fact the editing of his student's memo on his lecture - provides the first systematic and comprehensive rhetorical thesis

Plato: The magnificence of democracy The history and evolution of the law we know has developed through various ideas and philosophies. It is the result of the operation and operation of the public relations, it seems that the appearance of a different philosophical system. Many were innovators in the field of thought of political leaders, dictators and other simple political ideals and philosophers. Through Plato's wisdom and teaching, the law has evolved into a variety of systems. Democracy is the subject of extensive research by political philosophers around the world. Plato is one of these philosophers. Plato considers "democracy is an attractive form of government full of truth and chaos, equalizing equality and inequality." Analysis of democracy and Republic of ancient Athens provides a deep understanding of the statements in that context. The sentence itself is valid, but Plato does not seem to mean what he said. - Education is not a series of classes, including a series of facts tested and forgotten. Education is a set of tools that students use every day in classrooms and real societies. English is the main language of the United States, people use it to communicate globally. However, many students find it difficult to use the language correctly. Plato: The magnificence of democracy The history and evolution of the law we know has developed through various ideas and philosophies. It is the result of the operation and operation of the public relations, it seems that the appearance of a different philosophical system. Many were innovators in the field of thought of political leaders, dictators and other simple political ideals and philosophers. - The problem I encountered two months ago was among the two tenants in my grandfather 's house. Linda is the owner of a boutique that has been doing business for eight years. She recently borrowed from the bank to expand her business. This is not the first time she borrowed from a bank She already withdrew money from the bank several times and can repay it for a long time. According to Linda, she is looking forward to expanding her business.

Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. In Philebas and Sophist, contemporary metaphysical approaches are closer, politicians and politicians are more ideal, laws more clearly state the nature and structure of the state, arts, seminars, and protagoras It is better. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the book 'Republic'. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. Socrates, the seventh republic book, told Socrates that he was an interlocutor of him, imagining a group of prisoners trapped together as they were children of underground caves. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said: The Republic of Plato adopted a series of dialogues between the first person narrator (Socrates, Plato's teacher) and various reality characters. Perhaps the most famous part of the Republic 'Fable of the Cave' is the dialogue between Socrates and Platon's brother Glaucon. In this section, Socrates tries to explain how people acquire knowledge and wisdom, and "through the metaphor," the essential form of goodness of perception "(paragraphs 31, 10). He was confined to Glaucon in the complete darkness trapped in the cave since birth and they can not move their bodies or move their heads to see what is in front of them We asked to imagine the group bundled in. Anywhere outside the wall, such walls are the only ones they know about life. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Plato and Aristotle explain the world around us. How can I understand the truth? Decades ago Plato and Aristotle started looking for answers. Surprisingly, all philosophy since then can be explained as a reinterpretation of the first argument between Plato and Aristotle. The doctrine of Plato and Aristotle is in stark contrast to the concept of reality, the knowledge of birth, and the mechanism for finding the truth. First, Plato's realistic concept is in stark contrast to Aristotle's concept. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. When talking about ancient Greek, the first ideas were Plato and Aristotle. These two names are the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Plato and Aristotle have almost always to say. Ethics, politics, science, science, mathematics, geometry etc. are all interested in this topic. Plato is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece, born at Stadix in Athens City in 424 BC, died in 348 BC. At the same time, Plato is also a student of Socrates. Plato founded the academy, the first higher education institution in Western Europe, in Athens.

Socrates first established the existence of the triad based on the ancient idea, that is, the soul of birth came from it; basically, they resurrected from death. That assertion prove that Socrates is born of death, if a living is resurrected from death, a soul must exist in that field (Phaedo 70 d). Then he extended this reason to all plants, animals and the future. Socrates uses this argument to explain this logic: "If things get smaller, it comes from something bigger and will be smaller" (Phaedo 69e). Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Today 's political society learned many lessons from Plato and Aristotle' s political philosophy. There are many different political ideologies and regimes that may be useful for one society, as in the case of ancient Greece, but in other societies it may cause complete confusion. Aristotle believes that there are "many areas of the city", so we need some political systems. (4.3.1) Many areas of the cities he mentioned mandated to establish different forms of position in each of these areas. In that regard, Aristotle was born in St. Kitts in Macedonia in 384 BC, and died in Euboea, Greece in 22 B.C. Like Plato, Aristotle is an ancient Greek philosopher and Aristotle is a Plato student. At the age of 18, he entered Plato University in Athens and stayed until the age of 37 (347 BC). His work covers many fields including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, linguistics, political science and government . The first comprehensive system of Western philosophy. Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. The previous question was not answered by Plato's theory. Aristotle rejected Plato's method of division. But Aristotle denied Platonic doctrine, too. According to metaphysics (1, 9), the shape of Plato can not explain eternity and world order. More importantly, he believes Plato's formal theory can not explain anything in our material world. Attributes of the table (according to Plato's format, eternal, immutable, transcendental etc.) are not compatible with material objects, the metaphor of participation and imitation is often broken. For example, it is unclear how a white object participates or copies on a white form. In other words, it is difficult to understand the relationship between the white figure and the white object itself.

Many literary works have offered much response to the subject of discussion. Opinions are proposed in a rhetorical way and are corroborated by several recognized facts. Plato expressed the belief in Sherry's opinion divergence and reaction to poetry, with Plato Republic and Shelly's "Defense of Poetry" in two works. Through rhetorical means such as metaphor and symbolism, using deductive logic and Socratic sentences, Plato provides powerful and highly supportive arguments, but Shelley's long structure, analogy and metaphor are weak. Sherry's work is different from Plato's work. Sherry's work is more direct because it seems to be for preaching. "Distribution is a tool of imagination as an agent, as a substance, as a substance." (429) The analogy used by Shelly depicts that the reason is the basis of imagination. The truth determined by Republic Plato is basically wrong. Sherry used a metaphor similar to a mirror like Plato. "Poetry is a mirror that changes beautiful things." (431) Shelly is trying to preserve poetry, but still represents an image like Plato. Plato used this image symbol more nicely as he insisted that what was imitated like mirroring is far from the truth. Shelly said that the image (poetry) is more beautiful than the truth and the truth is distorted. Many literary works have offered much response to the subject of discussion. Opinions are proposed in a rhetorical way and are corroborated by several recognized facts. Plato expressed the belief in Sherry's opinion divergence and reaction to poetry, with Plato Republic and Shelly's "Defense of Poetry" in two works. Through rhetorical means such as metaphor and symbolism, through the use of deductive logic and Socratic sentences, Plato provides powerful and highly supportive arguments, but Shelley's long structure, analogy and metaphor are weak.

"Socrates, can you teach?" 1 The conversation started with asking if Mayo can teach vocals to Socrates. At the end of Meno (86 d - 100 b), Socrates tried to answer this question. This question was raised before separating opinion and knowledge, and both felt uneasy. Anytus participated in a conversation about the virtues of Socrates and Meno. Socrates claims to be able to learn if virtue is a kind of knowledge. If it is something other than a kind of knowledge, it will not be taught. The main purpose of Plato's Menor is to explore the nature of virtue. Therefore, the mouthpiece of Socrates and Plato, and the sophisticated student Menno tried to answer the question "What is virtue"? At first, they did not understand what virtues prompted to ask if Meno should even think that the answer is possible. The problem is how you can find something like virtue when you do not know what you are looking for. If you already know what it is, you do not need to find it; however, if you do not know what it is, how do you know when you find it? The problem of finding something's definition is called "paradox of investigation" In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Plato's Meno offered several possible clues about hostility between Anytus and Socrates. In Meno, Plato reported that the claim of Socrates was not that the great politician could not irritate Antotus in understanding the virtue in the history of Athens. Plato quotes Anytus to warn Socrates: "Socrates, I think you are ready to tell the bad guys: and I will take care of you if you accept my advice I will advise you. "Complain. Socrates has something to do with Antutus' son. Plato says Socrates, "I have a short relationship with the son of Antutus, I think he is not missing in the spirit." Whether or not sexual behavior is included in this relationship is unknown, but like Socrates - Athens' then many men at that time - bisexuals, sleeping with some young students. Enitos almost certainly denied his son's relationship with Socrates. Any dissatisfaction added to Anytus must be Socrates' advice to his son.

The criticism of Mr. Kroto Plato occurred after Socrates was sentenced to death and sat down in a prison cell. Creo was a close friend of Socrates, wanted to persuade him to visit Socrates and persuade him to escape to his old friend. But Socrates logically denied Creo's assertion. Creo began his argument from telling Socrates the bad news, he told him that the ship from Delos was approaching and that he was the moment he was approved to die. Socrates seemed dissatisfied with his fateful death, but Creo tried to persuade him to help him escape from prison and escape from Athens. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments. Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?

In ancient Greece women were seen as many things. In any case, they are not considered comparable to men. Women are often portrayed as being controlled by submissive households. They play a supplementary or secondary role in life and men often ask their wives, but they hope that they will stick to their hopes. In tragic Medea wrote by Euripides, unlike most Greek women who only played a minor role, Medea played an important role in this story, but she was the other Greek lady Also showed many differences with. Behavior and spiritual pattern At Medea of ​​Euripides, the hero's Medea shows her aggressive revenge, cruel and brutal passion and undermines the misfortune of traditional African women by becoming a very clever woman It shows the features. Medea shows myself as a positive and resolute woman who is ready to do what she has done in the story. Begging this book, she began threatening to retaliate against her husband Jason, "Because he did something to me, I could find a way or my husband If you want to pay ... "9). Media touched only the anger he developed for his husband in his body. Traditional Athenian women mourn to lose their husbands and may be angry with him, but they never swear to take revenge on his actions. In this case, the woman often depends on her husband and still depicts that he will do something for him. When he decided that it was time for Medea to kill his own child, she came up with a slight idea. I am an unfortunate woman "(p. 40). This is a traditional women's idea of ​​Athens, but she can not promise her plan or kill her own child. On the other hand, Medea listened to God listening to her children, so she took over her reasonable and direct thinking self to her enthusiasm and hatred of Jason. As the story goes on, the cruel and savage passion of Media transcends her reasoning. Medea's view, unlike traditional Athenian women's views, "... I think that even the most helpless woman in doing good deeds is the most evil and clever trick. Your child should not die. "(Page 29, Medea) This reveals the most important part of the drama.The audience no longer supports Medea, but she is being shocked and insulted.The pity, this is about women The feminist stereotype is a tool that shows that it is a belief that is still firmly held by society.The role of "maternity" and "raising" is a feature of female sex, and media kills her child I ignored it correctly. Medea of ​​Euripides and Medea of ​​Seneca are Medea's two surviving ancient tragedies. These two versions are very different and contrast in some ways. Euripides portrays Medea as more humanistic. She is a synonym of a suppressed housewife who can only endure crimes committed after suffering. Seneca's Medea was revening more than Olympus and she was angry from the start. The version of Seneca also depicts Medea as a witch of revenge, which is known as a witch in the Euripides version and has extraordinary skills in poisons and potions, but it is not like the beauty of Seneca. Dea is equally important and important. These two poets provide a clear depiction and personality of Medea. The most prominent of them is a depiction of her actions by Medea himself and the choir.

Knowledge Plato Plato believes that philosophy can purify the soul and prepare for death. Through his work, the Republic, he talked about how similar each individual and everything is in the process of thinking. Plato believes wisdom will be acquired over time. As people grow, they come into contact with many situations and events that provide experience and teaching. Everything that happens in life shapes how they will be, how their wisdom grows, and how much wisdom they get. As far as methodology is concerned, Plato explains that it is a methodist in his knowledge processing. Plato also considers knowledge as a human objective attribute. One of the most important features of Plato's philosophy, what he seems to have superseded from Socrates is that when we make something to an individual (eg knowledge), an individual has some universal character Because I believe it belongs to. Therefore, it is said that an individual knows a specific situation because it meets the conditions necessary for knowledge in a particular situation or situation. What is that knowledge? "Knowledge" is defined as "a rational and true belief". In order to "know" we have our own emotions, reasons, recognition and knowledge. According to Plato's knowledge theory, knowledge is available as long as there are reasonable truths and beliefs. Plato's knowledge theory and belief - continuity of knowledge is consistent. Truth is an objective requirement of knowledge. But if you believe something is the truth, it does not necessarily make you think it's real Plato's assertion that epistemology or knowledge theory is one of the most important themes in philosophy and "knowledge is just true belief" has brought about little future development in this field. Plato's idea is that thought is never considered deterministic as opinion is emanating from the world of effervescence of sensory perception, true knowledge comes from the eternal form of the world is. Based on formal theory, Plato believes that true knowledge exists essentially within his soul and is enveloped in their perception of reality. In his memory theory, Plato pointed out that once the soul was alive in reality, it had all the knowledge, but once it occupied the human body it was forgotten. Therefore, Plato stated that a new form of "learning" is simply a memory of what we knew before.

Plato explains the cave where people are confined together and only the shadows cast on the wall can be seen. He compares these shadows with those surrounding people see. He is contrary to norms, customs, traditions, customs etc. Plato believes that they ignore the real truth, as people are very focused on the shadows of these truths. He compares these shadows with those surrounding people see. The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle. Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form. The previous question was not answered by Plato's theory. Aristotle rejected Plato's method of division. But Aristotle denied Platonic doctrine, too. According to metaphysics (1, 9), the shape of Plato can not explain eternity and world order. More importantly, he believes Plato's formal theory can not explain anything in our material world. Attributes of the table (according to Plato's format, eternal, immutable, transcendental etc.) are not compatible with material objects, the metaphor of participation and imitation is often broken. For example, it is unclear how a white object participates or copies on a white form. In other words, it is difficult to understand the relationship between the white figure and the white object itself.

In ancient Greece there were two great literary philosophers. The first is Plato, then Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Author: Gerard · Cretian Plato and Aristotle Many modern experts believe Plato was the first true political philosophy, Aristotle is the first political scholar. They are the foundation of Socrates's great thinker and great Western philosopher. Plato and Aristotle each have ideas on how to improve their society during their existence. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze their different theories with this heavy metaphysical speculation. In conclusion, Hume wishes to limit metaphysical speculation to one field and is not so inclined to such a fate. Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

In one of the first accounting known as Plato, we met a very interesting person called Socrates; the ambition of a person seeking knowledge inevitably had a great impact on humans. Most importantly, the way to get this knowledge makes him very attractive. This method is called ironic in Socrates in the literature. In any case, as Socrates depicts the sense of modesty of wisdom, I will introduce the extreme signs of this method of Plato. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports a platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to the so-called expert with such skills and insight - Euthyphro - in this case, and that the latter lacked real understanding I made it clear. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

The concept of Euthyphro sanctity of Plato is essentially the real problem is that God is loved by the Holy Spirit as it is called the love of God and is itself sacred. The main problem that arises is thought to be sacred. The worshipers will have some meaning about God. What I would like to say is that whatever human beliefs are, they will obey because God will obey. Therefore, if you want to examine the opposite side of the spectrum, there are more considerations in terms of sanctity and sanctity. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to so-called experts with such skills and insight - in this case Euthyphro -. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

Plato and Aristotle Plato and Aristotle have two different views on health. But everyone's perception of health is directly related to his view of imitating ideas as forms of knowledge. Their lack of appreciation and tragedy is in fact directly related to their own views on health and emotion. First, it is important to consider all people's perception of health. An important consideration is Plato's attitude toward Aristotle. The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle. Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age Plato 's national political theory is more rational than Socrates and Aristotle, but Greek philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle have nearly the same belief about the relationship between people and the country. Socrates, Plato people, and Aristotleans all think that people are not self-sufficient. They believe that people will be happiest in their life in the country. They also want all men to have a really beautiful life. They are consistent with the truth and can achieve their ultimate goal. Socrates, Plato and Aristotle have similar political views about the country, but Plato's view is more reasonable than that of Socrates and Aristotle because he created an ideal country. What is Socrates, Plato, Aristotle's contribution to the Western philosophy? Also, how are their legacy reflected in today's education? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the three most legendary ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates is today admired as an instant of wisdom and philosophical life. He stimulated the so-called Socratic method. And it repeatedly asked the students to help the teacher clarify their deepest ideas. Plato's student Aristotle is known for his breadth and depth of knowledge. He provided a universal, spiritual form in our material world through sensory observation and Plato's integration of scientist beliefs. He teaches that a benign life includes a gentle path between rational control of desire and choice of extreme value.

When I read Plato's apology, I have been lost, but after reading it I started to understand it. An apology is about the person being tried. He is condemned not to recognize not only God recognized by the state for his life, but corrupted youth. When he had not tried his speech was an apology that did not recognize the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. This is a very easy story. He explained to the court in an honest and straightforward way to speak in a familiar way without the experience of court law. I read Plato's apology. The nature of Socrates began with the accusation that his accuser was wrong about what he said. He said that he was telling the truth there, but he knew that he was never in the court, so he did not eloquence as claimed by whistleblowers. He wants the jury to focus on the justice of his career. Socrates first solved the old accusations against him when the jury was a child and rumors about him made him an operator of a word that he did not believe in God. He pointed out that the job of removing the prejudices of these juries is a difficult task. Since he did not know anything about natural philosophy, he focused on the work of Aristophanes himself, which was absurd and ridiculous. I do not believe he has reason to blame him. When I read Plato's apology, I have been lost, but after reading it I started to understand it. An apology is about the person being tried. He is condemned not to recognize not only God recognized by the state for his life, but corrupted youth. When he had not tried his speech was an apology that did not recognize the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. This is a very easy story. He explained to the court in an honest and straightforward way to speak in a familiar way without the experience of court law.

Plato (428 - 347 BC) is considered one of the world's greatest philosophers. He is concerned about the specific problem of his own time, but Plato's idea has always been transcended. Over the years, his work has been translated into multiple languages ​​and studied by great thinkers all over the world. The revival of Plato's thought occurred during the Renaissance. Plato's idea exists in its original form, but translators and critics of the Renaissance often understood them in a different way than anticipated. Plato is a famous figure of the Renaissance, but only a few examples of Platonic myths are found. Probably Plato's attitude towards visual expression - arguing that it lacks the highest philosophical knowledge and attacks poets and artists many times - Plato's own oppression to suppress and deter attempts to paint, sculpture, printmaking The mythical scene is very vivid. Perhaps the artist just feels that he is not qualified for this job. McGrath (2009) reviews and analyzes Plato's mythical character and the rare illustration of the landscape in the image of the Renaissance era: the synonym of the seminar, the tanks of the Phaedrus, the caves, and the backbone of the universe handled by the fate of the Republic Kribanski, Raymond, 1982, the continuation of medieval Plato tradition, and Platonic Parmenides of the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Klaus International Press. (Continuity of medieval Plato tradition: a review of the original Platonic system in London, Warburg Institute in 1939, and a new introduction and four additional chapters in the volume of 1982 were reprinted. "Medieval and Renaissance Ned of the era: The chapter in the history of Plato's research was originally posted in medieval and Renaissance study 2 (1943), pages 281-330 and was reprinted in a new preface. " In the center of art, Plato and Aristotle are discussing the merits of idealism and realism, respectively. Plato holds his work "one of the few Renaissance works of platinum" Timios, and explains how the universe was made by a perfect mathematical model, form and ordinary geometric entities. . Raise his hand at his right Plato, showing this eternal form such as beauty, goodness, true ideal in this world, not transcendental, eternal purely ideological field

In contrast to Plato and Confucius since the early community, people began to gather in the community life, we are increasing, we can see the timeline in a stable, orderly social organization I will. But this is not 2, well-known philosophers and teachers Confucius or Plato seeking something like progress. Demonstration with a sort of social reform and change In the teachings and writings of the two of us, we are considered to be the value specified by a gentleman composed of savage social movements, social practical and ethical behavior, looking at the confusion I will. Confucius and Plato, Confucius and Plato are the most respected and most widely studied by two historical teachers. The characteristics of a good leader about how to manage the development of philosophy and people. Their idea is that their idea has many similarities and is beneficial for the civilization they live in. I believe the ideal leader is a mixture of two men who I thought. - Plato and Confucius Today there are thousands of reliable philosophers for those studying there, so learners choose to bear on. Everyone has amazing knowledge and insight, we can all learn something from it. Some people never call philosophers themselves, philosophy brought us and some people dedicate to love of wisdom In contrast to Plato and Confucius since the early community, people began to gather in the community life, we are increasing, we can see the timeline in a stable, orderly social organization I will. But this is not 2, well-known philosophers and teachers Confucius or Plato seeking something like progress. - The Tokugawa shogunate was founded around 1600, which will reduce the impact of society's external relations in Japan. This fortress continues even in the Western countries, but it helps resist the change and development of Japan. After two centuries of self-separation in other countries of the world, strong return to foreigners in Japan Significant change It is obvious that collective Confucius and Plato will affect them in a classical period. Perhaps Confucius teaching, easier than Plato dialogue accepted Confucius teachings are not trying to change the Republic's way political control of Plato. Through moral thinking and action, they are convinced to protect the truth and justice. Confucius philosophy Confucius 'approach' focused on self-realization of that person,

The philosophical idea associated with Plato and the Parthenon Platon Platon contains whether or not the structure is an element of the world that can be understood whether the structure is an element of the visible world. In my opinion, Plato sees the Parthenon as an object in the visible world. The Parthenon temple is a tangible monument in our real world. The Parthenon Temple is a building project that includes science and mathematics. Plato's scientific and mathematical views are classified as world-understandable forms. The Parthenon temple is an ancient Greek temple dedicated to the goddess Athena Partenos. The Parthenon Temple is now ruined, but it is still a masterpiece of Greek architecture. It took 15 years to build the Parthenon, and the Parthenon temple was built under the guidance of the pellicle. Greek artist Fidias supervised the design of the Parthenon temple. The Parthenon temple is a huge rectangular marble temple with 17 pillars on each side and 8 pillars at both ends. It is about 31 x 70 meters in size. The central part of the Parthenon is a room with two rooms separated by walls. Each room can be accessed from the pouch facing the pillar. There is an image of Athena in the room 1) The Parthenon Temple was built to replace the temple of Athena that was famous at that time. The structure of Parthenon consists of a rectangular floor with a series of lower steps on both sides, and columns of columns extend around the building. There are multiple entries, and six entries are added to the top of each entry. The Parthenon temple has two large rooms. The larger one of the two interiors is called "The Naos" and there is an image inside. - Regardless of whether the standard, whether it is a classroom paper, architect scientific interview, or urban architecture, everything exists to comply with a particular format of standards. Standards are the principle of modeling informing things to survive. From local building standards to LEED, building standards are defined and redefined everyday. This will help build a community and lead a more progressive lifestyle.

We chose to write a paper on Plato 's thought and reasoning (something to be something). (Prose 1) Virtue is in the harmony of the human soul and the world of thinking, which ensures a constantly changing world of order, wisdom and pattern. In this view, there are three parts of the soul, corresponding to three different interests, three virtues, three personality, depending on which part of the soul is dominant. As shown below, this is three social classes that should be based on three personality, interests, virtues. Plato's Seminar Plato's metaphor for a parting line is essentially two worlds, the world of the world (material world or presence / presence world) and the world of knowledge (world of knowledge / presence / natural world) . This concept is the key to the background of the symposium "Love". It is worth noting that as speeches evolved through specific tasks they were parallel to the concept. - The meaning of love is as complex and unique as the purpose of that service. The essence of love seems to be in the heart, the body, and the soul. At Plato's seminar, members of each drinking party will explain about love. When each speaker participates in his discourse, evaluate the concept of love from different perspectives At the time, Plato and Nietzsche were the two most famous and most famous philosophers in the world. Plato's seminar is based on a series of speech about love, purpose, and existence. For each presentation, seven different people each representing a speech about love participate. Nietzsche's spoke like this Zarathustra is like a philosophical novel than a dialogue like Plato seminar. Nietzsche's writing is more about the purpose and a deep understanding of morality. Nietzsche talked about the human walk before reaching "Superman". Since "Superman" built his own values ​​and goals, Nietzsche then talked about "Superman" without any discrimination and morality (SparkNotes Editors, Summary) Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different.

When comparing Aristotle and Plato, there are two excellent philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great people, and their ideas have not been forgotten for years. Although their political thoughts are similar, I found that there are some differences in their teachings. These ideas began with Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Plaist is based on abstract reasonable moral knowledge, but Aristotle is based on experience and is trying to apply it more to specific lives. Today a lot of people respect these two lifestyles. Plato started his teaching to commemorate his close friend Socrates. In this article, we compare and contrast the concept of citizenship between Plato and Aristotle by first giving the definition of citizenship. Let us compare and contrast ideas of Plato and Aristotle's citizens by discussing ideal conditions, social roles, humanities education, and fair society. In order to understand the concept of citizenship of Plato and Aristotle, we must first understand the definition of citizenship. The precise definition of citizenship is highly controversial. The general definition of citizenship is "right to participate in politics and represent politics" (John Baylis, 2011, p. When comparing Aristotle and Plato, there are two excellent philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These are great people, and their ideas have not been forgotten for years. Although their political thoughts are similar, I found that there are some differences in their teachings. These ideas began with Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Plaist is based on abstract reasonable moral knowledge, but Aristotle is based on experience and is trying to apply it more to specific lives. Today, many people respect these two lifestyles ... Even friends, enemies, and even families are growing for the people of all walks everyday. Do not agree, cause conflicts, fight for what we believe. This is part of the human nature even if it means entering other people's toes. Reflecting on the complexity of Aristotle dates back to 335 BC, when I wrote poetry - the earliest work of drama theory - which survived.

Plato was born in an aristocratic family of Athens in Greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, was thought of as the descendant of the early king of Athens, and his mother Perictione married Pyrilampes. When young, Plato is always interested in political leadership and eventually becomes a disciple of Socrates. He follows his philosophy and dialectic, and it is believed to pursue the truth through questions, answers and other questions. After witnessing the death of Socrates in the hands of the Athenian Democrat in 399 BC, Plato left Athens and continued his trip to Italy, Sicily and Egypt. Reasons why I chose: Scientific genius of Einstein, Darwin, Newton, and Galileo. The basic philosophy of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle is the cornerstone of Western civilization. Da Vinci and Maimonides have extraordinary abilities to pursue an interdisciplinary spirit. King Solomon's wisdom and women's "international mystery". Finally, Al Ma'arri, Spinoza (Darwin, Galileo, Socrates) has the courage to stick to their own thoughts despite the serious impact of public contempt on death. Finally, I summarize the main points explained in this article. These are very easily integrated into Plato's genius. Its purpose is to emphasize the main reason Plato object to democracy. Plato's claim is shaped by his wonderful idea and another point of his creative genius is shaped by the world in which he lives. There is the possibility of creating a chaotic and disorderly society, which ultimately leads to tyranny, there is a decline in motivation for governance. Second, Plato believes that democratic means of choosing leaders in the world to which social classes and groups belong is not a fertile basis for nurturing an ideal leader. Finally, Plato believes that leaders should be trained for leadership purposes from a young age. Genius Geography, Eric Weiner. Plato once said that "the honor of a certain country has been cultivated there." For teachers, coaches, managers, or anyone who can build other high-quality cultures, you need to read it. In addition, the text of Weiner is very interesting and belongs to his own league. Grit, Angela Duckworth. Talent x effort = skills and skills x effort = achievement. Duckworth says that what matters to us is not nature or cultivation, but cultivating our nature. Being able to stick and stick there is like Duckworth's so-called "grit". She received the MacArthur Genius Award for her research.

In the first part of the Republic of Plato, several definitions of justice and injustice were investigated. Cephalus, Polemarchus, Glaucon, Thracymicus all share their views and thoughts about what they believe to be fair behavior. Meanwhile, Socrates poses questions on every aspect of the definition. In the first book, Socrates believed that cheating was beneficial but was eventually challenged by Thracymicus who convinced him that his definition was ineffective. Cephalus talks about integrity and justification, Polemarchus explores the idea of ​​giving attempted behavior to people, Glaucon is seeing justice as a result of its consequences, but Socrates justice does not harm anyone I believe. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.