Plato and Aristotle

Plato explains the cave where people are confined together and only the shadows cast on the wall can be seen. He compares these shadows with those surrounding people see. He is contrary to norms, customs, traditions, customs etc. Plato believes that they ignore the real truth, as people are very focused on the shadows of these truths. He compares these shadows with those surrounding people see.

The purpose of this paper is to compare and compare the realistic views of Biarritz and Plato. Plato and Aristotle were among the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, and they were connected in the study. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle learned at Plato University. Plato was the first of the two to learn, and Aristotle studied there. And after learning this, people will think that both philosophers have the same belief and theory, but actually the opposite is true, but the theory of some people is theoretical to others Give your thoughts. Plato is a faithful believer in God, Aristotle follows the laws of science, thus creating all the dichotomies of the famous Plato and Aristotle.

Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form.

The previous question was not answered by Plato's theory. Aristotle rejected Plato's method of division. But Aristotle denied Platonic doctrine, too. According to metaphysics (1, 9), the shape of Plato can not explain eternity and world order. More importantly, he believes Plato's formal theory can not explain anything in our material world. Attributes of the table (according to Plato's format, eternal, immutable, transcendental etc.) are not compatible with material objects, the metaphor of participation and imitation is often broken. For example, it is unclear how a white object participates or copies on a white form. In other words, it is difficult to understand the relationship between the white figure and the white object itself.