Plato and Confucius

Plato and Confucius today have thousands of trustworthy philosophers people have to learn, so choosing learners is a burden. Everyone has wonderful knowledge and insight, and then you can learn something. Some people do not call themselves a philosopher, but bring philosophical thinking to us, and some people devote their lives to the love of wisdom. Philosophers have existed for thousands of years, and as long as the sun rises, there will be future philosophers.

Confucius, Plato Confucius and Plato are the two most historical teachers who are most respected and widely studied. Philosophical thinking on how to rule people and what characteristics should be developed for good leaders. Both ideas are good for the civilizations they live in and there are many similarities in their ideas. My view on an ideal leader is a mixture of these two ideas. - Plato and Confucius today have thousands of trustworthy philosophers people have to learn, so choosing learners is a burden. Everyone has wonderful knowledge and insight, and then you can learn something. Some people do not call themselves a philosopher, but bring philosophical thinking to us, and some people devote their lives to the love of wisdom.

When you look at Confucius and Plato in bulk, it is clear that they all affect the classic era. Confucius teachings are more acceptable than Plato's dialogue, probably because the teachings of Confucius are not trying to alter the political control of the Republic of Plato. They are convinced that truth and justice will be supported through moral thinking and action. Confucius '' Confucius aleale '' method mainly focuses on self realization.

In the last few thousand years, few philosophers have done detailed research like Plato (probably Aristotle and Confucius are his only equality in this regard). I will do with the enthusiasm of the Renaissance humanist, and I recently introduced the complexity of Greek grammar and prepared to settle the giant of this idea. But when thinking about Plato, our idea usually imagines a philosopher philosopher (the prince of a philosopher), we are a writer of the huge republic or eloquent poet - a philosopher apologizing (even law maintenance) However, I do not think much about Plato's so-called secondary dialogue.