Crito by Plato

The criticism of Mr. Kroto Plato occurred after Socrates was sentenced to death and sat down in a prison cell. Creo was a close friend of Socrates, wanted to persuade him to visit Socrates and persuade him to escape to his old friend. But Socrates logically denied Creo's assertion. Creo began his argument from telling Socrates the bad news, he told him that the ship from Delos was approaching and that he was the moment he was approved to die. Socrates seemed dissatisfied with his fateful death, but Creo tried to persuade him to help him escape from prison and escape from Athens.

In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent

In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments.

Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?