plato & aristotle

At these meetings, I better understood Aristotle and Plato's thinking and theory. In particular, I am particularly interested in Aristotle and the two extreme concepts and aim for "gray or the middle of the way". I am also interested in Plato's theory about the effects of justice and injustice and their behavior. Aristotle is working hard to understand that life is the best of the two worlds. He tried to define the median value of the available lifetime.

In that regard, Aristotle was born in St. Kitts in Macedonia in 384 BC, and died in Euboea, Greece in 22 B.C. Like Plato, Aristotle is an ancient Greek philosopher and Aristotle is a Plato student. At the age of 18, he entered Plato University in Athens and stayed until the age of 37 (347 BC). His work covers many fields including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, linguistics, political science and government . The first comprehensive system of Western philosophy.

Aristotle's criticism against the plateau's formal theory is a major theme and is still expanding. Aristotle does not quote Plato and it often gathers up. The classic commentary therefore endorsed Aristotle as an introduction to Plato. As historians of the past, Aristotle is irreplaceable, but this is a secondary factor in his own dialectic dialect, sometimes dealing with so-called influences as Plato actually said. They also protected them. When studying criticisms of Aristotle's "form", it is beneficial to understand Aristotle's own ghost forms and he intends to preserve Plato's theory largely through this form.

The previous question was not answered by Plato's theory. Aristotle rejected Plato's method of division. But Aristotle denied Platonic doctrine, too. According to metaphysics (1, 9), the shape of Plato can not explain eternity and world order. More importantly, he believes Plato's formal theory can not explain anything in our material world. Attributes of the table (according to Plato's format, eternal, immutable, transcendental etc.) are not compatible with material objects, the metaphor of participation and imitation is often broken. For example, it is unclear how a white object participates or copies on a white form. In other words, it is difficult to understand the relationship between the white figure and the white object itself.