Rethinking the Philosophy of Education
[2023-09-17 14:11:12]
Rethinking the philosophy of education: Philosophy is a special way to express the world. If philosophy is a radical problem, the task of educational philosophy is to transform education into problems through practice of criticism. With this in mind, we ask if teaching is feasible. What can truly spread. As psychoanalysis shows, people are those who want to exist and there is only a desire to learn. By interwoven this philosophy and psychoanalysis, we can think about the impossibility of education from the viewpoint of three issues.
What is the main philosophy of education? The main philosophy of education is divided into three main types: teacher-centered philosophy, student-centered philosophy, social-centered philosophy. These include essentialism, perennialism, progressiveism, social reconstructionism, existentialism, behaviorism, constitutionism, conservatism, humanism. Essentialism and perennialism are two teacher-centered educational philosophies. Essentialism is the primary method of public education in the United States. Over time, society needs to teach basic skills. Perennialism focuses on the teachings of wonderful works
For example, philosophy has varying degrees, there are life philosophy, religious philosophy, educational philosophy. However, they include four educational philosophies: perennialism, essentialism, progressiveism, and social reconstruction. After calculating my score on philosophical evaluation in the Kauchak and Eggen textbooks, I discovered that my personal educational philosophy is an equal combination of perennial and social reconstruction. According to Kauchak and Eggen, perennialism includes the teachings of classical knowledge.
My educational philosophy education has four major philosophical schools: perennialism, progressiveism, essentialism, and existentialism. The result of my educational philosophy module shows that I am very eclectic, and the strongest attributes are progressiveism and essentialism. My lowest attribute of this module is existential. - In addition, Abrams commented on how many reforms passed, none are "impressive". Because all reform bills were passed, Abrams answered that failure with reasonable grounds. Abrams also said that progressive people "lose hostility to union hostility", that is, to share the wealth of workers and people, to balance the power of companies. Even if the age of progress comes, there is no major change in the distribution of social benefits.