These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "Utilitarianism". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback Ethical view of Utilitarianism. This article briefly introduces a practical perspective first, then applies them to the questions provided at the end of case studies. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a philosophical point of view including moral and moral behavior derived from utility. Practicality is often replaced by a happy idea. Therefore, happiness is regarded as the ultimate benefit of making ethical decisions. Utilitarianism is happiness Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the result, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed a utilitarian idea. Utilitarian thinks that actions that create more happiness in the world are correct behavior and I believe that behavior that leads to a decrease in pain and happiness is wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory originally named Jeremy as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonists (happy followers) proposed "principles". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness' What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept and if it tends to promote the happiness of the maximum number of people it will maintain correct behavior. Utilitarians define morally correct behavior as actions to maximize certain non-moral good or happiness and to minimize certain unethical evils. Happiness is an example of nonmoral goodness, and pain is an example of unethical evil. Utilitarian consequences on action rather than inherent consequences

Utilitarianism is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that acts when it tends to promote the happiness of the maximum number of people. Utilitarians define morally correct behavior as actions that maximize certain non-moral good or happiness and minimize certain unethical evils. Happiness is an example of unethical quality and pain is an example of unethical evil. Utilitarians affect the behavior of behaviors rather than the inherent nature of behavior and the motives of perpetrators. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world. In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of action utilitism is "What special results are expected for X?" (Fali). Society must always obey the rules

The principle of Utilitarian utilitarianism "the greatest happiness" can be traced back to Francis Hutchinson and David Hume in Scotland in the 18th century. Utilitarian theory was first developed by Jeremy Bentham. His student John Stuart Mill was the most famous Utilitarian and accepted this theory. America is struggling to strengthen freedom and democracy, and to gain independence from the UK. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

Utilitarianism is a moral theory that determines good and evil by focusing on the outcome. This is a kind of resultism Utilitarian thinks that the most ethical choice is the choice that produces the greatest profit for maximum profit. It is the only ethical framework that can be used to justify military power and war. It is also the most commonly used method of moral reasoning in business as it can also explain cost and benefits. However, we can not predict the future, so it is difficult to know exactly whether the outcome of our action is good or bad. This is one of the limits of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is also difficult to explain the values ​​of justice and individual rights. For example, suppose that four people live in a hospital. Life depends on organ transplant: heart, lung, kidney, and liver. When a healthy person is in the hospital, his organs are harvested at the expense of one life, and four lives can be saved. This can be said to be the maximum benefit of the maximum amount. However, few people think that this is an acceptable way of behavior, not to mention the most ethical behavior. Therefore, while Utilitarianism can be said to be the most reasonable way to judge good and evil, it has obvious limitations. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory to produce the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happinessist utilitarianism). Some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitarians) argue that the results of actions of individuals should be compared and examined, and that the results of adopting a specific code of conduct should be considered There are also people to think about. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world. In this article, we define action utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, use rule utilitarianism and action utilitarianism to decipher the reaction to abortion, investigate both arguments if utilitarianism is sufficient for discussion and resolution I will. Issues of abortion First of all, Utilitarianism is defined as "a morally correct act, only if it improves overall happiness over other options available" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types. The first is behavioral Utilitarians in which they look for the most interesting behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of behavioral utilitarian is "What kind of special results do you expect X to have?" (Fali). Society must always follow the rules

Utilitarianism has many papers, papers, books on the concept of right and wrong. The philosopher theorized the eternal moral behavior, one of which is John Stuart Mill. In his book 'Utilitarianism' he is trying to improve the theory of utilitarianism of previous philosophers. In Mill's book, he proposed an ideology with another branch in the utilitarian tree. This branch is called rule Utilitarianism. Mill distinguishes between two different types of utilitarianism, behavioral utilitism and dominated utilitarianism. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

Utilitarian concept of sustainable development is an attempt to balance the two moral requirements of the environment. The first demand is development, including economic development and growth. It comes primarily from the interests of people living in developing countries. Their current poverty lowers the quality of life, urgently calling for measures to improve the quality of life. The second requirement is sustainability to keep future risks on current profits from risk. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world. In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of action utilitism is "What special results are expected for X?" (Fali). Society must always obey the rules

The field of ethics in Utilitarian philosophy is complicated, extensive and extremely controversial. It includes the concept of systematization, defense and review of good and evil. Philosophers usually divide ethics into three main parts: meta ethics, norm ethics, and applied ethics. Applied ethics is a field of ethics including analysis of controversial specific ethical issues such as abortion, animal rights, euthanasia. Normative ethics calls for ideal rules in the easiest way to try out the right behavior. As an abstract ethical theory, Utilitarianism has become one of several realistic options that must be considered, or it is refuted by any philosopher who has a place in normative ethics Or has been accepted. Utilitarianism now appears in various modifications and complex expressions. If that is not theoretically impossible, the ideal of Bentham 's happy calculation is generally considered practical. In the 20th century philosophers noticed other problems of Utilitarian programs. For example, one of them is the process of judging the influence of behavior. Conceptual and practical problems are related to processes that are regarded as impact, even if the value of these effects is not accurately quantified. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. Utilitarianism is often related to a more specific doctrine of Bentham and Mill. They measure the resulting goodwill by affecting happiness and welfare of perceived living beings. Bentham focuses on happiness and Mill's more abstract happiness concept makes it possible for him to maintain the view that "human dissatisfaction is dissatisfied". I'm in the mood. "Pigs are satisfied; it is better that Socrates is not satisfied with pigs. For details, refer to the introduction of Part V.

As a philosophical approach, utilitarianism usually focuses on the principle of 'greatest happiness'. According to the principle of maximum happiness, the act of promoting overall happiness and happiness is considered a correct behavior. In addition, for Mill, actions to improve happiness are morally correct, while actions that produce bad results and unfortunate consequences are considered moral errors. From this point of view, we can deduce that utilitarianism gives us moral obligations and ways to maximize happiness and reduce suffering to ensure "the principle of greatest happiness" . As you can imagine, I tried to destroy materialism by reducing ridiculous things. Here is the objection to Utilitarianism. You might notice that Utilitarianism is not the only moral code that is allowed by materialism but that is the morality that is held most frequently by the materialists and I follow these landslides I want to do it. Yes, jack-arcalon is related to this cute post about Congo. Everything is funny, but it is also very long. Either way, the most important thing is that the K-selected people think irresponsibly that Congo women are stateless and have so many children in the countries. Normal practice is to intentionally trigger constraints as a weapon of fear. If there are multiple children in this lively country, at least one of them can be kidnapped, tortured for entertainment, and expected to be sentenced to death. The most common argument against negative utilitarianism is the theory of world destruction and the negative utilitarian means that if someone can kill everyone or destroy the world painlessly it will be responsible for it . Discussants often support other forms of performance-based, usually traditional utilitarianism. People always believed that negative utilitarianism is more irrational than other theories. Therefore, those who discover the theory in the spirit of Utilitarianism should not pursue negative utilitarianism, but are thought to choose traditional utilitarianism or other similar theory, such as priority I will. I think this was a mistake.

One of the most obvious problems I have seen in utilitarianism is that it incorporates animals under the protection theory umbrella. There seems to be no doubt that there are too many cases where the result of infringing on the best interests of animals is beneficial to human beings, but this verbal behavior is an act that the general public adopts and continues to accept. Utilitarian philosophy declares that the happiness and suffering experienced by all individuals (including animals) are of comparable value and declare that they must be taken into account in determining the net benefit of the outcome of the action, It is a fundamental challenge. The most important deficiency in utilitarian effectiveness is that the judgment is based on the results of the hypothesis rather than actual results. Likewise, it may be true to judge fun in the short term, but it is difficult to judge the outcome of actions from short-term or distant future, but proved to be wrong in the long run It may be done. In this case, what is the result to consider and what is the moral judgment? It makes sense to link morality with the pursuit of happiness and pain, but since the pursuit of individuals is the subject of happiness obligation for most people, it does not support it. Essay.com / "Assessment of Utilitarianism" - What is the main feature of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Consider and consider criticism of Utilitarianism "Assessment of Utilitarianism" - What are the main characteristics of Utilitarianism as ethical theory? Consider and consider criticism of Utilitarianism From a Christian perspective, Utilitarianism has many flaws. Utilitarianism is based on the belief that humans try to escape the pain in search of happiness, but the author of the Bible believes that happiness should not be a driving force for human behavior. In addition, Utilitarianism does not distinguish between a person's behavior of making a form of self-sacrifice for greater profit and an act of more problematic behavior to achieve the same result. Christ is criticizing that utilitarianism does not recognize the importance of self-sacrifice, as Jesus is a living example of self-sacrifice Christians are attempting to obey. Essay.com / "Assessment of Utilitarianism" - What is the main feature of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Consider and consider criticism of Utilitarianism "Assessment of Utilitarianism" - What are the main characteristics of Utilitarianism as ethical theory? Consider and consider criticism of Utilitarianism In response to such opposition, some Utilitarian supporters revised the theory. The primitive form of utilitarianism with so many flaws is called action utilitarianism. Behavior Utilitarianism argues that each action should be evaluated directly based on utility principles. Ideal and highly desirable improvement is rule utilitarian, where actions are evaluated through rules, and if these rules are followed in general, the maximum number of maximum benefits will be provided.

Utilitarian decided proper consideration when Utilitarianism of the Miller faced an ethical dilemma but did not provide a realistic way to gather the necessary information to do the necessary calculations. The lack of information is a problem when evaluating the problem principle that it is necessary to emphasize Utilitarianism in evaluating welfare issues and making ethical decisions. Utilitarian attempts to solve these two difficulties by attracting experience; however, neither matching the individual decisions with heuristics nor assigning relative weights to various considerations has been proposed. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) discusses qualitative differences in enjoyment in chapter 2 of his utilitarianism (1863). Utilitarianism of Mil says that "behavior is right because it tends to promote happiness, because mistakes tend to promote the opposite of happiness." (Piest, p.10) "Happiness is happiness, no pain, lack of happiness, lack of pain, lack of pain." (Ibid) It is speculated that a person may be not a hedonist but a Utilitarian It is. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this.

Utilitarianism in that political philosophy is a substitute for natural law theory and social contract by doing the authority of the government and the dignity of individual rights based on its usefulness or the happiness it receives. As an egalitarian doctrine, the happiness of all people is equal, the utilitarian rationality and the relatively direct nature provide an attractive model for democratic governments. It provides a practical way to determine an ethically correct course of action - "For people suspected, it tends to promote happiness, so it tends to decrease so it is a correct behavior "(Bentham), 1780). An example of simple utilitarianism: The government can choose to protect a sovereign island or to take over it to the country that is attacking it. This war will kill a lot of people, but if the government follows a simple utilitarianism, they must participate in war to ensure that all other small sovereign are happy and safe not. Behavior Utilitarian thinks that it is the most important result, so the result prove the rationality of the means. One problem with this is that the means may bring terrible pain and suffering to many people, but if the result is good, then the behavior is still morally good at that time. Action Utilitarianism can be used to prove many horrible things and bad things. There are two types of Utilitarianism: behavioral utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. In action utilitarianism, the principle of utility applies directly to each alternative action in the context of choice. The correct behavior is the behavior that results in the best result (or minimal bad result). In Rule Utilitarianism, utility principles determine the validity of the Code of Conduct (moral principle). Rules for conservative promises were established by casually breaching the world of promises and observing the results of committing to a binding world. Truth is to obey or violate the rules accepted by its utilitarian values. There are several utilitarianisms. But fundamentally, the moral utilitarian approach means that ethical behavior (such as theft) or rules (eg, "keep your promise") are essentially true or false. Conversely, the correctness or erroneous nature of an act or rule is a problem of the overall unethical quality (eg, satisfaction of happiness, happiness, health, knowledge, or personal desire) arising as a result of an act or rule It is only. Overall, according to Utilitarianism, morality is a matter of unethical quality created by moral behavior and regulation, moral responsibility is more dexterous than internal. Morality is a means to reach the opponent, it is by no means an aim.

Utilitarian utilitarianism is related to utility principles summarized mainly by social reformer Jeremy Bentham in 1768. The principle is to apply the "maximum profit number" theory to all possible situations. This theory thinks that it is better to provide maximum amount of happiness and action with minimal pain. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

The classical utilitarianism described by the 17th century philosopher John Stuart Mill believes that the only important thing is happiness and misfortune arising from action; these actions are judged only by their results can. It is correct or wrong, everything else is irrelevant. The theory also points out that everyone's happiness is equally important. According to Mill, correct action is the action to achieve maximum balance of happiness in happiness. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

Utilitarianism is an assertion that all actions must bring the greatest happiness to more people (Bentham, 42). Utilitarianism, however, is not necessarily the foundation of human decision. Because people need to pay attention to their own pain and happiness before consulting others' happiness. I will first explain the argument of utilitarian ideals. Let me explain why this argument is not persuasive. Finally, before you think about others, I will prove why people think of their own happiness. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness' Obligations are different, and their supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. The two ethical theories included in the course are Utilitarianism and Kant's theory. Utilitarianism is a view that the moral value of action depends entirely on the contribution to the overall utility, ie contribution to all abstracts, happiness or happiness (Wikipedia 2009). It is built on the ability to predict the outcome of an action. This theory is also known as "principle of maximum happiness". For Utilitarians, the choice that brings the greatest benefit to most people is a morally right choice. One of the advantages of this ethical theory is that Utilitarians can use a score system to compare similar predicted solutions and decide which choice is more beneficial for more people. Utilitarianism has two types. These theories are action utilitarianism and dominated utilitarianism. Behavior Utilitarianism is the same as the definition of Utilitarian above.

In the work "Utilitarianism" by John Stuart Mill, Mueller offered evidence of his moral theory Utilitarianism and tried to challenge all opposing opinions against it. Mill defines Utilitarianism as "the theory that the theoretical basis is" the behavior is correct because there is a tendency to promote happiness, so it tends to produce reversal of happiness "(chapter 2, page 7 ). He called it the principle of maximum happiness. "In addition to the fact that everyone wants their own well-being, there is no reason why general well-being is desirable, as long as he thinks that it can be achieved. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief. Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarian believes that behavior is morally correct only if action is maximizing (or minimizing what is worst). Classical Utilitarians (and many modern Utilitarians) such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill consider "beauty" as happiness or happiness. Therefore, in this view, behavior is morally correct only if action maximizes happiness or happiness or minimizes pain. Rule Utilitarianism mitigates behavior by establishing moral rules - Utilitarian burden on practical reasoning leads to best results when moral rules follow. Rule Utilitarianism can be explained by the rule "do not kill". In principle, if we all obey the rules, we will be better, that we will have the best results and happenings. Please do not kill. "

Utilitarianism was originally the genre of thought caused by Jeremey Bentham from the late 18th century to the early 19th century. John Stuart Mir continued to shape it into what we know today. Ultimately, Utilitarian thinking seems simple: all actions must be taken for greater profit. But it is obvious that as people deepen this concept more deeply it can only be achieved by the lifestyle that relies on common sense. In the next paragraph we will explore the history of Utilitarianism, the people who formed it, how it leads life, and how it relates to the life of the 21st century. In this article I would like to compare the two types of utilitarianism. It is the theory of systematization by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) in the second half of the 18th century and the philosophy advocated by Peter Singer (1946-), the most obvious contemporary supporter. This is how the latter introduces the former in the "ethics" of Encyclopedia of Britannica: Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) is correctly regarded as a father of contemporary Utilitarianism. At least in theory it is him that he developed the principle of utilitarianism as the basis of a unified comprehensive moral system in every living area. There has never been a complete and detailed ethical system consistently constructed from basic ethical principles. One of the positions of Bentham is honest and frank because it refuses to be confused with traditional morals and sophisticated society's opposition. Under the guidance of Bentham and Sidgwick, Singer proposed a thorough utilitarian argument to determine the moral status. However, given the deep criticism of classical utilitarianism, the utility of singers is subtle. In other words, people are emphasizing the end of enjoying happiness and avoiding pain. The singer's preference for Utilitarianism holds that personal interest depends on that person's preference or value. In addition, in calculating general benefits, all sentient beings' preference gains are equal trade-offs: "The principle of equitably considering profits is like a pair of measures to measure profit fairly. Although combining similar interests, they did not take into account the benefits they were weighing "(1979, p. 19) In the singer 's attack, it rebounded in the 1970' s. As a Bentham Utilitarian tradition philosopher, Singer considers the total amount produced by humans and animals - human and animal - the pain caused in this process - human and animal in all decisions. For him, the interests of humans and animals are equally unimportant. The value of life for humans is far greater than the value of life for living creatures without self-awareness. However, if some people do not do something to severely incompetent children, this should not be done for animals suffering from the same pain. It is a crime similar to racial discrimination for Syndis' s "speciesism" just because it is not a human being but ignores the interests of animals. Calling for a connection between humans and apes, Singer, Goodall etc. are seeking at least these creatures to be released from the experiment

Prior to actions, rule Utilitarians believe in the results of those who follow the rules. If the results are considered to be positive, she may generally think that it is better to follow the rules and will apply it in the future. Behavior Utilitarians treat actions as a single action with a single outcome rather than generalizing behavior. She will have to compare the results of each action Therefore, rule Utilitarianism is considered more practical contrary to the claim of anti - utilitarianism. In other words, it is not the way we want (or possible) every time we measure all possible outcomes. On the other hand, behavior Utilitarians think that it is not a rule applied many times, but rather a wise person can decide what to do by themselves, so the rule utilitarian thinks a little boring. In addition, blindly applying rules to specific situations can result in unpredictable adverse effects that may be avoided by more people who are interested rather than executing programs. At the same time, behavioral Utilitarians are criticized for their dual criteria because they believe that if they obey "good" rules, they are useful and they have the right to decide whether to obediently follow them I will. Status Example: Rules Utilitarian driving at night and watching red cross lights. "If people stick to the rules rather than crossing the red light, it will bring good results, so everyone is safe waiting for a while," she applies this rule to myself and it Wait for it to turn green. At the same time, behavioral Utilitarians said, "Well, I hope that someone who is not me will stick to it according to this rule, but no one around me is influenced by my actions.I am going to take the car It's so dark that you can see the road, so you can cross the road. " Source: Smart has a paper you can find here; I'm sure this is what I learned and what I learned in the seminar. Clever behavior Utilitarianism In Utilitarianism, he seems to give two different expressions of utilitarian standards. The first point of action Utilitarianism, the second point of rule utilitarianism. Behavior and Rules Utilitarianism is concerned with incompatibility of taking morally correct actions and these statements are based on what kind of utilitarianism Miller wants to claim and his moral theory to be consistent It raises a basic question about whether or not. . It is noteworthy that the distinction between rules and action Utilitarianism has not yet been introduced in the Mill era. Therefore, Muller should not be blamed if you do not clearly indicate which of the two methods he claims. The obligation is different; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as promissory notes obligation. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. What is the difference between behavioral utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism? Ethics of the 20th century distinguished between the two versions of this theory. Agents that led to the review of "Utilitarianism" calculated only the results of individual behavior. "Rule Utilitarianism" guides the agent to act according to rules, and happiness is maximized if everyone takes action. Mill acknowledges that there is no time to calculate and weigh the effects of behavior on general happiness before each action (Chapter 2, Chapter 24). Therefore, you need to rely on secondary rules. In fact, they rely on secondary rules to express the general experience of what kind of behavior is universally contributing to the history of happy humanity. Therefore, Utilitarianism seems not to be such a revolutionary proposal. Not all general principles pass the Utilitarian standard test.

Utilitarians face many problems because he lost the ability to live a personal life. This means that Utilitarians must consider the steps leading to the highest level of charity in society when making decisions. Utilitarianism brings the greatest benefit to most people. Two main aspects of Utilitarian rule it. The principle of result - based explanation explains that you must consider the subsequent results when judging the correctness or mistake of an action. For discussions between Utilitarians and dentists see JJC Smart and Bernard Williams published in 1973, "Utilitarianism: For and Against" and Samuel Schaeffler's 1988 results collection. Doctrine and its critics. Ethics textbooks and readers need to provide appropriate explanation of the contrast between these two important ethical theories. Finally, virtue ethics can be traced back to the era of an ancient philosopher Plato (429 - 347 BC). Ethical work is Nicoma's morality (publication date of ancient works is unknown). Modern virtue ethicists include Philippa Foot, Michael Slote and Julia Annas. Bernard Williams (1929-2003) played an important role in philosophy ethics in the second half of the 20th century. He refused to organize the moral code into a moral theory, that is, the view that philosophical thought to Cantianism and (most importantly) utilitarianism and other ethics is indispensable. It was caught by theory. He is also an important contributor to moral psychology, personal identity, equality, moral and emotional discussion, and to the interpretation of philosophers such as Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Descartes, Aristotle and Plato It is also an important contributor.

JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a nonprofit organization that supports academic institutions to use digital technology to protect academic records and promote research and education in a sustainable way. © 2000-2018 ita ka. Copyright JSTOR®, JSTOR logo, JPASS®, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA. Artstor® is a registered trademark of Artstor Inc. ITHAKA is an authorized dealer of Artstor Inc. Raskolnikov 's reasoning reflects to some extent the difference between utilitarian arguments and non - utilitarian arguments. I doubt if she agrees with the plan even though Raskolnikov could prove to her old lady that her death is a morally correct decision based on utilitarianism. She will ignore her personal suffer so infrequently, but she is offset by the positive result of her murder. A non-utilitarian will argue that even if it is covered by greater joy, it can not simply ignore the pain factors. Utilitarianism of essay.com/Utilitarianism, Mill applies to "crime and punishment", is well organized, and understands Mill's theory well. Utilitarianism, Mill's utilitarianism is applied to 'crime and punishment' which is well organized and well understood Mill's theory Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral belief, aimed at improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics In this article I will explain how and why Kant's moral theory and Utilitarianism differ and let's discuss why Kant's theory seems to bring rational morality ... In that philosophy, utilitarianism provides natural law. Replacing the Theory and Social Contract Place the authority of the government and the dignity of individual rights above its usefulness or measure the happiness it receives. As for the doctrine of equalism, everyone's happiness is equal, rationality of utilitarianism and relatively direct nature provide a model attractive for democratic governments. In its political philosophy, Utilitarianism is based on the use of government authority and the sanctity of individual rights and therefore provides alternatives to natural law, natural rights or social contract theory. Therefore, it is best to become a question of what kind of government gives the best results. This evaluation requires a virtual premise concerning human nature and behavior. Utilitarian aid for democracy is generally a way of matching the interests of the government with the general interests and they are usually the greatest reason why everyone is the best judge of their welfare, Individual freedom They believe in the possibility and desirability of advancing social change through a peaceful political process

Utilitarianism, J. S. Muller explains why you must observe the principle of utilitarianism. This doctrine is also known as the greatest principle of happiness, which provides the greatest happiness for most people. More specifically, Utilitarianism believes that for all individuals affected by action, the consequence of believing that the correct behavior is to produce the maximum net utility, "the sum of the happy sum minus the sum of the pain" It is a kind of principle (Joy, lecture) 03/30 Note) In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world. In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of action utilitism is "What special results are expected for X?" (Fali). Society must always obey the rules

Rule Utilitarianism is more desirable than behavioral utilitarianism. Classical Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory, we believe that actions can only be regarded as morally correct, and as a result we believe that the maximum number of benefits will be brought ("Good" means from happiness To draw pain). Likewise, behavior is morally wrong and it does not work to the utmost. Since the first interpretation of Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Muller in the second half of the 19th century, the classical method of utilitariy is the basis of many other resultual theories such as rule utilitariy and action utilitarianism . Focus on (driver, In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism More ... See more content Rule Utilitarianism is better than behavioral Utilitarianism? Classical Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory, we believe that actions can only be regarded as morally correct, and as a result we believe that the maximum number of benefits will be brought ("Good" means from happiness To draw pain). Likewise, behavior is morally wrong and it does not work to the utmost. From the late nineteenth century Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Mill first explained in detail about it. Examination of important features of Utilitarianism (21) The theory of doctrine is based on the concept of practicality, the theory of usefulness. Utilitarianism is a moral system that allows us to make the most useful ones in various situations and results. Different utilitarian ethical methods each have their own excellent theory and a community that cares about individuals.

Utilitarianism, J. S. Muller explains why you must observe the principle of utilitarianism. This doctrine is also known as the greatest principle of happiness, which provides the greatest happiness for most people. More specifically, Utilitarianism believes that for all individuals affected by action, the consequence of believing that the correct behavior is to produce the maximum net utility, "the sum of the happy sum minus the sum of the pain" It is a kind of principle (Joy, lecture) 03/30 Note) In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world. In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of action utilitism is "What special results are expected for X?" (Fali). Society must always obey the rules

Utilitarian utilitarianism of Mil is a result-oriented moral theory, which means that the morals of our actions are judged by the results they bring. According to Utilitarianism, all our actions should promote happiness. For Mill, happiness is fun and there is no pain. In this article I will explain Mill's reaction to opposition to Utilitarianism applied only to pigs and to the opposite. People who reject this moral theory would say that Utilitarianism does not give humans sufficient life value compared to pigs. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. Mill's Utilitarianism (1861) is an extended interpretation of utilitarian moral theory. In response to the criticism of doctrine, Muller not only approved Jeremy Bentham's basic principle but also made some major improvements to its structure, importance and application. Advances in moral philosophy are limited by infinite controversy over the reality and nature of the best profit, but Moore believes that everyone thinks that the outcome of human behavior will make a significant contribution to their moral value I believe from the beginning that I can do it. (Utilitarianism 1) Responsible Mueller needs to solve various fields of Utilitarian view. In his central details of the Utilitarian standards of Chapter 2, Muller promises to utilize Utilitarianism in multiple clauses. In the same chapter, he focuses on the happiness of action and makes the rules an important role in moral reasoning. Both are used to make him a rule of utilitarian doctrine. However, as these claims can be harmonized with direct utilitarianism, there is no reason to deviate from the utilitarian interpretation of the traditional behavior of this chapter. But in chapter 5, Moore introduced indirect utilitarianism into sanctioned utilitarian doctrine. In the concept of Muller's responsibility, it is difficult to match these direct and indirect factors.

"Rule - Utilitarianism does not see the effect of a specific action, but decides the correctness of behavior through different methods First, the best code of conduct can be found.This is the value of the result of obeying a particular action The initial supporters were John Austin (Law School 1832) and John Stuart Mill (Utilitarian 1861). One problem with rule Utilitarianism is that it invites us to consider the results of general follow-up of specific rules. Suppose that the general follow-up result of rule R is optimal. Rule R is the best rule and everyone should follow this rule. But what if people are unlikely to follow this rule normally? Example: The optimal traffic rule in each country is correct. According to the rule of utilitarianism, I should keep it right. Let's say that I am in the UK and people are usually on the left side ... Do I really want to stick to the right side? Another problem is that the best rule is not simple. The best rule of commitment is to maintain. "Always follow your promise, except ..." (exception list will be long). This led American philosopher David Lyon to assert in 1965 that in the form and boundary of Utilitarianism, the rational expression of rule utilitariy would recommend the same behavior behavioral Utilitarianism. And there is no real difference between them. At the moment, the rule - Utilitarian formula seems to be preferred, but some people try to recover them. " This problem is more complicated as the rule interpretation of Utilitarianism is different. In the powerful rule we call Utilitarianism, moral rules are no exception. In utilitarian we call weak rules, there are some exceptions to the rule. The more exceptions we have established with moral rules, the weaker the rule Utilitarians of our version. However, if you give enough exceptions to moral rules, rule utilitariy can become indistinguishable from behavioral utilitarianism. Let's think about the traffic light once again. This rule maximizes utility compared to most other rules, so a strict rule utilitarian says "do not pass the traffic light". Compared to the rule of "when you want to pass through the traffic light" or "when you are sure to pass the traffic light without accident", it works very well. Actions and Rules The problem between Utilitarians mainly focuses on the question "Will moral life improve by practicing selective obedience to moral rules?" Action The Utilitarian's answer is yes. . Rule Utilitarians believe that moral life depends on moral rules and without these rules the net utility will decrease. Utilitarians think that whether moral rules are binding will depend on the situation. Consequently, behavioral Utilitarians view moral rules as mere "rules of thumb", the general guiding principles apply to exceptions, and rule-based Utilitarians view moral rules as clearer . We will study the problems of the two Utilitarians in a short time. Let's see the most common problem of utilitarianism this time. The obligation is different; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as promissory notes obligation. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism.

In this article, John Stuart Mill, moderator of the most compelling action and utilization theory (AU), could not cope with the moral complexity problem finally due to moral complexity I will argue. It affects their virtues and their influence on specific behavioral motives. The central discussion of John Stuart Mill follows many of the theories established by Jeremy Bentham. By combining the concept of result - basedism, the result of action is the only element in moral evaluation, and hedonism indicates that it is the only element to consider the essential value of the entire product. In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism More ... See more content Utilitarianism is a morally correct moral theory that produces the greatest happiness (hedonistic utilitarianism) or happiness (happiness utilitarianism). While some Utilitarians (behavioral Utilitists) argue that we should compare and consider the impact of each individual's behavior, while others (who control stakeholders) I believe that the impact of the adoption of the Code of Conduct should be considered. Socially responsible students will show their ethical significance for the greater society and the relationship with the many social forces that build the world in which they live. From an ethical point of view, students will be able to shape their responsibilities in life support relationships and shape social forces that build their world.

The mathematical evaluation of Raskolnikov's moral dilemma proposed in Dostoevsky's "Sin and Punishment" reflects utilitarianism of utilitarianism. Utilitarian attempts to distinguish between good and evil by measuring decisions based on calculated values. Raskolnikov combines the negative impact of killing his old landlord and the positive benefits that her money brings to society, using fundamental principles of utilitarianism. However, the assertion that killing an old lady of Las Colignikov can be considered moral is angry with a true utilitarian supporter The mathematical evaluation of Raskolnikov's moral dilemma proposed in Dostoevsky's "Sin and Punishment" reflects utilitarianism of utilitarianism. Utilitarian attempts to distinguish between good and evil by measuring decisions based on calculated values. Raskolnikov seemed to adopt the fundamental principle of utilitarian and combined the negative impact of killing his old landlord with free rent and caught audience. The city provides rent and the doctor provides nursing care, but all benefits. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the view that morally correct behavior is the act of creating the best social utility under the present circumstances. Behavior Utilitarianism only takes into account the outcome or result of a single act. In contrast, rule Utilitarianism defines the highest moral position of society as the highest moral norm. Utilitarian punishment justification theory is opposed to the "retaliation" theory, which is designed to "punish" criminals by criminals. According to Utilitarians, the reason for punishment is to fully reform criminals or to protect society from further crime, to prevent others from committing crimes afraid of punishment. In its political philosophy, utilitarianism is based on the use of government authority and the sanctity of individual rights and therefore provides alternatives to natural law, natural rights or social contract theory. Therefore, what type of government is best to become the type of government that will produce the best results - this assessment requires de facto assumptions about human nature and behavior.

All college students who wish to graduate must select a major. Some people decide major in high school, others think in general what they want to do at university, but I will not decide my major before attending a course that I am interested in. Unfortunately, I did not choose major, and I had to pick it up at the end of the semester to apply again. I would like to choose the most ethical and helpful occupation. But without the philosophy of moral goodness, I noticed that it was pretty difficult to choose this majors. According to my experience, most of the most ethical choice theory of discussion is inspired by some form of utilitarianism. To be honest, I always think that utilitarianism is boring and frustrating. It simplifies thought experiments and moral dilemmas to mathematics. It eliminates important body components and makes thinking experiments very interesting. I like Utilitarians for economists. The latter is economically traded, the former being traded on "utility" (usually understood as happiness). When they became simple calculations, I stopped enjoying thought experiments. Can you confirm that the utility is restricted? Or is this a huge assumption? In my teens and college years, this problem bothered me. At that age, when I announced my major and tried to select my career, it was long and was knitted at night of insomnia. However, as far as possible, we can not find the "most important answer". I think that this is impossible - a few lucky few rituals are blessed with lightning or are blessed with the clarity of worn paths. So I began to speculate that this seemed to work quite well. Daniel Gilbert shows us in his book "Stumbling in Happiness". Humans are not good at predicting what makes us happy in the future For example, if you ask "Do you want to eat Greek cuisine in 3 weeks?" You can infer your feelings well. But if I ask you, you will be more accurate, "Do you want to eat Greek cuisine tonight?" Okay, I am going to college. I never published my major when I entered community college for the first time, but I will be in English major. I hate reading and writing, so this is an interesting choice. I think that I like the idea of ​​writing. That's enough for me. Since I have to choose my course, college feels like a new beginning. What I am doing touches me completely. Okay, I will return to college. This time I am majoring in computer science. Since I was 13 years old, I've been programming and programming with my computer, so it's a natural feeling. Despite their experiences (which we can not prove), they will not let me skip the introduction of the Java course. I finished the semester with As and Bs. I participated in the data structure course in the next semester. I think that this is boring, and the professor does not really care what she is taught. This may seem to be the time I dropped out of school again, but you are wrong.

Regardless of how AU results are applied, whatever the life can be saved, a reasonable existence can be seen, but since David is killing innocent individuals as unjust and moral errors, AU It is not a correct moral theory. This can be expressed as follows - if AU is true, David should kill healthy patients and transplant his organs. It is a mistake that David kills healthy patients and transplants their organs. Therefore AU is false. AU opponents use this example to emphasize how the AU produces fraud and brings the moral consequences of a moral dilemma. One of the first arguments against Utilitarianism is the time and effort necessary to apply it to each situation. Bentham himself has planned how to use the theory. Only one person starts measuring, then the value of each pleasure, the second is the value of each pain, and the third is the first happy fertility and impurities. . The first pain, the value of each pain that occurred in the fourth time, this is the 5th time to create all the pain and happiness of balance sheet, impurity of the first pleasure of fever and first pleasure. If happiness, if balance is painful, actions will bring good and bad trends, and the process repeats to the number of people affected (finally) by actions Utilitarianism has support and disagreement. Because there is a difference between two different types of utilitarianism, it also has another "out". Behavior Utilitarian examines the moral value of each action, but rule utilitarian creates a general value of moral value. Rule Utilitarianism helps to answer some of the negative elements of utilitarianism? It definitely solves the problem of time. By dominating Utilitarianism, you no longer need to consider all his moves. There are general guidelines covering everyday situations In this article we use both Utilitarianism and behavioral utilitarianism to decipher their reactions to abortion, investigate both arguments, if utilitarianism is sufficient to discuss, behavioral utilitarianism And rule Utilitarianism. Conclusion Settle the problem of abortion. First, Utilitarianism is defined as "only when improving overall happiness over other options available when action is morally correct" (Falley). Overall happiness can also be used interchangeably through words, happiness, happiness, happiness. Utilitarians have two types, the first of which is behavioral utilitarianism, in which they seek the most profit generating behavior. Behavior Utilitarianism depends on the outcome of certain actions rather than expectation. The main argument of action utilitism is "What special results are expected for X?" (Fali). Society must always obey the rules

Utilitarianism and Kant Ethics are part of philosophy and will be studied forever, and like most topics of philosophy, no one will be deemed identical. With so many cultures, there are many different beliefs about people's lifestyle. Religion, poverty and mental health all contribute to our belief in morality. Some people think that these factors should be the mental condition of the person and the motive of the perpetrator when sentences are given. Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral belief, aimed at improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics In this article, I explain how and why Kant's moral theory and utilitarianism differ, why Kant's theory thinks to provide a more rational ethical assertion I will explain. Replacing Natural Law Theory and Social Contract The sanctity of government authority and individual rights is based on measuring its usefulness or happiness. As an egalitarian doctrine, everyone has equality of happiness, utilitarian rationality and relatively direct nature provide an attractive model for democratic governments. In the last semester, I was assigned to write the last essay on utilitarianism and Kant's ethics. I have to study and evaluate the work of two philosophers, Jeremy Bentham and Emmanuel Kant. These two philosophers have studied the essence of morality long ago, and they formed two different theories of moral philosophy. Jeremy Bentham is today known for his principle of utilitarianism and the principle of utilitariy evaluates actions based on these results. He thinks that deed is considered "fair" if that act directly or indirectly brings the greatest happiness and the least suffering to the largest number of people affected. Bentham defines utility as any property in an object that tends to produce utility, beauty, happiness, or happiness, or to avoid the painful and unfortunate events of the party considering the interest. Therefore Utilitarianism is based on an understanding of the correct behavior of the outcome. (Wolf) In order to better understand what is considered "good", a comparison between Utilitarianism, Kant's morality and moral theory of nursing ethics and moral behavior, and these different ways for nature for us Role as a concept of human rights. Morality is based on the motives and intent behind behavior, the morality of action is not a real result, but a moral approach. This concept is based on responsibility and principles and includes human rights issues. Emmanuel Kant believes that there is an obligation to adhere to "good" as a human being in an unconditional sense. It should be good for what seems inherently correct, and hence it should not be changed as someone thinks it is wrong.

"A difficult age" is a wonderful story, but when people think about the reality behind the work, the novel becomes a masterpiece. Because Utilitarianism is the main idea of ​​the Victorian era, this novel is very important. Utilitarianism, "The form of freedom and equality that will create the greatest happiness depends on education, politics, economics, social structure" (Harris). Everything is explained by logic and facts. The reader can easily find out that Dickens was teasing this theory, but the exciting thing is how he achieved it through the role. Dickens' industrialization and Utilitarianism Charles Dickens of difficult times used his virtual town of the Hard Times to express the British industrialization of those days. However, most of these symptoms are not explained exactly compared to the actual situation of the industrialization process. - The Impact of William Blake's Industrialization William Black's London "London" is an example of black disapproval of the changes that occurred during his life. In his work 'Song of Experience', Black explains the industrial revolutionary dilemma in his poem "London" he brought to himself and the destruction of the relationship between ordinary people and land. He stated that Thames and the streets of the street are dominated by "privileged" or commercial interests, he calls "handcuffs for psychomotorism", and on the face of everyone is "a trace of weakness, of sorrow There was a trace ". We talked about "every cry of everyone" and "voice of fear of every baby". Finally, Utilitarian bombs of Victorian England existed in difficult times of Dickens. Doug Gradgrind described by Dickens is a "very practical" person (8) who is trapped in facts and is convinced that the only way to live is reason. Emotions, imagination, loss of mind, facts and reasons are not the only things. As this education is totally unhappy, he raised children through this philosophy and its consequences. In today's world, schools pay excessive attention to science and facts. It is ridiculous to think that religious discussion is not allowed. Why are they doing this? If we are allowed to teach and discuss scientific customs or more specific Darwinism then why then ban religious discussions? After all, today's Darwinism itself is almost regarded as religion. Is it because these religions are based on faith rather than facts? Of course this seems like Utilitarianism to me. Only facts, nothing else

John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more reasonable solution to the fairness of every government. A general social contract theory, including Rawls' perspective, is that in a society where self-interest, rationality, and equality are established, rules of justice are established by mutually reinforcing things. Political philosopher John Rawls uses the Utilitarian view of Bentham and Mill, the concept of social contract of John Rock, and the concept of absolute command of Kant. "Even if we can not exceed happiness of society as a whole, everyone has force majeure based on justice.Therefore, justice denies losing freedom Kant against building Kant's justice in an absolute way The moral proposition which denied the moral interest of Mr. His view is clearly reconfirmed in political liberalism and the society is "a system of fair cooperation from one generation to the next as time goes by" It is seen. John Rolls and Utilitarian Heath C. Hawklock John Rawls' social contract theory challenges Utilitarianism by pointing out an impractical theory. In the Utilitarian society, civil rights can be completely ignored if corruption against this citizen benefits others in society. Rawls believes that social contract theory similar to that proposed by Hobbes, Rock, Rousseau is a more logical solution to the fairness of all governments. Since its introduction in 1971, John Rawls's "justice" has become classical. The author has modified the original to remove some of the difficulties encountered by him and others in the original book. Rawls's purpose is to express an important part of the common core of democratic tradition - justice as fairness - to provide an alternative to utilitarianism which has dominated Anglo-Saxon's political thought tradition since the 19th century It is that. Rolls replaced the ideal of social contract with a more satisfying explanation of the basic rights of citizens as freedom and equality and freedom. "Everyone" wrote that "Even if it can not exceed the happiness of society as a whole, it has an invincible sense based on justice." That theory advancing Rawls, Lewis, Lincoln's ideas is as powerful as it was first announced.

This moral form was founded by Jeremy Bentham, and "Utilitarianism" comes from "utility", which means usefulness. Utilitarian thinks the outcome of the bill is a true measure of its quality. Because this theory emphasizes the means of endings, it is a theory of purpose or result theory of ethics. Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utility: act in this way, targeting the largest number of maximum foods First of all, Utilitarians seem obvious to oppose the death penalty as it leads to extreme distress for criminals. However, if this pain is offset by a positive result, that pain is justified. The death penalty can help to cut off criminality because it can stop future criminals. If a criminal receives death penalty, you will not be able to commit further crimes that contribute to social security. The family members of the victims are also comforted and the death penalty imposed on the murderers will end them. After all, if this is the most preferred way to make society a more happy place for most people, then Utilitarians will agree to the death penalty. The most common defense of the death penalty is based on utilitarian reasons. For Utilitarians, punishment is generally reasonable only if it produces a greater balance of happiness and misfortune. The death penalty is justified by preventing criminals from repeating the crime, or by stopping criminals from deterring the crime. Both of these contribute to a greater balance of social well-being. There are several direct problems with this reasoning. First, the burden of proof is on the advocate of the death penalty, indicating that the same effect can not be achieved with less punishment (such as life imprisonment). Utilitarian aim is to reduce happiness as much as possible, and this is particularly important as it is necessary to impose two penalties if the other conditions are the same. The second and more fundamental problem of utilitarian death penalty defense includes the fact finding process The second and more fundamental question of the utilitarian defense of the death penalty is related to the fact finding process. His argument should be supported by empirical evidence, since Utilitarians are de facto asserting about the beneficial social impact of the death penalty. In the absence of such reliable empirical evidence, the Utilitarian position must be dismissed. There are two types of "evidence evidence": case evidence and scientific evidence. Case evidence includes independent findings that seem to relate to the two situations, in which case it is an improvement of the death penalty and the social situation. Given the death penalty issue, the seriousness of people's lives, evidence of anecdotes is not enough to establish a causal relationship between the death penalty and social condition improvement. Instead, scientific research is necessary. Both sides are also affected by this discussion

It is illegal to provide records, wrong company income to management team, shareholders, IRS. Therefore, in this case, Alex must comply with the law and take corrective measures according to the law. The ethical implication of this case is the result of correct action for those involved in the situation. This article analyzes the theory of virtue ethics, behavioral utilitism, and Kant's professional ethics based on the scenario given in this case and assumes that people representing these theories recommend Alex as correct . The primitive history of utilitarianism dates back to the 17th century British moralists, including Richard Cumberland and John Gay. Early utilitarians thought that the materialist Hervetius, who claimed that interests relied on judgment and emphasized the importance of education in the formation of human souls, and confused morals are usually compatible with utilities Yes. (For details on utilitarian pioneering, see, for example, Rosen 2003, Driver 2009) At the most common level, there are two ways to understand the moral status, or what others sometimes call "moral standpoint" or "moral consideration". In the Utilitarian approach (see entrance to the utilitarian history), the term moral consideration (they prefer) refers to the interests of people considered in the calculus (for example, human happiness, the strength of pain, Time etc). Factors that determine which actions provide the most utility. In a non-utilitarian approach, the moral status is due to reasons to behave for the company or its interests, which may be contradictory prior to the calculations necessary to obtain overall best results. . Utilitarians can combine these two concepts by arguing that they correctly incorporate their interests in utilitarian calculations, if they do not, they will make the entity mislead. This book is an excellent introduction to the main moral concepts and theories. In this section I will explain Utilitarian theory and its history in a very concise and clear manner, and examples of practical methods provided by Utilitarianism in two case studies. In Part 2, we will discuss some arguments against this theory, and some ways that you can modify the classical utilitarianism and answer satisfactorily to them.

Utilitarianism originally introduced by Jeremy Bentham and extended by John Stuart Mill (Mark Timmons, 2006) pointed out that it is good to bring maximum happiness to most people based on the results of action Moral theory is. . Utilitarian thinks that the good thing for most people is the ultimate solution. Not everyone stops their own profits. Utilitarianism focuses on the possibility of decision making. I start with my first premise; for what to be cloned, it should have a specific purpose that will improve the whole society. This is based on JS Mill's Utilitarian maximum happiness principle. ) The scientist trying to do was not thinking about the possible outcomes of such experiments. In this case, by combining species that are not intended to combine with mammoth like African elephant's fur, we can cause serious damage, which is easily avoided. There are several reasons why these fur-like mammoths were extinct 12,000 years ago. Utilitarianism, J. S. Muller explains why you must observe the principle of utilitarianism. This doctrine is also known as the greatest principle of happiness, which provides the greatest happiness for most people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a kind of resultism that all individuals affected by actions believe that the right behavior is the maximum net utility, ie, the act of "total happiness amount - total pain amount" Joyce)

Why Muller distinguishes between high pleasure and low pleasure and evaluates whether he has achieved his goal. In his article, the Utilitarian Institute detailed the utilitarianism as a moral theory and answered that misunderstanding. Utilitarianism in the word of Mill is a view that behavior is correct because there is a tendency to promote happiness and mistakes because there is a tendency to produce reversal of happiness. 1 Therefore, Utilitarianism provides answers to basic questions. Ethics are worried: 'How to live?' 'Or' What is the good or the right way to live? ' Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

The definition of John Stuart Mill and Utilitarian utilitarianism is that all arguments should be judged on the basis of their ability to promote maximum personal happiness. In other words, Utilitarianism believes that good brings greatest happiness to most people. John Stuart Mill developed a practical developer based on our decisions but stated that whatever the outcome, the decision should be useful to as many people as possible. Mill said they should compare the results and make decisions based on beneficial results for most people. "Utilitarianism" of John Stuart Mill is a classical interpretation and defense of utilitarianism in morality. This article first appeared in a series of three articles published in 1961 Fraser magazine, these articles were gathered and reprinted as a book in 1863. The purpose of Muller in this book is to explain that utilitarianism explains why it is the best moral theory and that it is to protect it from all kinds of criticism and misunderstanding. Until the life and age of Mir have been severely criticized, Utilitarian worked a lot in promoting Utilitarian ethics, and "The philosophical detail of the 19th century's most free humanitarian ethics" . John Stuartmir's "practical" ethical theory and Immanuel Kant's "sorting order" ethical theory. According to utilitarianism, euthanasia is morally justified, and according to Kantism, euthanasia is morally irrational; however, I lead these two positions to their particular position Argued that it is due to a large defect inherent in inference. There is no suitable solution to this problem. According to Utilitarianism, morality is mainly of the kind ... the theory behind Utilitarianism is that if the it does not promote happiness or joy, the behavior of a person that it is wrong promotes happiness and happiness This is the case. The point of this theory is the principle of utility, "maximum happiness to the people who should be the most". (Palmer) Jeremy Bentham basically brought it to the name of Utilitarianism. I pay more attention than those before him The dominant philosophy of Britain in the 1800s was Utilitarianism developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarians believe that the greatest happiness is a trial of good and evil for most people. They believe that all existing social systems, in particular law and government, have to be changed to satisfy the greatest happiness trials. In "Women's obedience" (1869), Muller wrote that legal subordination of women to men should be replaced by "the principle of perfect equality". This idea was revolutionary in the Mill era.

In Mill's utilitarianism, he explained the definition of happiness and misfortune with the principle of maximum happiness. The principle of maximum happiness is that if behavior promotes happiness action is reasonable and when promoting the opposite of happiness it is wrong. Happiness occurs when there are elements of happiness and lack of pain. The element of happiness itself is the ultimate one, the only thing is good. Happiness without a higher lifestyle creates happiness, so it will make up other events and experiences to a certain extent. The fundamental principles of John Mill's utilitarianism and Emanuel Kant's moral metaphysics suggest different views of the two philosophers about the field of moral philosophy. Compared to Kant 's metaphysical segmentation and its use in proof of validity and error, Mill' s utilitarianism is a more sophisticated ethical theory. Kant takes his confirmation of metaphysical survival as discipline of his moral philosophy. If the law has moral power it will be the foundation. Explain what is utilitarian utilitarianism. What kind of procedures should Utilitarians take when determining a series of actions? What is the difference between Million's Utilitarianism and Bentham? Why does Mill act according to utilitarianism? Next, I will explain how to think Kant's criticism against Mill as a utilitarian. Finally, I will evaluate the credibility of this criticism. Eat factory - meat on farm. Explain the main argument of Alasdair Norcross on why it is morally wrong to eat meat on the factory farm. Then explain what Kant is based on this argument, what Epicurean is based for this argument, and how Norcross reacts to them. Evaluate next: what do you agree with (if any) and why? Do you think that it is ethically acceptable to eat meat raised in the factory? Mill is considered to be one of the great classics of Utilitarianism, but this moral theory deviates from the central characteristics of many philosophers thought by modern philosophers. This explains why Mueller is a more serious practical problem than the initial inspection (see Coope 1998). The problem was caused by an understanding of Utilitarian era error and may reply that abandoning a philosopher who blamed the modern philosophy for the 19th century would disappear. However, this correspondence simplifies the problem too much. It is not clear whether Mill's theory of value has truly hedonism (see Brink 1992). As mentioned above, Mill thinks hedonism is a distinguishing feature of Utilitarianism; if he is not a hedonicist he will not have utilitarianism according to his own definition.

The philosophy provides many moral, ethical books and discussions. One of these works is the concept of Utilitarianism. One of the most outstanding theories of Utilitarian writer John Stuart Mill. He can be regarded as a moral guide of utilitarianism. He has now crossed the relationship with the famous movie "Matrix" for writing utility. In the movie, people living in virtual reality are full of a certain struggle for survival in the real world, where they are relatively happy and contented. This book as a whole focuses on the utilitarian philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Mill called Utilitarianism "maximum amount of maximum happiness". Men seek happiness through the influence of others. This is the reason for creating society. According to Mill, happiness of people is constantly changing. I agree with Muller, because others will always influence people, but he can still be a person or unite. But who should say that people should obey and have to order / unify. No, because he has a free will, that is why morality plays a role in the theory of influence. The dominant philosophy of Britain in the 1800s was Utilitarianism developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarians believe that the greatest happiness is a trial of good and evil for most people. They believe that all existing social systems, in particular law and government, have to be changed to satisfy the greatest happiness trials. In "Women's obedience" (1869), Muller wrote that legal subordination of women to men should be replaced by "the principle of perfect equality". This idea was revolutionary in the Mill era. Jeremy · Bentham spread (Jeremy · Bentham) dissemination John · Stuart · Mill (John · Stuart · Mill) Creating a Utilitarian philosophy "Benthamism" with a major change to his successor "Utilitarianism" is a word. Utilitarianism "I believe he is using it for the first time", but in 1861 Mueller acknowledged in the footnote, "In word, he did not invent it, instead he From John Goole 1821 Novel "An outdated expression to use in that diocesan almanac, Mir seemed not to recognize Bentham's use He wrote a letter In 1781 and in his 1802 year's letter by George Wilson The term Étienne Dumont "is Utilitarianism."

John Stuart Mill's utilitarian John Stuart Miller translates morality into a practical problem in utilitarianism. His moral theory is aimed at helping people evaluate his moral principles and appeal and to judge conflicts in moral conflict. Mill believes that behavior is right as they tend to promote happiness and reduce pain. This theory is expressed as a legitimate promotion of happiness. Moral "right" behavior is to bring maximum happiness and pain relief to most people. Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief.

Evaluating the merit of utilitarianism (24 points) Utilitarianism is a theory designed to define a simple foundation that can be applied when making moral decisions. It is based on human instincts seeking happiness and avoiding pain. Jeremy · Bentham is widely regarded as a father of utilitarianism. He was born in 1748 as a family member of lawyers and also participated in training in this industry. But in the process, he was disappointed with the establishment of British law in the country and began to reform the system into a perfect system based on "the principle of happiness the greatest". Morally good " Jeremy Bentham is the father of utilitarianism. I will refuse all movements that can not be quantified, such as the order of the universe, mankind, precedents. These concepts are unreasonable, morality is superstition. "... ... There is no reason in the ancient times" (legislative principle). Utilitarians developed a rational model to evaluate practice and beliefs, ignoring non-quantitative concepts based on "maximum amount of maximum happiness". Not dependent on quality: What is fun? "Better" can not be counted, so it is not a problem. In this article we will introduce the main functions of Utilitarianism, decide Utilitarian problems and make it unacceptable to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham established Utilitarianism. He lives in an era of major change. With the French and American revolution, people demanded human rights and greater democracy. Bentham is working on amending the law. Utilitarianism is related to the principle of utility. Utility means satisfaction or different obligation; its supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. Historically, Utilitarians have used the term "utility" rather than "welfare", and the utility was defined as happiness, happiness or preference. Jeremy · Bentham, the father of Utilitarian history, said that happy experience is of essential value and that all others contribute a pleasant experience or have valuable value to avoid pain I believe. His intellectual heir, John Stuart Mill, extends this essential value theory including happiness and realization. However, since Kenneth Arrow, modern philosophers tend to think that intrinsic value is palatable, that is to say that individuals have what they want. Thus, for example, the principle of assigning economic benefits to preferential utilists is to assign them to maximize their benefits.

Both have elements of quantitative theory, because Bentham has distinctive calculus and Kant has "goodwill + responsibility = ethical behavior". Utilitarianism is the theory of assertion, morality is based on the results and Kant's theory is based on intention (duty) Kant ignores emotions, and Peter Singer says the preference as part of emotion is an important part of ethical decision-making. Militarism can be applied to any situation, and Kant says unethical instructions (hypothesized instructions) are useless. They do not have many sharing theories, they are generally very different theories as they all pay attention to different elements of morality. In 1993, Coward pointed out that there are three ethical theories that can be used to discuss the greenhouse effect. The theory is Utilitarianism, Kant ethics, moral ethics. Utilitarianism This is a well-designed theory that states that people usually take into consideration the harm and interests of their actions. This theory thinks that giving good things is important and extremely useful in our lives, but creating bad things is harmful and it is not needed in our lives Hmm. Theory emphasizes the maximization of social benefits Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics can be defined as "consciously reflecting our moral beliefs for the purpose of improving, expanding or completing these beliefs in some way". Two theories on the essence of human ethics This article explains how Kant's moral theory and utilitarian differ and why it differs and explains why Kant's theory thinks it brings a more rational morality . Substitution of theory and social contract Place the dignity of government authority and individual rights on its usefulness or measure the happiness it receives. As for the doctrine of equalism, everyone's happiness is equal, rationality of utilitarianism and relatively direct nature provide a model attractive for democratic governments.