Extreme rationalism rationalism is the idea that we can gain knowledge only through the process of mind. Empiricism is the idea that knowledge can only be gained through sensation. Because it is the basis of the scientific way of life we ​​use, the Western world employs empiricism. Various common proverbs such as "I believe in seeing" and "listening with my ears" indicate that we have accepted the use of sensations without a doubt. "Their extreme rationalism is a completely irrational creature through" observation "of all" reasonable "motives. If you obey the contrary or commit suicide, obey the urge. Topic 9: conquest of nature by humans is the consequence of nature by nature, that is, the natural impulse of the conditioner is the result of "human" including the conditioner itself. Masculinity - unconscious nature dominates regulators and dominates all humans through them. After political drama dust settled in the second half of the 18th century the extreme rationalism and skepticism supported by the Enlightenment reached that limit. Some people do not want to see humanity through a reasonable microscope. Romanticism came as an antidote. The era from Newton 's "Principia" ended in 1798 with the publication of "Sentimental Song" by Wordsworth and Coleridge. Among them, the poet wrote: "Not the wisdom, but the deep power of happiness, we see the things of life." The experience of "absurd world" has created a new kind of extreme rationalism that separates such thought style from all fascist thought. However, the new rationalism ignores systematization. Thoughts are temporarily placed between "absurd feelings" and their understanding, art, and philosophy. Here, part of it: Camus refuses the existence of philosophy: the latter "interprets" the mysteries, streamlines ridiculous things, and distorts that reality. For him, the only complete performance lays a stupid life, while artistic creation rejects rationalization ("raisonner Ie concret") and covers up "nonsense ith image" ("Ce qui n" On the other hand, Sartre is trying to develop "experience" into a specific human existence philosophy: there is no appeal to explain the structure "in an absurd world" and "ethics of ethics" .

There are two main thoughts or methodologies on the subject of epistemology: rationalism and empiricism. These two completely different schools of thought are trying to answer philosophical questions about how to acquire knowledge. Rationalists believe that this process is entirely within our head, but experientists believe that it will be achieved through sensory experience. After reading and understanding each discussion it is clear that empiricism is the most relative descriptive position in epistemology. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Then, please argue, rationalism and empiricism, sum. The fact that philosophers can be rationalists or empiricists was traditionally used in the classification system commonly used in the history of philosophy, especially Kant's description in the first half of the 17th to the 17th century It affects the classification system. . Therefore, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were erroneously regarded as applying rational core epistemology to a common metaphysical agenda, Rock, Berkeley, and Hume erroneously reached a gradual rejection of their metaphysical claims It was regarded, and everyone consciously tried to improve his predecessor's efforts.

For this critical analytical article, I wrote in the following discussion article: "Rationalism comes from empiricism rather than empiricism, empiricism has data and research to support the assertion Perhaps rationalism uses the example of our textbook through reasons to prove the desired evidence, the number 2 will never be larger than the number 3 - it is merely illogical and it says to think about It does not make sense either a priori or the former means that you do not actually have to go through a number 3 larger than 2 (the nature of the numbers is a gray area). One reason why rationality and empiricism has been going on for centuries is that both methods interfere with acquiring knowledge in some way. Not all facts, such as mathematics and logical truths, are observed or detected by senses. Another weakness relates to the conclusions gained through experience, especially in scientific research. This is often briefly explained and subject to subjective bias. Knowledge can be obtained from two sources called empiricism and rationalism. Whether knowledge is empirical or rational, the philosophy of being derived from knowledge is always being debated. "In the philosophy of science, empiricism is a knowledge theory emphasizing aspects of scientific knowledge closely related to experience, especially through intentional experimental arrangements" (empiricism). Empiricism believes that knowledge is acquired through senses and can not understand knowledge without feeling. Theoretical reasons are completely different from empirical reasons. That assumes that the reason is the source of knowledge. In the opinion of philosophers who support rationalism theory, acquisition of knowledge has three types of knowledge. First of all, to have innate knowledge. They strongly say that innate knowledge is completely different from perceived knowledge. This is true, it can not do anything else Experience shapes concepts and gains knowledge. The decoration of empiricism is rationalism, which emphasizes the importance of ideas and knowledge in the sense of independent materials. What we can understand from a shocking point of view is our understanding of secular claims, our role in the formation of specific concepts, and the justification of some concepts. Faith Some form of empiricism seems to be clearly the right, clearly correct scientific philosophy, because people can only be found by observing it; however this seemingly harmless idea is There is always room for discussion. Empiricism is far beyond that in their argument. It remains unknown whether empiricism eventually endorses or advocates claims on scientific knowledge.

For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism Rationalism is often contrasted with empiricism. In fact, these views are not mutually exclusive. For example, the philosophy of science is rational and empirical. But knowledge is basically based on experience if you think that the end of the experience comes from experience through five external senses or through inner feelings like pain and happiness. Similarly, some plausible versions argue that starting from the basic principle like geometric axioms, all possible global knowledge can be deduced derived. The philosophers who discussed this point are Spinoza and Leibniz, and efforts to solve epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes brought about the development of a subjective approach to rationality. Spinoza and Leibnitz believe that, in principle, at least all knowledge including scientific knowledge can be obtained only by rationality.

We live in an era when everyone is looking for reasons to believe something. Posters and advertisements say that "only prayer can save the United States." If prayer can save us, only one question needs to be answered. Who is praying? What are we praying for? God is omnipotent, the creator of all things, without the world there is neither the world nor us. However, many people are wondering if he really exists. There are many philosophical thoughts in this world that God, Platonism, Naturalism, Aristotle, Realism, Empiricism, and Rationalism exist. . The truth about God can respond to observations (the empiricism) about the world through individuals through critique evaluation (rationalism) of the internal logic of different belief systems through human beings. Experience to discover (mysticism), or through combinations of these means? Discussion about finding these different ways of God's truth depends on our beliefs below. Establishment of theology to provide evidence that Christianity is the correct version of theology. Supporters of the majority of this approach argue that they always interpret them according to their own world view, so there is no need to present arguments from historical evidence until people accept theological view of the theology. There is some quote between rationalism and empathism, the use of skepticism in particular, the doubt that other ideas are reality, and the pattern of thinking leading to the truth or real nature of knowledge. However, this skepticism fundamentally opposes rationalism and empiricism. There are three important principles in rationalism: application of specific principles to infer the conclusions, the concepts born of our birth, the idea of ​​nature, that is, to determine the conclusion I am using logic

We live in an era when everyone is looking for reasons to believe something. Posters and advertisements say that "only prayer can save the United States." If prayer can save us, only one question needs to be answered. Who is praying? What are we praying for? God is omnipotent, the creator of all things, without the world there is neither the world nor us. However, many people are wondering if he really exists. There are many philosophical thoughts in this world that God, Platonism, Naturalism, Aristotle, Realism, Empiricism, and Rationalism exist. . The truth about God can respond to observations (the empiricism) about the world through individuals through critique evaluation (rationalism) of the internal logic of different belief systems through human beings. Experience to discover (mysticism), or through combinations of these means? Discussion about finding these different ways of God's truth depends on our beliefs below. Establishment of theology to provide evidence that Christianity is the correct version of theology. Supporters of the majority of this approach argue that they always interpret them according to their own world view, so there is no need to present arguments from historical evidence until people accept theological view of the theology. There is some quote between rationalism and empathism, the use of skepticism in particular, the doubt that other ideas are reality, and the pattern of thinking leading to the truth or real nature of knowledge. However, this skepticism fundamentally opposes rationalism and empiricism. There are three important principles in rationalism: application of specific principles to infer the conclusions, the concepts born of our birth, the idea of ​​nature, that is, to determine the conclusion I am using logic

They may not be aware of this, but complex philosophical principles may influence the simple behavior of daily life in the public. In fact, the long-term and clear discussion on the basic philosophy of human behavior affects not only individuals but also the whole country. Some of the great nations on the planet are formed around the important ideas and perspectives of several great philosophers. However, mainly among these people, John Rock and Thomas Hobbes, they all wrote "natural conditions" or absolute freedom. This article explores the role of natural law philosophy in the empire crisis between the British and American colonies during the first decade of the 1776 Declaration of Independence. Both the British government and the colonial rulers during the crisis were successors. The complex tradition of natural law philosophy dates back centuries ago. In its foundation, this tradition centers on the proposition that there is a standard of justice unrelated to human design as a measure of civil law and political justification. Natural law has shaped deeply the way the US and UK leaders deal with rights, sovereignty, and issues including constitutional government. However, imperialists and colonial opponents often demand a different contradictory tradition of natural law. Michael G. Kammen studied the important role of the American colonial ruler in London in "Ropes of the Rope", colonial rulers, British policy, and the American Revolution. See also: Jack Sosin, Agent and Merchant: British colonial policy and the origin of the American Revolution, 1763-1875. The most important of these agents is included in Ros JS Hoffman, New York Agent Edmund Burke and his editors as well as Pro American Higg Letter. Intimate communication with letters from New York Parliament and Charles O 'Harra, 1761-1776 Evolution of British colonial policy: The relationship between British and North American colonies from 1750 to 1776 was always considered to be unstable. Prior to 1750, the UK basically followed the policies of harmless ignorance and political autonomy of American colonies. (Davidson, p. 97) The contents of most of the colonial era are consistent with a harmless neglect policy and are satisfied with the colonial "greater equality and representative government" (Davidson, p. 95). - Some of the new historic British colonial historians try to research important historical points and find out the cause of the incident. The above description applies to the American Revolution, as countless books are concerned with American colonial decisions to declare independence from the UK. Woody Holden and Bernard Bellin are two historians who investigated this issue and made two independent decisions about the revolution.

In the 18th and 20th centuries, the way of expression of love and romance was different. Discuss the same and different attitudes about arrogance and prejudice of Jane and Austin depicted in love and romance in the 18th century society depicted in pride and prejudice, and "dwarf and man" in the 20th century " Books "Mice and men" created by John Steinbeck in the 18th and 20th century seem to depict very different cultural attitudes toward love and romance. In this article I will explain the similarities and differences between the attitudes in the two books, in particular the attitudes toward sexuality and purpose of marriage. Since then, this paper attempts to understand rationalism by distinguishing between two variants: rationalism of the 18th century and development of the last 20th century. The similarities and differences of each design are noted by the function, if possible. Let's understand how rationalism evolved into architectural ideology. This article also includes discussions on Sub Sports, its pioneers, and their trademarks. Neoclassicism is a universal movement supported by rationalism. It was based on a gorgeous, seemingly excessive baroque and Rococo style reaction. During the neoclassical boom, many works of classical Greek and Roman art and structure remembered with Andrea Palladio, Italian architectural work. This sport is named "Super Classic", and contrary to pure classicism, not all classical designs were used. Neoclassical school chooses a wide range of socially feasible design The rationalistic architecture of the 20th century can be called interchangeably a new rationalism. Design is different from the rationalism of the 18th century, but new rationalists continue to practice important principles of rationalist building. Simple shapes and decorations remain; the functional aspect is called the "theme". Indeed, as many historians have argued, the new rationalism is the evolution of wise architecture in the 18th century. The necessity of rationality of construction engineering is as strong as then. Enlightenment brought about industrial revolution from the 18th century to the 19th century. This impact continued until the 20th century, industrialization became a fashion. Economic progress is no longer related to bricks and trees, and it is related to new elements such as steel, iron and glass.

It is a small place in Jamaica with the theme of Kincaid and Yevgeny Zamyatin. Both texts are a prominent example of this, showing the different types of groups, as the viewpoint shifts from tourist to local people, from rationalism to anti-rationalism. In small places, from two different perspectives, the identity of Antigua is different. Visitors are watching Antigua as a utopia resort that can get rid of boring daily lives. In Jamaica's Kinkade's novel "Small Place", her idea focused on the negative effects of British rule on her country. Kinkade's Antigua country is a small island and British colony. The negative aspects of British rule can be seen in many faces and places of Antigua. One of the most obvious injustices to Antigua 's society is the impression left by the UK. The country of Antigua was under British rule over 20 years. Meanwhile, Britain eroded Antigua by slowly changing Antigua from an exotic island to a British miniature version. This imperialism completely eliminates the sex that Antigua may have. Fostering Antigua's faith and not accepting their culture, the UK enforces their traditions and customs (Kincaid 30). By doing so, Antigua's idea seems to be in the UK. It is a small place in Jamaica with the theme of Kincaid and Yevgeny Zamyatin. Both texts are a prominent example of this, showing the different types of groups, as the viewpoint shifts from tourist to local people, from rationalism to anti-rationalism. In small places, from two different perspectives, the identity of Antigua is different. Visitors are watching Antigua as a utopia resort that can get rid of boring daily lives.

In this course, we will introduce Christian teachings as Christian subjects in great detail about various expressions and backgrounds. Contemporary nursing background (postmodern and new atheism) has also been carefully considered Discussion about various defense methods continues, but the number of people claiming that the era of education has ended is increasing more and more. Those thinkers believe that apology theory assumes ideal of reasonable knowledge. It is the foundation of contrary to modern rationalism Christianity. With the emergence of virtual death of modern rationalism and the emergence of postmoderns, the teachings of antichristian rationalism and Christian rationalism are considered to be outdated. On the other hand, other Christian thinkers believe that the situation in modern times is more complicated. They believe they did not give rationalist ideals because postmodernism qualified it. They concluded that the place is still nursing instruction, but it must take into account the latest developments in post modern thinking. The Christian apology theory tries to build a bridge between disbelievers by proposing that Christianity is true, rational, and suitable for reason and evidence. Christian's apologyist Francis A. Schaefer in the second half of the 20th century saw Christian's apology as "evangelism". It is a way to prepare the heart and soul for the Christian message (the gospel). Oxford University theologian Alistar E. McGrath best summarized the relationship between apology and evangelism. "... Christian apocalypse represents a serious and continuous approach to the" ultimate problem "caused by culture, people, individuals. Is participation aimed to show how Christian faith can give meaningful answers to these questions? As John the Baptist prepared the way of the arrival of Jesus of Nazareth, the teaching of nursing is opening a way to evangelism ... evangelism ... Please send me a personal invitation letter. The apology or defense of Christian religion dates back to the 1st century, but the formal science of apology is a more recent development. In this chapter, we will explore the history of nursing education in three stages. First, we discuss the teaching in detail in the New Testament itself. Secondly, we pay close attention to the main advocates before reform, especially Augustine, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas. Third, we will take a more general overview of apologetic teachings from religious reform to the present In the next chapter, we consider the defense philosophy of some contemporary Christian thought in more detail I will do.

Exploring the frankness and dreams of a red mansion The 17th century Europeans celebrated the end of the Renaissance and celebrated the era of neoclassicalism. During this period, also known as enlightenment and 'reasonable age', society insisted rationalism and encouraged emotional restraint. The writer imitated their work after satirical works of Greece and Rome and homeless novels. About the same time as China, the author of "The dream of a red mansion" was exploring different kinds of understanding rooted in religion. "The dream of a red mansion" is a funny, embarrassing prank on the 10th, which tells Barzac's social view, the arrogance of "fame and vanity", and the irony of fashion. However, in these comparisons, it is a memorial, a symbol of the great tradition of the Chinese novel of China, so much that it is inadequate for a very powerful work. This novel has produced countless adaptations of the stage, screen, and sequel to try to preserve and solve the dilemma of the role and the arc of the story. It is influenced by Zhang Lu 's witty cruel short story "The Red Lanterns" and a luxurious drama of popular TV series like Queen. Exploring the frankness and dreams of a red mansion The 17th century Europeans celebrated the end of the Renaissance and celebrated the era of neoclassicalism. During this period, also known as enlightenment and 'reasonable age', society insisted rationalism and encouraged emotional restraint. The writer imitated their work after satirical works of Greece and Rome and homeless novels. About the same time as China, the author of "The dream of a red mansion" was exploring different kinds of understanding rooted in religion. "The dream of a red mansion" is one of the most beloved novels in China; some literary researchers used their entire career for research. "The dream of a red mansion" is the first outstanding work in Chinese novels with a tragic ending, and it is unprecedented psychological in that account of the interaction among many developing people It reached the depth. In 1989, the novel was directed by Qi Tieli and was produced as a continuous feature film produced by Beijing Film Studio. This project requires preparation for two years and photography for three years. According to the narrative mode of the book, the movie is played for 13 hours in a row and divided into 6 parts divided into 6 parts. Approximately 150 people out of the 900 people in the book will appear in the movie.

A famous doctor in London and Uterson was formerly one of Jikil's best friends. As an expression of rationalism, materialism, and skepticism, Lanyon provides a foil for Jekyll 's mysticism (its attitude and emotion is a totally contrasting role with other personality). His death represents a more general victory of materialism at Dr. Jekyll and Hydite. Excellent lawyers are highly appreciated in the London community. Utterson is conservative, dignified and even imaginative, but he seems to have sneaky curiosity about the dirtier aspects of life. However, his rationalism prevented him from dealing with the supernatural nature of Jekyll-Hyde's relationship. Utterson is not a scientist, but his friend Lanyon (probably the Victorian society) is a denial of his loyalty and supernaturality to a reasonable interpretation. He wants only to separate his potion, purify all its elements and make the dark side a reality - Hyde will appear, but he does not have an opponent like an angel. Once released, Hyde took over slowly until Jekyll no longer existed. People would want to know what will happen to "angels" at the end of the novel if people are half angels and half devils. According to a remark that does not appear in the word of his overwhelming observer, Hyde is covered with fur, shrinking and shrinking, unpleasant ugliness and distortion. His ugly bodies and malformations symbolize his moral ugliness and distorted morality. In fact, for the spectators in the Stevenson era, the relationship between this ugliness and the evil of Hyde may be considered more than symbolic one. Many people believe in topography and believe that people can identify criminals through their appearance. In addition, the small figures of Hyde may represent the fact that like Jekyll 's dark side he has been oppressed for years and can not grow and prosper. His fluff is likely to indicate that he is not the bad aspect of Jekyll, but the incarnation of the animal nucleus Jekyll under the refined appearance of Jekyll. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's hearing impaired Mr. Hyde Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde experienced transformation, transcendence, and illegal era in the strange case of Hide. When Dr. Jekyll was Mr. Hyde, Hyde influenced the lives of several characters in Stevenson's story. In the process of imagining Hyde, the reader was shocked by the amazing performance of Hyde in the physical description. - Schizophrenia and Dr. Jekyll and Hyde's strange case The name of schizophrenia comes from "schizophrenia". "The kidney where the diaphragm is located, the structure that is dominated by the sacral nerve, Greeks believe that the area of ​​the face is the place of thought, or at least the place of emotion (Berle 12) Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident was the first Gothic novel published by Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson in 1886. This work is also known as Dr. Jekyll and Hyde, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange case, or simply Jekyll & Hyde. This is about London 's lawyer, Gabriel John Utterson, who investigated the strange event between his old friend, Dr. Henry Jekyll and evil Edward Hyde. The influence of the novel is ... More

Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, author of Frankenstein, was born on August 30, 1797 and died on February 1, 1851. She was a British novelist, short story writer, playwright, essayist, travel writer and Gothic novel Frankenstein. When she consciously decided to make Frankenstein, she actually gathered her devil in Frankenstein and created her autobiography. Her book shows breast loss of pregnancy. In other words, she has problems with her children and she wants to show this in her book. How much does Frankenstein's excerpt reflect the core problem of romanticism? Romanticism corresponded to the industrial revolution in the second half of the 18th century and was a literary movement that influenced Mary Sherry's "Frankenstein". "Romanticism celebrates life, accepts strong emotions of personal experience, appreciation for the beauty of nature, unlimited power of imagination, all of which are being discussed in Frankenstein." Mary Sherry Romanticism Focusing on romance, the central issue of doctrine, as it is revealed in excerpts incorporating the elements of Gothic novels, Sherry is the center of romanticism through the complex expression of Dr. Frankenstein and Captain Walton Warn the responder that they told the theme that way. Mary Sherry's Frankenstein is a complicated novel written in the era of romanticism. Dark laboratory, moon, monster and other typical thematic themes of romantic novel are included, but Frankenstein is just an ordinary novel. There are many lessons learned in this novel such as how society handles various people. Monsters are a victim of the system. The system is usually used to characterize people through its appearance. Regardless of whether people prefer it or not, society always summarizes the person's characteristics through his or her appearance. Society has set up a non destructible code that individuals must follow to be accepted. People who do not follow the "standard" are disliked by the crowd and are prohibited because of differences. When a monster enters a small town, "...... There are few legs on the door ... The child screams ... ... the woman is dizzy" (101) To fight science, Mary Shelly used romanticism as the subject of Frankenstein. Because she felt that science would take over his idea of ​​my age. Frankenstein 's science introduced Mary Sherry' s writing and romantic beliefs. "Romanticism emphasizes abstract rationality, objective subjectivity, personal and rational irrational emotions and emotions." Romanticism is rationalism and materialism 18th century rationalism and material It can be seen as a rejection of the argument. The scientific feature of Victor Frankenstein is that "(unexplained) Mary Sherry shows that it is a limit to science as it felt that we should oppose science with unexplainable power." One of the romantic projects The department points out the limits of science. And clarify those aspects of experience. Too rational science tends to ignore

Established in 1923, the modern Turkish republic from 1923 to 1938, Atatürk became the first president, and in 1924 the caliphate system was abolished. Turkey and Turkey died 1939 - 45 Turkey joined the United Nations in 1946 and joined the United Nations in 1950 despite alliance with Britain and France. The Korean War: In 1952, which changed from a one-party system to a multi-party system, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) won the ruling of Anatolia Mustafa Kemal (1881 - 1938) is a Turkish thinker, also known as the founder of modern Turkish, Kemal Ataturk. It is a pioneer of secularization of Muslim world. His controversial plan calls for obeying the West and adopting its civilization and culture. Westernization, secularization, nationalism is the basis for him to realize the modernization plan of the Islamic world. But he fails and the spirit of Islam continues to modernize Turkey in its own way. Like other Muslim thinkers, Sir Said Al Ahmad Khan (1817-1898) believes that Muslims should acquire science and technology and adapt to the norms and values ​​of the West I will. The Aligarh movement in India embodies this philosophy. Sayyid Amir Ali (1849-1923) is also a Muslim thinker in India and blames Muslims for the ritual and the history of dedication to life. He believes that the closure of Igittihad leads to rationalism failure, so that the resurgence of rationalism will compensate for this disease Atatec was undoubtedly one of the greatest politicians of the last century. If this talented politician unite the people of the fallen Ottoman Empire, breaking the forces of the European empire and establishing a nation state in Anatolia, today Turkey will certainly not exist today and now. The form will be displayed. He brought Turkish society at an astounding speed, at least elitism, to the modern era, to penetrate Western lifestyles and make Turkey the world's most successful Muslim country.

The purpose of the wax theory is to provide knowledge of a clear and unique "I" which is a sort of mind, but it is important that "the image is made up of thinking, the sensation itself is more obvious than this" It is that. I am "not in imagination" (66). Through wax theory Descartes proves that material things are perceived through our intelligence, not by our senses and imagination. In this discussion, you will see an analysis of Descartes' wax and reasons for doubting his philosophical reasoning. People can see the concept of talent behind the scenes of Descartes' debate, but this sentence is made to remove our deepest understanding of things from feeling rather than protecting talent. It is in the study of the meaning of the discussion of wax that we have reached the essential abstraction of spatial extensions. Of course, it is also going well, but behind the scenes, in meditative theory of meditation we derive this fact from the facts about the existence outside the soul of God. This (native) concept of infinite existence (as in Descartes, God is in our "life") says that we know that there is a world that transcends our thoughts It is that. It is not systematically misunderstood. Part of the problem may be that it is not easy to combine Descartes' identity with heart and consciousness and to combine congenital ideas and principles. In this article, I refer to "Wax theory" proposed by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid discussion, but it is not so rational. In Descartes' claim, he observed a part of the wax from the nest box and analyzed the structure and characteristics of the wax with his judgment and sensation. By doing so, he gives the view that wax can not be explained with visual, tactile, or smell. In this discussion, he is trying to explain the difference between judgment and perception. While showing two differences, he revealed the concept of rationalism. The concept of rationalism is based on the definition of the theory of congenital concepts and some general propositions can prove that it applies before or before empirical verification. . Experians believe that perception and sensation are false and misleading.

Philosophy A variety of moral theories and practices that emphasize the rationality of nature, scientific exploration, and human perception, and often refuse to believe in the importance of God. We deny the transcendent power and moral value, refuse religion, support the belief of improving humanity through our own efforts Emphasizing autonomy of human reason and philosophical standpoint against the authority of the church Various philosophical and theological implications for use with humanitarianists 16c - 18c. Especially those who imitate Latin, "education is suitable for cultivators". People + see the doctrine. As a practical ideology defined by co-founder F.C.S in 1907, the main contemporary meaning referenced to classical interest revived until 1860. Schiller said: "People think that philosophical problems are human efforts to understand the world of human experience through human thought resources." Contemporary humanism, also known as naturalist humanism, scientific humanism, ethical humanism, and democratic humanism, is one of its main supporters, Koris Lamont, "to reject all supernaturalism and to reason and science The great dependence of democracy, defined as democracy Modern humanism has origins of both eternity and religion, which constitutes its subcategory Secular humanism is the enlightenment rationalism of the 18th century and the freedom of the 19th century It is a product of ideological thought, many secular groups such as the Secular Humanities Council and the American Rationalism Union, and many other unrelated academic philosophers and scientists insist on this concept. Humanism can be defined as a reasonable way of life to prioritize interpersonal relationships and concerns over sacred or supernatural ones. It is a belief in the possibility of human reasons and the secular way of the future of mankind, which began with enlightenment in the 18th century. The term "enlightenment humanism" is not as famous as "humanism of the Renaissance". The reason is that the relationship between humanism and humanism and the enlightenment between the Renaissance is not disclosed by historians. However, enlightenment certainly has humanism, and many historians have linked humanism to enlightenment. Enlightenment humanism is characterized by autonomy, reason and progress, but because it is more secular, it is usually distinguished from humanism of the Renaissance. Humanism of the Renaissance is still somewhat religious but it forms an internalized religious belief that influences the reform of Protestantism The Enlightenment and Humanism shows a concept of completely deviating from religion.

After the end of the French Revolution, together with the gradual decline of the empire, each country hopes for independence and hopes to develop a nation state. Perhaps one of the first nationalists, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, urged Germans to become individuals of other national states. After years, more and more people are beginning to be interested in nationalism, some people are more aggressive than others. Ernest Reinan asked about the definition of the real country and the composition of the country. However, not everyone agrees with nationalism. However, with the rise of Napoleon 's French Revolution and the reactions of other countries, the nature of nationalism has undergone a major change. Napoleon's nationalism and republicanism first inspired the movement of other countries. The reason why France broke other countries in the war was thought to be self determination and unity of the people. However, when the French Republic became the Napoleonic Empire, Napoleon was no longer the inspiration of nationalism, the purpose of his struggle. In Prussia, Kant's disciple Johan Gottlieb Fichte insisted on the development of spiritual renewal as a means of participating in the fight against Napoleon. The word Volkstum, or nationality is made in German and is part of the resistance to conquer the emperor. In his 1806 speech, Fichte told the German country the unity of language and country. After 1807 Napoleon conquered the majority of Germany and brought a new idea of ​​the French Revolution, so German nationalism became a powerful force. The large recruitment of the French Revolutionary War and the early formation of the European nation state brought conflicts between people, not conflict between the authorities. Napoleon formed his own line association in 1806 and finished the Holy Roman Empire 1000 years ago, rebuilt the political map of the German state which was still divided. These wars often fought Germans in a national battle between Germany, Germany and Leipzig and showed the beginning of so-called France-Germany genetic hatred. Napoleon included the German speaking world like Rhineland or Hamburg directly in his first French empire and considered the other states of Germany as vassals. The French Kuomintang revolutionism was exported and imposed on most of Europe. One of the key principles of the revolution brought the rise of nationalism as people regarded themselves as citizens and should use the nation state as their source of their highest and only identity . This encourages public hatred and conflict. For example, it is "finishing" in Germany. Napoleon abolished the Holy Roman Empire and reduced the number of 396 principals and Freedom City to 40. As a result, France 's rationalism and culture caused a reaction to add Europe into the next century. Anti - enlightenment movements rejected abstract rationalism, highlighting that romanticism and relationships prosper in Germany and brought about injured German nationalism. Bismarck completed a unification to prevent French people or someone else from stepping over and insulting Germany.

Kinkade, a small place in Jamaica, presents imaginary stories with visitors to the artist's home town Antigua. Kinkade puts the reader in visitor shoes and tells visitors what he / she sees when traveling on the island. Although she depicts the view of Antigua as a picturesque beautiful tourist, she contaminates the image with the details of the problem that most tourists neglect. Roads are bad, the origin of so-called local cuisine, inefficiency of resort piping systems, and medical care. Failure of medical system. The response of local poor people from Jamaica Kinkade's "From a Narrow Place" was very unpopular. Because they are in poverty, they can travel and see the world, so I hate people on vacation, but I can not. This is the same as the American who came to the United States for foreign tourists. We are always "a foolish tourist, why are not they going home?" This view is the same everywhere in the world, and it is part of cultural politics. Tourists are the main source of income for tourists in many countries in the Caribbean countries, and the shape of these islands is not the current form. Because the Caribbean tourism industry is high throughout the year, airlines, travel agencies, hotels are profitable. Local people find jobs at the hotel and employment is on the increase as the hotel continues construction It is a small place in Jamaica with the theme of Kincaid and Yevgeny Zamyatin. Both texts are a prominent example of this, showing the different types of groups, as the viewpoint shifts from tourist to local people, from rationalism to anti-rationalism. In small places, from two different perspectives, the identity of Antigua is different. - The most famous novel by Marginality and Othering, Peyton Place in Metalious' Peyton Place, is a phenomenon of bestsellers and media in the mid 1950s and mid-1960s, impressed with depictions of teenage sexuality, incest and illegal abortion It was. But surprisingly, literary critics carefully looked at the content and style of the novel. At Jamaican Kinkade's novel "Small Place", her ideas focused on the negative effects of British rule on her country. Kinkade's Antigua country is a small island and British colony. The negative aspects of British rule can be seen in many faces and places of Antigua. One of the most obvious injustices to Antigua 's society is the impression left by the UK. The country of Antigua was under British rule over 20 years. Meanwhile, Britain eroded Antigua by slowly changing Antigua from an exotic island to a British miniature version. This imperialism completely eliminates the sex that Antigua may have. Fostering Antigua's faith and not accepting their culture, the UK enforces their traditions and customs (Kincaid 30). By doing so, Antigua's idea seems to be in the UK.

Those who like literature and movies, I appreciate the romanticism of the 19th century. Romantic ideals are now engraved in this society, thinking that most people do not even understand that this is a romantic idea. Almost all movies and books are now feeling romanticism. Romanticism started around 1800 and contradicted rationalism. Rationalism is an attempt to solve the problem at that time with rational thought and reason. Romanticism is basically contrary to these ideas. You may be familiar with American Gothic writer Edgar Allan Poe. Maybe you may have even read his short story like his poem "Crow" or "The Heart of Storytelling". Well, Edgar Allan Poe is part of the American Romantic movement and has written many stories and poems. Today, we are studying "Annabel Lee", one of his famous poems. "Annabel Lee" is the last poem written by Edgar Allan Poe before the death of 1849. He sold his right while he was alive, but it was not made public until his death. Poo often writes about the death of a woman, including many young wives who died two years ago, as many women died in their lives. "Annabel Lee" is no exception. This poem was written after the wife of Pau's wife, so it is believed that it might have been written for her. "Edgar Allan Poe" Edgar Allan Poe was born on January 19, 1809 in Boston, Massachusetts. He was born in two poor actors, David Pau and Elizabeth Arnold Pau. David Poe was born in a good family of Baltimore. He was called a drunken drink, and shortly after Edgar was born, he left his mother and the other two Edgar brothers and sisters. Elizabeth is considered attractive and talented, but she died soon. She died of tuberculosis at the age of 24. Edgar was three years old. "-" The soul of the dead, the life standing in front of your eyes, and the deaths around you and their will will cast a shadow over you. Still "(" The soul of the dead ") As" the father of terror "Pauai likes to write down his feelings in a more uneasy and unforgettable way. He wrote many wonderful poems about death, ghosts, and some love stories, but it was distorted. Po is very enthusiastic about writing, and most of his life can not be shared with the world.

At that time he was 86 years old. His body is in a graveyard named St. Mary Paddington Green Churchyard in London, England. (World biographical encyclopedia) Steven Spence has a caring personality. He believes in peace, democracy and freedom of complete speech. He also wrote an article about social injustice. Steven got his poem collection at the age of twenty. He published a series of verses in 1954. Spender served as an editor of Horizon and Encounter magazine. "Apology of poetry" is a remarkable article contesting Puritan and the fundamentalist Steven Gerson's attack on poetry. This complicated article by Sir Philip Sydney represents a definitive objection to the poem. His strong emotional sentence defended the irrational comment from Gerson's poem. - Rationalism and empiricism are two philosophical schools in the 17th and 18th centuries, expressing opposite views, including knowledge, on specific topics. The discussion between rationalism and empiricism schools has nothing to do with psychological research at the time, but it has greatly contributed to the possibility of promoting the establishment of psychology. James Fitz James Stephen was born in London on March 3, 1829. His father, Sir James Steven, served as a professor of modern history at Cambridge, later Lord Acton served. Stephen's father drafted the law to abolish the slave trade of the British Empire and his grandfather James Stephen tried to abolish slavery. Steven's education took him to Etonton, King's College (London) and Trinity College (Cambridge), where he was a student of Sir Henry Sumner. After further research at the entrace he was transferred to the bar in 1854. In 1869 Steven took over the legal career and went to India, he served as a legal council member of the Governor Council for two and a half years (succeeding Maine), eventually becoming the judge of the Queen's judge. In 1989, he visited India and participated in the "Waggs World Poetry Festival" held in Bharat Bhawan for centuries by Jawaharlal Nehru. Other veterans such as John Ashberry, Stephen Spender, Tomas Tranströmer, Miroslav Holub also joined him. At the world poetry festival held in Bharat Bhavan in 1989, 26 participants from 21 countries gathered. The poetic space over 10 years is occupied by the four poets W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender, Cecil Day-Lewis, Louis MacNeice. These poets, at least in the early days, were at least actively in leftist politics. They admire Elliott, but they also represent technological innovations far from the predecessor of modernism. Other non-permanent poets work the same way. One of them is Michael Roberts, whose "New Country" anthology introduces this group to a wider audience and names them.

Romanticism is the participation of emotions, fantasies, intuition to the story. It is the opposite of rationalism including logic, reason, and the rationalism of the story. There are exactly five romantic elements to choose from. It includes dissatisfaction with city life, desire to connect with nature, interest in individualism, nostalgia for the past, and supernatural interests. There are some forms of romanticism in some form among the six stories that we can choose from among them. In the world of Lip Van Winkle and Romantic literature, writers can express their opinions with many kinds of sentences. Their theme can be explained by life experience, biography, poetry or other forms of literature. One form used by the author is romanticism. There are many qualities that determine various views of romanticism. - Analysis of Irving's Rip Van Winkle Rip Van Winkle grabs guns and dog wolves and goes into the forest. He was absent under the tree and came late at night. When Lip was ready to go home, he heard a voice called his name. He went to see who called his name. He found an old man holding a bucket. Lip and the old man went to the valley above the mountain. So, they found a group of strange people. Supernatural interest with past nostalgic. There are some forms of romanticism in some form among the six stories that we can choose from among them. I chose to express my desire to connect with nature in "Rip Van Winkle", "Thanatopsis", and Walden. Rip Van Winkle wants to take him away from a troublesome wife to the forest. And we will clarify the luxurious forest landscape that we wish to connect with nature. In the first paragraph of the story, Washington Irving's Rip Van Winkle expressed a natural connection. Hua Biao Owen's short story "Rip Van Winkle" seems to be a simple story about unhappy married men. His happiness has left. And dog worship; but only eavesdropping from his poor wife. However, if you read more carefully, the story has quite different meaning. Through his constant mention of her disordered relationship with Dame Van Winkle and Rip, Irving

A wonderful religion and philosophy Greek philosophy In the 6th century BC Greek philosophy began dualism. The development of the Greek philosophy is a compromise between Greek monaural theory and the influence of the East, in other words, it is a combination of rationalism and mysticism. In this way the philosophy of the former Socrates began. The interests of former Socratic philosophers are concentrated in the world around the human race - the universe. This is the era of great interference inside and outside the Greek society, like after the Peloponnesus War. Greek religion is the beginning of Greek philosophy and the beginning of many great philosophers. The lack of stimulation in Greek religion is the main reason philosophical research is very popular in Greek culture. Learning religious philosophy is because people like Socrates do not understand why things are and why they should. The lack of religion is the reason that people and philosophers question the moral choices people follow. - A wonderful religion and philosophy Greek philosophy In the 6th century BC Greek philosophy began dualism. The development of the Greek philosophy is a compromise between Greek monaural theory and the influence of the East, in other words, it is a combination of rationalism and mysticism. In this way the philosophy of the former Socrates began. The interests of the former Socratic philosophers are concentrated in the world around humanity - the universe Socrates (469 470 / 470-399 BC) was a Greek philosopher, considered to be the father of Western philosophy. Plato is his most famous student, he teaches Aristotle, and then he leads Alexander the Great. Through this progress, Greek philosophy originally developed by Socrates spread throughout the world known during the conquest of Alexandre. Socrates was born. 469/470 BC, sculptor Sophronicus and wife Phaenarete. When I was young, I learned music, gymnastics, grammar (a common field of youths in Greece) and followed my career as a father's sculptor. Tradition is considered an outstanding artist and it is said that his grace statue on the way to the Acropolis was admired in the 2nd century. Socrates worked well in the military and saved General Alcibias's life at the battle of Potidaea. Socrates was a great Greek philosopher (Athens) around 469 BC - 399 BC. He is one of the most important men and is known as one of the founder of European philosophy. Socrates never written philosophical text. All works about Socrates and all his works about Socrates such as his life and philosophy come mainly from Plato, his student's work. - Aristotle's rhetoric describes the three main objectives of rhetoric, namely the outline of politics, law and etiquette. Persuasion is the main view on the three main places of rhetoric. Rhetoric can be defined as "the ability to observe the persuasive power available in any particular situation" (Aristotle 22). Rhetoric can also be seen as an introduction to explain the persuasion method used in modern advertisements and advertisements.

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

Strategic precautionary measures - the nature of the mechanism in game theory. It is related to encouraging participants to act according to their true preferences. Authenticity - Quality characterizing "truth", an assertive claim or claiming to intuitively know Truth - a philosophical concept to distinguish between relative and obvious truth and falsehood of assertion and hypothesis In the huge literature on truth, there are many ideas on how to define the truth. Molyneux's most troubling attempt to adopt the theory of truth correspondence normally attributable to Aristotle, the truth of the proposition is determined by the relationship between the proposition and a specific part of reality. He proposed the following concept of this relationship: This is confirmed by the premise, so the condition we need to see the statement truly is that it is empirically verifiable. However, this concept of truth is self-destructive. After all, the description that "All truths can be verified by experience" can not be verified by experience, but you may think that is true. The truth is unique to an individual. As a phenomenologist, for me, I feel hungry more than 2 + 3 = 5. You can not "verify objectively" the truth with experience or other methods. Our standard of defining the truth is always relative and subjective. Whether it is moral, scientific or artistic, what we believe is true is transferred along with the general intellectual wind, and hence social, cultural and technological in a particular era It will be determined by normative norms. Non - Euclidean geometry at least partially damages the tautological nature of the so - called geometry - it is often thought of as a basis for arguing that rationalist can provide knowledge as a reason. This means that the authenticity of geometry is closely related to your personal point of view. Because the mathematical paradigm is "real" than its viable alternative. Rationalism is not a unified position. Some rationalists only assert that some truths about reality can be discovered through pure reason and thought (including mathematics, geometry, and sometimes moral truths), but other truths I need experience. Other rationalists will further argue that all truths about reality must be obtained through rationality in some way, usually our sense organs can not merely experience reality directly . On the other hand, empiricism is more uniform in a sense, denying that any form of rationalism is realistic or possible. While experientists may not agree on how to acquire knowledge through experience and in what way we allow you to get external reality, knowledge about reality may be based on experience and reality It is necessary to interact with.

UK school: The UK media school also acknowledges that the international approach to international relations is "through the media" between rationalism and realism (Buzan, 2001, p. 471). The idea is that they should not form separate elements, but form an overall picture of international relations. The unique approach of British schools to international relations is its methodological diversity, its historicism, and three very important concepts: international system, interrelationship between international society and world society. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical research on the basic insights and origins of international relations. Functionalism is a theory of international relationships, derived mainly from the experience of integration in Europe. Functionalists are not self-interests to consider as a factor to motivate realists, but rather are interested in the common interests of the state. Integration and development of proprietary internal dynamics: As more states are integrated in limited functional areas or technical areas, further integration dynamics in related fields are increasingly being discovered. This integration of "invisible hand" is called "overflow" English English at schools in Europe is currently the most widely studied foreign language in the European Union (EU). Figure 35 shows the ratio of students studying English to other languages. In the near future, we rarely challenge this dominant position. The most commonly spoken foreign language in primary school is English, as part of a broader reform, the first foreign language education is currently taking place in the early stages of child education. In Spain and Italy, 8 year old students are gradually implementing mandatory foreign language education, and Greek and France experimentally gradually implemented this education at the age of 9 (Dickson and Cumming, 1996) . EFL, English as a foreign language means teaching English in areas that do not speak English. Learning is for students who are more privileged in English-speaking countries visiting as tourists, as part of a regular school curriculum, or in other ways, or in particular before or after college graduation, students It is held in the home country of. TEFL is a teaching of English as a foreign language; please be aware that this guidance can be done in any country, whether in English or not. In many cases, to master EFL, we will work for internationally focused organizations or companies while conducting the exam as an integral part of personal education or for career development. In countries where there is no special status in English, the EFL may become part of the state school curriculum (a language theorist Braj Kachru calls this "extended circle country"); it supplements with a private paid course You can also.

The academic philosophy that has been going on for about 1250 years ago is a combination of faith and reason, designed to understand the contradiction of the Bible and the teachings of the Church. The goal is to strengthen the teaching of the Church by examining the opposition of the Church to the discussion and the critical analysis (at least strictly, creating a positive result for the Church is the only goal) . Because religious research should be based on faith rather than reason, we can not successfully integrate research. Academic philosophy school taught by a scholar (or school) of medieval university around 1100 - 1500. Academic philosophy is trying to harmonize the philosophy of ancient classical philosophers with medieval Christian theology. The main purpose of academic philosophy is finding answers to questions, or resolving conflicts. It is best known for its application in medieval theology, but it is used in classical philosophy and other research areas. It is not a philosophy or theology itself, but a learning tool and method that emphasizes dialectical reasoning. Science believes that science takes precedence over other knowledge acquisition methods. This term is often used in derogatory ways and refers to scientific progress that some degree of trust or speaker considers excessive. Scottishism is a philosophical school and theological system named after John Dunscott. It severely criticized the old Franciscan school and Thomasism The philosophy of academics comes from the study of dialecticism at school. The most decisive academic philosophical war was initiated by mysticism in the 12th century against the dialectical condemnation. In the era of its best development, the outstanding feature of academic philosophy is that it uses dialectic. It is therefore surprising to find an academic philosophy that is condemned by excessive obedience to authority and neglect of reason. Rationalism is a word with different meanings. It is sometimes used to deny the authority of revelation and to designate a system to validate all truths on reasonable basis. In this sense, academic philosophers are not rationalists. Rationalism of academism is in the belief that reason is a doctrine used to clarify spiritual truth and protect faith. It is against mysticism, it does not trust reason and emphasizes intuition and contemplation

Rene Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye Touraine, France. Descartes is considered "Jack in all industries" and contributes greatly to the fields of anatomy, cognitive science, optics, mathematics and philosophy. He is known as the father of contemporary rationalism, wealthy people, scholars, pilgrims, travelers, and faithful followers of Roman Catholic faith. He received education at Ange Jesuit University, La Fleche. Several months after college opening in January 1604, he entered college at the age of eight. My paper is about Rene de Carte's second meditation. In the second meditation, René Descartes' famous motto is "Cogito, Ergo Sum" or "I think I like this", as I also do. Finding his second meditation is the most controversial and interesting thing in his meditation. The second meditation is the most controversial meditation in Descartes meditation. Because his first question method is explicitly introduced. And this is also his idea of ​​becoming extreme, because all sorts of knowledge must be criticized and people have to doubt everything, including himself. Rene de Carte (1596 - 1650) Rene de Carte is a French philosopher and mathematician. Descartes made a great contribution to the philosophy of rationalism. Descartes' meditation is epoch-making. Because he doubts the previous belief and is trying to prove their validity through logic. Later empiricists opposed Descartes' method, but his philosophy broke many topics for further discussion. Descartes has been proved to be "the existence of God", but his doubt was an important step in promoting the reasons over faith. Descartes also made an important discovery in geometry, calculus and mathematics analysis.

Kinkade, a small place in Jamaica, presents imaginary stories with visitors to the artist's home town Antigua. Kinkade puts the reader in visitor shoes and tells visitors what he / she sees when traveling on the island. Although she depicts the view of Antigua as a picturesque beautiful tourist, she contaminates the image with the details of the problem that most tourists neglect. Roads are bad, the origin of so-called local cuisine, inefficiency of resort piping systems, and medical care. Failure of medical system. The response of local poor people from Jamaica Kinkade's "From a Narrow Place" was very unpopular. Because they are in poverty, they can travel and see the world, so I hate people on vacation, but I can not. This is the same as the American who came to the United States for foreign tourists. We are always "a foolish tourist, why are not they going home?" This view is the same everywhere in the world, and it is part of cultural politics. Tourists are the main source of income for tourists in many countries in the Caribbean countries, and the shape of these islands is not the current form. Because the Caribbean tourism industry is high throughout the year, airlines, travel agencies, hotels are profitable. Local people find jobs at the hotel and employment is on the increase as the hotel continues construction It is a small place in Jamaica with the theme of Kincaid and Yevgeny Zamyatin. Both texts are a prominent example of this, showing the different types of groups, as the viewpoint shifts from tourist to local people, from rationalism to anti-rationalism. In small places, from two different perspectives, the identity of Antigua is different. - The most famous novel by Marginality and Othering, Peyton Place in Metalious' Peyton Place, is a phenomenon of bestsellers and media in the mid 1950s and mid-1960s, impressed with depictions of teenage sexuality, incest and illegal abortion It was. But surprisingly, literary critics carefully looked at the content and style of the novel. At Jamaican Kinkade's novel "Small Place", her ideas focused on the negative effects of British rule on her country. Kinkade's Antigua country is a small island and British colony. The negative aspects of British rule can be seen in many faces and places of Antigua. One of the most obvious injustices to Antigua 's society is the impression left by the UK. The country of Antigua was under British rule over 20 years. Meanwhile, Britain eroded Antigua by slowly changing Antigua from an exotic island to a British miniature version. This imperialism completely eliminates the sex that Antigua may have. Fostering Antigua's faith and not accepting their culture, the UK enforces their traditions and customs (Kincaid 30). By doing so, Antigua's idea seems to be in the UK.

Nelson's Cartesian Perceptualism and Judgmentism Summary: One of the tensions in Descartes' human error description is that, despite the fact that God is our omnipotent omnipotent creator, we are accused of will It comes from our view that it is. . In this article, I will explain Descartes' second pressure against human error. After explaining the tension, I reviewed Alan Nelson's explanation of the Descartes approach to disarmament it. The explanation of Nielsen is nearly correct, but I think that it hides some interesting details of Descartes' recognition and judgment theory. In order to solve the problem, the meditator began to investigate the cause of the error. Descartes suggested his judgmentism during the discussion. Determine cooperation from intelligence and will. As a result of the investigation, the cause of the error was judged to be inappropriate use of our free will. Errors will arise if the intent agrees with a proposition with clear and unclear understanding of intelligence. Because we have the right to avoid mistakes, these mistakes are our responsibility. Descartes' minimum standard is aimed at the level of certainty that arises when the perception of the mind is clear and clear. (For Descartes, clarity is in contrast to ambiguity, clarity is in stark contrast to confusion.) He is clear and unique (at least for those who have not read the meditation yet) We acknowledge the abolition of decision based on recognition. Said). However, he often uses terms (eg, "awareness" and its synonyms) to describe determinable decisions with this level of certainty. It translates well into English "knowledge" (and its synonyms). In this article, I refer to "Wax theory" proposed by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid discussion, but it is not so rational. In Descartes' claim, he observed a part of the wax from the nest box and analyzed the structure and characteristics of the wax with his judgment and sensation. By doing so he gives the view that wax can not be explained with visual, tactile, or smell, but by heart action to ensure that things are genuine and considered physical objects I can explain. In this discussion, he is trying to explain the difference between judgment and perception. While showing two differences, he revealed the concept of rationalism. The concept of rationalism is based on the definition of the theory of congenital concepts and some general propositions can prove that it applies before or before empirical verification. . Experians believe that perception and sensation are false and misleading.

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

Robert Frost is probably one of the most famous and influential American poets ever. When using the image of nature to explain his idea, he is often recognized as questioning the meaning and purpose of life. In Frost's poem 'Restoring the Wall', separation is the subject of discussion. And commentators need to be separated when not harvested. To understand the position Frost has taken, it is important to understand the definition of the wall; therefore, its purpose is to play a role in creating and maintaining isolated ideas from one another. Analysis of the repaired wall Robert Frost once said that "wall repair" is a poem destroyed by the application. What does "application" mean? All misunderstood poems are destroyed, but this is the danger of all verses. I think that Frost is opposed to reducing or distorting poetry through actual use. When President John F. Kennedy visited Berlin Wall, he cited the first sentence of the poem: "Some do not love the walls" - On 13 August 1961, the German Democratic Republic ( GDR) built the Berlin Wall to prevent it. That citizen left the country (Frederick Taylor, US News Network). For 28 years, the Berlin Wall was completely separated from West Berlin and its population was separated from other human beings. Margaret Atwood represents the real experience of the novel "Maid's story" Robert Frost 's "Repair Wall" 56 lyrics cast a sarcastic tone expressing impatience with neighbors and "walls". The focus of this poem lies in the issue of separation, the necessity of the borders, and the use of fantastic arguments to destroy them. Frost uses the phrase "repair wall" to show that the relationship between the narrator and the neighbor is not fixed. The focus of this poem is to meet two people, walk and repair on the wall. - Fish is a monologue of a story made up of 76 free lines of poetry. This poem was made as a long section. The author is a speaker who speaks the poem. She explained about the experience of fishing. The author rowed the charter boat in the water, which was probably a lake. She tried to explain the fish to its full potential. It seems to be the purpose of poetry, not to mention seeds and the approximate age. The story gives the impression that the fish is slightly old Metaphorical words, nature, and holidays are all part of Robert Frost's poem "Foshan". Frost uses countless metaphor and metaphor to compare various things of the whole poem. The mountainous region of this poem is compared with the wall, and a sense of protection in this poem is obtained. Almost all frost poetry includes nature. The nature of this poem is used in connection with mountains and lakes. Another theme of this poem is a vacation. - Romanticism is a sort of emotional, fantasy and intuitive participation in the story. It is the opposite of rationalism including logic, reason, and the rationalism of the story. There are exactly five romantic elements to choose from. It includes dissatisfaction with urban life, connection with nature, interest in individualism, nostalgia for the past, and supernatural concern.

What? Summary of "hidden intellectuals" by Gerard Graff: In his article "hidden intellectuals" Gerald Graf advocated criticism of the educational system to ignore people with non-traditional knowledge doing. Intellectual possibilities of street smart people. As a society, we believe that essential academic subjects can give us "real" knowledge, and even knowledge of fashion, sports and dating is not intellectual. Graf argues that this hypothetical problem is that the educational value of these themes is completely ignored. Graf himself experienced his own fair struggle in education as an anti-intelligent person claiming to be a teenager. He thought it easier for him to learn and debate his classmates and his favorite baseball team than his work or reading he received at school. In the article "hidden intellectuals", Gerald Graf thinks that in addition to traditional academic rationalityism, there may be some sort of implicit rationalityism. Graf said that this form of rationalism is hidden in the usual discussion about fashion, movement, and other aspects. Schools may lack forms of intelligence that can not be seen in academia. Graf supports his view that by using his own experiences to review it and shape his thoughts, intellectuals can also be present outside academia. Gerald Graff's "hidden intellectualism" is an article in which a former professor in the UK discussed the misunderstanding of intellectuals in society. He focuses primarily on how teenagers think intellectualism is a negative feature that only "otaku" fights. He also described in detail the experience of revealing his hidden intellectuals in college literature classes after "anti-intellectuals" grew in the 1950s. However, through the method developed by Graf and 11th grade high school teachers, they want students to make controversial controversy just like intellectuals, and I want them to discuss. They do this to allow students to see their true potential as intellectuals. Throughout this article, Graf continues to research the challenges of quoting the work of several authors on this subject and identifying and accepting his own rationalism.

In the second wave of time, secular views are a little general. Legalism focuses on the rules and laws enforced by the punishment system, and there is no religious belief. Both Confucianism and Greek rationalism attempt to explain the modern world without using God as evidence According to my survey, the first advice for elderly people to share with 20 years old oneself is to understand your purpose before making a big decision. The big picture is dedicated to finding instructors and providing questions, exercises and advice to promote honest, intentional conversation. If this does not work, there is no reason why you can not achieve your goals beyond paid work: participation in communities, citizenship, family relations, and religious groups. All of these will promote meaningful activities centered on society and others. The question of the big picture that students have to ask is about the change or continuity of every topic over time. "Has the political or economic change had the greatest influence on the social structure of Europe from 1750 to 1900? In East Asia, from this period to the end, what happened to the social status of slaves and serfs? "Caribbean? Or Russia? "Within the 5 days of the AP World History course, this overall picture problem will allow students to better prepare for the continuity and temporal change of the labor system.

It is recognized by Aristotle's three outstanding performances. They are excellent in the body, excellent in character, superior in wisdom. Two of them (personality and intelligence) belong to the category of human selection and rationalism. Physical excellence is extremely important for Eudemonia, but this has not been mentioned (Urmson, 1988). There are also some influences of this kind of excellence, usually determining our living behavior. Controlled intrinsic behavior is divided into two forms of morality and intellectuals. Morality includes courage, devout, justice, equality. Another form is the influence of intellectuals including my own spirit, wisdom, and intuition. On the contrary, human behavior is often uncontrollable. They include our appearance, high level friends (social relationship), and wealth (Urmson, 1988). Aristotle tells us that we have good people in the world. Excellent thought and superior personality - these people show excellence. His personality is excellent - êthikaiaretai - We usually translate it into moral virtue or moral excellence. When we talk about moral virtue or superior personality, the focus is on making individuals morally worthy of high quality combinations of respectable people. Aristotle defined benign letters at the beginning of Volume 2 of Nichomac's Ethics. I will decide it. This time, it is the average between two malignant people.

What is rationality: Reason of virtue means to recognize and accept reason as the only source of knowledge, the only worthwhile judgment, and the only action guidelines. ... This means that all people's beliefs, values, goals, desires and behaviors must be based on the commitment of the thinking process, selection and validation principles. What is experience: empirical knowledge is knowledge about facts that people may encounter in their experience. These are always special and can be of many kinds, including the need for extensive training or some equipment to experience them. In addition, much of the empirical knowledge is actually conveyed through teaching from the authorities, but it may be fairly reliable and true. Experience is often a bit vague. Therefore, since one may have been in the UK, I think I have knowledge of British experience, but even if it is so empirical, what the word "British" represents is personal It is a little too much for experience. And people. The way to decide if someone has some empirical knowledge is to test it in some way by using logic, or by referring to other knowledge that you think is possible. Method experiments can be as easy as finding words in a dictionary, or it can be as complicated as using a cyclotron or PET scanner. Why knowledge is rational and empirical: Kant's theory fills the gap between empiricism and rationalism and reveals that they can be understood as equilibrium, so historically and philosophically very important . Components In other words, our knowledge comes from empirical encounters and rational manipulation, and we can prove that pure experience and purely rational way can not achieve knowledge achievement. Instead, he believes that human understanding of its own nature allows experience and can be used for reasoning. Kant's theory not only provides a theoretical explanation of how modern results such as pure mathematics and natural sciences are possible but also the interaction between experience itself and understanding is based on its origin and boundary Push the philosophy forward in the direction that is important to find. It's a place. Human knowledge Finally, we believe that knowledge is reasonable and empirical. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who decided to combine these two ideas. Descartes believes that certain knowledge is "a priori" and irrelevant to experience. The other side of the idea is "ex posteriori" empirical knowledge. Transcendental knowledge is always correct, and ex post knowledge is comprehensive. Kant believes in the third type called synthetic a priori. This type is necessary and there are empirical elements The concept of prior knowledge is based on intuitive or rational insight. Laurence BonJour said in his article "The structure of empirical knowledge" that "reasonable insight" to "see" direct, non-speculative understanding, understanding, or proposal must be true I said. Thanks to your explanation, at least I can try my work. I can try my own work. Guidelines absolutely helpful when I start a trip to my doctoral program Knowledge can be received by two sources called empiricism and rationalism. Whether knowledge is empirical or rational, knowledge - derived philosophy is constantly being debated. "In the philosophy of science, empiricism is a knowledge theory emphasizing aspects of scientific knowledge closely related to experience, especially through intentional experimental arrangements" (empiricism). Empiricism is that knowledge can be gained through sensation and knowledge can not be understood without feeling. The rationale is quite different from empirical evidence. It assumes that reason is the source of knowledge. In the opinion of philosophers who support rationalism theory, acquisition of knowledge has three types of knowledge. The first one is to have innate knowledge. They strongly say that innate knowledge is completely different from perceived knowledge. This is true, it can not do anything else

Along with the beginning of the American colonial era of 1776, the tension with King George III of England may reach the highest ever. Americans are dissatisfied with the behavior of overseas rulers. Because of their taxation and trade restrictions, British and mercenary soldiers occupied their city. Lexington, Concorde and Bunker Hill also have fights. Along with the development of the United States, England has become more nervous about its control, and several voices are beginning to rise about independence. The biggest and most convincing thing is Thomas Paine living in Britain-born Philadelphia. His booklet "common sense" expresses American independence in an unprecedented way. Abstract: This article will do three things. First, I analyzed the general common sense structure of criticism and decided the normative power behind various critiques. Secondly, this analysis shows that raising questions in the theory of some behavioral reasons, calling it a moral anti-rationalism, that moral reasons are not necessarily the reasons for all actors to take action To argue. In particular, this dilemma focuses on moral anti - rationalism that captures moral criticism and its common normative concepts of potential normative power. Finally, although the strong interpretation of my moral criticism is consistent with the moral anti-rationalism promises, denying moral criticism is quite different from other types of criticism. I regard this problem as a good reason for considering alternative analysis. In the first part, Kant from commonsense morality to the highest moral principle, he called an absolute command. Kant not only analyzes commonsense concepts such as "goodness", "duty", "moral value" but also the obvious premise of our common agreement ethics is the best moral principle, absolute order I believe it will produce. Kant's argument in the first part can be roughly divided into four parts. (1) Goodwill (2) Objective Discussion. (3) Three propositions on responsibility and (4) Absolute order

Can you post this article? AY 2011-2012 I think that my government will not do the right thing; I hope they will protect me. National Security Research Institute WILLIAM KURTZ DANIEL P CORBIN, NH-4, Naval Seminar Division 13 KELLY MORRIS, Junior Teacher Advisors National College of Industrial University College, Fort McNair, Washington DC 20319-5062 This article is based on the author's opinion, It does not reflect the National Defense University. Official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States An empirical study of this book covers core issues in the field of national security research: Part 1 Demilitarization, intervention, deterrence and weapons of mass destruction, military doctrine and strategic culture, and military - private relations , Part 2 arms control and alliances. This section briefly summarizes empirical theses methods, assumptions, and findings. It avoids artificial distinctions between international politics and domestic politics, and then briefly discusses sovereignty and regionalism in world politics. The second major reason for the theoretical development of social science, international relations, and certain areas of national security research is that the knowledge agenda of security research should be narrow and broad. The mainstream theoretical problem does not include a discussion between conservativeism, liberalism, Marxism as an academic version of the 1970s and the early 1980s, no longer realism, pluralism, structure - global analysis viewpoint . Instead, the central theoretical argument now introduces rationalityism and constitutive interpretation into theory. National security research is exposed to various perspectives of sociology or constitutionism and economic or rationalism. The book tries to trace the middle of Max Weber and he tries to stay in the original "method way". In the late 1970s and the late nineteenth century, this fight challenged Gustav Schumler and German historical economics to Carl Menger and British neoclassical tradition. Neoclassical theory emphasizes selection, individual units, rationalism, market logic, prediction and interpretation. The historical school emphasizes constraints, collective, irrational, social logic, explanation, interpretation. In social science as a whole, modern theoretical discussion in the field of security research tells the central aspect of the old debate in modern form. In 2015, National Geospatial Information Agency and Georgetown University collaborated on the first Kalaris Intelligence Conference, focusing on national security research and problems. This event was named after former Special Assistant to George Cullas, Secretary General of the Central Intelligence Agency. "The true spirit of Georgetown loves intergroup interaction, dialogue, and discussion, which is a meeting between departments useful to all of us," says Groves. "We will change our way of life to those who learn from people who are not in our particular bubble, change everyday and keep on changing more flexible than ever before." On the Intelligent Conference NGA at Georgetown University, the constantly changing dynamics between intelligence and technology is central to discussion

Here, we will see God's warranty and better understand where we got the knowledge we gained. According to rationalism knowledge can be expressed through our senses or through our automated logical knowledge. Through God's word, through a proven solution, or through our senses, whether we give God to us and personal experience about his purpose for us. Rationalism and empiricism express what we got and where it comes from. Pannenberg says, "God's knowledge is the starting point of religion because the reality of God is the premise of man's worship by God, but human understanding of God can be true knowledge God himself You can know when you know (1928, page 189) He likes Jesus' interpretation of the two disciples who are on the way to Emmaus (Luke 24: 13-35) Under this understanding, Pannenberg emphasized that "God is the only theological subject because all of theology is related to God" (1928, page 13). Since these italics have become cross-cutting themes in Pannenberg's theological expression, he says, "People can include all this in the concept of creation, because that is God's creative work I can only do it " "God is dead, we killed him." See Luke 24: 13-35 for a critical discussion and theological understanding of Pannenberg's revelation, history, eschatology, the future and hope. about. Reformed theology believes that God can be known, but humans can not know everything that he is infinite. To understand God like this is the same as understanding him. This is totally impossible: "We can not do infinite." Furthermore, it is impossible to give the definition of God in a correct meaning. Since it is not possible to classify God as a higher genus, logical definition is impossible. At the same time, people believe that they can acquire the knowledge of God, which is sufficient for people to achieve the purpose of sacred life. But true God's knowledge can only be obtained from God's self-revelation, and can only be obtained by those who accept this with a childlike belief. Religion must be based on this knowledge. If this is the case, religion is the knowledge of God in advance in man.

Romanticism as a reaction to enlightenment is called a period of reason or spiritual enlightenment, a secular intellectual movement that looks like a secular interpretation. Enlightenment began in 1687 and announced the "principle" of Sir Isaac Newton, who ended in the French Revolution (Fiero 134) in 1789. The era of romanticism is a response to rationalism of enlightenment. The romantic exercise began in 1760 and ended in 1871. Romanticism as a sport is a reaction to cultural movements, aesthetic style, and awareness as an attitude (210). Romanticism This is a reaction to enlightenment, that is to say that they believe that life is designed for human happiness. However, enlightenment placed reasons at the center of human achievement. Romanticism does not trust human wisdom, but puts value on the quality of feelings and intuition. Nature and spontaneity are considered good. The highest truth will come from a personal moment. It emphasizes the limitless possibilities of individuals. Utopia's overall sense is optimistic and belief. Romanticism as a reaction to enlightenment is called a period of reason or spiritual enlightenment, a secular intellectual movement that looks like a secular interpretation. Enlightenment began in 1687 and announced the "principle" of Sir Isaac Newton, who ended in the French Revolution (Fiero 134) in 1789. The era of romanticism is a response to rationalism of enlightenment. The romantic exercise began in 1760 and ended in 1871. Romanticism as a sport is a reaction to cultural movements, aesthetic style, and awareness as an attitude (210). Romanticism is an aesthetic movement with contemporary origin, mainly in Germany in the 18th century. Inspired by the work of J. W. Goethe and Friedrich Schelling, the romantic movement is a reaction to empiricism, Age of Enlightenment that focuses on reason and reason. German artistic and philosophical emotions in the late 18th century are rapidly accepted by artists all over the world, especially in the UK, symbolic figures such as William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge rapidly become romantic I changed it to everything. One of the most important and famous sports of people. British literature

Empiricalism is the theory that perception evolves from sensory experience and inherent psychological interactions (such as emotions and self-reflection). Empiricalists get facts based on close observation and experiments. It is ultimately the use of an inductive thinking process. For experientists, facts take precedence over theory. Most experientists are fair and objective de facto observers. One of the main beliefs about empiricism is that no one can gain world understanding unless they desire experience and reason. Empiricism "" Empiricism "refers to research methods that rely on empirical evidence, including experiences. Empiricism is based on facts, evidence and research. Scholars and researchers deal with empiricism. If you believe in Easter bunny, tooth fairy, Santa Claus, it is not in the category of empiricism. Supporting these myths is not a fact. Empiricism is the way to go. " Relationship between feminist empiricism and empiricism Empiricism considers experience to be the sole or main reason for knowledge. From classical experiences to several theorists in the early twentieth century, I believe that the content of experience can be described in fixed basic theoretical neutral words, such as words of sensory data. Most people also believe that philosophy can provide excuses or external reasons for experiences or scientific methods. Quinn completely changed empiricism by dismissing these two views. For Quinn, observation is full of theory. It is based on complex concepts not given soon by experience, and these concepts may be modified based on further experience (Quine 1963). Epistemology is far from providing scientific scientific evidence, but it is another project in science that we investigate the practices of our own exploration (Quine 1969). Many people think that science is based on empiricism. Science is empirical as it combines a systematic approach to observing the world, but it is not based on empiricism. Empiricalism limits science to the use of empirical methods. In empirical approach, it is not possible to create general rules from a series of observations using induction logic. Take a series of observations as an example and claim that "all swans are white." No single observation of Black Swan denied this claim, no matter how many positive observations were made. The core of science is based on rationalism. Rationalism shows that some propositions can only be known by intuition. Rationalism makes it possible to assume a structure we can not directly observe. As a rule of thumb, Darwin can describe new species, but can not assume evolution

Using Inertial Balance Theory to Find Quality Physics can be called studying various properties of matter and energy. The substance can best be explained by observing the mass of the object. Quality is the amount of material in the object. The quality can be found using spring balance, balance scale or inertia balance. Inertia is the mass's resistance to changes in its motion state. Scientific law states that mass and inertia are directly proportional. The purpose of the inertial balance is to measure different inertia between different masses, thus providing a mathematical and highly accurate mass measurement method. Inertial mass is a measure of resistance to acceleration when an object applies force. It is determined by applying force to the object and measuring the acceleration caused by that force. When receiving the same force, objects with small inertial mass will accelerate more than objects with large inertial mass. Some people say that higher quality bodies have greater inertia. Active gravitational mass is a measure of the gravity flux intensity of an object (gravity flux is equal to the surface area of ​​the gravitational field around the surface). The gravitational field can be measured by dropping a small "test object" freely and measuring its free fall acceleration. For example, objects freely falling near the moon are affected by a smaller gravitational field. Therefore, the acceleration will be slower than if the same object falls freely near the Earth. The main mystery in classical Newtonian physics is the unexplained ratio between so-called inertial mass and gravitational mass. Physical objects attract each other with a force proportional to their "mass" product. Physical objects are also accelerated by forces proportional to their "mass". These two appearance very different attributes, physicists distinguish between two quality concepts: the physical object's gravity mass and the physical object's inertial mass. Newton himself pointed out that the two "masses" are obviously proportional to each other, but they did not explain it (see Book I, defs. I-III, Book III, Item 6. In the 19th century Hungary The physicist LórándVosEötvös 31 constitutes a device for measuring how close the gravitational mass is to the inertial mass and his twisting balance (about 1890) is one hundred million (ie 10 - 8) .10 - 12 ) (534) However, the attributes of rationalism are quite different. The only thing in the whole universe may be an illustration of "property" Einstein believes that the mass of inertia is not only highly correlated with the mass of gravity but also indeed the same, and we believe the so-called gravity field itself is the inertial field. (See chapters XIX and XX in particular.) The field is not an observable entity. They are often referred to as "theoretical" or "what if" entities. Several philosophers and physicists have always dealt with them this way, but this is not to say that they are unreal or fictitious. To say that an entity is "theoretical" means that it can not be observed "directly", its existence is assumed and confirmed by its descriptive role in scientific theory. The gravitational field is used to describe the mutual attraction of a physical object (see 144-8) (as the electric field is used to explain the attraction and repulsion of the charge). The inertial field is used to account for the acceleration of the stressed object However, the attributes of rationalism are quite different. The only thing in the whole universe may be an illustration of "property"

Artists are picturesque so they like hilly areas; engineers are flat so convenient; a happy person likes what he calls "good women" - she fits him; stylish young Gentlemen admire fashionable youth Ms. - She is his kindness; young, hard work, frustrating tutor, most beautiful blind person, mainly not sensitive to the glory of certain psychological qualities , Application, knowledge love, natural ability, obedient, true, appreciated, attracting his charm and winning his respect In the huge literature on truth, there are many ideas on how to define the truth. Molyneux's most troubling attempt to adopt the theory of truth correspondence normally attributable to Aristotle, the truth of the proposition is determined by the relationship between the proposition and a specific part of reality. He proposed the following concept of this relationship: This is confirmed by the premise, so the condition we need to see the statement truly is that it is empirically verifiable. However, this concept of truth is self-destructive. After all, the description that "All truths can be verified by experience" can not be verified by experience, but you may think that is true. The truth is unique to an individual. As a phenomenologist, for me, I feel hungry more than 2 + 3 = 5. You can not "verify objectively" the truth with experience or other methods. Our standard of defining the truth is always relative and subjective. Whether it is moral, scientific or artistic, what we believe is true is transferred along with the general intellectual wind, and hence social, cultural and technological in a particular era It will be determined by normative norms. Non - Euclidean geometry at least partially damages the tautological nature of the so - called geometry - it is often thought of as a basis for arguing that rationalist can provide knowledge as a reason. This means that the authenticity of geometry is closely related to your personal point of view. Because the mathematical paradigm is "real" than its viable alternative. Rationalism is not a unified position. Some rationalists only assert that some truths about reality can be discovered through pure reason and thought (including mathematics, geometry, and sometimes moral truths), but other truths I need experience. Other rationalists will further argue that all truths about reality must be obtained through rationality in some way, usually our sense organs can not merely experience reality directly . On the other hand, empiricism is more uniform in a sense, denying that any form of rationalism is realistic or possible. While experientists may not agree on how to acquire knowledge through experience and in what way we allow you to get external reality, knowledge about reality may be based on experience and reality It is necessary to interact with.

The works of Modernism of FindeSiècleFindesiècle of my time are now being used to refer to the last forty years on behalf of the 19th century, but at that time the word was modern, with social decline I have real sociological implications of reaction. Especially in France, despite the fact that the whole of Europe is true, but society is changing, this trend is worth having such a pessimistic view of development, development. More people, coupled with the decline in the crime rate, continued to improve the discerning elite talent acquisition, obviously these elites are all the factors of this social phenomenon, every society in every field You have the ability to enter. Modern The historian Jeba Stanhel traced the roots of fascism ideology in the 1880s, in particular, the end of the theme of the century. This theme is based on materialism and rationalism, positivism, rebellion against bourgeois society and democracy. Supporting emotional, irrationalism, doctrine of subjectivity and vitality. At the end of the century the Finnish civilization in the crisis requires a large-scale comprehensive solution. The finnish / century-old knowledge of individual schools of thinking is only a small part of a larger group and it should not be considered an individual atomization digital sam. They accused the free society of the tyranny of individualism and rationalism society in bourgeois society The works of Modernism of FindeSiècleFindesiècle of my time are now being used to refer to the last forty years on behalf of the 19th century, but at that time the word was modern, with social decline I have real sociological implications of reaction. Especially in France, despite the fact that the whole of Europe is true, but society is changing, this trend is worth having such a pessimistic view of development, development. More people, coupled with the decline in the crime rate, continued to improve the discerning elite talent acquisition, obviously these elites are all the factors of this social phenomenon, every society in every field You have the ability to enter. Modern Claude Hagègedistuetroispériodesderayonnementdufrançais: lapériodeduMoyenÂgequséétenddela fin duXIéaudédudu XIVesiècle, lapériodesquies'éndedédéduldrègnedeLouisXIVàlafinduXVIIIesiècle, etlapériodeallantde Raffin Du XIXeaudéduduXXesiècle2. Lalangue française acettepecialitéquesondéveloppementaétéenpartieL'œuvredegroupesintellectuels, commelaPléiade, OU D 'institution, commel' Académiefrançaise. C'EST UNE Lang DITE «académique». Toutefois, L 'use avant-garde SES droits et al nombreux sont ceuxquimalaxèrentcettelangue vivante, au premier rangdesquels Molière: upper Parule D'ailleurs de la «languede Molière»

The ability to achieve philosophical thinking through philosophical thinking is the ability to truly understand and understand everything that affects the environment and the surrounding environment and knowledge is the ultimate understanding and appreciation of the environment. Through this last understanding, philosophers can comprehend life and life more than ordinary people. Unfortunately, becoming a philosopher and even knowing philosophers may be difficult. For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Traditionally, there are two ways of epistemology. Rationalism, that is to obtain knowledge through reasoning, to obtain knowledge through empiricism, that is, sensory experience. There are several extremist philosophers, but most people think that both knowledge methods are necessary, to some extent they support and amend each other. I will explain in detail later. Rationalists pay attention to what they call the necessary truth. This means that something is true and must always be universal. Another term that means the same is a priori truth. Transcend is Latin 'preexisting' and you know that it must be a real transcendental truth before you begin to observe the world that senses reveal to us. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.