truthfulness

Artists are picturesque so they like hilly areas; engineers are flat so convenient; a happy person likes what he calls "good women" - she fits him; stylish young Gentlemen admire fashionable youth Ms. - She is his kindness; young, hard work, frustrating tutor, most beautiful blind person, mainly not sensitive to the glory of certain psychological qualities , Application, knowledge love, natural ability, obedient, true, appreciated, attracting his charm and winning his respect

In the huge literature on truth, there are many ideas on how to define the truth. Molyneux's most troubling attempt to adopt the theory of truth correspondence normally attributable to Aristotle, the truth of the proposition is determined by the relationship between the proposition and a specific part of reality. He proposed the following concept of this relationship: This is confirmed by the premise, so the condition we need to see the statement truly is that it is empirically verifiable. However, this concept of truth is self-destructive. After all, the description that "All truths can be verified by experience" can not be verified by experience, but you may think that is true.

The truth is unique to an individual. As a phenomenologist, for me, I feel hungry more than 2 + 3 = 5. You can not "verify objectively" the truth with experience or other methods. Our standard of defining the truth is always relative and subjective. Whether it is moral, scientific or artistic, what we believe is true is transferred along with the general intellectual wind, and hence social, cultural and technological in a particular era It will be determined by normative norms. Non - Euclidean geometry at least partially damages the tautological nature of the so - called geometry - it is often thought of as a basis for arguing that rationalist can provide knowledge as a reason. This means that the authenticity of geometry is closely related to your personal point of view. Because the mathematical paradigm is "real" than its viable alternative.

Rationalism is not a unified position. Some rationalists only assert that some truths about reality can be discovered through pure reason and thought (including mathematics, geometry, and sometimes moral truths), but other truths I need experience. Other rationalists will further argue that all truths about reality must be obtained through rationality in some way, usually our sense organs can not merely experience reality directly . On the other hand, empiricism is more uniform in a sense, denying that any form of rationalism is realistic or possible. While experientists may not agree on how to acquire knowledge through experience and in what way we allow you to get external reality, knowledge about reality may be based on experience and reality It is necessary to interact with.