The faedo of Phaedo Platon of Faedo is a dialogue between Faedo, Sevesus and Shimaase and it depicts Socrates' explanation as to why the true philosopher should not be afraid of death. Because if you truly respond to philosophy in the right way to explore the ultimate truth, they are prepared for death acts. Through Socrates, Plato has built his evidence for the immortality of the soul which is the origin of our intelligence. There are several steps you must take to prove that the soul is immortal. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. Plato's Phaedo (1930) is headquartered in an isolated community named Philus, where people gather in jail to discuss the last moment of Socrates' life. Plato's four arguments in the faedo will help the reader understand his body and soul separation. Phaedo considers the "opposite" theory. Socrates said in Faedo and consider whether the necessary law stipulates that all opposites are to be produced against and against other sources. Resurrection - We mean not only that we are dead, but also that we are reviving again and again. Then, this leads us to the "recollection" theory. Remember that learning essentially remembers what we know before we are born, but then forget it. For Plato, this leads to the concept that logically helps knowledge understand equality.

Phaedo, Plato of Plato of "The Phaedo" explains his theory of the shape and concept of the soul's death. We know that the soul and the body are separated, the soul lives after death, and we have lived until now. This allows us to understand the concept of morphology and how we get it before birth. It is only death that the soul is away from the body. Because the soul can only obtain formal knowledge from the body, you can understand that the sole time after death is the soul that gains this information. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

The open discovery of Phaedo Plato 's Faedo in Plato discovered that Socrates protects his philosophical life. Given the status of Greek philosophy at the end of the 5th century BC, this defense seems unnecessary and difficult. It is because ancient Greece provided us the origin of philosophy, but the special period of this history can prove the disgust and persecution of the general public. Several philosophers, including Pythagoras, Anakusagoras, Protagoras, were laughed at their creeds and attacked. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

The theme behind Plato's faedo "Faedo" is the desire to prepare Socrates and to die for his belief in immortality. Socrates believes that his soul will always leave the form there when his body no longer exists. Socrates is convinced that he is not only afraid of his death, but also welcomes it. He believes that it can truly understand and gain all knowledge only when the soul is away from the body. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Socrates first established the existence of the triad based on the ancient idea, that is, the soul of birth came from it; basically, they resurrected from death. That assertion prove that Socrates is born of death, if a living is resurrected from death, a soul must exist in that field (Phaedo 70 d). Then he extended this reason to all plants, animals and the future. Socrates uses this argument to explain this logic: "If things get smaller, it comes from something bigger and will be smaller" (Phaedo 69e). Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. If people know something (in this life) without being taught, they must learn before they are born. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

Recalling Plato's Phaedo and Meno as the earliest philosopher of our writing, Plato is misunderstood that it is often simply replicating Socrates' rhetoric. In Meno, one of the earliest platonic daughters, Platon provided his own philosophical theory and injected his leadership talent. When discussing the process of teaching virtue, Meno advocates a difficult paradox. "How do you search for things you do not understand" (Plato, Meno, 80d). The theory of recall is explained in more detail in Plato 's Meno, and the discussion of Phaedo implicitly assumed this initial argument implicitly. However, Faedo and Meno are consistent, and the presentation of the theory in each dialogue can exist independently. Plato's theory of remembrance is a reasonable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. The general theme is the theory of recall of Plato. Plato's recall theory is a viable solution to the men's knowledge paradox. In many of his conversations Plato often concludes that we can not know something through the senses. He often concludes that we are familiar with our knowledge in former existence. In Meno, Socrates said, "Because the soul is immortal, born frequently, and I have seen everything here and in the basement, I have not learned anything, so I can remember what was previously known. Things are not surprising ... "In the eyes of many people in Plato According to reminiscence theory, we suggest that there are some inexperienced knowledge at birth (isomorphism etc.), so that the soul exists before birth and inherits knowledge. In this case, Socrates means reminiscence (though he had understood everything before), he is not so bold at Phaedo, but another explanation of theory is in Mero of Plato. Discussion or ultimate discussion of life forms explains forms, intangible assets, and static entities that are responsible for everything in the world, and all things participate in forms. For example, beautiful things participate in the form of beauty, and the fourth participates in the form of even numbers. The soul is essentially involved in the form of life. In other words, the soul never dies. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

Therefore, if a cease-fight does not occur, the fire will not cool down and will not cool without stopping the snow. (103c-105b) "Whatever the soul has, it can be brought to life at all times, it is the truth." (105c-d) So we agree with what it says, so the soul I will never accept the opposite of what it brings. (105d-e) "It is necessary to say differently from the dead, if the dead can not be destroyed, even if death falls the soul will not perish" (105e - 106d) In the played faedo, Plato insists on "immortal soul" and proves his argument by providing an argument that supports it. The drama Phaedo was written by Plato took place in the town of Phlius in Peloponnese. Ekecrates, one of the last moments Socrates attended, met the faedo, and he urged Faedo to tell the whole story to him. Plato himself seemed sick and did not appear in prison on Socrates 's death day, but he was discussed, probably the story of Faedo was the same as Ekecrates' s dialogue. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

When people regarded the death of Socrates as martyrdom, he did not destroy what he said. Indeed, he explained everything he said earlier by drinking poison. Socrates is a martyr, because martyrs are defined as people who sacrifice their lives for others. Socrates showed martyrdom as he died for his friend. Socrates died for his friend to show them that they should not be afraid of death. He explained to his friend that the soul is immortal throughout the Faedo and he uses logical arguments to prove that this is the truth. Faedo happened in the morning of Socrates' death, mainly dealing with the immortality of the soul. Faedo began to communicate the story of Pythagoras to Ekecrates, and he asked Faedo to tell him about his understanding of the death of Socrates. Faedo is willing to talk about how Socrates decided to take hemlock poison. Socrates was imprisoned for not believing in the gods of Athens and was accused of defiling young people in Athens. Socrates was sentenced to death by the political leader of Athens. When Socrates was dead, Ilhas Phaedo appeared. Socrates explored various theories of the immortality of the soul, and life after death attempted to prove that the soul survives after death. The conversation was also transmitted by Cebes and Simgias. They all came to help Socrates escape from prison The text begins with an argument between Echland and Phaedo, reveals that Phaedo has appeared in the last sentence of Socrates, and Echecrates wants to listen to Socrates' story at the last moment of Phaedo. When they finally talked to Socrates, Phaedo was with Simmias and Cebes. Faedo explained his feelings in Socrates as a strange combination of happiness and pain. Socrates must wait for a long while between trial and actual enforcement. While waiting for him he continued his philosophical thought and conveyed in his spirit to encourage him to create music (61b). Socrates seems to believe that suicide is not popular in the community, the gods now seek him death. (I think that the quality of Howard WiFi is very boring to read this story, I swear I am particularly awkward, but I am bored.

Socrates is a classic Greek philosopher and feature of the book of Faedo, philosophers are most enthusiastic about acquiring knowledge and are not afraid of death and separation of body and soul, but are welcomed We are defining it as a person. Even in his last days, Socrates was pursuing knowledge, and he proposed a theory to strengthen the immortal debate of his soul. His attempt to discuss his view is not necessarily considered convincing evidence to support the existence of immortal soul. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal.

Sheriff Henry Peters and county public prosecutor George Henderson visited the house of Lights to investigate the murder of John Wright. His wife, Minnie Wright, was arrested for murder and the two came to collect her evidence. For this purpose, they brought Minnewrite's neighbor, Lewis Hale. And he was the one who first saw John 's corpse outside Minnie. Hale will be a witness to indictment of the case. The three men were wives of Sheriff 's wife Peter' s wife, and Mrs. Lyle 's Mrs. Hale, brought his belongings from Minnie and brought him to his prison. The sheriff was the first small farmer to enter the light river. While the woman kneels the door, he and the other two men gathered around a hot stove to look for warmth. Obviously, the two women are more concerned about homicide than their husbands, and they are making an appointment about entering the house. In men, they began to investigate. Henderson asked Hale about the previous day. When he stopped by a light farm, he talked about going out to the town with a potato bag and wondered whether the light wanted to share a telephone line. He found Minnie behaving oddly at her rocking chair. She told him that John was dying on the second floor with a rope around his neck. At that time, Minnie claimed that John was strangled to an unknown attacker during her sleep, she said she was "not sleeping very well" and heard no murder. Minnie is arrested and is waiting for a trial to kill her husband. She is in prison all day and needs to change her clothes, that is why Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale are out. Mr. Henderson suggested that men looked around and thought they might be able to find clues. According to Sheriff Peters, the men decided not to look for Lewis Hale to find Minnie's room. these In the summary by Susan Glaspell of the screenplay of "Trifles" in Susan Glaspell's play "Trifles" there are five characters, three men and two women. They lived in the house where Mr. White was killed last night. These people tried to find evidence to nominate murderers or motives and nominated Lady Wright as a murderer. When the man was downstairs, the woman saw himself around the kitchen and the living room. They noticed the canned fruits and facts of Mrs. Wright ... the assumptions and underestimation of the importance of the information may lead to wrong decisions and conviction. The stereotype that men are superior to women and the result of this ideology are the themes that Susan Grasspel appeared in the drama "Triful". This show features five members of the community, investigating the crime scene and trying to reveal evidence that may answer questions about the person who killed John Wright. The only obvious suspect in the play is Minnie, the wife of Light. Susan Glaspell 's play "Trifles" was written in 1916 and reflects the authors' attention to the cultural constraints of gender and gender roles. As the title of Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles" (click here to view the episode summary), women's attention is often considered trivial, little or no in social real work Indicates that it is not important. It is not important, of course, this is done by men. Graspel asked questions and this also included questions from readers and viewers, the relative value of male and female views and works, the establishment of a tense drama, two different stories, male and female We raised questions through development. . However, as Holstein told her article, Grasper's question is not necessarily about the role of women in society, but how to evaluate or evaluate knowledge and opinion in a particular context.

Othello: Summary * Othello is a tight, tightly integrated game that is emotionally rising. The ancient personality of Ottaro of Iago is the cause of all the tragedies in the process of the drama. He is a manipulator, not directly against Othello, but through other characters he deceives. As you can see from his actions during the game, Iago has the talent to use other people to promote his own plan. * In the first performance, scene 1 is the most important. It tells the whole drama. Prepare a historical essay on university life essay education. Cloned articles of research papers and review papers criticize dissertations on abstract and analysis. Purchase paper on friendship phenomenology papers of education online cheap sven birkerts paper. Legislation of weed articles Yesterday why you should not be a doctoral thesis How to quote a university article Multiplayer research paper Video Personal gospel research paper type paper Papers marriage thesis for homosexuals The contents of the US paper , I created a research paper on peri-cira perna in the wireless communication year of immortal jellyfish research papers. My brother's articles are used in educational articles of Marathi's best idioms. Application of literary essay on the history of educational papers Amerikanische ip adress besspiel essay paskaa unessay mini paper othello machiavelli prince summary paper your blind marker walk walk spiritual journey essay hard to decide all national ballot puropellon koulu answer questions about rhetoric paper art editing and drama PDF editing Papers on Postmodern and Religious Essays Writing Power Point Papers for University Application Application Papers for Youth Life pdf akrobatik sayyessayword mp3 keats odes Papers on Global Warming cwv 101 World View Physics uressaya Boy Scouts jpri Review Articles Character Analysis Paper Large Saint Jordan's Safety and Health Work Papers and a 300-word Paper Length Lincoln Purse Holding Illustration Articles at the Reflection Essay English End

The model of Democritus shows that the substance consists of invisible particles called atoms and voids (spaces). He said that the atom is immortal and can not be changed. They are also homogeneous, which means they have no internal structure. His atomic model is solid and shows that all atoms differ in size, shape, mass, position and arrangement, and there is a gap between them. Democritus was a Greek living between 460 BC and 370 BC, his idea was based on reasoning rather than science, and borrowed two Greek philosophers. Teaching: Leucippus and Anaxagoras Democritus knows that if you cut stone in half, each piece has the same properties as the original stone. He guesses that as you continue mincing the stones finer and finer, at some point you will get a small piece of debris so that it can no longer divide. Democritus calls these infinitely small substance atoms "inseparable". He believes that atomos are eternal and can not be destroyed. Democritus believes that the materials that atoms give to them are specific. In other words, unlike other material atoms like fur, the stone atoms are unique to the stone. This is an amazing theory that attempts to explain the entire physical world with a few ideas. In the end, however, the two most famous philosophers of ancient Greece, Aristotle and Plato, rejected the theory of democracy. Aristotle accepted the theory of Empedocles (Epedo Docleus believes that all substances are made up of four elements: fire, air, water, and the earth. Nature). Aristotle has joined a unique (false) idea that the four core elements can transform each other Because of the great influence of Aristotle, the theory of Democritus has to wait nearly 2000 for it to be rediscovered. The purpose of Greek philosophers is to explain the natural world. At the end of the phenomenon they observed, there was a "big problem". This big problem has been fixed in various ways by creating all other content. Democritus extended this theory and stated that the material is no longer "splittable" and consists of small particles called "atoms". All of these atoms are composed of the same main substances and the only difference between them is their size, shape, mass, position and arrangement. The difference in these characteristics explains the difference in the nature of things around us. The early thought of atomic theory and structure: Democritus to Dalton, author: Dr. Anthony Carpi adapted Write a review rather than a summary: Ensure that the summary of the topic does not exceed one-third of the paper. The main part of the paper should be evaluation rather than summary. The summary can be evaluated separately, or summarized as part of the assessment. The article sentences should accurately describe your idea. You may wish to predict your body by including the main reasons for evaluation in the texts of the paper. (For example, movie XXX is very suitable for taking a break to university students due to comedy comedy, intense action, and a wonderful visual effect.) Writing abstracts is not limited to English courses. You can take many other courses and you may need to write a summary. The summary is a report of the author's view. Summary Rewrite what you read in your own language. The summary can be thought of as a short version of the original writing. You should tell the reader what the main focus and focus. Your abstract should include the main discussion of paper or paper. In summary, you should not write to include your comments or what you think the author is trying to imply. You should focus only on what the author wrote. Please do not include evaluation by readers in abstract. You should not write a strong or weak argument that you think is the author. In the second paragraph, I will write an accurate summary of the main idea of ​​the work. Do not confuse this summary with your own evaluation. Instead, use the abstract to describe the most important idea the author is trying to convey

The executive summary is the first part of the business plan and is generally considered the most important part. Usually 2-4 pages, the executive summary is usually written at the end after completion of the whole plan. Then the executive summary covers the essentials of all the other parts. The Executive Abstract is designed to stimulate readers' interest in business plans for financing from banks, venture capitalists, or angel investors. The aim is to provide enough information so that the reader can find out all the details of the plan itself and read it. This is not an introduction. You do not want to write an executive summary as the lead of the whole program. I need a more highlight reel The executive summary is a suitable place to clarify the goals and objectives of more business plans as internal guidelines. Business plans are not formatted, but there are some guidelines to make things easier. However, the executive summary needs to deal with specific topics such as: Business description - In the previous section, clearly explain the role of the business and the types of products and services it provides. Who is the target market? What's wrong with the company's products? History - Once you get basic information on the company, let's study history a bit. When, when and who will share their backgrounds and roles, location of business, details of business, the business will be started. Achievement - As this section is designed to focus on highlights, be sure to show that revenue growth rate, customer growth rate and any relevant milestones related to the company's ongoing success Product or service description - One or two paragraphs of the executive summary should detail the company's products and services, how to respond to demand, competitive advantage, and why demand increases. Financial Overview - This section is important if the program is used for funding. It should have top line prediction, how much it costs, and how to use it. Future plans - Where is the project going What kind of expansion plan is there? How will it look after 3-5 years? These are described in the last paragraph or two of the executive summary. At the end of the executive summary, readers need to fully understand the type of business being described, the level of current success, and the amount the company needs to promote growth and expansion. The Executive Summary Executive Summary is a summary of the long search report or the point of publication. Research reports are often highly technical, but the purpose of the executive summary is to communicate in an easy way so that all readers can understand the information regardless of their knowledge and expertise. Managers use the executive summary to understand the background of broader research policies and make decisions on changes in policy, plan or investment decisions. Usually, the length of the executive summary is 3-6 pages. Longer summaries are often used when charts and other illustrations are included. The executive summary should be organized according to the category of project summary, background, process, survey results and conclusions, and action recommendations. The following is a description of the type of information you need to consider for each category. C: \ Documents and Settings \ Greg Waidley \ Local Settings \ Temporary Internet Files \ OLK 21 A \ Tips on Creating Executives Sumaries.doc 6/18/99 Executive Summary The Executive Summary provides a review of the entire document outlining the conclusions and recommendations made. Together with the title, the executive summary should provide a clear overview of the document. Therefore, it must be clear and short (100 to 200 words). The proposed executive summary consists of three elements. Survey question. A clear and obvious question that indicates the scope of the investigation and requires an answer. A well-designed question is likely to bring a higher score on the report. Research

King Duncan general Macbeth and Banco met three strange women in the desolated Scotland wasteland on their way home, so they calmed down the rebellion. Women predicted that Macbeth was awarded the title of Cawdor Tana, then became King of Scotland, and Banquo's successor would be king. The generals want to hear more, but the strange sisters disappear. Duncan created Cawdor 's Macbeth Thane and thanked the success in the recent battle, he proposed a short visit to Macbeth' s castle. Write a review rather than a summary: Ensure that the summary of the topic does not exceed one-third of the paper. The main part of the paper should be evaluation rather than summary. The summary can be evaluated individually or summarized as part of the assessment. The article sentences should accurately describe your idea. You may wish to predict your body by including the main reasons for the evaluation in the article sentences. (For example, the movie XXX is very suitable for taking a break to university students due to comedy comedy, intense action, and wonderful visual effects. Writing abstracts is not limited to English courses. You can take many other courses, and you may need to write a summary. The abstract is a report of the author's view. Summary Rewrite what you read in your own language. The summary can be thought of as a shortened version of the original sentence. You should tell the reader what the main focus and focus. Your abstract should contain the main discussion of paper or paper. In summary, you should not include your comment or what you think the author is trying to imply. You should focus only on what the author wrote. Do not include ratings by readers in the abstract. You should not write a strong or weak argument that you think is the author. In the second paragraph, I will write an accurate summary of the main idea of ​​the work. Do not confuse this summary with your own evaluation. Instead, use the abstract to describe the most important idea the author is trying to convey throughout the work, and other literary details that may lead or stimulate the reader. Please criticize the author's speech in this section. Please write a series of questions when writing a review. Does the author provide accurate and appropriate data in a reasonable way? Does the author clearly define important terms? Does the author provide reasonable explanation? Please pay attention to this paragraph whether the author has achieved the purpose of creating this article.

Galileo Galilei is an Italian scientist who developed the basic law of a fallen body and has verified this by careful measurement. He made a telescope to study the lunar crater and found four satellites that orbiting Jupiter and supporting the cause of Copernicus. Summary of the main points: Before Galileo's research results came out, the church believed in the geocentric model introduced by Claudius Ptolemy. However, Nicolaus Copernicus suggested that the discovery of Jupiter's moon and Venus's stage by Galileo supports the sun-centered model. It takes a long time for Galileo's contribution to be recognized, but you can better understand how the solar system functions. Other findings based on contributions of astronomers: The use of the Galileo telescope to observe the heavens also observes the dark spots of the sun called the sunspot, which he considers as "the ring of Saturn in the ear" It made it possible. The surface is covered with crater (Moché, 2009) There is evidence during the last two centuries that Galileo discovered Neptune before officially discovering satellites and modern telescopes (Redd, 2013). Galileo Galilei Galileo was born in Vincenzo Galileo of Via del Cuore in Pisa in 1564. He is a man known for his musicology and Giuli Ammananti. Galileo moved to Florence at the age of ten and young Galileo at the age of 11 was sent to Vallon Brouza to attend school. At the age of fifteen, Galileo decided to become a priest, but his father gave up his ambition. Late summer of 1581, Galileo entered the University of Pisa and started a medical course. I am studying the system of Aristotle ... In 1609, Galileo remodeled the three-piece spy glass, but Galileo did not invent the first telescope, but his high-quality remodeling is well-known It was very popular. His change helps clarify the idea that the earth and the planet will circle the sun instead of the opposite. This powerful telescope also helped astronomers to see the huge universe at that time and was waiting for countless stars to be discovered ("the first telescope")

Meno may be one of Plato 's earliest conversations, and the conversation can be reached around 402 BC. A conversation began when Meno asked Socrates to teach virtues. That question (and more fundamental question is what virtue is) is the two people who occupy the whole text. Meno introduces important and recurring Platonic themes, including forms of the Socratic Dialogue itself. Socrates tried to analyze moral terms in detail by questioning those who claim to know the meaning of that term, and finally he also concluded that "expert" did not even know the meaning of the term Did. Other important themes formed in the early days include memories (the soul is eternal, all know, learning only "memories") and virtues as a concept of wisdom. Socrates also advocated many points on the nature of the definition. Socrates and Meno define the range of potential virtues. Each virtue was proposed by Meno and destroyed by Socrates. One of the things to be asked is whether it is possible to find something that is not yet known (such as when seeking a definition of virtue), and Socrates and Meno slaves have problems with scaled models through recall theory I solve it. At the end of the conversation participants (including Anytus who played a secondary role at last) have reached the classic Socratic state - they do not yet know what virtue is yet, but at least they now know I know that there is nothing. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficiently long time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one meaning "the speaker is heading to the store") The summary is understood to be smaller than the original sentence, and the same words may be used . Most commonly, when we provide a summary, we are taking the "point" of the work. We have to decide what is important and what can happen. This is the version of the TV "Clean House" program. What will we protect and throw what? Then we will organize what we keep as it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the article). They usually point out the point. Please read the last few paragraphs (20% from the last 10% of the article). They usually summarize the points

Author Jaime O'Neill's article "There is no story in the classroom" emphasizes the problem of communication between teacher and student due to lack of student's basic knowledge. The authors support this claim by combining personal experience, evidence from recent polls, opinions from other professors, and the experimental results he performed in his own classroom. O'Neill's experiment was to do a "general knowledge" test of the unexamined 86 questions for the students on the first day of the course. In this test, "Most students frequently answered incorrect answers rather than correct answers." In the wrong answer, there are errors such as "Gravity of invention of Darwin" and "Leningrad in Jamaica". If you make the problem more complicated, the students will not ask questions. This means that their teachers think they know that they do not know. O'Neill shows that this seems to be a typical problem throughout the United States, according to the teacher, and shows the scope of this problem. O'Neill believes that common sense in society is extremely important for communication. Without these common knowledge, learning becomes more difficult as teachers and students do not use a common knowledge system. The authors show the deterioration of common sense through poll results, personal experience, other teacher's opinions, and his own experimental results. When time runs out, the group will share the summary with the class. As an example, the summary is "application of laws that do not provide equal protection for everything does not apply to countries that cause repression and weakening." Discussion on summaries is important. Students listen to each other and explain their reasoning. The teacher checks, understands and removes misunderstandings. The final summary is negotiated and recorded in the course. Students record abstracts in handouts This week I annotated it using the summary example and created a summary title for the class. As a class, we read the four different summaries of the same non-fiction article and put them together in 1 to 4. Four of them are the most powerful summaries, which contain clear main ideas and support the main idea details. Important details, and selection of specific words. When I moved the summary on the graph (I used a removable tape to move the summary) I annotated them using a post summary and put down the characteristics of each summary. This will help students to understand the characteristics of each level summary and to think about where their own summary is in our continuum. Students and their writing partners read and reflect their abstracts, use continuums, and annotate their abstracts Executive summary is very important as a communication tool between academia and business. For example, members of the Faculty of Agriculture at Texas A & M University says: "The executive summary is the first interaction between the creator of the report and its target audience: decision makers, prospects, and / or colleagues, the executive summary has an impression" to provide a complex summary often Some say that an executive summary can lead decision makers and others to ignore important issues, Professor Amanda Sinclair of the University of Melbourne, this is not usually a passive process In a globalization-centered study, she said that policy makers "pressure on using simple interpretations of complex problems" and "generalizing non-political and differences in differences" "We faced the problem.

Sheriff Henry Peters and county public prosecutor George Henderson came to John Wright's farmhouse with witnesses Lewis Hale, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale, the police were investigating the murder of Lite. Louis Hair explains how he has found the strange behavior of Mrs. Wright, as she told her that her husband was killed during sleep. There was a gun in the house, but the light was killed by the rope. Men continue accusing women from minor things rather than incidents, but as long as Henderson agrees that these incidents are not related to the incident, as long as the woman is holding the goods for Mrs. Wright who is being detained Admitting to collect. When the man was investigating the second floor, Mrs. Hale remembered the happy mood of Mrs. Wright before marrying. . After looking around the room, the women decided to take the quilt and take them, while the man rushed into the room before going to the barn, laughed at the idea of ​​quilt. At the same time, when the women were looking for a quilt, they found an empty bird cage and eventually found a dead bird in Mrs. Wright's sewing machine basket. The bird was strangled like John Wright. Mrs. Peters was hesitant to despise men who only obeyed the law, but she and Mrs. Hale decided to hide the evidence, and the men decided that whatever prevents her from being acquitted by a future jury I could not find any evidence. - Drama's hints are most likely to prove compassion for women In the summary by Susan Glaspell of the screenplay of "Trifles" in Susan Glaspell's play "Trifles" there are five characters, three men and two women. They lived in the house where Mr. White was killed last night. These people tried to find evidence to nominate murderers or motives and nominated Lady Wright as a murderer. When the man was downstairs, the woman saw herself around the kitchen and the living room. They noticed the canned fruits and facts of Mrs. Wright ... the assumptions and underestimation of the importance of the information may lead to wrong decisions and conviction. The stereotype that men are superior to women and the result of this ideology are the themes that Susan Grasspel appeared in the drama "Triful". This show features five members of the community trying to reveal evidence that may investigate crime scenes and answer the question of who murdered John Wright. The only obvious suspect in the play is Minnie, the wife of Light. Susan Glaspell 's play "Trifles" was written in 1916 and reflects the authors' attention to the cultural constraints of gender and gender roles. As the title of Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles" (Click here to see the full summary of the episode), women's attention is often considered obvious and is little or not important to the real work of society It is shown that. It is not important, of course, this is done by men. Graspel asked questions and this also included questions from readers and viewers, the relative value of male and female views and works, the establishment of a tense drama, two different stories, male and female We raised questions through development. . But as Holstein told her article, Grasper's question is not necessarily about women's role in society but how to evaluate or evaluate knowledge and opinion in a specific context.

Addy is a 9 year old girl who lives with Mother, Pappa, Sam, 15 year old brother, and 1 year old sister Ester. Eddie and her family are master slaves of the work of Master Stevens. Eddie, who was sleeping on a summer evening, heard that parents are talking about escape. Pappa wants to make Addy free. He was tired of seeing the children working hard. They are talking about how they seize opportunities. Dad wanted to wait until the war ended. He wants freedom and can freely run freely. The summary of the book is more valuable. Over the past five years, we saw the rise of these abstract handicrafts. Please search the bestseller on Amazon. When purchasing it may display a summary of the book. When you search on Google, you will see some free of charge. Services such as Blinkist and Get Abstract catalog thousands of abstracts of audio and text books. The summary of the book is worth because all the information in the book is not the same. They provide the most brief explanation of key ideas, stories, exercises and takeaways in this book. In this category we also include the author 's announcement (eg TEDx' s lecture, Google 's lecture) and author' s interview (eg podcast) in the book. These are brief summaries of books. Please read the summary of 2 or 3 books (Google search). About almost all books, there are some summaries of books that usually contain the best information in the book (20% of the idea produces 80% of the value). For clarity, I discuss here only about nonfiction books. Of course, this has nothing to do with the novel. Please read the first and last chapter of this book. Often the first and last chapters of the book contain the most valuable content (if you want to get lost in a novel, this obviously will not work). In addition, the first and last paragraph of each chapter contains important ideas of each chapter. With Google Books, free ebook samples, and Amazon's Look Inside feature, you can usually get the first and last chapters of the book for free. Blinkest and abstracting services of other books have incentives to continue to extend the library of books summarized. Everyone can decide whether or not to emphasize the quality and quantity of the book's summary. Since many book abstracting services recognize that there are thousands of types of books, we are finally pursuing the latter. Unfortunately, this usually means that the quality and accuracy of the summary begin to decline as more content is created.

Naturally, Emerson 's first book consists of an introduction and Chapter 8 covering all the basic ideas he will detail in his later life. The theme of this work, the harmony between man and nature, has also become the theoretical basis for many literary works created in the United States since the 19th century. The paper first criticized the dependence on the past and proposed to rely on itself to explore the world. Emerson supports the dualistic view of the universe when explaining the reason for confidence, he says it is divided into two parts: one part represents the soul's self, the other part represents the outer world He calls it nature, the latter belongs to the former. . In his view, there is a perfect correspondence between these two parts, so that people can communicate with the outside world. Nature is kind to him, and on the contrary the community often means a maze He believes that when communicating with nature, people can clear all concerns and ultimately achieve a strange alliance with the universe. In addition to psychic nutrition, nature provides a personal material need. At a higher level, it further realizes the aesthetic feelings of people, becomes a carrier of ideas, and cultivates a person's mind. Aesthetic theory is proposed under heading "America" ​​which compose chapter 3. Emerson distinguishes three kinds of beauty in nature: the beauty of the appearance is the lowest, the beauty of the spirit is based on virtue, and the intellectual beauty of seeking the absolute order of things Shisa Emerson's features can find a match between these three kinds of beauty. At the final level, they are just different representations of the same essence. "God is all fair, truth, kindness and beauty, but different faces of all people." Beauty, truth, the beauty of equations are typical of romantic aesthetics. " When discussing nature as a carrier of ideas, Emerson further detailed the correspondence between nature and soul. Begin your 48-hour free trial and unlock this 4-page Natural Study Guide to get the following: You can also access experts on over 30,000 guides and help questions with over 300,000 homework assignments. Whether it is important or informally condemning the records of all contacts (date, time, nature, contact summary) with the suspect, including drivers and abnormal events, no matter how important it is I recommend you to record regardless. This tells us that bringing suspect friends and relatives for suspects into contact with suspicious individuals and leaving records of indirect contacts initiated by the suspect. Notify the complainant to keep all notes, gifts, voicemail tapes and messages, e-mails and postings, and other evidence related to the police investigation. To avoid further distress and to avoid contamination evidence that may be required for forensic analysis requires the suspect not to handle or open items received from the suspect Problem statement: A text summary is used to describe a brief description of the original document and is used to provide the concept of the entire content of the entire content of the document. A summary of the document that is the subject of the message summary It is of different nature. . METHODS: A summary of one document appears to be capturing both of these information successfully, but the summary of multiple documents is not. The overall quality of the summary of the information provided is often absent. It is known that most existing methods tend to focus on sentence scoring and not so much on the content of contextual information in multiple documents. RESULTS: In this study, several investigations on multiple document summarization methods were proposed. I explained the general idea behind these methods. Conclusion: In addition to general ideas and concepts, we explain the advantages and limitations of these approaches. There are two general approaches to social science research, focusing on how people react naturally -

Executive summary In this report, London Underground looks for other ways in which prices can be changed to reduce the loss of total revenue. This report identifies and analyzes these alternatives to find the most appropriate way to increase the income of the London subway. The report will also examine how resilience plays an important role in deciding and determining the outcome of those decisions. The London subway is in a loss state, it is urgent to reverse the situation. I will begin with an executive summary. This is important because the executive summary needs to encapsulate or generalize the important concepts described in other parts of the plan. The executive summary is usually written after completing the other sections, but it will be displayed at the top of your strategic plan. This allows you to extract keypoints from other sections in the summary. The executive summary provides readers with an overview of what is included in the strategic plan. The topics described in the Executive Summary are explained in detail in the Strategic Planning section. Executive summary Like the manager's outline of the nonprofit business plan, the manager's outline of the nonprofit business plan explains the behavior and plan of the nonprofit business to the reader. This usually includes an organization's mission statement, the product or service being offered, and an overview of the funding source. In some non-profit business plans, the mission statement may be a different part. Products, services, or programs offered Similar to describing products or services offered by a business plan for business purposes, a nonprofit business plan describes its products or services and the plans to be offered It will have a section. As well as for-profit business plans, this section also highlights the specific needs of products, services, or programs that may help to satisfy certain products, services, and planned products. The executive summary executive summary is a summary of the length of the long research report or publication. The research report is often highly technical, but the purpose of the executive summary is to communicate in an easy way so that all readers can understand the information regardless of knowledge and expertise. Managers use the executive summary to understand the background of broader research policies and make decisions on changes in policy, planning, or investment decisions. Usually, the executive summary is 3-6 pages. Longer summaries are often used when charts and other illustrations are included. The executive summary should be organized according to the category of project summary, background, process, survey results and conclusions, and recommendations for action. The following is a description of the type of information you need to consider for each category. C: \ Documents and Settings \ Greg Waidley \ Local Settings \ Temporary Internet Files \ OLK 21 A \ Tips for writing Executive Summary. Doc 6/18/99

"A major change in Europe has brought a new, more vivid era in the Middle Ages, as European trade has increased, European people rediscovered classical knowledge of ancient Greece and Rome, The power and learning, known as the Renaissance, created new concerns about individuals who led new ideas about religion These ideas caused a struggle in Christianity called religious reform "(Ramirez, Stearns, Wineburg, 2008) The movement and movement of people after Black Pest and the Crusaders encouraged the development of a more global culture. In this module, I will learn about the influence of cultural and religious change in Europe after the Middle Ages. (Ramirez, Stearns, Wineburg, 2008) In Italy, the development of wealthy trade cities and a new way of thinking contributed to the revival of Renaissance art and learning. The Italian Renaissance art and architecture did not adopt a single style or method. On the contrary, in the works from 1350 to 1550, attitude changes were seen. The attitude of the Renaissance to people's values ​​influenced artists and architects. These talented people compete against each other for paid work, fame and wealth. The theme is beyond religious scenes beyond their place in reality people and nature. In addition, the work produced is not only for the glory of God but also for people to appreciate. (Ramirez, Stearns, Wineburg, 2008) By the Italian Renaissance, art and architecture has entered the present age. Not only are these paintings, sculptures and architecture not only beautiful but also moving, it also reflects the competition, achievement and contemporary people's interest in the world around us. Trade and printing expanded the Renaissance to northern Europe other than Italy and had various influences on artists and writers. By 1500, the growth of cities in Europe has expanded. The flow of trade to the inside and outside of the city brought it, the idea of ​​the Renaissance. Soon the movement of Italian craftsmen spread to the northern city of London. The leaders of the Northern Renaissance include Johannes Gutenberg, Erasmus, Sir Thomas More, William Shakespeare, Christine de Pisan, Albrecht Dürer, Jan van Eyck and Petrarch. (Ramirez, Stearns, Wineburg, 2008) Protestant reform is an objection to the criticism of the Roman Catholic Church. Religious reform brought about political and religious change. (Hillbrand, 1968) Many Catholics are aware of the need to reform the church and their work reaffirms the Catholic faith. (Hillbrand, 1968) Myers, P. (2007). The history of the resurrection medieval and contemporary (pp. 251 - 274). Boston: Jin. (Original published in 1905) Ramirez, S. , Stearns, P .; Goldberg, S .; (2008). World history of the Renaissance and reform Holt: Heritage of mankind (pp. 434 - 463). Austin, Texas: Holt, Reinhardt, Winston To review the importance of personal, political and economic rights by summary of content and reasons, it is necessary to review the responsibilities of individuals and citizens. In order for the constitutional democracy of the United States to prosper and to realize its ideal, citizens not only recognize their rights, but also exercise these rights with responsibility, and autonomy, freedom, justice We need to fulfill the personal and civic responsibilities we need. Citizens have to review the fundamental values ​​and principles of the Constitution of the United States and monitor the actions of political leaders and government agencies to ensure loyalty to them. In addition, they examine their own behaviors related to these values ​​and principles, and state that their responsibility may require their individual rights, aspirations or benefits to be subject to common interests Learn to handle properly. Executive Summary and theoretical grounds The purpose of constitutional democracy in the United States is to further review the constitutional principles and to improve the performance of political leaders and government a

The dawn by Octavia E. Butler is the first book of the Lilith's Brood trilogy. After the nuclear war which made the earth unable to live, most almost extinct human beings were saved by the alien race Oankali. Oankali is very different from humans. Unlike humans, Oankali has three types of gender: male, female, and Ooloi. Because they all have tentacles in their bodies, they see the world through their different perceptions. They can cause mutations in other organisms and can make offspring from genetic material. The name of the hero is Lilith Iyapo, who woke up 250 years after the end of the nuclear war and he found himself on an alien spaceship. At first she was tired of the difference of Oankali and I learned that their behavior is very strange. But later, Lilith formed an alliance with Ooloi called Nikanj and cooperated with Oankali to make it suitable for living the earth again. Instead, Oankali wants to intersect humans to create a hybrid Oankali / human and they believe it will benefit them and human beings. Lilith agreed, but no one agreed with her, they killed Lilith 's fellow Joseph. Humans were sent to the earth without Lilith and Lilith used the remaining Joseph DNA to accommodate the first mixed species from Nikanj. After applying for the section, it will take 24 hours to send the draft. The editor will review the submission contents and post contribution content or provide feedback. It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the article). They usually point out the point. Please read the last few paragraphs (20% from the last 10% of the article). They usually summarize the points Your job here is to write a summary of the article. Those who have never read this article should understand the meaning of it simply by reading your summary. Copy the summary and paste it in the text box under "I do not want to adopt the outline of people using inappropriate grammar". This is the reason. ""

Abstract: "Vinnie Ream" in "Smithson" magazine published in August 2000 tells the story of a woman chosen to carve the famous American statue in the 1800s, including Abraham Lincoln . Despite lack of experience. This article outlines the life of Winnie Rem and the political struggle caused by her mission. The article first discusses how the government decided to use statues to commemorate civil war hero David Farragut. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficient time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one of the meanings "the speaker is headed to the store") It is understood that the abstract is smaller than the original text, and using the same word Yes. Most commonly, when we provide a summary we are taking the "point" of the work. We must judge what is important and what we can do. This is the version of the "Clean House" program on TV. What do you protect and what do you cast? Then we will organize what we keep, it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly confirm the plot, the second one is a long summary for those who want to know more details, including small ones ("Oops. I am reading Summary). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth discussed Salem's trials and they all realized that things were uncontrollable (John though the court still believed that no one will hang up). Elizabeth told John that he must enter the city and tell him that Abigail is lying. John's hesitancy led to an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust, which is still widespread in their marriage. The summary description summarizes key concepts in several sentences or short paragraphs. The abstract is much shorter than the original, capturing only the main idea. If you want to refer to the broad concept discussed by the author, you do not need to record specific details, use the overview description. Directly quote the exact expression used in the original source and enclose the cited document in quotation marks. It is a good strategy to copy direct references when authors express ideas in a particularly vibrant or memorable way. However, please do not depend only on the direct reference in the memo.

Socrates met Euthyphro outside the Athens court. Socrates was taken to the court for rude Meletus, and Euthyphro sued his own father for killing the accidentally murdered employee. Socrates scared Euthyphro, if Euthyphro wants to sue his own father for such a suspicious accusation, he must be a great expert in religious affairs. Euthyphro agrees that he knows everything about sacred things. Socrates led him to Yous Philo and urged him to teach something sacred. First, Euthyphro believes that holiness is the persecution of religious criminals. Socrates believes that this definition is inadequate, as there are many sacred acts besides persecuting criminals. He asked Euthyphro to give him a common definition to determine common features of all sacred works. Euthyphro believes that sacredness is the consent of God, Socrates points out that God is often quarreling, so that for a person one may not agree with anyone. The most important attempt by Euthyphro to try to define justice comes from his advice that sacred things are recognized by all gods. Socrates suggested a rather complicated argument that the two could not be equal. Holy ones are recognized as being sacred, so that the holy ones determine what is recognized by God. What God approves in turn determines what God approves. From this reasoning, God 's things can not be the same as those accepted by God. One of them decides what God approves and the other decides God's approval. Euthyphro then suggests that sanctity is a kind of justice, especially a kind of justice that cherishes the gods. Socrates wanted to understand the meaning of Euthyphro by "looking after God". Of course, the gods are omnipotent, we do not need to take care of them or help them in some way. The last recommendation of Euthyphro is that sanctity is a deal with God and we give them a sacrifice and a prayer that they will give us. Our sacrifice does not just help them, they just satisfy it. But Socrates pointed out that saying that holiness is a satisfying god is the same as being recognized by God by Holiness. Instead of trying to find a better definition Euthyphro got angry and lost the doubts of Socrates. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficiently long time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one meaning "the speaker is heading to the store") The summary is understood to be smaller than the original sentence, and the same words may be used . Most commonly, when we provide a summary, we are taking the "point" of the work. We have to decide what is important and what can happen. This is the version of the TV "Clean House" program. What will we protect and throw what? Then we will organize what we keep as it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the art

The chain of Laurie Halse Anderson, published by Simon & Schuster in 2008, is a young adult novel. The main character is a 13 - year - old slave who worked with Isabelle, Manhattan 's faithful family, Rock' n 's sister Ruth. Isabelle suffered from the atrocities of Mrs. Rockton. She is a despicable and miserable woman herself is abused by her husband. The relationship between her husband and her husband is abused physically and in words. Isabel and his sister's fate are intertwined with opportunities for slavery and freedom. Former boss of Rhode Island Miss Mary Finch promised freedom before dying. She also taught slaves to read and write. When Miss Mary Finch died, there was no evidence document of her commitment to freedom. As a result, her nephew inherited her heritage and soon sold Isabelle and Ruth to Rockton. When they were waiting for that sale, Isabel thought it was running. Irish servant Jenny warned Isabel not to run away. Isabel often reconsider this decision This novel was held on the day before the Revolutionary War. The UK takes over New York City. Isabel is confused about whether to support royalty and rebels (colonizers). Both sides use slaves. Isabel soon discovered that both the royalist and Tree supported slavery. She and the women's group heard the sense of American independence war. Master Rockton and the Conservative Party are planning to end disobedient revolts Rebel factions approached Isabel, helped her find her sister and offered to guarantee her freedom. As a slave, Yusung persuaded her to watch the owner of the British invasion information. Each chapter begins with an advertisement, a leaflet, a newspaper article, or a letter of that period. Tomah Spain's common sense and excerpts from letters from Washington, Franklin and Adams appear throughout the novel. These elements give the reader a sense of time and place, helping to present the position of Isabel in these important historical events. Critics like Anderson's fast paced novels and speech. This work has been well studied, and as the United States is developing, research on slavery has been done. SuperSummary is the newest alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, providing high quality study guides including detailed chapter summaries and main themes, character analysis, citation and thesis topics. This one page guide contains a summary of the episodes of Laurie Halse Anderson and a simple analysis of Chains. Laurie Halse Anderson's chain drama is a historical novel based on the American Revolutionary War. This is the first novel in the American species series. From a slave perspective, the chain is unique in the depiction of the revolution. This novel has done different research on the hypocritical nature of the revolution. Patriots fight for freedom - but only a little. The chain examines what happens to those who did not gain freedom during the revolution. The novel is fictitious, but the story explores in detail the events that occurred in history. Barzilay and Elhadad claim that the most popular discourse theme will play an important role in abstracts and vocabulary chains provide a better indication of the subject of discourse than the frequency of words. They define the strength of the vocabulary chain by the length defined as the number of words found as members of the same chain and their homogeneity and the number of different vocabulary items in the homogeneity acquisition chain is divided by that length . They create a summary by extracting the sentence for each strong chain and selecting the first sentence of the document containing the representative words of the chain. Vocabulary chains attempt to express topics being discussed throughout text or text segments. They determine the importance of sentences by capturing the semantic similarity between noun phrases. In the vocabulary chaining approach, we use intuition that the subject does not use a single word, but is represented using different related wor

This week I annotated it using the summary example and created a summary title for the class. As a class, we read the four different summaries of the same non-fiction article and put them together in 1 to 4. Four of them are the most powerful summaries, which contain clear main ideas and support the main idea details. Important details, and selection of specific words. When I moved the summary on the graph (I used a removable tape to move the summary) I annotated them using a post summary and put down the characteristics of each summary. This will help students to understand the characteristics of each level summary and to think about where their own summary is in our continuum. Students and their writing partners read and reflect their abstracts, use continuums, and annotate their abstracts When time runs out, the group will share the summary with the class. As an example, the summary is "application of laws that do not provide equal protection for everything does not apply to countries that cause repression and weakening." Discussion on summaries is important. Students listen to each other and explain their reasoning. The teacher checks, understands and removes misunderstandings. The final summary is negotiated and recorded in the course. Students record abstracts in handouts Important keypoints and lengths are adequate 39 Feedback provides suggestions for improving the summary (eg include more in paragraph 2 rather than paragraph 1). Students will then improve the summary, resubmit and decide how to receive feedback on the new summary. The revision will continue until the summary reaches the given coverage and length limit. A summary of Street's feedback practice is consistent with the recommendation of the Mentor and Counseling Institute. This suggests that feedback is most useful when giving the user the responsibility to decide what to do next.

The Republic, written by Plato, has considered a lot. It's mainly about a good life. Plato seems to believe that a perfect life can only be guided under perfect conditions. It is a perfect society. In a perfect society, there must be justice. In the Republic, justice seems to be defined in various ways. In this article, I will discuss some. First of all, Glaucon and Adeimantus argue that justice is a bad thing and that we believe better to send an unfair life. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC) As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.

As Socrates of Plato Republic explains, wisdom, courage, kindness, and justice are the four basic virtues that an ideal country must establish. Among the eight books of the Socrates dialogue, the concept of ideal conditions and justice is controversial at the individual and national level. A detailed description of the perfect state and how it works. Socrates covers all aspects of political life and how it should work, saying, "Until power and philosophy become exactly the same ... the city will not have any form of cheating". Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC)

Republic of Plato Plato was one of the most intellectual and influential thinkers in Western philosophy, born around 425 BC. Plato investigated a wide range of topics. What dominates his idea is a great discourse called the Republic. Plato's main focus is a perfect society. Due to complaints about political life, he outlined Utopian society. Plato experienced the Peloponnesus War (431 - 404 BC), most of which were destroyed. This caused poverty, political turmoil and corruption. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

In the first volume of the Republic of Plato, Trasimachus believes that morality is an advantage of the strong. To support his view, Thrasymachus initially claims that the government as a stronger party passed the law at all times according to its own interests, then claimed that the subject must always comply with these laws Did. Socrates discussed two sets of counterarguments. First, by distinguishing clear and practical benefits as stronger, Socrates believes that it is sometimes not the actual benefit of the ruler that the subject is subject to law. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

A violent argument about the nature of justice in Trashimachus, Poremarchus, Kraitophon, Socrates in the first volume of the Republic Plato caused an interesting argument that it will go back and forth between justice as a "benefit of the strong" (15). . Since Socrates appeals to the responsibilities and abilities of experts in their respective fields, it is obvious that they have proposed more robust and logical objections and that they will benefit not only from themselves but also throughout humanity. is. In Plato's claim and Thrasymachus's answer, it is easy to observe evidence by text. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Plato's contribution to the history of political theory, republican critics of the Republic of Plato formed two different views on the inference behind this work. The first group believed that the Republic certainly was a model of political society, but the other group strongly opposed it, pointed out that society is too great to succeed in these proposed ways Did. In the communication between Creo and Dionysius, this discussion was first introduced, Clio supports a political model that the Republic agrees to be reality, and Dionysius represents people who suspect it is reality. And argues that it is a critic. General politics As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Introduction Plato's philosophy began to appear in dialogue. What is the important element of this concept? Intermediate dialogue is dominated by formal theory. This is Plato's theory which evolved from some of the rarely stated assumptions held by Socrates. Socrates believes that the reason why he and his interlocutors could not find the definition of things is because they are trapped in case-based examples. To be brave means to fight people who are stronger than yourself. Or it means withdrawing from the battle and having the courage to accept the contemptious insults that follow. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

At the time, Plato and Aristotle were very influential people, bringing abundant knowledge to the world. To be honest, in democracy, but I think that there are many advantages, there are a common side effects are a number. In all of the important thought of Plato, his most good idea, democracy for the majority of people can not think about the community is that making a political decision. On the other hand, Aristotle because it is a very optimistic about democracy, comparison of the comparison and men has become very interesting. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

In ancient Athens, the king of philosophers far exceeded others. In his own danger, in constant political turmoil and corruption, Plato took a brave position for justice, freedom and equality. The Republic was written around 375 BC. It is not only the explanation of the ideal state of Plato but also the journey of the heart from ignorance to enlightenment. Plato is still at his college - the first university in Europe - to teach that political science is the science of the soul. In fact, Plato's wisdom is a prominent example of foresightable excellence, where purely virtue allows the greatest human freedom possible by law, so any freedom is consistent with it . As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is quite different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

At the beginning of the first volume of the Republic of Plato, we will introduce the narrator, Socrates and his companion. But through Polemarchus and others' claims, they understand the special charm of Socrates and gifts of intellectuals. Intonation is arbitrary, language and expression are very simple as in Plato's dialogue. But Plato's unaffected style has at least two objectives. On the one hand it matches Socrates' own unique irony that attracts "fools" by impersonating ignorance, because it obscures the complexity and height of thinking, then the master can prove what he did Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is quite different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Plato's ideal society depends on people's fair actions. In his utopia, all men and women can maximize their possibilities and in turn use their talents and skills for the benefit of all. This complete society has been criticized and criticized based on the several extreme factors it has: Plato's ideal society citizens can suppress their own interests. It is accustomed to believing that they are participating in collective efforts and choosing to follow the rule of philosopher king for all the benefits. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

The Republic of Plato explores the meaning of justice from a personal and social point of view. I am also studying how to integrate justice into human society, that is, how to create an ideal state of social order in society. This is accomplished through various dialogues and controversies between Socrates and other people. In this process, Socrates conducted a detailed analysis of the ideal nation's formation, structure and organization, thus proving the intrinsic value of the righteous as a society and the virtue that everyone must have. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. In Plato's work "Republic" there is a question as to whether the existence exists systematically. Because the Republic itself is an attempt to answer questions about human behavior, that is justice. In order to solve the problem of justice, Plato considers the relationship between the ideal city state, the autonomous collective unit, and the realization of the structure and justice of the republic. Plato thinks that the philosopher's king ought to be the ruler, as all philosophers are trying to find an ideal city state. "Calipolis" or a beautiful city is a legitimate city, political control depends on knowledge, the philosopher's king owns not power but power. In theory, it would be ideal if republics and modern states were dominated by knowledge rather than power, power is extremely important in the composition of political activities. This is a flaw in the discussion of Plato, which will be discussed in this paper. At the same time, some features of contemporary countries are consistent with an ideal city city that is inevitable.

(Republic 434a) In other words, according to Plato, justice is only performing missions assigned to them naturally. . This is the basic idea of ​​his ideal city. It knows both what justice is and what the city people can accomplish. This politics of an ideal city means that only certain types of talent have the ability to participate in politics, just as certain talents have the ability to engage in the timber industry I will. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

When reading the Republic there is no reason to search for an argument justifying Plato's justice which requires ordinary justice ("inner justice" or "spiritual harmony"). The relationship between inner justice and ordinary justice in the Republic of Plato is not important. We note that Plato tried to argue from the first book that the true source of normality lies in the knowledge gained by philosophical rationality. And decisively important is the relationship between inner justice and behavior, which will create a fair city. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

In the first part of the Republic of Plato, several definitions of justice and injustice were investigated. Cephalus, Polemarchus, Glaucon, Thracymicus all share their views and thoughts about what they believe to be fair behavior. Meanwhile, Socrates poses questions on every aspect of the definition. In the first book, Socrates believed that cheating was beneficial but was eventually challenged by Thracymicus who convinced him that his definition was ineffective. Cephalus talks about integrity and justification, Polemarchus explores the idea of ​​giving attempted behavior to people, Glaucon is seeing justice as a result of its consequences, but Socrates justice does not harm anyone I believe. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.

The Republic of Plato is in Plato Republic, where Glaucon is introduced to readers as a lover of honor, gender, luxury. When the Republic has brought together the book and the discussion of Socrates about the reasons and reasons for these disadvantages to make the soul unhappy, Glaucon ties some of these incidents into his own life, and how Socrates' inference I started watching. How is it from himself? When Glaucon noticed this, he began his way of changing his view of happiness, which can be proved by the way he answered in Socrates' words. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.