Summary:

The model of Democritus shows that the substance consists of invisible particles called atoms and voids (spaces). He said that the atom is immortal and can not be changed. They are also homogeneous, which means they have no internal structure. His atomic model is solid and shows that all atoms differ in size, shape, mass, position and arrangement, and there is a gap between them.

Democritus was a Greek living between 460 BC and 370 BC, his idea was based on reasoning rather than science, and borrowed two Greek philosophers. Teaching: Leucippus and Anaxagoras

Democritus knows that if you cut stone in half, each piece has the same properties as the original stone. He guesses that as you continue mincing the stones finer and finer, at some point you will get a small piece of debris so that it can no longer divide.

Democritus calls these infinitely small substance atoms "inseparable". He believes that atomos are eternal and can not be destroyed. Democritus believes that the materials that atoms give to them are specific. In other words, unlike other material atoms like fur, the stone atoms are unique to the stone. This is an amazing theory that attempts to explain the entire physical world with a few ideas.

In the end, however, the two most famous philosophers of ancient Greece, Aristotle and Plato, rejected the theory of democracy. Aristotle accepted the theory of Empedocles (Epedo Docleus believes that all substances are made up of four elements: fire, air, water, and the earth. Nature). Aristotle has joined a unique (false) idea that the four core elements can transform each other

Because of the great influence of Aristotle, the theory of Democritus has to wait nearly 2000 for it to be rediscovered.

The purpose of Greek philosophers is to explain the natural world. At the end of the phenomenon they observed, there was a "big problem". This big problem has been fixed in various ways by creating all other content.

Democritus extended this theory and stated that the material is no longer "splittable" and consists of small particles called "atoms". All of these atoms are composed of the same main substances and the only difference between them is their size, shape, mass, position and arrangement. The difference in these characteristics explains the difference in the nature of things around us.

The early thought of atomic theory and structure: Democritus to Dalton, author: Dr. Anthony Carpi adapted

Write a review rather than a summary: Ensure that the summary of the topic does not exceed one-third of the paper. The main part of the paper should be evaluation rather than summary. The summary can be evaluated separately, or summarized as part of the assessment. The article sentences should accurately describe your idea. You may wish to predict your body by including the main reasons for evaluation in the texts of the paper. (For example, movie XXX is very suitable for taking a break to university students due to comedy comedy, intense action, and a wonderful visual effect.)

Writing abstracts is not limited to English courses. You can take many other courses and you may need to write a summary. The summary is a report of the author's view. Summary Rewrite what you read in your own language. The summary can be thought of as a short version of the original writing. You should tell the reader what the main focus and focus. Your abstract should include the main discussion of paper or paper. In summary, you should not write to include your comments or what you think the author is trying to imply. You should focus only on what the author wrote. Please do not include evaluation by readers in abstract. You should not write a strong or weak argument that you think is the author.

In the second paragraph, I will write an accurate summary of the main idea of ​​the work. Do not confuse this summary with your own evaluation. Instead, use the abstract to describe the most important idea the author is trying to convey throughout the work, and other literary details that may lead or encourage the reader. Please criticize the author's speech in this section. Please write a series of questions when writing a review. Does the author provide accurate and appropriate data in a reasonable way? Does the author clearly define important terms? Does the author provide reasonable explanation? Please pay attention to this paragraph whether the author has achieved the purpose of creating this article.