3 Responses to “My Beliefs About the Basic Nature of Human Beings: Good vs. Bad, Flawed vs. Functional”
[2023-08-20 01:36:00]
First of all, humans are totally gentle. It is worth every single of us to live. This is axiomatic. Young children are the best way to get into this belief; for young children there is nothing evil, not neutrality, only obvious absolute good comes with it, good is our life It is essential. One of the reasons is that the exact difference between childhood and us is simply a collection of events.
Secondly, humans are born with joy and creativity. As long as we are not very confused, we always learn to be crazy and always adapt to what we have learned.
Thirdly, humans are naturally enthusiastic about building close relationships with others. As long as we are not very confused, we will build and maintain a network of emotional support and physically emotional people.
Fourth, humans have a great natural tendency. In other words, we can now be the most courageous, gentle, smart, and fair thing possible at any time. Unlike gentleness, wonderful things can deny us through the environment, but we can not make a big trend
Fifth, our big trend has two obstacles. It is ignorance and chaos. Ignorance does not understand the world. Because we do not touch it or have not developed a tool to understand it. Confusion is something misunderstanding based on our response to painful and horrible events. Under the influence of ignorance and confusion, humans act in a way that is not so good. We are still brave, the most kind, the brightest and most fairer, but unfortunately someone put people in the gas room, drain the wetlands to build a mansion, It seems to be.
Finally, believing that humanity is good and functional is the best starting point for understanding the complexity of human ethics. People have misleading conflicts, sometimes even terrible conflicts of interest. It is easy to imagine that some people simply are bad, or just meaningless. And in this simplified state, we can make the cycle of violence and pain permanent. As long as I have the ability, I will overcome the complexity of reality, understand all aspects, respond to everyone in each dialogue, and make efforts to be as sympathetic as possible.
Good and evil. Good and evil. Before learning to speak, humans begin to learn the difference - fortunately. Our success is largely due to our ability to deduce morally. It is an adhesive that brings together the human social groups and is the key to our passionate and effective collaboration. We (the most believed) are the only moral subjects on earth - but this may not last long. This day may come soon when we are forced to share this position with new existence and the wisdom of this existence is designed by ourselves.
In this psychology course, we learned a lot about topics that apply to everyday life. One of the concepts we learned in class was nature and child rearing (or Nazism and empiricism). Discussions between nature and cultivation have a greater impact on you; the features we have (nature) or the characteristics we acquire through personal experience (nurture). In my opinion, I personally think that training has a greater impact on individuals.
There is no difficult answer for this discussion. There is no way to actually tell what made these people their monsters ("psychological investigation of serial killers"; "nature and cultivation"). Of course, everyone is born with a different genetic structure, and many people think that the genetic code difference does not produce psychological homicide ("Continuous Murderer: Nature and Child Rearing"). However, observing the lives and experiences of continuous killers clearly shows that cultivation plays a leading role in the creation of continuous killers. This is still a controversial topic. To support their theory of causing these monsters, different criminologists point out different serial killers