Plato 's Euthyphro imperfection seems to be the other Platonic conversation, Euthyphro tries to reveal the definition of virtue. In this case, virtue is pious. Finally, the dialogue can not reveal this definition, giving an incomplete impression. Because of the dual consequences of dialogue - the emergence of the spirit of Socrates and the Greeks can not define faith - interpretation of its imperfection often overemphasizes Socrates, hence discovering its true origin Can not do it. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious. The following is an excerpt from the dialogue of Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher called Euthyphro. Please let me tell you the content of the conversation. Because I only give you an extract. Socrates and Euthyphro have two roles. Prosecutor Euthyphro was accused of being rude in doubt that he murdered his father. Socrates and Euthyphro started talking about it. Socrates asked in his typical Socratic way: "What is pious?" To answer this question, we did a lot of dialogue.

Plato 's Euthyphro imperfection seems to be the other Platonic conversation, Euthyphro tries to reveal the definition of virtue. In this case, virtue is pious. Finally, the dialogue can not reveal this definition, giving an incomplete impression. Because of the dual consequences of dialogue - the emergence of the spirit of Socrates and the Greeks can not define faith - interpretation of its imperfection often overemphasizes Socrates, hence discovering its true origin Can not do it. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious. The following is an excerpt from the dialogue of Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher called Euthyphro. Please let me tell you the content of the conversation. Because I only give you an extract. Socrates and Euthyphro have two roles. Prosecutor Euthyphro was accused of being rude in doubt that he murdered his father. Socrates and Euthyphro started talking about it. Socrates asked in his typical Socratic way: "What is pious?" To answer this question, we did a lot of dialogue.

Please imagine that it is trapped in high seas by a lifeboat capable of accommodating up to 50 people. Who will put you, who will save you. Let's think about; there are a total of 175 people to live the same life as the next person. For individuals responsible for the situation, this may be a difficult decision. Individuals can make final decisions in various ways, but it can be traced back to their background in their personal motives and ethical decisions. The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. In his conversation, Euthyphro, Plato proposed a theological dilemma surrounding the relationship between God (or god) and morality. Since this dilemma began, almost all religions in the world have tried to solve the problem that it presents. In particular, the monotheism formed after the golden age of Greece paid special attention to this problem in doctrine and philosophy, Muslim theologians basically solved this problem. Presence, its theologians and philosophers proposed a series of solutions without a clear agreement. Although theological spontaneism is such a solution, when trying to answer Euthyphro's dilemma, theological autocracy rejects moral realism and distorts the essence of perfect God.

Please imagine that it is trapped in high seas by a lifeboat capable of accommodating up to 50 people. Who will put you, who will save you. Let's think about; there are a total of 175 people to live the same life as the next person. For individuals responsible for the situation, this may be a difficult decision. Individuals can make final decisions in various ways, but it can be traced back to their background in their personal motives and ethical decisions. The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. In his conversation, Euthyphro, Plato proposed a theological dilemma surrounding the relationship between God (or god) and morality. Since this dilemma began, almost all religions in the world have tried to solve the problem that it presents. In particular, the monotheism formed after the golden age of Greece paid special attention to this problem in doctrine and philosophy, Muslim theologians basically solved this problem. Presence, its theologians and philosophers proposed a series of solutions without a clear agreement. Although theological spontaneism is such a solution, when trying to answer Euthyphro's dilemma, theological autocracy rejects moral realism and distorts the essence of perfect God.

Euthyphro's dilemma in Prato's dialogue "Euthyphro", Socrates suggested a choice to Euthyphro. Euthyphro reacts by arguing that belief is an accepted [love] or acknowledged acceptance by God; rude is that God does not agree. But as Socrates pointed out, this problem would be a dilemma for those who believe Euthyphro has only God's authority to reveal the truth. The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. In the platonic dialogue "Euthyphro" there is a famous word that "Pious (τ ὸὸ σ ι υ υ, that is, morally good) is loved by the gods Is it loveed by God that it is godly? Or is it pious? "This is what people think of morality. Another important topic being widely discussed in Abraham's monotheistic religious philosophy is human free will and the question of God's omniscience. The omniscience of God, including perfect understanding of the future, leads theological determinism, which may conflict with free will of mankind. Regarding this point, there are various positions such as liberalism (free will is true) and reservation.

Euthyphro's dilemma in Prato's dialogue "Euthyphro", Socrates suggested a choice to Euthyphro. Euthyphro reacts by arguing that belief is an accepted [love] or acknowledged acceptance by God; rude is that God does not agree. But as Socrates pointed out, this problem would be a dilemma for those who believe Euthyphro has only God's authority to reveal the truth. The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. In the platonic dialogue "Euthyphro" there is a famous word that "Pious (τ ὸὸ σ ι υ υ, that is, morally good) is loved by the gods Is it loveed by God that it is godly? Or is it pious? "This is what people think of morality. Another important topic being widely discussed in Abraham's monotheistic religious philosophy is human free will and the question of God's omniscience. The omniscience of God, including perfect understanding of the future, leads theological determinism, which may conflict with free will of mankind. Regarding this point, there are various positions such as liberalism (free will is true) and reservation.

One of the most interesting and influential thinkers in the history of Plato is Socrates, and its devotion to its prudent reasoning helped shape the foundation of philosophy. Socrates used logical techniques to find the truth. Therefore, he does not explain exactly the nature of things, but doubts everything and decides to accept everything. He is known for his philosophical thought, but since Socrates does not write anything, we rely on his students like Plato for a detailed understanding of his methods and ways. Research questions Plato's Euthyphro: 1 in Plato, 5 dialogues, Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990, pp. 6 - 16, (2a - 11b) 1. Where does Socrates go when Socrates met Yutoflor? Judge his own embarrassment 2. Where is Euthyphro? why? In the same trial, his father was convicted of murder. 3. How is the situation of Euthyphro's father? The man was tied to the groove, and the servant of the family killed the slave with drunken wrath. Then the father sent someone to the prophet and found what he should do for him. Before the answer came, the man died of captivity. Well then, do you think he committed a murder? Most were mistakenly killed. Socrates is known for its irony. At least three paragraphs were pointed out on the first five pages of Socrates' s ironic dialogue. 2 times 6 He said that meletas may be wise (2 d), and Meretas first took away the corruption, then took care of the young people and then take care of the elderly in the city. What is this? 7. 8 In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is

One of the most interesting and influential thinkers in the history of Plato is Socrates, and its devotion to its prudent reasoning helped shape the foundation of philosophy. Socrates used logical techniques to find the truth. Therefore, he does not explain exactly the nature of things, but doubts everything and decides to accept everything. He is known for his philosophical thought, but since Socrates does not write anything, we rely on his students like Plato for a detailed understanding of his methods and ways. Research questions Plato's Euthyphro: 1 in Plato, 5 dialogues, Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990, pp. 6 - 16, (2a - 11b) 1. Where does Socrates go when Socrates met Yutoflor? Judge his own embarrassment 2. Where is Euthyphro? why? In the same trial, his father was convicted of murder. 3. How is the situation of Euthyphro's father? The man was tied to the groove, and the servant of the family killed the slave with drunken wrath. Then the father sent someone to the prophet and found what he should do for him. Before the answer came, the man died of captivity. Well then, do you think he committed a murder? Most were mistakenly killed. Socrates is known for its irony. At least three paragraphs were pointed out on the first five pages of Socrates' s ironic dialogue. 2 times 6 He said that meletas may be wise (2 d), and Meretas first took away the corruption, then took care of the young people and then take care of the elderly in the city. What is this? 7. 8 In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is

In Euthyphro and the Republic I. Euthyphro, Euthyphro himself made three pious proposals. First of all, the godly thing is to appeal the offenders and the godly thing is not to sue the criminals. Socrates believes that this example lacks universality. I believe that he has to find a form that reverents on all pious acts to define faith. An example of polite behavior can not define godliness. The second attempt by Euthyphro shows that godly people are loved by God and pious people are disliked by them. For example, in Euthyphro, Socrates asked Euthyphro to provide a devout definition. Euthyphro replied that devotion is loved by God. But Socrates also made Euthyphro consent to what God is quarreling about, their quarrel is like a human quarrel and includes objects of love and hatred. Therefore, the reason for Socrates is that at least one thing has God 's love, but the other gods hate it. Again, Euthyphro agrees. Socrates has concluded that at least one thing is godly and devout if Euthyphro's godliness definition is acceptable - Euthyphro admits this to be ridiculous. Therefore, through this dialectic, Euthyphro noticed that he did not have enough meaning for the definition of religion. Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith) In the Euthyphro dialogue, the dilemma was related to the discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro. Discussion is about godliness. Euthyphro believes his behavior is godly; Socrates requests him to define "godly". Euthyphro's answer is "... confidence is what all the gods love and that kind of rude is what they hate." But Socrates then asks whether God likes to be godly for reasons that it is godly or because they like it and are religious. Socrates wants Euthyphro to prove the usage of logic. He can not do this because the sacred command theory has not been thoroughly reviewed. essay.com/The Euthyphro Dilemma versus The Sacred Command Theory explores two theories explaining moral behavior.

In Euthyphro and the Republic I. Euthyphro, Euthyphro himself made three pious proposals. First of all, the godly thing is to appeal the offenders and the godly thing is not to sue the criminals. Socrates believes that this example lacks universality. I believe that he has to find a form that reverents on all pious acts to define faith. An example of polite behavior can not define godliness. The second attempt by Euthyphro shows that godly people are loved by God and pious people are disliked by them. For example, in Euthyphro, Socrates asked Euthyphro to provide a devout definition. Euthyphro replied that devotion is loved by God. But Socrates also made Euthyphro consent to what God is quarreling about, their quarrel is like a human quarrel and includes objects of love and hatred. Therefore, the reason for Socrates is that at least one thing has God 's love, but the other gods hate it. Again, Euthyphro agrees. Socrates has concluded that at least one thing is godly and devout if Euthyphro's godliness definition is acceptable - Euthyphro admits this to be ridiculous. Therefore, through this dialectic, Euthyphro noticed that he did not have enough meaning for the definition of religion. Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith) In the Euthyphro dialogue, the dilemma was related to the discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro. Discussion is about godliness. Euthyphro believes his behavior is godly; Socrates requests him to define "godly". Euthyphro's answer is "... confidence is what all the gods love and that kind of rude is what they hate." But Socrates then asks whether God likes to be godly for reasons that it is godly or because they like it and are religious. Socrates wants Euthyphro to prove the usage of logic. He can not do this because the sacred command theory has not been thoroughly reviewed. essay.com/The Euthyphro Dilemma versus The Sacred Command Theory explores two theories explaining moral behavior.

He insists that there are many sacred acts besides religious opponents persecuting. Likewise, he often cites gods quarreling among them. Therefore, they agree on different things. Therefore, Socrates believes that there is no intrinsic understanding of sanctity among different individuals (Plato. & Gallop, 1997). In the second attempt, Eu thyphro believed that sanctity was recognized by all the gods. But Socrates believes that sacredness and what God recognizes can not be the same. Euthyphro is a work by Plato written in the form of a dialogue between a man named Socrates and Euthyphro, a teacher of Plato. The purpose of this work is to examine and define the meaning of godliness and sanctity. It took a couple of weeks before Socrates' famous trial, eventually forced to commit suicide by drinking a Tuga. At the beginning of the dialogue, the two men were waiting for a preliminary hearing at the Alcon Vajirus Court. Euthyphro has reached his father's claim. That worker killed a slave and his father left the worker in the groove while waiting to see what to do. Euthyphro - Plato discusses Euthyphro, Socrates and Euthyphro 's faithful / holy concept. This article not only tests your philosophical concepts and the recognition and participation ability to analysis, but also asks you to create your own definition of sanctity as a conversation participant. Read Euthyphro and write a paper to do the following. Explain how the concept of sanctity appears in a conversation, and why it occupies an important position in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. Please explain how Socrates reproached each definition of Yutoflo after introducing the three definitions used by Yutoflor according to Socrates. Please state your own argument about what Socrates is aiming for in this dialogue. How do you know that this is his goal? What features of the dialogue are consistent with your interpretation of the goal? Provide your own pious / holy definition, then create Socrates reaction / criticize your definition PLATO'S Other dialogue is a clear example of the definition of Socrates' dialogue. The concept to be defined is the concept of sanctity or godliness (z 6 r needs to be defined in the initial dialogue, Euthyphro is trying to sue his father for murder Socrates is then I am wondering if Euthyphro's piousness and obvious knowledge is sufficient to not act when sueing his father The results of the search are well known and Euthyphro's efforts are all canceled Conversation There was not enough definition of piousness at the end of.

He insists that there are many sacred acts besides religious opponents persecuting. Likewise, he often cites gods quarreling among them. Therefore, they agree on different things. Therefore, Socrates believes that there is no intrinsic understanding of sanctity among different individuals (Plato. & Gallop, 1997). In the second attempt, Eu thyphro believed that sanctity was recognized by all the gods. But Socrates believes that sacredness and what God recognizes can not be the same. Euthyphro is a work by Plato written in the form of a dialogue between a man named Socrates and Euthyphro, a teacher of Plato. The purpose of this work is to examine and define the meaning of godliness and sanctity. It took a couple of weeks before Socrates' famous trial, eventually forced to commit suicide by drinking a Tuga. At the beginning of the dialogue, the two men were waiting for a preliminary hearing at the Alcon Vajirus Court. Euthyphro has reached his father's claim. That worker killed a slave and his father left the worker in the groove while waiting to see what to do. Euthyphro - Plato discusses Euthyphro, Socrates and Euthyphro 's faithful / holy concept. This article not only tests your philosophical concepts and the recognition and participation ability to analysis, but also asks you to create your own definition of sanctity as a conversation participant. Read Euthyphro and write a paper to do the following. Explain how the concept of sanctity appears in a conversation, and why it occupies an important position in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. Please explain how Socrates reproached each definition of Yutoflo after introducing the three definitions used by Yutoflor according to Socrates. Please state your own argument about what Socrates is aiming for in this dialogue. How do you know that this is his goal? What features of the dialogue are consistent with your interpretation of the goal? Provide your own pious / holy definition, then create Socrates reaction / criticize your definition PLATO'S Other dialogue is a clear example of the definition of Socrates' dialogue. The concept to be defined is the concept of sanctity or godliness (z 6 r needs to be defined in the initial dialogue, Euthyphro is trying to sue his father for murder Socrates is then I am wondering if Euthyphro's piousness and obvious knowledge is sufficient to not act when sueing his father The results of the search are well known and Euthyphro's efforts are all canceled Conversation There was not enough definition of piousness at the end of.

In one of the first accounting known as Plato, we met a very interesting person called Socrates; the ambition of a person seeking knowledge inevitably had a great impact on humans. Most importantly, the way to get this knowledge makes him very attractive. This method is called ironic in Socrates in the literature. In any case, as Socrates depicts the sense of modesty of wisdom, I will introduce the extreme signs of this method of Plato. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports a platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to the so-called expert with such skills and insight - Euthyphro - in this case, and that the latter lacked real understanding I made it clear. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

In one of the first accounting known as Plato, we met a very interesting person called Socrates; the ambition of a person seeking knowledge inevitably had a great impact on humans. Most importantly, the way to get this knowledge makes him very attractive. This method is called ironic in Socrates in the literature. In any case, as Socrates depicts the sense of modesty of wisdom, I will introduce the extreme signs of this method of Plato. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports a platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to the so-called expert with such skills and insight - Euthyphro - in this case, and that the latter lacked real understanding I made it clear. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

The concept of Euthyphro sanctity of Plato is essentially the real problem is that God is loved by the Holy Spirit as it is called the love of God and is itself sacred. The main problem that arises is thought to be sacred. The worshipers will have some meaning about God. What I would like to say is that whatever human beliefs are, they will obey because God will obey. Therefore, if you want to examine the opposite side of the spectrum, there are more considerations in terms of sanctity and sanctity. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to so-called experts with such skills and insight - in this case Euthyphro -. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

The concept of Euthyphro sanctity of Plato is essentially the real problem is that God is loved by the Holy Spirit as it is called the love of God and is itself sacred. The main problem that arises is thought to be sacred. The worshipers will have some meaning about God. What I would like to say is that whatever human beliefs are, they will obey because God will obey. Therefore, if you want to examine the opposite side of the spectrum, there are more considerations in terms of sanctity and sanctity. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks about Socrates in the same name of its work and discusses faithful or correct behavior. As it always supports platonic dialogue, Socrates posed a question to so-called experts with such skills and insight - in this case Euthyphro -. While prosecuting his own father to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by Socrates with his solid moral conviction. Socrates believes that in order to take such intense legal action against his father, the person must have abnormal moral clarity. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious.

Traditional and Utilitarian Approach in Euthyphro 's Dilemma In Euthyphro, Plato states even the main cyclical processes between Socrates and Euthyphro, even self - religious prophets and devoutes, and even the essence of faith. God itself. The problems raised in this dialogue have been reinterpreted and extended even in the modern theological framework, so the central problem has just been called "Euthyphro's dilemma" ... This is based on Socrates. . The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. However, Euthyphro's response to the dilemma did not include all theoretical positions on this issue. In the traditional reaction of Judaism and Christianity, the essence of God is sufficient, Euthyphro's dilemma is no problem. Morality itself can be found in the nature of God, because it is his nature, he always acts correctly and orders. This does not apply to either side of the dilemma. For God is not separated from absolute moral standards and is not distinguished, nor is it an issuer of arbitrary orders constituting morality on God's will. Therefore, God's command is a derivative of morality and good in its nature, not morality as a derivative of God's command or will. This position solves many of the dilemma's problems; God maintains integrity, sovereignty and totipotency, objective moral standards also exist in the essence of God.

Traditional and Utilitarian Approach in Euthyphro 's Dilemma In Euthyphro, Plato states even the main cyclical processes between Socrates and Euthyphro, even self - religious prophets and devoutes, and even the essence of faith. God itself. The problems raised in this dialogue have been reinterpreted and extended even in the modern theological framework, so the central problem has just been called "Euthyphro's dilemma" ... This is based on Socrates. . The dilemma of Euthyphro was raised in Plato dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro. In this scene, when Socrates raised a dilemma, Socrates and Euthyphro were talking about the essence of godliness. The dilemma of Euthyphro allows behavior to be a good reaction for God to order actions or to order God to act. If you choose the first one, it means that the command of God must be good: even if he orders someone to exert pain, that pain must be moral . If the latter is chosen, morality no longer depends on God, but it breaks God's command theory. In addition, if God is bound by external law, he will not be sovereign or omnipotent, it will challenge the orthodox concept of God. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa. However, Euthyphro's response to the dilemma did not include all theoretical positions on this issue. In the traditional reaction of Judaism and Christianity, the essence of God is sufficient, Euthyphro's dilemma is no problem. Morality itself can be found in the nature of God, because it is his nature, he always acts correctly and orders. This does not apply to either side of the dilemma. For God is not separated from absolute moral standards and is not distinguished, nor is it an issuer of arbitrary orders constituting morality on God's will. Therefore, God's command is a derivative of morality and good in its nature, not morality as a derivative of God's command or will. This position solves many of the dilemma's problems; God maintains integrity, sovereignty and totipotency, objective moral standards also exist in the essence of God.

About Euthyphro: Notes of Sidney Fein He said that when he was young, Rabbi Israel studied 800 Kabala books. But when he first saw Mezritch 's plaid facing face to face, he knew that he soon did not know anything. I have a mentoring version of Plato's wonderful dialogue translated by W. H. D. Rouse, a university textbook for my daughter on my desk. It costs 4.95 dollars. This is a very good book with convenient footnotes and minimal academic barriers. Editors include six conversations: Ion, Meno, Symposium, Republic, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Saoterte met Yutiflo outside the court of the kingdom governor and did not believe the prosecution of his father's murder by Ytiflo was justified or pious after hearing what Yutiflo was there. He asked Euthyphro to teach him that he is religious and not religious to himself as he can see himself that Euthyphro is a pious act against his father. Then this started a core discussion - a rigorous discussion of faith and rude. Euthyphro tried to explain Socrates' dedication and willingness by first giving his example. He said, "The devout thing is to do what I am doing now to prosecute criminals, such as murder and temple robbery, as your father is your mother or someone else "(5e) Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith)

About Euthyphro: Notes of Sidney Fein He said that when he was young, Rabbi Israel studied 800 Kabala books. But when he first saw Mezritch 's plaid facing face to face, he knew that he soon did not know anything. I have a mentoring version of Plato's wonderful dialogue translated by W. H. D. Rouse, a university textbook for my daughter on my desk. It costs 4.95 dollars. This is a very good book with convenient footnotes and minimal academic barriers. Editors include six conversations: Ion, Meno, Symposium, Republic, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Saoterte met Yutiflo outside the court of the kingdom governor and did not believe the prosecution of his father's murder by Ytiflo was justified or pious after hearing what Yutiflo was there. He asked Euthyphro to teach him that he is religious and not religious to himself as he can see himself that Euthyphro is a pious act against his father. Then this started a core discussion - a rigorous discussion of faith and rude. Euthyphro tried to explain Socrates' dedication and willingness by first giving his example. He said, "The devout thing is to do what I am doing now to prosecute criminals, such as murder and temple robbery, as your father is your mother or someone else "(5e) Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith)

In the initial definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory. And that pointed out that God did not agree, especially on pleasant subjects. This is due to Euthyphro's arrogant Greek mythology concept. Euthyphro is a work by Plato written in the form of a dialogue between a man named Socrates and Euthyphro, a teacher of Plato. The purpose of this work is to examine and define the meaning of godliness and sanctity. It took a couple of weeks before Socrates' famous trial, eventually forced to commit suicide by drinking a Tuga. At the beginning of the dialogue, the two men were waiting for a preliminary hearing at the Alcon Vajirus Court. Euthyphro has reached his father's claim. That worker killed a slave and his father left the worker in the groove while waiting to see what to do. Definition of faith in "Euthyphro" Introduction Plato 's "Euthyphro" introduces Socrates' s exploration method to students of Socrates and introduces at least a godly definition. Before Socrates reached a rational definition, Euthyphro's character withdrew from the conversation, so he never gave a complete understanding of religion. However, there should be some religion. Euthyphro gives Socrates three definitions of faith which makes little sense. Euthyphro is one of the most interesting and important early conversations of Plato. It focuses on this question: What is pious? Euthyphro, a diverse priest, insisted on knowing the answer, but Socrates ceased all definitions he proposed. After five failed attempts to define faith, Euthyphro immediately asked questions without answers. It is 399 BC. Socrates and Euthyphro coincidentally met outside Athens' court, and Socrates will be condemned by corrupted youth and jealousy (or more specifically not trust urban gods and not introduce deceitful gods) I was doing. In his trial, as all Plato readers knew, Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death. This situation affects the discussion. As Socrates said, the question he brought on this occasion was not a trivial abstraction not related to him. As it turns to it, his life will be online

In the initial definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory. And that pointed out that God did not agree, especially on pleasant subjects. This is due to Euthyphro's arrogant Greek mythology concept. Euthyphro is a work by Plato written in the form of a dialogue between a man named Socrates and Euthyphro, a teacher of Plato. The purpose of this work is to examine and define the meaning of godliness and sanctity. It took a couple of weeks before Socrates' famous trial, eventually forced to commit suicide by drinking a Tuga. At the beginning of the dialogue, the two men were waiting for a preliminary hearing at the Alcon Vajirus Court. Euthyphro has reached his father's claim. That worker killed a slave and his father left the worker in the groove while waiting to see what to do. Definition of faith in "Euthyphro" Introduction Plato 's "Euthyphro" introduces Socrates' s exploration method to students of Socrates and introduces at least a godly definition. Before Socrates reached a rational definition, Euthyphro's character withdrew from the conversation, so he never gave a complete understanding of religion. However, there should be some religion. Euthyphro gives Socrates three definitions of faith which makes little sense. Euthyphro is one of the most interesting and important early conversations of Plato. It focuses on this question: What is pious? Euthyphro, a diverse priest, insisted on knowing the answer, but Socrates ceased all definitions he proposed. After five failed attempts to define faith, Euthyphro immediately asked questions without answers. It is 399 BC. Socrates and Euthyphro coincidentally met outside Athens' court, and Socrates will be condemned by corrupted youth and jealousy (or more specifically not trust urban gods and not introduce deceitful gods) I was doing. In his trial, as all Plato readers knew, Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death. This situation affects the discussion. As Socrates said, the question he brought on this occasion was not a trivial abstraction not related to him. As it turns to it, his life will be online

Plato's Socratic Dialogue, Euthyphro is the prototype of the philosophy that Socrates is considered to be interesting in many ways. In it (as in the most classical "Socrates dialogue"), Socrates looks for someone who claims to have some form. Knowledge then continued to show that these experts did not have this knowledge and made them contradictory. With this in mind, I will explain three definitions of the word "devout" Euthyphro gave to Socrates and the definition of Socrates for each of these definitions. In Euthyphro in Plato's five dialogues, Socrates and Euthyphro said "What is godliness?" Euthyphro answered some of the devout definitions of Socrates, but none of the answers is to Socrates It did not seem to satisfy. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One of the attempts by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered as Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still dissatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This led the Euthyphro to say that "devotion is loved by all Gods, all gods hate it, on the contrary, it is pious" (9e, p. 14). In other words, since honor is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates opposed Euthyphro who was convinced again that at this point he made a good statement. Socrates began to oppose the definition proposed by Euthyphro and asked him a question: "Are devout men loved by godliness because of godliness or are they being loved in good faith?" And denied the second of the two alternatives, but Euthyphro could not understand the problem. Socrates agreed to "create more clearly" ("say normally") and then create the most confusing part. Socrates' explanation, you may have noticed that Euthyphro seems a bit surprised that he was unaware that he could not refuse the second option according to his definition. If "godly" is defined as "all beloved" God, in a sense it is "natural", but this is because godly devoutness is loved. But I think you can easily understand why Euthyphro can not expect this to be realized.

Plato's Socratic Dialogue, Euthyphro is the prototype of the philosophy that Socrates is considered to be interesting in many ways. In it (as in the most classical "Socrates dialogue"), Socrates looks for someone who claims to have some form. Knowledge then continued to show that these experts did not have this knowledge and made them contradictory. With this in mind, I will explain three definitions of the word "devout" Euthyphro gave to Socrates and the definition of Socrates for each of these definitions. In Euthyphro in Plato's five dialogues, Socrates and Euthyphro said "What is godliness?" Euthyphro answered some of the devout definitions of Socrates, but none of the answers is to Socrates It did not seem to satisfy. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One of the attempts by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered as Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still dissatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This led the Euthyphro to say that "devotion is loved by all Gods, all gods hate it, on the contrary, it is pious" (9e, p. 14). In other words, since honor is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates opposed Euthyphro who was convinced again that at this point he made a good statement. Socrates began to oppose the definition proposed by Euthyphro and asked him a question: "Are devout men loved by godliness because of godliness or are they being loved in good faith?" And denied the second of the two alternatives, but Euthyphro could not understand the problem. Socrates agreed to "create more clearly" ("say normally") and then create the most confusing part. Socrates' explanation, you may have noticed that Euthyphro seems a bit surprised that he was unaware that he could not refuse the second option according to his definition. If "godly" is defined as "all beloved" God, in a sense it is "natural", but this is because godly devoutness is loved. But I think you can easily understand why Euthyphro can not expect this to be realized.

The theme of theology is the core aspect of everyday life through the history of mankind. What all modern religions have in common is that they provide a set of rules that people should follow to live as a good moral being. This is called sacred Command Theory (DCT) when God (or a group of Gods) instructs believers to follow certain moral standards through careers such as prophets, religious textbooks, or other means I will. Those who accept this theory think that ethical behavior is consistent with God's order. And if we deviate from these orders, I believe that unethical behavior will occur. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa.

The theme of theology is the core aspect of everyday life through the history of mankind. What all modern religions have in common is that they provide a set of rules that people should follow to live as a good moral being. This is called sacred Command Theory (DCT) when God (or a group of Gods) instructs believers to follow certain moral standards through careers such as prophets, religious textbooks, or other means I will. Those who accept this theory think that ethical behavior is consistent with God's order. And if we deviate from these orders, I believe that unethical behavior will occur. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Plato's meditation on God's command theory can be found in his dialogue Euthyphro. The reasons for suffering Euthyphro are as follows. "Is God morally good so that you can order morally good things or do you morally do good to be commanded from God?" The latter is true, justice is arbitrary , If the former is true, morality exists higher than God, God is just a successor to moral knowledge. Several philosophers think this is a faulty predicament. Tenderness is the nature of God, it is inevitably reflected in God's orders. Another reaction promoted in the context of Emmanuel Kant and C. S. Lewis is that the existence of moral objective morality means the existence of God and vice versa.

Bertrand Russell argues that you are in this situation if you judge the difference between good and evil. Whether there is a difference or not, it is due to God's order. If this is due to the command of God, it says that there is no difference between what is right for God and what is wrong, saying that God is good is no longer an important word. Since God's order is good and he is not independent of the fact that he has committed them, you must say that good and evil have any meaning independently of God's command . Let's say that God is good. From the dilemma of Euthyphro, Plato believes that the order of God is never true morality. Sacred orders belong to God or orders come from God. This argument arises from the idea that God is omnipotent and omniscient, and when he finds a failure he will punish us. So the fear of motivating us to obey these God orders is not a proper motivation for some moral acts. Another argument advocated by Plato is that God prescribes such a command of God to be moral and that morality presents the idea that morality exists as a separate entity from God is. Both views show that God's command acts for the benefit of individuals and casts doubt on the motive of moral behavior, so it is not true morality. Essay.com/ Why does Plato think that sacred orders are never true moral order? Do you agree? Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm.

Bertrand Russell argues that you are in this situation if you judge the difference between good and evil. Whether there is a difference or not, it is due to God's order. If this is due to the command of God, it says that there is no difference between what is right for God and what is wrong, saying that God is good is no longer an important word. Since God's order is good and he is not independent of the fact that he has committed them, you must say that good and evil have any meaning independently of God's command . Let's say that God is good. From the dilemma of Euthyphro, Plato believes that the order of God is never true morality. Sacred orders belong to God or orders come from God. This argument arises from the idea that God is omnipotent and omniscient, and when he finds a failure he will punish us. So the fear of motivating us to obey these God orders is not a proper motivation for some moral acts. Another argument advocated by Plato is that God prescribes such a command of God to be moral and that morality presents the idea that morality exists as a separate entity from God is. Both views show that God's command acts for the benefit of individuals and casts doubt on the motive of moral behavior, so it is not true morality. Essay.com/ Why does Plato think that sacred orders are never true moral order? Do you agree? Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm.

Socrates - In Greece, the devoted definition of Athens during the pellicle era (about 400 BC), there is a person named Socrates. He was thought to be a very intelligent person by the Athenians. However, a man of power does not care about himself or his teachings, he insists that he will corrupt Athenian youth and do not believe in Greek gods. Socrates is on the road. On the way to the trial, Socrates met a man named Euthyphro, a professional pastor who is respected by "authorities" (those who wanted to drive Socrates). In Euthyphro in Plato's five dialogues, Socrates and Euthyphro said "What is godliness?" Euthyphro answered some of the devout definitions of Socrates, but none of the answers is to Socrates It did not seem to satisfy. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One of the attempts by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered as Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still dissatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This led the Euthyphro to say that "devotion is loved by all Gods, all gods hate it, on the contrary, it is pious" (9e, p. 14). In other words, because the devotion is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates opposed Euthyphro who was convinced again that at this point he made a good statement. Definition of faith in "Euthyphro" Introduction Plato 's "Euthyphro" introduces Socrates' s exploration method to students of Socrates and introduces at least a godly definition. Before Socrates reached a rational definition, Euthyphro's character withdrew from the conversation, so he never gave a complete understanding of religion. However, there should be some religion. Euthyphro gives Socrates three definitions of faith which makes little sense. Socrates asked Euthyphro to offer him a definition of religion or sanctity. The purpose of establishing a clear definition is to provide a basis for Euthyphro to ask Professor Socrates to answer this question: on the surface, the purpose of the dialogue is to give Socrates a clear meaning of "faith". It can be used to keep disclaimer in pending trial. Socrates is seeking a universal (universal and truthful) definition of "devotion" which measures all behavior and judges whether these actions are pious or not. The definition of "religious" must express the essence of what is defined (religious) and must be defined by genus, species and differences.

Socrates - In Greece, the devoted definition of Athens during the pellicle era (about 400 BC), there is a person named Socrates. He was thought to be a very intelligent person by the Athenians. However, a man of power does not care about himself or his teachings, he insists that he will corrupt Athenian youth and do not believe in Greek gods. Socrates is on the road. On the way to the trial, Socrates met a man named Euthyphro, a professional pastor who is respected by "authorities" (those who wanted to drive Socrates). In Euthyphro in Plato's five dialogues, Socrates and Euthyphro said "What is godliness?" Euthyphro answered some of the devout definitions of Socrates, but none of the answers is to Socrates It did not seem to satisfy. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One of the attempts by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered as Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still dissatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This led the Euthyphro to say that "devotion is loved by all Gods, all gods hate it, on the contrary, it is pious" (9e, p. 14). In other words, because the devotion is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates opposed Euthyphro who was convinced again that at this point he made a good statement. Definition of faith in "Euthyphro" Introduction Plato 's "Euthyphro" introduces Socrates' s exploration method to students of Socrates and introduces at least a godly definition. Before Socrates reached a rational definition, Euthyphro's character withdrew from the conversation, so he never gave a complete understanding of religion. However, there should be some religion. Euthyphro gives Socrates three definitions of faith which makes little sense. Socrates asked Euthyphro to offer him a definition of religion or sanctity. The purpose of establishing a clear definition is to provide a basis for Euthyphro to ask Professor Socrates to answer this question: on the surface, the purpose of the dialogue is to give Socrates a clear meaning of "faith". It can be used to keep disclaimer in pending trial. Socrates is seeking a universal (universal and truthful) definition of "devotion" which measures all behavior and judges whether these actions are pious or not. The definition of "religious" must express the essence of what is defined (religious) and must be defined by genus, species and differences.

As soon as a lot of people get close to the horse, they become cautious about the surrounding environment. These people are nervous and scary because I've heard that their size, appearance, or horse has been injured. Many people are frightened by the size of some horses, they do not want to be around them. Horses are considered dangerous animals, but they help human beings in many ways. For example, they help agricultural work humans can not do on their own, and they have been models of human transport for many years. The general public (and certain parts of the population with horses) may not be able to grasp the seriousness of this opinion difference on horse classification and humanitarian handling. Indeed, horses and their owners benefit from the status of horses' livestock, ranging from federal health and disease programs to property taxes. In order to further advance the vegetarian subjects, animal rights activists welcomed the loss of these benefits, made horse ownership more expensive and problematic, and ultimately secured the welfare of the horse Reduce some of the protective measures to. See FIGS. 13A to 13D. It takes a few lines to make sure that Euthyphro needs to take care of another kind. Because horse breeders take care of horses and dogs and hunters take care. When Socrates asked: "Is pious to bring benefits to God and also to make them better?" Euthyphro recognized his mistake and gave a negative answer. So it is necessary for Socrates to take care of God's devoutness. 13D. Euthyphro replied that pious concern for God is "care of slaves to their master." So Socrates hinted that "This may be a service of God." Therefore, this changed the previous definition, making beliefs a kind of justice related to service to God. It is very close to Socrates in my hometown, but according to his apology, his entire question to ask is to serve the god of Delphi, he thinks that it is good, fair and reverent (apology 35c)

As soon as a lot of people get close to the horse, they become cautious about the surrounding environment. These people are nervous and scary because I've heard that their size, appearance, or horse has been injured. Many people are frightened by the size of some horses, they do not want to be around them. Horses are considered dangerous animals, but they help human beings in many ways. For example, they help agricultural work humans can not do on their own, and they have been models of human transport for many years. The general public (and certain parts of the population with horses) may not be able to grasp the seriousness of this opinion difference on horse classification and humanitarian handling. Indeed, horses and their owners benefit from the status of horses' livestock, ranging from federal health and disease programs to property taxes. In order to further advance the vegetarian subjects, animal rights activists welcomed the loss of these benefits, made horse ownership more expensive and problematic, and ultimately secured the welfare of the horse Reduce some of the protective measures to. See FIGS. 13A to 13D. It takes a few lines to make sure that Euthyphro needs to take care of another kind. Because horse breeders take care of horses and dogs and hunters take care. When Socrates asked: "Is pious to bring benefits to God and also to make them better?" Euthyphro recognized his mistake and gave a negative answer. So it is necessary for Socrates to take care of God's devoutness. 13D. Euthyphro replied that pious concern for God is "care of slaves to their master." So Socrates hinted that "This may be a service of God." Therefore, this changed the previous definition, making beliefs a kind of justice related to service to God. It is very close to Socrates in my hometown, but according to his apology, his entire question to ask is to serve the god of Delphi, he thinks that it is good, fair and reverent (apology 35c)

Plato 's apology Socrates was a 70 - year - old man and opposed to neglecting indictment. He did not succeed in the trial of 399 BC. These claims destroy the young people in Athens. I do not believe the traditional gods the city believes. And finally he believes in other new gods. Plato apologized, Socrates defended these claims. He insists that the opinion of the jury is biased as they may have seen Aristophanes' comedy "clouds". Plato's apology provides insight into the thought and operation of Socrates' outstanding ideas. Everything we know about philosophers is through the work and work of his students and believers (Dean, 2014). An apology is a version of the speech Plato gave when he was tried. This important document shows the skills in Socrates' rhetoric, examinations, and instant speech, which help him refute his accusations. - Plato defines wisdom as the constant pursuit of knowledge in dialogue Plato explains his view of form through analogies of cave fables. In this conversation, Plato shows wisdom and mistakenly creates an analogy that applies to modern Christianity. In Plato's fable, many individuals show the characteristics of people who think he is wise. Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

Plato 's apology Socrates was a 70 - year - old man and opposed to neglecting indictment. He did not succeed in the trial of 399 BC. These claims destroy the young people in Athens. I do not believe the traditional gods the city believes. And finally he believes in other new gods. Plato apologized, Socrates defended these claims. He insists that the opinion of the jury is biased as they may have seen Aristophanes' comedy "clouds". Plato's apology provides insight into the thought and operation of Socrates' outstanding ideas. Everything we know about philosophers is through the work and work of his students and believers (Dean, 2014). An apology is a version of the speech Plato gave when he was tried. This important document shows the skills in Socrates' rhetoric, examinations, and instant speech, which help him refute his accusations. - Plato defines wisdom as the constant pursuit of knowledge in dialogue Plato explains his view of form through analogies of cave fables. In this conversation, Plato shows wisdom and mistakenly creates an analogy that applies to modern Christianity. In Plato's fable, many individuals show the characteristics of people who think he is wise. Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

Socrates met Euthyphro outside the Athens court. Socrates was taken to the court for rude Meletus, and Euthyphro sued his own father for killing the accidentally murdered employee. Socrates scared Euthyphro, if Euthyphro wants to sue his own father for such a suspicious accusation, he must be a great expert in religious affairs. Euthyphro agrees that he knows everything about sacred things. Socrates led him to Yous Philo and urged him to teach something sacred. First, Euthyphro believes that holiness is the persecution of religious criminals. Socrates believes that this definition is inadequate, as there are many sacred acts besides persecuting criminals. He asked Euthyphro to give him a common definition to determine common features of all sacred works. Euthyphro believes that sacredness is the consent of God, Socrates points out that God is often quarreling, so that for a person one may not agree with anyone. The most important attempt by Euthyphro to try to define justice comes from his advice that sacred things are recognized by all gods. Socrates suggested a rather complicated argument that the two could not be equal. Holy ones are recognized as being sacred, so that the holy ones determine what is recognized by God. What God approves in turn determines what God approves. From this reasoning, God 's things can not be the same as those accepted by God. One of them decides what God approves and the other decides God's approval. Euthyphro then suggests that sanctity is a kind of justice, especially a kind of justice that cherishes the gods. Socrates wanted to understand the meaning of Euthyphro by "looking after God". Of course, the gods are omnipotent, we do not need to take care of them or help them in some way. The last recommendation of Euthyphro is that sanctity is a deal with God and we give them a sacrifice and a prayer that they will give us. Our sacrifice does not just help them, they just satisfy it. But Socrates pointed out that saying that holiness is a satisfying god is the same as being recognized by God by Holiness. Instead of trying to find a better definition Euthyphro got angry and lost the doubts of Socrates. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficiently long time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one meaning "the speaker is heading to the store") The summary is understood to be smaller than the original sentence, and the same words may be used . Most commonly, when we provide a summary, we are taking the "point" of the work. We have to decide what is important and what can happen. This is the version of the TV "Clean House" program. What will we protect and throw what? Then we will organize what we keep as it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the art

Socrates met Euthyphro outside the Athens court. Socrates was taken to the court for rude Meletus, and Euthyphro sued his own father for killing the accidentally murdered employee. Socrates scared Euthyphro, if Euthyphro wants to sue his own father for such a suspicious accusation, he must be a great expert in religious affairs. Euthyphro agrees that he knows everything about sacred things. Socrates led him to Yous Philo and urged him to teach something sacred. First, Euthyphro believes that holiness is the persecution of religious criminals. Socrates believes that this definition is inadequate, as there are many sacred acts besides persecuting criminals. He asked Euthyphro to give him a common definition to determine common features of all sacred works. Euthyphro believes that sacredness is the consent of God, Socrates points out that God is often quarreling, so that for a person one may not agree with anyone. The most important attempt by Euthyphro to try to define justice comes from his advice that sacred things are recognized by all gods. Socrates suggested a rather complicated argument that the two could not be equal. Holy ones are recognized as being sacred, so that the holy ones determine what is recognized by God. What God approves in turn determines what God approves. From this reasoning, God 's things can not be the same as those accepted by God. One of them decides what God approves and the other decides God's approval. Euthyphro then suggests that sanctity is a kind of justice, especially a kind of justice that cherishes the gods. Socrates wanted to understand the meaning of Euthyphro by "looking after God". Of course, the gods are omnipotent, we do not need to take care of them or help them in some way. The last recommendation of Euthyphro is that sanctity is a deal with God and we give them a sacrifice and a prayer that they will give us. Our sacrifice does not just help them, they just satisfy it. But Socrates pointed out that saying that holiness is a satisfying god is the same as being recognized by God by Holiness. Instead of trying to find a better definition Euthyphro got angry and lost the doubts of Socrates. Abstracts are generally understood to have sufficiently long time to benefit from abstracts. There is no real summary "I will go to the store" (one meaning "the speaker is heading to the store") The summary is understood to be smaller than the original sentence, and the same words may be used . Most commonly, when we provide a summary, we are taking the "point" of the work. We have to decide what is important and what can happen. This is the version of the TV "Clean House" program. What will we protect and throw what? Then we will organize what we keep as it makes sense It provides two different summaries. The first is a short summary designed to quickly check the plot, the second is a long summary for people who want to know details including small ones (a summary of "oops I have not read"). Side talk and side issues John and Elizabeth talked about Salem's trials and they realized that things were uncontrollable (John still believed that the court would not hang anyone). Elizabeth told John he had to tell him that he was going to the town and Abigail was telling a lie. John 's heir has brought an argument rooted in his jealousy and lack of trust. This assignment is a specific type of summary called a 10 percent summary; that is, the article summary is only 10 percent of the original length. A 10 percent summary is ideal for summarizing nonfictional or descriptive sentences between 500 and 2000 words, reading the length of most paragraphs of the test and reading articles from many magazines and newspapers. ¿ 1/2 read the article immediately, then read the first several paragraphs (10% to 20% of the article). The first few paragraphs usually include the author's position on the topic. Please read the first sentence of the middle paragraph carefully (60% to 80% in the middle of the art

In Plato's Theetetus, Socrates studied the initial definition of knowledge given by the aetetus, ie knowledge is perception. Socrates gave us many examples of both supporting and rebelling knowledge and cognition. The basic requirement of Protagoras is that the truth is based on the recognition of everyone. This means that things seem to be for everyone as they seem to be that person. Socrates explained to us the Protagoras view with a cold wind example. Through Protagoras theory, he said that cold winds are cold and warm winds are warm. This article talks about Socrates asking about the essence of human lifestyle. In this article, I will first outline the importance of understanding Socrates' s good life and self - recognition. Then, it will study the learning theory cultivated by the dialectic of Socrates and the theory of human nature of Socrates. Using Plato's story on Euthyphro, it will demonstrate the practical nature of Socrates' mission to make people think and understand their own mistakes through the destructive process of Socrates dialectic. Finally, it deprives Euthyphro of the details and will show the phased process of Socratic law. The turning point in the history of early philosophical science is an example in which Socrates applied philosophy to human studies, which are human nature, the nature of the political community, and human knowledge itself. The Socratic method described in the Plato dialogue is a dialectical way to eliminate the hypothesis: better assumptions can be found by steadily identifying and eliminating methods leading to contradictions. This is an answer to Sophist's emphasis on rhetoric. The Socratic method searches for common, usually held truths that form beliefs and carefully examines them for determining consistency with other beliefs. Socrates criticized the study of old physics purely as speculative and without self-criticism. Socrates was condemned by his apology as having corrupted the young Athens. He does not believe in the gods of the country's faith, but believes in other new spiritual beings. " 30e

In Plato's Theetetus, Socrates studied the initial definition of knowledge given by the aetetus, ie knowledge is perception. Socrates gave us many examples of both supporting and rebelling knowledge and cognition. The basic requirement of Protagoras is that the truth is based on the recognition of everyone. This means that things seem to be for everyone as they seem to be that person. Socrates explained to us the Protagoras view with a cold wind example. Through Protagoras theory, he said that cold winds are cold and warm winds are warm. This article talks about Socrates asking about the essence of human lifestyle. In this article, I will first outline the importance of understanding Socrates' s good life and self - recognition. Then, it will study the learning theory cultivated by the dialectic of Socrates and the theory of human nature of Socrates. Using Plato's story on Euthyphro, it will demonstrate the practical nature of Socrates' mission to make people think and understand their own mistakes through the destructive process of Socrates dialectic. Finally, it deprives Euthyphro of the details and will show the phased process of Socratic law. The turning point in the history of early philosophical science is an example in which Socrates applied philosophy to human studies, which are human nature, the nature of the political community, and human knowledge itself. The Socratic method described in the Plato dialogue is a dialectical way to eliminate the hypothesis: better assumptions can be found by steadily identifying and eliminating methods leading to contradictions. This is an answer to Sophist's emphasis on rhetoric. The Socratic method searches for common, usually held truths that form beliefs and carefully examines them for determining consistency with other beliefs. Socrates criticized the study of old physics purely as speculative and without self-criticism. Socrates was condemned by his apology as having corrupted the young Athens. He does not believe in the gods of the country's faith, but believes in other new spiritual beings. " 30e

Plato's shame and research summary: In apology, Socrates proved to be the principal teacher of Athens (1), he invited the city to overcome cognitive shame "psychologist Teacher Paul Shane believes that the majority of the learning process starts with shame. (2) Shane defines shame in this way. Shame is a feeling that it is exposed, I want to hide the lower body of a person. It is related to self ideality. People have self concepts, images of people, do not achieve their expectations and achievable goals, there is not a certain thing, I feel embarrassed when it is insufficient. Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Plato's shame and research summary: In apology, Socrates proved to be the principal teacher of Athens (1), he invited the city to overcome cognitive shame "psychologist Teacher Paul Shane believes that the majority of the learning process starts with shame. (2) Shane defines shame in this way. Shame is a feeling that it is exposed, I want to hide the lower body of a person. It is related to self ideality. People have self concepts, images of people, do not achieve their expectations and achievable goals, there is not a certain thing, I feel embarrassed when it is insufficient.

Plato's shame and research summary: In apology, Socrates proved to be the principal teacher of Athens (1), he invited the city to overcome cognitive shame "psychologist Teacher Paul Shane believes that the majority of the learning process starts with shame. (2) Shane defines shame in this way. Shame is a feeling that it is exposed, I want to hide the lower body of a person. It is related to self ideality. People have self concepts, images of people, do not achieve their expectations and achievable goals, there is not a certain thing, I feel embarrassed when it is insufficient. Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Plato's shame and research summary: In apology, Socrates proved to be the principal teacher of Athens (1), he invited the city to overcome cognitive shame "psychologist Teacher Paul Shane believes that the majority of the learning process starts with shame. (2) Shane defines shame in this way. Shame is a feeling that it is exposed, I want to hide the lower body of a person. It is related to self ideality. People have self concepts, images of people, do not achieve their expectations and achievable goals, there is not a certain thing, I feel embarrassed when it is insufficient.

Problem: The first five pages of my script contain more action than audio. Therefore, it exceeds the rule of 1 page per minute. It seems that it is necessary not to talk but a page to explain the behavior. Is this a common problem? Have you thought of this? You can give me some advice, let me feel at ease to overcome this problem, or tell me. Jeffrey Schechter answers as follows. You are right, but the explanation may be slower (or faster) than the conversation, but when you reach 110 pages you need to average all. The best thing you can do is to make the description short and powerful, especially on the valuable first page where the reader forms the impression of his or her first (usually irreversible) script. Two to three short sentences will be sent. There are many blank areas on the page. Also, please make voice active. Jack jumped, he hit a 4 foot wall, he crushed himself in every movement. Please only use the maximum explanation that is necessary to express your thoughts. Do not go to the book (Jack jumps to a rough brick building like a gazelle, he can not grab a wall like a gigantic spider and can not rise above the ground. With a wonderful, superhuman power Pushing yourself beyond the jack wall will put the gymnast into green.BLECH.) The fast-paced scene needs to keep the audience at the end of the seat. There are various speeds. There is an easy dialogue cut, then there is action like tracking. Obviously, a series of actions that are not restricted in conversation or conversation will be much faster, but remember the heart rate monitor. To discuss, let's say that the first cut dialog scene on the heart rate monitor reaches 90 and the sequence of actions ranges from 120 to 150 (these ratios represent our scale measurements and only the spectators are aware It is not the actual heart of a person). My heart beats slightly faster than usual. ) Drama depends on the development of their dialogue. Dialogue is a verbal change between characters. As mentioned in most novels, there is no explanation or comment about actions, so dialogue must convey the entire story. An excellent playwright has opened up a way to clarify individuality, advance actions, and introduce themes by efficiently using dialogue. The conversation is spoken with another character by one character, then they respond. But sometimes, like Shakespeare's Hamlet, the character shows monologue and he or she will speak with him or herself on stage. In many cases, such statements are important because they are considered to be particularly true. When people talk to each other they may cheat, but in general, when they speak, they have no reason to tell the truth. In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks with Socrates and the same name characters of his work and discusses respect or correct behavior. As it always supports platonic dialogue, Socrates has questioned this so-called expert - in this case Euthyphro - with this technology and insight, which reveals that the latter was devoid of real understanding did. While my father was prosecuted to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by his solid moral certainty by Socrates. Socrates believes that one must have abnormal moral clarity in order to take such ferocious legal action against his father. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil

Problem: The first five pages of my script contain more action than audio. Therefore, it exceeds the rule of 1 page per minute. It seems that it is necessary not to talk but a page to explain the behavior. Is this a common problem? Have you thought of this? You can give me some advice, let me feel at ease to overcome this problem, or tell me. Jeffrey Schechter answers as follows. You are right, but the explanation may be slower (or faster) than the conversation, but when you reach 110 pages you need to average all. The best thing you can do is to make the description short and powerful, especially on the valuable first page where the reader forms the impression of his or her first (usually irreversible) script. Two to three short sentences will be sent. There are many blank areas on the page. Also, please make voice active. Jack jumped, he hit a 4 foot wall, he crushed himself in every movement. Please only use the maximum explanation that is necessary to express your thoughts. Do not go to the book (Jack jumps to a rough brick building like a gazelle, he can not grab a wall like a gigantic spider and can not rise above the ground. With a wonderful, superhuman power Pushing yourself beyond the jack wall will put the gymnast into green.BLECH.) The fast-paced scene needs to keep the audience at the end of the seat. There are various speeds. There is an easy dialogue cut, then there is action like tracking. Obviously, a series of actions that are not restricted in conversation or conversation will be much faster, but remember the heart rate monitor. To discuss, let's say that the first cut dialog scene on the heart rate monitor reaches 90 and the sequence of actions ranges from 120 to 150 (these ratios represent our scale measurements and only the spectators are aware It is not the actual heart of a person). My heart beats slightly faster than usual. ) Drama depends on the development of their dialogue. Dialogue is a verbal change between characters. As mentioned in most novels, there is no explanation or comment about actions, so dialogue must convey the entire story. An excellent playwright has opened up a way to clarify individuality, advance actions, and introduce themes by efficiently using dialogue. The conversation is spoken with another character by one character, then they respond. But sometimes, like Shakespeare's Hamlet, the character shows monologue and he or she will speak with him or herself on stage. In many cases, such statements are important because they are considered to be particularly true. When people talk to each other they may cheat, but in general, when they speak, they have no reason to tell the truth. In his dialogue entitled "Euthyphro", Plato talks with Socrates and the same name characters of his work and discusses respect or correct behavior. As it always supports platonic dialogue, Socrates has questioned this so-called expert - in this case Euthyphro - with this technology and insight, which reveals that the latter was devoid of real understanding did. While my father was prosecuted to kill someone, Euthyphro was surprised by his solid moral certainty by Socrates. Socrates believes that one must have abnormal moral clarity in order to take such ferocious legal action against his father. Euthyphro must know the nature of good and evil

Plato 's apology came about when Socrates was tried in front of the Athenian leaders. It is here that Plato tells us that Socrates protects himself. Socrates clarified as much as possible that he was not afraid of giving a death sentence. His speech does not show signs of obvious fear or anxiety, which creates a very bold and courageous front line. Socrates wants to make himself not cause unnecessary suffering, even if he is not afraid of death. Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp Plato's apology said that Socrates is questioning the allegation of defamation of his plaintiff Meletus. Meretas blamed Socrates for the sun and the moon are not gods but only a large number of stones. Socrates 'correspondence was not to clearly deny the assertion of atheism, but to attack Meretus' contradiction. If Plato's story is accurate, the jury can see Socrates offer smoke screen instead of obeying sacred allegations.

Plato 's apology came about when Socrates was tried in front of the Athenian leaders. It is here that Plato tells us that Socrates protects himself. Socrates clarified as much as possible that he was not afraid of giving a death sentence. His speech does not show signs of obvious fear or anxiety, which creates a very bold and courageous front line. Socrates wants to make himself not cause unnecessary suffering, even if he is not afraid of death. Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp Plato's apology said that Socrates is questioning the allegation of defamation of his plaintiff Meletus. Meretas blamed Socrates for the sun and the moon are not gods but only a large number of stones. Socrates 'correspondence was not to clearly deny the assertion of atheism, but to attack Meretus' contradiction. If Plato's story is accurate, the jury can see Socrates offer smoke screen instead of obeying sacred allegations.

"Do people hurt it and benefit the whole world? Is this the opposite of the truth?" (786) He said that the world will be better if everyone is friendly except for people It was. Then he asked if it would be better to live between good and evil. Meretus agrees that it lives in goodness (786). Socrates asked his child of corruption, of course Mertas's intentional or unintentional (787) say this is intentional. Socrates that he refuses to argue (787) that he is accidentally damaged by a child, or even corrosion at all. Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death (Xenophone tells us that he wants to get such a result, Plato confirms this with his apology to write a trial It seems to be. The last day of Socrates in Plato 's Records Eutepron, Apology, Critong and Paydon, the dialogue ", the last day of his death, as Plato said, friends are surrounded by Athens prison (by drinking Hemlock) This is the end of our friends, I think, this is the wisest, most elegant person, and the best person I know "(Phaedo, 118) Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp

"Do people hurt it and benefit the whole world? Is this the opposite of the truth?" (786) He said that the world will be better if everyone is friendly except for people It was. Then he asked if it would be better to live between good and evil. Meretus agrees that it lives in goodness (786). Socrates asked his child of corruption, of course Mertas's intentional or unintentional (787) say this is intentional. Socrates that he refuses to argue (787) that he is accidentally damaged by a child, or even corrosion at all. Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death (Xenophone tells us that he wants to get such a result, Plato confirms this with his apology to write a trial It seems to be. The last day of Socrates in Plato 's Records Eutepron, Apology, Critong and Paydon, the dialogue ", the last day of his death, as Plato said, friends are surrounded by Athens prison (by drinking Hemlock) This is the end of our friends, I think, this is the wisest, most elegant person, and the best person I know "(Phaedo, 118) Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp

Socrates - The protagonist of Euthyphro (and all other Plato dialogues). Socrates does not have many material wealth, it seems to be a very simple person without speaking in a simple and conversational way. However, this apparent bluntness is only a part of the satirical features of Socrates' method. Through his own ignorance, he will talk about people who claim to be experts, usually ethical issues. By asking simple questions Socrates will gradually show that his dialogue is in fact very confused and knows nothing about claiming that he is an expert. Socrates believes that pursuing wisdom and guidance to others through dialogue and exploration is the greatest goal of life. His most famous word is that "uncensored life is not worth living." He did not advance any of his own theory, and of course many of the doctrines that appeared in the dialogue were inventions of Plato. In an early conversation like Euthyphro, Plato showed us Socrates, who did not know Plato's philosophy; to the contrary who argued that he had positive knowledge, he was more like a foil . Euthyphro - a conversationist and a dialogueist with his same name characters. Euthyphro is an orthodox and doctrinal religious person who believes that he knows everything about sacredness. He often prophesies to others and trials his father with suspicious murder. We do not know whether Euthyphro is a historical figure or whether he is a fictitious invention of Plato. Meletus - responsible for the accusation of Socrates. He led him to justice and executed him. Little is known about Meletus, and in every respect, he seems rather rather insidious. His explanation in Plato, whether apologized or Euthyphro, is far from compassion; shame on Socrates' s "apology" made him feel embarrassed. He actually did not appear in Euthyphro, but he was mentioned many times. Often literary works with poor expression are criticized as having "stock letters", "flat characters", "characters without dimensions", "characters not drawn well". The incredible character of the book is one of the most severe criticisms it made in the modern era. Therefore, the authors use characterization to 'enrich' their roles, show the motivation of the characters, and sympathize the readers with the characters. Cathy caught a piece of meat and bit it with her incisors. Samuel has never seen anyone chew. As she swallowed her little tongue shook around her lips. Samuel's idea, "I could not find out a few things - what it is, something did not work," repeated the table. My mantra is like this. It ends with a letter. Please find the story between them. According to the old adage, this is their story, so the character should be the same as Plot. By immersing in the lives of our character and determining their interrelationships and the nature of each narrative function you can create a character map along the top line to inform the story structure. As a bonus: I collected over the years to help you further explore the role of discovering their unique personality and sound, including questionnaires, biographies, monologues, interviews, sit-in, prototypes of secondary roles etc. Here is a series of character development tools. wait In addition to all the other quotations, one of the main ways in which the character of Malvolio evolves is through a monologue. A monologue is a long speech of a character. Most lines of a typical game are conversations, and the characters are talking with each other. In monologue, the character announces an extended speech by himself. Malvolio has several monologs during the play, and they all help all of him develop his own roles and roles. His first monologue in the second act, when he found a fraudulent letter that is said to have been written by Olivia, he acknowledged her love, and her ridiculous clothes to win her advantageously I asked him to wear it. With this monologue he began to read the letter and imagined that his life was like Olivia's husband:

Socrates - The protagonist of Euthyphro (and all other Plato dialogues). Socrates does not have many material wealth, it seems to be a very simple person without speaking in a simple and conversational way. However, this apparent bluntness is only a part of the satirical features of Socrates' method. Through his own ignorance, he will talk about people who claim to be experts, usually ethical issues. By asking simple questions Socrates will gradually show that his dialogue is in fact very confused and knows nothing about claiming that he is an expert. Socrates believes that pursuing wisdom and guidance to others through dialogue and exploration is the greatest goal of life. His most famous word is that "uncensored life is not worth living." He did not advance any of his own theory, and of course many of the doctrines that appeared in the dialogue were inventions of Plato. In an early conversation like Euthyphro, Plato showed us Socrates, who did not know Plato's philosophy; to the contrary who argued that he had positive knowledge, he was more like a foil . Euthyphro - a conversationist and a dialogueist with his same name characters. Euthyphro is an orthodox and doctrinal religious person who believes that he knows everything about sacredness. He often prophesies to others and trials his father with suspicious murder. We do not know whether Euthyphro is a historical figure or whether he is a fictitious invention of Plato. Meletus - responsible for the accusation of Socrates. He led him to justice and executed him. Little is known about Meletus, and in every respect, he seems rather rather insidious. His explanation in Plato, whether apologized or Euthyphro, is far from compassion; shame on Socrates' s "apology" made him feel embarrassed. He actually did not appear in Euthyphro, but he was mentioned many times. Often literary works with poor expression are criticized as having "stock letters", "flat characters", "characters without dimensions", "characters not drawn well". The incredible character of the book is one of the most severe criticisms it made in the modern era. Therefore, the authors use characterization to 'enrich' their roles, show the motivation of the characters, and sympathize the readers with the characters. Cathy caught a piece of meat and bit it with her incisors. Samuel has never seen anyone chew. As she swallowed her little tongue shook around her lips. Samuel's idea, "I could not find out a few things - what it is, something did not work," repeated the table. My mantra is like this. It ends with a letter. Please find the story between them. According to the old adage, this is their story, so the character should be the same as Plot. By immersing in the lives of our character and determining their interrelationships and the nature of each narrative function you can create a character map along the top line to inform the story structure. As a bonus: I collected over the years to help you further explore the role of discovering their unique personality and sound, including questionnaires, biographies, monologues, interviews, sit-in, prototypes of secondary roles etc. Here is a series of character development tools. wait In addition to all the other quotations, one of the main ways in which the character of Malvolio evolves is through a monologue. A monologue is a long speech of a character. Most lines of a typical game are conversations, and the characters are talking with each other. In monologue, the character announces an extended speech by himself. Malvolio has several monologs during the play, and they all help all of him develop his own roles and roles. His first monologue in the second act, when he found a fraudulent letter that is said to have been written by Olivia, he acknowledged her love, and her ridiculous clothes to win her advantageously I asked him to wear it. With this monologue he began to read the letter and imagined that his life was like Olivia's husband:

Live: At the Perry-Castañeda library, Socrates discovered me in a sudden and mysterious light when writing the reprint of the Republic of Plato. Is me. Socrates, why am I here? Socrates Your parents are doing this. I am afraid not to obey your intentions of the question. Is me. At this university, that is it. What are you doing here? Are there any moral or ethical reasons for undergraduate education? What is the purpose of my education? Socrates I do not think I will get enough answers. Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy.

Live: At the Perry-Castañeda library, Socrates discovered me in a sudden and mysterious light when writing the reprint of the Republic of Plato. Is me. Socrates, why am I here? Socrates Your parents are doing this. I am afraid not to obey your intentions of the question. Is me. At this university, that is it. What are you doing here? Are there any moral or ethical reasons for undergraduate education? What is the purpose of my education? Socrates I do not think I will get enough answers. Euthyphro is a dialogue between Plato and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both people in the conversation were involved in the lawsuit and the dialogue was full of arguments about Euthyphro's lawsuit. Here, as Socrates explained, I would like to talk about Euthyphro's case, godly behavior, and the characteristics of Daedalus. The Socrates and Utofro trials were explained in dialogue. Not to mention the case of Socrates, it is that Meretas blames the corrupted youth and is doing experiments that do not like the gods. Socrates involved his own affair, and he said he wanted to use the Euthyphro argument to help him make a lawsuit against Meletus. Euthyphro is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that condemned his older father as senior. His father killed his servant and threw his servant into the groove. Euthyphro discovered his father's behavior and asked him to go over him and appeal him. Socrates discussed how Euthyphro's behavior is religious or pious. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy.

The first two commandments God gave to Moses in Exodus became adultery for oppression. Nothing is a god in the world, so everyone is a creature. But when people are depressed, they not only respect their neighbors, they also commit a crime peculiar to God and try to commit infidelity. Therefore, if justice is established by establishing a right relationship with others, Israel 's bondage to Egypt and the African - Americans withstanding America in the national inequality preserve the sacred relationship with God by humans I can not forgive to do. From this revelation, Adam, the first person, knows that God's commandments have been defeated and that he has created sacredness and justice, not only himself but also sacredness and justice for all humanity. Adam and Eve committed a personal crime, but this crime has an effect on the human nature spreading in a corrupted state - this is a crime to spread the deprived human being, that is to spread the deprived human nature . Holy - Holy is part of justice? "(12d) And to complete this idea: in a place that is not necessarily holy and justice.Oh, of course, there is justice, then sanctification.Of course all the justice problems are simply what you do In the face, lawsuit against his father is a matter of justice and it may be a legal problem.When answers are given to you 13 In fact, there is an explanation of the determination that Euthyphro is not holy, not just considering his own case from justice point of view. Let's return to the beginning of the dialogue Basilius Let's meet Euthyphro about the steps of the 'consa consular consulate (an open colored building like an independent porch), who is this guy? Why is Euthyphro here? Think of the legal system as a necessary attribute of who God is who can not imagine the ultimate reality of justice, or the ideal of higher justice. Punishment like hell is a necessary extension of "God's justice". But most of these people will say that God does not like this because God rather shows mercy. In other words, God does not actually like his attributes, but he is somewhat bound by his own nature, so he must obey the legal system anyway.

The first two commandments God gave to Moses in Exodus became adultery for oppression. Nothing is a god in the world, so everyone is a creature. But when people are depressed, they not only respect their neighbors, they also commit a crime peculiar to God and try to commit infidelity. Therefore, if justice is established by establishing a right relationship with others, Israel 's bondage to Egypt and the African - Americans withstanding America in the national inequality preserve the sacred relationship with God by humans I can not forgive to do. From this revelation, Adam, the first person, knows that God's commandments have been defeated and that he has created sacredness and justice, not only himself but also sacredness and justice for all humanity. Adam and Eve committed a personal crime, but this crime has an effect on the human nature spreading in a corrupted state - this is a crime to spread the deprived human being, that is to spread the deprived human nature . Holy - Holy is part of justice? "(12d) And to complete this idea: in a place that is not necessarily holy and justice.Oh, of course, there is justice, then sanctification.Of course all the justice problems are simply what you do In the face, lawsuit against his father is a matter of justice and it may be a legal problem.When answers are given to you 13 In fact, there is an explanation of the determination that Euthyphro is not holy, not just considering his own case from justice point of view. Let's return to the beginning of the dialogue Basilius Let's meet Euthyphro about the steps of the 'consa consular consulate (an open colored building like an independent porch), who is this guy? Why is Euthyphro here? Think of the legal system as a necessary attribute of who God is who can not imagine the ultimate reality of justice, or the ideal of higher justice. Punishment like hell is a necessary extension of "God's justice". But most of these people will say that God does not like this because God rather shows mercy. In other words, God does not actually like his attributes, but he is somewhat bound by his own nature, so he must obey the legal system anyway.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In my opinion, I think that Socrates respects the ability to pursue the laws and justice of the country, but when the concept of his own morality or justice conflicts with the state they will gladly question ing. With this in mind, I think that Socrates will take the same action as Antigone of Sophocles of Antigone. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In my opinion, I think that Socrates respects the ability to pursue the laws and justice of the country, but when the concept of his own morality or justice conflicts with the state they will gladly question ing. With this in mind, I think that Socrates will take the same action as Antigone of Sophocles of Antigone. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

Sacred command theory is an ethical theory related to God, and how his commandmans lead to human morality. The opposition to this theory involves opposition to the nature and existence of God, or to the nature of his personality and order. For the purpose of this article, I will introduce the theory of God's command, introduce obvious objections in Genesis 22, propose and explain the replacement of God's command theory, ie God's theory of will, Explain why this theory avoids the opposition, point of view Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. In any case, the theory of sacred orders of Yuanlun provides the material for this discussion. The revival of the moral obligation of the Sacred Command Theory (DCT) was mainly from the work of Philip Quinn (1979/1978) and Robert Adams (1999). Adams' DCT version is particularly influential and ideally suited to protect moral knowledge by providing God's knowledge. Adams' DCT version is an explanation of moral obligations, which is a more general 'autonomous' ethical view that tries to deal with other moral attributes (eg good) as being dependent on God's will It must be distinguished. Adams avoided the standard 'Euthyphro' objection by limiting theory to duty, as described below. And that claimed that the command view of God reduced ethics to arbitrariness. Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. Motivation of this sacred command theory can say that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality.

Sacred command theory is an ethical theory related to God, and how his commandmans lead to human morality. The opposition to this theory involves opposition to the nature and existence of God, or to the nature of his personality and order. For the purpose of this article, I will introduce the theory of God's command, introduce obvious objections in Genesis 22, propose and explain the replacement of God's command theory, ie God's theory of will, Explain why this theory avoids the opposition, point of view Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. In any case, the theory of sacred orders of Yuanlun provides the material for this discussion. The revival of the moral obligation of the Sacred Command Theory (DCT) was mainly from the work of Philip Quinn (1979/1978) and Robert Adams (1999). Adams' DCT version is particularly influential and ideally suited to protect moral knowledge by providing God's knowledge. Adams' DCT version is an explanation of moral obligations, which is a more general 'autonomous' ethical view that tries to deal with other moral attributes (eg good) as being dependent on God's will It must be distinguished. Adams avoided the standard 'Euthyphro' objection by limiting theory to duty, as described below. And that claimed that the command view of God reduced ethics to arbitrariness. Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. Motivation of this sacred command theory can say that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality.

In Protagora, the traditional argument that Socrates tried to prove the moral weakness of Protagoras is not consistent. He believes that Accraia, moral weakness is mere ignorance. On line 353a 10, Socrates started a trip with Protagoras. Meanwhile, he asked him if they did bad things even if they knew it, they were overcome by happiness. Very bad Socrates, we use the example of a sexual relationship with food and drink in order to show that the people share the joy of hedonism when you know that they might encounter bad result. Tuesday, March 6: Let's finish the discussion about Plato Protagoras before entering Euthyphro. I will explore the (controversial) phenomenon of Accraia. You can see if the description about intellectual virtue can withstand the various theoretical pressures inspired by Accraia. Official paper documents will appear soon. I can write some interesting content about Plato's Euthyphro. Thursday, March 1: I will introduce Extractos. We may end the Laches argument. Then we will quickly infiltrate Plato's Protagoras. Is that a rational argument for 'unity of virtue'? How do intellectuals explain moral virtues? Is Akrasia the real phenomenon in our world? How do you feel to go play with "mature and ready" Alcibiades? Euthyphro will appear soon Plato (427-347 BC): Proto is the protagonist of the Plato dialogue. The doctrines of Pratolas and Protagoras were widely discussed in Plato's Theaetetus. But Plato's dialogue is a mixture of historical stories and art permissions, as was the manga of the day. In addition, by the time Plato was very young, Protagoras is dead and Plato may rely on incomplete reliable preliminary evidence to understand Protagora. Diogenes Laertius (3rd century BC): Diogenes' life of philosophers may be the most comprehensive source of many works and biographies of early Greek philosophers. Unfortunately, his work was written over 600 years after the death of Protagoras, it is a noncritical editorial of materials from various sources, some are reliable, others are not There is also. Garbled characters As many contemporary thinkers have said, Plato attributes relativism to Protagora and uses his predecessor's teachings as a foil to his commitment to objectivity and reality and value transcendence. Plato believes that Protagoras is the earliest form of John Wild that is classified as phenomenology. This is an assertion that for someone, or what appears is the truth or the truth for that person. But as Plato's Theaetetus states, Protagora's view allows certain ideas to be caused by physical or mental discomfort. He emphasized that all views are equally correct, and perhaps equally respected, but they are certainly not equally important. One aspect may be useful and beneficial to the owning owner, but another perspective may be harmful. Therefore, Protagoras believes that there is a trick to teach the students how to tell them, that is, to teach "virtue".

In Protagora, the traditional argument that Socrates tried to prove the moral weakness of Protagoras is not consistent. He believes that Accraia, moral weakness is mere ignorance. On line 353a 10, Socrates started a trip with Protagoras. Meanwhile, he asked him if they did bad things even if they knew it, they were overcome by happiness. Very bad Socrates, we use the example of a sexual relationship with food and drink in order to show that the people share the joy of hedonism when you know that they might encounter bad result. Tuesday, March 6: Let's finish the discussion about Plato Protagoras before entering Euthyphro. I will explore the (controversial) phenomenon of Accraia. You can see if the description about intellectual virtue can withstand the various theoretical pressures inspired by Accraia. Official paper documents will appear soon. I can write some interesting content about Plato's Euthyphro. Thursday, March 1: I will introduce Extractos. We may end the Laches argument. Then we will quickly infiltrate Plato's Protagoras. Is that a rational argument for 'unity of virtue'? How do intellectuals explain moral virtues? Is Akrasia the real phenomenon in our world? How do you feel to go play with "mature and ready" Alcibiades? Euthyphro will appear soon Plato (427-347 BC): Proto is the protagonist of the Plato dialogue. The doctrines of Pratolas and Protagoras were widely discussed in Plato's Theaetetus. But Plato's dialogue is a mixture of historical stories and art permissions, as was the manga of the day. In addition, by the time Plato was very young, Protagoras is dead and Plato may rely on incomplete reliable preliminary evidence to understand Protagora. Diogenes Laertius (3rd century BC): Diogenes' life of philosophers may be the most comprehensive source of many works and biographies of early Greek philosophers. Unfortunately, his work was written over 600 years after the death of Protagoras, it is a noncritical editorial of materials from various sources, some are reliable, others are not There is also. Garbled characters As many contemporary thinkers have said, Plato attributes relativism to Protagora and uses his predecessor's teachings as a foil to his commitment to objectivity and reality and value transcendence. Plato believes that Protagoras is the earliest form of John Wild that is classified as phenomenology. This is an assertion that for someone, or what appears is the truth or the truth for that person. But as Plato's Theaetetus states, Protagora's view allows certain ideas to be caused by physical or mental discomfort. He emphasized that all views are equally correct, and perhaps equally respected, but they are certainly not equally important. One aspect may be useful and beneficial to the owning owner, but another perspective may be harmful. Therefore, Protagoras believes that there is a trick to teach the students how to tell them, that is, to teach "virtue".

Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. The Socrates investigation method questioned his beliefs on their beliefs and often led them to a state of confusion or Plato called "melancholy". Meno has examples of many Socratic techniques, also written by Plato. The apology was written by Plato 's Socrates trial, and at the age of seventy - seven, Socrates was condemned to have defeated the young Athenian people. Plato's story includes three speech Socrates made during the trial. Socrates talked with the Athenians before his jury in 399 BC and acknowledged that he had forgotten who he was himself. The trial began with the prosecutor sued the accused in front of the jury of Athens. In this trial, Meretas believed that Socrates committed a crime committed by the youth of Athens and made rude. Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand his quest and the Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. Approach to the quest of Socrates caused the audience to question their beliefs and often led to the state of confusion or the state of Plato called "depression". Meno has many examples of Socratic method written by Plato. . Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. The Socrates investigation method questioned his beliefs on their beliefs and often led them to a state of confusion or Plato called "melancholy". Meno has examples of many Socratic techniques, also written by Plato. The apology was written by Plato 's Socrates trial, and at the age of seventy - seven, Socrates was condemned to have defeated the young Athenian people. Plato's story includes three speech Socrates made during the trial. Socrates talked with the Athenians before his jury in 399 BC and acknowledged that he had forgotten who he was himself. The trial began with the prosecutor sued the accused in front of the jury of Athens. In this trial, Meretas believed that Socrates committed a crime committed by the youth of Athens and made rude. Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand his quest and the Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. Approach to the quest of Socrates caused the audience to question their beliefs and often led to the state of confusion or the state of Plato called "depression". Meno has many examples of Socratic method written by Plato. . Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. The method of Socrates is very similar to the scientific method; the Socrates method seems to be less effective than the scientific method. 23903154, 1 October, Socrates who critically judges Socrates hired his Elenchus to investigate the concept of justice and the duty of justice of men in criticism of dialogue. In the dialogue context, Socrates was sentenced to death, but Creo brought hope and means to escape Socrates from prison. When Socrates claims that they should check whether he should escape, the central problem is whether it is unfair for it to violate the law. The last answer of Socrates is Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - I was convicted for life. Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, even if it is unfair or evil, as long as it is actually a valid regulation of the existing legal system in fact. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read.

Mr. Plato's apology was entitled "Mr. Plato's colleague resumed the trial" and "Sorry", Mr. Socrates insisted that he wanted to do good only for defense. I believe that Socrates is not guilty of his claim, but he despised the court and showed his thought that led to his death. In his defense, Socrates claims that he is innocent, again and again, not wise "I know because it is small or big, I do not have wisdom ... .... "In his other speech in the middle, he seemed to be doing the opposite as if he was better than anyone, later he even said" If the world decided Socrates, Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Plato 's apology apology is that Socrates preserved his life and vision in the same jury. They condemned his death and distorted young people in Athens for "atheism". Saying, I advise anyone who encounters my attitude and I will not stop teaching practice and philosophy "persuading him: Socrates' correspondence My friends, why you are great and powerful Very concerned about money and honor and reputation in citizens of Athens? Do you not notice whether you are considering this about the wisest city, the greatest improvement of wisdom and truth and soul? Are not you ashamed of this? " Plato 's apology for Socrates includes a violent statement about the relationship between Socrates and Athens citizens and citizens. It was surprising that Socrates did not keep the essence and method of his teaching, as it was being tried for rotting youth. Instead, he just denied that he was a teacher. Many scholars believe that Plato distinguished him from sophisticated people primarily when Socrates denied that he was a teacher. In this article, I think, from the perspective of the historical life of educational change Socrates and Plato, Socrates refuses the difference between Socrates and sophistry more than what was shown much more complicated. As an orator, sophist, natural philosopher, Socrates, probably philosopher: Socrates has Athenian there are various kinds. I believed that I failed to recognize the new Athens in the 5th century education. Why did Socrates deny that he was a teacher? Positioning of Socrates in traditional education of new educators and apologetics of Plato's Socrates

Mr. Plato's apology was entitled "Mr. Plato's colleague resumed the trial" and "Sorry", Mr. Socrates insisted that he wanted to do good only for defense. I believe that Socrates is not guilty of his claim, but he despised the court and showed his thought that led to his death. In his defense, Socrates claims that he is innocent, again and again, not wise "I know because it is small or big, I do not have wisdom ... .... "In his other speech in the middle, he seemed to be doing the opposite as if he was better than anyone, later he even said" If the world decided Socrates, Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Plato 's apology apology is that Socrates preserved his life and vision in the same jury. They condemned his death and distorted young people in Athens for "atheism". Saying, I advise anyone who encounters my attitude and I will not stop teaching practice and philosophy "persuading him: Socrates' correspondence My friends, why you are great and powerful Very concerned about money and honor and reputation in citizens of Athens? Do you not notice whether you are considering this about the wisest city, the greatest improvement of wisdom and truth and soul? Are not you ashamed of this? " Plato 's apology for Socrates includes a violent statement about the relationship between Socrates and Athens citizens and citizens. It was surprising that Socrates did not keep the essence and method of his teaching, as it was being tried for rotting youth. Instead, he just denied that he was a teacher. Many scholars believe that Plato distinguished him from sophisticated people primarily when Socrates denied that he was a teacher. In this article, I think, from the perspective of the historical life of educational change Socrates and Plato, Socrates refuses the difference between Socrates and sophistry more than what was shown much more complicated. As an orator, sophist, natural philosopher, Socrates, probably philosopher: Socrates has Athenian there are various kinds. I believed that I failed to recognize the new Athens in the 5th century education. Why did Socrates deny that he was a teacher? Positioning of Socrates in traditional education of new educators and apologetics of Plato's Socrates

Plato Plato 's apologies apology The cost to him, a story about Socrates' trial, he maintained his innocence throughout the process. At the beginning of the trial, Socrates seems to be challenging expenses such as breakage of young people, the challenge not only introduces the inspirational gods country, introduces a new inspired focus, introduces new religious focus, but also himself I disregarded the meaning and suggested he would not be, I am trying to counter his actions in the court. His earlier dialogue, Plato apology, which is generally considered to be on "Socrates' trial" is a fairly reliable explanation. Plato is in the audience. A total of 511 people participated in the judges. After trial, Plato may consult with some of them to restore his memory. Either way, there you can check Plato memory There are too many people out there, so we reasonably think that he will make everything. That is why it is considered reliable. Aristotle is a student at Plato University in Plato. He worked there for 20 years. At first it was with the student, then with the teacher. After that Aristotle established her own school called a university. Aristotle was an excellent genius who invented formal logic, biology etc. James Christian, as he said and said, "The heart of the encyclopedia." American philosopher George Santayana said Aristotle said for him that "everything is an ideal natural result All have an ideal foundation. Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Apologies are Plato's recall and interpretation of the Soprates trial (399 BC). In this conversation, Socrates explains who he is and the life he is leading. The Greek word "apologia" means "interpretation" and not to be confused with "apologies" or "regret". The following is an overview of "discussions" and logos that Socrates uses for defense. Hypertext processing of this conversation is also available. The first sentence determines the tone and direction of the whole dialog. When Socrates told the Athenian, he said that he almost forgot who he was. His whistle 's remark made him to reach this point. Therefore, the dialogue will be a kind of "memory" of Socrates that he is. In other words, the apology is the answer of Socrates to this question: "Who is the curse?"

Plato Plato 's apologies apology The cost to him, a story about Socrates' trial, he maintained his innocence throughout the process. At the beginning of the trial, Socrates seems to be challenging expenses such as breakage of young people, the challenge not only introduces the inspirational gods country, introduces a new inspired focus, introduces new religious focus, but also himself I disregarded the meaning and suggested he would not be, I am trying to counter his actions in the court. His earlier dialogue, Plato apology, which is generally considered to be on "Socrates' trial" is a fairly reliable explanation. Plato is in the audience. A total of 511 people participated in the judges. After trial, Plato may consult with some of them to restore his memory. Either way, there you can check Plato memory There are too many people out there, so we reasonably think that he will make everything. That is why it is considered reliable. Aristotle is a student at Plato University in Plato. He worked there for 20 years. At first it was with the student, then with the teacher. After that Aristotle established her own school called a university. Aristotle was an excellent genius who invented formal logic, biology etc. James Christian, as he said and said, "The heart of the encyclopedia." American philosopher George Santayana said Aristotle said for him that "everything is an ideal natural result All have an ideal foundation. Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Apologies are Plato's recall and interpretation of the Soprates trial (399 BC). In this conversation, Socrates explains who he is and the life he is leading. The Greek word "apologia" means "interpretation" and not to be confused with "apologies" or "regret". The following is an overview of "discussions" and logos that Socrates uses for defense. Hypertext processing of this conversation is also available. The first sentence determines the tone and direction of the whole dialog. When Socrates told the Athenian, he said that he almost forgot who he was. His whistle 's remark made him to reach this point. Therefore, the dialogue will be a kind of "memory" of Socrates that he is. In other words, the apology is the answer of Socrates to this question: "Who is the curse?"

Takayuki is an indivisible part of Chinese culture, therefore it is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of marital faith. Buddism and Taoism also support filial piety with some of those texts, but there is a monky system that prevents monks and nuns from becoming faithful The term filial piety represents the extreme respect that Chinese children should show to their parents. This includes a variety of things including caring for parents, correct burrying after death, expressing respect for family members, transporting by male heirs. These things are not what the children need. Instead, they are just a few of the rules that Confucius disciples consider enough to be included in the Apocalypse. The concept of filial piety is also shown in other Confucian texts like "books and punishments". This article is technically popular religious text, not Confucian text, but it highlights many Confucian ideals such as filial piety. It describes kind and kind people who pursue eternal life, showing "loyalty to the ruler, loyalty to the parents, true friendship to the brothers" (143). Instead, the evil people "insult the rulers and their parents behind" (143). According to this article, you will not be a kind and kind person if you do not respect your parents. Adding brothers worship to this popular religious work also helps to show how wide filial piety in China is. It has received strong support and promotion from Confucianism, but filial piety is not limited to Confucianism - it is part of Chinese culture. Buddhist worship is also mentioned in Buddhist texts. In Mangalasutta, parents' love is said to never be compensated even if one person does not knock down 100 or one parent on the shoulder. In Confucian and Buddhist ethics, marriage faith (Chinese: marriage faith, xiào) is a virtue respecting parents, elder, ancestors. Confucian marital faith was believed to have been written during the Qin and Han Dynasty era and was historically an authoritative source of the Confucian marriage faith principle. This book is a dialogue on how to build a good society with Confucius principle between Confucius and his student Zengzi. Takayuki is the core of Confucian 's role ethics Faith belief in Chinese religion is an integral part of Chinese culture and therefore is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of marital faith. Buddhism and Taoism also suggest that some of these texts support filial piety, but there is a monastery system to ensure that monks and nuns do not become children. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro first defines parole as what he is doing now, this is merely an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent, especially with respect to pleasant subjects. Western audience During the past several centuries, Chinese people have been completely influenced by Confucianism, especially filial piety. According to Confucius 'Apocalypse, the term' filial piety 'is defined as a series of values ​​emphasizing only parents' filial piety (natural respect for children) and special responsibilities to the elder. (1: 2, Confucian thesis) Basically, filial piety is deeply rooted in traditional Chinese culture. It has also become a fixed foundation

Introduction and Background: For Dear Honor, it should be a complex concept with different meaning and value in different time periods and regions. Looking back on the history of filial piety, Confucianism in China is the most representative pillar, respecting parents and ancestors. However, the filial piety is not unique to the Chinese. East Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea have similar concepts and are strongly influenced by Chinese culture. In some religions, Christianity and Buddhism introduced some concepts of marital faith. However, the content of filial piety is to respect the elderly and means having a close relationship with their families ... See more The Japanese government introduced the Gold Plan in 1989. This is now part of nursing care insurance system nationwide. The measures specially designed for social support, plans to increase the social participation of the elderly in the community are called the purpose of life policy and do not include the special needs of elderly people. Our culture of cultural interaction and change of value has made a dramatic change in family relations. As more and more people choose alternative lives, the tradition of filial piety will soon disappear. Our society, with emphasis on privacy and personal space, is turning to a more non-traditional world. In the days when parents and children played an unequal role in life and had different economic and social status, people no longer live. Not only do the elderly want to live independently, the young people demand the rise of privacy and individualism. The gap between the elderly and the young generation is increasing. Even though they live together, the elders do not seem to avoid loneliness. I think that an old man is willing to spend his own time, please do not worry about housework at his son 's house. My sons can share their burden and help them to feed the elders. From time to time, an independent life can remind our son to be more intimate and respectful. for In Confucian and Buddhist ethics, marriage faith (Chinese: marriage faith, xiào) is a virtue respecting parents, elder, ancestors. Confucian marital faith was believed to have been written during the Qin and Han Dynasty era and was historically an authoritative source of the Confucian marriage faith principle. This book is a dialogue on how to build a good society with Confucius principle between Confucius and his student Zengzi. Takayuki is the core of Confucian 's role ethics Because marriage faith has been admired for the greatest morality of China for centuries, Chinese filial piety is a characteristic of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of China's morality and "every succeeding study of enlightenment exists". The Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith belief in Chinese religion is an integral part of Chinese culture and therefore is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of marital faith. Buddhism and Taoism also suggest that some of these texts support filial piety, but there is a monastery system to ensure that monks and nuns do not become children. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro first defines parole as what he is doing now, this is merely an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were n

In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. Exploring this contradiction between Socrates, faithful citizen, and Socratic philosopher will help to position Plato's argument. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

In order to understand the sacred command theory, we must first understand the nature and morality of God. Let's see things that make ethics ethical first. Understanding what makes moral action makes it possible to try to understand the author's view of moral command theory. Understanding this perspective will allow us to analyze the authors' perspectives in detail and present the arguments that the author has to oppose. Sacred Command Ethics is a theory that states that the moral content of an act is equivalent to whether it is ordered by God or not. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. In this motivation of sacred command theory it can be said that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality. Sacred instruction theory (also known as theological autocracy) is a meta ethical theory that proposes that a morally good position is equal to whether it is God's command or not. The theory asserts that morals are ordered by God and that human morals are to obey his orders. In ancient times and modern times, believers of monotheism and polytheism often accepted the importance of the order of God in establishing morality. Historically, characters such as Saint Augustine, Dan Scott, Thomas Aquinas have proposed sacred command theory of various versions, but recently Robert Merrihew Adams proposed. God's comprehensive "modified sacred instruction theory" whose morality is related to human correctness and misunderstanding.

God will tell us that it is clearly the perfect reason for our own interests to do these things; because he loves us, he will do bad things to us I do not want to give it. The objection to the sacred command theory is that if you allow God to torture the innocent children of the world it is morally correct and it does not mean anything. Because God creates us and never applies such torture to us, especially the children. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Sacred instruction theory (also known as theological autocracy) is a meta ethical theory that proposes that a morally good position is equal to whether it is God's command or not. The theory asserts that morals are ordered by God and that human morals are to obey his orders. In ancient times and modern times, believers of monotheism and polytheism often accepted the importance of the order of God in establishing morality. Historically, characters such as Saint Augustine, Dan Scott, Thomas Aquinas have proposed sacred command theory of various versions, but recently Robert Merrihew Adams proposed. God's comprehensive "modified sacred instruction theory" whose morality is related to human correctness and misunderstanding. Philosophers have proposed God's theory of command in various forms including William Ockham, St. Augustine, Dan Scott, John Calvin. This theory usually tells that moral truth does not exist independently from God, but morality is determined by God's order. A stronger version of theory argues that God's ordering is that good behavior is the sole cause of morality, but a weak change makes God's command a significant part of a larger reason. This theory considers good behavior to be morally good due to God's orders and many religious believers agree with some form of God's command theory. Because of these prerequisites, believers believe that moral obligation is to obey God's orders; morally correct is God's desire

Many people use other art of Chinese art to explain how Chinese art is influenced by beliefs and events around artists. However, there is not much mention on the influence that Chinese artists and paintings will be accepted as the main factors that artists can use to express their art. Unlike contemporary art, pictures and sentences are mixed. This art was drawn in the Northern Song Dynasty and lasted from 960 until 1279. This picture ... China to show more content, the latter part of the dynasty Painting is meaningless compared to other arts such as sculpture and music. Artists turn their attention to art in order to express themselves, paintings do not make sense. Compared with other civilizations, China does not believe that they are very important. After the picture, Li was placed under more favorable light. They were quickly reestablished as a legitimate art form. The painter immediately started painting to express himself and the observer began to appreciate the meaning and symbols in the picture. This is useful for various forms of storytelling, and artists become more complicated. Lee's picture influenced the art loved by the masses. This picture has a deep meaning and the lesson learned is not the background symbol but the focus of the picture. Brotherhood worship means respecting parents and ancestors. This picture is based on Confucian classics written around 400 BC. The exact author is unknown, but it claims to be a dialogue between Confucius and Zengi. As with this book, this book explains how to show your strengths. The main focus of this work is filial piety. In this picture, several different scenes are shown. The scenario shows the filial piety in the "modern social dimension" (Maxwell, 40). I can see my son is saying goodbye to my parents. one more In Confucian and Buddhist ethics, marriage faith (Chinese: marriage faith, xiào) is a virtue respecting parents, elder, ancestors. Confucian marital faith was believed to have been written during the Qin and Han Dynasty era and was historically an authoritative source of the Confucian marriage faith principle. This book is a dialogue on how to build a good society with Confucius principle between Confucius and his student Zengzi. Takayuki is the core of Confucian 's role ethics Because marriage faith has been admired for the greatest morality of China for centuries, Chinese filial piety is a characteristic of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of China's morality and "every succeeding study of enlightenment exists". The Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith belief in Chinese religion is an integral part of Chinese culture and therefore is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of marital faith. Buddhism and Taoism also suggest that some of these texts support filial piety, but there is a monastery system to ensure that monks and nuns do not become children. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro first defines parole as what he is doing now, this is merely an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent, especially with respect to pleasant subjects.

The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of the various related ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to sacred command theory, things are morally good or bad, or moral obligations, simply because of God's will or command, are allowed or prohibited. It is often said that the theory of God's command is being rebutted by Euthyphro's dilemma argument. This argument is named for Plato's Euthyphro derived from it (contrary to the general idea, this argument has not been explained there). The dilemma of Euthyphro first doubts: Are they morally good So is God morally good, or are they God's will Will they be morally good? No matter how experts answered this question, we all are thinking about the problem. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to maintain morally good behavior. Since they are morally good, they must be morally good and have to be independent of the will of God. This is obviously incompatible with God's instruction theory; sacred command theorist must give Euthyphro's dilemma a second answer If Theist gives a second answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, morally good behavior is morally good, because they are God's will, and he is morally good, and he is arbitrariness, emptiness, and abnormal command issue I will face. The problem of arbitrariness is that sacred command theory seems to be based on morality in God's quirkiness. If divine instruction theory is true, it seems that God's command can not be recognized by morality or morality. But how can this ethical arbitrary order be the foundation of morality? The question of emptiness is that in the analysis of God's command of moral goodness, sentences such as "God is good" and "Order of God is good" can be given an empty tautology. "God's command follows His orders" The problem of malicious instruction is that if you want to condemn malicious acts, such as malicious fraud, deliberate atrocities, or the like, sacred instruction theory seems to be meaningful. Because sacred command theory is not the only ethical theory in Christian tradition, even if these objections are considered successful, you do not need to pay too much attention. But theologians are attracted to the instructional theory of God and therefore there is a theological reason to try to defend it. God is a creator of all things and is therefore claimed to be the creator of our moral obligation. God is claimed to have sovereignty and has the right to tell us the way to live your life. Like the Egyptian looting [Exodus 11: 2] or preparing to sacrifice a man's son [Genesis 22: 2], the divine command of action that is considered morally wrong There is also an example. It is a good moral. These considerations are easiest, but they are not simply adapted to the sacred moral teaching theory. Sacred instruction theory is the theory of meta-cognition only when the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. The sacred command theory is often argued as confirmed by "Euthyphro's dilemma" (as it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief like Krkey. Guoer's philosophy is shown. He talked about Abraham's dilemma about a position beyond the moral realm of his son Isaac's "faith of leap". The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of the various related ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to God's command theory, things are simply morally good or bad, moral obligations, permitted or prohibited, due to God's will or order. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to maintain morally good behavior. Since they are morally good, they must be morall

The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of the various related ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to sacred command theory, things are morally good or bad, or moral obligations, simply because of God's will or command, are allowed or prohibited. It is often said that the theory of God's command is being rebutted by Euthyphro's dilemma argument. This argument is named for Plato's Euthyphro derived from it (contrary to the general idea, this argument has not been explained there). The dilemma of Euthyphro first doubts: Are they morally good So is God morally good, or are they God's will Will they be morally good? No matter how experts answered this question, we all are thinking about the problem. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to maintain morally good behavior. Since they are morally good, they must be morally good and have to be independent of the will of God. This is obviously incompatible with God's instruction theory; sacred command theorist must give Euthyphro's dilemma a second answer If Theist gives a second answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, morally good behavior is morally good, because they are God's will, and he is morally good, and he is arbitrariness, emptiness, and abnormal command issue I will face. The problem of arbitrariness is that sacred command theory seems to be based on morality in God's quirkiness. If divine instruction theory is true, it seems that God's command can not be recognized by morality or morality. But how can this ethical arbitrary order be the foundation of morality? The question of emptiness is that in the analysis of God's command of moral goodness, sentences such as "God is good" and "Order of God is good" can be given an empty tautology. "God's command follows His orders" The problem of malicious instruction is that if you want to condemn malicious acts, such as malicious fraud, deliberate atrocities, or the like, sacred instruction theory seems to be meaningful. Because sacred command theory is not the only ethical theory in Christian tradition, even if these objections are considered successful, you do not need to pay too much attention. But theologians are attracted to the instructional theory of God and therefore there is a theological reason to try to defend it. God is a creator of all things and is therefore claimed to be the creator of our moral obligation. God is claimed to have sovereignty and has the right to tell us the way to live your life. Like the Egyptian looting [Exodus 11: 2] or preparing to sacrifice a man's son [Genesis 22: 2], the divine command of action that is considered morally wrong There is also an example. It is a good moral. These considerations are easiest, but they are not simply adapted to the sacred moral teaching theory. Sacred instruction theory is the theory of meta-cognition only when the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. The sacred command theory is often argued as confirmed by "Euthyphro's dilemma" (as it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief like Krkey. Guoer's philosophy is shown. He talked about Abraham's dilemma about a position beyond the moral realm of his son Isaac's "faith of leap". The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of the various related ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to God's command theory, things are simply morally good or bad, moral obligations, permitted or prohibited, due to God's will or order. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to maintain morally good behavior. Since they are morally good, they must be morall

The tension between eudaimonist or other ethical ethics and divine orders can be traced back to Plato's Euthyphro that we ask that we are right. (Philosophers sometimes call it the Euthyphro dilemma). Sacred command theory has confirmed the former and appears in Oakham, Kierkegaard, Bart, as well as works by Locke and Berkeley [Honderich, 2005, "Holy Ordering Ethics"]. Still, even today, Christian scholars can prove the historical domination of Western natural ethics. The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of a variety of relevant ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to sacred command theory, things are morally good or bad, or moral obligations, simply because of God's will and command, are allowed or prohibited. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to assert morally good behavior and they are morally good so he faces independence. Will, they are morally good, then they must be morally good, irrelevant to the will of God. This is obviously incompatible with God's instruction theory; sacred command theorist must give Euthyphro's dilemma a second answer Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. Motivation of this sacred command theory can say that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality. We have examined the morality of the theory called God's command. This is a view that its behavior is correct only when God ordered it, that it is only a mistake if God forbade it. As a realistic architect, God can judge good and evil perfectly, but he faced the difficulty of struggling a system to distribute moral value far. Please imagine the god in its original position. He decides which actions are good behavior and which actions are bad behaviors. Under the sacred command theory, remember that God's command establishes correctness, and that his prohibition has established a mistake. Imagine now that God is thinking about three kinds of actions. Stolen, fraud, attack. We believe that there is a moral order in the choice of God if we believe that these acts have a moral status when God considered them.

The tension between eudaimonist or other ethical ethics and divine orders can be traced back to Plato's Euthyphro that we ask that we are right. (Philosophers sometimes call it the Euthyphro dilemma). Sacred command theory has confirmed the former and appears in Oakham, Kierkegaard, Bart, as well as works by Locke and Berkeley [Honderich, 2005, "Holy Ordering Ethics"]. Still, even today, Christian scholars can prove the historical domination of Western natural ethics. The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of a variety of relevant ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to sacred command theory, things are morally good or bad, or moral obligations, simply because of God's will and command, are allowed or prohibited. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to assert morally good behavior and they are morally good so he faces independence. Will, they are morally good, then they must be morally good, irrelevant to the will of God. This is obviously incompatible with God's instruction theory; sacred command theorist must give Euthyphro's dilemma a second answer Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. Motivation of this sacred command theory can say that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality. We have examined the morality of the theory called God's command. This is a view that its behavior is correct only when God ordered it, that it is only a mistake if God forbade it. As a realistic architect, God can judge good and evil perfectly, but he faced the difficulty of struggling a system to distribute moral value far. Please imagine the god in its original position. He decides which actions are good behavior and which actions are bad behaviors. Under the sacred command theory, remember that God's command establishes correctness, and that his prohibition has established a mistake. Imagine now that God is thinking about three kinds of actions. Stolen, fraud, attack. We believe that there is a moral order in the choice of God if we believe that these acts have a moral status when God considered them.

Many people are using other ancient Chinese art to describe how Chinese art is influenced by beliefs and events surrounding artists. However, I do not mention much about the influence that Chinese artists and paintings will be accepted as a major factor that artists can use to express their art. Unlike contemporary art, it is a combination of pictures and words. In Confucianism and Buddhist ethics, marriage faith (Chinese: marriage faith, xiào) is a virtue respecting parents, elder, ancestors. Confucian goodwill faith was thought to have been written around Qin and Han Dynasty and was historically an authoritative source of Confucian goodwill principle. This book is a dialogue on how to establish a good society with Confucius principle between Confucius and his student Zengzi. Takayuki is the core of Confucian's role ethics Since Takayuki and Takayuki have been admired as the best moral of China for centuries, filial piety and Chinese filial piety are characteristics of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of Chinese morality, "All that follows is a study of enlightenment." Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake the generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith in China's religion is an indivisible part of Chinese culture and therefore it is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of brother worship. Buddhism and Taoism also support filial piety with some of those texts, but there is a monky system that prevents monks and nuns from becoming loyal sons. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent with respect to particularly pleasant subjects.

Many people are using other ancient Chinese art to describe how Chinese art is influenced by beliefs and events surrounding artists. However, I do not mention much about the influence that Chinese artists and paintings will be accepted as a major factor that artists can use to express their art. Unlike contemporary art, it is a combination of pictures and words. In Confucianism and Buddhist ethics, marriage faith (Chinese: marriage faith, xiào) is a virtue respecting parents, elder, ancestors. Confucian goodwill faith was thought to have been written around Qin and Han Dynasty and was historically an authoritative source of Confucian goodwill principle. This book is a dialogue on how to establish a good society with Confucius principle between Confucius and his student Zengzi. Takayuki is the core of Confucian's role ethics Since Takayuki and Takayuki have been admired as the best moral of China for centuries, filial piety and Chinese filial piety are characteristics of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of Chinese morality, "All that follows is a study of enlightenment." Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake the generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith in China's religion is an indivisible part of Chinese culture and therefore it is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of brother worship. Buddhism and Taoism also support filial piety with some of those texts, but there is a monky system that prevents monks and nuns from becoming loyal sons. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent with respect to particularly pleasant subjects.

In the 18th century, China was influenced by various principles and beliefs of society. When it was strongly done inside and outside the family, parental faith (filial piety) was the main habit of this age. Brother worship is not only guidelines for Chinese ethics, it also plays an active role in determining the lifestyle of the Chinese; it is in the family and in other areas such as education, religion and government It is done everyday. It is a central source of Chinese morality and society is based on the principle of Xiao, which of course is a premise of Chinese culture and society. Since Takayuki and Takayuki have been admired as the best moral of China for centuries, filial piety and Chinese filial piety are characteristics of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of Chinese morality, "All that follows is a study of enlightenment." Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake the generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith in China's religion is an indivisible part of Chinese culture and therefore it is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of brother worship. Buddhism and Taoism also support filial piety with some of those texts, but there is a monky system that prevents monks and nuns from becoming loyal sons. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent with respect to particularly pleasant subjects. It is the concept of filial piety that is at the center of Chinese family concept. Brothers worship refers to son or daughter. Therefore, filial piety refers to the responsibility of the family to meet the needs of the family and the desire for the male parent. More broadly, this term refers to a system where each family has their whereabouts. The superiority of men, like other civilizations of the day, is an important element in China's social system. Men are responsible for providing food to their families

In the 18th century, China was influenced by various principles and beliefs of society. When it was strongly done inside and outside the family, parental faith (filial piety) was the main habit of this age. Brother worship is not only guidelines for Chinese ethics, it also plays an active role in determining the lifestyle of the Chinese; it is in the family and in other areas such as education, religion and government It is done everyday. It is a central source of Chinese morality and society is based on the principle of Xiao, which of course is a premise of Chinese culture and society. Since Takayuki and Takayuki have been admired as the best moral of China for centuries, filial piety and Chinese filial piety are characteristics of Chinese culture. I believe that filial piety is the root of Chinese morality, "All that follows is a study of enlightenment." Chinese society is based on marriage faith, it is the theme of Chinese culture and affects every aspect of Chinese life. In this article, I will learn the importance of filial piety in Chinese culture. I do not want to mistake the generalization, but I would like to define the current theme of all Chinese families. I believe that filial piety is common to all Chinese families. Faith in China's religion is an indivisible part of Chinese culture and therefore it is accepted by three major Chinese religions, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism. Of these three, Confucianism and its excellent social stratum can best support the ideal of brother worship. Buddhism and Taoism also support filial piety with some of those texts, but there is a monky system that prevents monks and nuns from becoming loyal sons. - ... In the original definition, we could not provide the main function of sacred things. For example, Euthyphro initially defined religion as what he is doing, this is just an example, not a definition. The second definition provided by Euthyphro refers to a praiseworthy god. However, Socrates raised questions about the credibility of the "sacred identity" theory, and the gods pointed out that opinions were not consistent with respect to particularly pleasant subjects. It is the concept of filial piety that is at the center of Chinese family concept. Brothers worship refers to son or daughter. Therefore, filial piety refers to the responsibility of the family to meet the needs of the family and the desire for the male parent. More broadly, this term refers to a system where each family has their whereabouts. The superiority of men, like other civilizations of the day, is an important element in China's social system. Men are responsible for providing food to their families

Apology and critical comparison Socrates is a wonderful thinker and debater dedicated to the truth. He spent his golden age walking through the city of Athens to pursue wisdom. Socrates lives in Oracle to reveal his fate. He created and completed his own cross-checking technique; we know today that it is a Socratic method. He is thorough and indomitable. His subjects are often humiliating. Socrates will arbitrarily oppose anyone who thinks he is wrong. In his opinion, most of the people he interviewed were blind. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

Apology and critical comparison Socrates is a wonderful thinker and debater dedicated to the truth. He spent his golden age walking through the city of Athens to pursue wisdom. Socrates lives in Oracle to reveal his fate. He created and completed his own cross-checking technique; we know today that it is a Socratic method. He is thorough and indomitable. His subjects are often humiliating. Socrates will arbitrarily oppose anyone who thinks he is wrong. In his opinion, most of the people he interviewed were blind. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

My definition of art is imagination and passion expressed through the creation of visual features. I think that art is a symbol of imagination. Everything starts with thinking. People create life by thinking about how to develop; this creates art. It's as easy as watching a child draw. I imagine a picture in my mind and remember expressing my idea on paper. As I thought, the picture did not come out, but whenever I saw this picture I took the place I thought about the vision I created in my mind. Separately, this definition seems to include only reasonable art with prejudice, but if the definition of "true originality" is used above, it is determined by the potential creation Representing the organic nature of the art of art Poe made various works from 1841 to 1842, two of which were comedy. "Never bet my head: moral talk" (Graham's, September 1841. Broadway Magazine, re-released as "August 16, 1845" Do not defeat the devil ".) Burlesque performance of the tester . Toby Dammit insisted on jumping on a covered bridge under the influence of a disease called "transcendentalism". In Toby 's proposal "to let the devil in his head", the devil appeared in his own judgment and insisted on himself: "Whether you are too beautiful to transcend it, and whether you will not ignore the prosperity of the dove "" Transcendentalist "refuses to pay the speaker's fee for Toby's funeral expenses The last sacrifice of Euthyphro is the definition that belief is the art of sacrifice and prayer. Through this definition Euthyphro argues that goddess provided something to God, but this has returned to his initial argument that goddess depends on God's likes and that God has different opinions . Socrates rejected this definition. Of course, the dialogue focuses on the definition of faithfulness, but the real theme of the dialogue points out more prosecution against Socrates. Plato's explanation about the replacement made the conversation uncertain and open. Given the same embarrassing allegation that Socrates was executed later, this is ironic. Without a godly definition, there is no clear definition of faith. How can a person be tried and executed for not defining a crime? After evaluating the art and definition of artists and intellectuals in history, this is probably the most complete and simplest definition of art. One may be a scholar's definition, but this may be necessary to talk about the art itself, in addition to its original or intellectual puns and other general "explanations". If you do not fall under any of the above features or conditions, for example if you should not share art, we are talking about art or the work itself is at least incomplete. In addition to discussing the quality of various works, any form of expression follows the given definition. It must be art. Conversely, if you want to reduce this definition, you will find that many items not related to art belong to this new category by definition.

My definition of art is imagination and passion expressed through the creation of visual features. I think that art is a symbol of imagination. Everything starts with thinking. People create life by thinking about how to develop; this creates art. It's as easy as watching a child draw. I imagine a picture in my mind and remember expressing my idea on paper. As I thought, the picture did not come out, but whenever I saw this picture I took the place I thought about the vision I created in my mind. Separately, this definition seems to include only reasonable art with prejudice, but if the definition of "true originality" is used above, it is determined by the potential creation Representing the organic nature of the art of art Poe made various works from 1841 to 1842, two of which were comedy. "Never bet my head: moral talk" (Graham's, September 1841. Broadway Magazine, re-released as "August 16, 1845" Do not defeat the devil ".) Burlesque performance of the tester . Toby Dammit insisted on jumping on a covered bridge under the influence of a disease called "transcendentalism". In Toby 's proposal "to let the devil in his head", the devil appeared in his own judgment and insisted on himself: "Whether you are too beautiful to transcend it, and whether you will not ignore the prosperity of the dove "" Transcendentalist "refuses to pay the speaker's fee for Toby's funeral expenses The last sacrifice of Euthyphro is the definition that belief is the art of sacrifice and prayer. Through this definition Euthyphro argues that goddess provided something to God, but this has returned to his initial argument that goddess depends on God's likes and that God has different opinions . Socrates rejected this definition. Of course, the dialogue focuses on the definition of faithfulness, but the real theme of the dialogue points out more prosecution against Socrates. Plato's explanation about the replacement made the conversation uncertain and open. Given the same embarrassing allegation that Socrates was executed later, this is ironic. Without a godly definition, there is no clear definition of faith. How can a person be tried and executed for not defining a crime? After evaluating the art and definition of artists and intellectuals in history, this is probably the most complete and simplest definition of art. One may be a scholar's definition, but this may be necessary to talk about the art itself, in addition to its original or intellectual puns and other general "explanations". If you do not fall under any of the above features or conditions, for example if you should not share art, we are talking about art or the work itself is at least incomplete. In addition to discussing the quality of various works, any form of expression follows the given definition. It must be art. Conversely, if you want to reduce this definition, you will find that many items not related to art belong to this new category by definition.

Times, Sunday Times (2017) day (2016) Times, Sunday Times (2016), Times, Sunday Times (2016), because they suffered such a large fine, but mortgage-backed securities scandal , Banks can pay heavy price. Times, Sunday Times (2016) Times, Sunday Times (2016) day (2016) day (2016), she said: "I am definitely in a very tragic situation, very close to her near Times, Sunday Times (2016) Times, Sunday Times (2007) Arthur Conan Doyle Sherlock Holmes (1892) Tom Cannon's basic marketing. Principles and Practice (1986) Elizabeth Gaskell North and South (1855) day (2014) Times, Sunday Times (2006) Times, Sunday Times (2009) Times, Sunday Times (2014) Times, Sunday Times (2012) Christian Today (2000) Arthur Maximum Lose Voice Edward: Word (2006) Adventures of Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes (189 Sunday Times (2012) Sun (2016) executives said that the liquidity of the bank fell into a trickle due to the credit crunch, in the era of the Sunday Times (2012) and 19011910 men and women Although the currency itself is more expensive Times, Sunday Times (2008) Katie Hickman prostitute (2003) Times, Sunday Times (2007) Times, Sunday Times (2012) Times, Sunday Times (2010) Times, Sunday Times (2012) Times, Sunday Times (2011) Times, Sunday time Among those who know podcasts, some people appreciate their definition very much and win it through years of investment. PURIST is a downloadable. Mp3 file that is distributed via the standard RSS feed link in Apple's iTunes Podcast directory and is said to be playing on Apple devices. LITERALIST will say a "pod" podcast to allow people to download files from the former Apple mobile device (iPod), it needs the "Apple Connection" feature and offline listening is. The status elite just like AAC audio supporting Apple devices, but accepted as a de facto standard MP3 podcast, learning about the smartphone market with its Android presence (dominance) The second definition is because Plato does not agree with its definition. "God treasures faith rather than faith." The second definition of Euthyphros can be used to decide that what makes for the benefit of God is considered pious. For some religious things, God must be profitable. Plato does not believe that all the gods find important things, so the conversation has changed. Conflicts of interest between the gods allow for some sort of profit differentiation among them. Plato thinks belief is an invisible theme. Definition 2 was rejected as Plato believed that different gods thought different things would be beneficial. There is a lack of consensus and harmony among Gods, they do not allow each other to love and hate one. Plato is given a religious effect and quality rather than the definition of the religion itself, I believe we need to proceed. In Eutepron's five Plato dialogue, ask Socrates and Eutepron arguments "What is piety?" Eutepron Socrates corresponds to some definitions of godliness but does not answer and meets Socrates It seems. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One attempt by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered in the way Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still unsatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This is Eutepron's connection with "Every god's love is pious, on the contrary, all gods hate and be devout" (9E, P.14). In other words, since the devotion is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates did not agree again with Euthyphro's confidence that at this point he made a good statement.

Book 1 of the Plato Republic proposes what justice is. Four views of justice have been reconsidered. The first is that justice tells the truth and pay off people's debts. Second, justice will help a man 's friends and hurt the enemy. The third view of justice is the advantage of strong. The last opinion is that injustice is more profitable than justice. The book first explained that many Athenians were celebrating the introduction of the new goddess in the city of Piraeus. About this book This book contains three Plato dialogues: Euthyphro, Meno, Republic, Book 1. Translation is done by Belle Waring. If you are not familiar with Plato, you may be confused with the numbers and letter combinations - 6b, 71c etc. seen in the margin of the conversation's sidebar. These are so-called Stephanas page numbers. In 1578, Henricus Stephanus announced the complete Plato. It was the basis of a standardized reference system. Like the comment section in this book, written by John Holbo, you can refer to different versions and translated paragraphs through the Stephanus page. Speaking of comments: There are more books about Platon than you read in your life. To make matters worse, many people are good. For the authors of the review, this is a challenge. People need to tell new things new things new ways. This book is suitable for beginners, but I hope that students who have improved further can get something from them. The chapters are short and sweet, but they are getting longer These "early", "intermediate", "slow" tags have at least some meaning. The first conversation Euthyphro was quick. Meno is in the middle of the middle. Third, the Republic is an intermediary. However, the first volume may have been written before. Like Meno, it is called Early Medium. Did I answer my question: How do you read this book? Maybe I said someone who meets you, this is not the same. I did not even have easy-to-understand answers. Fortunately, I will put another crack on this case in Chapter 4. At the same time, in the next two chapters, will you pursue the key people we work on? The problem is deeper. Who is Socrates? Who is Plato? What did they say? What do they mean by saying this? What do they think?

Book 1 of the Plato Republic proposes what justice is. Four views of justice have been reconsidered. The first is that justice tells the truth and pay off people's debts. Second, justice will help a man 's friends and hurt the enemy. The third view of justice is the advantage of strong. The last opinion is that injustice is more profitable than justice. The book first explained that many Athenians were celebrating the introduction of the new goddess in the city of Piraeus. About this book This book contains three Plato dialogues: Euthyphro, Meno, Republic, Book 1. Translation is done by Belle Waring. If you are not familiar with Plato, you may be confused with the numbers and letter combinations - 6b, 71c etc. seen in the margin of the conversation's sidebar. These are so-called Stephanas page numbers. In 1578, Henricus Stephanus announced the complete Plato. It was the basis of a standardized reference system. Like the comment section in this book, written by John Holbo, you can refer to different versions and translated paragraphs through the Stephanus page. Speaking of comments: There are more books about Platon than you read in your life. To make matters worse, many people are good. For the authors of the review, this is a challenge. People need to tell new things new things new ways. This book is suitable for beginners, but I hope that students who have improved further can get something from them. The chapters are short and sweet, but they are getting longer These "early", "intermediate", "slow" tags have at least some meaning. The first conversation Euthyphro was quick. Meno is in the middle of the middle. Third, the Republic is an intermediary. However, the first volume may have been written before. Like Meno, it is called Early Medium. Did I answer my question: How do you read this book? Maybe I said someone who meets you, this is not the same. I did not even have easy-to-understand answers. Fortunately, I will put another crack on this case in Chapter 4. At the same time, in the next two chapters, will you pursue the key people we work on? The problem is deeper. Who is Socrates? Who is Plato? What did they say? What do they mean by saying this? What do they think?

Plato was a philosopher born in Athens (470 - 390 BC), a student of Socrates. He feels that wisdom and self-perception belong to a completely independent field or reality. He believes that the general concept of knowledge exists in the soul or even in life before it is destined or born. Plato believes that the universe is understandable and the universe is mathematically understandable. He believes mathematical objects can be seen as a perfect form. Plato has three important philosophies. Kindness, truth and beauty, and desire for eternal life. These important terms can be used to indicate Diotima's love signs. Plato's first philosophical point of view is kindness. When Socrates talked about the teachings of love of Diotima, he used a kind of ratio, that is, beauty is beautiful, and every male wants to be beautiful because it is very good. What does he want when a man loves beauty? "I answered her," Beauty may be him. "But," she said, "The answer casts another doubt: What will you give to beauty?" It's a problem for you, "I replied. The answer is not ready. "And you can put the word" good "in a beautiful place and repeat the question once again. If you love what you love, what does he love? I said. "What did he get and what did he have?" I am happy. (Symposium) As I mentioned in the devout analysis of Plato's Euthyphro, Greek philosophers Plato and Socrates are often undetectable and compatible in their contribution to their philosophical theory. When you read their thoughts and sentences, you can think of these ideas and thought experiments that were suggested mostly by two philosophers or two philosophers. In Plato Republic, Plato copied the dialogue between infamous Socrates and some of his followers. In the dialogue, Socrates was given the task of creating a perfect city. Most of the written content is actually Plato's view on utopian society, but the lecturer is called Socrates and is a famous philosopher of Greek society. Socrates' student Plato is traditionally thought to be the best source of philosopher life and work, but many scholars are hard to distinguish between the philosophical views of Plato and Socrates, and the lives of Socrates I emphasized that it is more difficult to describe accurately. For that reason, some people think that Xenophon is a more reliable source of information about Socrates as a historical figure. Plato and Xenophon are the main source of Socrates private life. From their writings, the famous ancient Greek philosopher was born in the masonry (or sculptor) Sophroniscus and his midwife his wife Phaenarete. He spent his life in Athens, but his early life has little detail. It is said that he was relatively late to marry Xanthippe, participating in the Peloponnesus War (431 - 04 BC), and Xanthippe was much younger than he. She gave him three sons - Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus

Delphi god replied that no one is smart. Socrates certainly believes this is a kind of joke or riddle, he can not talk and talk about what Delphi said. Socrates decided to investigate a man thought to be wise to others or to him, but he was not smart, he just looked outside. The man who heard the news was angry with Socrates and opposed other people against Socrates. After that, Socrates moved from politicians to politicians, from poets to craftsmen 's poets, and they were less clever than Socrates. The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that Athens bound the philosophical teachings of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . Apologies are one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo", and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's oracle is not a wise person in Athens. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

Introduction  Today's business is more profitable, efficient and successful because it expands e-commerce by marketing, selling and selling goods and services online to consumers. In the next presentation we answer and answer questions about whether the electronic contract is legally binding and about the best legal practices for providing goods and services. Overseas Customers This presentation will also cover the state laws and federal laws of the headquarters. Finally, the next presentation discusses the potential legal process and the idea of ​​dealing with customer objections to legality to avoid customer complaints. NUR 391 Week 1 Personal work My personal care idea NUR 391 Week 2 Allocation Care demonstration history number NUR 391 week 3 Critical thinking worksheet assignment issues NUR 391 4 Assignment of ethics and legal issues in nursing thesis NUR 391 Fifth week Future of home vision care NUR 513 WEEK 1 DQ 1 NUR 513 WEEK 1 Nursing timeline history development NUR 513 WEEK 2 DQ 1 NUR 513 WEEK 2 DQ 2 NUR 513 WEEK 3 Comparison and analysis of distribution concepts NUR 513 WEEK 3 DQ 1 NUR 513 weeks 3 DQ 2 NUR 513 weeks 4 handouts documentation NUR 513 weeks 4 DQ 1 NUR 513 weeks 4 DQ 2 NUR 513 weeks 5 nursing concept model assignment analysis NUR 513 5 weeks DQ 1 NUR 513 weeks 5 DQ 2 NUR 513 weeks 6 issues Nursing theory care plan part 1 NUR 513 weeks 6 issues nursing care theory care plan part 2 NUR 513 weeks 6 DQ 1 NUR 513 weeks 6 DQ 2 PHI 200 Weeks 2 DQ 1 Ethics and Relativism PHI 200 Weeks 2 DQ 2 Animal Rights PHI 200 Weeks 2 Document Assisted Work Support Suicide PHI 200 Weeks 3 DQ 1 Skeptical Limit PHI 200 Weeks 3 DQs 2 Creation Theory PHI 200 3 Weeks Eye Challenge Assessment Final Article (Death Penalty) PHI 200 Weeks 4 DQ 1 God exists PHI 200 Weeks 4 DQ 2 Turing Test PHI 200 Weeks 4 Tests PHI 200 Weeks 5 DQ 1 Philosophical Value PHI 200 Weeks 5 DQ 2 Philosophy and Society PHI Assignment of tasks 5 times per week Final discussion paper Death penalty ................................. .... .............................................. .. PHI 208 WEEK 1 DQ 1 What is Philosophy? PHI 208 Week 1 DQ 2 PHI Certification 208 Week 2 DQ 1 Ethics and Relativism PHI 208 Weeks 2 DQ 2 Animal Rights PHI 208 Week 2 Allocation Famine, Wealth and Moral PHI 208 Weeks 3 DQ 1 Skeptic Limit PHI 208 Weeks 3 DQ 2 Truth and Knowledge Limit PHI 208 Weeks 3 Plato Euthyphro PHI 208 Weeks 4 DQ 1 Assignment Evidence of God Presence PHI 208 Weeks 4 DQ 2 Turing Test PHI 208 Weeks 5 DQ 1 Life Meaning PHI 208 Weeks 5 DQ 2 Philosophy And Social PHI 208 Final Article of Homework for Week 5 Hearing of God

Socratic Method The Socratic philosophical method is basically a series of questions leading the answer. In order for this method to be effective, two conditions must be satisfied. First of all, the dialogueist must say his belief. The second is that you have to shorten the answer. The following is a typical example of how this method works. This is dialogue between Socrates and Yutofuro. The article is "gods care about piously, not godly". So Socrates let Euthyphro agree on the following points. For example, we can not discuss papers based on alcoholism of British girls, Ophelia of Hamlet, or medicine at school. You have to write a paper based on one opinion of them. Furthermore, in general, the clearer the opinion and the more expressive, the clearer the article will be for you and the reader or listener. The paper should answer this question: What is the host of this discussion trying to convince me what I believe? If that is not clear, the main purpose of the discussion is to be ambiguous or missing. Therefore, special attention must be paid to accurately define the article and complete the introduction. Let's think about teen alcoholism. In many countries around the world, young people can get alcoholic beverages in a way prohibited in this country. But why do teenagers in the United States use alcohol as a "school problem"? Was not it so in the 1940s? What is the fundamental question that some people think is a school problem? How is the situation, who is worried about it? Let's start with a fundamentally "far" non-personal attitude: there is no problem in itself ... only the situation; others feel that there are problems with these situations. Let's take a look at the first analysis problem. All analytical problems are simple, but in order to use it effectively, you need to follow certain instructions. We will explain these in each section and explain with examples. Adolescent alcoholism is one of the main problems affecting academic performance and causing health problems, causing the death of young drivers and their passengers. Many teenagers drink because they do not understand the danger of drinking when thinking it is cool. In 2008, 4,241 students of the Atlanta public school system investigated drinking opinion, 74% of 6th graders think there is a health risk, and 25% think that there is a health risk.

An apology is the defense of Socrates in trial. Socrates pointed out that when the dialog began, his accuser warned the jury about the eloquence of Socrates, and Socrates said that the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates tells the truth It was said that it was. Socrates distinguishes between two groups of accusers: early complaints and late accusers. Since they did not appear in the courtroom, the early group was the most difficult to defend. He was accused of being a boss: he was a teacher and gathered money for his teachings. In class, we talked about the apology of Plato: Socrates, which was the previous mission. Reading is "apology" of Socrates, but this is not a real apology. In the class we talked about the truth of the apology. Our real apology idea is to insist that Socrates have sarcastic inner consciousness or guardian insight into Socrates. He also regards himself as a tool of the gods and they teach them the true ignorance of them. He also said that he knows that he is smarter than him and that he is the only one who knows his ignorance Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. According to Plato 's apology Socrates began his life as "bullish" in Athens his friend Chaerephon asked Delphi whether someone is smarter than Socrates; Oracle said that no one is smarter. Socrates believed that Oracle's reaction was wrong because he thought he had no wisdom. Then he seduced a mystery by approaching Athenian politicians, poets and craftsmen. However, Socrates questioned this: Everyone thinks he is smart with knowing much, but in reality they do not know very little and they are not at all smart. Socrates has recognized that Oracle is right; the so-called wise men think he is intelligent but not so, but he himself knows that he is not smart. To an ignorant person

The problem of the lack of God's moral begins with the assumption that morality is created not only by God's approval but by God altogether. It also avoids the possibility that such gods and humans can not create morals using God's inner powers to strengthen them, thereby enhancing the possibility of moral learning I will. Possibilities The ideas presented are directed to those who think themselves as religious beliefs, atheists or agnosticists themselves. The problem of the lack of God's moral begins with the assumption that morality is created not only by God's approval but by God altogether. It also avoids the possibility that such gods and humans can not create morals using God's inner powers to strengthen them, thereby enhancing the possibility of moral learning I will. Possibility The suggested idea is for those who do not have religious beliefs ... Buy gifts and promises. Men usually have a slight disadvantage here when people are dating them to spend money. God in the Bible gives us a clear overview of how to meet his blessings. Today, there are various evaluation methods; stand for the first night, no strings, only for an interesting relationship. These relationships are never blessed by God; a dating relationship should be based on the bond of God of love. Treat your part in the same way you want him / her to treat you Plato raised the next dilemma, Euthyphro, in his conversation. "Is it good for God to master goodness, is that it is good or is it ordered by God?" (4) Dr. Ge's argument or second, morality is God, ie subjective It depends on morality. In any case, this dilemma at least reasonably doubts the first premise and can at best deny it at best. It is unfair to continue if Dr. Craig is not allowed to deal with this dilemma. Many people claim that there is a necessary connection between morality and religion, so there is no morality without religion (especially without God and God). There is a related phrase that religion is motivated to act in a morally correct way and religion is necessary to lead to action, but the inevitable relationship of morality and religion comes from God or God It means that is correct and wrong. . This morality is called sacred command theory. The result is that the behavior is correct or mandatory. If God told us not to do so, unless God instructs us not to do it, moral permission is

Postwar and contemporary Philippine literature - Culture and Arts Council Your bibliography: Culture, Arts and Cultural Council. (2015) Postwar and contemporary Philippine literature - Culture and Arts Council. [Online]: http: //ncca.gov.ph/subcommissions/subcommission-on-the-arts-sca/literary-arts/philippine-literature-in-the-post-war-and-contemporary-period / [2016 I visited on October 5] The citation will automatically generate a fully formatted reference for the reference page or bibliography of the job of your chosen style. Log in to Cite This For Me account and save the bibliography directly to Microsoft Word, Evernote, EndNote, etc. and export. If this is too much Looking for tools to save time in quotations and reference books of academic papers? This can be done by quoting this to the ME's IEEE reference generator. With our free web and mobile app you can quickly, easily and intelligently format references in IEEE style accepted by academic institutions. In many styles, if the author's name is displayed in the text, IEEE uses a numbering system to make the paper easier to read. The numbers in the text relate to numbered references at the end of the research papers to determine which articles contribute to which part of the paper. Quotation marks from all sources are used for direct quotes and parenthesized quotes. Do not put the URL in the body of the paper; see the online documentation of the author's name or article title. Place the URL at the end of the paper on the task reference page. We encourage you to submit draft paper to each student to provide online counseling services useful for essays and proofreading. Write a double-space article of 2 to 5 page type quoting secondary academic materials such as main text (Euthyphro 10b) and Stanford University Encyclopedia of Philosophy as follows To save time and effort when browsing websites, books, and magazine articles, Cite This For For Me automatically finds the reference information and fills in several forms. It sounds like a myth of school, but that is true! When quoting these sources you can find the source you are referring, starting with the search bar. By choosing the right information source from the list displayed results, you can see the information found and the information that was not found. Then go directly to the form. Here you can check, edit and add information before adding the reference to the list - you can control the reference at any time and make the final decision

The most prominent thing about women in apology of Socrates against Socrates is that they lack what we might expect. Only two specific women were mentioned: 1) Apollo's shrine maiden Pythia (2) The mother of Thetis, Achilles (himself) named after himself, who answered Chaerephon's question that nobody is wiser than Socrates (21a) Although it is not mentioned, it is only known as "the son of Thetis"), he warned him that he would die if he killed Trojan hero Hector (28c). The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that the Athenians combined the philosophical teaching of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. At the center of this discussion is Sokrateth 's relativeness always found in Athens, which is reflected in the choice that Socrates will stay in Athens for the majority of his time. The innocent aim of Socrates is to explore the death of Socrates and reasonably support the jury of the Socrates trial in the judgment of the death penalty. One of the main arguments against Socrates in his trial was "rude". This assertion concretely states that Socrates ignored the gods of the accepted city and introduced the new gods. "Ignore the spirit of the masses" may refer to Socrates' individualism Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. - When I read Plato's apology, I began to get lost, but as I started reading it I began to understand it. He has been condemned not to acknowledge the gods accepted by the state for his life, and the corrupted youth. When he was not tried his speech was an apology that did not acknowledge the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. It is a very simple dialogue method. With the main sources of trial and death of the philosopher Socrates (BC 469-399 BC), Socrates apologize, with trial, one of four dialogues of Socrates, Euthyphro, Phaedo, Crito, Plato is a philosopher I detailed the last days of Socrates. The apology of the philosopher Plato (Socrates 429-347) to Socrates is one of many interpretive apologies to Socrates's corruption and the defense of defamation legal defense and most apologies are after the Socrates trial. It was released in 399 BC. Therefore, Plato 's Socrates is the defense of Socrates' early philosophy presented in the form of Socrates' dialogue. Aristotle later classified it as a new type, but still a useful historical source for Socratic philosophers (469-399 BC).

Oracle, which is believed to be the voice of the Greek god Apollo, told Socrates' friend friend Chirephon that nobody is smarter than Socrates. Surprisingly, Socrates speculated that God said that this is the only reason Socrates seems to know only things he does not understand. Socrates explained that this made him different from most of the people he met (I think they think they know something when they do not know) (p. 27). Often others do not know what they claim to know, at least when asked by Socrates. Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death (Xenophon said he hopes to obtain such a result, explanation of the trial in Plato 's apology seems to corroborate this). The last days of Socrates were recorded in Plato's Euthyphro, apologies, critics, and faedo. This is the end of our friends, which I think, this is the smartest, most elegant person, and the best person I know "(Phaedo, 118) When I read Plato's apology, I began to get lost, but when I began to read it, I began to understand it. He has been condemned not to acknowledge the gods accepted by the state for his life, and the corrupted youth. When he was not tried his speech was an apology that did not acknowledge the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. That is a very simple way of speaking. - Socrates was born around 469 BC and became one of the world's most famous philosophers during his lifetime. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, most of the information on Socrates is second hand and unlike many other philosophers, he has never written anything. Known information seems to come from his most famous student Plato's work. As Plato introduced Socrates' trial and death, writers, artists and philosophers began to review this issue and for some people, Plato's "smartest and smartest" program Democracy and democratic deficiency prompted to be executed; for others, Athens' action is a legitimate defense of recently rebuilt democracy. In the Socratic Test (2007), Andrew Owen said he reluctantly accepted the conviction that the jury voted for the trial in order to be faithful to Athenian's democracy. "In the war, and in the dramatic change of society and intellectuals, I felt that Socrates was forced to publicly express his views, regardless of their outcome.

Socrates and the Republic of Plato Socrates used critical thought as a means to clarify the criteria of the priesthood during his lifetime but taught his disciples the importance of continuing the investigation according to the law. Socrates focused mainly on defining sacred things in Euthyphro - a critical debate as a starting point for his philosophy to preserve the importance of lifelong curiosity, the public of apologies It leads to investigation. Socrates kept asking for enlightenment of "criticism". Although it is necessary for him to conduct an investigation, since the public's curiosity has its legal price, he tried to explain that the asker must continue. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.

The "Times" blogger on philosophy believes that being an atheist does not mean "everything happens" - in reality it is reversed. What do you think? Is morality independent of God? Are those people who do not believe in God as good as those still? What determines your decision to act ethically, and how to do it yourself? I think many people think that atheism means nihilism - rejecting God means rejecting morality. They deduce that people who deny God must be indifferent at least in consideration of right and wrong, even though they are not aggressive evil. Only morality is independent of God, and we can get a sense of morality from religious worship. Only morality is independent from God and anyone can have a moral foundation that supports God's order. Let's explain why. First of all, let's quietly look at the influence of having morally minded on the existence of God. Please consider the following moral decisions - in my opinion, the judgment is clearly correct. These specific moral decisions are not true unless morality rests on the existence of God, that is, God does not exist. In my opinion, this is a special proposition. If God does not exist - then does slavery become an Englishman? Is there any problem with torture? What does the pain of others say? Now think about our personal relationship - how do we love our parents, children, our life partner, our friends. The moral values ​​of these people depend on the existence of God, meaning that these people themselves are worthless. Their boat or their car. In other words, the historical connection we cherish, the character and personality character we love is that it is useless on its own. Student: Please read Anthony's post and tell me what you think about this complex topic. Where does morality come from? What leads you to think about actions? Do you choose ethical behavior? Mainly due to the commitment of rewards or the threat of punishment - from God or other authorities? If you are an atheist, if you do something that you can express morally, God can oppose you as opposed to thinking that living your life in a moral way is more important You can forgive, this is the only value in your life. What is your choice? Please give the following comments to the students aged 13 and older. Please use only your name. For reasons of privacy policy, students' comments will not be posted using the last name. One day I realized that Freethinkers used a new slogan to print a poster. Of course, not all atheists are liars, thieves, murderers. On the contrary, many people are very happy people. But at a deeper level, the slogan destroyed itself. So I went to the table and began discussing this with Freethinkers. I claimed that it is impossible to do good without God. When you believe in God, you also believe that God is good. This is the start of discussion. God is just kind and can only decide what is good. Julia Carter, professor of philosophy at Dartmouth College, said in her book "Ethics", "The central idea behind the theory of God's will as a moral foundation is this is God's will Only if God orders it, "You must accept God, when you do this, he will guide you through the Holy Spirit just to do the right thing But what will happen if it does not work? Simplicity: We have not obeyed God's instructions and orders, God leads us to choose good things, but also gives us the ability to make choices This explains why we sometimes make the wrong choice, but we can not blame God with the wrong choice.This is our responsibility, so we are You must approach the God for gas. Well, good morals come from him Plato raised the following dilemma in his dialogue Euthyphro. "Is God so advantageous as it is a good thing or a good thing, is there a benefit that God ordered?" (4) If it is the beginning, since morality is not objective in God Dr. Craig is denied. Arguments or second, morality depends on God, ie subjective morality. In any case, this dilemma at least reasonably do

"Betrayal is too gentle to explain the father who says that she loves her daughter but insists she has to teach her about the horrors of the world in order to be a stronger man.The pain experienced by her She was so strong that she could not think; her head is too fast, I can not remember who she is or how she got there. She knows only pain. It was only despair that she felt. She tried shouting for help, but soon she knew that no one was listening. Even if she cries loudly, she can not stop or change what is going on. No matter what she does, the pain will not stop. Her father ordered her to torture and told her she was for her own interests. He told her that discipline is necessary or she is seeking cheating. Betrayal is a simple word that represents overwhelming pain, overwhelming loneliness, isolation of this child. Abuse was not enough during the ceremony, and the child received similar abuse at home everyday. When she tried to talk about her pain, she told me she was strange. "There was nothing wrong with you." Her family told her that she began to feel increasingly everyday, she no longer believed her feelings. She did not know that this strong and lonely desperate child learned to abandon the feeling that everyone feels alive. As she gets older she gets stronger. She learned to do her best to do what she said. She has forgotten everything she wants. The pain is still hidden but it is easier to pretend that it is not there than to acknowledge the fear that she is buried in the deepest part of her heart. Her emotional strength overwhelmed her relationship. She asked for help from the outside, but it seemed that she could not find what she was looking for, and the pain got worse. Loneliness begins. When feeling returns, she will win by panic, pain, and despair. She is sure that she will die. But when she looked around her, she could not see anything that would make her feel so sick. Deeply, she knows that something is very, very wrong, but she does not remember anything. She thought, "Maybe I am crazy." These abuses cite all kinds of abuse including child abuse, rape and domestic violence, and related abuse such as. Mention of abuse to a beautiful picture provides inspiration and insight experienced by many abusive victims. Please freely share it on your website, blog or social page. Insightful abuse words: "Even if we do not cry anymore, even if we are asleep, I'll snuggle up in his arm, it will leave another scratch, and eventually all the Scars will leave a scar, which is what I can do - there is a problem with the scar of big love. " A paper on the drawing of blood effects Does FARICO influence other than paper? The citation paragraph of the paper on the study of animal cruelty in this thesis cited a phrase to write advanced essays. Why electoral colleges are bad articles expressed in research papers on national education policy sari essayah koulutusnetti (alnus acuminata descriptive articles) Papers published in social fable paper quarter paper question 26 Analysis articles by ks 2 king's letters 26 Analysis paper euthyphro Dilemma registration An analysis paper on paper Christian College? Anne-Marie Slaughter, why can not women still have all Richard Dorment, why can men not have it all? "* Raynard Kington, I am gay and African American. * Laurie Frankel, from him to first grade * Andrew Reiner Stephen Mays, teaching the emotional honesty of men, how about the sex role in homosexuality? Eucharist is the real Emmanuel - Part 2 - Regis Scanlon, O Now Atwater is quoted. If a speculative roar of a person is "the one that seems to be the closest to an abstract smoking gun and is equivalent to the abuse and institutionalized abuse of racial discrimination", this means that It is relatively small evidence of being. "You must not quote me." He should listen to his opinion. It seems absurd that Republicans must work very hard to overcome white racist votes. There are only two choices. Republicans or the w

Meno is one of Plato's earliest conversations Book is deeply writing about the core problem: how can you teach virtue? If not, then whether virtue is born then, whether by nature or not. Socrates solved this problem by asking the person who claimed to understand the meaning of this term (Plano's Meruno). The purpose of this paper is to explain the influence of Socrates' method of Plato's "The Apology of Meno" on Meno's own personality. After casting doubts on Meno's virtue, Socrates concluded that he and Meno did not know the meaning of that word, then he pointed out that a thorough definition should be found. Socrates Elenchus is the way Socrates questioned the proposal. His method was tested and explained in Plato's Euthyphro and Meno. Socrates' approach is a series of steps designed to test or challenge claims. Scientific methods are modern methods used to test theory. There are similarities and differences between Socrates' s Elenchus and the scientific method. - convicted for life Regardless of whether it is obligatory to comply with any law, whether it is injustice or evil, it is actually a matter of legal system that exists physically As long as it is a valid rule. In the following configuration, we will study the answer to this question from the perspective of Socrates. The best way to understand this almost "WWSD" approach (which Socrates will be doing) approach is to see Socrates' s behavior in the three platonic conversations we read. Plato's Meno is a Socratic Dialogue where the two main speakers of Socrates and Meno (translated with Menon) discuss humanity's virtue: is it what it can be taught? The other participants in the dialogue are Meno's slave and the Socrates prosecutor Athens politician Anytus, and Meno is friendly. Meno is visiting Athens in Thessaly, and there are many companions by him. Meno is a young and beautiful and Golgius student, Gorgias is an outstanding hearing impaired, and his view on virtue clearly influences Meno. In the early days of conversation, he claimed that he raised such views repeatedly on virtue issues and in front of a large audience. In Plato's Socrates dialogue "Meno" Socrates discussed whether Menor could use Professor Meno. However, when talking to Socrates, Meno was confused and seemed to stop learning too much as he did not seem to have all the arguments. Here we face someone who again thinks they know things they do not actually know. Meno said, "When you do not know what it is, how do you investigate one thing, even if you have the focus of this conversation, you immediately come out of virtue. Can Socrates teach Meno saying that the man can not find what he knows or does not know, he does not need to find out what he already knows and knows There is no way to find out that there is nothing.

The second accusation Plato said was that Socrates was accused of thinking that the problem is metaphysical. This means not believing what God teaches them but believing in things like science and reason. This is one of the main things he did and the Athenians hate him most. The actual claim of this article is that "Socrates is an evil actor, a curious person who finds things in the basement and heaven." What kind of fake crime is this true meaning? Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. - Many educators believe that science is a complex instructional subject as it requires long preparation and planning. First of all, the teacher needs to fully understand the student 's abilities before beginning to develop curriculum for science courses. Some of the important areas that teachers need to find include levels of attention, interest and skills, knowledge and experience previously learned, and other special needs. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. Plato's apology is the story of the Socrates trial, his charges against him and through his process. At the beginning of the trial, Socrates seemed to have challenged accusations, including corrupting the youth, challenging the beliefs of the gods accepted and inspired by the state, and introducing new religious focus . I am trying to counter his behavior in the court. In essence, Socrates looked almost self-righteous and his defense surprised even his plaintiff, Meletus. However, at the end of the apology, Socrates became almost a different person. And while showing his own worth, he refused to plead for forgiveness and even did not save his life. Plato's view of Socrates is the difference between the accused and the person accused.

Morality has principles or customs ("morality") from the perspective of correct behavior or mistaken behavior. Morality is something people can or can lack. In religion, it is necessary to believe in a moral god. However, in ancient Greece, the Greek religion believed in the unethical behavior of the gods and goddesses. An ancient Greek religion is a polytheism that believes in many gods and goddesses. For the Greeks, these gods and goddesses will be able to rule over everything. Every god or goddess has its own personality and territory. Many people claim that there is a necessary connection between morality and religion, so there is no morality without religion (especially without God and God). There is a related phrase that religion requires religion to motivate and act in a morally sound way, but the inevitable relationship between morality and religion comes from God or God Most people believe it means correct. . This morality is called sacred command theory. The result is that the behavior is correct or mandatory. If God told us not to do so, unless God instructs us not to do it, moral permission is Is God ordering morality because it is correct, or is it correct as it is ordered by God? As it is correct, if God commands it correctly, justice seems to be determined by moral standards unrelated to God's orders, and God himself demands moral obedience and his own as a supreme being I question the status. On the other hand, if correctness is right, God orders it, so there is no moral restriction in the order of God, morality is completely arbitrary. Even a bad behavior is considered correct. This contemporary Euthyphro dilemma can be translated into an objection to the existence of the sovereign Creator, the traditional monotheistic god. This Socrates debate does not deny the existence of God as the highest existence but still emphasizes the serious challenge to believers who believe that theological truth is necessary for morality.