On Euthyphro's Dilemma and Divine Command

Bertrand Russell argues that you are in this situation if you judge the difference between good and evil. Whether there is a difference or not, it is due to God's order. If this is due to the command of God, it says that there is no difference between what is right for God and what is wrong, saying that God is good is no longer an important word. Since God's order is good and he is not independent of the fact that he has committed them, you must say that good and evil have any meaning independently of God's command . Let's say that God is good.

From the dilemma of Euthyphro, Plato believes that the order of God is never true morality. Sacred orders belong to God or orders come from God. This argument arises from the idea that God is omnipotent and omniscient, and when he finds a failure he will punish us. So the fear of motivating us to obey these God orders is not a proper motivation for some moral acts. Another argument advocated by Plato is that God prescribes such a command of God to be moral and that morality presents the idea that morality exists as a separate entity from God is. Both views show that God's command acts for the benefit of individuals and casts doubt on the motive of moral behavior, so it is not true morality.

Essay.com/ Why does Plato think that sacred orders are never true moral order? Do you agree?

Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm.