Apology and the Crito Comparison

Apology and critical comparison Socrates is a wonderful thinker and debater dedicated to the truth. He spent his golden age walking through the city of Athens to pursue wisdom. Socrates lives in Oracle to reveal his fate. He created and completed his own cross-checking technique; we know today that it is a Socratic method. He is thorough and indomitable. His subjects are often humiliating. Socrates will arbitrarily oppose anyone who thinks he is wrong. In his opinion, most of the people he interviewed were blind.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient.

You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology