The Presentation of Socrates' Arguements in Plato’s Apology and Crito

In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. Exploring this contradiction between Socrates, faithful citizen, and Socratic philosopher will help to position Plato's argument.

Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology