anarchy
[2023-01-29 18:13:09]
1530 - 1540; (<Central Anarchism or Medieval Latino Anarchism) <Greek and anarchism are lawless and literally lack a leader. 1 + arch (os) leader + -os adj. suffix) + - a - y 3
Especially when it is considered to be the result of the absence or failure of the government
C16: From the Latin chaos of the Middle Ages, from Anakia of Greece, from Anahophis without ruler, an- + arkh leader, arkhein to rule
In the 1530s, from the anarchists of France, or from medieval Latin anarchism, from Greek Anakia, "lack of leaders, no government people" (Athens used a tyrant of 30 years in 40 BC, an unrusted person ), A state noun from "a nameless" of anarkhos, "from" of an- (see an- (1)) + "leader" of arkhos (see archon)
Even if it is an eternal country, even if it destroys the lives of individuals and communities, takes over every field of human activity, causing war and domestic power struggle, that palace revolution will supersede other tyrants I can only do it. ... ... he's dead! Or new destiny will start in thousands of centers due to the destruction of the state, aggressive initiatives by individuals and organizations and free consensus. The choice is yours! [Peter Kropotkin Crown Prince (1842-1921)]
What is anarchy? Anarchy is absence of government. The concept of disorder existed as early as the fifth century BC, and since then many different disorders have emerged. Some people believe that anarchy is a violent overthrow of the government, only strong people can survive, and in this crazy Marx environment there is domination of confusion. But others believe that chaos is not totally disorder. In fact, if the world is self-sufficient, the world will be better. According to disorder and activist articles by Janelle Hartman, "Disorders are not threats, hatred and violence, but about peace, respect and cooperation" (1)
Anarchicism and nationalism are incompatible, it explains why nationalists must misunderstand people by defining chaos as confusion and confusion. Two completely consistent political theories have been claimed to be anarchism and totalitarianism. Anarchism completely accepts the concept of self, totalitarian completely rejects this concept. Rules always degenerate to totalitarianism. Jesus Christ is the best example of true disorder - a creative non-violent anarchist - working in a bottom-up way with the poor and the poorest poor, not top-down, giving power to people, with men Enable them to realize their potential as women do in the image of God
In all parts of the world, including South Africa, the word "anarchism" was used to condemn crazy people. Headings such as "refusal to anarchy", "forefront of anarchy" or "face anarchy of South Africa" will tell us the understanding of that term. But more importantly, these articles draw our attention to the government and what it should do: to rule the people of the country. Unfortunately, this is the one we distract us from casting doubt on its validity first. Do you need a government? Anarchism - anarchists are trying to achieve anarchism using political theory - there is a clear answer: No, they are not!