Constitutional Democracy

In this article we explore the three main ways to build constitutional democracy and convert the last part into a constitutive role. Each uses democracy as the framework of the Constitution. The analysis is not historical but conceptual. It develops an ideal type that reflects the main position of major figures in constitutional democracy and contemporary discussion on established democratic practices in Europe, North America and the Commonwealth. It first traces some of the defining characteristics of two important terms of constitutionalism and democracy, and the sections that follow explore the main way they are combined. The first two explanations found the rationale for democracy in the legal constitution, which embodied the democratic value that constrained and defined the actual democratic process. In the first description, the Constitution restricted the outcome of democracy; in the second part the Constitution has achieved a democratic process. In both respects, constitutionalism is seen as a higher law maintained by the Constitutional Court. In contrast, the third argument is that the democratic process itself is constitutional, self - limiting and defined. The need to adopt a democratic process to reach collective decisions makes constitutional democracy itself. Reduction of these three accounts is an indispensable part of each democracy. The constitutional democracy here refers to the use of democracy to discuss and examine the constitution, including the constitution of the democratic process itself. In the last section, we will explore how each account assumes this role, consistent with the more general concept of democracy and constitutionalism it promotes. Though these three descriptions are considered to be cautious, in fact the existing constitutional democracy often includes all elements of these nationality. If that is the case the article ends with a brief discussion of whether or not they should be combined.

Republicanism and American constitutional democracy. Students should be able to explain how and why the concept of classic republicanism is reflected in the constitutional democratic values ​​and principles in the United States. Therefore, the ITU government is the government of genuine, genuine people. It is formally and essentially from them as well. That power is given by them, they are exercised directly and exercised for their benefit. It is explained in how the concept of classical republicanism is reflected in the US Constitution, for example, the guarantee of the "Republican government" in the parliamentary election of "(Republic No. 4)" in the preface. Correction of Article 1, Paragraph 2 and Article 17

In this article we explore the three main ways to build constitutional democracy and convert the last part into a constitutive role. Each uses democracy as the framework of the Constitution. The analysis is not historical but conceptual. It develops an ideal type that reflects the main position of major figures in constitutional democracy and contemporary discussion on established democratic practices in Europe, North America and the Commonwealth. It first traces some of the defining characteristics of two important terms of constitutionalism and democracy, and the sections that follow explore the main way they are combined. The first two explanations found the rationale for democracy in the legal constitution, which embodied the democratic value that constrained and defined the actual democratic process. In both respects, constitutionalism is seen as a higher law maintained by the Constitutional Court.