In Plato's critique life, people are guided by moral beliefs and principles. Whether their beliefs are good or bad, their decision is based on them. In Plato's "criticism", Socrates emphasized his moral beliefs and principles when he decided not to escape from prison. Socrates had the opportunity to avoid his death sentences but he chose not to do so because there is a moral obligation to sacrifice. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In the criticism of Plato, Creole tried to convince Socrates to escape from prison so that he could avoid being executed. Creo thinks that Socrates is executed unfairly, so the best way is to escape. The next step is why Socrates was not able to escape detention. Both agreed that Socrates' claim to him is innocent. The dilemma she faces is whether to abide by the law or to break the law based on the fact that Socrates should not be forced to be innocent. Legal or conscientious debate as to which person dominates the person. Creole promised to Socrates to help him escape, and Socrates rejected the proposal. Socrates said, "So we should not do the wrong things? ... Maybe as many people think, when the injured are injured, we have to hurt someone Because fraud is not bad, it is not good to do wrong to deal with fraud.

In Plato's critique life, people are guided by moral beliefs and principles. Whether their beliefs are good or bad, their decision is based on them. In Plato's "criticism", Socrates emphasized his moral beliefs and principles when he decided not to escape from prison. Socrates had the opportunity to avoid his death sentences but he chose not to do so because there is a moral obligation to sacrifice. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In the criticism of Plato, Creole tried to convince Socrates to escape from prison so that he could avoid being executed. Creo thinks that Socrates is executed unfairly, so the best way is to escape. The next step is why Socrates was not able to escape detention. Both agreed that Socrates' claim to him is innocent. The dilemma she faces is whether to abide by the law or to break the law based on the fact that Socrates should not be forced to be innocent. Legal or conscientious debate as to which person dominates the person. Creole promised to Socrates to help him escape, and Socrates rejected the proposal. Socrates said, "So we should not do the wrong things? ... Maybe as many people think, when the injured are injured, we have to hurt someone Because fraud is not bad, it is not good to do wrong to deal with fraud.

The criticism of Mr. Kroto Plato occurred after Socrates was sentenced to death and sat down in a prison cell. Creo was a close friend of Socrates, wanted to persuade him to visit Socrates and persuade him to escape to his old friend. But Socrates logically denied Creo's assertion. Creo began his argument from telling Socrates the bad news, he told him that the ship from Delos was approaching and that he was the moment he was approved to die. Socrates seemed dissatisfied with his fateful death, but Creo tried to persuade him to help him escape from prison and escape from Athens. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments. Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?

The criticism of Mr. Kroto Plato occurred after Socrates was sentenced to death and sat down in a prison cell. Creo was a close friend of Socrates, wanted to persuade him to visit Socrates and persuade him to escape to his old friend. But Socrates logically denied Creo's assertion. Creo began his argument from telling Socrates the bad news, he told him that the ship from Delos was approaching and that he was the moment he was approved to die. Socrates seemed dissatisfied with his fateful death, but Creo tried to persuade him to help him escape from prison and escape from Athens. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments. Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?

There are many examples of Plato's critique, Socrates stays in Athens and cites the reasons for facing his death. The scope of discussion ranged from his age to impossible and two reactions to a common reaction failed. One of the reasons I'm going against is the obligation of Socrates against the city where he lived and the expression of the rules he followed. In Athens, like other cities, people follow the rules set in their respective cities. Because he / she believes these laws or does not believe and is silent. In Plato 's apology, Plato stated that Socrates' sin was pronounced "infringing the young people, not believing in the god of state faith, but believing in other new spiritual beings" (24c). In Plato's critic, Socrates' s faithful friend, Creo tried to save him. But Socrates still shows that he will not leave Athens, he would rather accept the death penalty rather generously. - At Plato's apology, he talked about how Socrates 'friend, Chaerephon, went to the temple of Delphi, and asked God how Socrates' s wisdom and how it compares with other people on the planet It was. "I asked if he was wiser than anyone than me, and he said that Pythian is not smart anybody" (Plato). This reaction is very confusing for Socrates. Because he bothered him for a while that he is not at all bad. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy. In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments.

There are many examples of Plato's critique, Socrates stays in Athens and cites the reasons for facing his death. The scope of discussion ranged from his age to impossible and two reactions to a common reaction failed. One of the reasons I'm going against is the obligation of Socrates against the city where he lived and the expression of the rules he followed. In Athens, like other cities, people follow the rules set in their respective cities. Because he / she believes these laws or does not believe and is silent. In Plato 's apology, Plato stated that Socrates' sin was pronounced "infringing the young people, not believing in the god of state faith, but believing in other new spiritual beings" (24c). In Plato's critic, Socrates' s faithful friend, Creo tried to save him. But Socrates still shows that he will not leave Athens, he would rather accept the death penalty rather generously. - At Plato's apology, he talked about how Socrates 'friend, Chaerephon, went to the temple of Delphi, and asked God how Socrates' s wisdom and how it compares with other people on the planet It was. "I asked if he was wiser than anyone than me, and he said that Pythian is not smart anybody" (Plato). This reaction is very confusing for Socrates. Because he bothered him for a while that he is not at all bad. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy. In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted youth. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. Written by Plato, Crito is the dialogue between Socrates and his best friend Christo. It will be set up in a cell of a prison in Socrates on the day before he is being executed. Creo came to dawn and persuaded Socrates to break the law and break the prison. Indeed, he gave bribes to security guards and made all the arrangements necessary for Socrates to escape. But Socrates can only persuade law violations to be genuine through rational arguments.

Introduction Criticism As Socrates is not the only one, he pointed out that should not escape the death penalty. Socrates' s Creos inference is troubling, Cleo and friends can offer ransom of the watchman, so I'd like to persuade him to escape. If not for myself, Socrates must be for his friend, son and those who benefit from his guidance escape. The opinions of Socrates and Creo start from this point. By the way, I think space is a consideration, but I conclude that the philosopher of Socrates of defense can further offer objections and want to point out "I have not written the fourth part Defensive philosopher fails "" Creo's first claim by Socrates concerned people's ideas. Creo said that Socrates was too scared, or accused of becoming too cheap friends and can not schedule to run away. Then he argued that Socrates provided what they wanted to his enemies by accepting his fate. Creo urged him to fight the injustice that occurred. He was expecting to be one of his movements in the major allies of the South Church, but again and again and again, because they are still "silent" for his reasons, he contributed injustice I disagree. Too many church leaders believe in civil rights Caucasians, regardless of their church's social movement, Pastor King believes that this weakness eventually leads to their church, they are It is not a problem unless you change it. Creo, Socrates suggests many reasons Socrates should escape. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to the child is the strongest. Creo's first argument is that if Socrates does not escape, Socrates will be injured in two ways Creole. When Socrates dies, Criton 's reputation will be compromised that Kriston will lose a good friend. People do not know if Socrates chose to remain in prison They would think of Creo's opportunity to leave Socrates, but he did not want to spend money so he did not. This will give Christo a reputation for more money than a friend. This argument considers the result of Creole Socrates' action. In the second argument with Criton, Socrates grasps the reason why he did not want to escape. On the one hand it is possible to pay people but there is still doubt as to whether it is a moral matter. What is Clio seeking Socrates? Introduction Criticism As Socrates is not the only one, he pointed out that should not escape the death penalty. Socrates' s Creos inference is troubling, Cleo and friends can offer ransom of the watchman, so I'd like to persuade him to escape. If not for myself, Socrates must be for his friend, son and those who benefit from his guidance escape. From that point of view, Socrates and Criton. By the way, I want to point out, although I believe it further

Introduction Criticism As Socrates is not the only one, he pointed out that should not escape the death penalty. Socrates' s Creos inference is troubling, Cleo and friends can offer ransom of the watchman, so I'd like to persuade him to escape. If not for myself, Socrates must be for his friend, son and those who benefit from his guidance escape. The opinions of Socrates and Creo start from this point. By the way, I think space is a consideration, but I conclude that the philosopher of Socrates of defense can further offer objections and want to point out "I have not written the fourth part Defensive philosopher fails "" Creo's first claim by Socrates concerned people's ideas. Creo said that Socrates was too scared, or accused of becoming too cheap friends and can not schedule to run away. Then he argued that Socrates provided what they wanted to his enemies by accepting his fate. Creo urged him to fight the injustice that occurred. He was expecting to be one of his movements in the major allies of the South Church, but again and again and again, because they are still "silent" for his reasons, he contributed injustice I disagree. Too many church leaders believe in civil rights Caucasians, regardless of their church's social movement, Pastor King believes that this weakness eventually leads to their church, they are It is not a problem unless you change it. Creo, Socrates suggests many reasons Socrates should escape. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to the child is the strongest. Creo's first argument is that if Socrates does not escape, Socrates will be injured in two ways Creole. When Socrates dies, Criton 's reputation will be compromised that Kriston will lose a good friend. People do not know if Socrates chose to remain in prison They would think of Creo's opportunity to leave Socrates, but he did not want to spend money so he did not. This will give Christo a reputation for more money than a friend. This argument considers the result of Creole Socrates' action. In the second argument with Criton, Socrates grasps the reason why he did not want to escape. On the one hand it is possible to pay people but there is still doubt as to whether it is a moral matter. What is Clio seeking Socrates? Introduction Criticism As Socrates is not the only one, he pointed out that should not escape the death penalty. Socrates' s Creos inference is troubling, Cleo and friends can offer ransom of the watchman, so I'd like to persuade him to escape. If not for myself, Socrates must be for his friend, son and those who benefit from his guidance escape. From that point of view, Socrates and Criton. By the way, I want to point out, although I believe it further

Please apologize and criticize Socrates about the lifetime wandering around the city of Athens while asking the citizen he met about his ideas and ideals. He cast doubt on the idea of ​​the elders and as some of his acquaintances had fought against Athens, they took him to apology for "Platte" in court because he did not like urban power . In his trial, Meletus, Anytus, and Lyncon charged Socrates with the moral charges of a corrupt youth, kept young people away from democracy, ignored the nation's gods, and introduced the new sanctity. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man.

Please apologize and criticize Socrates about the lifetime wandering around the city of Athens while asking the citizen he met about his ideas and ideals. He cast doubt on the idea of ​​the elders and as some of his acquaintances had fought against Athens, they took him to apology for "Platte" in court because he did not like urban power . In his trial, Meletus, Anytus, and Lyncon charged Socrates with the moral charges of a corrupt youth, kept young people away from democracy, ignored the nation's gods, and introduced the new sanctity. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man.

The controversy between Socrates and Clio Socrates raised questions and answers through a conversation with Creo to check if his expulsion hurts his reputation. The question and answer to Socrates' creo have to judge whether there is a legitimate reason in my society to support my own good and evil, and I must be proud of my guided life . Socrates tried to prove that there was only one choice he made to his crew, Creto, who questioned these two concepts: "I am the best discussion for me, only the ears are the ear It is a kind of person who can tilt. Creo's first argument against Socrates was about people's ideas. Creo said that Socrates' friends would be criticized for being either too scared or too cheap to arrange to escape. Then he insisted that Socrates provided his enemies what they wanted by accepting his fate. Creo urged him to fight injustice he had. He had expected the Southern Church to be one of the major allies of his movement, but the reason why they objected to him over and over again is still "silence", which brought about corruption It was. If too many white church leaders believe that civil rights are a social movement unrelated to their church, Dr. King, due to such weakness, will eventually I think that we will make our church useless Creo showed a number of reasons Socrates had to escape Socrates. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo is that if Socrates does not run away, Socrates harms Creo in two ways. When Socrates dies, critics will lose good friends and critic's reputation will be hurt. People did not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison, they think they had the opportunity to let Socrates depart, but he did not do so because he did not intend to spend money . This gives Crito a high reputation with more money than a friend. This discussion considers only the impact of Socrates' actions on Creo. In Crito 's second argument, he inferred why Socrates did not want to run away. It is possible to pay salaries to people, but there is still doubt as to whether it is an ethical issue. What is Crito's request for Socrates? At the beginning of the critique, Socrates detailed the discussion of "experts" used to prove that Maretus did not care about youth education. Creo, when Socrates was executed, urged Socrates to escape on the grounds that he did not perform his duties in order to save Socrates, "I do not really know whether you or my people think or not" (44b). In his power. Socrates pointed out that "we" should certainly not pay attention to our view of Hui Poloi, "Hui Epicestat" is the only person worth considering - that event The process to understand -. But Krito is very clear that when a person is slandered, they can accomplish almost the greatest evil, so the result of the trial is "to be careful about what polii thinks" I answered that there was (44 d)

The controversy between Socrates and Clio Socrates raised questions and answers through a conversation with Creo to check if his expulsion hurts his reputation. The question and answer to Socrates' creo have to judge whether there is a legitimate reason in my society to support my own good and evil, and I must be proud of my guided life . Socrates tried to prove that there was only one choice he made to his crew, Creto, who questioned these two concepts: "I am the best discussion for me, only the ears are the ear It is a kind of person who can tilt. Creo's first argument against Socrates was about people's ideas. Creo said that Socrates' friends would be criticized for being either too scared or too cheap to arrange to escape. Then he insisted that Socrates provided his enemies what they wanted by accepting his fate. Creo urged him to fight injustice he had. He had expected the Southern Church to be one of the major allies of his movement, but the reason why they objected to him over and over again is still "silence", which brought about corruption It was. If too many white church leaders believe that civil rights are a social movement unrelated to their church, Dr. King, due to such weakness, will eventually I think that we will make our church useless Creo showed a number of reasons Socrates had to escape Socrates. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo is that if Socrates does not run away, Socrates harms Creo in two ways. When Socrates dies, critics will lose good friends and critic's reputation will be hurt. People did not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison, they think they had the opportunity to let Socrates depart, but he did not do so because he did not intend to spend money . This gives Crito a high reputation with more money than a friend. This discussion considers only the impact of Socrates' actions on Creo. In Crito 's second argument, he inferred why Socrates did not want to run away. It is possible to pay salaries to people, but there is still doubt as to whether it is an ethical issue. What is Crito's request for Socrates? At the beginning of the critique, Socrates detailed the discussion of "experts" used to prove that Maretus did not care about youth education. Creo, when Socrates was executed, urged Socrates to escape on the grounds that he did not perform his duties in order to save Socrates, "I do not really know whether you or my people think or not" (44b). In his power. Socrates pointed out that "we" should certainly not pay attention to our view of Hui Poloi, "Hui Epicestat" is the only person worth considering - that event The process to understand -. But Krito is very clear that when a person is slandered, they can accomplish almost the greatest evil, so the result of the trial is "to be careful about what polii thinks" I answered that there was (44 d)

In Plato's critique life, people are guided by moral beliefs and principles. Whether their beliefs are good or bad, their decision is based on them. In Plato's "criticism", Socrates emphasized his moral beliefs and principles when he decided not to escape from prison. Socrates had the opportunity to avoid his death sentences but he chose not to do so because there is a moral obligation to sacrifice. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In the criticism of Plato, Creole tried to convince Socrates to escape from prison so that he could avoid being executed. Creo thinks that Socrates is executed unfairly, so the best way is to escape. The next step is why Socrates was not able to escape detention. Both agreed that Socrates' claim to him is innocent. The dilemma she faces is whether to abide by the law or to break the law based on the fact that Socrates should not be forced to be innocent. Legal or conscientious debate as to which person dominates the person. Creole promised to Socrates to help him escape, and Socrates rejected the proposal. Socrates said, "So we should not do the wrong things? ... Maybe as many people think, when the injured are injured, we have to hurt someone Because fraud is not bad, it is not good to do wrong to deal with fraud.

In Plato's critique life, people are guided by moral beliefs and principles. Whether their beliefs are good or bad, their decision is based on them. In Plato's "criticism", Socrates emphasized his moral beliefs and principles when he decided not to escape from prison. Socrates had the opportunity to avoid his death sentences but he chose not to do so because there is a moral obligation to sacrifice. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates is condemned to be a lawyer to "teach things to others" and "to investigate things on the ground and the ground to make weaker claims more visible." (Apology, Plato, Philosophical Classical, page 21) Socrates was also denounced the existence of God and was accused of eroding young people. Socrates tried to prove he is innocent In the criticism of Plato, Creole tried to convince Socrates to escape from prison so that he could avoid being executed. Creo thinks that Socrates is executed unfairly, so the best way is to escape. The next step is why Socrates was not able to escape detention. Both agreed that Socrates' claim to him is innocent. The dilemma she faces is whether to abide by the law or to break the law based on the fact that Socrates should not be forced to be innocent. Legal or conscientious debate as to which person dominates the person. Creole promised to Socrates to help him escape, and Socrates rejected the proposal. Socrates said, "So we should not do the wrong things? ... Maybe as many people think, when the injured are injured, we have to hurt someone Because fraud is not bad, it is not good to do wrong to deal with fraud.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In my opinion, I think that Socrates respects the ability to pursue the laws and justice of the country, but when the concept of his own morality or justice conflicts with the state they will gladly question ing. With this in mind, I think that Socrates will take the same action as Antigone of Sophocles of Antigone. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In my opinion, I think that Socrates respects the ability to pursue the laws and justice of the country, but when the concept of his own morality or justice conflicts with the state they will gladly question ing. With this in mind, I think that Socrates will take the same action as Antigone of Sophocles of Antigone. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. Exploring this contradiction between Socrates, faithful citizen, and Socratic philosopher will help to position Plato's argument. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. Exploring this contradiction between Socrates, faithful citizen, and Socratic philosopher will help to position Plato's argument. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

Comparison of criticism and apology We can see that Socrates is an imaginative and a permanent person as he presented many contradictions with respect to the two articles we read on Plato's Kreto and apologies. The most convincing person, but he never wrote a sentence; most ugly but most attractive; ignorant and wise; accidentally convicted, but to avoid his unfair enforcement I am reluctant. Socrates is the most Athenian, most indigenous, citizen and philosopher's patriot, but the Athenians are most selfish. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. - Socrates' defense began with Socrates, he said he did not know whether his jury in Athens is convinced by his accusers. This is an important statement, as Socrates explains how many of his mistakes made by whistleblowers, especially if it proves that it is not true. His accusers warned that Socrates is a "smart" speaker, and if a "smart speaker" is the one who speaks the truth, he declared that he would recognize himself as a speaker.

Comparison of criticism and apology We can see that Socrates is an imaginative and a permanent person as he presented many contradictions with respect to the two articles we read on Plato's Kreto and apologies. The most convincing person, but he never wrote a sentence; most ugly but most attractive; ignorant and wise; accidentally convicted, but to avoid his unfair enforcement I am reluctant. Socrates is the most Athenian, most indigenous, citizen and philosopher's patriot, but the Athenians are most selfish. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. - Socrates' defense began with Socrates, he said he did not know whether his jury in Athens is convinced by his accusers. This is an important statement, as Socrates explains how many of his mistakes made by whistleblowers, especially if it proves that it is not true. His accusers warned that Socrates is a "smart" speaker, and if a "smart speaker" is the one who speaks the truth, he declared that he would recognize himself as a speaker.

Apology and critical comparison Socrates is a wonderful thinker and debater dedicated to the truth. He spent his golden age walking through the city of Athens to pursue wisdom. Socrates lives in Oracle to reveal his fate. He created and completed his own cross-checking technique; we know today that it is a Socratic method. He is thorough and indomitable. His subjects are often humiliating. Socrates will arbitrarily oppose anyone who thinks he is wrong. In his opinion, most of the people he interviewed were blind. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

Apology and critical comparison Socrates is a wonderful thinker and debater dedicated to the truth. He spent his golden age walking through the city of Athens to pursue wisdom. Socrates lives in Oracle to reveal his fate. He created and completed his own cross-checking technique; we know today that it is a Socratic method. He is thorough and indomitable. His subjects are often humiliating. Socrates will arbitrarily oppose anyone who thinks he is wrong. In his opinion, most of the people he interviewed were blind. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. - Compliance with Socrates / Platonic's methodology and asking Euthyphro through dialogue; in particular "What is holiness?" Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro will not yield results after unnecessary deliberation. Euthyphro's definition of different beliefs is "I am doing the faith of God" and "I honor the pleasure of God". Socrates proves that these definitions are not sufficient. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying. There are many explanations and theories about Plato's apology and criticism of Socrates. One of the theories is that Plato's view on civil disobedience has changed between apology and critical writing. (Grott, Volume 1). Grott believes that Plato seeks flaws of apology and will try to supplement them in criticism. Plato noticed that he saw his defense in front of the court as Socrates tried to slap the established government law and its jurisdiction that it is very arrogant and uncompromising in his apology It was. "According to Great, Plato deliberately called for criticism, did everything to correct Socrates' s unhappy world impression and restore reputation (Woozley, 2), but this position is completely independent Ruined Creo as a work that I thought, it was just a post apology apology

The last days of Socrates were drawn the last days of Socrates and the dialogue with Creo reviewed Socrates in the last days before he was executed. Socrates was condemned not to worship the state, but to defile the youth. During his trial, he denied all charges and tried to protect himself by provering his innocence. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. His longtime friend Krito proposed Socrates a plan to escape the death penalty. Plato speaks in the last days of Socrates, just before he executes Athens. In the conversation, Socrates' student Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates believes that this proposal is trying to judge whether avoidance is "fair" or "morally rational". After all, Socrates thought that the deed was considered "unfair" and "not morally justified". Socrates is a pursuer The last days of Socrates were drawn the last days of Socrates and the dialogue with Creo reviewed Socrates in the last days before he was executed. Socrates was condemned not to worship the state, but to defile the youth. During his trial, he denied all charges and tried to protect himself by provering his innocence. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. - Socrates defends the trial according to his values ​​In his apology, Plato explained about the trial that led him to make Socrates of Mentor and his friends executed. The account shows that the defendant of Socrates is fundamentally different from his own values ​​and they get annoyed as he tries to prove that they left them. These differences caused conflicts between the parties and ultimately led to his trial. Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?

The last days of Socrates were drawn the last days of Socrates and the dialogue with Creo reviewed Socrates in the last days before he was executed. Socrates was condemned not to worship the state, but to defile the youth. During his trial, he denied all charges and tried to protect himself by provering his innocence. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. His longtime friend Krito proposed Socrates a plan to escape the death penalty. Plato speaks in the last days of Socrates, just before he executes Athens. In the conversation, Socrates' student Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates believes that this proposal is trying to judge whether avoidance is "fair" or "morally rational". After all, Socrates thought that the deed was considered "unfair" and "not morally justified". Socrates is a pursuer The last days of Socrates were drawn the last days of Socrates and the dialogue with Creo reviewed Socrates in the last days before he was executed. Socrates was condemned not to worship the state, but to defile the youth. During his trial, he denied all charges and tried to protect himself by provering his innocence. He was found guilty and received a death sentence. - Socrates defends the trial according to his values ​​In his apology, Plato explained about the trial that led him to make Socrates of Mentor and his friends executed. The account shows that the defendant of Socrates is fundamentally different from his own values ​​and they get annoyed as he tries to prove that they left them. These differences caused conflicts between the parties and ultimately led to his trial. Prior to executing Athens, Plato's "Critic" dialogue reconsidered the last days of Socrates. In the conversation, Socrates's friend Krito suggested that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates examined this proposal and tried to decide whether to escape whether "justice" and "morality" were reasonable or not. Socrates opposes his escape by linking national rules with the public's duties. Socrates believes that his execution is reasonable as he believes himself to act unfairly by evading the country, himself and his believers. Creo considers the implementation of Socrates to be unfair for several reasons, but the most important thing is that Socrates is imprisoned unfairly. In this article I will compare the two arguments and state my idea. Why do you think Socrates' decision is the best decision?

Socrates is one of the earliest philosophers and teachers of Western philosophy. He lived in Athens, Greece from 470 BC to 399 BC. Because of his insight and understanding of the ways people should live, they have been studied today. Socrates was accused of committing countless crimes at the end of his life. Crime and youth ideological corruption etc. After all, Socrates was judged convicted immediately after being sentenced to death sentence. During his imprisonment he was visited by a friend named Kreto who discussed his death in addition to his proposal to escape from the prison. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. Socrates believes that the law is an image of a common father in society. Crito is a prison scene in the story. A group of friends of Socrates sent Krito to prison to help persuade Socrates to escape. Creo was a loyal friend who tried to convince Socrates to leave prison. Creo wants Socrates to exile from Greece. Friends of Socrates believe that if Socrates and his teachings were killed, that would be wrong. Socrates refused to escape from prison. Socrates pointed out to Creo many points, pointing out why he could not escape. The first thing Socrates pointed out is "If we do not follow his instructions, we will injure our own parts and erode it, it will only be improved through actions and destroyed by unreasonable behavior Socrates said he would erode his body if he did not abide by the verdict and basically his life would not be worth it.Socratic claims It is very reasonable, if you pursue a good life without corruption, your life after death will be very good.I think that it is very important to lead moral life! Introduction Socrates criticized him as not to evade the death penalty. Cleo was puzzled about Socrates' inference, and Cleo and his friends were able to persuade him to escape as they were able to offer ransom to security guards. If it is not for himself, Socrates should escape for his friend, son and those who benefit from his teachings. The views of Socrates and Crete start from this point. By the way, I still believe it

Socrates is one of the earliest philosophers and teachers of Western philosophy. He lived in Athens, Greece from 470 BC to 399 BC. Because of his insight and understanding of the ways people should live, they have been studied today. Socrates was accused of committing countless crimes at the end of his life. Crime and youth ideological corruption etc. After all, Socrates was judged convicted immediately after being sentenced to death sentence. During his imprisonment he was visited by a friend named Kreto who discussed his death in addition to his proposal to escape from the prison. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. Socrates believes that the law is an image of a common father in society. Crito is a prison scene in the story. A group of friends of Socrates sent Krito to prison to help persuade Socrates to escape. Creo was a loyal friend who tried to convince Socrates to leave prison. Creo wants Socrates to exile from Greece. Friends of Socrates believe that if Socrates and his teachings were killed, that would be wrong. Socrates refused to escape from prison. Socrates pointed out to Creo many points, pointing out why he could not escape. The first thing Socrates pointed out is "If we do not follow his instructions, we will injure our own parts and erode it, it will only be improved through actions and destroyed by unreasonable behavior Socrates said he would erode his body if he did not abide by the verdict and basically his life would not be worth it.Socratic claims It is very reasonable, if you pursue a good life without corruption, your life after death will be very good.I think that it is very important to lead moral life! Introduction Socrates criticized him as not to evade the death penalty. Cleo was puzzled about Socrates' inference, and Cleo and his friends were able to persuade him to escape as they were able to offer ransom to security guards. If it is not for himself, Socrates should escape for his friend, son and those who benefit from his teachings. The views of Socrates and Crete start from this point. By the way, I still believe it

Both sides of Socrates. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. - Socrates' defense began with Socrates, he said he did not know whether his jury in Athens is convinced by his accusers. This is an important statement, as Socrates explains how many of his mistakes made by whistleblowers, especially if it proves that it is not true. His accusers warned that Socrates is a "smart" speaker, and if a "smart speaker" is the one who speaks the truth, he declared that he would recognize himself as a speaker. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy.

Both sides of Socrates. By reading Plato's apology for Socrates and Christ, I was able to see how Socrates made a significant decision and what his main decision was. As a person, we have personal ethics that leads to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes, your own morals and beliefs may oppose the state's view, or enforce the law and ask for justice. In this case, we rely on our own beliefs by seeking morality, or by believing in higher powers to pursue justice. In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. - Socrates' defense began with Socrates, he said he did not know whether his jury in Athens is convinced by his accusers. This is an important statement, as Socrates explains how many of his mistakes made by whistleblowers, especially if it proves that it is not true. His accusers warned that Socrates is a "smart" speaker, and if a "smart speaker" is the one who speaks the truth, he declared that he would recognize himself as a speaker. In Plato's 'criticism', Socrates and Christ talked deeply about the cause of Socrates escape. Socrates was accused of defiling the hearts of the young people in Athens. Christopher's student and close friend Christos tried to persuade him to escape because he did not believe that Socrates committed the actual crime. Socrates believes that if the government punishes him because he violated the commandments he may have violated the law. - Socrates's Socrates trial is a source of excellent events between Socrates' life and death. Athens is a democratic city and I am proud of freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates is a political philosopher who does not agree with freedom brought by democracy of Athens. But it is in his trial that the democracy of Athens and Socrates itself shows their hypocrisy.

Exploring the disobedience of Sophocles' Antigone citizen, the letter of King from Birmingham Prison, and Plato's comments. Civil disobedience has created many major and widely debated questions established by famous wisdom scholars and shows many examples of civil disobedience. Can Antigonus king of Sophocles rebel against citizens? Letters from Birmingham Prison, Plato? It draws attention from the work of Creo. The specific statements exemplified in these works are increasingly popular to oppose citizens' competition and will continue to be recognized as solutions to reform established legislation in the future You should. Thoreau's civil disobedience and Henry David Thoreau's two articles from Birmingham Prison "Citizen's Disobedience" and Martin Luther King's "Letters from Birmingham Prison" Comparative Author's View Each author wrote a letter from his prime When dealing with government-related justice, Thoreau said: "It quickly became a better government, not immediately without government, it is a threat ... Helal Ahmed Smith Professor 2010 Mr. Martin Jut's "Letters from Birmingham Prison" at MLK's Bringham Jail, October 6, was written during the eight days in prison in 1963. It is widely known as one of America's most isolated cities He chose to protest by traveling in Birmingham and solved the problem of being illegally arrested because of his "extremists" as a way of this protest Exploring the disobedience of Sophocles' Antigone citizen, the letter of King from Birmingham Prison, and Plato's comments. Civil disobedience has created many major and widely debated questions established by famous wisdom scholars and shows many examples of civil disobedience. Can Antigonus king of Sophocles rebel against citizens? Letters from Birmingham Prison, Plato? It draws attention from the work of Creo. The specific statements exemplified in these works are increasingly popular to oppose citizens' competition and will continue to be recognized as solutions to reform established legislation in the future You should.

Exploring the disobedience of Sophocles' Antigone citizen, the letter of King from Birmingham Prison, and Plato's comments. Civil disobedience has created many major and widely debated questions established by famous wisdom scholars and shows many examples of civil disobedience. Can Antigonus king of Sophocles rebel against citizens? Letters from Birmingham Prison, Plato? It draws attention from the work of Creo. The specific statements exemplified in these works are increasingly popular to oppose citizens' competition and will continue to be recognized as solutions to reform established legislation in the future You should. Thoreau's civil disobedience and Henry David Thoreau's two articles from Birmingham Prison "Citizen's Disobedience" and Martin Luther King's "Letters from Birmingham Prison" Comparative Author's View Each author wrote a letter from his prime When dealing with government-related justice, Thoreau said: "It quickly became a better government, not immediately without government, it is a threat ... Helal Ahmed Smith Professor 2010 Mr. Martin Jut's "Letters from Birmingham Prison" at MLK's Bringham Jail, October 6, was written during the eight days in prison in 1963. It is widely known as one of America's most isolated cities He chose to protest by traveling in Birmingham and solved the problem of being illegally arrested because of his "extremists" as a way of this protest Exploring the disobedience of Sophocles' Antigone citizen, the letter of King from Birmingham Prison, and Plato's comments. Civil disobedience has created many major and widely debated questions established by famous wisdom scholars and shows many examples of civil disobedience. Can Antigonus king of Sophocles rebel against citizens? Letters from Birmingham Prison, Plato? It draws attention from the work of Creo. The specific statements exemplified in these works are increasingly popular to oppose citizens' competition and will continue to be recognized as solutions to reform established legislation in the future You should.

The kings of Sophocles Oedipus and Plato's Creo are actively expressing the concept of legalization and each shows a change in the use of authority through the reason and formality of the legal form. However, there are several small problems in the legal justification of both. Traditional justification has been shown to the king of Edpsus in the divine intervention with Dove God. In addition, Socrates announced his vision of slow death at Krito. As "an ideal tragedy", it is "Oedipus King" written by Sophocles. In this play, Sophocles creates scenes, intonations, emotions throughout the script, using the concept of tragedy and the theory of importance of recognizing and flipping the scene. King Thebes' mythical king, Edpsus, experienced a terrible tragedy including a moment of recognition and reversal. These moments are the key to the fame and appreciation of the play "Oedipus the King". Sophocles uses Aristotle's concept As a tragedy of Greece, Oedipus, written by Sophocles (BC 496 - 406), claimed the definition of a tragedy by Aristotle (384 - 32 BC). The first criterion of Greek tragedy is that the hero is a good person, a double blessing, a good heart, and a high will. Sophocles soon revealed that Oedipus was such a person at the beginning of the play. As often seen in Greek tragedies, Edeps is also a nobleman. - Sophocles' satire use is the greatest ever in history, as was successfully proved by the King of Oedipus. He uses sarcasm in various ways to express ambition and discreet humor (whether it is cosmic or dramatic), and the irony of words to increase a higher level of intelligence Use the. Each word mentioned has a large symbolic meaning, and these words help to reflect the story of the plan of God. In Sophocles Oedipus' s irony drama "Oedipus", Sophocles often uses satire as a clear subject of exploratory knowledge. I do not know how terrible the poverty will be when the truth is revealed, King Obio Tebe, Edeps, who made a speech on finding killers of King Rayas. "Then then I must reveal the dark ones again ... Anyone who kills the king of Leo - you can decide to kill me anytime.The revenge for the ancient Greeks The murder of the king is known for their tragedy The function of these plays is "to propose human nature, his position in outer space, and the power to rule his life" (Greek Word "1). (1968) tragedy usually pointed out "including the ultimate and impressive disaster due to unexpected or unfilled failure including people of respect and sympathy." This usually requires an ironic change in wealth, often leaving a strong impression.

The kings of Sophocles Oedipus and Plato's Creo are actively expressing the concept of legalization and each shows a change in the use of authority through the reason and formality of the legal form. However, there are several small problems in the legal justification of both. Traditional justification has been shown to the king of Edpsus in the divine intervention with Dove God. In addition, Socrates announced his vision of slow death at Krito. As "an ideal tragedy", it is "Oedipus King" written by Sophocles. In this play, Sophocles creates scenes, intonations, emotions throughout the script, using the concept of tragedy and the theory of importance of recognizing and flipping the scene. King Thebes' mythical king, Edpsus, experienced a terrible tragedy including a moment of recognition and reversal. These moments are the key to the fame and appreciation of the play "Oedipus the King". Sophocles uses Aristotle's concept As a tragedy of Greece, Oedipus, written by Sophocles (BC 496 - 406), claimed the definition of a tragedy by Aristotle (384 - 32 BC). The first criterion of Greek tragedy is that the hero is a good person, a double blessing, a good heart, and a high will. Sophocles soon revealed that Oedipus was such a person at the beginning of the play. As often seen in Greek tragedies, Edeps is also a nobleman. - Sophocles' satire use is the greatest ever in history, as was successfully proved by the King of Oedipus. He uses sarcasm in various ways to express ambition and discreet humor (whether it is cosmic or dramatic), and the irony of words to increase a higher level of intelligence Use the. Each word mentioned has a large symbolic meaning, and these words help to reflect the story of the plan of God. In Sophocles Oedipus' s irony drama "Oedipus", Sophocles often uses satire as a clear subject of exploratory knowledge. I do not know how terrible the poverty will be when the truth is revealed, King Obio Tebe, Edeps, who made a speech on finding killers of King Rayas. "Then then I must reveal the dark ones again ... Anyone who kills the king of Leo - you can decide to kill me anytime.The revenge for the ancient Greeks The murder of the king is known for their tragedy The function of these plays is "to propose human nature, his position in outer space, and the power to rule his life" (Greek Word "1). (1968) tragedy usually pointed out "including the ultimate and impressive disaster due to unexpected or unfilled failure including people of respect and sympathy." This usually requires an ironic change in wealth, often leaving a strong impression.

For example, the question that Socrates thinks he is exaggerated means that they never understand the essence of their work or existence. Whether young people were destroyed nature when they were in front of them. As he says, we can learn more about its nature through the application of Socrates. Slightly slow due to its size, you need to be stirred by robbery. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

For example, the question that Socrates thinks he is exaggerated means that they never understand the essence of their work or existence. Whether young people were destroyed nature when they were in front of them. As he says, we can learn more about its nature through the application of Socrates. Slightly slow due to its size, you need to be stirred by robbery. In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man. You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.

The purpose of "critics" is to show the character of Socrates, not to be a philosopher, but to believe in the mission of God, to be unfairly condemned as a good citizen, to want to give up his life . We obey the laws of the country. The main argument that seems to require discussion between Creo and Socrates is the recognition of the fate of Socrates by most people. In "Crito" Socrates said: "Why should we care about most people's ideas?" (Plato 45) Socrates cares about the thought of most people I believe it should not be. In response to Chris' view, Socrates initially thought about why the opinion of most people is not the most important opinion. Second, what is the impact of escaping the city of Athens, and the third So, whether escape is cheating or not, as it will hurt Socrates' soul. If Creo does not help Socrates escape, what do they think? If Socrates is not responsible for his children, what do they think? Socrates believes that the opinions of experts are more important than the majority of opinions. He raised a well-trained example. Athletes do not pay attention to the general public's advice, but focus on their trainers. Taking steroids, eating whatever you want, listening to public opinion, such as training for 20 hours a day, may hurt your body. Creo showed a number of reasons Socrates had to escape Socrates. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo is that if Socrates does not run away, Socrates harms Creo in two ways. When Socrates dies, critics will lose good friends and critic's reputation will be hurt. People did not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison, they think they had the opportunity to let Socrates depart, but he did not do so because he did not intend to spend money . This gives Crito a high reputation with more money than a friend. This discussion considers only the impact of Socrates' actions on Creo. In Crito 's second argument, he inferred why Socrates did not want to run away. It is possible to pay salaries to people, but there is still doubt as to whether it is an ethical issue. What is Crito's request for Socrates?

The purpose of "critics" is to show the character of Socrates, not to be a philosopher, but to believe in the mission of God, to be unfairly condemned as a good citizen, to want to give up his life . We obey the laws of the country. The main argument that seems to require discussion between Creo and Socrates is the recognition of the fate of Socrates by most people. In "Crito" Socrates said: "Why should we care about most people's ideas?" (Plato 45) Socrates cares about the thought of most people I believe it should not be. In response to Chris' view, Socrates initially thought about why the opinion of most people is not the most important opinion. Second, what is the impact of escaping the city of Athens, and the third So, whether escape is cheating or not, as it will hurt Socrates' soul. If Creo does not help Socrates escape, what do they think? If Socrates is not responsible for his children, what do they think? Socrates believes that the opinions of experts are more important than the majority of opinions. He raised a well-trained example. Athletes do not pay attention to the general public's advice, but focus on their trainers. Taking steroids, eating whatever you want, listening to public opinion, such as training for 20 hours a day, may hurt your body. Creo showed a number of reasons Socrates had to escape Socrates. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo is that if Socrates does not run away, Socrates harms Creo in two ways. When Socrates dies, critics will lose good friends and critic's reputation will be hurt. People did not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison, they think they had the opportunity to let Socrates depart, but he did not do so because he did not intend to spend money . This gives Crito a high reputation with more money than a friend. This discussion considers only the impact of Socrates' actions on Creo. In Crito 's second argument, he inferred why Socrates did not want to run away. It is possible to pay salaries to people, but there is still doubt as to whether it is an ethical issue. What is Crito's request for Socrates?

Antigon and Socrates in the two protagonists, Antigon and Socrates 'Antigon and Crete' s plays showed completely different views on their responsibilities to their country. Antigone believes the sacred law and she will do what she thinks God wants her to do. On the other hand, Socrates thinks that he should abide by his law regardless of whether he thinks he is right or not. In Antigone, her brother Polynices opposed his city by attacking his brothers, and became king. Antigon vs. Cleon, Antigon vs Isman, Antigon v. Society, and Antigon vs. Myself, Antigon is in all confrontation. In all conflicts, feminism was shown to be contradictory, there was feminism between Antigon and Clion. I will not deny anything "(Sophocles Prologue 52). She did not hesitate; she completely believed all her nerves and did not care about the outcome. In conflict, antigone and society, Antigone showed feminism in front of all Thebes. "You are my father and the ruler of Thebes. You are now the king's last unlucky daughter, your king, I will make you die, you suffer." The law of Heaven "(Sophocles 74-79). When Antigone and Ismene conflicted, Antigone explained the plan to burial sister Ismene's brother, Ismene was disapproved but Antigone again showed feminism. In Antigone and Crito, the two protagonists, Antigone and Socrates, took a totally different view of their responsibility to the state. Antigone believes the sacred law and she will do what she thinks God wants her to do. On the other hand, Socrates thinks that he should abide by his law regardless of whether he thinks he is right or not. In Antigone, her brother Polynices opposed his city by attacking his brothers, and became king. Both brothers are dead this day. One was Eteocles who received the honor of the funeral, but the other did not receive Polynices. This decision was made by Antigone's Antioch Kryon and the current king of Thebes. Kryon said: "He has no tomb, no burial, no mourning for anyone, this is forbidden." (P. 432; p. 165) He also tried to fill him He announced that he will be executed.

Antigon and Socrates in the two protagonists, Antigon and Socrates 'Antigon and Crete' s plays showed completely different views on their responsibilities to their country. Antigone believes the sacred law and she will do what she thinks God wants her to do. On the other hand, Socrates thinks that he should abide by his law regardless of whether he thinks he is right or not. In Antigone, her brother Polynices opposed his city by attacking his brothers, and became king. Antigon vs. Cleon, Antigon vs Isman, Antigon v. Society, and Antigon vs. Myself, Antigon is in all confrontation. In all conflicts, feminism was shown to be contradictory, there was feminism between Antigon and Clion. I will not deny anything "(Sophocles Prologue 52). She did not hesitate; she completely believed all her nerves and did not care about the outcome. In conflict, antigone and society, Antigone showed feminism in front of all Thebes. "You are my father and the ruler of Thebes. You are now the king's last unlucky daughter, your king, I will make you die, you suffer." The law of Heaven "(Sophocles 74-79). When Antigone and Ismene conflicted, Antigone explained the plan to burial sister Ismene's brother, Ismene was disapproved but Antigone again showed feminism. In Antigone and Crito, the two protagonists, Antigone and Socrates, took a totally different view of their responsibility to the state. Antigone believes the sacred law and she will do what she thinks God wants her to do. On the other hand, Socrates thinks that he should abide by his law regardless of whether he thinks he is right or not. In Antigone, her brother Polynices opposed his city by attacking his brothers, and became king. Both brothers are dead this day. One was Eteocles who received the honor of the funeral, but the other did not receive Polynices. This decision was made by Antigone's Antioch Kryon and the current king of Thebes. Kryon said: "He has no tomb, no burial, no mourning for anyone, this is forbidden." (P. 432; p. 165) He also tried to fill him He announced that he will be executed.

Delphi god replied that no one is smart. Socrates certainly believes this is a kind of joke or riddle, he can not talk and talk about what Delphi said. Socrates decided to investigate a man thought to be wise to others or to him, but he was not smart, he just looked outside. The man who heard the news was angry with Socrates and opposed other people against Socrates. After that, Socrates moved from politicians to politicians, from poets to craftsmen 's poets, and they were less clever than Socrates. The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that Athens bound the philosophical teachings of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . Apologies are one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo", and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's oracle is not a wise person in Athens. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

Delphi god replied that no one is smart. Socrates certainly believes this is a kind of joke or riddle, he can not talk and talk about what Delphi said. Socrates decided to investigate a man thought to be wise to others or to him, but he was not smart, he just looked outside. The man who heard the news was angry with Socrates and opposed other people against Socrates. After that, Socrates moved from politicians to politicians, from poets to craftsmen 's poets, and they were less clever than Socrates. The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that Athens bound the philosophical teachings of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . Apologies are one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo", and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's oracle is not a wise person in Athens. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

The court is a ritualized space including clothing, language, space organization and so on. Therefore, the court constitutes the exercise of power. Discuss some ways in which courts express power and / or power relations. The court is a ceremonial space where many functions are effectively manipulated to prove to the individual the power of the state. It is for expressing this power that the court is often recognized as a judicial body to maintain social order. Electricity has continued for centuries. In ancient times there was a fight between power, the law of God, or the law of the courts. There were more jurisdiction over the penalty of fraud. The contradiction between apology and criticism is one of various views. In the apology, Socrates told the court that if he ordered him to stop philosophy he will not obey them. This proved to be inconsistent with Crito. Socrates said that he can not be punished before he dies, because it hurts the city of Athens. Externally, this seems to be easily classified as a contradiction. But as he studied the reading deeply, his reasoning became clear. Socrates does not respect the authority of Athens itself, but obeys the word of the Apollo God. The term "jurisdiction" is defined as the court's authority to hear litigation and make appropriate decisions. There are several different categories of jurisdiction. For example, within the jurisdiction of a person, it is the jurisdiction of someone. This means that the court has jurisdiction over someone when it is rooted. These roots include his residence, family, and even customers in that particular area. There are three types of jurisdiction that gives the court the authority to hear litigation. The authority to reconsider the constitutionality of the law may be limited by a parliament that has the authority to set the jurisdiction of the court. The only constitutional restrictions imposed by Congress on Congressional powers are related to the Supreme Court; the Supreme Court shall exercise appellate jurisdiction except in cases involving a foreign ambassador, minister or consular country I can only do. McCulloch v. Maryland decided to establish two important principles in 1819. One of them explained that the state can not take such action as to interfere with the effective constitutional exercise of the federal government. Another explanation is that Congress has an implicit power to carry out explicit power on the Constitution to establish a valid national government. All three branches of the US government have certain powers related to other government departments. One of the forces is called a clear force

The court is a ritualized space including clothing, language, space organization and so on. Therefore, the court constitutes the exercise of power. Discuss some ways in which courts express power and / or power relations. The court is a ceremonial space where many functions are effectively manipulated to prove to the individual the power of the state. It is for expressing this power that the court is often recognized as a judicial body to maintain social order. Electricity has continued for centuries. In ancient times there was a fight between power, the law of God, or the law of the courts. There were more jurisdiction over the penalty of fraud. The contradiction between apology and criticism is one of various views. In the apology, Socrates told the court that if he ordered him to stop philosophy he will not obey them. This proved to be inconsistent with Crito. Socrates said that he can not be punished before he dies, because it hurts the city of Athens. Externally, this seems to be easily classified as a contradiction. But as he studied the reading deeply, his reasoning became clear. Socrates does not respect the authority of Athens itself, but obeys the word of the Apollo God. The term "jurisdiction" is defined as the court's authority to hear litigation and make appropriate decisions. There are several different categories of jurisdiction. For example, within the jurisdiction of a person, it is the jurisdiction of someone. This means that the court has jurisdiction over someone when it is rooted. These roots include his residence, family, and even customers in that particular area. There are three types of jurisdiction that gives the court the authority to hear litigation. The authority to reconsider the constitutionality of the law may be limited by a parliament that has the authority to set the jurisdiction of the court. The only constitutional restrictions imposed by Congress on Congressional powers are related to the Supreme Court; the Supreme Court shall exercise appellate jurisdiction except in cases involving a foreign ambassador, minister or consular country I can only do. McCulloch v. Maryland decided to establish two important principles in 1819. One of them explained that the state can not take such action as to interfere with the effective constitutional exercise of the federal government. Another explanation is that Congress has an implicit power to carry out explicit power on the Constitution to establish a valid national government. All three branches of the US government have certain powers related to other government departments. One of the forces is called a clear force

Citizenship of Socrates is unthinkable in the paradox of rules and values, and Plato regards the enforcement of strict laws as "noble lies" (Rep 112). However, although it is a guarantor of order in a fair city, it is misleading and impossible. It is absolutely correct. Krito, apology and the republic grabbed Plato 's tense job at work between substantial justice and formal justice. In a real justice system, the rules are flexible and act as "efficiency standards" (Unger 90) synonymous with justice and virtue. With an apology, Socrates suggested a new citizenship that is opposed to traditional citizenship based on Homer 's poetry. Socrates is a philosophical citizen that relies on his own independent reason and judgment. Crito who speaks at Socrates 'prison thinks of citizen' s obedience, reverence, and responsibility for all citizens to respect and live under the law of the community. It is a tradition of Socrates' s poetry education presented by Socrates over a century. An apology indicates that Socrates provides a new citizenship model, a new type of citizenship. His challenge to the poet was to some extent the foundation of resentment against him, where Aristophanes and his so-called early accusers brought it. Indeed, Aristophanes and the poet take Socrates seriously, Aristophanes invests throughout the drama and wrote the complete drama about Socrates called the cloud. Laugh at Socrates' s major. Aristophanes 'plays are sometimes included in several versions of the book you are reading, just like in this version, Aristophanes' cloud version, and apology and criticism. For most people in Athens, Socrates is a talkative person, as most people are very practical. Playwright Aristophanes used Socrates as the subject of his play "clouds" and burned a meeting place of philosophers in the play. As everyone knows, Socrates is not politically active. He did not know the oligopolistic party who endorsed or supported Sparta with power at the end of the Peloponnesus War. But perhaps Socrates was involved with many aristocrats who favor the oligarchy who defeated Athens in the Peloponnese War, or because many of his students opposed democracy, some members of the democratic regime Let's suspicion. A leader of a new democratic regime arrested him

Citizenship of Socrates is unthinkable in the paradox of rules and values, and Plato regards the enforcement of strict laws as "noble lies" (Rep 112). However, although it is a guarantor of order in a fair city, it is misleading and impossible. It is absolutely correct. Krito, apology and the republic grabbed Plato 's tense job at work between substantial justice and formal justice. In a real justice system, the rules are flexible and act as "efficiency standards" (Unger 90) synonymous with justice and virtue. With an apology, Socrates suggested a new citizenship that is opposed to traditional citizenship based on Homer 's poetry. Socrates is a philosophical citizen that relies on his own independent reason and judgment. Crito who speaks at Socrates 'prison thinks of citizen' s obedience, reverence, and responsibility for all citizens to respect and live under the law of the community. It is a tradition of Socrates' s poetry education presented by Socrates over a century. An apology indicates that Socrates provides a new citizenship model, a new type of citizenship. His challenge to the poet was to some extent the foundation of resentment against him, where Aristophanes and his so-called early accusers brought it. Indeed, Aristophanes and the poet take Socrates seriously, Aristophanes invests throughout the drama and wrote the complete drama about Socrates called the cloud. Laugh at Socrates' s major. Aristophanes 'plays are sometimes included in several versions of the book you are reading, just like in this version, Aristophanes' cloud version, and apology and criticism. For most people in Athens, Socrates is a talkative person, as most people are very practical. Playwright Aristophanes used Socrates as the subject of his play "clouds" and burned a meeting place of philosophers in the play. As everyone knows, Socrates is not politically active. He did not know the oligopolistic party who endorsed or supported Sparta with power at the end of the Peloponnesus War. But perhaps Socrates was involved with many aristocrats who favor the oligarchy who defeated Athens in the Peloponnese War, or because many of his students opposed democracy, some members of the democratic regime Let's suspicion. A leader of a new democratic regime arrested him

In his essay "Desire and the Good of Human", Richard Kraut thinks that the desire to satisfy the typical defense, theory of pluralism is too weak; then Kraut provided his own alternative. In this article I will explain the theory of desire satisfaction because Claude opposes it and defends his opposition to Claude 's desire for satisfaction theory and evaluates his alternative theory. In ancient Greek philosophy such as Platonic, Aristotle, Stoic, foodies, and Medieval Christian philosophy it is always a narrow answer to say "What is the best thing in life?" Since Woozley's book is one of the major works on this subject, there are several answers to his dialogue research. Richard Kraut answered and thought that the interpretation of Uzuri's civil disobedience is too narrow, and he thought that Socrates would be far beyond what Uzli allowed. He thinks that before the law is enacted, he should focus on recognizing the challenges of existing legislation without focusing too much on existing legal issues. In addition, recognizing that Woozley mentioned the discussion to comply with the law proposed in Crito, Kraut used them as a way to allow Woozley to resist the citizen, but Kraut said Woozley had I conclude that he uses the word "pers u" in a way that is not clearly parallel to Athens' rhetoric and philosophy. Misunderstanding and misuse of Socrates: Analysis of contradiction between apology and criticism Martha Machevski McAlester College 3 Theme 1.1 See also Greek Research Center, Plato Seminar 100 b 21 - 3, Nicomachean Ethics Book VII. 1, 1145 b 4, Richard Kraut 4 (one of silly books sold last year at Barnes & Noble checkout ) This book is called "the meaning of life" Richard Taylor offers more serious and sensational defense against this view. Talking is very common, but many others are saying this, for example, Peter Singer uses his view on this wonderful life. 047943 Fellow of Prato and Cambridge Craut, Richard, Ed. It contains 14 new papers to discuss Plato's views on knowledge, reality, mathematics, politics, ethics, love, poetry, and religion. He also analyzed the knowledge and social background of his thoughts, the development of his philosophy in his career, the scope of alternative methods of his work, and the style of his writing. 560 pgs. In 1992, 135,134 people came to the end of the West. It is a rise in faith and a decline in rationality for the subsequent Christian influence on the Roman world and its subsequent radical development and the strong reassessment of Christianity and Western civilization. He established the influence of Christianity

In his essay "Desire and the Good of Human", Richard Kraut thinks that the desire to satisfy the typical defense, theory of pluralism is too weak; then Kraut provided his own alternative. In this article I will explain the theory of desire satisfaction because Claude opposes it and defends his opposition to Claude 's desire for satisfaction theory and evaluates his alternative theory. In ancient Greek philosophy such as Platonic, Aristotle, Stoic, foodies, and Medieval Christian philosophy it is always a narrow answer to say "What is the best thing in life?" Since Woozley's book is one of the major works on this subject, there are several answers to his dialogue research. Richard Kraut answered and thought that the interpretation of Uzuri's civil disobedience is too narrow, and he thought that Socrates would be far beyond what Uzli allowed. He thinks that before the law is enacted, he should focus on recognizing the challenges of existing legislation without focusing too much on existing legal issues. In addition, recognizing that Woozley mentioned the discussion to comply with the law proposed in Crito, Kraut used them as a way to allow Woozley to resist the citizen, but Kraut said Woozley had I conclude that he uses the word "pers u" in a way that is not clearly parallel to Athens' rhetoric and philosophy. Misunderstanding and misuse of Socrates: Analysis of contradiction between apology and criticism Martha Machevski McAlester College 3 Theme 1.1 See also Greek Research Center, Plato Seminar 100 b 21 - 3, Nicomachean Ethics Book VII. 1, 1145 b 4, Richard Kraut 4 (one of silly books sold last year at Barnes & Noble checkout ) This book is called "the meaning of life" Richard Taylor offers more serious and sensational defense against this view. Talking is very common, but many others are saying this, for example, Peter Singer uses his view on this wonderful life. 047943 Fellow of Prato and Cambridge Craut, Richard, Ed. It contains 14 new papers to discuss Plato's views on knowledge, reality, mathematics, politics, ethics, love, poetry, and religion. He also analyzed the knowledge and social background of his thoughts, the development of his philosophy in his career, the scope of alternative methods of his work, and the style of his writing. 560 pgs. In 1992, 135,134 people came to the end of the West. It is a rise in faith and a decline in rationality for the subsequent Christian influence on the Roman world and its subsequent radical development and the strong reassessment of Christianity and Western civilization. He established the influence of Christianity

In Plato's "Crito" article and Martin Luther King's "Birmingham Prison Letter", the two authors offered examples of whether the violation of the law was moral. The question we should answer in our last paper is whether we agree with the law on whether Socrates wants to escape and why to do so. I also asked how he saw Martin Luther King 's response to Athens' ruling. This article addresses these issues and outlines each article. We are morally obliged to obey even unfair laws. This ethical problem solves what we usually call civil disobedience. In order to discuss the disobedience of citizens properly and to discuss whether it is moral to violate the law, we must first explain the characteristics of citizens' disobedience. Peter Singer's "Practical Ethics" began expressing disobedience of citizens as "disagreement of moral opinion" and "even if the law protects and sanctions our completely wrong thing" By establishing an ethical responsibility that violates an unfair law, money makes it impossible to deny that civil disobedience is an important freedom. If freedom to pursue morality and pursuit of morality mean that the citizens do not comply, it is necessary to recognize that disobedience of citizens is necessary freedom. Of course, things are not that simple. Although the king's letter provides a viable reason for accepting civil disobedience, it is assumed that violations of unjust laws are moral. However, many writers and thinkers oppose this argument and their arguments must be solved if King's argument is accepted. People have moral responsibility to not obey unfair laws. • Martin Luther King Jr. Citizen's disobedience is defined as a peaceful political protest action, refusing to comply with certain laws or to impose fines (oxforddictionaries.com). Civil disobedience is a number of reasons for infinite protests, massive rebellion, countless rebellion, and revolution and rebellion all over the world, almost all of which are unfair and unfair government and its It is by rule. In many countries, the rights of citizens in the first place are considered illegal and illegal, but many people believe that disobedience of citizens represents the right of personal freedom of expression. Civil disobedience is a deliberate violation of law to promote ethical principles and change government policy. It may be limited to violation of certain laws deemed to be unfair, such as the civil rights movement of the United States in the 1960s. Alternatively, civil disobedience may include other law violations to raise fraud concerns, such as property damage, penalty or tax payment default, construction work and interference with illegal invasions. People who practice all kinds of civil disobedience are willing to accept the results of their actions as a means to promote their behavior. Henry David Thoreau first described the principle of civil disobedience in the article "On Responsibility for Civil Disobedience" in 1849. He believes that when conscience and law contradict, individuals have an obligation to promote justice by breaking the law.

In Plato's "Crito" article and Martin Luther King's "Birmingham Prison Letter", the two authors offered examples of whether the violation of the law was moral. The question we should answer in our last paper is whether we agree with the law on whether Socrates wants to escape and why to do so. I also asked how he saw Martin Luther King 's response to Athens' ruling. This article addresses these issues and outlines each article. We are morally obliged to obey even unfair laws. This ethical problem solves what we usually call civil disobedience. In order to discuss the disobedience of citizens properly and to discuss whether it is moral to violate the law, we must first explain the characteristics of citizens' disobedience. Peter Singer's "Practical Ethics" began expressing disobedience of citizens as "disagreement of moral opinion" and "even if the law protects and sanctions our completely wrong thing" By establishing an ethical responsibility that violates an unfair law, money makes it impossible to deny that civil disobedience is an important freedom. If freedom to pursue morality and pursuit of morality mean that the citizens do not comply, it is necessary to recognize that disobedience of citizens is necessary freedom. Of course, things are not that simple. Although the king's letter provides a viable reason for accepting civil disobedience, it is assumed that violations of unjust laws are moral. However, many writers and thinkers oppose this argument and their arguments must be solved if King's argument is accepted. People have moral responsibility to not obey unfair laws. • Martin Luther King Jr. Citizen's disobedience is defined as a peaceful political protest action, refusing to comply with certain laws or to impose fines (oxforddictionaries.com). Civil disobedience is a number of reasons for infinite protests, massive rebellion, countless rebellion, and revolution and rebellion all over the world, almost all of which are unfair and unfair government and its It is by rule. In many countries, the rights of citizens in the first place are considered illegal and illegal, but many people believe that disobedience of citizens represents the right of personal freedom of expression. Civil disobedience is a deliberate violation of law to promote ethical principles and change government policy. It may be limited to violation of certain laws deemed to be unfair, such as the civil rights movement of the United States in the 1960s. Alternatively, civil disobedience may include other law violations to raise fraud concerns, such as property damage, penalty or tax payment default, construction work and interference with illegal invasions. People who practice all kinds of civil disobedience are willing to accept the results of their actions as a means to promote their behavior. Henry David Thoreau first described the principle of civil disobedience in the article "On Responsibility for Civil Disobedience" in 1849. He believes that when conscience and law contradict, individuals have an obligation to promote justice by breaking the law.

Socrates and his evasion of each of us are accused of taking some action in certain aspects of our lives. But these accusations are very wrong, and from time to time people can do very few things to solve the problem. In this case, we are talking about a great philosopher Socrates, a man with many beliefs and thoughts. He is a man who believes in justice and gives justice to others. We study Socrates' thought and his rationality in health and logical thinking. On the eve of the day Socrates was executed, Christ 's dialogue was a dialogue between Socrates and his friend Christos. Creo wants to help Socrates escape the death penalty and escape from Athens, but Socrates claims to claim that Christos is important to defend the death penalty and succeeds. Through this dialogue, Socrates detailed his views on the symbiotic relationship between justice, individuals and the state (more specifically national legislation). Creo proposed Socrates to try to persuade escape. The majority of Socrates' objections concern the city state and justice, and the consequences of the Hereafter in the Hereafter. Introduction Socrates criticized him as not to evade the death penalty. Cleo was puzzled about Socrates' inference, and Cleo and his friends were able to persuade him to escape as they were able to offer ransom to security guards. If it is not for himself, Socrates should escape for his friend, son and those who benefit from his teachings. The views of Socrates and Crete start from this point. By the way, I still believe it In this article we evaluate Creo's assertion about why Socrates is to escape from prison and Socrates's assertion as to whether he remains in prison and accepts his death sentence. I think that Socrates has more powerful arguments. First of all, I will first consider Crito's claims and show their strengths and weaknesses. Then I will list the discussions of Socrates and show their strengths and weaknesses. Although I am going to introduce all the points of Socrates, I pay special attention to his main argument, but the basis of this assertion is that unfair behavior hurts the heart of men and life is in the soul of destruction It is not worth living. Creo mentioned three reasons Socrates should flee. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo was that if Socrates did not run away it would harm Creo in two ways. On the other hand, when Socrates dies, Creo loses a good friend, and on the other hand Creo's reputation is hurt. People will not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison. They would think that Creo might let Socrates depart, but he did not do it because he did not want to spend money. As a result, Creto gained a reputation that he spends more money than his friends. In this discussion, Creo believes it is a bad thing to do something that hurts a friend (Crito, 44b - c, Grube trans. Other places). This discussion is very narrow. It only takes into account the impact of Socratic behavior on Creo. Socrates later proposed these two points.

Socrates and his evasion of each of us are accused of taking some action in certain aspects of our lives. But these accusations are very wrong, and from time to time people can do very few things to solve the problem. In this case, we are talking about a great philosopher Socrates, a man with many beliefs and thoughts. He is a man who believes in justice and gives justice to others. We study Socrates' thought and his rationality in health and logical thinking. On the eve of the day Socrates was executed, Christ 's dialogue was a dialogue between Socrates and his friend Christos. Creo wants to help Socrates escape the death penalty and escape from Athens, but Socrates claims to claim that Christos is important to defend the death penalty and succeeds. Through this dialogue, Socrates detailed his views on the symbiotic relationship between justice, individuals and the state (more specifically national legislation). Creo proposed Socrates to try to persuade escape. The majority of Socrates' objections concern the city state and justice, and the consequences of the Hereafter in the Hereafter. Introduction Socrates criticized him as not to evade the death penalty. Cleo was puzzled about Socrates' inference, and Cleo and his friends were able to persuade him to escape as they were able to offer ransom to security guards. If it is not for himself, Socrates should escape for his friend, son and those who benefit from his teachings. The views of Socrates and Crete start from this point. By the way, I still believe it In this article we evaluate Creo's assertion about why Socrates is to escape from prison and Socrates's assertion as to whether he remains in prison and accepts his death sentence. I think that Socrates has more powerful arguments. First of all, I will first consider Crito's claims and show their strengths and weaknesses. Then I will list the discussions of Socrates and show their strengths and weaknesses. Although I am going to introduce all the points of Socrates, I pay special attention to his main argument, but the basis of this assertion is that unfair behavior hurts the heart of men and life is in the soul of destruction It is not worth living. Creo mentioned three reasons Socrates should flee. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo was that if Socrates did not run away it would harm Creo in two ways. On the other hand, when Socrates dies, Creo loses a good friend, and on the other hand Creo's reputation is hurt. People will not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison. They would think that Creo might let Socrates depart, but he did not do it because he did not want to spend money. As a result, Creto gained a reputation that he spends more money than his friends. In this discussion, Creo believes it is a bad thing to do something that hurts a friend (Crito, 44b - c, Grube trans. Other places). This discussion is very narrow. It only takes into account the impact of Socratic behavior on Creo. Socrates later proposed these two points.

Most writers suffer from controversy through their career. Some people were persecuted when there was not much enlightenment like Mark Twain, others were laughed at reports like Edgar Allan Poe. But Salman Rushdie became the first author of the free world because the foreign government was sentenced to death and forced to hide from the entire continent. To say that Salman Rushdie is a very controversial writer in today's society will be a severe and unobtrusive expression. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. In February 1994, Ayatollah Khomeini talked about the poetry of Rashidi and Fatwa and Satan in commemoration of the 5th anniversary of fatwa of the French TV network Alte who gave Salman Rushdie one night of the show. . In the interview, Rushdie strongly supported the idea that religious texts must be treated as other types of text - they do not have a privileged position to ban questions. "There is no other rule about religious sentences," he said. "They should face competition in other texts only." In this statement, Rashidi pointed out the basis of the problem which is the answer to the publication of his novel. The Bible is usually given a privileged position in society, but for some people it is a perfect, undoubted, absolute existence. However, these texts are mediated by people who always have the privilege of being an interpreter. Re-examine the devil's scriptures: Removal of the original Quran text as mutual texts of Rush

Most writers suffer from controversy through their career. Some people were persecuted when there was not much enlightenment like Mark Twain, others were laughed at reports like Edgar Allan Poe. But Salman Rushdie became the first author of the free world because the foreign government was sentenced to death and forced to hide from the entire continent. To say that Salman Rushdie is a very controversial writer in today's society will be a severe and unobtrusive expression. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. In February 1994, Ayatollah Khomeini talked about the poetry of Rashidi and Fatwa and Satan in commemoration of the 5th anniversary of fatwa of the French TV network Alte who gave Salman Rushdie one night of the show. . In the interview, Rushdie strongly supported the idea that religious texts must be treated as other types of text - they do not have a privileged position to ban questions. "There is no other rule about religious sentences," he said. "They should face competition in other texts only." In this statement, Rashidi pointed out the basis of the problem which is the answer to the publication of his novel. The Bible is usually given a privileged position in society, but for some people it is a perfect, undoubted, absolute existence. However, these texts are mediated by people who always have the privilege of being an interpreter. Re-examine the devil's scriptures: Removal of the original Quran text as mutual texts of Rush

An apology is the defense of Socrates in trial. Socrates pointed out that when the dialog began, his accuser warned the jury about the eloquence of Socrates, and Socrates said that the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates tells the truth It was said that it was. Socrates distinguishes between two groups of accusers: early complaints and late accusers. Since they did not appear in the courtroom, the early group was the most difficult to defend. He was accused of being a boss: he was a teacher and gathered money for his teachings. In class, we talked about the apology of Plato: Socrates, which was the previous mission. Reading is "apology" of Socrates, but this is not a real apology. In the class we talked about the truth of the apology. Our real apology idea is to insist that Socrates have sarcastic inner consciousness or guardian insight into Socrates. He also regards himself as a tool of the gods and they teach them the true ignorance of them. He also said that he knows that he is smarter than him and that he is the only one who knows his ignorance Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. According to Plato 's apology Socrates began his life as "bullish" in Athens his friend Chaerephon asked Delphi whether someone is smarter than Socrates; Oracle said that no one is smarter. Socrates believed that Oracle's reaction was wrong because he thought he had no wisdom. Then he seduced a mystery by approaching Athenian politicians, poets and craftsmen. However, Socrates questioned this: Everyone thinks he is smart with knowing much, but in reality they do not know very little and they are not at all smart. Socrates has recognized that Oracle is right; the so-called wise men think he is intelligent but not so, but he himself knows that he is not smart. To an ignorant person

An apology is the defense of Socrates in trial. Socrates pointed out that when the dialog began, his accuser warned the jury about the eloquence of Socrates, and Socrates said that the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates tells the truth It was said that it was. Socrates distinguishes between two groups of accusers: early complaints and late accusers. Since they did not appear in the courtroom, the early group was the most difficult to defend. He was accused of being a boss: he was a teacher and gathered money for his teachings. In class, we talked about the apology of Plato: Socrates, which was the previous mission. Reading is "apology" of Socrates, but this is not a real apology. In the class we talked about the truth of the apology. Our real apology idea is to insist that Socrates have sarcastic inner consciousness or guardian insight into Socrates. He also regards himself as a tool of the gods and they teach them the true ignorance of them. He also said that he knows that he is smarter than him and that he is the only one who knows his ignorance Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. According to Plato 's apology Socrates began his life as "bullish" in Athens his friend Chaerephon asked Delphi whether someone is smarter than Socrates; Oracle said that no one is smarter. Socrates believed that Oracle's reaction was wrong because he thought he had no wisdom. Then he seduced a mystery by approaching Athenian politicians, poets and craftsmen. However, Socrates questioned this: Everyone thinks he is smart with knowing much, but in reality they do not know very little and they are not at all smart. Socrates has recognized that Oracle is right; the so-called wise men think he is intelligent but not so, but he himself knows that he is not smart. To an ignorant person

When discussing controversial Indian literary writers, someone else should consider their names. Salman Rushdie, the most famous work is "Midnights Children". The first two chapters of "Midnight Children" are called "perforated sheets". In "The Perforated Sheet", Rushdie uses magical realism as a tool of literature and links it with India, which constantly changes the main events and the influence it has on the life of the Salim family. Indeed, at the beginning of the story, when he was introduced to Salem, the reader first contacted Rushdie using magical realism. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. When discussing controversial Indian literary writers, someone else should consider their names. Salman Rushdie, the most famous work is "Midnights Children". The first two chapters of "Midnight Children" are called "perforated sheets". In "The Perforated Sheet", Rushdie uses magical realism as a tool of literature and links it with India, which constantly changes the main events and the influence it has on the life of the Salim family. - The two love-themed poems I chose were Porphyrias Lover of Robert Browning and Stop All The Clocks of W. H Auden. Comparison of the two love poems The two love-themed poems I chose were Robert Browning's "Porphyria's Lover" and W. H Auden's "Stop All The Clocks". "Lovers of Porphyria" was a dramatic monologue that was regarded as entertainment in the Victorian era, originally a spectator's performance. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

When discussing controversial Indian literary writers, someone else should consider their names. Salman Rushdie, the most famous work is "Midnights Children". The first two chapters of "Midnight Children" are called "perforated sheets". In "The Perforated Sheet", Rushdie uses magical realism as a tool of literature and links it with India, which constantly changes the main events and the influence it has on the life of the Salim family. Indeed, at the beginning of the story, when he was introduced to Salem, the reader first contacted Rushdie using magical realism. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. When discussing controversial Indian literary writers, someone else should consider their names. Salman Rushdie, the most famous work is "Midnights Children". The first two chapters of "Midnight Children" are called "perforated sheets". In "The Perforated Sheet", Rushdie uses magical realism as a tool of literature and links it with India, which constantly changes the main events and the influence it has on the life of the Salim family. - The two love-themed poems I chose were Porphyrias Lover of Robert Browning and Stop All The Clocks of W. H Auden. Comparison of the two love poems The two love-themed poems I chose were Robert Browning's "Porphyria's Lover" and W. H Auden's "Stop All The Clocks". "Lovers of Porphyria" was a dramatic monologue that was regarded as entertainment in the Victorian era, originally a spectator's performance. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

Although the expression "fact, non verb" is well known, actions are allowed to be defended by their words and acts. A persuasive speech stands out in 'Crito', and it is also posted in another article 'Oedipus Rex' almost at the same time. These works of Plato and Sophocles have undoubted similarity; in both of them, the way the Master attempts to defend their behavior uses neither sacredness Support said and guarantee the kindness of their behavior and assumptions. Book Log - In the Sophocles' Oedipus Rex drama, Oedipus, the main character of Oedipus Rex, faces many conflicts both inside and outside, leading to a terrible tragedy. When the famous blind prophet Tiresias told Oedipus that it was the cause of the plague attacking Thebes, the main confrontation took place. Then this conflict led to the desire of Oedipus to find out who his parents are. - Even before someone is born, that person's destiny is decided. That person will do what changes will be made or what will be done to ensure that people around the people do not fulfill their destiny. In Sophocles' book King Oedipus, the role of ODP needs to address this precise situation. Prior to the birth of Oedipus, his parents accepted the incredible prediction that they said that their children grew and stated that they killed his father and had his mother and children. In Sophocles' "Oedipus King", an ironic theme plays an important role in the whole play. In the play, Oedipus Rex believes that you can avoid fate if you leave Corinth. God said Oedipus will kill his father and will have children with his mother. Eventually, he murdered his father in a casual gathering without knowing him, and married his mother. Edips is still helpless, and Oracle's forecast is ripe. - Ironic means "a discrepancy (Merriam - Webster) between the actual result of a series of events and normal or expected results. In fact, the opposite is true. Ironic can be specified as a more dramatic or tragic satire.

Although the expression "fact, non verb" is well known, actions are allowed to be defended by their words and acts. A persuasive speech stands out in 'Crito', and it is also posted in another article 'Oedipus Rex' almost at the same time. These works of Plato and Sophocles have undoubted similarity; in both of them, the way the Master attempts to defend their behavior uses neither sacredness Support said and guarantee the kindness of their behavior and assumptions. Book Log - In the Sophocles' Oedipus Rex drama, Oedipus, the main character of Oedipus Rex, faces many conflicts both inside and outside, leading to a terrible tragedy. When the famous blind prophet Tiresias told Oedipus that it was the cause of the plague attacking Thebes, the main confrontation took place. Then this conflict led to the desire of Oedipus to find out who his parents are. - Even before someone is born, that person's destiny is decided. That person will do what changes will be made or what will be done to ensure that people around the people do not fulfill their destiny. In Sophocles' book King Oedipus, the role of ODP needs to address this precise situation. Prior to the birth of Oedipus, his parents accepted the incredible prediction that they said that their children grew and stated that they killed his father and had his mother and children. In Sophocles' "Oedipus King", an ironic theme plays an important role in the whole play. In the play, Oedipus Rex believes that you can avoid fate if you leave Corinth. God said Oedipus will kill his father and will have children with his mother. Eventually, he murdered his father in a casual gathering without knowing him, and married his mother. Edips is still helpless, and Oracle's forecast is ripe. - Ironic means "a discrepancy (Merriam - Webster) between the actual result of a series of events and normal or expected results. In fact, the opposite is true. Ironic can be specified as a more dramatic or tragic satire.

Most writers suffer from controversy through their career. Some people were persecuted when there was not much enlightenment like Mark Twain, others were laughed at reports like Edgar Allan Poe. But Salman Rushdie became the first author of the free world because the foreign government was sentenced to death and forced to hide from the entire continent. To say that Salman Rushdie is a very controversial writer in today's society will be a severe and unobtrusive expression. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. In February 1994, Ayatollah Khomeini talked about the poetry of Rashidi and Fatwa and Satan in commemoration of the 5th anniversary of fatwa of the French TV network Alte who gave Salman Rushdie one night of the show. . In the interview, Rushdie strongly supported the idea that religious texts must be treated as other types of text - they do not have a privileged position to ban questions. "There is no other rule about religious sentences," he said. "They should face competition in other texts only." In this statement, Rashidi pointed out the basis of the problem which is the answer to the publication of his novel. The Bible is usually given a privileged position in society, but for some people it is a perfect, undoubted, absolute existence. However, these texts are mediated by people who always have the privilege of being an interpreter. Re-examine the devil's scriptures: Removal of the original Quran text as mutual texts of Rush

Most writers suffer from controversy through their career. Some people were persecuted when there was not much enlightenment like Mark Twain, others were laughed at reports like Edgar Allan Poe. But Salman Rushdie became the first author of the free world because the foreign government was sentenced to death and forced to hide from the entire continent. To say that Salman Rushdie is a very controversial writer in today's society will be a severe and unobtrusive expression. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. In February 1994, Ayatollah Khomeini talked about the poetry of Rashidi and Fatwa and Satan in commemoration of the 5th anniversary of fatwa of the French TV network Alte who gave Salman Rushdie one night of the show. . In the interview, Rushdie strongly supported the idea that religious texts must be treated as other types of text - they do not have a privileged position to ban questions. "There is no other rule about religious sentences," he said. "They should face competition in other texts only." In this statement, Rashidi pointed out the basis of the problem which is the answer to the publication of his novel. The Bible is usually given a privileged position in society, but for some people it is a perfect, undoubted, absolute existence. However, these texts are mediated by people who always have the privilege of being an interpreter. Re-examine the devil's scriptures: Removal of the original Quran text as mutual texts of Rush

Rashidi agreed with this view and said, "Over the years, when they turned their bodies into screams of God's bombs and victims, the air was filled with the sound of believers' battle." It is 5 billion. Between 1981 and 2006, there were 1,200 suicide attacks in the world. According to the analysis of Finland's terrorist database of Flinders, politics is not just a religious frenzy, so terrorists become self-destructive. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Many scholars may not agree with the sea of ​​stories unrelated to Fatwa with the author of Harold of Salman Rushdie, but I think that a book for this children is a good way to understand Islamic culture . The sea of ​​Haroun and the story reflects the author's avoidance of Fatwa time, and the relationship between political figures and religious figures. Rashid Khalifa and Salman Rushdie are threatened by fiction and reality; they are just trying to regain their identity. During the police protection period he published a book for children for Haroun and the Sea of ​​Stories in 1990. "The story of Rushdie and Rashid Khalifa is written by Rushdie when he was forced to exile, and it is telling the story composed of freedom of writers" (Sen). Rashidi pointed out that Satan's poetry is the wrong word of the devil that Muhammad told as part of the Quran. Many Muslims say this is God, and Rashidi insists that the Qur'an is the work of the devil.

Rashidi agreed with this view and said, "Over the years, when they turned their bodies into screams of God's bombs and victims, the air was filled with the sound of believers' battle." It is 5 billion. Between 1981 and 2006, there were 1,200 suicide attacks in the world. According to the analysis of Finland's terrorist database of Flinders, politics is not just a religious frenzy, so terrorists become self-destructive. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Many scholars may not agree with the sea of ​​stories unrelated to Fatwa with the author of Harold of Salman Rushdie, but I think that a book for this children is a good way to understand Islamic culture . The sea of ​​Haroun and the story reflects the author's avoidance of Fatwa time, and the relationship between political figures and religious figures. Rashid Khalifa and Salman Rushdie are threatened by fiction and reality; they are just trying to regain their identity. During the police protection period he published a book for children for Haroun and the Sea of ​​Stories in 1990. "The story of Rushdie and Rashid Khalifa is written by Rushdie when he was forced to exile, and it is telling the story composed of freedom of writers" (Sen). Rashidi pointed out that Satan's poetry is the wrong word of the devil that Muhammad told as part of the Quran. Many Muslims say this is God, and Rashidi insists that the Qur'an is the work of the devil.

About Euthyphro: Notes of Sidney Fein He said that when he was young, Rabbi Israel studied 800 Kabala books. But when he first saw Mezritch 's plaid facing face to face, he knew that he soon did not know anything. I have a mentoring version of Plato's wonderful dialogue translated by W. H. D. Rouse, a university textbook for my daughter on my desk. It costs 4.95 dollars. This is a very good book with convenient footnotes and minimal academic barriers. Editors include six conversations: Ion, Meno, Symposium, Republic, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Saoterte met Yutiflo outside the court of the kingdom governor and did not believe the prosecution of his father's murder by Ytiflo was justified or pious after hearing what Yutiflo was there. He asked Euthyphro to teach him that he is religious and not religious to himself as he can see himself that Euthyphro is a pious act against his father. Then this started a core discussion - a rigorous discussion of faith and rude. Euthyphro tried to explain Socrates' dedication and willingness by first giving his example. He said, "The devout thing is to do what I am doing now to prosecute criminals, such as murder and temple robbery, as your father is your mother or someone else "(5e) Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith)

About Euthyphro: Notes of Sidney Fein He said that when he was young, Rabbi Israel studied 800 Kabala books. But when he first saw Mezritch 's plaid facing face to face, he knew that he soon did not know anything. I have a mentoring version of Plato's wonderful dialogue translated by W. H. D. Rouse, a university textbook for my daughter on my desk. It costs 4.95 dollars. This is a very good book with convenient footnotes and minimal academic barriers. Editors include six conversations: Ion, Meno, Symposium, Republic, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo. In Plato 's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates coincidentally met a man named Euthyphro in front of the court. When Socrates asked what he was there, Euthyphro replied that he was appealing his father for his murder. He has a relationship with his father and his family, Euthyphro explained that he must do the right thing. However, many years ago, when the singer was discovered that he himself faced with his mother's Alzheimer's disease, he was upset from (he says) his indomitable principle. He hired a nursing team to take care of her. Obviously, he can not provide the same service to all other Alzheimer's patients in the world. The singer acknowledges that this is Saoterte met Yutiflo outside the court of the kingdom governor and did not believe the prosecution of his father's murder by Ytiflo was justified or pious after hearing what Yutiflo was there. He asked Euthyphro to teach him that he is religious and not religious to himself as he can see himself that Euthyphro is a pious act against his father. Then this started a core discussion - a rigorous discussion of faith and rude. Euthyphro tried to explain Socrates' dedication and willingness by first giving his example. He said, "The devout thing is to do what I am doing now to prosecute criminals, such as murder and temple robbery, as your father is your mother or someone else "(5e) Socrates used a devout entity to analyze the whole behavior of Euthyphro. Dedication is defined in the body as a specific action in the Bible that is gentle, comfortable, focused and fair. Euthyphro said he was complaining of his father because he thought that action was godly. The definition of Shinto (sacredness, kindness, acceptance of God, attention and justice) was discussed between the two. Socrates demands not only certain actions that reflect faith, but also the whole entity of religion. He began to destroy, found Euthyphro's assertions in various places and urged Euthyphro to explain whether he had changed his father reverently (definition of faith)

The most prominent thing about women in apology of Socrates against Socrates is that they lack what we might expect. Only two specific women were mentioned: 1) Apollo's shrine maiden Pythia (2) The mother of Thetis, Achilles (himself) named after himself, who answered Chaerephon's question that nobody is wiser than Socrates (21a) Although it is not mentioned, it is only known as "the son of Thetis"), he warned him that he would die if he killed Trojan hero Hector (28c). The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that the Athenians combined the philosophical teaching of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

The most prominent thing about women in apology of Socrates against Socrates is that they lack what we might expect. Only two specific women were mentioned: 1) Apollo's shrine maiden Pythia (2) The mother of Thetis, Achilles (himself) named after himself, who answered Chaerephon's question that nobody is wiser than Socrates (21a) Although it is not mentioned, it is only known as "the son of Thetis"), he warned him that he would die if he killed Trojan hero Hector (28c). The main existing sources of information on the history of Socrates' trial and enforcement are as follows. Apology for Socrates 'jury, historian Xenophon, and Socrates, Socrates, Plato, Socrates' s bottommost epic, Creto and Fado, which is a student of Socrates. In "Socrates' s indictment" (392 B.C.), a sophisticated rhetoricist Polyclauteus (440-370) filed a lawsuit brought by Anthutas, which accused Socrates of BC 403 BC political and religious Activity. The main sources of Socrates 'trial and enforcement are the Apologetics of Plato' s Socrates and the apology of Xenophon of Athens to Socrates who was his student, the contemporary interpretation includes the journalist IF Stone's "Socrates" The "judgment" (1988) that was being held and the classic scholar Socrates died Robin Waterfield: the elimination of myth (2009). Before philosopher Socrates was judged moral corruption and reverence, the citizens of Athens thought that he was an intellectual and moral person in their society. In the comic book "Cloud" (423 BC), Aristophanes teaches Socrates as a sophisticated philosopher and teaches how to discuss the beating of his father to the young people. Socrates denied the relationship with Sophist, but the playwright showed that the Athenians combined the philosophical teaching of Socrates with Sophism. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him.

Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. At the center of this discussion is Sokrateth 's relativeness always found in Athens, which is reflected in the choice that Socrates will stay in Athens for the majority of his time. The innocent aim of Socrates is to explore the death of Socrates and reasonably support the jury of the Socrates trial in the judgment of the death penalty. One of the main arguments against Socrates in his trial was "rude". This assertion concretely states that Socrates ignored the gods of the accepted city and introduced the new gods. "Ignore the spirit of the masses" may refer to Socrates' individualism Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. - When I read Plato's apology, I began to get lost, but as I started reading it I began to understand it. He has been condemned not to acknowledge the gods accepted by the state for his life, and the corrupted youth. When he was not tried his speech was an apology that did not acknowledge the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. It is a very simple dialogue method. With the main sources of trial and death of the philosopher Socrates (BC 469-399 BC), Socrates apologize, with trial, one of four dialogues of Socrates, Euthyphro, Phaedo, Crito, Plato is a philosopher I detailed the last days of Socrates. The apology of the philosopher Plato (Socrates 429-347) to Socrates is one of many interpretive apologies to Socrates's corruption and the defense of defamation legal defense and most apologies are after the Socrates trial. It was released in 399 BC. Therefore, Plato 's Socrates is the defense of Socrates' early philosophy presented in the form of Socrates' dialogue. Aristotle later classified it as a new type, but still a useful historical source for Socratic philosophers (469-399 BC).

Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. At the center of this discussion is Sokrateth 's relativeness always found in Athens, which is reflected in the choice that Socrates will stay in Athens for the majority of his time. The innocent aim of Socrates is to explore the death of Socrates and reasonably support the jury of the Socrates trial in the judgment of the death penalty. One of the main arguments against Socrates in his trial was "rude". This assertion concretely states that Socrates ignored the gods of the accepted city and introduced the new gods. "Ignore the spirit of the masses" may refer to Socrates' individualism Incorrect hypothesis in Socrates's trial and death In Plato's criticism, Socrates explained to his old friend Krito why he refuses to escape executions. One of the tools Socrates used to convince Creo that his decision was justice was a hypothetical discussion about the states and laws of Athens. - When I read Plato's apology, I began to get lost, but as I started reading it I began to understand it. He has been condemned not to acknowledge the gods accepted by the state for his life, and the corrupted youth. When he was not tried his speech was an apology that did not acknowledge the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. It is a very simple dialogue method. With the main sources of trial and death of the philosopher Socrates (BC 469-399 BC), Socrates apologize, with trial, one of four dialogues of Socrates, Euthyphro, Phaedo, Crito, Plato is a philosopher I detailed the last days of Socrates. The apology of the philosopher Plato (Socrates 429-347) to Socrates is one of many interpretive apologies to Socrates's corruption and the defense of defamation legal defense and most apologies are after the Socrates trial. It was released in 399 BC. Therefore, Plato 's Socrates is the defense of Socrates' early philosophy presented in the form of Socrates' dialogue. Aristotle later classified it as a new type, but still a useful historical source for Socratic philosophers (469-399 BC).

Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan's Poetry Rushdie" is talking about two people, Saladin Chamcha and Gibbrell Farris. Throughout the novel, Gibrell has a strong dream, and the narrator suggests the theme of Satan's poetry. Satan's poetry is said to be part of the Qur'an that was invalidated after Muhammad said. It is said that the poet said that Allah is not the only god, there are three slightly smaller goddesses. The controversy of Satan's poetry, also known as Rushdie Incident, is a severely fierce Muslim fight against the publication of Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan Psalm", first published in the UK in 1988, partially inspired by Muhammad It is a reaction. In 1989, Iran's Ayholollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa who ordered Muslims to kill Rushdie. Muhammad made numerous killings of this novel to kill and explode. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan's Poetry Rushdie" is talking about two people, Saladin Chamcha and Gibbrell Farris. Throughout the novel, Gibrell has a strong dream, and the narrator suggests the theme of Satan's poetry. Satan's poetry is said to be part of the Qur'an that was invalidated after Muhammad said. It is said that the poet said that Allah is not the only god, there are three slightly smaller goddesses. The controversy of Satan's poetry, also known as Rushdie Incident, is a severely fierce Muslim fight against the publication of Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan Psalm", first published in the UK in 1988, partially inspired by Muhammad It is a reaction. In 1989, Iran's Ayholollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa who ordered Muslims to kill Rushdie. Muhammad made numerous killings of this novel to kill and explode. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. Because Islam prophets and Salman Rashidi opposed to the Koran are known. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. 117 11 17 11 17 117 117 117 117 117 117 117 Salsal salsal salsal salsal salsal new sophisticated salsal salsal new new novelty new novelty novel new novelty new novel new novel new novel new novelty novel novel novel novel novel novel novel fiction novel RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Betrayal of my son, and Renaissance Florence, Niccolò Machiavelli study really brutal power. 368 pgs. • 2009 028142 Kinbiku Borges, 17 works Jorge Lewis Book shows the great power of any of the greatest writers of the century imagination, intellect and style. Borges introduces us to an impressive singular and deep resonance field, we enter abyss of terror pascal, ie book calligraphy and text maze realm.

Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. Because Islam prophets and Salman Rashidi opposed to the Koran are known. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. 117 11 17 11 17 117 117 117 117 117 117 117 Salsal salsal salsal salsal salsal new sophisticated salsal salsal new new novelty new novelty novel new novelty new novel new novel new novel new novelty novel novel novel novel novel novel novel fiction novel RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Betrayal of my son, and Renaissance Florence, Niccolò Machiavelli study really brutal power. 368 pgs. • 2009 028142 Kinbiku Borges, 17 works Jorge Lewis Book shows the great power of any of the greatest writers of the century imagination, intellect and style. Borges introduces us to an impressive singular and deep resonance field, we enter abyss of terror pascal, ie book calligraphy and text maze realm.

Power has been on for centuries. In ancient times there was a struggle between power, the law of God, or the law of the courts, which had more jurisdiction in punishing wrongdoing. The contradiction between apology and criticism is one of various views. In the apology, Socrates told the court that if he ordered him to stop philosophy he will not obey them. This proved to be inconsistent with Crito. Socrates said he could not escape the imprisonment before he died, because it hurts the city of Athens. On the outside, this seems to be easily classified as a contradiction. But when he studied the reading deeply, his reasoning became apparent. Socrates does not respect the authority of Athens itself, but obeys the word of the Apollo God. In apology, Socrates says to God that no one is smarter than him. Socrates does not consciously anger the people of Athens. He tried to understand what the gods saw only. "... ... As I believe that living the life of the philosopher and considering myself and others, when God ordered me, I will be aware of my death I abandoned the position, I think that I do not believe in God, do not obey God, fear of death, I think that it is wise when it is not so, I may come here "apologize 29 Ab ) Initially, Socrates clearly pointed out to the court that these were what he believed. When he doubts God's faith, he has no time. This was tried when Meritus was paradoxical during Socrates' s interrogation. Formal claims are not religious, it is fraud for young people. Secondly, if Socrates does not obey the gods it is a good reason. In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted young people. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. An apology written by Plato was a defense speech by Socrates in trial. In the last article Socrates explained why he would stop practicing philosophy and die instead of living without virtue. In this place, Socrates received a conviction and sentenced the death penalty. According to Athens' court system, Socrates must propose another penalty and 500 juries must decide both. Socrates originally suggested that he should not be punished, but should enjoy nationwide meals free of charge. As soon as they sentenced him to death, this proposition must have provoked many juries. Almost all of Plato's work is after Socrates' trial and enforcement. Plato showed interest from politics early, but the death sentence of Socrates and the disillusionment of the oligarch known as the "30 tyrant" seems to have led Plato to philosophical thought and writing life. (Plato is usually closely related to the dominant signal of the eight tyrants' eight months of tyranny, because his mother Uncle Christiania played an important role in the government, and his mother's brother Chaminus Oligocentricism carried out a widespread execution of political opponents, confiscating wealthy Athenian wealth.

Power has been on for centuries. In ancient times there was a struggle between power, the law of God, or the law of the courts, which had more jurisdiction in punishing wrongdoing. The contradiction between apology and criticism is one of various views. In the apology, Socrates told the court that if he ordered him to stop philosophy he will not obey them. This proved to be inconsistent with Crito. Socrates said he could not escape the imprisonment before he died, because it hurts the city of Athens. On the outside, this seems to be easily classified as a contradiction. But when he studied the reading deeply, his reasoning became apparent. Socrates does not respect the authority of Athens itself, but obeys the word of the Apollo God. In apology, Socrates says to God that no one is smarter than him. Socrates does not consciously anger the people of Athens. He tried to understand what the gods saw only. "... ... As I believe that living the life of the philosopher and considering myself and others, when God ordered me, I will be aware of my death I abandoned the position, I think that I do not believe in God, do not obey God, fear of death, I think that it is wise when it is not so, I may come here "apologize 29 Ab ) Initially, Socrates clearly pointed out to the court that these were what he believed. When he doubts God's faith, he has no time. This was tried when Meritus was paradoxical during Socrates' s interrogation. Formal claims are not religious, it is fraud for young people. Secondly, if Socrates does not obey the gods it is a good reason. In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted young people. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. An apology written by Plato was a defense speech by Socrates in trial. In the last article Socrates explained why he would stop practicing philosophy and die instead of living without virtue. In this place, Socrates received a conviction and sentenced the death penalty. According to Athens' court system, Socrates must propose another penalty and 500 juries must decide both. Socrates originally suggested that he should not be punished, but should enjoy nationwide meals free of charge. As soon as they sentenced him to death, this proposition must have provoked many juries. Almost all of Plato's work is after Socrates' trial and enforcement. Plato showed interest from politics early, but the death sentence of Socrates and the disillusionment of the oligarch known as the "30 tyrant" seems to have led Plato to philosophical thought and writing life. (Plato is usually closely related to the dominant signal of the eight tyrants' eight months of tyranny, because his mother Uncle Christiania played an important role in the government, and his mother's brother Chaminus Oligocentricism carried out a widespread execution of political opponents, confiscating wealthy Athenian wealth.

Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan's Poetry Rushdie" is talking about two people, Saladin Chamcha and Gibbrell Farris. Throughout the novel, Gibrell has a strong dream, and the narrator suggests the theme of Satan's poetry. Satan's poetry is said to be part of the Qur'an that was invalidated after Muhammad said. It is said that the poet said that Allah is not the only god, there are three slightly smaller goddesses. The controversy of Satan's poetry, also known as Rushdie Incident, is a severely fierce Muslim fight against the publication of Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan Psalm", first published in the UK in 1988, partially inspired by Muhammad It is a reaction. In 1989, Iran's Ayholollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa who ordered Muslims to kill Rushdie. Muhammad made numerous killings of this novel to kill and explode. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan's Poetry Rushdie" is talking about two people, Saladin Chamcha and Gibbrell Farris. Throughout the novel, Gibrell has a strong dream, and the narrator suggests the theme of Satan's poetry. Satan's poetry is said to be part of the Qur'an that was invalidated after Muhammad said. It is said that the poet said that Allah is not the only god, there are three slightly smaller goddesses. The controversy of Satan's poetry, also known as Rushdie Incident, is a severely fierce Muslim fight against the publication of Salman Rushdie's novel "Satan Psalm", first published in the UK in 1988, partially inspired by Muhammad It is a reaction. In 1989, Iran's Ayholollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa who ordered Muslims to kill Rushdie. Muhammad made numerous killings of this novel to kill and explode. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time.

The second accusation Plato said was that Socrates was accused of thinking that the problem is metaphysical. This means not believing what God teaches them but believing in things like science and reason. This is one of the main things he did and the Athenians hate him most. The actual claim of this article is that "Socrates is an evil actor, a curious person who finds things in the basement and heaven." What kind of fake crime is this true meaning? Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. - Many educators believe that science is a complex instructional subject as it requires long preparation and planning. First of all, the teacher needs to fully understand the student 's abilities before beginning to develop curriculum for science courses. Some of the important areas that teachers need to find include levels of attention, interest and skills, knowledge and experience previously learned, and other special needs. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. Plato's apology is the story of the Socrates trial, his charges against him and through his process. At the beginning of the trial, Socrates seemed to have challenged accusations, including corrupting the youth, challenging the beliefs of the gods accepted and inspired by the state, and introducing new religious focus . I am trying to counter his behavior in the court. In essence, Socrates looked almost self-righteous and his defense surprised even his plaintiff, Meletus. However, at the end of the apology, Socrates became almost a different person. And while showing his own worth, he refused to plead for forgiveness and even did not save his life. Plato's view of Socrates is the difference between the accused and the person accused.

The second accusation Plato said was that Socrates was accused of thinking that the problem is metaphysical. This means not believing what God teaches them but believing in things like science and reason. This is one of the main things he did and the Athenians hate him most. The actual claim of this article is that "Socrates is an evil actor, a curious person who finds things in the basement and heaven." What kind of fake crime is this true meaning? Plato's apology is a detailed explanation of the Socrates trial, and Socrates is the great philosopher of Athens. Socrates received a trial on the crime of "defile youth" and "do not believe in God" (23 d). The Athenians believed that Socrates was eroding young people as they did not understand how to explore and Socrates taught them to cast doubts on what they thought was true. - Many educators believe that science is a complex instructional subject as it requires long preparation and planning. First of all, the teacher needs to fully understand the student 's abilities before beginning to develop curriculum for science courses. Some of the important areas that teachers need to find include levels of attention, interest and skills, knowledge and experience previously learned, and other special needs. Plato is one of the leading Socrates students, in his article on apology with Socrates, he has written his evidence, including a dialogue on corruption and corruption between Socrates and Socrates. . The apology is one of four conversations about this most famous trial and its consequences - the others are "Euthyphro", "Phaedo" and "Crito". In his trial, Socrates was condemned by two incidents: corruption to the God of Athens, introduction of a new god, and corruption of the youth of Athens teaching them to question the current situation. It is rude to blame him, as Socrates said that Delphi's Oracle is not a wise person in Athens. Socrates knew that he was not smart. After listening to the news, he asked everyone I met to find a smart person better than him. Plato's apology is the story of the Socrates trial, his charges against him and through his process. At the beginning of the trial, Socrates seemed to have challenged accusations, including corrupting the youth, challenging the beliefs of the gods accepted and inspired by the state, and introducing new religious focus . I am trying to counter his behavior in the court. In essence, Socrates looked almost self-righteous and his defense surprised even his plaintiff, Meletus. However, at the end of the apology, Socrates became almost a different person. And while showing his own worth, he refused to plead for forgiveness and even did not save his life. Plato's view of Socrates is the difference between the accused and the person accused.

Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. Because Islam prophets and Salman Rashidi opposed to the Koran are known. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. 117 11 17 11 17 117 117 117 117 117 117 117 Salsal salsal salsal salsal salsal new sophisticated salsal salsal new new novelty new novelty novel new novelty new novel new novel new novel new novelty novel novel novel novel novel novel novel fiction novel RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Betrayal of my son, and Renaissance Florence, Niccolò Machiavelli study really brutal power. 368 pgs. • 2009 028142 Kinbiku Borges, 17 works Jorge Lewis Book shows the great power of any of the greatest writers of the century imagination, intellect and style. Borges introduces us to an impressive singular and deep resonance field, we enter abyss of terror pascal, ie book calligraphy and text maze realm.

Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. Because Islam prophets and Salman Rashidi opposed to the Koran are known. In 1981, I introduced Salman Rushdie to me through his second novel, children of Midnight, and I remembered that it was mistaken for a child's book. Seven years after 1988, I heard that Salman Rushdie wrote another novel called "Satan Psalm". President Iran issued fatwa in search of Rushdie 's head. Clearly, the author wrote something that hurt some people's religious feelings, so Rushdie was condemned and sentenced to this "crime". Rashidi wrote a few lines hiding himself, but his life was no longer the same. I would like to read this book, but I think that was banned in India at that time. Salman Rushdie is a person who is not afraid to say his own idea. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel "Satan Psalm", it affected the confusion between Muslims and Rushdie. Socrates acquired enemies by guessing something on the planet. Rashidi can be regarded as Socrates in the village of the world as Salman Rushdie talks about his beliefs publicly and acquires enemies like Socrates. - Sometimes, everyone's life will make a tough decision. These decisions mean everything for you and can even be regarded as a matter of life and death. Imagine yourself being bothered by a philosopher named Socrates. They must face a big decision on whether to avoid imprisonment after being sentenced to death. For him, this is a very easy decision, and he suggested all the ideas in the conversation with Crito. 117 11 17 11 17 117 117 117 117 117 117 117 Salsal salsal salsal salsal salsal new sophisticated salsal salsal new new novelty new novelty novel new novelty new novel new novel new novel new novelty novel novel novel novel novel novel novel fiction novel RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Betrayal of my son, and Renaissance Florence, Niccolò Machiavelli study really brutal power. 368 pgs. • 2009 028142 Kinbiku Borges, 17 works Jorge Lewis Book shows the great power of any of the greatest writers of the century imagination, intellect and style. Borges introduces us to an impressive singular and deep resonance field, we enter abyss of terror pascal, ie book calligraphy and text maze realm.