Socrates and His Escape

Socrates and his evasion of each of us are accused of taking some action in certain aspects of our lives. But these accusations are very wrong, and from time to time people can do very few things to solve the problem. In this case, we are talking about a great philosopher Socrates, a man with many beliefs and thoughts. He is a man who believes in justice and gives justice to others. We study Socrates' thought and his rationality in health and logical thinking.

On the eve of the day Socrates was executed, Christ 's dialogue was a dialogue between Socrates and his friend Christos. Creo wants to help Socrates escape the death penalty and escape from Athens, but Socrates claims to claim that Christos is important to defend the death penalty and succeeds. Through this dialogue, Socrates detailed his views on the symbiotic relationship between justice, individuals and the state (more specifically national legislation). Creo proposed Socrates to try to persuade escape. The majority of Socrates' objections concern the city state and justice, and the consequences of the Hereafter in the Hereafter.

Introduction Socrates criticized him as not to evade the death penalty. Cleo was puzzled about Socrates' inference, and Cleo and his friends were able to persuade him to escape as they were able to offer ransom to security guards. If it is not for himself, Socrates should escape for his friend, son and those who benefit from his teachings. The views of Socrates and Crete start from this point. By the way, I still believe it

In this article we evaluate Creo's assertion about why Socrates is to escape from prison and Socrates's assertion as to whether he remains in prison and accepts his death sentence. I think that Socrates has more powerful arguments. First of all, I will first consider Crito's claims and show their strengths and weaknesses. Then I will list the discussions of Socrates and show their strengths and weaknesses. Although I am going to introduce all the points of Socrates, I pay special attention to his main argument, but the basis of this assertion is that unfair behavior hurts the heart of men and life is in the soul of destruction It is not worth living.

Creo mentioned three reasons Socrates should flee. The first two are rather weak. Third, Socrates's responsibility to his children is the strongest. The first argument of Creo was that if Socrates did not run away it would harm Creo in two ways. On the other hand, when Socrates dies, Creo loses a good friend, and on the other hand Creo's reputation is hurt. People will not know that Socrates chose to stay in prison. They would think that Creo might let Socrates depart, but he did not do it because he did not want to spend money. As a result, Creto gained a reputation that he spends more money than his friends. In this discussion, Creo believes it is a bad thing to do something that hurts a friend (Crito, 44b - c, Grube trans. Other places). This discussion is very narrow. It only takes into account the impact of Socratic behavior on Creo. Socrates later proposed these two points.