The Function of the Quest or Journey Motif in the Apology and the Crito

For example, the question that Socrates thinks he is exaggerated means that they never understand the essence of their work or existence. Whether young people were destroyed nature when they were in front of them. As he says, we can learn more about its nature through the application of Socrates. Slightly slow due to its size, you need to be stirred by robbery.

In a book criticized and apologized for reading by Socrates and Socrates and a critical apology, I found that Socrates was not an ordinary philosopher. Philosophers will question everything, but Socrates' method is different from most other philosophers. From one side of the road, Socrates can be considered insensitive and arrogant. Because he destroyed the law, they fulfilled their ideals, left their families, and ignored people's values. Meanwhile, he can question the fact that many people have no doubt about it, and can regard it as a wise man.

You can see two different speech styles used in Socrates' s "apology" and "criticism". In 'apology', Socrates protects himself and is trying to prove he is innocent. In "criticism", Socrates expressed his beliefs about the truth. You will find him speaking differently than he said. In "apology", Socrates uses rhetoric to convince people that he is innocent. He told everyone that people, not him, eroded the young. He interrogated the accusers. He tries to convince people that he is not an atheist by asking if one believes spiritual or semi-godly spiritual and sacred proxy. In this case, he used many methods to try to persuade the court, not speaking the whole truth, despite not lying.