Introduction Ten years ago, the German government decided to participate in the "war with terror" and its permanent freedom (OEF) and its intervention in Afghanistan as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). This decision is based on United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1368, 1378, 1383, and 1386 in November and December 2001. These resolutions are legalized general terms of intervention from the perspective of international law. The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Until today, attacks and operations have been carried out in other countries of the Middle East, including Iraq, devastated by war and Afghanistan. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight back jihadically. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram

The war with terrorism On 11th September 2001, my country suffered great damage, but the first twin tower was blown by the suicide bomber, the second tower was hit a little after 8 o'clock in the morning . The tower collapsed after 10 o'clock, destroyed the whole country and ruined the lives of many people. One plane also attacked the Pentagon in Washington DC and the other plane caused the same sadness in the countryside of Pennsylvania. The United States still expresses condolences, but as you stand together, the number of Americans who show pride in Americans will increase in the coming months. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight back jihadically. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. The war against terrorism, also known as the world terrorist war, is an international military strategy initiated by the US government after September 11 attacks on the United States. Nomenclature of movement uses a metaphor of war to refer to various behaviors that do not constitute the traditional definition of a particular war. US President George W. Bush first used the term "war on terror" on September 16, 2001, and in a few days later, in a formal speech to parliament, "war with terror" was done. In the latter address, George Bush said, "Our enemies are radical networks of terrorists and all governments that support them." On the second day after 9/11 terrorist attack, President George W. Bush announced that Al Qaeda's strike "is not just a terrorist act, they are war acts." Bush's "war with terror" is not rhetoric. He said. Instead, it is the definition framework. President Bush announced that war will begin from Al Qaeda, but said, "It will not be over until all terrorist organizations have been discovered, arrested, and defeated." He stated that the world war on terror is a "call for our generation unavoidable". "The resulting phrases and agenda have become general. From 9/11, the government has used that forum to disseminate several new premises.To first of all, due to the threat of Islamic radical terrorism, New rules, new tools and new thinking must be designed, as Dick Cheney vice president to deal with the novelty of the threat, "old security theory does not apply. "Criminal justice to trial terrorists is abolished and must be replaced with military methods"

Terrorism can be defined as "a subspecies of revolutionary violence" (Lodge, 1981, p. 1). The term terrorism was introduced during the French Revolution in 1789. Initially, this term was used to explain the violence that the French government imposed on "imposing a radical new order to passive citizens" (Roberts, 2002). Today, terrorism has a deeper meaning and has a deep connection with politics. I can illustrate two illustrations extracted from Europe and our background. The war against terrorism, which is an abstraction, is conceptualized in national security terms, demanding that "terrorism" be converted into a national category and then a war against the nation state. Our current approach will bring instability and danger, not safety. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Myriam_Dunn_Cavelty/publication/277714602_Power_and_Security_in_the_Information_Age_In_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ space / link / 55 cc 5 bbc 08 ae b 97567 4 c 8849 / · of state power · security · in · information age - survey - role cyber space.pdf - in - Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2013, the good and the bad guys seemed to put themselves in a neat and distinguishable group. "War on terror" still dominates national security strategies and arguments. It needs thousands of ordinary citizens to be suspected and needs to be monitored by information agencies that were mainly involved with state officials (the Soviet Union and its ally) throughout the Cold War era. Intent New enemies are absurd, extremists, enthusiastic, and it may be everywhere. However, the Internet gives the information community the ability to be behind the curtains of almost every living room in the United States, even if it is not a legal right.

In Prince and discourse, Machiavelli made a very specific recommendation on how the rulers are stable and dominate the newly acquired country. Machiavelli lives in an era when rulers can have different kingdoms through simple war actions. However, in modern times, rulers can not simply declare war and occupy territory. He must also face the influence of other world powers that exist today. Our time has evolved and the rulers must now take into account the views of other world powers and other global organizations such as NATO and the United Nations. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. The war against terrorism, also known as the world terrorist war, is an international military strategy initiated by the US government after September 11 attacks on the United States. Nomenclature of movement uses a metaphor of war to refer to various behaviors that do not constitute the traditional definition of a particular war. US President George W. Bush first used the term "war on terror" on September 16, 2001, and in a few days later, in a formal speech to parliament, "war with terror" was done. In the latter address, George Bush said, "Our enemies are radical networks of terrorists and all governments that support them." On the second day after 9/11 terrorist attack, President George W. Bush announced that Al Qaeda's strike "is not just a terrorist act, they are war acts." Bush's "war with terror" is not rhetoric. He said. Instead, it is the definition framework. President Bush announced that the war will begin from Al Qaeda, but he said, "It will not end until all terrorist organizations are discovered, arrested, and defeated." "The resulting phrases and agenda have become general. From 9/11, the government has used that forum to disseminate several new premises.To first of all, due to the threat of Islamic radical terrorism, As new vice president Dick Cheney said to deal with the novelty of threats, "old security theory does not apply, we must design new rules, new tools and new thinking. "Criminal justice to trial terrorists is abolished and must be replaced with military methods"

When President Bush asked Americans to participate in his "war with terror", most citizens could not grasp the comprehensive result of this claim. The terrible event of the September 11 incident was like a dazzling flash that suddenly made the country aware of the unimaginable dangers. Strong action is recommended to silence the skeptics and create a shallow sense of unity from the shared vulnerability. It is even more evident that it is difficult to hold the "war" where Bush was held, even after three years have passed. The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram

Bush's terrorism and civil liberty infringement Since the war began, almost all fixes to the Bill of Rights were reduced. The fourth to eighth amendments were particularly hit by this "war". Search and foreclosure, proper procedure, prompt trial by the jury, cruel and unusual punishment are all considered part of the current government's policy. "The war with terrorism" has substantially eroded America's freedom for centuries. The war with terrorism is an attack on American civil liberties and after the attack of 9/11, Japan was forced to face the problem of terrorism. The war with terrorism has set the war on the freedom of our citizens. Our civil liberties are passed by the Patriot Act, infringing our privacy and increasing the influence of racial profiling. The Patriot Act rendered a great influence on the freedom of citizens. The simple definition of the Patriot Act is as follows. Strengthen the United States and strengthen the United States. Mr. Dana Rosansky Wigglesworth Government and Politics January 12, 2016 Freedom of the Justice Department and Citizens 1. Administrative authorities and organizations can submit explanations of friends to the courts; they can allow lobbyist organizations to make a big impact on justice; for example, in 1991, the National People's Promotion Association of Japan, Clarence speaks Bush's terrorism and civil liberty infringement Since the war began, almost all fixes to the Bill of Rights were reduced. The fourth to eighth revisions were particularly seriously hit by this "war". Search and seizure, proper procedure, prompt decision by jury and public trial, and cruel and abnormal punishment are all considered part of the current government policy. One day, looking back on the disaster of the Bush administration, many things can be considered, such as the tragedy of the Iraq war, the shame of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, and civil liberties. Damage to the US economy is not a daily top news, but it is felt in the life of the person reading this page. I heard a fierce counterattack. In the seventh year of President 's inauguration, the president did not bring the United States into recession. The unemployment rate has reached considerably 4.6%. Okay, okay?

The idea of ​​realism about international relations was adapted within the context of the First World War of the 20th century. Strong countries with large military power are aiming to influence the hierarchical structure of the systems of each country and to protect their own safety and power. But these wars are quite different from today's non-traditional terrorism warfare. Therefore yesterday's realism theory is still useful, but at least some adjustments are needed to adapt to the current situation. Realism is a literary skill that explores the actual situation and personality. After the American Civil War, realism rose. The red courage badge set by Steven Crane during the Civil War is a good example of realism. Klein's novel depicts the reality of war, not idealized heroic warrior. Cranes explain the chaos in the battlefield. These young soldiers face an enemy enclosed in smoke, not an ordered enemy. The battlefield scene in the novel depicts chaos, chaos, and fear. The depiction of this realistic war is against the victory of glory and the idealized depiction of a brave soldier. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram

What is "war with terror"? Many people have different views about this, but my argument is that this is a series of tragedies represented by a group of people or those who hate America. These terrorist incidents may include bombing, shooting, or simply harming innocent people. The United States is 238 years old, but a lot of fears including 10 attacks such as September 11 attack, Benghazi scandal, Boston explosion, many natural disasters, shooting, Islamic extremists attack the United States It is. Event In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram Shortly after the terrible World Trade Center on September 11 and the Pentagon attack, President Bush announced that these were war acts, declared a "war with terror". But what is the purpose of this war? What does the president mean by terrorism? He spoke 32 times of terrorism, terrorism or terrorism at his speech to the country on September 20, but he never defined terrorism. I want to design a course that allows students to understand the definition of terrorism they bring - it seems unconscious. I hope they apply those definitions to some historical and contemporary episodes, including certain types of violence and destruction. I am not sure, but as students continue to apply the definition, they sometimes question the dichotomy "we are good / they are bad."

Terrorist war on terror came from George W Bush during the September 11 incident. This is not just the reason that 911 is a battle to stop the threat of all terrorism. Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political propositions. Bioterrorism, Ecotero, several types of terrorists use their strategies to solve various causes and causes. Some people use it as a war act or against a threat. The main war in the war with terrorism is the war in Afghanistan, the war began as the 9/11 terrorists attacked the World Trade Center. In this discussion there is little mention of what "victory" of the war with terrorism is actually. Traditional war The concept of victory is very clear. Please defeat enemies in the battlefield and force them to accept political conditions. But what does victory or defeat mean in the war against terror? Is this war over? How long does it take? Will you win? Do you recognize it when you arrive? It is impossible to win the war without knowing what the target is, so we need to start thinking seriously about these issues. Given the possible outcomes of war with terrorism, we can certainly decide that it can win, but we only recognize that this is a new, different war. Victory will not be brought about by foreign leaders accepting specific provisions, but political change invades and ultimately hurts people's ideological and strategic support to decide to destroy the United States I will. Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram

It is necessary to abolish the barbaric practice of whipping people suspected of having important secrets. People always believed that this interrogation method is useless by harassing people. These poor people say that what goes into their heart is in vain. Whatever they think, they want to believe. In 1798, Napoleon Bonaparte said that early in the 18 th century, the French chief found how illful it was. Use pain to gain information. Is the ultimate goal acceptable? Torture should not be as imaginable as slavery. In principle, since the end of World War II, governments around the world have agreed to prohibit torture even during war and terrorist acts. International treaties on torture and other inhumane and degrading acts are one of the most widely ratified treaties. Supporting these practices is not for the US alone; it is minimal in extreme cases ("torture and necessity principle"). According to a survey of abused prisoners in October 2006 by BCC, more than a third of nine countries believe that torture is allowed to some extent if they can save their lives ("Is that appropriate?"). In addition, two ethical theories were used in discussing whether torture was right or wrong: morality and Utilitarianism ("torture and rights") There are various opinions as to whether torture should be used in the fight against terrorism. "It is immoral to torture terrorists, but at the same time we must ask." It is immoral not to use any means to protect our innocent citizens. In the war with terrorism, it is proved that the task of the state obligation and the prohibition of torture related to it. This article focuses on that action as the United States has always been a major country of terrorism warfare. This document attempts to answer the question of whether it is the difficulty of banning torture in the war with terrorism and that it is reasonable to torture in the war with terrorism. 1.3 METHODS AND MATERIALS In order to judge whether interrogation techniques constitute torture, if so, how to prove these skills in the war with terrorism is reasonable. First of all, it is essential to establish a legal definition of torture. Second, we need to decide the relationship between the content of the war with terrorism and the ban on torture. Third, we study various interrogation techniques used in the war against terrorism and judge whether these technologies are reasonable or not. VT 2015 RV 4460 R, ttsvetenskap C (C-uppsats), 15 hours Inspector: Anna Gustafsson Handledare: Marja-LiisaÃ-berg

Within 12 hours after the September 11 attack, George W Bush announced the start of a worldwide war with terror. Since then, there has been a hot debate about how to win. President Bush and its supporters stressed the need to attack terrorists, deploy US forces, deploy democracy in the Middle East, and expand wartime power to war commanders. His critics focus on the concept of 'war on terror' or the need to fight it in various ways. Most major Democrats accept the need to exercise force under certain circumstances but success rebuilds moral authority and ideological demands of the United States, conducts wiser diplomacy, and cooperates with major allies It is through strengthening. It is realized. They believe that the attitude of Bush is that the war with terrorism caused more terrorists and that unless the United States radically changes its direction it will do so. In this discussion, little mention is made of what the concept of "victory" is actually about the war with terrorism. The concept of traditional war victory is very clear. Please defeat enemies on the battlefield and force them to accept political conditions. But what does it mean to win or fail in the war against terror? Is this war over? How long does it take? Will it win? Do you recognize it when you arrive? It is impossible to win the war without knowing what the goal is, so we need to start thinking seriously about these issues. A possible outcome of the war with terrorism is to think that it shows that it can definitely win, but only recognizes that this is a new and different type of war. Victory will not be brought about by foreign leaders accepting specific provisions, but political change infringes, ultimately weakening support for ideologies and strategies of those who decided to destroy America I will let you. When Washington and its allies kill or occupy all terrorists or potential terrorists, their ideology held by terrorists can not be trusted when their tactics are considered failures and find a more promising way to accomplish . Dignity, respect, and the opportunity they want. This does not mean to completely eliminate the possibility of terrorism threat but means that more pursuing this goal means more reliable terrorism. Influence the scope of life, attracting their thoughts, or causing overreaction. At that time, even terrorists will understand that their violence is useless. Please keep in mind that this vision of victory will not only avoid considerable pain, cost, and trouble, but will lead the leader to policies that will bring such victory. How can we get rid of the trap set by terrorists for us? Only by admitting war, we can win the war against terror. Of course, we must keep our safety, but we also have to rectify discontent with terrorism. Crime requires military action, not police work. ~ George Soros gives us gentleness, kind intelligent nature of noble, kind and intellectual aristocracy in its life, naturally sucking in the air they breathe in and giving us confidence It will be. Our own unverified power. Even after they left, they continued to play a more like role of ether. ~ Felix Adler Only propaganda and military power can win the extremist war - when rebellion, failure, often resurrection, more extreme, dissatisfaction it uses is not fixed. But the logic of the war with terrorism and rhetoric have spread through approval of the United States and its official enemies, confusing what the politics is based on reflections and dual opposition. It is partly due to the fact that countries that promise national terrorism can respect the sovereignty of the state and use international systems far beyond people and their rights. Terror experts have always believed that the terrorist war in the United States can not be won by force alone. Ideology to attract terrorists must be resolved in some way through rhetorical or competitive ideology. However, in the minds of men who are passionate about proofing manhood, ideological

Geopolitics is, to some extent, an academic discussion with the theme of the regional empire. In this discussion there are rare paths to a specific imperialist ideal, a successful crackdown or a big social strategy, but contact with various possibilities and the theme of the empire can not be stopped. Due to the necessity of creating the strict function of this empire, the paper on civic ethics and images of Western warriors became an expert rather than a spiritual figure. World Terrorist War in the World (2001-) Immediately after the terrorist attack on 11th September 2001, President Bush launched a global terrorist war - the longest duration war in America history. In the UK, several NATO countries and other countries participated in activities to eliminate Arcada and other armed groups. Islamic State (Islamic State) (2014-) War known as Iraq and Islamic State Syria (Muslim State), and also Iraq and Levant (ISIL) has threatened a wide area of ​​Iraq and Syria. Islamic countries in the Middle East comply with strict Muslim law. The fundamental organization consists of fundamentalist Sunni Muslims and foreign jihadists. In September 2014 President Obama approved the bombing of Syria's Islamic state. He makes it very clear that he is not planning to lay ground forces in the fight against Islamic nations. President Trump will remember the leadership in the global terrorist war for a long time. His decision to fight terror is a major victory for the remarkable weakening of separatist organizations like Iraq's Islamic state and Islamic state (Islamic state), Canadian Islamic state (ISIC) and Islamic state Nebraska (ISIN) I brought it. President Cardin Muslim's entry prohibition is believed to save the lives of thousands of Americans who otherwise would be killed as a result of terrorist attacks. When it is necessary to isolate Muslims living in the United States to protect themselves, President Trump has designed hundreds of individually safe and stylish hundreds of fashion camps. Following the September 11, 2001 attack, President Bush announced a worldwide war with terrorism. The objective of the world war on terrorism is to "defeat al Qaeda, other terrorist organizations, and any country that supports or protects terrorists." Since that time, the Marines have worked globally with other military forces to support this task globally. In the spring of 2009, President Barack Obama's Department of Defense spending reduction goal was to be headed by Robert Gates. The VH - 71 resets the Red Fallen and the VXX program. However, the National Fiscal Reform and Reform Commission cited the series of recommended reductions as a top priority at the end of 2010. Considering the foreclosure of the budget for 2013, General Amos set the target of a unit of 174,000 Marines.

"War of Art" is a military tactical text that has been going on for centuries. As the author of the text, my grandfather left the world with knowledge of the world. "Art of War" summarizes the military strategy of Tzu Chi and gave various principles to learn and understand Taoism, a family of his ancestors (Galvin and Giles). Military strategists specialize in "how small armies can defeat strong enemies" (Galvin and Gilles 15). Various historical "losers" have proved these strategies; the revolutionary war, the First World War, and the world war against terrorism today even today (Galvin and Gilles 21). One of the books I am reading now is the grandchild's "war skill". Sun Zi is a military general and strategist living in ancient China, one of the most important historical figures in East Asia. "Art of War" is a collection of tactics of the Japanese Army that covers the daily tactics that he created. "The art of war includes diplomacy, human relations, loyalty, battle avoidance, perseverance, preparation, strategy, etc. Even today (after 2500), grandchildren's teaching also applies to fields where competition is intense and difficult to handle Because it can be done, it is still useful. In immortal words of Pat Benatar, "love is a battle field." So, an evil song like 'The Art of War of Date': a grandson's strategy of defeating a woman. (It is expected that unfortunate male readers will help "win the battle between men and women.") There is also grandson's "art of war in love relationship". Gary Gagliardi, the author of "art of love", explored "the art of war" and created an amazing number of works, including "not limited" "art of child rearing: parenting of grandchildren". The art of war, the sound as useful, the art of war of terrorism: the art of terrorist war against grandchildren sounds like art of childcare When we think of "art of war", we are definitely related to grandchild's manuscript "art of war". But "art of war" is not a kind of writing itself, it is also a long time research department before grandchild work. If you directly paraphrase the meaning of "art of war", it is actually an order method of military organization, not a master of aesthetics. Therefore, in any orderly military country it can be said that it is practicing the art of war. However, Sun Jin's work is enough to make people recognize the name "art of war". Thus he became the main father of war research. As early as the fifth century BC, in the competition of many separate warlord countries, he was the first person to use and notice of the overwhelming ability of Sun Jin as military leader in Land Jindom . Sun Jin proved his ability by winning every fight he attended. Then he made Lu Jindome the strongest amongst others.

On September 10, 2001, Gorge W Bush announced that the United States is engaged in "a war against terror." Adolf Hitler was very important in evaluating how best to use propaganda when using publicity during the "war on terror". Propaganda attracts people's feelings by relying on stereotypes and myths of the country. Propaganda is most effective because it restricts the range of information provided and repetition is essential. Campaigns related to the war on terror have effectively used all these means and are very successful. On 7th October 2001, US President George W. Bush will begin dispatching US troops to Afghanistan to stop al Qaeda terrorist rule. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan will last until 2011. America has participated in the terrorist war for 8 to 10 years. - Before people are fully recognized in society, they need to experience many problems, discrimination and change can reach there. No one judges them based on their personal value. This also applies to the country. The government of the country always tries to make himself a higher position in the world. This is done because they have good quality. Canada is also the name in the list of these countries. President George W. Bush and his government advertised the phrase "war on terror" after the attack of 9/11. Since then, it has been widely criticized. Ultimately, terrorism is a strategy. How do many people fight tactics? Others claim to be involved in terrorism and state terrorism (whether many American allies - even in the United States themselves) are involved (right or wrong). So, "terrorists" are those people who do not like them, they do not like them, even if they are involved in similar activities. In addition, many people claim that the term "war on terror" is actually a war against American Muslims and even Muslims. On the second day after 9/11 terrorist attack, President George W. Bush announced that Al Qaeda's strike "is not just a terrorist act, they are war acts." Bush's "war with terror" is not rhetoric. He said. Instead, it is the definition framework. President Bush announced that the war will begin from Al Qaeda, but he said, "It will not end until all terrorist organizations are discovered, arrested, and defeated." "The resulting phrases and agenda have become general. From 9/11, the government has used that forum to disseminate several new premises.To first of all, due to the threat of Islamic radical terrorism, As new vice president Dick Cheney said to deal with the novelty of threats, "old security theory does not apply, we must design new rules, new tools and new thinking. "Criminal justice to trial terrorists is abolished and must be replaced with military methods"

War on terror This name brought many strong thoughts and emotions to today's Americans. This is the longest war in America, the most expensive war, and a fatal confrontation. Overall, the war in Iraq from 2003 to 2011 brought about 500,000 lives from civilians to extremists (Vergano 1). Even with the US military alone, it is estimated that some 900,000 veterans are harmed in some way from post-traumatic stress disorder to amputation (Ruis 1). Needless to say, many experts say that once all war compensation is paid, war will cost more than $ 3 trillion (Broder 1). In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram The aim of terrorism is to spread terrorism. This should be an explicit statement, but obviously it is not. Terrorists hope that we are afraid. They want to give the greatest damage to our lives, our way of life, and our democracy. The greater the impact, the greater the success of terrorism. This is not a place of my defense. It is a position to defend against terrorism. As a person felt intentionally and distortedly distorted as if he was proud of having managed somehow after the murder, I immediately deleted the tweet. This is not a fact, although many of the Twitter accounts from inside the United States now argue that this is not true.

President Bush announced the "war on terror" and took strong measures in the strategic struggle with terrorist groups, but the most prominent is al Qaeda, but the life of American citizens is far from his declaration. Americans answered "September 11" War Action ". It was full of democratic speech and strange patriotism. Unfortunately, the demo we are proud is really ignoring the reality of the subsequent war. Americans donated blood, set up funds for the family of firefighters, and did not expect to know anything about the intent of our country, and the popularity of terrorism in the Arab and Muslim countries I did not mean to understand the reason. America What are the conditions for reconsidering the violence of Orlando massacre and the larger 'war on terror', the real nature of the war, the impact on affected communities, and the announcement of victory? Between ignorance and love - the only struggle the ancient Greeks believed - what role does warrior play in greater struggle? Instead, a group of fighter planes will come to mind: the sacred band of Thebes. About 2,400 years ago, they were the first people who broke the Spartans in an average fight. Led by Holy Band, over 600 skilled Bobans beat 1,200 elite Sparta invaders. But as far as the warriors of today are concerned, the sacred band warriors are very different from the Spartans. In this discussion there is little mention of what "victory" of the war with terrorism is actually. Traditional war The concept of victory is very clear. Please defeat enemies in the battlefield and force them to accept political conditions. But what does victory or defeat mean in the war against terror? Is this war over? How long does it take? Will you win? Do you recognize it when you arrive? It is impossible to win the war without knowing what the target is, so we need to start thinking seriously about these issues. Given the possible outcomes of war with terrorism, we can certainly decide that it can win, but we only recognize that this is a new, different war. Victory will not be brought about by foreign leaders accepting specific provisions, but political change invades, ultimately weakening the support of ideologies and strategies of those who decided to destroy America I will make it. We will come to this moment through patience, determination and concentration. This is the strategy for our progress. The battle against terror is a different type of war captured by capture, victory per cell, and victory. Our firm belief in our patience and the success of freedom guarantees our safety. The United States will not relax until winning this war.

What is "war with terror"? Many people have different views about this, but my argument is that this is a series of tragedies represented by a group of people or those who hate America. These terrorist incidents may include bombing, shooting, or simply harming innocent people. The United States is 238 years old, but a lot of fears including 10 attacks such as September 11 attack, Benghazi scandal, Boston explosion, many natural disasters, shooting, Islamic extremists attack the United States It is. Event 9: 11 is an idol attacking the United States. The subsequent war was a war against terror. A picture of Sergeant Ziegler in his marriage made me understand what this so - called war on terrorism means. Although not important here, can we achieve this profound understanding only when we assimilate and think about it, and when we put things together. The diversity of the media we use to achieve this understanding - videos, printed text, spoken languages, still images - brings emotional depth to the story. And please connect it with us In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means.

That day was September 11, 2001. In the USA, people are preparing for their day without knowing the developing confusion. Despite the increasing number of terrorist attacks all over the world, Americans are unacceptable for oil led lives in the Middle East. When the first American Airlines 11 crashed in the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York, the perfect sense of America was shattered. Shortly thereafter, United Airlines flight 175 struck the South Trade Center tower, American Airlines flight 77 collided to the west side of the Pentagon, President George W took office. Our wonderfully respected allies in Saudi Arabia, the "war on terror" are engaged in the battle of inhumane and savage faith in Yemen. On the surface, this is a war against Hussein 's rebel faction backed by Iran. As Saudi Arabia blocked Yemen's border and port, as the 8 million people were slowly hungry, Yemen's infrastructure was destroyed and Saudi Arabian bombs killed 10,000 citizens. Dying America (and other countries) are positively involved in conflict; it sells weapons (a large number of weapons) to Saudi Arabia, for example, if an American aircraft has no aircraft Saudi Arabian fighters I can not fly enough to throw a bomb to a woman in Yemen Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Determining the success of the war with terrorism When the war with terrorism began, the Bush administration was facing serious military and diplomatic challenges. But it needs to worry about mobilizing public support. The White House may wish for further support from American citizens, as the latest opinion polls show that the public gives the president 90% support and supports the use of force at the same level. President Bush seems to think so. All the speech he did seems to focus on supporting public opinion, warning us about future difficulties, and intentionally applauding Americans about their "patience and determination". Government's understanding War may be defined as occurring between national states. But is there a civil war or so-called "war with terror"? Although the formal war declaration may be regarded as the definition of war actions, low-level bombing operations that have been carried out over the years, such as the US attacking the Pakistan border and the flight-prohibited strategy announced in Iraq in the 1990s, It is not included. Terrorism is another term that everyone seems to be ready to use, but no one can agree with a definitive definition. Even experts continue to discuss how to use this term, and it is said that there are over 100 different definitions of terrorism, but none are generally accepted. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram

The war with terrorism: The first round of the terrorist war in Busch-Troika began after a new government was established in Afghanistan. One of the poorest and most defenseless countries on the planet was bombed by rubble by the arrogant superpower, and this superpower does not limit the right to control. The South American terrorists, hangers, and dictators have more people than any other country, but they show what happened when others wanted. If we exceed President Bush's complaint, Pentagon's hype, and Rumsfeld and Ashcroft's remarks, what did we achieve? In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's He said he reduced freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means. The war with terrorism is an attack on the freedom of American citizens, and after the 9/11 attack our country was forced to face the terror problem. The war with terrorism has set the war on the freedom of our citizens. Our civil liberties are passed by the Patriot Act, infringing our privacy and increasing the influence of racial profiling. The Patriot Act rendered a great influence on the freedom of citizens. The simple definition of the Patriot Act is as follows. Strengthen the United States and strengthen the United States. Mr. Dana Rosansky Wigglesworth Government and Politics January 12, 2016 Freedom of provision of the Justice Department and citizens 1. Amikas Curia Definition: Administrative offices and organizations translated as "friends of the courts" can submit explanations of friends to the courts; they can allow lobbyists organizations to make a big impact on justice; for example In 1991, the National People's Promotion Association of the whole country speaks Clarence

After the war with terrorism did not damage civic freedom 9/11, the United States began fighting against terrorism. Many people in this country would say that we are actually fighting ourselves. One argument is that the war on terror is beginning to infringe our civil liberties. Is our civil liberty truly abused or is it being slightly modified by the Patriot Act to protect the best interests of all Americans? In order to fully protect Americans from future terrorist attacks, the Foreign Terrorist Tracking Working Group and the Patriot Act are essential parts. The war with terrorism is an attack on American civil liberties and after the attack of 9/11, Japan was forced to face the problem of terrorism. The war with terrorism has set the war on the freedom of our citizens. Our civil liberties are passed by the Patriot Act, infringing our privacy and increasing the influence of racial profiling. The Patriot Act rendered a great influence on the freedom of citizens. The simple definition of the Patriot Act is as follows. Strengthen the United States and strengthen the United States. Mr. Dana Rosansky Wigglesworth Government and Politics January 12, 2016 Freedom of the Justice Department and Citizens 1. Administrative authorities and organizations can submit explanations of friends to the courts; they can allow lobbyist organizations to make a big impact on justice; for example, in 1991, the National People's Promotion Association of Japan, Clarence speaks After the war with terrorism did not damage civic freedom 9/11, the United States began fighting against terrorism. Many people in this country would say that we are actually fighting ourselves. One argument is that the war on terror is beginning to infringe our civil liberties. Is our civil liberty truly abused or is it being slightly modified by the Patriot Act to protect the best interests of all Americans? - US civil liberties are not infringed by the law of patriotism How can we protect ourselves without compromising freedom when we face the threat of terrorism? Today, terrorism is a major threat to homeland security in our country. And as ordinary people gain communication and information through today's technology, terrorism becomes more common and becomes more difficult to monitor. Terrorists can now communicate freely with recent advances in technology Freedom of American citizens: Whether Americans adequately protect civil liberties. In the world where terrorism, war, and instability of the economy are imminent, the restrictions on individual freedom may be questioned. This is especially true when countries with these restrictions are being questioned as one of the world's major powers. Democracy, economics, social welfare, military power and general diplomatic politics. - ... The person who is against the body scanner will take off his clothes and show that there is nothing to hide. These machines are available at many major airports to prevent people from carrying around possibly threatening weapons. Measures such as body scanners are reviewed by the masses of the US and frequent customers, but such security measures are necessary to maintain high monitoring and prevent another terrorist conspiracy.

Risk of Terrorist War When explaining the problems facing Americans, the President of the United States used the words "war poverty", "drug war", "literacy war", "war hunger". The term "war" is used as a metaphor, meaning that we are willing to invest a lot of resources and spend a lot of time to deal with specific problems. As these phrases do not represent our determination to die because of this cause, no one seems suspicious of these phrases. Even in the civil war, World War II, and the Vietnam War or conflict, we have shown that we are committing to soldiers and deciding to spill the enemy's blood to maintain our freedom. The end of the Cold War brings new opportunities and risks. Civil war and terrorism created a new era of international disorder and instability in the vacuum of power left by the Cold War. Massacre of Rwanda and Sudan on September 11, 2001, and the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, is a failure of the United Nations peacekeeping operations and the failure of the United States as the only superpower to maintain the world order We are witnessing. Future world order must be higher and better use of electricity The main difference between the war with the current terrorism and the more conventional war is that this war may not end. . . . We declare to destroy certain terrorist bases and cells, but international terrorism as a dangerous and terrible technology for change will continue to exist. It became a cliche. . . At some point, if the US betrays its fundamental principles in the fight against terrorism, 'terrorists will win.' The image of a hooded man now known around the world poses a serious problem: it is possible to go back and forth in the moment of failure, and we never know it? Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.

The US government estimates that 37,212 Palestinians lived in the United States in 2010. The influx of Palestinian immigrants is often attributed to events known as 'riots'. The translated Arabic word "uprising" means "get rid of", but you can convert it to "uprising". The hostility of Israel and the Palestinian Authority came from the first recommendation. The current political position of the Israeli state and the Palestinian Autonomous Government has disappeared from the end of 2000 to the second breakdown of 2005. The main social problem faced by Palestinians is decades of war with Israel on the rights of Palestinian homes. Palestinians are people without a country. At best, they can only live as refugees, the worst being as refugees in crowded refugee camps. The young generation of Palestinians did not know when their people became peaceful. They grew up with consciousness of conflict and violence. The PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) and the Israeli government signed the Principles Declaration in 1993 and started restricting Palestinian Autonomy in 1994. However, both extremists opposed the agreement and peace that existed was very unstable. The Palestinians tried to build an independent house, whose rhythm increased with the onset of the uprising in December 1987, but it will continue. Casualties are enormous and there are too many physical, social, psychological, and spiritual problems caused by ongoing confusion. The Empire State Building and the Colonial-era anal in a unique Palestinian struggle fought a terrorist who chose to cause the British and its allies after the First World War, the legacy of the Zionist leader and the Arabs to Palestine The population of European Jewish settlers - the de facto colonial genocide system made them unpopular in their hometown - because of the Jews around the world their land He calls GM "Arabs" and denies them that they are citizens After September 11 attacks and the US terrorist war, the Israeli government launched its own "terrorist war" by occupying Palestinian cities and cities to eliminate terrorist infrastructure. The Israeli army pretended to eradicate "terror", beating tens of thousands of Palestinians, stealing and plundering houses, almost destroying the whole Palestinian society. The Israeli army threatened to ban ambulances and ambulance staff evacuation of injured people and to fire ambulances and medical personnel who violated Israel's orders.

Military measures aimed at supporting the arrest of terrorists are suffering from hunger and poverty and are a massive attack against the poorest countries in the world and the majority of their populations that can die due to riots . The gap between the wealthy people of the world and the poor are only the cause of the attack on September 11 and the attack on Afghanistan and the Philippines is deepening this gap so the hatred to the West and its civilization is increasing . In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram Thousands of people believe that war does not work, that war can not end terrorism because war is an act of terrorism, and that it is creating a new generation terrorist all over the world I will. Starting with our own killing, millions of people want to stop killing. We hope to adopt new non-violent response to violence in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen. We do not want to continue to encourage millions of oppressed people to join the Islamic state or al Qaeda. I want to stop killing, compensate and start treatment. On the streets of Ferguson, Chicago and Baltimore, we would like to face nonviolence even at home. Since the al Qaeda attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, Western leaders have considered terrorism the most serious problem of our time. George W Bush started his "fight against terror". In 2004, Tony Blair believed Muslim terrorism is an "existentialism" problem that needs "generation" to solve. The fear of terrorism has rebuilt the way we live together as a society and made it possible for us to change the law over and over again. In the UK, the new terrorism control law gives the country new power. These include the 2001 anti-terrorism crime security law enshrined just after the 9/11 case, the 2003 criminal justice (international cooperation) law, 2005 anti-terrorism law, other laws and regulations. "Terrorism Countermeasures Law", "2010 Terror Asset Freezing Law", 2011 "Anti-Terrorism and Survey Law", "2012 Free Law of Protection"

The war with terrorism may be difficult, but society should put maximum value on human rights, even though it means destroying anti-terrorism policy. In terrorist attacks, terrorist attacks are afraid of undergoing another attack, so they give prejudice and discrimination against similar nationality or religious beliefs. The issue of liberal democracy like Canada is to develop effective policies to limit potential terrorist attacks, which is also the right of individuals in democratic society. Since the attack on September 11 to the United States, Americans have been forced to seemingly sublime reasons to preserve American lifestyle, freedom and safety. We are currently fighting the battle against terrorism, the fight against evil, and the battle to protect innocent people. However, as the war in our foreign war was only the beginning, and hiding another war, many people did not even know that we are fighting. This battle is more threatening and intimidating than the fight against weapons. This is a political war, a war of words and a long-standing war. Therefore, as the war on terrorism spreads abroad, Americans face American lifestyle, freedom and security of the American government. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram From the beginning, the war on terror was also a war and an ideological struggle - a fight against terrorists and a murder ideology against them. In the short term, battle prevents the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction using military force and other state power tools to kill or arrest terrorists, deprive safe shelters, or to dominate every country And blocking the source of support. In the long run, winning the battle against terror means winning the idea battle. These ideas may make absurd people a murderer of innocent victims.

War is the right way. Why do people act violently like bombing, assassination, looting? How are individuals and organizations defending these terrorist acts? These behaviors can be explained as terrorist acts. Terrorism is increasingly an international issue. Over the past two decades, new terrorist groups have emerged around the world. The government has had little success in their efforts to deal with the terrorist use problem. The main problem in terror debate is the establishment of generally accepted definitions. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's He said he reduced freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means. The main difference between the war with the current terrorism and the more conventional war is that this war may not end. . . . We declare to destroy certain terrorist bases and cells, but international terrorism as a dangerous and terrible technology for change will continue to exist. It became a cliche. . . At some point, if the US betrays its fundamental principles in the fight against terrorism, 'terrorists will win.' The image of a hooded man now known around the world poses a serious problem: it is possible to go back and forth in the moment of failure, and we never know it?

Since its inception in 1998 NATAL's "Victims of Israel Terror and War Trauma Center" has promoted the concept of national trauma, a comprehensive pain related to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. In response to the constant change in post-traumatic stress disorder in Israel, we investigated the recent commitment of NATAL experts to achieve trauma in the "preclinical" population of IDF veterans. Expert efforts to non-politicize the pain of veterans is limited by the fact that their clinical ideology, the non-political language of treatment and the dark state of collective beliefs of common Jewish fate and identity The road is consistent. Despite the destructive implications, this consistency may be the reason for Israeli people to accept the agenda of NATA L. In PTSD and Israeli traumatic politics, Keren Friedman - Peleg reveals new ways to talk about psychological vulnerability and state ownership of modern Israel. Based on an ethnographic magazine field survey conducted between 2004 and 2009 in the Israeli terrorist and war victim center and Israeli trauma alliance, Friedman - Flager 's rich ethnographic research was limited to tradition I challenged the definition of trauma. In doing so, she reveals how these clinical definitions evolved into new identity categories, thereby strengthening the dialogue of new powers and new forms. Since its inception in 1998 NATAL's "Victims of Israel Terror and War Trauma Center" has promoted the concept of national trauma, a comprehensive pain related to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. In response to the constant change in post-traumatic stress disorder in Israel, we investigated the recent commitment of NATAL experts to achieve trauma in the "preclinical" population of IDF veterans. Expert efforts to non-politicize the pain of veterans is limited by the fact that their clinical ideology, the non-political language of treatment and the dark state of collective beliefs of common Jewish fate and identity The road is consistent. Despite the destructive implications, this consistency may be the reason for Israeli people to accept the agenda of NATA L. Founded in 1998, NATAL is a unique multidisciplinary trauma center, a non-political organization designed to treat people directly and indirectly receiving the influence of Israeli war and terrorism related trauma . Through treatment, prevention, public consciousness, and research, we are keen to lead trends in the field of trauma and enhance the resilience of Israeli society. Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has long been defined as affecting only individual injuries. However, in the context of modern Israel, what role does family, medical experts, donors, and the whole national society play in fulfilling and responding to this individualized trauma? In PTSD and Israeli traumatic politics, Keren Friedman - Peleg reveals new ways to talk about psychological vulnerability and state ownership of modern Israel. Based on an ethnographic magazine field survey conducted between 2004 and 2009 in the Israeli terrorist and war victim center and Israeli trauma alliance, Friedman - Flager 's rich ethnographic research was limited to tradition I challenged the definition of trauma. In doing so, she reveals how these clinical definitions evolved into new identity categories, thereby strengthening the dialogue of new powers and new forms.

Anti-Terrorism and Human Rights War The Human Rights Act of 1998 won the full legal effect with the legal system of England and Wales on October 2, 1998. This bill allows people to insist on certain rights and freedoms set forth in the "European Convention". Human rights The government expects that "human rights culture" will be formed within the UK if this bill is passed. The primary objective of the 1998 Human Rights Act was to legally and formally protect a series of rights clearly distinguishable by British law. On 11th September, and in response to terrible attacks, the alliance could not really win the war with terror unless human rights were protected. There is no compromise or vigilance for any purpose. Promotion and strengthening of human rights and democracy around the world is an integral part of the multilateral war with terrorism. It is also the right to confirm that everyone is released from extortion or repression. Shif said that there is a deep humanitarian obligation between them and demands that human rights violations occur somewhere. More than ever, the international community has to unite. It has to promote a peaceful and forgiving society that respects the rights of all citizens and strives to protect them from alienation and deprivation. More than ever, the international community has to help ensure that everyone has the ability to voice, democracy and the way to freedom, and their own personal desire. Poverty, hunger, and the poor can not enjoy human rights, they represent the pressure of the third committee The state has an obligation to provide protection against terrorism. Human rights standards place an active obligation on the state to secure the right of life, to free from torture and other human rights and freedoms. Terrorist behavior may violate all rights as an active obligation to protect the state. This does not necessarily mean that terrorist act is equal to failure of national protection. However, if the state does not take appropriate and appropriate measures to protect these rights, the state itself will be responsible for the violation. Therefore, effective anti-terrorism strategies may become part of domestic human rights obligations.

Identification of enemies in war with fear Summary: In a good old age, identifying and identifying who your friends and enemies are during the war, even though there are risks of racial and cultural stereotypes It seems easy. It turned out to be very difficult to bring up a war against the concept of 'international terror'. During the Second World War, an article entitled "American Handbook" was published in "Life" magazine on December 22, 1941. A part of the handbook details the method by which Americans can "speak Japanese from Chinese." I thought that these stereotypes are very ridiculous - but the article highlights this In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means.

1 Introduction In this article we will focus on the main features of the global terror threat and explain how the world changed over the past few decades to deal with this problem. In addition, we focus on the most important current development related to this topic. To make this paper a clear structure, divide the topic into six parts. These parts are introduction, dimension boundary, position, process, event, and finally a summary of information. The casualties of casualties and their future medical and society due to the terrorist war on the world scale: imminent public health crisis. "Military Medicine 179 (April ... World Territory Victims of Terrorism and its Future Health Management and Social Impacts: Imminent Public Health Crisis." Military Medicine 179 ... Aeronautics College Aviation College War Trauma Recovery from: Battle effectiveness against injured combatants in Catherine H's global battle Most war injuries are caused by anti-personnel fragments caused by mortars and other ammunition.These fragments Because many of them are blocked by helmets and protective clothing, injured people who need surgery will have multiple wounds and wounds. The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram

Please do not humilate the American flag in the war with Iraq. Stick to the window of a person and sew to the pocket, fit in the arm strap. People call it a unification of the United States, a gathering of injured people, support from everywhere in our country and people's feelings. Patriotism, they call it, and proudly show their red, white, and blue. But I want to know if I know the meaning of the banner. I read a public opinion poll, but I realized that most Americans want revenge even at the expense of war with many countries. I think the world has become a safe place since 9/11. Terrorist attacks on September 11 involved the United States in the war with terrorism. America invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was arrested and executed. Since America also fought in Afghanistan, the Taliban had to withdraw to the mountain and eliminate al Qaeda. The war with terrorism led to the exchange of fire in Pakistan and the murder of the planner Osama Bin Laden on September 11th. Islamic radical terrorist network Al Qaeda is confused Since 9/11, the United States had legitimate concern about the threat of terrorism. This concern is the driving force of the war in Iraq. Because Saddam Hussein is such a tyrant, it is easy to bring out a terrorist organization like al Qaeda from him. However, according to Iwan Elland, a journalist from Miami Herald, there is no evidence that this relationship is simple. This war will increase the threat of terrorism to the United States. You should remember that Islamic extremists were mobilized to fight Afghanistan Soviets Iraq's invasion will go directly to Al Qaeda. ) Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight back jihadically. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, after the terrorist war and the treatment of minor minorities in China, US President George W. Bush extended his hand to the United States to support the United States in the war against terrorism It was. China, one of the more surprising participants to this alliance, had not contradicted the US policy before, but seems to believe that the United States is sufficiently common to support this war . However, in recent months, China has not been applauded for unprecedented cooperation with "strategic competitors", but criticizing it by using war with terrorism to strengthen the "strike hard" campaign on a global scale It has been. In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram Reason for Attacks on Terrorist War Acts of terrorism are conducted by individuals or groups who have a strong ethnic, cultural or religious position and are not in compliance with national or international war agreements or principles. Terrorists are primarily targeting civilian and private structures, with the aim of causing indiscriminate killing and violence. Forces involved in anti-American warfare and hard-fought war against Iraq and Afghanistan are condemned to deny war morals for activities that are considered aggressive and unethical This is not a civil war but ethnic cleansing of ethnic minorities. This genocide is pure and simple, organized by various foreign troops and militias, telling the world that they are destroying terrorism and rebellion. This is a widely used slogan as an excuse for violence against people who do not meet the required pattern. In addition, as shown in the picture above, genocide is the process and the majority of the world is somewhere in the process. Denial is encouraged for people in industrialized countries, because perpetrators do not want to be charged. It is difficult to accept, but it is true

Michael Walzer is a well-respected professor at Princeton Institute of Advanced Studies, New Jersey. Walzer is writing many books, articles and articles. His article "Excusing Terror" is the most relevant article to events occurring all over the world. In this article, Walzer talks about the various reasons people want to appeal to terrorism. In this article, since terrorism is similar to murder, terrorism is wrong, so we insist that Walzers' view of terror is correct. There are over 109 distinct terrorism definitions. American political philosopher Michael Wolser wrote in 2002: "Terrorism deliberately kills innocent people, freely spreading fear to the entire population, forcing that political leader." American scholar Bruce Hoffman pointed out that revolutionary terrorism is not terrorism. Moral equality from the second year of revolution to September 2001 is nonsense of history and philosophy. . . Violence on 11th September 2001 was neither for equality nor for freedom. US President has not announced Preventive War Summary: The illegality of acts of terror is in action taken, and terrorists defined by Michael Walzer casually want to kill innocent people and create fear for political purposes. He expresses it as "cumulative practice", but it brings risks and vulnerabilities to groups of people, depending on what they are not doing. The core principle of the wartime law is that civilians can not be deliberately subject to war. Walzer emphasized that arbitrariness and innocent killings are two important features of terrorism. These two features are the means by which terrorists can achieve their goals and these may or may not be the legitimacy of the attack. When someone is identified as a terrorist, they usually refer to their ultimate goal, not the means they will use. Walzer believes that terrorist strategies are usually chosen from a wide range of possible strategies, so terrorism is always one of the options. Historian Howard Jin wrote that it is a bomb terror. Zinn said that bombing can not be called "battle" because sociologist Kai Erikson is targeting civilians. Justice war theorist Michael Walzer stated that it is reasonable to take control of civilians' lives under "the highest emergency". Richard A. Falk, professor emeritus of international law and practice at Princeton University, wrote in detail the details of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as examples of state terrorism. He said, "The obvious function of the attack is to intimidate the public through mass murder and expose their leaders to the prospect of extinction of the state."

The Iraq war, also known as the Second Gulf War, was a continuous military strategy for five years that began on March 20, 2003 when the US military invaded Iraq. This war is one of the most controversial events in the history of the Western world, causing unimaginable death and spending a lot of money. The reason for the invasion was that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and was ultimately denied by weapons inspectors. Many people question George W. More information: criticism of the war in Iraq, opposition to the war in Iraq, legitimacy of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, views of invasion of Iraq in 2003, protest against Iraq warfare, US public opinion against invasion of the Iraq 2003 invasion of Iraq Government's attitude towards previous Iraq warfare, media coverage of the Iraq war by the media, and the Bush administration's preparations for the Iraq war were filled with a series of public and official criticism from the United States and abroad. According to the material, many American citizens have many similarities with the Vietnam War. For example, the former CIA official explained the Special Planning Bureau as a group of theorists who threaten US national security and world peace, the organization lies intelligence activities to further promote it to remove Saddam's agenda He said that he operated. Since September 11th, supporters and opponents of the Iraq war have seen it extensively all over the world. The United States is trying to use terrorism as a decisive international security paradigm. Bush often expresses the war in Iraq as "a central front of the war on terror". Some people who criticized the war, especially those inside the US military, criticized Bush against opposing the turmoil between Iraq and the terrorist war and not paying attention to more important goals of fighting with al Qaeda. As Pentagon 's former chief operating officer Greg Newbold wrote in an article in the 2006 era, "I did not dispute those who decided to invade the country more openly I regret that people, their actions are really threatening neighboring countries.

The metaphor of terror should pay attention to the framework and reconstruction of the government and pursuit of metaphor. In the initial framework, "crime", "victim", and "perpetrator" were "taken justice" and "punished". The criminal framework includes laws, courts, lawyers, trials, judgments, appeals and so on. Several hours before "crime" turned into "war", there were "casualties", "enemies", "military operations", "war potential" and so on. Donna Dessfeld and other government officials pointed out that this situation is not consistent with our understanding of "war". There are "enemies" and "casualties", but there are no enemy troops, corps, tanks, boats, air force, battlefields. The first reaction of the Bush administration against the attack on 11th September 2001 was to act as a criminal act of terrorism. Within a few hours this framework was replaced by a metaphor of war, causing a "war with terror". The difference between these two frameworks is an implied answer. It means to trial a crime, bring it to trial, and make a judgment. War is the enemy's territory, military operations, and the government's war power. The term "upgrade", which represents an increase in the number of US forces in Iraq in 2007, implies that the United States intentionally expanded the scope of conflict-provoking conflicts and that the US strategy should be stationed in Iraq for a long time It suggests. Improve strength in a short period of time Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Recently, political terrorism is the most commonly used type of terrorism. Political terrorism often involves violence against civilians and other noncombatants. In North America, Oklahoma City bombs, World Trade Center bombs, and many political terrorism occurred. Terrorists use hostage taking, explosion of cars and trucks, assassination of political terrorism. Individuals and small groups different from certain political parties and political leaders may lead to political terrorism. If terrorists want to intimidate the public, their actions must go beyond the army and enter the civilian population. They have to give fear to certain groups of people who can become victims of terror at any time. This is the only way they gain enough power to achieve political goals.

Introduction Terrorism poses serious problems to the government and it takes a long time to resolve. People lose their lives, some people are banished, their wealth is destroyed, and they are affected by fear of people being attacked. The war with terror is a major challenge that most governments face to find ways and means of controlling it. More effort has been paid to fight the fight against terror, but as the current technology grows, attackers continue to develop new strategies, so the results are not as effective as anticipated. Since the announcement of the war on terror by President Bush on September 14, 2001, the policy of the United States has seen a decisive but often unrecognized change. Prior to 9/11, law enforcement agencies were mainly responsible for fighting American terrorism. Today, the army is at the tip of a spear of an anti - terrorist. This change seems to be permanent. In 2006, the White House 's national strategy of fighting terrorism confidently declared that America "destroyed the old orthodox who had limited our counter - terrorism measures to criminal justice". Since September 11 and its consequences - the September 11 incident and the subsequent 'war on terror', the fundamental mission of US law enforcement agencies and external / defense policy has changed dramatically. Since September 11, the policy of diplomacy with the United States has changed from passive to aggressive. However, the legal issues of law enforcement agencies, defense and foreign policy on this new terrorism countermeasure still have some challenges. Even if a new law is enacted, the face of terrorism is not the same as searching for serial killers and bank robbers, it is difficult to find a profile, and men, women and young people can become part of the group. Organizations and institutions can be used as frontiers of terrorism and at first glance and lawfully

If they plan to go to school on a beautiful day in April, I do not know if this is their last day, what do they think? Are they afraid to go to school, or they skip school. On 20th April 1999, Columbine high school two high school students Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris went to Columbia High School to deprive people of their lives. Columbine doubts as to who Dylan and Eric are, how their plans are, how they achieved their goals, what happens to that horrible day It was. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold are normal teenagers. April 19, 1997 - A fresh day in the memory of most people - the day when terrorism arrives at the native face. The Oklahoma City Federal Building is the most serious domestic terrorist act in our history. When the truck carrying the explosive stalled in front of Edward P. Mula Federal Building, 168 people died. Even after two years, every time the victim of a bomb looks at a momentary silence, this shock feel is everywhere. As the National Memorial Museum is expected to be officially approved, most of the destroyed buildings are expected to be completely demolished later this year You can have a familiar face Terrorism in the 21st century is occurring every day in modern life and we are indifferent to it. Daycare allows children to make others bully. Striking a family prove to their competitors that they mean that business is only one of more than 100 definitions of terrorism. There are various kinds of terrorism, but each is different, but it is right. Terrorism is a threat to the world society. Fear comes from Latin, terrere means "horrible", and Romans use it to explain "terror" Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Until today, attacks and operations have been carried out in other countries of the Middle East, including Iraq, devastated by war and Afghanistan. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight back jihadically. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Observing with the satellite image (Alex Kirby), trees and plants covering 55% of the land are gone. The reason is the bombing and shooting of the Taliban and American extremists. Dropped by atomic bombs, people moved from their homes to separate islands where wild deer and wild boar resided. In Afghanistan, severe drought occurred due to the disappearance of trees. In the past three years, the groundwater level has decreased by 74.6 million. Drought had a serious impact on agriculture. The war with terror is now the longest war in America. However, more and more anti-terrorism struggles withdraw from the headline and are being replaced by hot spots such as intense domestic politics and North Korea's nuclear program and trade disputes with China. But the war with terrorism is still going on - the battlefields of battle are undergoing major changes. In the Middle East, the military operations of the United States and its solidarity forces over the past two years succeeded in destroying the actual "caliph" of the Islamic state group of Iraq and Syria. However, the message and appeal of the group continue to resonate through the release of the Internet and social media as part of a complex global media strategy. In addition, the Islamic state is posing different threats now. Because "graduates" (from more than 80 countries) from the fundamentally primitive countries of Syria and Iraq began to return to their country of origin. The threat from terrorism is worldwide. This is an international threat. Therefore, when international cooperating countries fight terrorism, they must abandon their national interests. In the fight against terrorism, it is necessary to know that the relationship with terrorism becomes a network and it is necessary for each country to strengthen mutual cooperation between countries in order to realize a network for fighting the terror network. The war on terror in Iraq shows that in some countries the outcome of anti-terrorism operations is very limited. Because military power can not eliminate the root cause of terrorism it can not eliminate terrorism. Safety of the international community can not rely solely on military strength. In my opinion, the most important thing is not to fight terrorism after terrorist activity but to prevent and intervene terrorism. It is because this prevention needs to shift from danger to danger.

Most terrorist attacks occurring worldwide are often linked to Muslim communities. When terrorist acts occur, the media focuses on the potential mastermind of criminal acts in the Muslim community. Considering the association with colleague terrorism in most parts of the world, people related to Muslim cultures are subject to many discrimination. The main problem is all terrorist activities linked to the Muslim community. "When you go to the mafia, you will go to the Italian community ... If you are looking for Muslim terrorism, you will pay attention to the Muslim community," he told Politiso . "We are in war with Islamic terrorism, as the Mafia came from the Italian community, it came from an insider who came from the terrorist community from the Muslim community." In this article, we will identify and discuss the impact of war on members of the Muslim community in the United States. The war on terrorism in the war against terror is a joint effort by a US-led country to identify and eliminate members of the organized crime group engaged in terrorist activities on a global scale. Terrorism has long been a major threat to the nation, especially the security of the United States, but a new struggle was brought about by bloody terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center in New York on 11th September 2001. The war on terrorism against Muslim Americans The war on terror has had many negative effects on the social and economic sustainability of members of the Muslim American community. In this letter there is no doubt that terrorist activity in Western countries is closely related to Islamic religious groups or country of origin (Elaasar 20). This can be seen in historical assertions that prove the longstanding conflict between Christianity and its Western civilization, the Arab world civilization.

The historical background of terrorism and its follow-up step enter the permanent corridor of our conscious life with the terrible tragedy of September 11, and our response as society is multifaceted. There are shocks, sorrows, anger, and other emotions that we do not fully understand, we do not know to explain. When we look for explanations, our government, the media, and the university saints try to help clarify what we have experienced. We are told that our innocence disappears, the Third World War has begun, and not the one the world sees, but the new terrorism in a more deadly form. The best book on terrorism is "history of terror" written by Walter Laqueur more than 20 years ago. Because it places terrorism in an appropriate historical context and now avoids widespread mental errors. Let's say you are dealing with something. Innovative and unique. The word "terrorism" dates back to the French Revolution and has been accepted by various murderers, anarchists, assassins, intellectuals, and political and religious movement leaders, both large and small. From Robespierre to the Russian anarchists of the 19th century, from Sorel to Yasser Arafat, we believe that all these people can scare and threaten their enemies to achieve by ordinary political means I will. Terrorism is not new as it will realize political goals, it is not uncommon Throughout this article, Nunberg showed the timeline of the word "terror". The use of this historical background shows how the earliest form of the word was returned. I wrote when Nunberg stated that in 1793 Robespierre 's terror rule "terror" was said to convey a high emotion that you might feel when you were absolutely confronted. "Wonderful" has become a top of the general. However, now the original form of this word revives and symbolizes the endless struggle against terrorism. Nunberg emphasizes this by explaining another change in our language. We changed to "war" without using the word "war". It dates back to the 20th century and used "war" to counter social evil. There is never a complete victory