Can the War on Terror be Won?

Within 12 hours after the September 11 attack, George W Bush announced the start of a worldwide war with terror. Since then, there has been a hot debate about how to win. President Bush and its supporters stressed the need to attack terrorists, deploy US forces, deploy democracy in the Middle East, and expand wartime power to war commanders. His critics focus on the concept of 'war on terror' or the need to fight it in various ways. Most major Democrats accept the need to exercise force under certain circumstances but success rebuilds moral authority and ideological demands of the United States, conducts wiser diplomacy, and cooperates with major allies It is through strengthening. It is realized. They believe that the attitude of Bush is that the war with terrorism caused more terrorists and that unless the United States radically changes its direction it will do so.

In this discussion, little mention is made of what the concept of "victory" is actually about the war with terrorism. The concept of traditional war victory is very clear. Please defeat enemies on the battlefield and force them to accept political conditions. But what does it mean to win or fail in the war against terror? Is this war over? How long does it take? Will it win? Do you recognize it when you arrive?

It is impossible to win the war without knowing what the goal is, so we need to start thinking seriously about these issues. A possible outcome of the war with terrorism is to think that it shows that it can definitely win, but only recognizes that this is a new and different type of war. Victory will not be brought about by foreign leaders accepting specific provisions, but political change infringes, ultimately weakening support for ideologies and strategies of those who decided to destroy America I will let you. When Washington and its allies kill or occupy all terrorists or potential terrorists, their ideology held by terrorists can not be trusted when their tactics are considered failures and find a more promising way to accomplish . Dignity, respect, and the opportunity they want. This does not mean to completely eliminate the possibility of terrorism threat but means that more pursuing this goal means more reliable terrorism. Influence the scope of life, attracting their thoughts, or causing overreaction. At that time, even terrorists will understand that their violence is useless. Please keep in mind that this vision of victory will not only avoid considerable pain, cost, and trouble, but will lead the leader to policies that will bring such victory.

How can we get rid of the trap set by terrorists for us? Only by admitting war, we can win the war against terror. Of course, we must keep our safety, but we also have to rectify discontent with terrorism. Crime requires military action, not police work. ~ George Soros gives us gentleness, kind intelligent nature of noble, kind and intellectual aristocracy in its life, naturally sucking in the air they breathe in and giving us confidence It will be. Our own unverified power. Even after they left, they continued to play a more like role of ether. ~ Felix Adler

Only propaganda and military power can win the extremist war - when rebellion, failure, often resurrection, more extreme, dissatisfaction it uses is not fixed. But the logic of the war with terrorism and rhetoric have spread through approval of the United States and its official enemies, confusing what the politics is based on reflections and dual opposition. It is partly due to the fact that countries that promise national terrorism can respect the sovereignty of the state and use international systems far beyond people and their rights.

Terror experts have always believed that the terrorist war in the United States can not be won by force alone. Ideology to attract terrorists must be resolved in some way through rhetorical or competitive ideology. However, in the minds of men who are passionate about proofing manhood, ideological arguments are for people who are too weak or for two weak people. The card's policy from the promised boundary wall to the promise of 'exclusion of Islamic terrorist organization' is based on the belief that strength is important for significance, visible and customary compulsion, punishment and exclusion I will. When we encourage boys to become strong as boys, or when we invade their space and body by allowing their violence, we are as strong as the boys of society.