Risk of Terrorist War When explaining the problems facing Americans, the President of the United States used the words "war poverty", "drug war", "literacy war", "war hunger". The term "war" is used as a metaphor, meaning that we are willing to invest a lot of resources and spend a lot of time to deal with specific problems. As these phrases do not represent our determination to die because of this cause, no one seems suspicious of these phrases. Even in the civil war, World War II, and the Vietnam War or conflict, we have shown that we are committing to soldiers and deciding to spill the enemy's blood to maintain our freedom.
The end of the Cold War brings new opportunities and risks. Civil war and terrorism created a new era of international disorder and instability in the vacuum of power left by the Cold War. Massacre of Rwanda and Sudan on September 11, 2001, and the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, is a failure of the United Nations peacekeeping operations and the failure of the United States as the only superpower to maintain the world order We are witnessing. Future world order must be higher and better use of electricity
The main difference between the war with the current terrorism and the more conventional war is that this war may not end. . . . We declare to destroy certain terrorist bases and cells, but international terrorism as a dangerous and terrible technology for change will continue to exist. It became a cliche. . . At some point, if the US betrays its fundamental principles in the fight against terrorism, 'terrorists will win.' The image of a hooded man now known around the world poses a serious problem: it is possible to go back and forth in the moment of failure, and we never know it?
Terrorism and "war on terror" may be the best examples of the new war era. Since September 11, 2001 and the US invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has always been an exaggerated expression at the national and international stages. Till today, attacks and operations are taking place in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were devastated in war, and in other countries of the Middle East. During President Obama's term, the clear "UAV" strategy adopted by the US government is the subject feature of its "war on terror", which usually causes high-level civilian casualties and effects I did not fight with the jihadist in a matter of course. During President Obama 's presidential inauguration, an American - led coalition for Islamic states was established, attacking jihads with tens of thousands of bombs, mainly in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.