The war against terrorism

War is the right way. Why do people act violently like bombing, assassination, looting? How are individuals and organizations defending these terrorist acts? These behaviors can be explained as terrorist acts. Terrorism is increasingly an international issue. Over the past two decades, new terrorist groups have emerged around the world. The government has had little success in their efforts to deal with the terrorist use problem. The main problem in terror debate is the establishment of generally accepted definitions.

In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. "Not guilty before conviction" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer applicable. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, the plaintiff becomes a judge and enforcer I will. Authority diagram

The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's He said he reduced freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means.

The main difference between the war with the current terrorism and the more conventional war is that this war may not end. . . . We declare to destroy certain terrorist bases and cells, but international terrorism as a dangerous and terrible technology for change will continue to exist. It became a cliche. . . At some point, if the US betrays its fundamental principles in the fight against terrorism, 'terrorists will win.' The image of a hooded man now known around the world poses a serious problem: it is possible to go back and forth in the moment of failure, and we never know it?