Identifying the Enemy in a War Against Terrorism

Identification of enemies in war with fear Summary: In a good old age, identifying and identifying who your friends and enemies are during the war, even though there are risks of racial and cultural stereotypes It seems easy. It turned out to be very difficult to bring up a war against the concept of 'international terror'. During the Second World War, an article entitled "American Handbook" was published in "Life" magazine on December 22, 1941. A part of the handbook details the method by which Americans can "speak Japanese from Chinese." I thought that these stereotypes are very ridiculous - but the article highlights this

In the past two decades, the term "terror" is headline news, and many national states have fought a war "we are fighting terror", but terrorism is a strategy, and in the fight against tactics It has no meaning. . But this does not prevent citizens of these countries from committing themselves to war without real enemies and without the end. "Terrorists" are the most powerful and deadly among all words and expressions created by bilingual writers. It gives absolute power to the people and other less powerful nations. The expression "not guilty until guilty is proved" is one of the most sacred principles of the US criminal justice system and it is no longer the case. When the term "terrorism" is spoken, plaintiffs become judges and enforcers. Authority diagram

The criticism of the war with terrorism involves "surrounding war on terror", moral, efficiency, economic and other issues, and calls itself a misnomer. The concept of "war" against "terrorism" has proven to be very controversial, and critics use it to pursue long-term policy / military goals, and the citizen's Accusing them of reducing freedom and human rights violations. Some people think that the term war is not appropriate in this context (like a drug war), because there are no identifiable enemies, international terrorism can not be ended by military means.