The Function of Polite speech
[2023-05-16 10:47:48]
We evaluated B1 as 2 because their vocabulary is very small and generally the sentences of this person are weak.
To be honest, I think posting this paper is very good. In fact it is a bit lacking in language, but it shows an excellent example.
Like the previous article, this article is well written. It makes it stand out from others that it not only gives examples of exaggerated and polite real world but also uses those personal expiration dates and includes more writing elements is.
The reason why this article gave a very low score on the AP scale is that it lacks control over the language and contains undeveloped arguments. I can explain a bit about what the authors of this section mean, but there is still no clear explanation yet.
When explaining how politeness helps the community, it does not fully develop their beliefs / status, but trying to gain a clear understanding of their ideas
Some of limiting this submission to get 4 is that it has many imperfect ideas. They will get a very important topic and switch it immediately or will never complete my beliefs and opinions
As in the previous paragraph, this is a little undeveloped but it starts showing some complete ideas
They answered prompts separately and gave a good example, why is paragraph / grammar usually "unknown"?
H1 explicitly develops their position (requires courtesy), using personal expiration and secular expiration to answer prompts, effectively writing the ability to effectively write rhetoric numbers indicate. That paper is going very well
The reasoning behind the investigation of the first paragraph and its scoring is that it meets all the criteria of 8 but because of its advanced language and language it is beyond that. This is understandable, very professional and complex. It is recommended to place it at the top
For example, "I am an active representative", "I do not have any usefulness to start talking", "Innovation", and "as an obstacle to direct dialogue between individuals"
To be honest, I judge myself very strictly. Especially because I want to become better. However, I do not finish my article, so I try to reach the peak.
I use very high vocabulary, but I think that I can not tell my viewpoint or obey my idea in the correct way according to my own idea.
The skill I need now is to make sure that the branch to other elements of the effective composition, the departure from the sound of each paragraph, and my view / view on the subject are clear to the reader.
Effectively convince the audience that your belief in the value and function of social polite speech is logical and correct. Using actual experience as evidence is more effective as it becomes a more personal and philosophical memory, and as long as people can not remember the research or articles in this field (I can not), there is no other evidence . Using the message, I prove that the cost of the university going there is high. The authors need comprehensive sources, but the hints are flexible and the authors can express their views (this is not just for everyone's pursuit of higher education, but for those who really need it You can choose your major). If the view is a less supported view, you need to read carefully and drill down to gather sufficient evidence.
18 Although the three speech plays different communication and political functions, the planned speech, the monologue of the future speech, and the important role played by the speaker, that is, the audience, the expert (senator) A house (democratic supporter, American people, or a wider audience in the world) speaks, expresses sympathy, applauds, and can join, agree or disagree in some way. No one spoke during the speech, and the speaker was not disturbed by the question. "The nature of the persuasion strategy of type (or subtype) depends to a large extent on the contextual factors." In particular, the planned function of the three presentations allows speakers to use specific language form