Is Graffiti Art Or Vandalism?
[2023-07-17 07:57:06]
Graffiti (aka street art) art? This is a problem I often see, usually from students working on school reports ... and there is a strong opinion about this. I think that we must first understand that it is difficult to define "art" itself. But beyond the official definition, art is a self expression that may attract others or may not. Let's see some famous works of art. Leona Da Vinci's Mona Lisa. It was painted on a piece of wood and assembled. Why is this art? Shadow, depth, landscape, mysterious smile etc. If it is drawn on the brick wall of the street of Italy, is this an art? of course. That art is in the picture, not in the medium.
Pablo Picasso's Guernica. This may be Picasso's most famous artwork. The size of the mural painted on the canvas. Of course, this is art. If Picasso drew a picture directly on the wall on one side of the street, is this an art? Yes. What if he does this without permission? Still the art is ... illegal paintings. Do you like it? It does not matter if it does not work, it is still art.
Graffiti art (aka street art) is an art style. Street art drawn in this style is still art. You can paint on trees, canvas, ceiling, brick walls, sidewalks and so on. Regardless of the medium, it is still a work of art. This is a legitimate street art if street art is legally drawn, meaning that it is owned by an artist or owners own property.
Even if street art is illegally drawn, meaning the property not owned by the artist, even if it is art without permission, the artist committed a crime of vandalism. So, on Tuesday evening, a walk at the street 115 at Da Vinci, Picasso or Michelangelo, and throw art pieces at the Sistine Chapel next to the Mona Lisa, Guernica and the coin laundry ... ... that is art. But this is also a vandalism. It can be ... it is not one or two questions
Graffiti: Art is still vandalism? Sam Cowey Graffiti has been active all over the world for over 5 years. But whether it is art form or vandalism is controversial. Discussion of graffiti artists does not understand that many people have imprisoned most graffiti artists, are fined, injured, and in some cases danger of death. A graffiti artist can have a simple desire to want to be recognized, or to create a work to tell the audience.
When discussing graffiti topics, the main question for most people is whether graffiti is art or vandalism. Before answering this question, I still have many questions to answer. What is art with graffiti? What is vandalism? There are small graffiti with destructive graffiti, and if so, who decides where? For the first time after answering these questions, someone can judge exactly whether it is art or vandalism! Art is art (painting, sculpture, music, etc.) focuses on creating beautiful objects. In these three categories of art, each category has more subcategories. There are also arts in other categories such as architecture, photography, digital art. The main problem of art is that it is a wide range and is generally thought to be in the eyes of bystanders. And that makes many differences from person to person possible.
I will explore whether graffiti is a work of art or a vandalism. By exploring this research topic, I will break it down into different parts. The first part defines what vandalism is, the views of other researchers, and the behavior of vandalism. In the second part, I will define art. I will also define graffiti and discuss its history and development. I will also study famous graffiti artists to improve my research efficiency. This controversial issue is for people whose graffiti knowledge is limited. People claim that graffiti is an illegal act without directly understanding the facts. I hope that my research extends the range of knowledge once they read my articles. Finally, I end up expressing my view on this topic.