Theory of the furnace Several people gave the name of the United States, a furnace from the 1800s to the early 1900s. People imagine this because thousands of immigrants around the world enter the United States and want to live a better life. Therefore, most people imagine that all these different cultures are poured into a huge pot called the United States, heated to low boiling point and shaped into a kind of person. If you think about this theory after a step backwards, it is not entirely correct. In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like the United States, you had the former identity after you became a new American identity. Everyone in the United States shares this commonality, creating a more homogeneous country. In a multicultural or mosaic country such as Canada, everyone like the Canadians highly appreciate the difference and identity of each other. It sounds better than the other, but both ideals have both advantages and disadvantages. Since the 1960 's, most of the sociology and history studies have ignored the furnace theory used to explain the ethnic relationship between the United States and other countries. Multiculturalism provides alternative analogies for racial interactions, including salad bowl theory, or cultural mosaics like the Canadian knows. In the 1990s, the political correctness of the United States has the right to maintain and maintain the distinction and integrity of each culture and state group of each state and state, to integrate or integrate the person's heritage in most European countries He emphasized that there is no need to absorb or give up. Anglo-Saxon / American Society

The United States is traditionally called a furnace. It is because immigrants have merged over generations. They gave up their culture and are fully integrated in American society. But in the UK, cultural diversity is considered positive and I have always encouraged immigrants to maintain tradition and mother tongue. The model of this racial integration can be expressed as a salad bowl that lives with people of various cultures such as salads, tomatoes and carrot lettuce. All of these attacks involve people in the Muslim community that seems to be integrated into society. For example, in multicultural cities, some people live and work without having to learn national languages ​​throughout their lives. The ideal situation is a society in which all citizens have equal rights and opportunities, but they can also maintain their personality. It is not easy to put this ideal into practice, but multi ethnic society has become a reality. In my opinion, America has changed from a salad bowl society to a dissolving society. In this article we will further explain the meaning of the furnace and salad bowl. Then it compares the two perspectives, in the end it will show that American labels as melting pots are better suited as a society with multiethnic dimension. Before discussing whether the US is a salad bowl or a melting pot society it is important to pay attention to the exact meaning of the two terms. The furnace is the name of an American society, not emphasizing where people came from, what religion they are involved in, or how to live. It celebrates the idea that everyone is just an American and follows a strict American approach. When people are integrated into the composition of the furnace society, they will melt into the Americans Whether it's a salad bowl or a pot in America, it will cause intense debate and controversy. The furnace is a society that does not emphasize the national background and everyone will be the only Americans. The salad bowl, on the other hand, is a society in which differences in ethnicity and culture are remarkable and highly appreciated. In my opinion, America has changed from a salad bowl society to a dissolving society. In this article we will further explain the meaning of the furnace and salad bowl. Let's compare the two perspectives and, finally, show how the label as an American crucible is suitable for multi ethnic society. Today's America more accurately represents the analogy of a salad bowl, not a furnace. The furnace metaphor means that all the ingredients are combined to form a homogeneous mixture (everywhere the same); the salad bowl, although we all contribute to the flavor, each ingredient is still in its own Indicates that it is one. - 1) When considering a complex organizational structure like a criminal justice organization, we must consider the existence of conflicting purposes. The ultimate goal of each organization is to achieve the goals listed and the anticipated goals. This is a direct measure of the effectiveness of the organization. But, if your organization has many complex goals, are these goals conflicting?

The colorful colors dance in the citrus tasting room, leaving vivid fabrics and food. Spicy and enthusiastic scented swirls, fruity of "FelizañoNuevo!", Full of vivid green and yellow decorations like Juicy Orange. This is a New Year in New Mexico, families celebrating their traditions just like any other country in the United States. This is very important for our society. It is the heritage and tradition of multiculturalism and diversity that gives us equality, peace, and a new perspective of our country. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him. This view of crucibles is carried out through self-recognition of the United States. We believe that we are immigrants from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first permanent pioneer was White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Then each country followed a similar story and then studied the generations of mainstream culture, English, adopted the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to America in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it. In the beginning of the 20th century, the meaning of the concept of dissolution pot which has become popular recently has been constantly being debated mainly on immigration control issues. Discussion on the concept of crucibles focuses on how immigration affects the American society and how to reach immigrants. The crucible is equivalent to cultural adaptation and complete assimilation of European immigrants.The discussion focuses on the difference between the two approaches to immigration. Will Angro Protestants like Henry Ford or Woodrow Wilson, or all of them, Mayflower descendants and Sicilian, Ashkenazi and Slovaks react to each other and all will change? "

The American furnace in North America and South America was always an ancient habitat for human movement. The first immigrants are believed to have occurred by Asians who crossed the frozen Bering Strait from Siberia. When Columbus crossed the Atlantic Ocean for the first time, he accidently called these indigenous Indians "Indians" and believed he arrived in India. Then Europeans started mass migration to this "new world". And it divided the new native land into the country. The greatest of these countries became the United States including mainly those who emigrated from Western Europe, the slaves brought by Africa, and the original indigenous people. In The Melting Pot (1908), playwright Israel Zangwill (1864-1926) explored the issue of discussion on immigration policy in the era of progress. Zangwill's theme of positive attention of the American crucible resonated extensively in the pop culture of the 20th century, literature and academia; his cultural symbol - his immigration problem - the number of American immigrants embodied in Hollywood movies Ten years cultural imagination provides information. A nationwide celebrity image in popular culture often includes a stereotype on immigrant groups. For example, the public image of Frank Sinatra as a superstar contains an important element of the American dream, which is combined with an Italian-American stereotype based on nativeism and progress toward immigration I will. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him.

America may become a crucible of culture, but it seems that only other cultures can assimilate. Not only is the tradition of most ethnic groups of my family forgotten, but I do not have any knowledge about cultures other than the United States. I could neither live nor visit outside my country. I do not want to see such a small worldview. Even though I live in Western culture, I do not know how other Western cultures live. As a country, it seems that America is too young to even even understand the world culture. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him. This view of crucibles is carried out through self-recognition of the United States. We believe that we are immigrants from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first permanent pioneer was White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Then each country followed a similar story and then studied the generations of mainstream culture, English, adopted the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to America in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it.

Most of Shake Spear's characters are doing this; we do not express "wealth" as "dislike" or express obstacles as "sling and arrow". "There is no external monologue or our heart." Recently, people have not announced their goals in a magnificent way. Recently people have not been spoken in a unified dialect, especially in the British upper class dialect; the dialogue between Jack and Algernon is almost identical except for the content. In 1909, Israel Zangwill wrote his play "Melt Pot", during which time the hero cried. German and French, Irish and British, Jewish and Russian - Please join us with Crusoe! God is creating Americans. For the concept of 'cultural pluralism'. His racial and cultural concepts are ambiguous, but he thinks that true democracy requires a multicultural society. Democracy means freedom and self-actualization. In his view, compulsion assimilation is anti-democratic and non-Americans. A century later, Ralph Waldo Emerson used the image of the furnace to explain the process of "turning British, German, and Irish immigrants into Americans" process. . . . Immigrant personality and even his ethnic and religious features are integrated into democratic turmoil as brass debris is thrown into the crucible. "During the slavic language, the Jews, and the Big Wave in 1908, this sentence gained a wider currency, the Israeli Zangwillese play" Meltpot "was completed. A wonderful dissolution pot of dissolution and reconstruction of all races in Europe! " This view of crucibles is carried out through self-recognition of the United States. We believe that we are immigrants from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first permanent pioneer was White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Then each country followed a similar story, followed by a generation of mainstream culture, English, adopted the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to America in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it.

Marriage 2 furnaces of different colors: irrespective of whether interracial marriage will be or not. This is another problem. Social scientists and societies have classified social scientists and societies as classifying people involved in interracial relationships as uneasy people or attempting to develop rebellious or social ladders (Majete 2000, 1) . It seems that today's situation is no longer the case. But this is still controversial. Part of the reason for this controversy was that in the United States until 1967, there were laws in banning marriages between color people and whites in 45 states out of our 50 states . According to Schwartz (2000: 17), the rise in interracial marriage is the result of immigrants and opportunities to meet people with diverse ethnic backgrounds are increasing. For example, the United States is considered a crucible. There are various races classified as society in the United States (Schwartz, 2007: 23). This allows African immigrants to make many different kinds of romantic relationships / interracial marriages. Immigrants made a transition to marriage by distributing spouses of different backgrounds. In addition, immigrants have influenced many people's views on marriage by introducing new cultures to people. Ethnic marriage among African immigrants is beneficial as it seems to be the gateway to integration and assimilation, especially people who are excluded from society. 1 Intercultural marriage is a marriage between two people with different (cultural) background. Interracial marriage is a marriage in which spouses are identified as belonging to various ethnic groups such as American Indians, Asians, African, Caucasian, Hispanic. International marriage is a marriage between citizens of two different countries. Marriage can be considered intercultural, interracial, and international, but it does not have to be necessarily so. All couples participating in this research can be described as intercultural and international. A Korean-American couple can be described as a relationship between different ethnic groups Leisure Research Journal Copyright 2013 2013, Vol. 45, No. 4, pages 445 to 465, National Recreation and Park Association Historically, many American religions do not support ethnic marriages. Religious tradition and attendance of the church are consistent predictors of attitudes towards different ethnic marriages. Biblical writers rarely support the interracial marriage of Asians and Hispanics. Caucasians participating in multi ethnic groups and religious activities are likely to support marriages of different races. The relationship between religion and interracial dating is relaxed in this area. Children who are receiving religious education in non-Western countries, especially in the south, are less likely to become obsolete during the day than children who are not receiving religious education. Religious attitudes combined with Christian nationalism strengthen opposition between marriages rather than independent measurements

Eclecticism: Crucible of Education "Plastisen and self expression can not solve the problem of education, teaching of technology and occupation is not solved; classic and top 100 book" (Aldous Huxley, British novelist, essayist, Critic) If this is true, what can solve educational problems. Hundreds of people tried to answer this question, but said the same thing over and over. Pure philosophy has never solved how to handle mass public education and personal education, so I did not choose a specific philosophy. In the beginning of the 20th century, the meaning of the concept of dissolution pot which has become popular recently has been continuously discussed mainly on immigration control issues. Discussion on the concept of crucibles focuses on how immigration affects the American society and how to reach immigrants. The crucible is equivalent to cultural adaptation and complete assimilation of European immigrants.The discussion focuses on the difference between the two approaches to immigration. Will Angro Protestants like Henry Ford or Woodrow Wilson, or all of them, Mayflower descendants and Sicilian, Ashkenazi and Slovaks react to each other and all will change? " The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him.

For centuries the United States has provided individuals with citizens a personal opportunity and has brought hope to many people around the world. Immigrants went to the country to express their religious beliefs and hope that they will not be tried or punished. The newly discovered American residents thought of an opportunity full of "American dreams". This dream brings people of different races together, allowing them to interact and ultimately accept each other. This edition of American history is more than just the truth. It is no coincidence that immigrants come to America to find economic opportunities. The scientific and technical outcomes of the United States are worthy of praise and they are also due to the openness and vitality of the American political order. However, the past success of the United States is due to the unique strengths of the United States. This new country is fortunate to have rich natural resources and a navigable river. Fortunately, apart from other major powers, fortunately the local population has not advanced so much and it is very sensitive to diseases in Europe. This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. This is the subject of important academic criticism, but this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups.

The United States is sometimes called "crucible", "land of opportunity" and "land of freedom". These names recognize that the country consists of various ethnic groups from various parts of the world. These names symbolize the opportunity for those who wish to "restart" the United States in many ways. Foreign laborers are claimed to be receiving work from citizens and foreign residents, but immigrants are generally considered economic gains. Our text says, "A lot of research has been undertaken, and if migrant workers meet jobs not eligible for other jobs, it indicates that the citizen's overall wage will rise. America is a unique place: a young country intertwined with the clues of successful immigrants. As the "crucible" in the modern world, does the United States have opportunities to achieve diversification and unity issues? Is the purpose of the United States to find commonality of all races and prove their basic agreement? "The most important fact of the present time is that all men of different races are closely related and we are faced with two options: infinite competition or cooperation." Mumbai is always the crucible of career opportunities. People gathered from all over the country gather here to pursue their dreams. The business-oriented workplace culture, fast paced lifestyle, and high standard of living are the ideal cornerstone for individuals trying to achieve their career goals. As the center of technology in India, Bangalore has established a true heritage. Hyderabad and Gurgaon are other places that witnessed prosperity in this area. Companies such as Google, Accenture, Wipro, Infosys, etc. are headquartered in both cities. The pool of available technical talent is also very big. India is one of the oldest civilizations in history. It is rich in history and spirit. It is a melting pot of cultural identity and socio-economic demographics that can produce synergistic effects. Food is one of the main focus of Indian society, but priorities and styles often depend on regional preferences. For example, the food of Rajasthani is rich and luxurious like the kings of the day and magnificent magnificence. On the other hand, Gujarat Food focuses on simple and nutritious foods to increase the efficiency of farmers who need land. This view of crucibles is carried out through self-recognition of the United States. We believe that we are immigrants from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first permanent pioneer was White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Then each country followed a similar story and then studied the generations of mainstream culture, English, adopted the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to America in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it.

Perhaps the "crucible" myth gained power during the Industrial Revolution. As millions of immigrants enter the United States, American culture is changing. Americans set high standards for society and hope that everyone will be accepted. Society needs to live in a civil society that creates "American dreams" together, which will lead to prosperity. Many immigrants who moved to the United States brought various cultural traditions, but after moving, they held down this belief and opened up a new "American way of thinking". The rituals and traditions of these societies should bring diversity to the culture of this country. I think that we are watching the last breath of the myth of the crucible in America. When I grew up, we were taught to believe in assimilation: if all Americans look different, then it will eventually make a noise. This is an estimate of the public (I believe that we are witnessing the end of the mass media business model in the pain of publishing and broadcasting in the Internet age and witnessing the end of the mass concept). When most people look like you, the rules of most people look good; the armed forces of trumps worry that they will soon be a minority This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. This is the subject of important academic criticism, but this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups. A permanent myth about American culture is the mystery that America became the "crucible" of the world. The author revealed the mystery of this myth and corrected the wrong image with a series of certain facts that span the history of the country. Therefore, the reader will leave this book to Americans who are tolerant of their immigrants in various ways. Indeed, American social experiments in cultural pluralism and multiculturalism may be close to the apex of other parts of the world. However, if you use the other parts as an indicator, you can set the success criteria as low as possible. What is America's unique approach to cultural diversity? More importantly (though often forgotten) is not the emergence of abstract cultural pluralism, but its importance is on the ground.

In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like America, the former identity was after you became a new American identity. As all the US share this commonality, this will create a more homogeneous type of country. In multicultural or mosaic countries such as Canada, everyone appreciates each other's difference and Canadian identity. It sounds better than the other, but neither ideal has both advantages and disadvantages. - Because everyone is initially considered an American, conflicts and tensions between ethnic groups may be reduced - You must put your cultural identity on your new American identity (this can cause indignation) - Because generations are fully assimilated into American culture, after several generations families will lose all parts of tradition and customs. - Many people live in the apartheid community, which leads to tensions and violence between different ethnic groups - It respects the differences from the legacy of each person, I believe that summarizing these differences will bring benefits to Canada and the country will be stronger - There are many religious, ethnic and cultural diversity, which means that Canadians are more receptive and open - We hold various events throughout the year to celebrate various cultural and cultural / religious festivals. - Many Canadian people are bilingual or multilingual in different languages, which is an important part of culture. - In some communities, some ethnic groups may alienate themselves in their own areas, which will compromise the status of mosaicism - The legal system is "crucible". In other words, there are various cultures in Canada, but the court applies to the UK and France legal system. - Cultural identity may conflict with Canadian identity or other well-known Canadian cultural identity Every ideology has the same advantages and disadvantages. According to a survey conducted in Canada, about a third of Canadians support Mosaic's idea. For Quebec - Canadians, Alberta and people aged 55 and over, the furnace is most beneficial. Mosaic reacts best to British Columbia houses and mosaics from 18 to 34 years old. It shows that age and your growth age will affect your taste. In this article I will explain issues related to law enforcement issues and cultural diversity topics. It addresses the challenges facing law enforcement officials. I will explain mosaic theory and furnace theory. It even discusses diversity from a historical point of view. The authors of this document also discuss the proper role of law enforcement agencies in dealing with undocumented immigrants. Students who major or are in charge of public policy, law or criminal justice can think that this is an excellent source of information and can write according to their thesis. In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to John Murray Gibbon 's book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938, and in the drama "crucible" of Zangwill 1908, the crucible appeared in the public consciousness. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like America, the former identity was after you became a new American identity. As all the US share this commonality, this will create a more homogeneous type of country. In multicultural or mosaic countries such as Canada, e

Canada is a country made up of cultural mosaics, not cultural melts, and I am proud in both domestic and abroad. Mosaic is based on our belief that the whole of Canada is getting stronger as immigrants bring their cultural diversity to all Canadians. The crucible of the culture used in the United States, once they landed on the American coast no matter who they were, they are all Americans, expecting to adopt and follow the American way I will tell immigrants. The center of society in Canada is our legal system. Our legal system is based on the common law model in the UK, which is based on a value system strictly observing the procedural rules on substantive matters in front of the courts. Because the Canadian model is based on priority, the court is reluctant to do something never been done. As a result, Canadian courts have difficulty in adopting or recruiting new ideas and social conventions. From a cultural point of view, the Canadian legal system adopts a "melting furnace" approach. In other words, our legal system does not accept culturally unique dispute resolution methods. Instead, our legal system imposes value on everyone coming. For example, in a separate case of a family, the court applies the UK or French legal system, but the concept of whether or not different cultures and people are different in Canada and whether it means separate family membership is always reflected in court decisions It is not necessarily done. When making decisions, the courts do not always assume the obligation to consider cultural values. One of the problems posed by this dichotomy is how Canada's legal system is more flexible in accepting the different values ​​of controversial solutions. Randy Levin is a family lawyer in charge of family law and arbitration in Cranbrook, British Columbia. Gifty Serbeh-Dunn is a cross-cultural consultant at Wayne Dunn & Assoc. In this article I will explain issues related to law enforcement issues and cultural diversity topics. It addresses the challenges facing law enforcement officials. I will explain mosaic theory and furnace theory. It even discusses diversity from a historical point of view. The authors of this document also discuss the proper role of law enforcement agencies in dealing with undocumented immigrants. Students who major or are in charge of public policy, law or criminal justice can think that this is an excellent source of information and can write according to their thesis. In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to John Murray Gibbon 's book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938, and in the drama "crucible" of Zangwill 1908, the crucible appeared in the public consciousness. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like America, the former identity was after you became a new American identity. As all the US share this commonality, this will create a more homogeneous type of country. In multicultural or mosaic countries such as Canada, everyone appreciates each other's difference and Canadian identity. It sounds better than the other, but neither ideal has both advantages and disadvantages.

Cultural diversity and impossibility of true melting US core criteria are in principle based on civic diversity and equality. Starting with its declaration of independence, the United States stands out by establishing a male state equivalent to but different from other contemporary nation states. However, despite the fact that the unified image of the United States is being projected both at home and abroad, the idea behind E Pluribus Unum did not echo as people imagined. The society in which we live has been called "crucible" for centuries, and this theory is still correct. But today, this situation is totally different. Our diversity is related not only to ethnic background but also to the diversity of ideas. Thus, when people are watching the Grammy award without being told, this element may be essential for the artist's information sharing their views. In countries where your way of thinking is significantly different from other people 's thinking, you can not discuss the opinions correctly without asking other people' s opinions. As they represent the opinion that many people agree or have never heard before, we no longer stop artists from using their platform to stimulate discussion of important issues You can not. Traditionally our attitude towards diversity is assimilation. America has always been known as a "big melt pot" society. The newbies of this country are expected to match the values ​​and culture of the "old world" to the values ​​and lifestyles of the "new world". Cultural differences are metaphorically placed in a large pot, where they "melt" or mix. In theory, "crucible" brings culture, language, and way of life to everyone in this country. Today, the terms "mosaic" and "TOSSALADA" are replacing the concept of "dissolving pot". In "mosaic" society, individuals maintain their own cultural patterns such as language, lifestyle, religious customs. The differences are highly appreciated when countless colored stones together form a mosaic, or when maintaining the shape, color and taste of a salad from which carrots, lettuce, cucumbers, peppers, tomatoes have been thrown.

In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to John Murray Gibbon 's book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938, and in the drama "crucible" of Zangwill 1908, the crucible appeared in the public consciousness. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. For a long time Canadian primary school students have taught big events for their big country. "The United States is a crucible," they declared. "Canada is a mosaic." This is the meaning of pride; in Canada there is a persistent belief that immigrants may still mostly assimilate. Mosaic provides uniqueness if the furnace needs to be integrated. In Canada, the pressure on immigrants that suppress race and become the mainstream of society is not obvious. In fact, many immigrants live different lives in the second largest foreign country in the world (after Australia). They live together, talking about their mother tongue and practicing customs. Some people never learn functional English or French (Canadian two official languages), others accept civic life. Canada is a country made up of cultural mosaics, not cultural melts, and I am proud in both domestic and abroad. Mosaic is based on our belief that the whole of Canada is getting stronger as immigrants bring their cultural diversity to all Canadians. The crucible of the culture used in the United States, once they landed on the American coast no matter who they were, they are all Americans, expecting to adopt and follow the American way I will tell immigrants.

Zangwill (1908) wrote as follows. "God is creating Americans! ... The real Americans have not arrived yet, he is a fusion of all races" This is part of the drama "The Melting Pot". Israel Zangwill was a Jew who was born in the UK on January 21, 1864 in London, England. In addition to "crucible", Zangwill also used a pen to protect women's suffrage, Jewish liberation, assimilation and Zionism. When the immigrants from Europe started flooding the Atlantic to seek a better life, the idea of ​​the United States as a "crucible" of mankind appeared at the turn of the century. America is a country created and defined by immigrants, even if "crucible" is a metaphor, it is more evident in our field. However, the food that once dominated Manhattan has almost lost its history. Although it seems to be impossible now, the sea area around New York City is full of shellfish. When he arrived at the river finally named after his name, Henry Hudson wrote the number of fish to surprise him. The beach in Manhattan is full of oysters and clams, this is the last place of Lower Manhattan 's "Pearl Street" which was originally the original coastline. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him. This view of crucibles is carried out through self-recognition of the United States. We believe that we are immigrants from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first permanent pioneer was White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Then each country followed a similar story and then studied the generations of mainstream culture, English, adopted the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to America in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it.

1 America is an immigrant country. This is a place for people around the world to build a better life. Some immigrants brought their families. Some people bring in something they like. Only others have decisions. One thing that all immigrants bring is their culture. Human culture is the custom and belief that they possess. Human culture is closely related to the country where they grew up. It is closely related to family relationship. Many people come to the United States from various places all over the world. For this reason, many people call the United States a "crucible" of culture. The two "crucible" ideas compare the United States with a huge stock pot. All immigrants are ingredients added to the pan. All immigrants have their own preferences. After each immigrant comes to the U.S. they will contact other people. People understand each other's culture. This is the beginning of melting of American stockpots. Three American immigrants began colonies with Jamestown in 1607. In 1620, another group left England and founded a settlement in the United States. These people call themselves pilgrims. They are eager to go to places where they can freely practice religion. They want to get rid of the British government. Both teams are working hard to build a good solution & Lt; Tab / & gt; American culture is composed of foreign cultures. Some say that America is "crucible". All foreign cultures are integrated in this "crucible", creating this unique culture. However, these different cultures actually take time to dissolve and dissolve people. Ironically, some people do not melt at all. For example, people living in Chinatown say a single word, they are very energetic. On the other hand, some foreigners have to interact with other English-speaking people. They need time to adjust. They need time to get used to English. It is not a yellow brick road during the research period. This is very rough, especially for young people. Perhaps my parents' decision has arrived in the United States. They want their children to receive better education. Children of immigrants who are studying English at school have great expectations for their parents; parents may not speak English at all. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its position by accepting immigrants from different cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to disappear. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - The story of Edward Albi Zoo In Edward Albi's drama "The Story of the Zoo", Jerry is a strange story that the people he met will influence his shallow and sad presence to prove Albi Is that society is indifferent, unfriendly, helpless, unnecessarily consumed and empty. In order to make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry communicates the lives of some people in his host family to Peter. The prospect of this furnace is run through self-recognition of the United States. We believe our country is an immigrant from all over the world. The furnace means that a lot of ingredients are added to the pan, and as a result all mixtures create a new taste or a unique American culture. But that is not the case. Our story is very different. The first settlers were White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) from the UK. They created the American culture, after which immigrants followed it. Immigrants bring their own culture and language. Later, each country follows a similar story, adopts the mainstream cultural approach of following generations learning English and adopting the white Anglo-Saxon approach. For example, the largest ethnic group who emigrated to the United States in the 19th century came from Germany. But what about the Germans in America? We have German restaurant from Germany and Christmas habit. But that's it.

In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to John Murray Gibbon 's book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938, and in the drama "crucible" of Zangwill 1908, the crucible appeared in the public consciousness. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. For a long time Canadian primary school students have taught big events for their big country. "The United States is a crucible," they declared. "Canada is a mosaic." This is the meaning of pride; in Canada there is a persistent belief that immigrants may still mostly assimilate. Mosaic provides uniqueness if the furnace needs to be integrated. In Canada, the pressure on immigrants that suppress race and become the mainstream of society is not obvious. In fact, many immigrants live different lives in the second largest foreign country in the world (after Australia). They live together, talking about their mother tongue and practicing customs. Some people never learn functional English or French (Canadian two official languages), others accept civic life. Canada is a country made up of cultural mosaics, not cultural melts, and I am proud in both domestic and abroad. Mosaic is based on our belief that the whole of Canada is getting stronger as immigrants bring their cultural diversity to all Canadians. The crucible of the culture used in the United States, once they landed on the American coast no matter who they were, they are all Americans, expecting to adopt and follow the American way I will tell immigrants. People have said that the United States is a crucible for a long time. I am an American who grew up in Canada and is a metaphor of a mosaic, as opposed to a crucible of culture. Canadians use this metaphor to describe social and political norms and respect and respect the diversity and uniqueness of the various immigrants' indigenous cultures deeply rooted in Canadian citizens. I began to believe that our crucible was addicted by the dangers of who we are and the lies about the department. This is a lie of Hongzhou and Lanzhou. It began to appear in the George W Bush election in 2000 and since then it has become the cornerstone of the American story. It links historical, Democratic and Republican 's left and right consciousness and statistics, and distorts the truth of both.

In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to the book "Canadian Mosaics" published by John Murray Gibbon in 1938 and the crucible in Zangwill 's 1908 Israeli drama' s "melting furnace" It appeared. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. Many Canadians believe that the crucible is the opposite of mosaic and official multiculturalism. However, as discussed by the participants of the roundtable discussion, when looking at the daily reality of North American cultural diversity, these two ideologies have much in common and obscure many similarities. In this open roundtable discussion, five historians from the United States and Canada discussed the origins and development of the myths of these countries. Grace Delgado continues to show the importance of crucibles to the concept of citizenship. She studied how Arizona is currently mobilizing the idea of ​​state ownership and exclusion. Patricia Burke Wood compares the concept of a mosaic and a furnace and associates them with today's multiculturalism. She criticized the simplicity of the words and emphasized their lofty idealism. Russell Cazal dates back to racist ideas in Los Angeles in the 1940's and studied the beginnings of Canadian and American terminology multiculturalism. Randy Widis proposed the concept of interculturalism. David Atkinson clarifies the origins of the American crucible and emphasizes its importance in building a nation. He also talked about how many people, especially Randolph Born, challenged the crucible myths of the early 20 th century. This roundtable discussion is part of the seminar funded by SSHRC held at Glendon College in late October 2012. Benjamin Bryce is a doctoral student at the University of History of York University. He published articles and book chapters on immigration, ethnicity and language policy issues in Canada and Argentina. In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like America, the former identity was after you became a new American identity. As all the US share this commonality, this will create a more homogeneous type of country. In multicultural or mosaic countries such as Canada, everyone appreciates each other's difference and Canadian identity. It sounds better than the other, but neither ideal has both advantages and disadvantages. In the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to John Murray Gibbon 's book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938, and in the drama "crucible" of Zangwill 1908, the crucible appeared in the public consciousness. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This reflects how many Canadians and Americans think about integration and cultural and linguistic diversity. In this open roundtable discussion, five historians from the United States and Canada discussed the origins and development of the myths of these countries. Grace Delgado continues to show the importance of crucibles to the concept of citizenship. She studied how Arizona is currently mobilizing the idea of ​​state ownership and exclusion. Patricia Burke Wood compares the concept of a mosaic an

Unum »means" one from many people "from today, mainly means a complex relationship between the Federal Union and 50 sovereign nations and the central government. However, this sentence arises from different versions of the seal proposed by Benjamin Franklin in the early American Revolutionary War. His designs are lined up on the shields, six European people who occupy the majority of whites in new countries, such as the UK, Scots, Irish, German, Dutch, and French (') It represents the emblem of. In this case, "E Pluribus Unum" clearly states something other than a constitutional arrangement. It is recognized that the survival of a new government depends on the ability to build a nation from racial diversity to its normal population. The seal of "E Pluribus Unum" and Franklin reflects the majority of the paradox and ambiguity in the concept of American citizenship. On the one hand, the motto means that people stand out from a lot of people. On the other hand, the shield indicates that the composition group maintains their individuality. Therefore, the desire to completely eliminate the disparity and make social energy attributable to racial racists presents an alternative model to establish American citizenship. The former is enveloped in the thought of "crucible", while the latter is creating a buzzword such as "cultural diversity". Neither "crucible" nor "cultural diversity" has been sufficiently successful to explain the formation of American citizenship. The adaptation process in the American history is different from the meaning of the word "melting furnace" and is more complicated, but flexibility due to group differences creates only certain aspects of "cultural pluralism". However, as these models have both prescription and explanation, the increase and decrease compared to other people not only provide important evidence but also provide real opinions to Americans, We also provide information on how you want to be. Important evidence America is a crucible of a mixture of race, nation and culture. Nonetheless, the first generation Americans found themselves at the intersection of accepting "Americans" - eliminating some ethnic-cultural links and contacting their ancestral culture I will keep in touch with you. I have never felt such a confrontation before I was 13 or 14 years old. To be Indian is as natural and important as me for Americans. There is no struggle; I am proud of two aspects of my identity. The situation changed when I was a high school student. I began to see the color, paying attention to the names of "strange" and "ethnic", compared with my colleagues. I am from a diversified town in South Asia with many populations, but I still feel that I am strange. For people of color it feels difficult in traditional "white" American houses. But why is the US always white in my head? The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its position by accepting immigrants from different cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to disappear. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - The story of Edward Albi Zoo In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry told Peter a strange story that the people he met had influenced his shallow and sad presence to prove Albi That viewpoint is that society is indifferent, unfriendly, helpless, unnecessarily consumed and empty. In order to make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry communicates the lives of some people in his host family to Peter.

Mosaic of American culture is an action consisting of several important elements such as languages, religion, race and ethnicity, clothing and politics, which is not the furnace culture. Culture is what he / she does in her daily life. To understand others, we must first remember that each culture has its own set of values ​​and assumptions. Culture is constantly changing, constantly changing civilization, there are several different groups. For immigrants, the United States is an opportunistic country and to the rest of the world it is the best country in the world for its economic success and democratic political system. During the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to the book "Canadian Mosaics" published by John Murray Gibbon in 1938 and the crucible in the "crucible" of Zangwill's 1908 drama in Israel appeared in the public consciousness It was. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This shows that many Canadians and Americans are seeing convergence and cultural and linguistic diversity. People have said that America is a crucible for a long time. I am an American who grew up in Canada and is a metaphor of mosaic as opposed to a crucible of culture. Canadians use this metaphor to describe social and political norms and respect and respect the diversity and identity of the various immigrants' indigenous cultures deeply rooted by Canadian citizens. I began to believe that our crucible had been addicted to by the lies about the dangers and categories of who we are. This is a lie of Hongzhou and Lanzhou. It began to appear in the George W Bush election in 2000 and has become the cornerstone of the story of the United States. It links historical, Democratic and Republican's left and right consciousness and statistics, and distorts the truth of both. Another early usage of the term mosaic to refer to Canadian society is John Murray Gibbon which published the book "Canadian Mosaics" in 1938. The gibbons obviously deny the concept of an American furnace. He believes that the crucible is a process encouraged by immigrants and their descendants to block connections with their country and their culture of culture to integrate into American lifestyles. In 1965, John Porter published his influential sociological research, Vertical Mosaic: Canadian Social Class and Power Analysis. Porter's book shows that some groups (such as British group) are better at revenue, education and health than other groups. For example, with these methods, the origin of Eastern Europe and Southern Europe is not very good. The worst thing is indigenous people and Inuit. Porter believes that this vertical arrangement is related to power and influence in decision making.

Canada is an internationally recognized culturally diverse country and emphasizes the concept of "mosaic". No other country has a resident from so many different backgrounds that shows strong loyalty to Canada while preserving its cultural heritage. This is in stark contrast to the idea of ​​an American "crucible" trying to make all citizens fixed. It is believed that the philosophy of Canada is more effective and respected than the philosophy of neighboring countries in the United States. During the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to the book "Canadian Mosaics" published by John Murray Gibbon in 1938 and the crucible in the "crucible" of Zangwill's 1908 drama in Israel appeared in the public consciousness It was. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This shows that many Canadians and Americans are seeing convergence and cultural and linguistic diversity. In this article I will explain the pros and cons of mosaic and furnace theory. First, I will explain the two ideologies. In the "crucible" country like the United States, you had the former identity after you became a new American identity. Everyone in the United States shares this commonality, creating a more homogeneous country. In a multicultural or mosaic country such as Canada, everyone like the Canadians highly appreciate the difference and identity of each other. It sounds better than the other, but both ideals have both advantages and disadvantages. People have said that America is a crucible for a long time. I am an American who grew up in Canada and is a metaphor of mosaic as opposed to a crucible of culture. Canadians use this metaphor to describe social and political norms and respect and respect the diversity and identity of the various immigrants' indigenous cultures deeply rooted by Canadian citizens. I began to believe that our crucible had been addicted to by the lies about the dangers and categories of who we are. This is a lie of Hongzhou and Lanzhou. It began to appear in the George W Bush election in 2000 and has become the cornerstone of the story of the United States. It links historical, Democratic and Republican's left and right consciousness and statistics, and distorts the truth of both.

This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. Although this is the subject of important academic criticism, this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy, and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups. In this open roundtable discussion, five historians from the United States and Canada discussed the origins and development of the myths of these countries. Grace Delgado continues to show the importance of crucibles to the concept of citizenship. She studied how Arizona is currently mobilizing the idea of ​​state ownership and exclusion. Patricia Burke Wood compares the concept of a mosaic and a furnace and associates them with today's multiculturalism. She criticized the simplicity of the words and emphasized their lofty idealism. This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. Although this is the subject of important academic criticism, this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy, and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups. A permanent myth about American culture is the mystery that America became the "crucible of the world". The author revealed the mystery of this myth and corrected the wrong image with a series of certain facts that span the history of the country. Therefore, the reader will make this book quite different from Americans' attitudes toward their immigrants. Indeed, American social experiments in cultural pluralism and multiculturalism may be close to other parts of the world. However, if you use the other parts as an indicator, you can decide the success criteria as low as possible. What is America's unique approach to cultural diversity? More importantly (though often forgotten) is not the emergence of abstract cultural pluralism, but its importance is on the ground.

Bharati Mukherjee stands among new novelists in the field of Indian literature. Her explanation of her overseas expatriate experience and its impact on women makes it possible for readers to understand the lives of South Asians living in the United States now. The aim of this paper is to study how Barady · McSuzy catches the chaos of "American crucibles" of American Indian Immigrants in her short stories and novels. Family safety and desire for the comfort of our own culture causes a conflict that only those born in the third world can understand this conflict which is the choice of living in the West. Bharati Mukherjee (1940) is a representative of an Indian American who is one of the decisive fictitious female writers of post-modernist literature. Bharati Mukherjee became a powerful member of American literary circles in novels such as The Tiger's Daughter (1972), Jasmine (1989), Wife (1975), Middleman and Other Stories (1988), Darkness. (1985) "The World's Holders" (1993) and "Leave to Me" (1997) are two other novels by Bharati Mukherjee. The inhuman tendency of post-visual writers and negative ability, the case of non-traditional experience is a major problem in future separation. Baratti's approach to express her sense of life is not a sensitivity but a combination of loneliness and alienation. Immigrant female writers are always emphasizing links between their body, immigration experience and identity formation. In the case of Bharati Mukherjee, her novel is inevitable in autobiographical elements. Her protagonist reflects the fight against her own identity, from the exile in India, and Indian Indian in Canada, and finally American immigrants. "Rudnick, Lois Palken, Judith E. Smith, and Rachel Rubin." American Identity: Getting Started, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006: 1 Bharati Mukherjee Born from Parents of Far East Hinduism in Kolkata, India, her mother who got married at the age of 16 encouraged him to go on to college and find a career. MUKHERJEE, BHARATI (1940-) Bharati Mukherjee grew up in Calcutta, studied at Calcutta and the University of Barroda and acquired a master's degree in English and ancient Indian culture. She moved to the United States in 1961 to attend the Iowa writer seminar and finally got a master's degree and a doctorate from the University of Iowa. From 1968 to 1972, she lived in Canada; after returning to the United States she began writing seriously. She commented that she became a US citizen in 1988 and feels that she belongs to the United States. Mukherjee wrote two short stories, Darkness (1985) and The Middleman (1987), seven novels, Desirable Daughters (2002) and The Tree Bride (2004), and some non-works, two of them It was. It was written by her husband, writer Clark Blythe. His wife Panna went to America for study and in a while my husband went home to visit her. Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion)

The United States is a country mainly assimilated to immigrants, its history goes back more than 200 years ago. Or at least it was once. Today, Americans are Americans and their houses retain their cultural identity. The United States is a country where multiculturalism and ethnicity are thrown at will, yet it is still the whole. The word salad bowl seems to be inappropriate. We were once considered crucibles, a mixture of multicultural and American racial. We are American, the place of birth is irrelevant. Because I am in the US, this is our culture. Assimilation never means "crucible", and everyone "melted" into a homogeneous "America" ​​stew. As political scientist Peter Skerri wrote, "assimilation" means "migrants adapt and change in various fields, meaning they will reject migrants in the past (see parents' mother tongue To forget English and to speak English) and other aspects of their heritage (ethnic cuisine, specific religious festivals, family tradition from the motherland) "This is a generational generation It includes a fair ambiguity. The sense of loss of tradition and spiritual exile is combined with the advantage of becoming a middle class of the United States. Each negotiation has two aspects. It is the real "crucible" of American politics, bringing delicious and volumeful stew. The weak diversification of the current American leftist is not "weak tea" but people who have diverse backgrounds are necessary to dilute the party's agenda and the deep belief in concrete ideology. It has some nutrients and weak medicinal value, but it is ultimately unsatisfactory. It is also not the current "spicy pepper" of American rights - a bold but very simple mixture of only a few ingredients. People who disagree and "do not like me" do not simply "worry". This is a powerful and spicy national populism. It is far from the somewhat complicated version of the previous conservative tradition. Americans sometimes feel that our cultural diversity is very painfully conscious. We used to call a multilingual country "crucible", but today we do not use much of the assimilation metaphor such as "assimilation simmering" or "throwing salad". But even how good or bad (we still do not agree with the proper cultural method), we made amazing changes in the geographical context and its associated beliefs and behavior patterns. Of course, it all started in the colonial era. In a broader sense it started faster and the first human beings adventured through a crossover between Northeast Asia and the northwestern part of the United States. Prior to the last ice ages, the diversity of mankind necessarily accompanied a wide range of immigrants that reached thousands of years later; when the "old world" people first reached the eastern coastal region in the 16th century, the United States Broad culture already owned - institutions, customs, beliefs that reflect and shape who we are.

Every country in the Canadian world, the crucible of the 21st century, has its own cultural identity. The reason for making Canada more unique than in other countries is that it is the crucible of many other cultures. When all these cultures gather and come into contact with each other, each culture prove unique identity, but it is somewhat compatible with other cultures. This may lead to people with different ethnic groups not linking this way well, but there is still a strong connection between individuals and their roots. During the past century, "mosaic" and "crucible" appeared in North America as a concept to explain the relationship between Canadian and American with immigrant and cultural diversity. The origin of the word mosaic can be traced back to the book "Canadian Mosaics" published by John Murray Gibbon in 1938 and the crucible in the "crucible" of Zangwill's 1908 drama in Israel appeared in the public consciousness It was. These two concepts are still thoughtful about history and are still powerful today. They contain beliefs about collective ownership, upward liquidity and citizenship. These two phrases actually represent national ideology. This shows that many Canadians and Americans are seeing convergence and cultural and linguistic diversity. Every country in the Canadian world, the crucible of the 21st century, has its own cultural identity. The reason for making Canada more unique than in other countries is that it is the crucible of many other cultures. What happens when all these cultures come together and touching each other is that each culture proves its own identity but somewhat compatible with other cultures. People have said that America is a crucible for a long time. I am an American who grew up in Canada and is a metaphor of mosaic as opposed to a crucible of culture. Canadians use this metaphor to describe social and political norms and respect and respect the diversity and identity of the various immigrants' indigenous cultures deeply rooted by Canadian citizens. I began to believe that our crucible had been addicted to by the lies about the dangers and categories of who we are. This is a lie of Hongzhou and Lanzhou. It began to appear in the George W Bush election in 2000 and has become the cornerstone of the story of the United States. It links historical, Democratic and Republican's left and right consciousness and statistics, and distorts the truth of both.

"Large furnace" When you live in an area, you will begin accepting other cultures around you many times. No matter which state you live in, many cultures are mixed. Many people integrate other cultures of the surrounding people into their own culture. I live in many states and I can experience this on my own. All my friends learned about the culture around them from family and friends. I have always watched culture fusing. The United States is widely regarded as a "crucible" of many generations. This country has acquired its status by accepting immigrants from various cultures, shaping and integrating American lifestyles. However, the concept of "Big Melt Pot" in the United States began to fade away. According to a "Newsweek" poll, "Only 20% believe the United States is a crucible" (Morganthau and Wolfberg, paragraph 4). - Edward Albi Zoo Story In Edward Albi's drama "The Tale of the Zoo", Jerry says a strange story that the people he encounters influence on his shallow and sad presence to prove what Albi believes Society is unnecessarily indifferent, unkind, helpless, and empty. To make Peter understand that his life is full of emptiness and shallowness, Jerry tells Peter the lives of some people who were with him. Figure 1: What are melted peaches and unmelted peaches? (Left) Melt pulp becomes soft and fibrous pulp when aged. When slicing, they tend not to retain their shape. Melted meat can be clay or free stone. (Right) Unmelted pulp has a firm aging degree. Most commercial canned cultivars are non-melting, and all non-melted cultivars are viscous. Photo courtesy: University of California Davis manages known melting / unmelting genes and free stone / single stone genes (Figure 2). This is the so-called Freestone-Melting physical site on No. 4 nuclear fruit (Ogundiwin et al., 2009). This gene (endoPG) encodes a cell wall pectin cleavage enzyme called endopolygalacturonase and exerts major fruit softening effect in many other fruit crops. Like pears, avocados, melons

Step 2: Place each of these materials in a cardboard box or item that may function as an insulator. Step 3: Place the cube in each box and record the time it takes to melt compared to when you are outdoors My hypothesis is that using wax paper is the best way to prevent ice cubes from melting quickly. The best way to keep ice from melting is to put ice in a box with Styrofoam. Ice cube lasts 1 hour 4 minutes 39 seconds Even though I am familiar, my assumption is incorrect. This experiment is a little long, but it is also very interesting. I like this experiment very much. It is very simple and fun, so I recommend it to everyone. The experiment showed that the size of the surface melted the ice faster, but what if you try different ways to melt the ice? Please repeat this experiment in such a way as to melt the ice cube with hot water. When using hot water, please ask for the help of adults. Do you think that the result is different? Every time I try a new technology to melt a cube, I need to establish a new hypothesis to see if I am right. Once you are done, you can decide which ice cube keeps the drink coolest. Pouring hot water on ice is an easy way to melt. The warmer the water, the faster the ice melts. You can boil the pot water and put ice there, and you can also see the ice melt slowly as you pour water. The extreme contrast between heat and cold melts the ice quickly. Put the ice in the bowl and place it outside the sunshine. On a hot sunny day, the heat from the sun melts your ice in just a few minutes. On a cool day, it may take longer, but the sun can still do the job. Heat from the sun will melt the ice and will evaporate the water from the melted ice When Ice is melted in a glass of water, it is exposed to air and water. Ice in water melts faster than ice in the air, but as the ice melts the ice further sinks. If you support ice to prevent ice sinking, you can see that the ice underwater melts faster than the ice in the air.

Crushed ice helps to quickly cool down drinks. Therefore, restaurants that maintain beverages at room temperature tend to use crushed ice in drinks. These drinks were cold but partly diluted before being served If you consider all very small ice cubes that are used to cool drinks, its surface area is so large that the effect of crushing ice is good. Because I have drinks in the refrigerator, it is not the purpose to cool drinks or prevent drinks from getting hot. I will use these, the ice has a longer life span and the drink will be diluted to a lower level. The reason is that the volume is larger than ordinary ice, so it can absorb more heat without melting. Pouring hot water on ice is an easy way to melt. The warmer the water, the faster the ice melts. You can boil the pot water and put ice there, and you can also see the ice melt slowly as you pour water. The extreme contrast between heat and cold melts the ice quickly. Put the ice in the bowl and place it outside the sunshine. On a hot sunny day, the heat from the sun melts your ice in just a few minutes. On a cool day, it may take longer, but the sun can still do the job. Heat from the sun will melt the ice and will evaporate the water from the melted ice When Ice is melted in a glass of water, it is exposed to air and water. Ice in water melts faster than ice in the air, but as the ice melts the ice further sinks. If you support ice to prevent ice sinking, you can see that the ice underwater melts faster than the ice in the air. Have you ever seen ice melting? The process of shrinking and expanding water is an attractive process during freezing and thawing. Perhaps you may have noticed that the ice in the drink dissolves quickly if they are shaped other than in other shapes. Is the shape of ice really different? Assuming the room is above the freezing point, the surface area of ​​the ice absorbs heat from the room and melts the ice. How can I melt the ice fast? How can I melt it more slowly?

You can use felt as it prevents melting of ice by acting as a natural insulation material. Compared to other materials, it keeps warm air flowing and lasts the corner ice for a long time. Radiation barriers or reflective barriers prevent heat transfer by thermal radiation. However, thermal energy can also be transmitted by conduction or convection, and the radiation barrier does not necessarily prevent conduction or convection heat transfer. Glass fiber - glass fiber insulation is an artificial building material used to limit thermal change. It has nothing to do with it. Foam - Spray foam insulation is an insulation sprayed in places where it is difficult to reach walls and hands. Robust and robust household insulation is essential to reduce heating and cooling costs and to prevent damage from moisture and pests. Aluminum foil - Aluminum foil is widely used for insulation (barrier and reflection), heat exchanger (heat conduction), and cable lining (barrier and conductive). This is a very good conductor Ice cubes can be pasted. It will not dissolve completely, but keep it cool and keep it longer than other materials. Polystyrene foam can also be used to prevent melting of ice. It keeps the light away, so it will not melt soon You can invent the insulator. To protect the ice cube, you may even be able to make boxes made of insulation. When heat is transferred to a solid such as ice, the temperature of the ice rises. When the temperature of ice reaches the critical value, ie 0 ° C (32 ° F) melting point, it can change from solid to liquid. In order to melt, the ice on the surface of the cube must receive enough heat to bring the temperature to 0 ° C. Pouring hot water on ice is an easy way to melt. The warmer the water, the faster the ice melts. You can boil the pot water and put ice there, and you can also see the ice melt slowly as you pour water. The extreme contrast between heat and cold melts the ice quickly. Put the ice in the bowl and place it outside the sunshine. On a hot sunny day, the heat from the sun melts your ice in just a few minutes. On a cool day, it may take longer, but the sun can still do the job. Heat from the sun will melt the ice and will evaporate the water from the melted ice When Ice is melted in a glass of water, it is exposed to air and water. Ice in water melts faster than ice in the air, but as the ice melts the ice further sinks. If you support ice to prevent ice sinking, you can see that the ice underwater melts faster than the ice in the air. Have you ever seen ice melting? The process of shrinking and expanding water is an attractive process during freezing and thawing. Perhaps you may have noticed that the ice in the drink dissolves quickly if they are shaped other than in other shapes. Is the shape of ice really different? Assuming the room is above the freezing point, the surface area of ​​the ice absorbs heat from the room and melts the ice. How can I melt the ice fast? How can I melt it more slowly?

"The battle of King Arthur from Monty Python is looking for the Holy Grail, and while the modern hero is far from that, it cries, but its essence remains the same. Many aspects of culture have been completely altered, but the social life of the hero is still there. Everyone, this is the perfect expression of his own culture and has an unparalleled ancient idol. Recently, social change is very big, it depends on dozens of heroes. As she has a lot of culture, the United States is regarded as the world, "a melting pot of race." Evolution hero Heroes: At the time, and now heroes have changed the evolution of the hero in many ways. change. As time goes on, as the society evolved, the hero's "power" and ability also evolved. As culture changes, its hero will change as well. A magnificent hero is a hero in early British literary epics. They are born heroes and are often summoned to depart from evildoers. A magnificent hero is for glory. The reason for their behavior is self-glory. Modern heroes are the heroes of today's culture that they became the people they wanted. They can become ordinary people who choose to do extraordinary things. They are often hidden and I do not want to admit their behavior. What becomes a hero? At the same time Epic Hero and the contemporary "H !!!!!!! Arthur Arthur Arthur Arthur Arthur Arthur - the - the - the - the - the - the - the - the - culture" has been completely changed, Hero's social life is still there Many aspects of everyone having an unparalleled ancient idol This is a perfect embodiment of his own culture Recently, It is big, but since it has a lot of culture, she regarded the United States as the world, "melting pot of a race." Because he depends on dozens of heroes, she can not have a hero a lot, but it did not choose a hero to embody a perfect culture, conversely, each hero, There have been many people who played an important role in society and contemporary culture, and everyone has a different phone on everyone's phone

Today 's United States more accurately represents the similarity of a salad bowl, not a furnace. The metaphor of furnace means that all the ingredients are combined to form a homogeneous mixture (everywhere the same); the salad bowl, although we all contribute to the flavor, each ingredient is still in its own Indicates that it is one. As Joel Swerdlow noted in his article "Change the United States", "10% of the 281 million inhabitants in the US were born in other countries, the largest percentage of US history" (Swerdlow). In my opinion, America has changed from a salad bowl society to a dissolving society. In this article I will further explain the implications of the furnace and salad ball. Let's compare the two perspectives, and finally show how America is suitable as a multi-ethnic society as a crucible. Before discussing whether the US is a salad bowl or a melting pot society it is important to pay attention to the exact meaning of the two terms. The furnace is the name of an American society, not emphasizing where people came from, what religion they are involved in, or how to live. It celebrates the idea that everyone is just an American and follows a strict American approach. When people are integrated into elements of a furnace society, they will blend with Americans Whether America is a salad bowl or a dissolving pot it will bring intense debate and controversy. The furnace is a society that does not emphasize the national background, and everyone will be the only Americans. The salad bowl, on the other hand, is a society in which differences in ethnic and cultural differences are remarkable and appreciated. In my opinion, America has changed from a salad bowl society to a dissolving society. In this article I will further explain the implications of the furnace and salad ball. Then, it compares the two views, and finally, it will show how the American label as a melting pot is suitable as a multi ethnic society.

Modernism poet EE Cummings, Wallace Stephens and TS Elliott, American modernist poet, such as EE Cummings, Wallace Stephens and TS Eliot, by changing destroying American culture, poetry changed European culture concept is American Face is much lower than changing poetry face. Through the true American concept these American poets have accomplished a feat to define the style of contemporary American poetry. The idea is a melting pot. New American poetry style, as American culture as being mixed with, beliefs and ideologies exist, is a new concept mix of old English style and international style. TS Elliot is a completely American Thomas Stearns Eliot (Thomas Stearns Eliot, September 26, 1888 St. Louis, Missouri, USA, January 4, 1965, London, England), American English poet, playwright, literary critic And the leader of modernism poet movement such as editor, "Wasted Land" (1922), "Quartet" (1943). From the 1920s to the end of the 21st century, Elliott had a strong influence on British American culture. Experiments of lexicon, style, poetry revived British poetry. In a series of important articles, he broke down the old legitimacy and established new legitimacy. Quartet's publication was awarded the Order of Honor and the Nobel Prize in literature in 1948, deeming him the greatest British poet and academic in the UK. Modernism poet EE Cummings, Wallace Stephens and TS Elliott, American modernist poet, such as EE Cummings, Wallace Stephens and TS Eliot, by changing destroying American culture, poetry changed European culture concept is American Face is much lower than changing poetry face. Through the true American concept these American poets have accomplished a feat to define the style of contemporary American poetry. The idea is a melting pot. New American poetry style, as American culture as being mixed with, beliefs and ideologies exist, is a new concept mix of old English style and international style.

Ice is a necessary condition to enjoy hot summer days, long trips and outdoor parties. If you do not feel cool, you can make your own ice with aluminum foil, insulation cloth like cloth, and glue. Please buy cardboard or plastic box to put ice. The size of the box depends on the amount of ice that needs to be transported. Cover the four sides of the box with aluminum foil, including the lid. Keep the shiny side of the foil away from the box as it reflects more light than the dim side. Paste the foil in place. The reflection characteristics of aluminum foil prevent heat and light from penetrating the box and guarantee the safety of ice. Use a foam or thick cloth (such as nylon) to cover the inside of the box. Thick material isolates the box from cold. This keeps the inside of the box at the same temperature as the ice for a long time. I completely sealed the box. Wrap more aluminum foil around the top of the box and the seam so that heat does not get into it. Do not open the box unless you plan to extract ice. This box can keep the ice cube safe for a limited melting for at least 4 hours To reduce the possibility of melting, please keep container as close to direct sunlight as possible. The more ice and other cold materials you put in the box, the lower the internal temperature of the box. Samantha Volz has been involved in writing news and information for over 8 years. She has a bachelor's degree in English from Lexington University in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and is a minor in European history. While in college he served as the editor in the student newspaper, and at professional internship as a full time journalist at Williamsport Sun-Gazette. She lives in Horsham, Pennsylvania. According to Sciencing.com, all you need is an aluminum foil to prevent ice melting over 4 hours. Purchase a container of plastic and cover it completely with aluminum foil (the shiny side faces outward), insulate the inside of the box with foam to prevent temperature escape from the container. Sciencing.com stated, "The thick material insulates the box and prevents the ice from escaping, which allows you to keep the inside of the box at the same temperature as the ice for a long time" and " Light will be transmitted through the box to prevent ice and keep it safe. " There are many ways to prevent ice melting during outdoor trips and activities. In addition to placing horn ice in a special ice bucket or insulated container, they should be placed in a cool and cool place to prevent the container from warming up. By keeping ice away from hot food and other sources of heat radiation, the ice melts slowly. Using large ice cubes and ice cubes will help you refrigerate food and drink for longer. Pouring hot water on ice is an easy way to melt. The warmer the water, the faster the ice melts. You can boil the pot water and put ice there, and you can also see the ice melt slowly as you pour water. The extreme contrast between heat and cold melts the ice quickly. Put the ice in the bowl and place it outside the sunshine. On a hot sunny day, the heat from the sun melts your ice in just a few minutes. On a cool day, it may take longer, but the sun can still do the job. Heat from the sun will melt the ice and will evaporate the water from the melted ice

We are a country of immigrants, America is a country of immigrants, melting pot of the people of the world. Discussions are being undertaken as to whether immigration claims and threat whether it will improve the lives of the United States. After my immigration procedure, my wife was an immigrant from Germany, so I already informed me that immigrants have improved the lives of the US. Multiculturalism strengthens our social structure and shapes our national ethics and social value. Immigration: We are an immigrant country. As an immigrant country, we are stronger. It continues to be a country welcoming immigrants from all over the world regardless of race or religion. Because of religious persecution, our founder escaped from their country in Europe. They found respect, consolation and protection here. It does not change now. Give us your weakness, oppressed and tired. The United States will open that weapon to you. That is the law of land. Education: If we do not give them world class education, we will delay youth to a viable and productive future. I failed. Without a sufficiently educated population, we can not compete economically or technically and we can not fill the gap of big skills in the future. So, from now on, all Americans who need it will receive free education through the university, government funding and sponsorship. Immigrants are the lifeblood of our great nation. We are a country established by immigration, and we are constantly revitalizing talent and culture brought about by newcomers and ideas. Immigrants expanded young and healthy workforce and balanced the aging of the labor force. The Immigration Society redefines itself (and their livelihoods) in a new country, so "The possibilities of new immigrants are twice that of non-immigrants." Children of immigrants and immigrants have created and led to "more than 40% of Fortune 500 companies." We are a country of immigrants, America is a country of immigrants, melting pot of the people of the world. Discussions are being undertaken as to whether immigration claims and threat whether it will improve the lives of the United States. After my immigration procedure, my wife was an immigrant from Germany, so I already informed me that immigrants have improved the lives of the US. - Explain the long-term implications of Australian immigration policy on its demographic structure (eg ethnicity, age and gender distribution, occupation structure etc). Perhaps 50,000 BC, the population of Australian indigenous people was probably about 250,000 to 300,000 from Asia and New Guinea.