This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. Although this is the subject of important academic criticism, this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy, and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups.
In this open roundtable discussion, five historians from the United States and Canada discussed the origins and development of the myths of these countries. Grace Delgado continues to show the importance of crucibles to the concept of citizenship. She studied how Arizona is currently mobilizing the idea of state ownership and exclusion. Patricia Burke Wood compares the concept of a mosaic and a furnace and associates them with today's multiculturalism. She criticized the simplicity of the words and emphasized their lofty idealism.
This article follows the development of the American "crucible" story. Although this is the subject of important academic criticism, this story is still a central myth and symbol of the American national identity. Discussion in Congress shows that it is useful to justify immigration policy, and popular discourse often quotes the symbolism of the furnace. The furnace description also resonates with the masses as it also includes US immigration experience and public unity. The article also emphasizes that this myth is built almost entirely around culture, ignoring the larger structural differences between ethnic groups.
A permanent myth about American culture is the mystery that America became the "crucible of the world". The author revealed the mystery of this myth and corrected the wrong image with a series of certain facts that span the history of the country. Therefore, the reader will make this book quite different from Americans' attitudes toward their immigrants. Indeed, American social experiments in cultural pluralism and multiculturalism may be close to other parts of the world. However, if you use the other parts as an indicator, you can decide the success criteria as low as possible. What is America's unique approach to cultural diversity? More importantly (though often forgotten) is not the emergence of abstract cultural pluralism, but its importance is on the ground.