The poor in the world is always a problem facing the world's generation and the gap between wealth and the poor is expanding, "What can we do to solve this problem?" In this article I will explain the moral meaning of resultantism and why Onora O'Neill's innocent opinion on this topic is more reasonable than the one following that of Peter Singer. I will explain the differences between Singer and O'Neill's views and their views. How is this global consequence different from what we call a part of the rule - consequentialism? A part of our so-called rule - resultism is morally wrong action - a combination of standardism rules and rules - a process of making decisions. A part of the rule so defined - resultualism defines the question as to when moral sanctions are appropriate. Some partial rules - resultant says it should be condemned and guilty unless the agent chooses the action that will bring the best results. Partial rule A more reasonable position for the resultantists is that regardless of whether they can not produce the maximum results when they choose actions prohibited by the rules and outcome decision process Good behavioral impact This is not the most common problem of global outcome. The most common problem is its maximizing behavior - the result of wrong standardism. According to this maximization criterion, the behavior is incorrect only if the maximum benefit can not be obtained. This standard judges that there are nothing bad for some behaviors, but that seems to be wrong, of course. It also judges some actions that seems not to be wrong. For example, consider a murder behavior that produces better results than any other action. According to the most familiar maximized behavior - misleading result - based criteria, this murder is not wrong. Many other actions, such as beatings, theft, promised destruction, liars, etc., may be wrong, even if doing something a bit better than not doing it. Likewise, the well-known, maximized behavioral performanceist format denies this.

Introduction This article deepens the theoretical understanding of four ethical frameworks: result-based, non-result-based, virtue ethics, and considerate ethics. When applied to the situation, these frameworks can help teachers resolve and justify their decisions. The goal is to apply the four frameworks to help Molly scenario create the most ethical action plan. Finally, the proposed action policy is justified. The main ethical problem in the aid Molly scenario is consistency between community sponsorship and school beliefs and initiatives. Therefore, we studied three major normative ethical theories: resultism, morality, and morality. We see that resultualism divides ethics into good result theory and correct behavior theory and taking correct action as a means to achieve good results. As a foundation of ethics, morality requires absolute order, not responsibility. It is not a result. Morality avoids the result and simple responsibility as a basic foundation of morality, and it contributes to the development of unique "moral" personality. Generalization and interpretation of ethical theory: resultism, morality, moral ethics and objectiveists ethical self-doctrine Introduction This article deepens the theoretical understanding of four ethical frameworks: result-based, non-result-based, virtue ethics, and considerate ethics. When applied to the situation, these frameworks can help teachers resolve and justify their decisions. The goal is to apply the four frameworks to help Molly scenario create the most ethical action plan. Finally, the proposed action policy is justified. - Summary In today's world, the criminal justice system faces many problems. Some of these problems include police corruption, abuse and fatal forces, tracking and deviation. Media influences public opinion and concerns about the moral and moral value of public leaders. (DeShon, 2000) There are two ignored and important issues of criminal justice system, honesty and truth, ie pledge and ethics.

The poor in the world is always a problem facing the world's generation and the gap between wealth and the poor is expanding, "What can we do to solve this problem?" In this article I will explain the moral meaning of resultantism and why Onora O'Neill's innocent opinion on this topic is more reasonable than the one following that of Peter Singer. I will explain the differences between Singer and O'Neill's views and their views. How is this global consequence different from what we call a part of the rule - consequentialism? A part of our so-called rule - resultism is morally wrong action - a combination of standardism rules and rules - a process of making decisions. A part of the rule so defined - resultualism defines the question as to when moral sanctions are appropriate. Some partial rules - resultant says it should be condemned and guilty unless the agent chooses the action that will bring the best results. Partial rule A more reasonable position for the resultantists is that regardless of whether they can not produce the maximum results when they choose actions prohibited by the rules and outcome decision process Good behavioral impact This is not the most common problem of global outcome. The most common problem is its maximizing behavior - the result of wrong standardism. According to this maximization criterion, the behavior is incorrect only if the maximum benefit can not be obtained. This standard judges that there are nothing bad for some behaviors, but that seems to be wrong, of course. It also judges some actions that seems not to be wrong. For example, consider a murder behavior that produces better results than any other action. According to the most familiar maximized behavior - misleading result - based criteria, this murder is not wrong. Many other actions, such as beatings, theft, promised destruction, liars, etc., may be wrong, even if doing something a bit better than not doing it. Likewise, the well-known, maximized behavioral performanceist format denies this.

In terms of moral dilemmas, people have their own opinions and ideas. There are many examples such as abortion, trolley problem, discussion about moral absoluteism, to name a few. In all of these examples, emotions and emotions seem to be beyond some important ethical decisions that need to be made. An important element of the moral dilemma is when and where it will emerge. As with the discussion of abortion, there are possibilities of several dilemmas, there is time to discuss all available options and ethical concepts. Meta - ethics: Meta - ethics is a moral field aimed at understanding moral attributes, moral assertions, attitudes and the nature of judgment. Meta-ethics as discipline attracts the attention of GE. In 1903, Moore's famous work "Principia Ethica" was the first detail of Moore's so-called naturalistic mistake. - Moral development ethics leads to individual decisions and actions. Broadly speaking, collective employee ethics forms the direction of the company. This document will explore the source of ethical influence of individuals and organizations. It will further summarize the ethical needs at the organizational level, how to meet the organization's direction and goals, and finally the influence of individual and organizational ethics on society. G.E. In 1903, the Moorish Principia Etica was generally regarded as a revolutionary research and set new challenges of ethics in the 20th century. However, this view of history is exaggerated. In meta ethics, Moore's non-naturalistic position is close to philosophers such as Henry Sidwick and other Hastings Rush dollars, other Franz Brentano and JME in the second half of the 19th century. In the situation McTaggart; normative ethics, his ideal resultantism reflects the views of Rashdall, Brentano, and McTaggart. But Principia Ethica showed her perspective with amazing energy and power. In particular, it causes more so - called meta - naturalistic naturalistic mistakes than Sidgwick and Rashdall and says they are damaging most of the former moral philosophy. For this reason, Moore's work has had an unbalanced influence on the moral philosophy of the 20th century. And still, H. It is the most famous expression of the general method of morality shared by later writers such as A. Prichard, W. D. Roth and C. D. Wide

Abstractism, morality, inevitable compromise Summary: Unlimited consequences are recently accepted. Discussion is justified. . A special tradeoff is to increase the speed limit of the interstate highway system. As a society, we seem to accept a trade-off for convenience. This consequential defense may be a style, but it sufficiently demonstrates multiple social decisions to challenge the non - resultant 's justification. Generally, the theory of result-basedism focuses on action. However, this is not necessarily the case. Rule - Resultism is a theory sometimes seen as an attempt to harmonize morality and consequence - in some cases this is called criticism of consequentialism based on rules. Like moralism, rule-based principles think that it is necessary to follow certain rules for ethical behavior. However, rule result principle selects the rule based on the result of selecting these rules. Rule resultismism exists in the form of rule utilitarianism and rule self-interest The theory of professional ethics, or moral theory is very different from the theory of consequences. In moral theory, if behavior is compliant with principle or moral rules, if you do not care about the overall impact, that action is correct. It is these actions that determine whether something is morally right or wrong. It is not the result of result-basedism. Morality is determined by reasonable perception of human responsibility to others (15). Kantoism or Kant ethics is an example of moral ethics, which belongs to the moral theory of rules. Kant said that in order for men to act morally correctly, they must act according to their own obligations. The motive for action ultimately determines whether action is ethical For a variety of reasons, the moral theory of moral decision-making is a different form than moral reasoning, not result-oriented. Contrary to resultsism, the moral theory of morality states that the correctness of action or decision does not depend solely on maximizing societal interests. On the contrary, morality defines the moral correctness or error mistake from the behavior itself, not the behavior of the result. Moral moral decision-making provides clear guidance on moral legitimacy and misbehavior that individuals use in their day-to-day choices. This moral moral guide focuses on individuals rather than maximizing social benefits. Indeed, if it prevents compliance with the ethical standards of the guidelines, morality actually has restrictions that prevent individuals from maximizing products.

The current utilitarianism is created by a combination of Jeremy Bentham's utilitarian account and John Stuart Mill's utilitarian account. The explanation of Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism mainly focuses on happiness. He recognizes the fundamental role of pain and happiness and approves or refutes action depending on the degree of pain or pleasure resulting from it, regards happiness and evil as pain, and whether happiness exceeds pain Utilitarianism is defined by measuring whether or not. "Naturally, there are several versions of different utilitarianism in some aspects of euthanasia, so there is no single" Utilitarian view ". Utilitarianism is a form of resultantism. In all actions opened to agents by action - utilitarianism, right action, the result is better, at least not worse, than any other action open to the agent. According to morality - utilitarianism the right behavior is an action that follows the rules and if the action is generally followed then the result will be better or not bad better than any other rule that you can normally follow in the relevant circumstances . (2003) Utilitarianism is a form of result-based and moral theory based on our goal of achieving the best overall results, taking into account all those affected by the decision. For Utilitarians, happiness - both in terms of pleasure, preference and desire - a major depreciation of value, pain, or desire, the main depreciation. Therefore, consider the administrative decision because minimizing overall pain and frustration, maximizing overall pleasure, or the animal under consideration may be affected is needed. Pain - and their welfare This view is important for wildlife management. Please do hunting as an example. In some cases, sports hunting is not morally acceptable for Utilitarians. Because it can cause pain in animals without creating comparable benefits to humans.

Even if he appeared and accepted her sister's life, the girl generously accepted the prince as her husband. At this point the prince's curse was broken, he became a handsome and brave young man. At his request, Meldina initially held his secret; however, she eventually could not control himself, revealed the real image of the prince to the king and the queen. After this, the elevated king was known as Wang Pig and abandoned the throne to his son who continued to dominate happily for many years. In the Italian character "The Pig King" written by Giovanni Francesco Straparola in the middle of the 16th century, the queen was cursed. My son, like a pig, until he got married three times. When he grew up, his mother convinced the first daughter of the poor family to marry him, but the girl was surprised at the game and tried to kill him at the wedding night. He trampled her in the hoof and killed. The same can be said to her sister. Then he married the youngest sister, she was very kind and accepted her new husband. In the evening he revealed himself to be himself a handsome young man who finally dominated the kingdom. Yes, despite the fact that he stabbed her two sisters with a hoof, the girl fell in love with him. In Italy, Giovanni Francesco Straparola released The Facetious Nights of Straparola in the 1550s. Known as the first European story including a fairy tale, it ended in 75 separate stories and was written for adults. Giulio Cesare Croce also announced the first 757 books for children in Russia in the late 16th century. An early example is ABC-Book, the first picture book published by Ivan Fodorov in 1571. The first picture book published in Russia, "Illustrated Pictorial" by Karion Istomin appeared in 1694. Peter 's interest in modernizing his country through westernization helped the literature of the western children of the 18th century to dominate this field. : 765 Catherine the Great Wrote a Fable for Children During her reign, Nicola Novikov founded the first youth magazine in Russia. : 765

Moral or moral philosophical research can describe the theory of whether it is right or wrong systematically. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where languages ​​and principles come from, and what they mean; it focuses on "moral ones" rather than "moral ones" I will set. And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Value theory focuses on the value of all varieties and the theoretical problem of good, which often goes beyond the boundary between normative ethics and meta ethics. It asks people to see if it is a person, idea, or thing, why and why they value something; therefore morality and nature are as important as value theory. The term "value theory" is used in philosophy in at least three different ways. In the broadest sense, "value theory" is a comprehensive label covering all areas of moral philosophy, social and political philosophy, aesthetics, and sometimes feminist and religious philosophy. In some areas. Aspect of "Evaluation" In the narrowest sense, "value theory" is used to regulate the ethical theory in a relatively narrow field, although not particularly limited. In a narrow sense, "value theory" is roughly synonymous with "value theory". You can think that value theory is mainly considering what is good and how good it is. For example, the problem of traditional value theory includes whether the value object is a subjective mental state or an objective state of the world. Moral or moral philosophical research can describe the theory of whether it is right or wrong systematically. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta - ethics studies our moral values ​​of where languages ​​and principles came from, and what they mean. And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on.

The field of ethics in Utilitarian philosophy is complicated, extensive and extremely controversial. It includes the concept of systematization, defense and review of good and evil. Philosophers usually divide ethics into three main parts: meta ethics, norm ethics, and applied ethics. Applied ethics is a field of ethics including analysis of controversial specific ethical issues such as abortion, animal rights, euthanasia. Normative ethics calls for ideal rules in the easiest way to try out the right behavior. As an abstract ethical theory, Utilitarianism has become one of several realistic options that must be considered, or it is refuted by any philosopher who has a place in normative ethics Or has been accepted. Utilitarianism now appears in various modifications and complex expressions. If that is not theoretically impossible, the ideal of Bentham 's happy calculation is generally considered practical. In the 20th century philosophers noticed other problems of Utilitarian programs. For example, one of them is the process of judging the influence of behavior. Conceptual and practical problems are related to processes that are regarded as impact, even if the value of these effects is not accurately quantified. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. Utilitarianism is often related to a more specific doctrine of Bentham and Mill. They measure the resulting goodwill by affecting happiness and welfare of perceived living beings. Bentham focuses on happiness and Mill's more abstract happiness concept makes it possible for him to maintain the view that "human dissatisfaction is dissatisfied". I'm in the mood. "Pigs are satisfied; it is better that Socrates is not satisfied with pigs. For details, refer to the introduction of Part V.

These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "Utilitarianism". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback Ethical view of Utilitarianism. This article briefly introduces a practical perspective first, then applies them to the questions provided at the end of case studies. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a philosophical point of view including moral and moral behavior derived from utility. Practicality is often replaced by a happy idea. Therefore, happiness is regarded as the ultimate benefit of making ethical decisions. Utilitarianism is happiness Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the result, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed a utilitarian idea. Utilitarian thinks that actions that create more happiness in the world are correct behavior and I believe that behavior that leads to a decrease in pain and happiness is wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory originally named Jeremy as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonists (happy followers) proposed "principles". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness' What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept and if it tends to promote the happiness of the maximum number of people it will maintain correct behavior. Utilitarians define morally correct behavior as actions to maximize certain non-moral good or happiness and to minimize certain unethical evils. Happiness is an example of nonmoral goodness, and pain is an example of unethical evil. Utilitarian consequences on action rather than inherent consequences

What defines humanity Character criteria At some point everyone asks who they are. Some people are trying to find answers through their life. I will ask if these questions mean our human nature. In any case, what does it mean that it is a human being? I once thought that a person was born, had a mother and a father, and could decide his life. It became ineffective when I realized that a newborn baby can not decide my life before I was two to three years old. Personality is the position of a person. Defining personality is a controversial topic in philosophy and law and is closely related to legal and political concepts of citizenship, equality and freedom. According to the law, it is a natural person or a corporation that has rights, protection, privilege, liability and legal liability. The personality problem is a matter of international debate which is questioned in ethics such as human and non-human slavery, theology, abortion and fetal rights and / or discussion on reproduction, animal rights activity, theology and ontology abolition It is the subject. Theories and arguments about the beginnings of corporate personality and personality In almost all countries today, the perfect natural personality extends to all people over the legal age. Those individuals, whether citizens or not, are given specific rights, are responsible for certain obligations, and are responsible for omission or commissioning acts. People under legal adult age may not be able to acquire perfect personality and therefore limit the exercise of specific rights (such as voting) and the responsibility for crime (so young people are fully law It should not be subject to anger) The fetal personality law is diverse and complex as it is determined only by state. Most of these laws define humans to include fetuses during pregnancy. (NCSL, 2015) It is this wording that has the problem, which is a fear of proponents of choice on the character of the fetus. The fact that the fetus of all ages may be a victim of crime may confound the late fetus who died as a result of violent attacks or attacks, and the aborted fetus for some other reason . Prosecute them for necessary infeasible fetal abortion It is an abstraction. Some faiths and fetuses believe that they have a moral character because they meet certain criteria during pregnancy. However, these attempts to attempt to characterize the essential features of personality during pregnancy fail. Another way to establish the moral position of the fetus and the fetus in the secular framework is to insist that they should give them some moral status. There seems to be two main ways to defend a given moral status, namely consequentialism and contract theory. This paper presents a discussion of the results on the moral status of pre-embryos, embryos, fetuses and infants. It states the rise in the original version of the normal view, ie the moral status during pregnancy, and defends it

It is very difficult for an impure Puritan of "red" to provide a sincere and fair legal system in the world of social turmoil, misery, confusion. As a result, in Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter" people use their religion (Puritan) as judges, jurors and executioners. Depending on the person, if you are surrounded by prejudicial people and women with intimidating men and women, sometimes it is very troublesome to live a normal life. In this story, Hester Prynne is both a victim and a colleague of her religion. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the offense of adultery she committed. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism Nathaniel Hawthor believes that Puritans are "pure" and not pure. In the world of cultural turmoil, misfortune, crazy, it is extremely difficult to provide a sincere and fair legal system. Therefore, in Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter" residents use their religion Puritan as judges, jurors, and executors. It is very troublesome for many people to live a normal life when they are bound by prejudiced and biased biometrics. In this story, Hester Prynne is a victim of her fellowman and her religion. In "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne depicts the strong value of Puritan of the 17th century through urban residents and women. Religion is the life style of Puritan. Their values ​​are reflected in their emotions, attitudes, actions and words. Hester Prine committed adultery, which contradicted Puritan's belief. By examining the punishment given to Hester, Hawthorne was able to keep emphasizing Puritan with an image of scarlet letters around her! Let's throw mud! "(Hawthorne, 70 years old). This indicates that from the very young age Puritan was taught that sinners should be excluded and should be subject to torture. And a legend of red letters. However, try hard, in thoughtfulness and in the circle of self.

This work may be analyzed more than any other work related to Utilitarianism. However, I am trying to do something that many other people could not achieve so far. I will explain in chapter 5 each chapter of utilitarianism so that the reader agrees with Mill's doctrine, and in case of agreeing to decide which part to subscribe. I did this because I noticed that the majority of Mill's deliberations in the sentence disappear completely. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. The ethical theory of John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) is most widely described in his classic text Utilitarianism (Utilitarianism) (1861). The aim is to prove that the principle of utilitarianism is the foundation of morality. This principle shows that behavior is right as behavior tends to promote the general well-being of mankind. Therefore, Muller focuses on the outcome of action, not right or moral sentiment. This article examines the central idea of ​​his original utilitarianism, but the last two sections of the article concern the logic system (1843) and the reasons for the freedom and punishment of the will that can be found in the Sir William Test Focus on Mueller's view. Hamilton's philosophy (1865) Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

Utilitarianism is an assertion that all actions must bring the greatest happiness to more people (Bentham, 42). Utilitarianism, however, is not necessarily the foundation of human decision. Because people need to pay attention to their own pain and happiness before consulting others' happiness. I will first explain the argument of utilitarian ideals. Let me explain why this argument is not persuasive. Finally, before you think about others, I will prove why people think of their own happiness. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness' Obligations are different, and their supporters are John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism has two types. Behavior Utilitarianism and rule Utilitarianism. Utilitarian critics, however, argue that moral theory can explain the severity of certain moral obligations, such as commitment obligations. However, Sartorius (1969) argues that behavioral utilitarian claims that the characteristics of moral obligation are based on retrospective consideration - utilitarianism and utilitarianism. The two ethical theories included in the course are Utilitarianism and Kant's theory. Utilitarianism is a view that the moral value of action depends entirely on the contribution to the overall utility, ie contribution to all abstracts, happiness or happiness (Wikipedia 2009). It is built on the ability to predict the outcome of an action. This theory is also known as "principle of maximum happiness". For Utilitarians, the choice that brings the greatest benefit to most people is a morally right choice. One of the advantages of this ethical theory is that Utilitarians can use a score system to compare similar predicted solutions and decide which choice is more beneficial for more people. Utilitarianism has two types. These theories are action utilitarianism and dominated utilitarianism. Behavior Utilitarianism is the same as the definition of Utilitarian above.

However, at the present time, the impact of the conclusions derived from this report on the environment is enormous and unsustainable in the near future and in the future. Animal meat raised on a factory farm is not the only viable option for meat and protein sources. Meat manufactured in the laboratory newly synthesized at the end of 2013 has little environmental impact due to its manufacturing process. Another option is to add or replace traditional meat with substitute meat such as tofu and beans. Discussion of "Utilitarianism" in a loose sense means that for "its good result" that good or bad results need not be restricted to increase or decrease (or for that "bad result" It may contain other things that are happiness, but not strictly utilitarian theory without positive or negative intrinsic value. - Example: "The US Food and Drug Administration should not approve" morning "pills to promote only non-spousal sex. Allegations against media such as "whistleblowers" and WikiLeaks are almost always characterized by the concept of this result. These arguments represent the moral principle of utilitarianism. In the era of globalization, the principle of utilitarianism should lead to confidentiality issues under the protection of national security. Muller's conclusion in the context of national security is that some Wikileaks are unethical. Complete clarity can cause pain more than expected. Hypothetical scenarios revealed from protected information show extreme and harmful results. When diplomacy loses legitimacy, diplomatic behavior is at risk. During Kant's "will" and the consequences of Mill's utilitarianism, society was challenged by great moral principles. Discussion for subdividing each discussion is the subject of this paper. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

It is not, it is impossible. All so-called "positive" duties are impossible to achieve, morality never calls impossible. Let us assume that we have an obligation to help others so that we do not hurt others. When I went to bed, I did not hurt anyone, but I did not help someone else. So, through this assumption, I am evil through sleepinng. Obviously this is ridiculous, so there is no obligation to help others. We can avoid hurting innocent people at any time. This is very easy. We can sometimes help others, it is fine. In the words of bioethics, these obligations are often explained as useful and provide obligation to improve health (or sometimes express interests to others) health and welfare care. Respect for obligation to harm, autonomy, people's general obligation to self-decide their own choices of life and body, and obligation to avoid discrimination based on justice and irrelevant characteristics (individuals in morally relevant circumstances Expressed as equality treatment) Under the label of justice, it is the responsibility to assign healthcare resources in a way that can be defended to be fair. Fairness rather than arbitrary or capricious In any case, this correspondence to distributive objections depends on our ability to balance our special obligation with our natural or inevitable duty. According to the defenders of the vast majority of special obligations, such obligations are provisional obligations, that is, they are obligations with a certain weight and are offset by the weight of other special obligations or other types of obligations be able to. In order to understand what all of our responsibilities are, we need to weigh all our reasons for action and decide which is the strongest or the heaviest. One of the benefits of result theory and other theory treats all duties or responsibilities as derived from the basic obligation (duty to maximize value), so we decide which of the responsibilities is the strongest There is no need to do. Any instance What is special about special obligations? One way to answer this question is to compare special obligations with specific non-special duties or obligations. Examples of such "non-special" obligations or obligations are supported by the results. (Special obligations can be contrasted with other non - special obligations, see section III). According to one form of resultantism, the correct behavior is the behavior that produces the net maximum intrinsic value in all alternatives available to the agent, the intrinsic value is not intended by itself, It is the value of itself. Different things (Of course there are many forms of consequentialism - the important feature of these ideas for our purposes is that they understand the right acts as the outcome of the act (actual, possible or possible) That is the result, and that is the result.

In Mill's Utilitarian thesis, Mill observed that many people worked together and misunderstood utilitarianism by enjoying the same idea and concept. In fact, Mill said that utility is described as being a kind of happiness, not pain. Mill focused on the relationship between public interest and happiness and decided that utility could be regarded as the principle of maximum happiness. This principle insists that action is correct as they tend to promote happiness and mistakes as they tend to produce a reversal of happiness. Explain what is utilitarian utilitarianism. What kind of procedures should Utilitarians take when determining a series of actions? What is the difference between Million's Utilitarianism and Bentham? Why does Mill act according to utilitarianism? Next, I will explain how to think Kant's criticism against Mill as a utilitarian. Finally, I will evaluate the credibility of this criticism. Eat factory - meat on farm. Explain the main argument of Alasdair Norcross on why it is morally wrong to eat meat on the factory farm. Then explain what Kant is based on this argument, what Epicurean is based for this argument, and how Norcross reacts to them. Evaluate next: what do you agree with (if any) and why? Do you think that it is ethically acceptable to eat meat raised in the factory? The dominant philosophy of Britain in the 1800s was Utilitarianism developed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarians believe that the greatest happiness is a trial of good and evil for most people. They believe that all existing social systems, in particular law and government, have to be changed to satisfy the greatest happiness trials. In "Women's obedience" (1869), Muller wrote that legal subordination of women to men should be replaced by "the principle of perfect equality". This idea was revolutionary in the Mill era. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter" Puritan community's "Red Letter" is a novel by Nathaniel Hawthorn held in the community of Boston in 1640. It shows a dark, gray, violent moral society which is regarded as the utopia of Puritans. The protagonists of the story are Hester Prynne, Arthur Ding Mesdale, Roger Chillings. This novel shows the impact of sin on the heart and mind The fall of a person may be caused by hidden guilt and revenging destructive human emotions. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism The word "Red Letter" represents the strict Puritan code in the middle of the 17th century. This is evident in "red word" written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. This novel tells the story of adultery and the strength of sin. Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale faced the challenges and personal values ​​of the Puritan society and committed adultery. - Explain the cloning, characterization and tissue distribution of two human peroxisome proliferator activated receptor isoforms, hPPARg 2 and hPPARg 1. In co-transfection assays, the two isoforms are activated to about the same extent by known PPARg activators. Human PPARg and retinoic acid X receptor (RXR) bind to DNA as heterodimers In the 1640's the Massachusetts Bay colony, Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel "Scarlet Letter" tells the story of Puritan community Hester Prinen (ie, by refining the Christian principle strictly ). Social community). Lover, Pastor Arthur Dimsdale and his daughter Pearl. It solves all major problems of human struggle. What is morality? Is it public or private? Does anyone have the right to tell us the state of our soul? If morality is truly private, does it mean that there is no such sin? Speaking of sin, where will you draw a line?

Foolish Puritan in 'red letter' Boyfriend and Fletcher wrote in one of the plays, "Man's poison is meat and drink of others." Almost everything in the world can be explained in at least two contradictory ways. In the "red letter", Puritan society avoided the person named pearl, but the writer who lived in a romantic era saw her in awe with respect and respect. Nathaniel Hawthorne's use of natural images at "Red Letter" always reflects the whimsical character of pearls, reminds Hester's sin, and his romantic idealistic beauty shocks the Puritan society Gave. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Hawthorn novel "Red Letter", the hero, Hester Prinn is a true contemporary of the modern era cast in the Massachusetts 17th century Boston Puritan. "Red Letter" is an innovative novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne who studied the ugliness, complexity and power of human spirit and personality, a new idea of ​​independence and the struggle faced by American women in the 17th century Share. In the whole novel, Hester refused to remove the scarlet letter and became sharper.

The secularized ethics can be defined as "basic principles of correct behavior, especially with respect to specific people, occupations, etc." But Christian ethics can not be simply defined. The moral values ​​of Christianity can not be reduced to a series of rules that are easy to follow. "Christian ethics is basically a question of theater played in the creation of God and the purpose of redemption to the world. Secular ethics is the difference between morality and morality followed by the worldly world. These rules and morals tend to be overlooked by religious communities and are considered "evil". However, secular ethics plays an important role in today's society. Without them, the world will be filled with confusion and civilization. Secular ethics are the laws of our government and various social impacts / rewards for people who infringe / obey them are also included. They are the driving force behind the secular population, making the world a better place, essentially making everyone happy and entering a better society. essay.com/Secular ethics - Why is practical rather than religious ethics in today's society? (Persuasive article) Secular Ethics - Why are they more practical than religious ethics in today's society? (Persuasive article) Secular ethics is not a so - called supernatural revelation or guidance, but a moral philosophy that ethics is based only on human abilities such as scientific rationality, social biology, or ethical intuition. Secular ethics includes various moral and ethical systems, including consequentialism, liberal ideology, humanism, secular humanism, and utilitarianism. Most secular moral concepts are logical deductions of the acceptance of natural rights and social contracts and more individualized forms of intrinsic value due to things, the establishment of Kantianese moral intuitionism or preference It is based on. Like Occam's razor, another one. Please also consider ways such as moral egoism, moral relativism, moral skepticism, moral nihilism.

The death penalty in the United States is a perpetrator of a violent crime (murder) which is a controversial topic in our society. The fundamental question is whether the capital punishment should be permitted as it is today, or should be abolished some or all of the death penalty. My argument is as follows. 1) The death penalty does not effectively prevent violent crimes. 2) Life sentence is more serious than the death penalty, not as expensive as it is implemented, more suitable for rehabilitation. The conclusion that "the death penalty is not morally acceptable" is an easily understandable discussion. Nathanson considered various arguments to defend the death penalty in the United States. Deterrent, cost, as a result of the procedural issues, moral desert and the death penalty, has been studied in the United States Constitution. Particularly useful treatment of US criminal case debate. More In the context of general punishment theory, death completely separate, opposite, taken in subtle approach, because it is usually mixed theory that combine elements of retaliation principle and consequentialism. The author also discussed the US (or perhaps anywhere) the importance of incomplete criminal proceedings for managing the death penalty in. This sentence contains responses of each person to other arguments. Currently, the death penalty is a very controversial issue in all the countries of the world including the United States. The death penalty is defined as "a criminal judgment sentenced to death after being convicted at the criminal court" ("capital" 1). The death penalty could be traced back to ancient Chinese law, where it was used to punish various crimes (Reggio 1). - Child psychologist Bruno Bettelheim is one of the most controversial psychoanalysts in history. Born in Vienna in 1903, he was sent to a concentration camp and was released after the Second World War. He soon traveled to the United States and became a citizen. In the United States, Bettelheim was a professor at the University of Chicago. He also works with many children with mental disorders and helps them in their daily lives.

It is well known that pacemakers have failed before, but the above pacemakers may be considered not to have the company's transistors. Nonetheless, other transistors used may be inadequate to manufacture (Shanks, 1996). Therefore, the main practical problem posed is whether the company will terminate the contract without incurring unnecessary risks involved, or whether to continue the contract and save lives of countless people. Utilitarianism is the theory of resultualism that philosophers call. The result - based theory is a moral theory, which states that the outcome or influence of the action determines whether the action is morally correct or incorrect. In the case of Utilitarianism, if an action brings more happiness or pain, it is determined as moral justification and error. The effect of action is what Utilitarians see when judging whether the action is appropriate. Utilitarianism was first described in detail by British philosopher Jeremy Bentham. (Vaughan 83) He believes that happiness is the only real good that exists. Therefore, the only ethical behavior is to produce the greatest happiness or the most sad behavior. (Bentham) Utilitarian form of Bentham is now also known as classical utilitarianism and is very simple and easy to use. Bentham believes that correct moral behavior is to bring maximum happiness to all affected people. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

Morality has played an important role that is not always recognized in defining ethics. Principles are often virtues that apply only to society and can be distinguished from law, religion, or morality. Morals in a definite sense may differ from each other, depending on the foundation of the society that asserts that morality. Different societies have different understanding of the meaning of moral priorities. When others concentrate on practice, their ethics can be based on purity and honesty. Many philosophers encourage morality. Because it usually prevents and avoids harm to the society that forms a particular group. The most interesting ethical concepts appear in the question of whether to show more. Due to our human nature, we have certain moral obligations - painful or happy experiences, our family restrictions, or these approvals or disapprovals. In a survey of his moral principle, Hume said: "The end of all moral speculation is to teach ourselves our own responsibilities, and through the proper expression of bad habits and virtues, Let's avoid us and hold one more hug. "(Hume, p. 177). Philosophers are not trying to imagine human rationality and scientific behavior like Descartes but are trying to explain human facts. He compiled these facts into a very general principle even if it was small. By doing so, he found reasons why people approve or oppose some moral behavior. Hume's philosophy as a whole is based on verification of humanity. And his knowledge from sensory experience and exam. Hume believes knowledge comes from experience and observation, even in physical or mathematical competitions. But moral judgment depends on passion and emotion to define approval and disapproval. Hume has a fairly positive and natural view of the moral judgment in Hume's theory, that is, moral sentiment. Approval and disapproval must be tied together by feelings and emotions. If morality comes from emotion, There are many definitions of the essence of philosophical exploration of morals and ethics. Moral or moral philosophy is the quest for the morally valuable and ordered nature of behavior, that is, the nature of how human behavior should be. What is this (moral condemnation) coming from? Morally speaking, the most basic question sounds like "What is the ultimate benefit for us to fight?" "Why do you choose this behavior instead of others?" This moral dilemma? "Should not morally do good behavior and should not take morally correct action?" "Finally" Why do we act ethically? "Or" Why do we want morality? " Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a field of philosophy focused on research on correct questions, false questions and how we should live. Morals include making moral decisions about right or wrong, good or bad. Whether it is true or wrong is the quality or moral judgment we give to our behavior. Ethical research has three areas of meta ethics including methods, language, logical structure, and reasoning to explain ethical terms. Moral or moral philosophical research can describe the theory of whether it is right or wrong systematically. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta - ethics studies our moral values ​​of where languages ​​and principles came from, and what they mean. And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normative ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on.

However, due to this decision, she was tortured not only by public torture but also by spiritual torture. Psychologically, she must take responsibility for maintaining her hidden emotions and knowing the real identity of her secret lover. During Hester's investigation on page 22, Hawthorne said to her, "As far as this name is concerned, I endure his pain and I endure his secret feelings." It is not suitable. "But Hester is not the only one that stands on the footing. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism The purpose of "Scarlet Letter" by Nathaniel Hawthorne is to show how an individual is eliminated and isolated from a suppressive society strictly adhering to spiritual beliefs and erroneous morals. Hawthorne emphasized that the Puritan society rejected the psychological impact of human psychology through Hester Pudding, pastor Din Mesdale, Roger Chillings. - The Scarlet Letter Theme Association should handle sin. In the "red letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne brought us back to our roots and returned to Puritan New England. And answer us through this cleverly made novel. Hawthorn novel "Red Letter", the hero, Hester Prinn is a true contemporary of the modern era cast in the Massachusetts 17th century Boston Puritan. "Red Letter" is an innovative novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne who studied the ugliness, complexity and power of human spirit and personality, a new idea of ​​independence and the struggle faced by American women in the 17th century Share. In the whole novel, Hester refused to remove the scarlet letter and became sharper. Nathaniel Hawthorne paints Salem's painting in the state of Massachusetts in the latter half of the 17th century with his novel "Scarlet Letter". Salem citizens work under the strict rules and restrictions imposed by their Puritan priesthood politics. Hester Prynne was sentenced to give a red letter "A" to his chest as punishment for adultery, but many other citizens seemed to admit a similar crime without admitting it. They will continue to fulfill the role of a devout Puritan - hypocrites hide the truth

Because each has a different moral philosophy that is subjective, the moral dilemma challenges enterprises. Companies have different moral principles to form a moral atmosphere. The two moral philosophies that influence the way companies deal with ethics are utilitarianism and moral egoism. "Utilitarians are seeking the greatest profit for most people" while minimizing the damage (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2011, p. 156). Moral egoism believes that the results are relevant only to individuals "Everyone should pursue only their own interests" (Rachels & Rachels, 2010, p.197). In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; it focuses on "moral?" Rather than "moral". And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that affect correctness and tort. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably as "moral" and sometimes more narrowly used to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. Likewise, certain moral theories, especially moral ethics, distinguish ethics from morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

Important evaluation patterns / object recognition used to explain the theoretical method of pattern / object recognition include processes involved in image and object recognition. This mainly involves capturing information in the vision system and comparing it with the information stored in memory to find a match. There are three ways of pattern recognition: template theory and prototype theory, feature comparison theory, structural theory. Q.5 Reference theory model to evaluate interventions to achieve positive change or lack of method assessment A specific theoretical model that supports interventions designed to alter health knowledge, attitudes, or behaviors, or Evaluate the effectiveness of the method. 1.1. Many attempts to improve and develop knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and health public health are based on the assumption that there is relevance between health knowledge, health attitudes, health behavior, and health outcomes. Sometimes it is assumed that there is a direct causal relationship between these, but other commentators believe that these relationships are more vulnerable. Many public health interventions - whether they are focusing on individuals, communities, the entire population, or the environment - change health-related knowledge, attitudes and / or behavior in some way to affect health effects I will In this article, we evaluate the health promotion literature based on the theoretical and practical knowledge of the psychological process in healthy behavior called "Being SunSmart can reduce the risk of cancer". I understand the purpose and purpose of the leaflet, the purpose and method of the leaflet, how the information in the leaflet understands how we are taking health though not thinking about health care, It is action. Also, critically evaluate the leaflet of "Become SunSmart to reduce cancer risk" and explain what can be improved to raise awareness of the cause. In the next article, we try to critically evaluate consequentialism. The discussion will focus on literature and perspectives related to this philosophical and theoretical position center and the most serious opposition. Third, these opposite arguments against consequences are related to the background of criminal justice practice. Remember this aspect in the next section and will be evaluated at the end of the study on the extent to which this moral philosophy is related to the practice of modern criminal justice.

In the novel "Red Letter", many people are discussing the credibility of characters in books. Some parts of the story are very reliable. On the other hand, many parts of the story are so impossible that such an event can not happen in that age. Some personality traits are suspicious for the proposed period. However, in some sort of opinion, this book has various possibilities. Hester Prynne is a reliable person. Hester Prynne is undoubtedly prominent in the community. The Puritan community in the "red letter" believes that letting Hester wear a red letter "A" on his chest will be a penalty for her sins. When she met Hester, the community saw only the "sinner". Hawthorne wrote in chapter 2 that in the case of Hester, "An unfortunate culprit makes himself the best woman and grips and concentrates them under the strong pressure of a thousand indomitable eyes." Explained Hester as "to keep oneself", proving that she kept its unique self-sufficiency even after a strict review. Hester was facing public humiliation everyday, so she could cancel the pearl completely away from the city, but she decided to alienate herself and her daughter. Finally, Hester uses her embroidery talent to decorate her shame badge. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism

The word "moral" comes from Greek ethikas meaning letters. Today, we use ethics to describe normative criteria of behavior. The history of philosophical ethics can be divided into five rational methods: virtue, tradition, modernity, and postmodern ethics. At these times, moral philosophy changed with changes in society. The first rational way is virtue ethics. The main philosophers during this period were Plato, Aristotle, Epicuras and Plutak. Meta ethics is the most difficult and least practical field of ethical philosophy. This is a study of morality itself. In meta ethics, what is important is not "moral" but "moral". It discusses the use of language in morality, granting of moral authority, and whether morals really exist. Philosophers recognize that the structure of the sentences describing the moral character is basically the same as the structure describing the physical features. I hear that "violence is wrong" and "banana is yellow." Cognitiveism tells us that sentences look alike as their sentences are similar; they all express clear understanding of reality. Morality exists, we can explain them in words (the expressed opinion may be wrong - violence may be acceptable and bananas may be purple ). Non-cognitiveists say that descriptive moral descriptions do not describe true moral features because there is no morality. In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; it focuses on "moral?" Rather than "moral". And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that affect correctness and tort. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics is usually distinguished in three different ways: philosophy, meta ethics, normative ethics, writing ethics. Meta-ethics seeks to understand the essence of morality, moral judgment, and moral terms such as "good", "bad", "responsible". Normative ethics strives to answer ethical questions, such as taking correct actions and what direction to take in specific circumstances. Descriptive ethics studies how individual moral perspectives and beliefs reflect their behavior and attitudes (Bowles, 2006). Superior social workers need to be aware of the social and occupational values ​​behind their work in order to empower individuals, families, and communities. Repression practices and values ​​are reflected in the BASW Code of Ethics (BASW, 2012).

Why Muller distinguishes between high pleasure and low pleasure and evaluates whether he has achieved his goal. In his article, the Utilitarian Institute detailed the utilitarianism as a moral theory and answered that misunderstanding. Utilitarianism in the word of Mill is a view that behavior is correct because there is a tendency to promote happiness and mistakes because there is a tendency to produce reversal of happiness. 1 Therefore, Utilitarianism provides answers to basic questions. Ethics are worried: 'How to live?' 'Or' What is the good or the right way to live? ' Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticized Kant as it does not recognize that moral law is proved by moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (maximum maximum profit is sought Should be). Muller believes that Kant's morality can not explain why specific behavior is wrong without relying on Utilitarianism. As a basis of morality, Mill believes that his utility principle has a stronger intuitive foundation than Kant's dependence on reason, and why explaining better why specific behavior is wrong or wrong I can. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill, originally published as three independent papers in 1861 and then published as a collection in 1863, is one of the most famous Utilitarian ethics tests so far. Long-term debate about ethical tradition opens sentences. And there is a general lack of great progress. He could not reach any agreement on the philosopher's decision to be "right" or "wrong", understanding of society's morals remained unchanged in the study of philosophy over generations of generations I pointed out. He explains this lack of change by implying that all morals have a philosophical basis, and this foundation is Utilitarianism: moral action promotes happiness without happiness and pain It is a belief. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

Red Letter: Puritan is really such a thing. Nathaniel Hawthorne accurately depicts Burston's colonial Puritans and his behavior, Hester Prinn's response to adultery, and subsequent events in his book "Red Letter". Understanding of Puritans and how severe they are all sexual acts. It is not difficult. In "Red Letter", I saw Hester Prynne declared insulted because my husband disappeared for four years and assumed that she was missing and drowning in the sea. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Hawthorn novel "Red Letter", the hero, Hester Prinn is a true contemporary of the modern era cast in the Massachusetts 17th century Boston Puritan. "Red Letter" is an innovative novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne who studied the ugliness, complexity and power of human spirit and personality, a new idea of ​​independence and the struggle faced by American women in the 17th century Share. In the whole novel, Hester refused to remove the scarlet letter and became sharper.

Utilitarianism in philosophical ethics is the doctrine that our actions are correct if our actions produce the greatest happiness among the majority of people. But what is wrong with slavery? Some of the Utilitarian opponents use this moral reasoning by accusing the terrible behavior of slave merchants and slaveowners on utilitarianism I will try to abandon it. If we consider most people to be the most profitable and the greatest happiness for society with slavery, say that Utilitarianism is a system of beliefs that can admire or condemn slavery. Utilitarianism is easy to praise. Slavery. Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness' Jeremy · Bentham is known as the principal representative of Utilitarian school. Utilitarians believe that there is no inherent error in the theory. Their argument is that each case is different and deserves to be examined individually to see if it is morally acceptable. For the United States, the only way to be tortured is "equivalent to pain associated with serious physical injuries such as organ failure, physical dysfunction, and even death." Although this position was relaxed later, there were people who were tortured in the treatment of prisoners who were still condemned because medical training was not required to do painful injections. There are several utilitarianisms. But fundamentally, the moral utilitarian approach means that ethical behavior (such as theft) or rules (eg, "keep your promise") are essentially true or false. Conversely, the correctness or erroneous nature of an act or rule is a problem of the overall unethical quality (eg, satisfaction of happiness, happiness, health, knowledge, or personal desire) arising as a result of an act or rule It is only. Overall, according to Utilitarianism, morality is a matter of unethical quality created by moral behavior and regulation, moral responsibility is more dexterous than internal. Morality is a means to reach the opponent, it is by no means an aim.

Some people think that strict enforcement of the laws of endangered species in the United States severely hinders our economic development. On the other hand, I have to object. The Endangered Species Protection Act was established for an important reason to protect the biodiversity of the planet. Whenever a human interferes with the ecosystem for economic growth it will tear it little by little. For these reasons, it is necessary to establish a strict law like the Endangered Species Act. The truth is that the problem still remains. In order to develop my own personal environmental ethics, I have to ask myself various questions and try to find my position in moral debate. Finally, I believe that my personal environmental ethics is centered on ecological ethics. I am thinking of consequentialism, humanity centrality, and overall ethics. I chose ecological ethics rather than liberation of animals because I thought the rights and values ​​of animals are different, but I thought that the whole ecosystem is more valuable than the various values. I noticed that I integrate animal liberation and ecological ethics by themselves, but I tend to move towards ecological ethics. In this paper, we describe qualitative research on environmental ethics by environmental activists. 29 participants reply in writing about the definition of their own environmental ethics, this ethical-oriented expression and experience in their lives, and the openness of maintaining this ethical orientation. There are four major themes. First, the ethical consideration of the natural environment extends to ethics, values, personal life and public life. Secondly, emotional or spiritual experience or personal achievement is important to many people. Third, there are differences in the relationship between environmental principles, intent and action, and the need to define specific behaviors. Finally, there is a different view on the role of humanitarian concerns in environmental ethics. Environmental ethics is formally defined as a study of the interaction between humans and nature. In terms of business, environmental ethics is related to the company's responsibility to protect the environment in which the business is deployed. Public perceptions of damage caused by human behavior to the environment have encouraged people's demand for government regulation directly affecting the enterprise's ability to perform business. Corporate response to government regulation is the greatest concern of environmental business ethics.

The Scarlet Letter: The Mysterious Puritan Society At The Scarlet Letter of Nathaniel Hawthorne, life is focused on a strict Puritan society. Everyone needs the opportunity to express their true feelings; otherwise the feelings will submerge until they become unstable. Unfortunately, society does not allow this expression, so the character must seek out other ways to alleviate his own personal needs and desires. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Nathaniel Hawthorne criticized Puritan society works, young Goodman Brown, and Scarlet letter. Many American writers examine religion through their literary work, but no one has enthusiasm for Nathaniel Hawthorne. Several Hawthorne's works are obvious criticisms of New England's 17th century Puritan society. - The prototype of this document in Paris during the horror period is an unpublished document. However, as it has been translated and printed as part of the book, it is now a published document. As a source of research, there are several advantages. First of all, it is now part of an acknowledged historical document. Next, since the author is close to the fear of Paris, it meets the criteria as a related document. Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter" is a story that a young Puritan woman adulged with a pastor in the middle of the 17th century and took the child to a critical small Puritan society. Initially, Hester Prinley was suppressed by society because it was called "A" in the promise of adultery, but eventually accepted the letter, changed the meaning of Scarlet "A" from Adultery to Able and suppressed It will be. An active member of sexual puritan society. Many people believe that Hester is being oppressed by the community, but she still insists on her identity and becomes an active member of society. Hester provided important aid to the community through frequent social activities in tailoring. She prospered in her own way to counter her position she gave at the beginning of the novel.

Describing Hawthorne 's Puritan Association "Red Letter" In the introduction sketch of Nathaniel Hawthorne' s novel "The Scarlet Letter", the reader told the reader that his ancestor persecuted Quaker. The latter son served as a senior judge at the Salem Witch trial and became a literary form with Arthur Miller's "The Crucible" (Judge Hathorne appeared). We learned that Hawthorne was ashamed of his behavior and that he saw his ancestors and the entire Puritan society with critical eyes. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Nathaniel Hawthorne criticized Puritan society works, young Goodman Brown, and Scarlet letter. Many American writers examine religion through their literary work, but no one has enthusiasm for Nathaniel Hawthorne. Several Hawthorne's works are obvious criticisms of New England's 17th century Puritan society. - The prototype of this document in Paris during the horror period is an unpublished document. However, as it has been translated and printed as part of the book, it is now a published document. As a source of research, there are several advantages. First of all, it is now part of an acknowledged historical document. Next, since the author is close to the fear of Paris, it meets the criteria as a related document.

In the "Red Letter" Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Red Letter" Puritan society is focused on a strict Puritan society in which people can not express their inner thoughts and emotions. Everyone needs the opportunity to express their true emotions; otherwise the emotions will continue until they become explosive. However, Puritan society does not admit this expression. People need to find other ways to alleviate their personal pain and suffering. In 'red letter', Hawthorne provided a shelter in the form of a forest. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Nathaniel Hawthorne criticized Puritan society works, young Goodman Brown, and Scarlet letter. Many American writers examine religion through their literary work, but no one has enthusiasm for Nathaniel Hawthorne. Several Hawthorne's works are obvious criticisms of New England's 17th century Puritan society. - The prototype of this document in Paris during the horror period is an unpublished document. However, as it has been translated and printed as part of the book, it is now a published document. As a source of research, there are several advantages. First of all, it is now part of an acknowledged historical document. Next, since the author is close to the fear of Paris, it meets the criteria as a related document.

Describing Hawthorne 's Puritan Association "Red Letter" In the introduction sketch of Nathaniel Hawthorne' s novel "The Scarlet Letter", the reader told the reader that his ancestor persecuted Quaker. The latter son served as a senior judge at the Salem Witch trial and became a literary form with Arthur Miller's "The Crucible" (Judge Hathorne appeared). We learned that Hawthorne was ashamed of his behavior and that he saw his ancestors and the entire Puritan society with critical eyes. Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism In the whole literary and art work "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne is using his character to express malfunction of the Puritan society's punishment process for sin. "Red Letter" was written in 1840 and published by Ticknor and Fields in 1850. Hawthorn draws the theme of sin and redemption through a complex story of "red". This is a story about how a woman, Jose · Blue, is committing adultery with a respected religionist in the Puritan society. Nathaniel Hawthorne criticized Puritan society works, young Goodman Brown, and Scarlet letter. Many American writers examine religion through their literary work, but no one has enthusiasm for Nathaniel Hawthorne. Several Hawthorne's works are obvious criticisms of New England's 17th century Puritan society. - The prototype of this document in Paris during the horror period is an unpublished document. However, as it has been translated and printed as part of the book, it is now a published document. As a source of research, there are several advantages. First of all, it is now part of an acknowledged historical document. Next, since the author is close to the fear of Paris, it meets the criteria as a related document.

John Stuart Mill was a very important philosopher of the 19th century and was one of the first utilitarian supporters. In his article "Choose Utilitarianism", Muller defines what the theory is and provides his correspondence to the general misunderstandings of people. The principle of utility or maximum happiness states that "Behavior is correct as they tend to encourage happiness and faults because they tend to produce a reversal of happiness" (77 Mill). Utilitarianism is related to the global benefit of the world in terms of personal happiness. Concept of utility principle given by John Stuart Mill. In the article "What is Utilitarianism" #, Mill proposed a theory of utilitarianism, he summarized his "utility" or "principle of maximum happiness" (Mill 89). The focus of Mill is "happiness" based on behavior, # lack of happiness and pain, or "unhappiness", # lack of goods and satisfaction, not a related intention (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill's principle, I will finish this. The ethical theory of John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) is most widely described in his classic text Utilitarianism (Utilitarianism) (1861). The aim is to prove that the principle of utilitarianism is the foundation of morality. This principle shows that behavior is right as behavior tends to promote the general well-being of mankind. Therefore, Muller focuses on the outcome of action, not right or moral sentiment. This article examines the central idea of ​​his original utilitarianism, but the last two sections of the article relate to the reasons of freedom and punishment of the will that can be found in the logic system (1843) and Sir William test Focus on Mueller's view. Hamilton's philosophy (1865) Utilitarian utilitarianism is the ethical theory of consequentialism. According to the results, the behavior is right or wrong. John Stuart Mill is an important philosopher who developed practical ideas. Utilitarian believes that actions that bring more happiness in the world are correct actions and actions that bring pain and less happiness are wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different versions. Utilitarian utilitarianism is a moral theory, originally named Jeremy, as a guiding principle of action under certain circumstances. Bentham's hedonist (a happy follower) proposed "principle". Utility called 'maximum amount of maximum happiness'

Humanity is philosophical; if morality exists in human nature, moral philosophy believes that human nature is philosophical. Observing moral models in human thoughts and behaviors usually involves analysis of introspection and behavior. Therefore, morality and philosophy are important themes in the current course entitled "Humanities science, large dialogue: reflexes and actions". However, the course calendar is written as follows. First let me say that morals are practical. Moral philosophy will be the philosophy of this practice. What I want to say is that the importance of moral philosophy is not the reason for taking action before acting but to understand the moral reflection after action. This is bold paper. If that is correct, it will add a special shadow to the current practice in Western academic philosophy. It turns out that itself is the cart problem, the "correct manufacturing function", or the correct way to kill a car. In other words, we are completely addicted to positive morality and tend to decide what is right in a series of environments. I would like to say that the correct role of moral philosophy is so to speak. Its purpose is not to help moral reviews, but to reflect morality. In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; it focuses on "moral?" Rather than "moral". And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that affect correctness and tort. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably as "moral" and sometimes more narrowly used to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. Likewise, certain moral theories, especially moral ethics, distinguish ethics from morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.

In the pioneering development stage of the United States, early settlers traveled long distances from England to the New World, mainly to escape religious persecution from the Protestant faith. These early colonialists were deeply rooted in their Puritanism and surrounded their overall livelihood according to the teachings of Puritan's Bible in the unknown British colonies of North America. But these Puritans are not the only living culture in the new world, as they eventually found a native American in their fog. Hawthorn novel "Scarlet" is an American classic and proved to be a major contribution to American literature. Hawthorne made it possible for his readers to gain insight about Puritan's past, they had rigid principles and unforgivable outcomes, and he took on these horror stories of his father's legacy I was very familiar with it. - The purpose of "Scarlet Letter" by Nathaniel Hawthorne is to show how individuals are eliminated and isolated from a suppressive society strictly adhering to spiritual beliefs and erroneous morals. Through Hester Prynne, pastor Ding Mesdale, Roger Chillings, Hawthorne emphasizes the emotional impact of the Puritan society rejecting human psychology. Can I be in a room full of people, can I feel perfectly alone? This is the case of Puritan society drawn by "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne. This culture is dominated by strict and strict Puritan guidelines, and all members of society seem to be undergoing some alienation. Alienation is isolation and isolation. People also have to be severely punished in violation of these rules, if the strict rules of Puritans are not enough to make people somewhat away from this society (most people inevitably have such I followed the rules). Violators are severely punished by society and rejected. Or people will worry about themselves by concealing their sins. All of these and more are working with "red letters" Puritan believed in a pure society when he solved intolerance in the "deficit", contempt and alienation Puritan's general religious affairs. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel "Red Letter". This is a novel based on the behavior of a woman named Hester Prynne and the crime of adultery she committed. And she must face the crime of dealing with sin. Life after the fact. She spent the rest of my life. - Bernard Williams criticizes results-basedism in "result-basedism and integrity" in order to argue that negative responsibility is inherently irrational and therefore denies the integrity of the agent. Peter Layton's "alienation, consequentialism, moral request" is an objection to Williams and advocacy of resultualism

Moral philosophy I. Sam had problems when the stock market fell to a steep slope. Not only did he lose the majority of millions, he was exposed to the fact that he was engaged in financial action. One evening, he was found in the office and was a victim of suicide. People who attended his funeral included his wife, children and his business partner. B) In this particular situation Sam is because the agent committed suicide because it lost millions on the stock market. In the field of morality, or moral philosophy, research can systematically describe the theory of what causes correct behavior or wrong behavior. Moral philosophy is usually divided into three categories: meta ethics, applied ethics, normative ethics. Meta-ethics studies our moral value, where language and principles derive; is it "moral" rather than "moral"? And provide a practical solution to ethical problems. Normology ethics studies ethical standards that influence legitimacy and fraud. The theory of normative ethics includes utilitarianism, consequentialism, contractileism, virtue ethics, and so on. Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a philosophical field to solve moral problems. The term "moral" is often used interchangeably with "moral" and sometimes it is used more narrowly to express the moral principles of a particular tradition, group or individual. It distinguishes between ethics and morality. "The morals and ethics of people are the same, but there is a usage that limits morality to institutions such as Emmanuel Kant, based on concepts such as responsibilities, duties, principles, etc. To further advance Aristotle's practical inference approach, Concepts based on virtue often protect ethics and often avoid separating "moral" considerations from other practical considerations.