Consequentialism: The Global Poor

The poor in the world is always a problem facing the world's generation and the gap between wealth and the poor is expanding, "What can we do to solve this problem?" In this article I will explain the moral meaning of resultantism and why Onora O'Neill's innocent opinion on this topic is more reasonable than the one following that of Peter Singer. I will explain the differences between Singer and O'Neill's views and their views.

How is this global consequence different from what we call a part of the rule - consequentialism? A part of our so-called rule - resultism is morally wrong action - a combination of standardism rules and rules - a process of making decisions. A part of the rule so defined - resultualism defines the question as to when moral sanctions are appropriate. Some partial rules - resultant says it should be condemned and guilty unless the agent chooses the action that will bring the best results. Partial rule A more reasonable position for the resultantists is that regardless of whether they can not produce the maximum results when they choose actions prohibited by the rules and outcome decision process Good behavioral impact

This is not the most common problem of global outcome. The most common problem is its maximizing behavior - the result of wrong standardism. According to this maximization criterion, the behavior is incorrect only if the maximum benefit can not be obtained. This standard judges that there are nothing bad for some behaviors, but that seems to be wrong, of course. It also judges some actions that seems not to be wrong. For example, consider a murder behavior that produces better results than any other action. According to the most familiar maximized behavior - misleading result - based criteria, this murder is not wrong. Many other actions, such as beatings, theft, promised destruction, liars, etc., may be wrong, even if doing something a bit better than not doing it. Likewise, the well-known, maximized behavioral performanceist format denies this.